Vessels' morphology in SMAD4 and BMPR1A-related juvenile polyposis

Deciphering the clinical spectrum of gastric disease in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare hereditary autosomal dominant cancer-predisposition syndrome caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) located in SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes. Accurate clinical and endoscopic data regarding the evolution of gastric lesions remain sparse.

METHODS

Clinical, endoscopic, genetic, and pathologic data from patients with SMAD4 or BMPR1A PVs included between 2007 and 2020 in the French network on rare digestive polyposis (RENAPOL [French National Polyposis Register]) database were prospectively collected to address uncertainties regarding gastric involvement.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included: 25 (69.5%) had SMAD4 PVs, and 11 had BMPR1A PVs. For SMAD4 PV carriers, median age at inclusion was 43.0 years (range, 10-78 years). At baseline EGD, 22 (88%) of 25 patients exhibited at least 1 gastric juvenile polyp, and 5 (20%) of 25 had macroscopic signs of inflammatory gastritis. Early gastric disease was mostly located under the cardia, then progressed to the gastric antrum and body. During a mean follow-up period of 55.0 months, 12 of 25 patients had gastric disease progression (ie, new juvenile polyps [91.6%], diffuse gastric involvement [41.6%], inflammatory flat progression [25%]). Among 62 biopsies, low-grade dysplasia was observed in 5 (7.5%) samples from 2 patients. Nine carriers (36%) underwent gastrectomy (mean age, 47.2 years) due to diffuse gastric involvement or worsening clinical symptoms. Gastric adenocarcinoma (T1) was found in 1 gastrectomy specimen. Among the 11 patients with BMPR1A PVs, 2 had gastric hamartomatomas at baseline EGD, none with dysplasia or symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric involvement in JPS seems to be progressive over a lifetime, initiates in the cardia area, and mostly involves SMAD4 PV carriers.

Distinct gastric phenotype in patients with pathogenic variants in SMAD4: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Background and study aims  In most patients with juvenile polyposis Syndrome, it is possible to detect a pathogenic germline variant in SMAD4 or BMPR1A . It is well known that patients with a pathogenic variant in SMAD4 have a higher risk of gastric polyposis and gastric cancer compared to BMPR1A carriers, but the natural history of gastric involvement is poorly described. We aimed to systematically review endoscopic and histopathological gastric findings in Danish patients with pathogenic variants in SMAD4. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study including endoscopic and histological gastric findings in all known Danish patients with pathogenic variants in SMAD4 . The patients were identified by data from various registries as well as from clinical genetic departments and laboratories. Results  We identified 41 patients (2-72 years) with a pathogenic SMAD4 variant . In 31 patients, we were able to retrieve information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eighty-seven percent had at least one gastric abnormality including erythema (72 %) and edema (72 %). Half of the patients also had vulnerability of the mucosa and 68 % had gastric polyposis. An increasing frequency of abnormalities were observed with increasing age. Gastric cancer was diagnosed in 5 % of the cases and 22 % had a gastrectomy mainly because of massive polyposis. Conclusions  This study showed that most patients with pathogenic SMAD4 variants have a distinct phenotype of the gastric mucosa, and with an increasing severity in the elderly patients. These findings provide new insights into the natural history of gastric manifestations in patients with pathogenic SMAD4 variants.

A New SMAD4 Splice Site Variant in a Three-Generation Italian Family with Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by hyperplastic polyps in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract with a high risk of developing GI cancers. We have described a three-generation Italian family with all the spectrum of SMAD4 phenotype. A multigene panel test was performed on the genomic DNA of the proband by next-generation sequencing, including genes related to hereditary GI tumor syndromes. Molecular analysis revealed the presence of the c.1140-2A>G substitution in the SMAD4 gene, a novel splice variant that has never been described before. Our family is remarkable in that it illustrates the variable expressivity of the SMAD4 phenotype within the same family. The possibility of phenotype variability should also be considered within family members carrying the same mutation. In JPS, a timely genetic diagnosis allows clinicians to better manage patients and to provide early surveillance and intervention for their asymptomatic mutated relatives in the early decades of life.

Molecular and clinicopathological analysis of three cases of gastric juvenile polyposis

Background and Aim

Juvenile polyposis (JP) is a rare disease known to be associated with mutations either in SMAD4/BMPR1A. JP is known to often develop into malignant tumors, with a reported probability of 9–50%. However, the mechanisms of its carcinogenesis are not fully understood. We tried to elucidate the mechanisms of malignant transformation underlying this condition in three cases of gastric JP.

