Time-dependent cleavage of a high-mannose form of Ii to p25 in an intracellular compartment

Involvement of proteases in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus uncoating upon internalization in primary macrophages

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) replicates in differentiated macrophages. In macrophages, heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycans mediate the initial PRRSV attachment and the receptor sialoadhesin mediates both PRRSV attachment and internalization into endosomes. Upon a pH drop, PRRSV is uncoated and its genome is released from the endosomes into the cytoplasm, which allows virus replication. However, expression of heparan sulphate and sialoadhesin in non-susceptible cells only allows virus internalization, but no virus uncoating and infection, indicating that other factors are involved. In the present study, it is shown that treatment of macrophages with serum (mainly the alpha-globulin fraction) inhibited PRRSV infection without affecting attachment and internalization. Because alpha-globulins contain several protease inhibitors, macrophages were treated with different protease inhibitors to investigate the involvement of proteases in PRRSV uncoating. Treatment of macrophages with broadly active inhibitors of serine or aspartic proteases, but not cysteine- or metallo-proteases, inhibited PRRSV uncoating and infection. Further investigation using specific inhibitors indicated that the aspartic protease cathepsin E is involved during PRRSV uncoating, but did not allow identification of the serine protease involved. The involvement of cathepsin E during PRRSV uncoating was confirmed by partial co-localization of internalized PRRSV with cathepsin E. Furthermore, cathepsin E expression increased with macrophage cultivation, which was positively correlated with an increased susceptibility to PRRSV infection. Together, these data show that, in macrophages, both the aspartic protease cathepsin E and an unidentified trypsin-like serine protease are involved in uncoating of internalized PRRSV and subsequent infection.

Effects of brefeldin A on cleavage of invariant chain to p21 and p10 and the appearance of Ii-freed class II MHC dimers

Intracellular cleavage of class II MHC-associated Ii to p21 and p10 and the appearance of Ii-freed alpha, beta dimers were concurrent events lasting from 1 to 6 hr after synthesis of alpha, beta, Ii trimers, possibly related to charging of foreign peptides to the class II MHC antigen-binding site. Sequential immunoprecipitations of pulse-chase radiolabeled cells were made four times with anti-Ii monoclonal antibody to remove Ii and alpha, beta, Ii trimers and then with anti-class II antibody to detect the time-dependent appearance of Ii-freed alpha, beta dimers. The cleavage of Ii to p21 and p10 was revealed in leupeptin-treated cells. Cell treatment with Brefeldin A (BFA) was associated with a decrease in Ii-freed alpha, beta dimers, with inhibition of leupeptin-revealed cleavage of Ii to p21 and p10, and with persistence of endoglycosidase H susceptibility of Ii and class II alpha, beta chains. We conclude that in untreated cells, cleavage and release of Ii from class II MHC alpha and beta chains occur after those complexes traverse a BFA-sensitive step in the Golgi apparatus.

Identification of p70 and p80 associations with class II MHC molecules and Ii

Two proteins, p70 and p80, were found in chemically crosslinked complexes with class II MHC molecules and Ii after 3-12 hr labelings with [35S]methionine. Two-dimensional, nonreduced/reduced SDS gel electrophoresis of immunoprecipitated complexes revealed 1) endogenous disulfide linkages between Ii-Ii and Ii-p70 and 2) chemically crosslinked, nearest neighbors of alpha-beta, alpha-Ii, Ii-p70, and alpha-p80. Although such nearest neighbors within multimeric complexes were identified as dimers in nonreduced/reduced 2D gels, stoichiometries could not be determined in the high molecular weight complex(es), which included alpha, beta, Ii, p70, and p80, and were not separated in the first dimension. p80 was not the chondroitin-sulfate form of Ii (Ii-CS) because it was not electrophoretically heterogeneous and was not sensitive to chondroitinase ABC. p70 was not hsp72/74 detected with C92 or N27 mAbs, and p80 was not BiP detected with its respective mAb. While only these two proteins associated prominently with class II MHC antigens and Ii late after synthesis, their functions are unknown.

Comparison of three related methods to select T cell-presented sequences of protein antigens

A comparison of three methods to predict T cell-presented sequences within antigenic proteins led to the view that recurrent hydrophobic residues might nucleate excised peptides as alpha-helices against hydrophobic surfaces. Such helices could be protease-protected structures on their way to desetope binding. The compared methods were: the amphipathicity algorithm of DeLisi and Berzofsky [Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7048-7052. (1985)] as modified by Margalit et al. [J. Immun. 138, 2213-2229. (1987)] the strip of-helix hydrophobicity algorithm (SOHHA) of Stille et al. [Molec. Immun. 24, 1021-1027. (1987)] and the motifs algorithm of Rothbard and Taylor [EMBO J. 7, 93-100. (1988)]. Correct prediction was defined at two levels of stringency: (1) the predicted sequence overlapped the experimentally reported sequence when the ratio of the intersection of both to the union of both greater than or equal to 0.5 or (2) the sequences touched when there was a non-empty intersection of both sequences. We determined the sensitivity (correct predictions/number of reported T cell-presented sequences) and efficiency (correct predictions/number of predictions) at each level of stringency. In terms of overlap, the SOHHA was more sensitive (0.43) than the amphipathicity (0.29) (not significant) and motifs (0.0, 0.0) (p less than 0.05) predictions and more efficient (0.35) than the amphipathicity (0.14) and motifs (0.0, 0.0) predictions. At the less stringent criterion touching, the amphipathicity method (0.71) was as sensitive as motif Rothbard-4 (0.79) and more sensitive than SOHHA (0.57) and motif Rothbard-5 (0.43). At that criterion, the SOHHA was more efficient (0.47) than the amphipathicity (0.36) and motifs (0.25, 0.40) methods. We hypothesize that the comparability of these approaches reflected the common, predominant influence of recurrent hydrophobicity in their predictions.