Anorectal anomalies associated with or as part of other anomalies

Examining Results of Post-Thelarche Screening Pelvic Ultrasound in Females with Anorectal Malformations

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Mullerian duct anomalies are common in females with anorectal malformations (ARMs), although there are no universally recommended screening protocols for identification. Historically, at our institution, we have recommended a screening pelvic ultrasound (PUS) 6 months after thelarche and menarche. We aimed to evaluate outcomes associated with our post-thelarche screening PUS in females with ARMs.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed for all female patients 8 years old or older with ARMs and documented thelarche. Data were collected on demographic characteristics and clinical course. The primary outcome was adherence to the recommended PUS. Secondary outcomes included imaging correlation with suspected Mullerian anatomy and need for intervention on the basis of imaging findings.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 87 (77.7%) completed a recommended post-thelarche screening PUS. There were no differences in completion on the basis of age, race, establishment with a primary care provider, insurance status, or type of ARM. Nine patients (10.3%) had findings on their PUS that did not correlate with their suspected Mullerian anatomy; five (5.7%) required intervention, with two requiring menstrual suppression, two requiring surgical intervention, and one requiring further imaging.

CONCLUSION

Most patients completed the recommended post-thelarche screening PUS. In a small subset of patients, PUS did not correlate with suspected Mullerian anatomy and generated a need for intervention. Post-thelarche PUS can be a useful adjunct in patients with ARMs to identify gynecologic abnormalities.

Infracoccygeal/transperineal window: new method to prenatally diagnose and classify level of anal atresia

OBJECTIVES

To introduce a two-dimensional sonographic method to assess the fetal anus, and to evaluate the feasibility of this method to diagnose anal atresia prenatally and identify the presence or absence of anoperineal fistula (in males) and anovestibular fistula (in females).

METHODS

This was an observational study of suspected cases of anal atresia referred to a single center in Israel between August 2018 and October 2023. In addition to conventional evaluation of the perineum in the axial plane, fetuses referred to our center for suspected malformation were scanned with a new method termed the 'infracoccygeal/transperineal window'. This window consisted of a midsagittal view of the fetal pelvis, including the distal rectum and the anal canal. Normal anatomy was confirmed when the anal canal was continuous with the rectum and terminated at the expected location on the perineum. In female fetuses, the normal anal canal runs parallel to the vaginal canal and diverges posteriorly, terminating at the perineal skin, distant from the vestibule. In male fetuses, the normal anal canal diverges posteriorly in relation to the corpora cavernosa, terminating at the perineal skin, distant from the scrotum. High anal atresia was identified when a blind-ending rectal pouch was demonstrated in the pelvis without a fistula to the perineum or vestibule. Low anal atresia was determined when a rectal pouch was continuous with an anteriorly deflected fistula. In females, the fistula converges with the vaginal canal, terminating at the vestibule; in males, the fistula deflects anteriorly, terminating at the base of the scrotum. Postnatally, the diagnosis and type of anal atresia were confirmed through physical examination with direct visualization of the fistula, radiographic studies, surgical examination and/or postmortem autopsy.

RESULTS

Of the 16 fetuses diagnosed prenatally with anal atresia, eight were suspected to have low anal atresia and eight were suspected to have high anal atresia. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 23 (range, 14-37) weeks. All cases showed additional structural malformation. Eleven patients opted for termination of pregnancy, of which four had low anal atresia and seven had high anal atresia. Postnatal confirmation was not available in four cases due to curettage-induced mutilation or in-utero degradation following selective termination of the affected twin, leaving 12 cases for analysis, of which seven were diagnosed with low anal atresia and five with high anal atresia. In these 12 cases, all prenatal diagnoses were confirmed as correct, rendering 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in this high-risk fetal population.

CONCLUSIONS

The infracoccygeal/transperineal window is an effective method to detect and classify the level of anal atresia prenatally. This may improve prediction of postnatal fetal continence and optimize prenatal counseling. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Functional Outcome in Patients With Anorectal Malformation With Recto-prostatic or Recto-bulbar Urethral Fistula and Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches: A Multi-center Study

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare the outcomes in patients with anorectal malformation with rectoprostatic and rectourethral fistula between laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP).

METHOD

We performed a retrospective review on all males with anorectal malformation (ARM) with recto-prostatic (ARM-RP) or recto-bulbar urethral fistula (ARM-RB) treated in five tertiary paediatric surgical centres in the past 25 years. Defecative function was assessed using the Krickenbeck classification and Kelly's score. Functional outcomes between patients with LAARP and PSARP were compared.

RESULTS

There were a total of 136 males with ARM-RP and ARM-RB for analysis, among which 73 (53.7%) had ARM-RP and 63 (46.3%) had ARM-RB. The median age of the patients was 9.4 years (range 0.8-24.7 years) and the median age at operation was 0.4 years (0 day-3.1 years). 57 (41.9%) and 79 patients (58.1%) underwent PSARP and LAARP respectively. 34 patients (25%) had VACTERL association. 111 (81.6%) and 103 patients (75.7%) had sacral and spinal cord anomalies respectively. 19 patients (13.9%) eventually required Malone's Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE). For the comparison between PSARP and LAARP, no difference in Kelly scores (4.58 ± 1.63 versus 4.67 ± 1.36) was identified (p = 0.79). Logistic regression for voluntary bowel movement showed that VACTER association (p = 0.02) and fistula location (p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors, whereas the operation approach (PSARP or LAARP) was not (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

VACTERL association and fistula location were significant prognostic factors for voluntary bowel movement, and there appeared to be no significant difference in functional outcome between PSARP and LAARP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

High-grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Patients With Anorectal Malformation From the ARM-Net Registry: Is Our Screening Sufficient?

BACKGROUND

Vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is a common associated urological anomaly in anorectal malformation (ARM)-patients. High-grade VUR requires antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI's), renal scarring and -failure. The exact prevalence of high-grade VUR in ARM patients is unknown. Hence, the aim of this study was determining the incidence of high-grade VUR in ARM-patients, and its associated risk factors.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed using the ARM-Net registry, including data from 34 centers. Patient characteristics, screening for and presence of renal anomalies and VUR, sacral and spinal anomalies, and sacral ratio were registered. Phenotypes of ARM were grouped according to their complexity in complex and less complex. Multivariable analyses were performed to detect independent risk factors for high-grade (grade III-V) VUR.

RESULTS

This study included 2502 patients (50 % female). Renal screening was performed in 2250 patients (90 %), of whom 648 (29 %) had a renal anomaly documented. VUR-screening was performed in 789 patients (32 %), establishing high-grade VUR in 150 (19 %). In patients with a normal renal screening, high-grade VUR was still present in 10 % of patients. Independent risk factors for presence of high-grade VUR were a complex ARM (OR 2.6, 95 %CI 1.6-4.3), and any renal anomaly (OR 3.3, 95 %CI 2.1-5.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Although renal screening is performed in the vast majority of patients, only 32 % underwent VUR-screening. Complex ARM and any renal anomaly were independent risk factors for high-grade VUR. Remarkably, 10 % had high-grade VUR despite normal renal screening. Therefore, VUR-screening seems indicated in all ARM patients regardless of renal screening results, to prevent sequelae such as UTI's, renal scarring and ultimately renal failure.