Methods

We selected polyps from each patient displaying varying degrees of atypia and their nearby normal polyps and compared them using immunohistochemistry, Sanger sequencing, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis of SMAD4, BMPR1A, and TP53.

Results

Two of the three cases were suspected of having germline SMAD4 mutations based on their familial medical histories; the remaining case was found to have a SMAD4 germline mutation following preoperative genetic testing. All three cases were shown to present with both SMAD4 positive and negative areas across each lesion, with the neoplastic lesions tending to show stronger nuclear SMAD4 expression. This expression was closely associated with the SMAD4 LOH status; however, we also noted paradoxical SMAD4 expression in the neoplastic lesions despite the biallelic inactivation of SMAD4 revealed in the genetic evaluation.

Conclusions

These data suggest that strong nuclear expression of SMAD4, even when seemingly paradoxical, seems to be closely associated with dysplastic polyps in JP. Complete inactivation of SMAD4 was not shown to be essential for the development of dysplastic polyps in gastric JP, and other pathways seemed to be involved in the acquisition of the malignant phenotype.

Juvenile polyposis diagnosed with an integrated histological, immunohistochemical and molecular approach identifying new SMAD4 pathogenic variants

Juvenile polyposis (JP) is a rare familial syndrome characterized by the development of numerous hamartomatous polyps of the gastrointestinal tract and by an increased risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers. It follows a pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance and is associated with germline variants of SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes. Differential diagnosis may be difficult based on histology alone, due to morphological similarities to other familial syndromes. Here we report a case of familial JP diagnosed in a 50-years woman with a familial history positive for gastrointestinal cancers and other tumor types. The patient presented with severe iron deficiency anemia and showed numerous polyps in the stomach and jejunum according to endoscopy and imaging. She underwent an intra-gastric laparoscopic removal of the major gastric polyp, followed by jejunal exploration and resection of a segment with multiple neoformations. Histological examination revealed the presence of hamartomatous polyposis. Gastric and intestinal samples were analyzed with next-generation sequencing. Molecular analysis showed that the patient harbored a germline splicing site variant of SMAD4, c.1139 + 3A > G, which was complemented by different somatic variants of the same gene in the different polyps. Immunohistochemistry for SMAD4 confirmed loss of protein expression in the polyps, with regular expression in normal cells. cDNA sequencing further confirmed the findings. We thus definitively diagnosed the woman as having JP thanks to an integrated approach based on histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. The identified variants, all previously reported as variants of unknown significance, were classified as pathogenic as they complemented each other leading to SMAD4 loss.

Gastrointestinal tract cancers: Genetics, heritability and germ line mutations

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers that arise due to genetic mutations affect a large number of individuals worldwide. Even though many of the GI tract cancers arise sporadically, few of these GI tract cancers harboring a hereditary predisposition are now recognized and well characterized. These include Cowden syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, hereditary pancreatic cancer, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP, serrated polyposis syndrome, and hereditary gastric cancer. Molecular characterization of the genes that are involved in these syndromes was useful in the development of genetic testing for diagnosis and also facilitated understanding of the genetic basis of GI cancers. Current knowledge on the genetics of GI cancers with emphasis on heritability and germ line mutations forms the basis of the present review.

Massive gastric polyposis associated with a germline SMAD4 gene mutation

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the development of multiple hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. Polyps are most common in the colorectum (98% of patients) and the stomach (14%). Causative mutations for JPS have been identified in two genes to date, SMAD4 and BMPR1A. SMAD4 mutations are associated with a higher incidence of gastric polyposis. In this case report, we describe two patients with massive gastric polyposis associated with a SMAD4 mutation. Both presented with anaemia and both had colonic polyps. Initial endoscopic findings revealed giant rugal folds suggestive of Ménétrier disease. However, as other possible gastropathies could not be differentiated on the basis of histology, a definitive diagnosis of JPS required additional mutation analysis. In patients with polyposis predominant in or limited to the stomach, establishing a diagnosis based solely on the pathological features of polyps can be challenging due to difficulties in differentiating JPS from other hypertrophic gastropathies. Mutation analysis should be considered early in the diagnostic process in cases of suspected juvenile polyposis, thus facilitating rapid diagnosis and adequate follow-up.

