A new DNA probe proximal to and closely linked to fragile X

Linkage relationships between DXS105, DXS98, and other polymorphic DNA markers flanking the fragile X locus

We report on linkage data between DXS105, DXS98, the locus for the fragile X syndrome (FRAXA), and 3 other polymorphic loci that flank the FRAXA locus. An analysis was undertaken to determine the relative positions of DXS105 and DXS98 and to test the assignment of DXS105 to a location proximal and closely linked to FRAXA. In this study of fragile X fra(X) syndrome families, the DXS105 locus was calculated to be proximal to FRAXA with a maximum lod score of 10.36 at theta = 0.08. DXS105 was also shown to be closely linked to the gene for factor IX (F9)(Z = 11.84 at theta = 0.08) and to DXS98 (Z = 4.91 at theta = 0.04). The order of the loci proximal to FRAXA is most likely centromere-factor IX-DXS105-DXS98-FRAXA-telomere. The use of DXS105 and DXS98 in clinical investigations should significantly increase the accuracy of risk assessment in informative fragile X families.

Linkage analysis in the fragile X syndrome using multiple distal Xq polymorphic DNA markers

Linkage data using the polymorphic loci F9, DXS105, DXS98, DXS52, DXS15, and F8 and the DNA probe 1A1 are presented from 14 families segregating for fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome. Recombination fractions corresponding to the maximum LOD scores obtained by two-point linkage analysis suggest that DXS98 (Zmax = 3.23, theta = 0.0) and DXS105 (Zmax = 2.09, theta = 0.0) are the closest markers proximal to FRAXA and that DXS52 is the closest distal marker (Zmax = 3.55, theta = 0.16). FRAXA is located within a 25 cM interval between F9 and DXS52, coincident with DXS98, on multipoint linkage analysis. Phase-known three way crossover information places F8 outside the cluster (DXS52, DXS15, 1A1). Confidence limits for the markers DXS98 and DXS52 are relatively wide (0.0-0.15 and 0.06-0.31, respectively), but when used in combination with cytogenetic examination offer improved carrier detection in comparison with cytogenetic analysis alone.

Detection of fragile X non-penetrant males by DNA marker analysis

Segregation analysis of the fragile-X [fra(X)] syndrome uncovered an unexpected 20% excess of normal males among sibships by Sherman et al. (Sherman SL, Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Turner G [1984]. Ann Hum Genet 48:21-37; Sherman SL, Jacobs PA, Morton NE, Froster-Iskenius U, Howard-Peebles PN, Neilsen KB, Partington MW, Sutherland GR, Turner G, Watson M [1985]: Hum Genet 63:289-299). This result predicts that about 17% (1/6) of normal sons of carrier fra(X) females will be non-penetrant. A way to test this prediction is by DNA markers. We analyzed DNA samples from 100 families with a set of flanking DNA markers linked to the fra(X) locus. Ten of 51 (19.6%) normal brothers, doubly informative and non-recombinant for flanking DNA markers, were found to be non-penetrant males. This result closely confirms the predictions of the segregation analysis indicating that about 1/6 of normal brothers are non-penetrant carrier males. The use of DNA markers to identify non-penetrant brothers and grandfathers can help to clarify the inheritance of the fra(X) mutation and be of considerable clinical usefulness. Using DNA markers, it was possible to study grandparental transmission in 71 of the families. In 39 families, DNA analysis confirmed the apparent pattern of inheritance. In 18 families, the grandparents had a single daughter with affected children. Of these, a new mutation at the time of their daughters' conception was possible in 15 and quite likely in 3. In 14 families with 2 or more daughters with affected fra(X) offspring, the grandparents had no affected sons or other relatives known to be positive for fra(X).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)