TYPE OF STUDY

Observational Cohort-Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Congenital Heart Defects in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 281 Patients

In patients born with anorectal malformations (ARM), additional congenital heart defects (CHD) can occur. We aimed to provide an overview on disease and treatment details of CHD identified in patients born with ARM, from a unique large cohort of a very rare disease. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study between January 2000 and July 2023. All consecutive patients with ARM were included. Outcomes were the number of patients with CHD, and screening percentage and percentage of patients diagnosed with CHD over 3 time periods (2000-2006, 2007-2014, 2015-2023). We used uni- and multi-variable logistic regression analyses to search for associations between CHD present and baseline characteristics. In total, 281 patients were included. Some 241 (85.8%) underwent echocardiography, of whom 80 (33.2%) had CHD. Screening percentage with echocardiography increased (74.1% vs. 85.7% vs. 95.9%, p < 0.001) and percentage of patients diagnosed with CHD remained similar over time (30.2% vs. 34.5% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.836). Atrial and ventricular septal defects (n = 36, n = 29), and persistent left superior vena cava (n = 17) were most identified. The presence of VACTERL-association or a genetic syndrome was independently associated with the presence of CHD. CHD were present in 33% of patients with ARM that underwent echocardiography. Over time, the number of CHD identified through screening remained similar. Patients with the presence of VACTERL-association or a genetic syndrome had a higher risk of having CHD. Therefore, acknowledging the potential presence of CHD in patients with ARM remains important.

Expanding the clinical spectrum of Coffin-Siris syndrome with anorectal malformations: Case report and review of the literature

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) represent a wide spectrum of congenital anomalies of the anus and rectum, of which more than half are syndromic. Their etiology is highly heterogeneous and still poorly understood. We report a 4-year-old girl who initially presented with an isolated ARM, and subsequently developed a global developmental delay as part of an ARID1B-related Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS). A co-occurrence of ARMs and CSS in an individual by chance is unexpected since both diseases are very rare. A review of the literature enabled us to identify 10 other individuals with both CSS and ARMs. Among the ten individuals reported in this study, 8 had a variant in ARID1A, 2 in ARID1B, and 1 in SMARCA4. This more frequent than expected association between CSS and ARM indicates that some ARMs are most likely part of the CSS spectrum, especially for ARID1A-related CSS.

VACTERL Association in Patients With Metopic Synostosis: Is There a Link?

VACTERL association is diagnosed based on the non-random co-occurrence of at least 3 out of 6 congenital malformations. The prevalence is thought to be less than 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 40,000. There is no known link between VACTERL association and metopic synostosis in the literature. There were 122 operated cases of metopic synostosis at our institution from 1999 to 2023, with a 2.3:1 male-to-female ratio. The authors describe the co-occurrence of VACTERL association and metopic synostosis in 3 female patients with no identifiable genetic variants. Given that VACTERL association is a diagnosis of exclusion, other rare syndromes were considered but ultimately excluded. This suggests that the co-occurrence of VACTERL association and metopic synostosis is a potentially rare finding, and underlying pathogenic variants are yet to be identified.

Development of a Standardized Algorithm for Management of Newly Diagnosed Anorectal Malformations

Neonates with a new diagnosis of anorectal malformation (ARM) present a unique challenge to the clinical team. ARM is strongly associated with additional midline malformations, such as those observed in the VACTERL sequence, including vertebral, cardiac, and renal malformations. Timely assessment is necessary to identify anomalies requiring intervention and to prevent undue stress and delayed treatment. We utilized a multidisciplinary team to develop an algorithm guiding the midline workup of patients newly diagnosed with ARM. Patients were included if born in or transferred to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), or if seen in clinic within one month of life. Complete imaging was defined as an echocardiogram, renal ultrasound, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound within the first month of life. We compared three periods: prior to implementation (2010-2014), adoption period (2015), and delayed implementation (2022); p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Rates of complete imaging significantly improved from pre-implementation to delayed implementation (65.2% vs. 50.0% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.0003); the most growth was observed in spinal imaging (71.0% vs. 90.0% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.001). While there were no differences in the rates of identified anomalies, there were fewer missed diagnoses with the algorithm (10.0% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.05). We demonstrate that the implementation of a standardized algorithm can significantly increase appropriate screening for anomalies associated with a new diagnosis of ARM and can decrease delayed diagnosis. Further qualitative studies will help to refine and optimize the algorithm moving forward.

Treatment of Anorectal Malformations in German Hospitals: Analysis of National Hospital Discharge Data from 2016 to 2021

BACKGROUND

 Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are complex congenital anomalies. The corrective operation is demanding and schedulable. Based on complete national data, patterns of care have not been analyzed in Germany yet.

METHODS

 All cases with ARM were analyzed (1) at the time of birth and (2) during the hospital stay for the corrective operation, based on the national hospital discharge data (DRG statistics). Patient's comorbidities, treatment characteristics, hospital structures, and the outcome of corrective operations were analyzed with respect to the hospitals' caseload.

RESULTS

 From 2016 to 2021, 1,726 newborns with ARM were treated at the time of birth in 388 hospitals. Of these hospitals, 19% had neither a pediatric nor a pediatric surgical department. At least one additional congenital anomaly was present in 49% of cases and 7% of the newborns had a birthweight below 1,500 g.In all, 2,060 corrective operations for ARM were performed in 113 hospitals in the same time period. In 24.5% of cases, at least one major complication was documented. One-third of the operations were performed in 56 hospitals, one-third in 20 hospitals, and one-third in 10 hospitals with median annual case numbers of 2, 5, and 10, respectively.Hospitals with the highest caseload operated cloacal defects more often than hospitals with the lowest caseload (7 vs. 2%) and had more early complications than hospitals with the lowest caseload (30 vs. 21%). This difference was not statistically significant after risk adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

 Children with ARM are multimorbid. Early complications after corrective surgery are common. Considering the large number of hospitals with a very low caseload, centralization of care for the complex and elective corrective surgery for ARM remains a key issue for quality of care.

Survival and factors associated with mortality among infants with anorectal malformation: a population-based study from a middle-income country

Limited data on the survival of anorectal malformation (ARM) patients from lower- and middle-income countries is available. This retrospective population-based study from the State of Johor, Malaysia, determines the incidence, mortality rate, and survival of ARM patients and factors associated with mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the survival of ARM patients at 1, 5, and 10 years. In addition, multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze mortality-related factors. There were 175 ARM patients among 803,850 live births, giving an overall ARM incidence of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 2.5) per 10,000 live births. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. There were 122 (69%) non-isolated ARM, of which 41 were Trisomy-21 and 34 had VACTERL association. Seventy-three (42%) had congenital heart disease (CHD), with 38 severe and 35 non-severe CHD. Overall, 33 (19%) patients died, with a median age of death of 5.7 months (interquartile range (IQR) 25 days to 11.2 months). The overall estimated 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rate for ARM patients was 82% (95% CI, 76-89%), 77% (95% CI, 70-84%), and 77% (95% CI, 70-84%), respectively. Univariate analysis shows that non-isolated ARM, VACTERL association, and severe CHD were associated with mortality. However, only severe CHD is the independent factor associated with mortality, with a hazard ratio of 4.0 (95% CI, 1.9-8.4).  Conclusion: CHD is common among ARM patients, and one in five ARM patients had a severe cardiac defect, significantly affecting their survival. What is Known: • VACTERL association and congenital heart disease are common in patient with anorectal malformation. • Low birth weight and prematurity are associated with a lower rate of survival. What is New: • Congenital heart disease is common in ARM patients in a middle-income country. • Severe congenital heart disease plays a significant role in the survival of patients with an anorectal malformation in lower- and middle-income countries.

Anorectal Malformations: The Pivotal Role of the Good Clinical Practice

Anorectal malformations (ARM) without a fistula are a rare congenital condition. Although may seem more simple to repair compared with ARM with fistulas, surgery has proved to be challenging. We report the case of a newborn who presented a well-formed anus and normal genitalia; a blind-ending anal canal was detected after the insertion of a rectal probe, thus allowing the diagnosis of ARM. Anal probing straight after birth avoids the possible complications related to intestinal obstruction due to a missed diagnosis of ARM. Examination of the perineal region is an important step in the evaluation of the newborn and represents the tool for a prompt identification of ARM. Adding anal probing to accurate inspection perineum is a good clinical practice and should always be performed even in presence of a normal-looking perineum.