Pathology and Genetics of Syndromic Gastric Polyps

Gastric polyps are found in 1% to 4% of patients undergoing gastroscopy. The vast majority are sporadic, but some gastric polyps indicate an underlying syndrome. Gastric polyps can manifest in each of the gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes, including the recently described gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach syndrome. In addition, gastric polyps occur in Lynch syndrome and in a few rare conditions that are not primarily gastrointestinal. While some of these syndromes are clearly associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer, others are not. Interestingly, even in disorders with a well-established risk of gastric cancer, the neoplastic potential and the precursor status of these gastric polyps are not always clear. Although rare, recognition of syndromic gastric polyps is important for individual patient management. These conditions also serve as important models to study gastric homeostasis and gastric tumorigenesis.

Gastric Hamartomatous Polyps-Review and Update

Gastric polyps are frequently encountered on endoscopic examinations. While many of these represent true epithelial lesions, some of the polyps may result from underlying stromal or lymphoid proliferations or even heterotopic tissue. Histologic examination is essential for accurate typing of the polyps to predict malignant potential and underlying possible genetic abnormalities. The focus of this review is on gastric hamartomatous polyps, which are relatively rare and diagnostically challenging. Though most of the gastric hamartomatous polyps are benign, certain types are associated with increased malignant potential. These include certain polyps associated with specific genetic familial polyposis syndromes and gastric inverted hamartomatous polyps. Identification of these polyps can result in the prevention or early diagnosis of gastric carcinoma and also help in the identification of family members with polyposis syndromes. The aim of this review is to categorize gastric hamartomatous polyps and aid in the identification of high-risk categories.

Syndromic Gastric Polyps: At the Crossroads of Genetic and Environmental Cancer Predisposition

Gastric polyps occur in 1-4 % of patients undergoing gastroscopy. Although most are sporadic, some gastric polyps are part of an underlying hereditary syndrome. Gastric polyps can be seen in each of the well-known gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes, but also in Lynch syndrome and in several rare not primarily gastrointestinal syndromes. In addition, Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Proximal Polyposis of the Stomach (GAPPS) is a recently described heritable syndrome characterized by isolated gastric polyposis and risk of gastric cancer.Some of these syndromes are associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer, whereas others are not. However, the neoplastic potential and the precursor status of these gastric polyps are not always clear, even in syndromes with a well-established risk of gastric cancer. For instance, the neoplastic potential of Peutz-Jeghers polyps is debatable, despite the well-established risk of gastric cancer in this syndrome. Also fundic gland polyps and gastric foveolar-type adenomas in FAP carry a low risk of malignant transformation. In contrast, gastric juvenile polyps are precursor lesions of gastric cancer in juvenile polyposis syndrome through neoplastic progression of juvenile polyps in these patients.Although these hereditary syndromes with gastric polyps are rare, recognition is important for individual patient management. Furthermore, the initiation and progression of these lesions can be influenced by environmental factors such as Helicobacter Pylori infection. This makes these rare lesions an appropriate model for understanding the clonal evolution of early gastric cancer in the wider population.

Tumoral epithelial and stromal expression of SMAD proteins in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

SMAD proteins, intracellular mediators of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta pathway, function within two axes, the SMAD1/5/8 and SMAD2/3, connected to TGF-beta and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) ligands. The SMAD proteins of these two axes dimerize with SMAD4 and translocate to the nucleus. SMAD signaling is characterized by a dichotomic functioning, with tumor-suppressive functions and with loss of normal growth inhibitory responses, depending on the carcinogenesis stage. SMAD proteins also have pro-tumor effects including abnormal extracellular matrix production. Among tumors, pancreatic cancers harbor SMAD4 inactivation the most frequently and the SMAD proteins are considered to be key factors in pancreatic carcinogenesis.

METHODS

Our aims were to study the expression patterns of the different types of SMAD proteins in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas treated by surgical resection (without neoadjuvant treatment) and their correlations with morphological and clinical characteristics. We examined the immunohistochemical expression of SMAD4, SMAD1/5/8, and SMAD2/3 in 99 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Antibodies directed against the activated, phosphorylated forms of proteins were used when appropriate (SMAD1/5/8, SMAD2/3). Protein expression in the epithelial tumor cells and in stromal fibroblasts was analyzed with regard to morphological and clinical data.