The Importance of Screening for Additional Anomalies in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In children with anorectal malformations (ARM), additional anomalies can occur within the VACTERL-association. Routine screening is of great importance for early identification and potential treatment. However, uniformity in screening protocols is lacking and only small cohorts have been described in literature. The aim of this study was to assess and describe a unique large cohort of ARM patients who underwent VACTERL screening in the neonatal period.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center cohort study was performed. Included were all neonates born between January 2000 and December 2020 who were diagnosed with ARM and screened for additional anomalies. Full screening consisted of x-ray and ultrasound of the spine, cardiac and renal ultrasound, and physical examination for limb deformities, esophageal atresia, and ARM. Criteria for VACTERL-classification were predefined according to the EUROCAT-definitions.

RESULTS

In total, 216 patients were included, of whom 167 (77.3%) underwent full VACTERL-screening (66% in 2000-2006 vs. 82% in 2007-2013 vs. 86% in 2014-2020). Median age at follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR 3.0-12.8). In 103/167 patients (61.7%), additional anomalies were identified. Some 35/216 patients (16.2%) fulfilled the criteria of a form of VACTERL-association. In 37/216 patients (17.1%), a genetic cause or syndrome was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ARM patients underwent full screening to detect additional anomalies (77%), which improved over time to 86%. Yet, approximately a quarter of patients was not screened, with the potential of missing important additional anomalies that might have severe consequences in the future. Forms of VACTERL-association or genetic causes were found in 16% and 17% respectively. This study emphasizes the importance of routine screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fertility concerns and outcomes in females with anorectal malformations

PURPOSE

To assess fertility concerns and to describe pregnancy outcomes in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM).

METHODS

This is an IRB approved, cross-sectional study of patients in the Adult Colorectal Research Registry who completed reproductive health surveys between November 2021 and August 2022. Patients assigned female at birth with age 18 or older and ARM were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with ARM, age 18 or older, were included. Fertility concerns were reported in 26 (40.6%) patients, 11 of which had seen a fertility specialist, including four who had not yet tried to conceive. Fertility concerns were highest amongst cloaca patients who had not yet tried to conceive (37.5%). 26 (40.6%) patients had tried to conceive, of which 16 (25%) reported fertility problems, most frequently uterine abnormalities and damaged or blocked fallopian tubes. 22 (34.4%) participants were able to conceive and 18 (28.1%) had at least one live birth. Patients with ARM who had concerns of fertility, had better FertiQoL when compared to published reference scores for patients experiencing fertility issues.

CONCLUSION

Providers should be aware of fertility concerns in patients with ARM. Proactive counseling with referrals to a fertility specialist should be considered in patients who desire future fertility.

State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Anorectal Malformations

Up to 79% of patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) experience constipation and/or soiling after a primary posterior sagittal anoplasty (PSARP) and are referred to a bowel management program. We aim to report the recent updates in evaluating and managing these patients as part of the manuscript series on the current bowel management protocols for patients with colorectal diseases (ARMs, Hirschsprung disease, functional constipation, and spinal anomalies). The unique anatomic features of ARM patients, such as maldeveloped sphincter complex, impaired anal sensation, and associated spine and sacrum anomalies, indicate their bowel management plan. The evaluation includes an examination under anesthesia and a contrast study to exclude anatomic causes of poor bowel function. The potential for bowel control is discussed with the families based on the ARM index calculated from the quality of the spine and sacrum. The bowel management options include laxatives, rectal enemas, transanal irrigations, and antegrade continence enemas. In ARM patients, stool softeners should be avoided as they can worsen soiling.

Spinal cord anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

First, to assess the number of spinal cord anomalies (SCA), specifically tethered spinal cord (TSC) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM), identified with spinal cord imaging (i.e. spinal cord US and/or MRI). Second, to report outcomes after TSC treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center study was performed. All ARM patients born between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Screening for SCA consisted of spinal cord US and/or MRI. Radiology reports were scored on presence of SCA. Data were presented with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 254 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 234 (92.1%) underwent spinal cord imaging. In total, 52 (22.2%) patients had a SCA, diagnosed with US (n = 20, 38.5%), MRI (n = 10, 19.2%), or both US and MRI (n = 22, 42.3%), of whom 12 (23.5%) with simple, 27 (52.7%) intermediate, and 12 (23.5%) complex ARM types. TSC was identified in 19 patients (8.1%), of whom 4 (21.1%) underwent uncomplicated neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

SCA were present in 22% of ARM patients both in simple, as well as more complex ARM types. TSC was present in 19 patients with SCA, of whom 4 underwent uncomplicated neurosurgical intervention. Therefore, screening for SCA seems to be important for all ARM patients, regardless of ARM type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for the optimisation of treatment and follow-up of patients with an anorectal malformation (ARM): The ARM and OUtcome Review (ARMOUR)-project

BACKGROUND

Primary treatment of an anorectal malformation (ARM) is surgical restoration of the anatomy. These children can experience many problems later in life; therefore, a long-term follow-up by an experienced team is needed. The aim of the ARM and OUtcome Review (ARMOUR-study) is to identify the lifetime outcomes that are important from a medical and patients' perspective and develop a core outcome set (COS) that can be implemented in a care pathway to support individual ARM management decisions.

METHODS

First, a systematic review will identify clinical and patient-reported outcomes described in studies conducted in patients with an ARM. Second, qualitative interviews with patients of different age categories and their caregivers will be held to ensure that the COS will include outcomes that are relevant from the patient's perspective. Finally, the outcomes will be taken forward to a Delphi consensus exercise. Using multiple web-based Delphi rounds, key stakeholders (medical experts, clinical researchers and patients) will prioritise outcomes. During a face-to-face consensus meeting, the final COS will be determined. These outcomes can be evaluated in a life-long care pathway for patients with ARM.

DISCUSSION

The development of a COS for ARMs aims to reduce heterogeneity in outcome reporting between (clinical) studies, enhancing the availability of comparable data, which will facilitate evidence-based patient care. Assessment of the outcomes in the COS during individual care pathways for ARM can support shared decisions regarding management. The ARMOUR-project has ethical approval and is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study level II.

Patient-reported physical and psychosocial significance of abdominal scarring in anorectal malformations

Background Abdominal scarring in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) is a permanent visible sign of a chronic congenital condition. The study's aims were to assess the physical and psychosocial significance of abdominal scarring in ARM and to propose a scar treatment approach. Methods A patient- and observer reported cross-sectional study of ARM patients with previous colostomies surgically treated 1997-2015 with minimum 4 years' follow-up after stoma closure. A maximum of 3 patient-selected scars per patient were evaluated by a) the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS; 11= no symptoms, 110=worst symptoms), b) pictorial scar treatment assessment by a plastic surgeon, c) questionnaire evaluation of the scarring's psychosocial aspects, bowel- and urinary function and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were presented in median (range) and percent (%), and Pearson's r was used to evaluate linear correlations. Ethical approval and written consents were obtained. Results Twenty-seven patients (48% females) aged 12 (5-24) years old were included. Two (1-3) scars were evaluated per patient with a median POSAS score of 44 (15-78). Six patients (22%) reported scar pain, five (19%) scar pruritus and nine (33%) affected behavior, e.g. always wearing full-covered clothing in public places. Higher (worse) POSAS score and increasing age correlated (r = 0.40, p = 0.04). According to the plastic surgeon's assessment, 21 patients (78%) were suitable candidates for surgical scar treatment, among whom eight patients (30%) requested scar treatment. Conclusions Postoperative abdominal scarring should require attention in clinical ARM follow-up programs including potential corrective plastic surgery for selected patients.