RESULTS

Epithelial tumor cells showed SMAD1/5/8, SMAD2/3, and, SMAD4 expression in 13, 93, and 45 tumors, respectively, and stromal fibroblast expression in 5, 11, and 22 tumors, respectively. Epithelial SMAD4 was associated with a low, T1 or T2, TNM stage, and with the presence of an abundant stroma (p = 0.05 and <0.01, respectively). Activated stromal fibroblast SMAD2/3 expression was correlated with the presence of a fibrotic focus (p = 0.01), whereas fibroblast SMAD4 was related to a tendency for shorter postsurgical overall survival (p = 0.07). The relationship of stromal, fibroblast SMAD4 to a worse outcome attained statistical significance in the group of patients with T1 and with N1 stage tumors (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, SMAD protein expression in epithelial tumor cells or in stromal fibroblasts was related to stromal features and to a shorter postsurgical overall survival. Our results point out that the SMAD proteins play a role in the microenvironment of this highly fibrotic tumor type.

Identification of patients at risk for hereditary colorectal cancer

Diagnosis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes requires clinical suspicion and knowledge of such syndromes. Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer. Other less common causes include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), juvenile polyposis syndrome, and others. There have been a growing number of clinical and molecular tools used to screen and test at risk individuals. Screening tools include diagnostic clinical criteria, family history, genetic prediction models, and tumor testing. Patients who are high risk based on screening should be referred for genetic testing.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Juvenile polyposis syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by multiple distinct juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The cumulative life-time risk of colorectal cancer is 39% and the relative risk is 34. Juvenile polyps have a distinctive histology characterized by an abundance of edematous lamina propria with inflammatory cells and cystically dilated glands lined by cuboidal to columnar epithelium with reactive changes. Clinically, juvenile polyposis syndrome is defined by the presence of 5 or more juvenile polyps in the colorectum, juvenile polyps throughout the gastrointestinal tract or any number of juvenile polyps and a positive family history of juvenile polyposis. In about 50%-60% of patients diagnosed with juvenile polyposis syndrome a germline mutation in the SMAD4 or BMPR1A gene is found. Both genes play a role in the BMP/TGF-beta signalling pathway. It has been suggested that cancer in juvenile polyposis may develop through the so-called “landscaper mechanism” where an abnormal stromal environment leads to neoplastic transformation of the adjacent epithelium and in the end invasive carcinoma. Recognition of this rare disorder is important for patients and their families with regard to treatment, follow-up and screening of at risk individuals. Each clinician confronted with the diagnosis of a juvenile polyp should therefore consider the possibility of juvenile polyposis syndrome. In addition, juvenile polyposis syndrome provides a unique model to study colorectal cancer pathogenesis in general and gives insight in the molecular genetic basis of cancer. This review discusses clinical manifestations, genetics, pathogenesis and management of juvenile polyposis syndrome.

[Colorectal polyposis syndrome: a guide to diagnosis]

Biopsies and resection specimens of the gastrointestinal tract are a major part of the routine workload in many histopathology departments, whereby polypoid lesions are generally the main focus. In addition to distinguishing non-neoplastic from neoplastic polyps and evaluating the grade of dysplasia of the latter, the pathologist should always consider the possibility of an underlying polyposis syndrome. Not only have additional hereditary polyposis syndromes been identified in recent years due to a better understanding of their genetic and epigenetic alterations but also knowledge on well known polyposes has improved, leading to subtyping of various forms according to their different genotype. It is essential for the histopathologist to understand that the conventional histomorphology of individual polyps combined with information on the number and distribution of these lesions and clinical data can provide clues regarding a possible hereditary background. Therefore, the correct histological assessment of polyps is not just about getting the diagnosis right, it might also lead to genetic screening of family members and spouses.

Histologic variations in juvenile polyp phenotype correlate with genetic defect underlying juvenile polyposis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile polyps are distinct hamartomatous malformations of the gastrointestinal tract that may occur in the heritable juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) or sporadically. Histologically, juvenile polyps are characterized by a marked increase of the stromal cell compartment, but an epithelial phenotype has also been reported. JPS has an increased risk of colorectal cancer but sporadic juvenile polyps do not. In 50% to 60% of patients with JPS, a germline mutation of the transforming growth factor-β/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway genes SMAD4 or BMPR1A is found. This study compares the histologic phenotype of juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation and sporadic juvenile polyps.

METHODS

Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained slides of 65 JPS polyps and 25 sporadic juvenile polyps were reviewed for histologic features and dysplasia. Systematic random crypt and stroma counts were obtained by count stereology, and a crypt-stroma ratio was determined. All polyps were subsequently categorized as type A (crypt-stroma ratio <1.00) or type B (crypt-stroma ratio ≥1.00), the latter referring to the epithelial phenotype. Cell cycle activity was assessed using immunohistochemistry ofthe proliferation marker Ki67, and mutation analysis was carried out for KRAS and APC to determine the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

RESULTS

Juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 germline mutation were predominantly type B, whereas type A was more common among juvenile polyps with a BMPR1A germline mutation. However, this distinction could not be ascribed to differences in cell cycle activity. Dysplasia was equally common in JPS polyps with either a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation, in which the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence does not seem to play a distinct role.

CONCLUSION

Juvenile polyps in the setting of JPS exhibit distinct phenotypes correlating with the underlying genetic defect.

Lower gastrointestinal tract cancer predisposition syndromes

Although inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) has been suspected for more than 100 years, definitive proof of Mendelian syndromes had to await maturation of molecular genetic technologies. Since the l980s, the genetics of several clinically distinct entities has been revealed. Five disorders that share a hereditary predisposition to CRC are reviewed in this article.

Extracolonic manifestations of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes

Familial colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) accounts for approximately 15 to 20% of CRC. Of these, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) represent the most common hereditary syndromes associated with CRC, followed by other less common diseases including juvenile polyposis (JP) and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS). Extracolonic manifestations are common in each of these syndromes having significant implications for surveillance and management in at-risk individuals. The authors review the most common and clinically relevant extracolonic manifestations for each of these syndromes focusing on incidence, presentation, genotype/phenotype correlations, and management (including surveillance) strategies.

Role of Smad4 gene in the development of gastrointestinal cancer

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a multifunctional cell factor, which can inhibit the growth of most normal cells and cancer cells. Smad4 is a intracellular mediator of TGF-β, and it conducts TGF-β signal from cell membrane to the nucleus, and regulates transcriptions of the target genes. Researches have revealed that abnormal expression of Smad4 could cause precancerous diseases, induce carcinogenesis, and influence the biological features of tumor cells.

Increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression in juvenile polyposis syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastrointestinal juvenile polyps may occur in juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) or sporadically. JPS is an autosomal-dominant condition caused by a germline defect in SMAD4 or BMPR1A in 50% to 60% of cases, and is characterized by multiple juvenile polyps, predominantly in the colorectum. JPS has an increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancy but sporadic juvenile polyps do not. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is increased in gastrointestinal tumorigenesis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Inhibition of COX-2 leads to regression of colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients and inhibits gastrointestinal tumorigenesis. To investigate the role of COX-2 in juvenile polyps, we compared the expression of COX-2 in juvenile polyps from a well-defined group of juvenile polyposis patients and sporadic juvenile polyps.

METHODS

COX-2 expression was assessed in 24 genetically well-defined JPS patients and 26 patients with sporadic juvenile polyps using tissue microarray analysis. Two additional markers, Hu-antigen R, a stabilizer of messenger RNA, and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta, a transcription factor, both associated with increased COX-2 expression, also were investigated.

RESULTS

Increased COX-2 expression in JPS patients was noted compared with patients with sporadic juvenile polyps (P < .001). Also, JPS patients with a BMPR1A germline defect had higher COX-2 expression than did JPS patients in whom no germline mutation was detected. High COX-2 levels correlated with increased cytoplasmic Hu-antigen R expression in JPS polyps (P = .022), but not in sporadic juvenile polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Juvenile polyposis and sporadic juvenile polyps show distinctive expression profiles of COX-2 that may have clinical implications.

The rate of germline mutations and large deletions of SMAD4 and BMPR1A in juvenile polyposis

Juvenile polyposis (JPS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome that predisposes individuals to develop gastrointestinal polyps and cancer. Germline point mutations in SMAD4 and BMPR1A have been identified as causing JPS in approximately 40-60% of patients, but few studies have looked at the rate of large deletions. In this study, we determined the overall prevalence of genetic changes of SMAD4 and BMPR1A by sequencing and by screening for larger deletions. DNA was extracted from 102 JPS probands, and each exon and intron-exon boundary of SMAD4 and BMPR1A were sequenced. Coding and non-coding exons of SMAD4 and BMPR1A were screened for deletions with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). By sequencing, 20 probands had point mutations of SMAD4 and 22 of BMPR1A. By MLPA, one proband had deletion of most of SMAD4, one of both BMPR1A and PTEN, one of the 5' end of BMPR1A, and another of the 5' end of SMAD4. The overall prevalence of SMAD4 and BMPR1A point mutations and deletions in JPS was 45% in the largest series of patients to date. Large deletions are less frequent in JPS patients, but represent other heritable causes of JPS, which should be screened for in pre-symptomatic genetic testing.