Birth prevalence of anorectal malformations in England and 5-year survival: a national birth cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the birth prevalence, maternal risk factors and 5-year survival for isolated and complex anorectal malformations.

DESIGN

National birth cohort using hospital admission data and death records.

SETTING

All National Health Service England hospitals.

PATIENTS

Live-born singletons delivered from 2002 through 2018, with evidence in the first year of life of a diagnosis of an anorectal malformation and repair during a hospital admission, or anorectal malformation recorded on the death certificate. Cases were further classified as isolated or complex depending on the presence of additional anomalies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Birth prevalence of anorectal malformations per 10 000 live births, risk ratios for isolated and complex anorectal malformation by maternal, infant and birth characteristics, and 5-year survival.

RESULTS

We identified 3325 infants with anorectal malformations among 9 474 147 live-born singletons; 61.7% (n=2050) of cases were complex. Birth prevalence was 3.5 per 10 000 live births (95% CI 3.4 to 3.6). Complex anorectal malformations were associated with maternal age extremes after accounting for other sociodemographic factors. Compared with maternal ages 25-34 years, the risk of complex anorectal malformations was 31% higher for ≥35 years (95% CI 17 to 48) and 13% higher for ≤24 years (95% CI 0 to 27). Among 2376 anorectal malformation cases (n=1450 complex) born from 2002 through 2014, 5-year survival was lower for complex (86.9%; 95% CI 85.1% to 88.5%) than isolated anorectal malformations (98.2%; 95% CI 97.1% to 98.9%). Preterm infants with complex anorectal malformations had the lowest survival (73.4%; 95% CI 68.1% to 78.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in maternal risk factors for isolated and complex anorectal malformations may reflect different underlying mechanisms for occurrence. Five-year survival is high but lowest for preterm children with complex anorectal malformations.

Healthcare Burden and Cost in Children with Anorectal Malformation During the First 5 Years of Life

OBJECTIVE

To identify cumulative 5-year healthcare costs and healthcare days in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) and to compare the cumulative 5-year healthcare costs and healthcare days in children with ARM with 3 control cohorts: healthy, premature, and congenital heart disease (CHD).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective case-control study using the Truven MarketScan database of commercial claims encounters between 2008 and 2017. The ARM, CHD, and premature cohorts were identified using a targeted list of International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology codes. The healthy cohort included patients without ARM, preterm birth, or CHD.

RESULTS

We identified 664 children with ARM, 3356 children with heart disease, 63 190 children who were born preterm, and 2947 healthy patients. At 5 years, the total healthcare costs of children with ARM ($273K, 95% CI $168K-$378K) were similar to the premature cohort ($246K, 95% CI $237K-$255K) and lower than the CHD cohort ($466K, 95% CI $401K-$530K, P < .001). Total healthcare days were similar in children with ARM (158 days, 95% CI 117-198) and prematurity (141 days, 95% CI 137-144) but lower than CHD (223 days, 95% CI 197-250, P = .02). In ARM, outpatient care (126 days, 95% CI 93-159) represented the largest contribution to total healthcare days.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with ARM accumulate similar healthcare costs to children with prematurity and comparable healthcare days to children with CHD and prematurity in the first 5 years of life. Outpatient care represents the majority of healthcare days in children with ARM, identifying this as a target for quality improvement and demonstrating the long-term impact of this condition.

Genetic Counseling and Diagnostics in Anorectal Malformation

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is a relatively frequently occurring congenital anomaly of hindgut development with a prevalence of 1 in 3,000 live births. ARM may present as an isolated anomaly, but it can also be associated with other anomalies, sometimes as part of a recognizable syndrome. After birth, much medical attention is given to the treatment and restoring of bowel function in children with ARM. Effort should also be given to studying the etiology of the ARM in these patients. This information is important to both the medical community and the family, because it can help guide treatment and provides information on the long-term prognosis of the patient and recurrence risk in the family.In this article, we will review the current knowledge on the (genetic) etiology of (syndromic) ARM and provide guidelines for (family) history taking and clinical and genetic studies of ARM patients and their families, which is needed to study the causal factors in an ARM patient and for genetic counseling of the families.

The Role of De Novo Variants in Formation of Human Anorectal Malformations

Anorectal malformations (ARM) represent a rare birth defect of the hindgut that occur in approximately 1 in 3000 live births. Around 60% of ARM occur with associated anomalies including defined genetic syndromes and associations with chromosomal aberrations. The etiology of ARM is heterogeneous, with the individual environmental or genetic risk factors remaining unknown for the majority of cases. The occurrence of familial ARM and previous epidemiologic analysis suggest autosomal dominant inheritance in a substantial subset of ARM patients. The implicated mortality and reduced fecundity in patients with ARM would lead to allele loss. However, mutational de novo events among the affected individuals could compensate for the evolutionary pressure. With the implementation of exome sequencing, array-based molecular karyotyping and family-based rare variant analyses, the technologies are available to identify the respective factors. This review discusses the identification of disease-causing variants among individuals with ARM. It highlights the role of mutational de novo events.

Exome survey of individuals affected by VATER/VACTERL with renal phenotypes identifies phenocopies and novel candidate genes

The acronym VATER/VACTERL refers to the rare nonrandom association of the following component features (CFs): vertebral defects (V), anorectal malformations (ARM) (A), cardiac anomalies (C), tracheoesophageal fistula with or without esophageal atresia (TE), renal malformations (R), and limb anomalies (L). For the clinical diagnosis, the presence of at least three CFs is required, individuals presenting with only two CFs have been categorized as VATER/VACTERL-like. The majority of VATER/VACTERL individuals displays a renal phenotype. Hitherto, variants in FGF8, FOXF1, HOXD13, LPP, TRAP1, PTEN, and ZIC3 have been associated with the VATER/VACTERL association; however, large-scale re-sequencing could only confirm TRAP1 and ZIC3 as VATER/VACTERL disease genes, both associated with a renal phenotype. In this study, we performed exome sequencing in 21 individuals and their families with a renal VATER/VACTERL or VATER/VACTERL-like phenotype to identify potentially novel genetic causes. Exome analysis identified biallelic and X-chromosomal hemizygous potentially pathogenic variants in six individuals (29%) in B9D1, FREM1, ZNF157, SP8, ACOT9, and TTLL11, respectively. The online tool GeneMatcher revealed another individual with a variant in ZNF157. Our study suggests six biallelic and X-chromosomal hemizygous VATER/VACTERL disease genes implicating all six genes in the expression of human renal malformations.

Case Report: A Case Series of Rare High-Type Anorectal Malformations With Perineal Fistula: Beware of Urethral Involvement

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the more common congenital anomalies encountered in pediatric surgery where the majority are diagnosed in the early neonatal period. The etiology of ARM remains uncertain and is likely to be multifactorial. A majority of ARMs result from abnormal development of the urorectal septum in early fetal life. There can be a broad range of presentation features varying from low anomalies with perineal fistula to high anomalies mandating intricate management. To develop a standardized system for comparison in follow-up studies, the Krickenbeck classification was introduced according to the type of fistula. According to the Krickenbeck classification of ARM, those with a rectoperineal fistula are classified as low-type ARM and are usually managed with a perineal anoplasty without colostomy. In this case series, we describe two rare cases of distinct high and intermediate ARM with rectoperineal fistulas, which were thought to be low-type ARM but were subsequently found to have urethral involvement. Our cases consisted of high and intermediate ARMs, which were successfully treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as described. These cases exemplified rare variants of ARM where rectoperineal fistulas can be associated with high-type anomalies. Rare-variant ARM with rectopenile or rectoscrotal fistula can be associated with high-type anomalies in contrast to classical rectoperineal fistulas. A high index of suspicion should remain in cases with previous urinary tract infection despite normal imaging. Careful planning is also needed with consideration of possible need for urethral repair during anoplasty, which was needed in both our cases.

Long-term Functional Urinary and Sexual Outcomes in Patients with Anorectal Malformations-A Systematic Review

Context

Long-term urinary and sexual outcomes after repair of anorectal malformations (ARMs) are currently affected by concomitant malformations of the urinary tract and genitalia, sacral anomalies, and the surgical approach. However, the overall prevalence of urinary and sexual dysfunction remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of urinary and sexual dysfunction in patients aged >10 yr after repair of ARM in infancy.

Evidence acquisition

A systematic literature review was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Selected studies were reviewed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) criteria. We included studies reporting the prevalence of the following outcomes: urinary incontinence (UI), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), neurogenic bladder dysfunction (NBD), sexual dysfunction (SD), erectile dysfunction (ED), ejaculatory dysfunction, and birth rate. We initially identified 588 studies, of which 17 were included for evidence synthesis.

Evidence synthesis

A probabilistic meta-analysis on each subgroup revealed the following combined prevalence estimates: UI 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7-27%), LUTS/NBD 36% (95% CI 13-62%), SD among women 50% (95% CI 34-66%), ED 12% (95% CI 7-18%), ejaculatory dysfunction 16% (95% CI 9-25%), and birth rate 20% (95% CI 7-38%). Subgroup analysis showed a higher prevalence of ED and ejaculatory dysfunction among patients with high ARM severity when compared to low ARM severity.

Conclusions

Among patients undergoing ARM repair, we found a high prevalence of long-term impairment of UI, ED, and SD. We stress the need for larger multicentre trials with more comparable populations to optimise treatment and follow-up regimens.

Patient summary

We reviewed long-term outcomes for patients with anorectal malformations who underwent surgery and found that both urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunctions are common for both males and females.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal gastrointestinal system

In this paper the authors review the normal imaging appearance of the fetal gastrointestinal tract and patterns of fetal gastrointestinal tract obstruction. The authors include a detailed summary from esophagus to the rectum, including the expected pattern of meconium and small-bowel contents at different gestational ages. Common fetal gastrointestinal tract obstructions are reviewed with accompanying case examples, emphasizing the role of the meconium and bowel-caliber patterns in establishing differential diagnoses. This review also includes imaging pitfalls, complications of gastrointestinal tract obstruction, and implications for patient care.

The diagnosis of an imperforate anus in female fetuses

Imperforate anus is an anomaly caused by a defect in the development of the hindgut during early pregnancy. It is a relatively common congenital malformation and is more common in males. Although there are cases of a solitary imperforate anus, the condition is more commonly found as a part of a wider spectrum of other congenital anomalies. Although urgent reconstructive anorectal surgery is not necessary, immediate evaluation is important and urgent decompressive surgery may be required. Moreover, as there are often other anomalies that can affect management, prenatal diagnosis can help in optimizing perinatal care and prepare parents through prenatal counseling. In the past, imperforate anus was diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography based on indirect signs such as bowel dilatation or intraluminal calcified meconium. Currently, it is diagnosed by directly checking the perineum with prenatal ultrasonography. Despite advances in ultrasound technology, accurate prenatal diagnosis is impossible in most cases and imperforate anus is detected after birth. Here, we present two cases of imperforate anus in female fetuses that were not diagnosed prenatally.

Analysis of Associated Anomalies in Anorectal Malformation: Major and Minor Anomalies

BACKGROUND

Fifty to sixty percent of patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) have at least one associated anomaly (AA). We determined the incidence of AA with the subtypes of ARM classified in accordance with the Krickenbeck classification and analyzed differences in the incidence rates of major and minor AAs according to organ system.

METHODS

From January 1999 to May 2017, we retrospectively analyzed congenital anomalies in patients who underwent an anoplasty for ARM at our institution. The AAs were divided into nine organ systems. To analyze the difference in the incidence of AAs, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) using cases of perineal fistula as the base group.

RESULTS

Of the 460 patients, 256 (55.7%) were male, 299 (65%) had at least one anomaly, and 274 (59.6%) had major AAs. According to organ system, AAs were most common in the genitourinary (28%), cardiovascular (25%), and spinal/vertebral systems (22.6%). Major AA was most common in the cardiovascular (23%) and spinal/vertebral and genitourinary systems (19.3%). According to ARM subtype, AAs were common in the order of cloaca (93.9%), rectovaginal fistula (85.7%), and recto-bladder neck fistula (85%). For the incidence of AAs, cloaca (OR, 15.7) and recto-bladder neck fistula (OR, 5.74) showed significantly higher ORs. In the analysis of major AAs, the cloaca (OR, 19.77) showed the highest OR, followed by no fistula (OR, 4.78) and recto-bladder neck fistula (OR, 3.83).

CONCLUSION

A considerable number of patients with ARM had AAs. Our data are useful for predicting AAs in patients with ARM.

Correlation of anorectal manometry measures to severity of fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations - a cross-sectional study

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are a spectrum of anomalies of the rectum and anal canal affecting 1 in 2500 to 5000 live births. Functional problems are common and related to the type of ARM and associated malformations. We aimed to evaluate the results of Three-dimensional High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (3D-HRAM) in long-term follow-up after surgical correction of ARM with special reference to fecal incontinence. Twenty-one patients with anorectal malformations and primary repair at our center consented to participate in the study. Pressures of the anal sphincter muscles and defects were addressed by 3D-HRAM. Fecal incontinence and disease-specific quality of life were evaluated by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life score and Wexner incontinence score respectively. The study was approved by the Committee in Health Research Ethics and the Danish Data Protection Agency. Median age was 22(12–31) years and 13(67%) participants were females. Sphincter defect was present in 48% (N = 10) of participants. Participants with sphincter defects had significant higher Wexner score and size of sphincter defects and mean anal squeeze pressure were correlated to Wexner score. Participants with or without sphincter defects did not differ on manometry parameters including resting anal and squeeze pressure or disease-specific quality of life. In a study of the long-term outcome after repair of anorectal malformations we found a higher Wexner incontinence score in the presence of an anal sphincter defect and the size of the defect and mean anal squeeze pressure were correlated to the Wexner incontinence score.

Severe forms of Johanson-Blizzard syndrome caused by two novel compound heterozygous variants in UBR1: Clinical manifestations, imaging findings and molecular genetics

Johanson-Blizzard Syndrome (JBS) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder characterized by exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, distinct abnormal facial appearance and varying degrees of growth retardation. Variants in UBR1 gene are considered to be responsible for the syndrome. Here, we describe a 3-year old boy, who visited our clinic for severe growth retardation and frequent oily diarrhea. The physical examination revealed nasal alae aplasia, scalp defect, and maldescent of left testicle. Transabdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scan of his abdomen demonstrated complete fatty replacement of the pancreas. The clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings strongly suggest the diagnosis of hereditary pancreatitis. Whole exome sequencing revealed two rare compound heterozygous variants, c.2511T > G (p.H837Q) and c.1188T > G (p.Y396X), in the UBR1 gene of this boy, so, the diagnosis of JBS was established. This is the first report of Chinese patient with JBS, and our study indicates that transabdominal ultrasound and computed tomography are two useful and noninvasive imaging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of JBS, and identification of these two novel variants expands the database of UBR1 gene variants. Furthermore, with the availability of the identification technology for these variants, prenatal diagnosis could be offered for future pregnancies.

Quality of life and defecative function 10 years or longer after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

In our center, patients with anorectal malformation, including males with recto-vesical (RV)/recto-bladder neck (RBN)/recto-prostatic urethral (RU) fistulas, and females with recto-vaginal (RV) fistulas have been treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) before 2000, and by laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) thereafter. We would like to compare the quality of life (QOL) and long-term defecative function between these two groups of patients 10 years after reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LAARP between 2001 and 2005 were compared with historical controls treated with PSARP between 1996 and 2000. Degrees of continence were graded by the Krickenbeck classification and Kelly's score. QOL was assessed by Hirschsprung's disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life (HAQL) questionnaire. Results were compared using Chi-square test and t test.

RESULTS

There were 14 LAARP and 7 PSARP patients. All attained voluntary bowel movements. Moderate to severe soiling (Krickenbeck Grade 2 and 3) was found in 3/14 LAARP (21.4%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 1.00. Constipation requiring use of laxatives was present in 3/14 LAARP (28.6%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 0.62. Mean Kelly's scores were 3.79 ± 0.98 (LAARP) and 4.71 ± 1.25 (PSARP), p = 0.12. No patient required Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE). The QOL scores based on the HAQL questionnaire were comparable between the two groups in all areas except social functioning, in which the LAARP patients attained a significantly lower mean score (26.4 vs 71.7, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The 10-year outcome between LAARP and PSARP patients in terms of QOL and defecative function is comparable. Impairment in social functioning in these patients is reflected by the self-reported lower level of functioning.

The effectiveness of digital anal dilatation in preventing anal strictures after anorectal malformation repair

BACKGROUND

Anal dilatation is performed after repair of anorectal malformations(ARMs) and is vital in prevention of anal stricture formation. The ideal protocol utilizes Hegar dilators. In our setup, few parents will acquire Hegar dilators for home based anal dilatation but majority will use fingers as an alternative. The basis of this study was to determine the effectiveness of digital anal dilatations in preventing anal strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) which recruited children post ARM repair undergoing digital anal dilatation. The diameters of the digits used for anal dilatation were assessed for adequacy using the desired anal size as a reference point. The main outcome variable was the presence of anal strictures. Data were entered in a data collection sheet and analyzed by use of SPSS (V.21.0 Chicago, Illinois). Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to ascertain association among variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

50 patients with ARM post repair were recruited in the study. The rate of occurrence of anal stricture was 22%. Among the participants with anal strictures, only 27% were compliant to the dilatation regimen while 73% reported noncompliance. The mean diameter(mm) of the dilating digits at the level of the middle phalanx was Index finger (15.4 ± 0.58), middle finger (15.2 ± 0.61), ring finger (14.2 ± 0.71), small finger (12.5 ± 0.91) and thumb (17.6 ± 0.78). 46% of the participants were dilated with appropriately sized digits. The remainder had dilatations done with larger (22%) or smaller digits (32%). Notably, anal strictures occurred in participants who were dilated with inappropriately sized digits (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Digital anal dilatation is safe and effective as a mode of anal dilation in the setting of compliance to a strict dilatation protocol, daily frequency of dilations and use of appropriately sized digits. Owing to the variability in the finger size, we recommend that digits be calibrated and education given to the caregivers on the use of the appropriately sized digit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study. Level III.

Exome chip association study excluded the involvement of rare coding variants with large effect sizes in the etiology of anorectal malformations

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare congenital malformations, resulting from disturbed hindgut development. A genetic etiology has been suggested, but evidence for the involvement of specific genes is scarce. We evaluated the contribution of rare and low-frequency coding variants in ARM etiology, assuming a multifactorial model.

METHODS

We analyzed 568 Caucasian ARM patients and 1,860 population-based controls using the Illumina HumanExome Beadchip array, which contains >240,000 rare and low-frequency coding variants. GenomeStudio clustering and calling was followed by re-calling of 'no-calls' using zCall for patients and controls simultaneously. Single variant and gene-based analyses were performed to identify statistically significant associations, applying Bonferroni correction. Following an extra quality control step, candidate variants were selected for validation using Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

When we applied a MAF of ≥1.0%, no variants or genes showed statistically significant associations with ARM. Using a MAF cut-off at 0.4%, 13 variants initially reached statistical significance, but had to be discarded upon further inspection: ten variants represented calling errors of the software, while the minor alleles of the remaining three variants were not confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that rare and low-frequency coding variants with large effect sizes, present on the exome chip do not contribute to ARM etiology.

Outcomes of kidney transplants in pediatric patients with the vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, limb abnormalities association

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed kidney transplant outcomes in nine pediatric patients with VACTERL [vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, limb abnormalities] association-making this the largest study of its kind. Of 743 pediatric kidney transplant recipients at our center (1980-2017), nine had documented diagnoses of VACTERL association. All nine had congenital anorectal malformations and renal anomalies, five had vertebral defects, and one had a bifid thumb and tracheoesophageal fistula. Renal anomalies included dysplasia (n = 6), aplasia (n = 3), and horseshoe kidney (n = 2). Congenital lower urinary tract anomalies included neurogenic bladder (n = 6), obstructive uropathy (n = 4), anovesicular fistula (n = 1), rectourethral fistula (n = 1), and posterior urethral valves (n = 1). Age at transplant ranged from 1.2 to 15 years (mean, 7.3; standard deviation [SD], 5.5); 6 (67%) were male, and 3 (33%) were female; 6 (67%) had a living related donor, and 3 (33%) had a deceased donor. The overall graft survival rate was 78% (range, 1.5 to 25.2 years; mean, 10.5; SD, 8.9). One month post-transplant, one recipient died with a functioning graft. At 3.7 years post-transplant, one graft failed because of recurrent pyelonephritis. Post-transplant urologic complications included pyelonephritis (n = 6), vesicoureteral reflux (n = 5), and graft hydronephrosis (n = 4). We conclude that pediatric patients with VACTERL association can be safely transplanted-careful patient selection with vigilance and intervention for pre- and post-transplant urologic complications is essential.

Uncontrolled maternal chronic respiratory diseases in pregnancy: A new potential risk factor suggested to be associated with anorectal malformations in offspring

BACKGROUND

Chronic respiratory diseases and use of antiasthmatic medication during pregnancy may both play a role in the etiology of congenital anorectal malformations (ARM). However, it is unclear, whether the medication use or the underlying condition would be responsible. Therefore, our aim was to unravel the role of maternal chronic respiratory diseases from that of antiasthmatic medication in the etiology of ARM.

METHODS

We obtained 412 ARM patients and 2,137 population-based controls from the Dutch AGORA data- and biobank. We used maternal questionnaires and follow-up telephone interviews to obtain information on chronic respiratory diseases, antiasthmatic medication use, and potential confounders. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

We observed higher risk estimates among women with chronic respiratory diseases with and without medication use (1.4 [0.8-2.7] and 2.0 [0.8-5.0]), both in comparison to women without a chronic respiratory disease and without medication use. Furthermore, increased ORs of ARM were found for women using rescue medication (2.4 [0.8-7.3]) or a combination of maintenance and rescue medication (2.5 [0.9-6.7]). In addition, increased risk estimates were observed for women having nonallergic triggers (2.5 [1.0-6.3]) or experiencing exacerbations during the periconceptional period (3.5 [1.4-8.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the 95% CIs of most associations include the null value, the risk estimates all point towards an association between uncontrolled chronic respiratory disease, instead of antiasthmatic medication use, with ARM in offspring. Further in-depth studies towards mechanisms of this newly identified risk factor are warranted.

Associated anomalies in cases with anorectal anomalies

Anorectal anomalies (ARA) are common congenital anomalies. The etiology of ARA is unclear and its pathogenesis is controversial. Cases with ARA often have other non-ARA-associated congenital anomalies. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and the types of these associated anomalies in a defined population. The associated anomalies in cases with ARA were collected in all live births, stillbirths, and terminations of pregnancy during 29 years in 387,067 consecutive births in the area covered by our population-based registry of congenital malformations. Of the 202 cases with ARA, representing a prevalence of 5.21 per 10,000, 100 (49.5%) had associated anomalies. There were 7 (3.3%) cases with chromosomal abnormalities, and 31 (15.3%) nonchromosomal recognized dysmorphic conditions, including 17 cases with Vertebral defects, Anal atresia, Cardiac septal defects, esophageal atresia or TracheoEsophageal fistula, Renal anomalies and radial Limb defects association. Sixty two (30.7%) of the cases had nonsyndromic multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Anomalies in the urogenital, the musculoskeletal, the cardiovascular, the digestive, and the central nervous systems were the most common other anomalies in the cases with MCA. The anomalies associated with ARA could be classified into a recognizable malformation syndrome or pattern in 38 out of the 100 cases (38%) with associated anomalies. This study included special strengths: each affected child was examined by a geneticist, all elective terminations were ascertained, and the surveillance for anomalies was continued until 2 years of age. In conclusion, the overall prevalence of associated anomalies, which was close to one in two cases, emphasizes the need for a routine screening for other anomalies in cases with ARA.

Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2010-2014: A focus on gastrointestinal defects

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal defects are a phenotypically and etiologically diverse group of malformations. Despite their combined prevalence and clinical impact, little is known about the epidemiology of these birth defects. Therefore, the objective of the 2017 National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) data brief was to better describe the occurrence of gastrointestinal defects.

METHODS

As part of the 2017 NBDPN annual report, 28 state programs provided additional data on gastrointestinal defects for the period 2010-2014. Counts and prevalence estimates (per 10,000 live births) were calculated overall and by demographic characteristics for (1) biliary atresia; (2) esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula; (3) rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis; and (4) small intestinal atresia/stenosis. Additionally, we explored the frequency of these malformations co-occurring with other structural birth defects.

RESULTS

Pooling data from all participating registries, the prevalence estimates were: 0.7 per 10,000 live births for biliary atresia (713 cases); 2.3 per 10,000 live births for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (2,472 cases); 4.2 per 10,000 live births for rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis (4,334 cases); and 3.4 per 10,000 live births for small intestinal atresia/stenosis (3,388 cases). Findings related to co-occurring birth defects were especially notable for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula, rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis, and small intestinal atresia/stenosis, where the median percentage of non-isolated cases was 53.9%, 45.5%, and 50.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These population-based prevalence estimates confirm some previous studies, and provide a foundation for future epidemiologic studies of gastrointestinal defects. Exploring the genetic and environmental determinants of these malformations may yield new clues into their etiologies.

Healthcare Utilization and Comorbidities Associated with Anorectal Malformations in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine nationwide prevalence and healthcare utilization in children with anorectal malformations and associated anomalies over a 6-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the Kids' Inpatient Database for the years 2006, 2009, and 2012 for data collection. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify patients with anorectal malformations and associated anomalies.

RESULTS

A total of 2396 children <2 years of age with anorectal malformations were identified using weighted analysis; 54.3% of subjects were male. The ethnic subgroups were 40.1% white, 23.6% Hispanic, 9.3% African American, and 27% other ethnicity. Other congenital anomalies were reported in 80% of anorectal malformations and were closely associated with increased length of stay and costs. A genetic disorder was identified in 14.1% of the sample. Urogenital anomalies were present in 38.5%, heart anomalies in 21.2%, and 8.6% had vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula and/or esophageal atresia, renal anomalies, and limb defects association. Anorectal malformations with other anomalies including vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula and/or esophageal atresia, renal anomalies, and limb defects association incurred significant hospital charges when compared with anorectal malformations alone. The average annual healthcare expenditure for surgical correction of anorectal malformations and associated anomalies for the 3 years was US $45.5 million.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, major nationally representative study shows that majority of children with anorectal malformations have additional congenital anomalies that deserve prompt recognition. The high complexity and need for lifelong multidisciplinary management is associated with substantial healthcare expenditure. This information complements future healthcare resource allocation and planning for management of children with anorectal malformations.

A review of genetic factors contributing to the etiopathogenesis of anorectal malformations

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is a common congenital anomaly with a wide clinical spectrum. Recently, many genetic and molecular studies have been conducted worldwide highlighting the contribution of genetic factors in its etiology. We summarize the current literature on such genetic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature search was done using different combinations of terms related to genetics in anorectal malformations. From 2012 to June 2017, articles published in the English literature and studies conducted on human population were included.

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

A paradigm shift was observed from the earlier studies concentrating on genetic aberrations in specific pathways to genome wide arrays exploring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variations (CNVs) in ARM patients. Rare CNVs (including 79 genes) and SNPs have been found to genetically contribute to ARM. Out of disrupted 79 genes one such putative gene is DKK4. Down regulation of CDX-1 gene has also been implicated in isolated ARM patients. In syndromic ARM de novo microdeletion at 17q12 and a few others have been identified.

CONCLUSION

Major genetic aberrations proposed in the pathogenesis of ARM affect members of the Wnt, Hox (homebox) genes, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Gli2, Bmp4, Fgf and CDX1 signalling pathways; probable targets of future molecular gene therapy.

Epidemiologic analysis of families with isolated anorectal malformations suggests high prevalence of autosomal dominant inheritance

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare abnormalities that occur in approximately 1 in 3000 live births with around 40% of patients presenting with isolated forms. Multiple familial cases reported, suggest underlying genetic factors that remain largely unknown. The recurrence in relatives is considered rare, however transmission rates of ARM by affected parents have never been determined before. The inheritance pattern of ARM was investigated in our database of patients with isolated ARM.

RESULTS

Within our cohort of 327 patients with isolated ARM we identified eight adult patients from eight families who had in total 16 children with their healthy spouse. Of these ten had ARM, resulting in a recurrence risk of approximately one in two live births (10 of 16; 62%). From 226 families with 459 siblings we found two affected siblings in five families. Hence, the recurrence risk of ARM among siblings is approximately one in 92 live births (5 of 459; 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing the observed recurrence risk in our cohort with the prevalence in the general population, we see a 1500-fold increase in recurrence risk for offspring and a 32-fold increase if a sibling is affected. The recurrence risk of approximately 62% indicates an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. Reliable figures on recurrence of ARM are becoming increasingly important since improved surgical techniques are able to maintain sexual function resulting in more offspring of patients with ARM. These data allow more precise counseling of families with ARM and support the need for genetic studies.

Fetal MR Imaging of Gastrointestinal Abnormalities

Fetal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an increasing and valuable role in antenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of fetal gastrointestinal (GI) abnormalities. Advances in MR imaging data acquisition and use of motion-insensitive techniques have established MR imaging as an important adjunct to obstetric ultrasonography (US) for fetal diagnosis. In this regard, MR imaging provides high diagnostic accuracy for antenatal diagnosis of common and uncommon GI pathologic conditions. In the setting of fetal GI disease, T1-weighted images demonstrate the amount and distribution of meconium, which is crucial to the diagnostic capability of fetal MR imaging. Specifically, knowledge of the T1 signal intensity characteristics of fetal meconium, the normal pattern of meconium with advancing gestational age, and the expected caliber of small and large bowel in the fetus is key to diagnosis of abnormalities of the GI tract. Use of ultrafast T2-weighted sequences for evaluation of the expected location and morphology of fluid-containing structures, including the stomach and small bowel, in the fetal abdomen further aids in diagnostic confidence. Uncommonly encountered fetal GI pathologic conditions, especially cloacal dysmorphology, may demonstrate characteristic MR imaging patterns, which may add additional information to that from fetal US, allowing improved fetal and neonatal management. This article discusses common indications for fetal MR imaging of the GI tract, imaging protocols for fetal GI MR imaging, the normal appearance of the fetal GI tract with advancing gestational age, and the imaging appearances of common fetal GI abnormalities, as well as uncommon fetal GI conditions with characteristic appearances. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Previous miscarriages and GLI2 are associated with anorectal malformations in offspring

STUDY QUESTION

Are anorectal malformations (ARMs) associated with previous miscarriages or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4) and GLI family zinc finger 2 (GLI2) genes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The SNP rs3738880 in GLI2 and miscarriages were associated with ARM, especially in patients with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

ARM are one of the most common birth defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The etiology is likely to be multifactorial, involving both environmental and genetic factors. SNPs in BMP4 and GLI2 genes were associated with ARM in non-Caucasian populations. During a patient information day, several mothers of ARM patients reported their concerns about previous miscarriages.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A case-control study was performed among 427 ARM patients and 663 population-based controls.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We examined the associations of ARM with SNPs in GLI2 and BMP4 using DNA samples of the children and associations with previous miscarriages using parental questionnaires. In addition, gene-gene and gene-environment interaction analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The SNP rs3738880 in GLI2 was associated with ARM, especially in patients with MCA (homozygous GG-genotype: odds ratio (OR): 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.7). We identified previous miscarriages as a new risk factor for ARM, especially when occurring in the pregnancy directly preceding the index pregnancy and in patients with MCA (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3, 3.5). No association with rs17563 in BMP4, nor gene-gene or gene-environment interactions were found.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The possibility of recall errors for previous miscarriage, but we expect these errors to be limited, as a miscarriage is a major life event. In addition, potential misclassification regarding miscarriages and stillbirth, but sensitivity analyses showed that this did not influence our results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study showed associations of ARM with rs3738880 in GLI2 and with previous miscarriages. Both associations were stronger in patients with MCA, showing the importance of stratifying the analyses by patients with isolated ARM or MCA.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was funded by the Radboudumc. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Underlying genetic factors of the VATER/VACTERL association with special emphasis on the "Renal" phenotype

The acronym VATER/VACTERL association (OMIM #192350) refers to the rare non-random co-occurrence of the following component features (CFs): vertebral defects (V), anorectal malformations (A), cardiac defects (C), tracheoesophageal fistula with or without esophageal atresia (TE), renal malformations (R), and limb defects (L). According to epidemiological studies, the majority of patients with VATER/VACTERL association present with a "Renal" phenotype comprising a large spectrum of congenital renal anomalies. This finding is supported by evidence linking all of the human disease genes for the VATER/VACTERL association identified to date, namely, FGF8, FOXF1, HOXD13, LPP, TRAP1, and ZIC3, with renal malformations. Here we review these genotype-phenotype correlations and suggest that the elucidation of the genetic causes of the VATER/VACTERL association will ultimately provide insights into the genetic causes of the complete spectrum of congenital renal anomalies per se.

Outcome in anorectal malformation type rectovesical fistula: a nationwide cohort study in The Netherlands

PURPOSE

Outcomes of patients with an ARM-type rectovesical fistula are scarcely reported in medical literature. This study evaluates associated congenital anomalies and long-term colorectal and urological outcome in this group of ARM-patients.

METHODS

A retrospective Dutch cohort study on patients treated between 1983 and 2014 was performed. Associated congenital anomalies were documented, and colorectal and urological outcome recorded at five and ten years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 10.8years. Associated congenital anomalies were observed in 89% of the patients, 61% considered a VACTERL-association. Total sacral agenesis was present in 17% of our patients. At five and ten years follow-up voluntary bowel movements were described in 80% and 50%, constipation in 80% and 87%, and soiling in 42% and 63% of the patients, respectively. Bowel management was needed in 90% and one patient had a definitive colostomy. PSARP was the surgical reconstructive procedure in 83%. Urological outcome showed 14 patients (81%) to be continent. No kidney transplantations were needed.

CONCLUSION

In our national cohort of ARM-patients type rectovesical fistula that included a significant proportion of patients with major sacral anomalies, the vast majority remained reliant on bowel management to be clean after ten years follow-up, despite "modern" PSARP-repair. Continence for urine is achieved in the majority of patients, and end-stage kidney failure is rare.

Prevalence of Active Long-term Problems in Patients With Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations are a spectrum of congenital anomalies of the rectum with high infantile survival rates and variable outcomes. Long-term (>10 years old) active problems associated with this condition have been poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to systematically define the prevalence of the most common active long-term problems in patients with a history of anorectal malformation repair.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically using the OVID search platform.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles from August 1, 1994, to October 20, 2015, that included outcome data for patients aged ≥10 years with anorectal malformation. Cloaca was excluded from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Prevalence estimates of anorectal malformations were obtained from published articles. CIs were ascertained in the logit scale after transforming prevalence into log odds and were then transformed into the original scale. The same method was used for subgroup analysis investigating high and low anorectal malformations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The overall prevalences of fecal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 455 patients with a history of anorectal malformation repair were included for analysis. The range of reported prevalence of long-term active problems was as follows: fecal incontinence, 16.7% to 76.7%; chronic constipation, 22.2% to 86.7%; urinary incontinence, 1.7% to 30.5%; ejaculatory dysfunction, 15.6% to 41.2%; and erectile dysfunction, 5.6% to 11.8%.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective, small size; multiple complex associated anomalies often not reported; and heterogeneous composition of patients with limited stratification analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an overall high prevalence of active long-term issues in adolescents and young adults with anorectal malformations. Additional multicenter research is needed to define characteristics and predictors of long-term outcome, to implement effective follow-up, and to transition to adult health care.

Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Obstruction in Neonates and Infants:: A Critically Appraised Topic

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to critically appraise and compare the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities that are used for the diagnosis of upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract obstruction in neonates and infants.

METHODS

A focused clinical question was constructed and the literature was searched using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome method comparing radiography, upper GI contrast study, and ultrasound in the detection of upper GI tract obstruction such as duodenal atresia and stenosis, jejunal and ileal atresia, and malrotation and volvulus. The same methods were used to compare radiography and contrast enema in the detection of lower GI tract obstruction such as meconium plug syndrome, meconium ileus, Hirschsprung disease, and imperforate anus. Retrieved articles were appraised and assigned a level of evidence based on the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy of validity for diagnostic studies.

RESULTS

There were no sensitivities/specificities available for the imaging diagnosis of duodenal atresia or stenosis, jejunal or ileal atresias, meconium plug, and meconium ileus or for the use of cross-table lateral radiography for the diagnosis of rectal pouch distance from skin in imperforate anus. The retrieved sensitivity for the detection of malrotation on upper GI contrast study is 96%, and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus on upper GI contrast study is 79%. The retrieved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of malrotation with volvulus on ultrasound were 89% and 92%, respectively. The retrieved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of Hirschsprung disease on contrast enema were 70% and 83%, respectively. The retrieved sensitivity of invertogram for the diagnosis of rectal pouch distance from skin in imperforate anus is 27%. The retrieved sensitivities of perineal ultrasound and colostography for the diagnosis of rectal pouch distance from skin in imperforate anus were 86% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence for the imaging diagnosis of duodenal atresia and stenosis, jejunal and ileal atresias, meconium plug, meconium ileus, and imperforate anus, with recommended practice based mainly on low-quality evidence or expert opinion. The available evidence supports the use of upper GI contrast study for the diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus, with ultrasound as an adjunct to diagnosis. Contrast enema is useful in the investigation of suspected Hirschsprung disease, but a negative study does not outrule the condition. Colostography is the investigation of choice for the work-up of infants with complex anorectal malformations before definitive surgical repair.