Similar colorectal cancer risk in patients with monoallelic and biallelic mutations in the MYH gene identified in a population with adenomatous polyposis

A large proportion of non-FAP non-HNPCC patients with multiple colorectal adenomas have been reported to carry germline mutations on the MYH gene. Although the number of adenomas appears to be dependent on the number of mutated MYH alleles present in a patient, little is known on the relation of this number with cancer risk. Four hundred fifty-three APC-negative patients with more than five colorectal adenomas were screened for mutations on the entire coding sequence of the MYH gene. Pathogenic mutations were initially found in 74 patients without extradigestive tumors (22.5%) and subsequently in 75 at-risk relatives. Polyposis was more severe in cases with biallelic mutations. However, mutation copy number was correlated neither with the age at diagnosis of adenomas or adenocarcinomas, nor with the presence of a family history of colorectal tumors. Heterozygous and homozygous MYH mutation carriers were both at high risk for synchronous cancers (24% in colorectum and 16% in the upper gastrointestinal tract), but did not demonstrate an increased risk for extradigestive tumors. MYH-associated polyposis is a frequent inherited colorectal cancer predisposition with a strong dominance component. From age 25-30, MYH mutation carriers should be proposed an early screening program, which includes endoscopies of the upper digestive tract and the colorectum every 2 years.

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management

Hereditary forms of colorectal cancer, as is the case with virtually all forms of hereditary cancer, show extensive phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity, a phenomenon discussed throughout this special issue of Familial Cancer. Clearly, the family physician, oncology specialist, genetic counselor, and cancer geneticist must know fully the complexity of hereditary cancer syndromes, their differential diagnosis, in order to establish a diagnosis, direct highly-targeted surveillance and management, and then be able to communicate effectively with the molecular geneticist so that an at-risk patient's DNA can be tested in accord with the syndrome of concern. Thus, a family with features of the Lynch syndrome will merit microsatellite instability testing, consideration for immunohistochemistry evaluation, and mismatch repair gene testing, while, in contrast, a patient with FAP will require APC testing. However, other germline mutations, yet to be identified, may be important should testing for these mutations prove to be absent and, therein, unrewarding to the patient. Nevertheless, our position is that if the patient's family history is consistent with one of these syndromes, but a mutation is not found in the family, we still recommend the same surveillance and management strategies for patients from families with an established cancer-causing germline mutation. Our purpose in this paper is to provide a concise coverage of the major hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, to discuss genetic counseling, molecular genetic evaluation, highly targeted surveillance and management, so that cancer control can be maximized for these high hereditary cancer risk patients.

High proportion of large genomic deletions and a genotype phenotype update in 80 unrelated families with juvenile polyposis syndrome

BACKGROUND

In patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) the frequency of large genomic deletions in the SMAD4 and BMPR1A genes was unknown.

METHODS

Mutation and phenotype analysis was used in 80 unrelated patients of whom 65 met the clinical criteria for JPS (typical JPS) and 15 were suspected to have JPS.

RESULTS

By direct sequencing of the two genes, point mutations were identified in 30 patients (46% of typical JPS). Using MLPA, large genomic deletions were found in 14% of all patients with typical JPS (six deletions in SMAD4 and three deletions in BMPR1A). Mutation analysis of the PTEN gene in the remaining 41 mutation negative cases uncovered a point mutation in two patients (5%). SMAD4 mutation carriers had a significantly higher frequency of gastric polyposis (73%) than did patients with BMPR1A mutations (8%) (p<0.001); all seven cases of gastric cancer occurred in families with SMAD4 mutations. SMAD4 mutation carriers with gastric polyps were significantly older at gastroscopy than those without (p<0.001). In 22% of the 23 unrelated SMAD4 mutation carriers, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) was also diagnosed clinically. The documented histologic findings encompassed a wide distribution of different polyp types, comparable with that described in hereditary mixed polyposis syndromes (HMPS).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for large deletions raised the mutation detection rate to 60% in the 65 patients with typical JPS. A strong genotype-phenotype correlation for gastric polyposis, gastric cancer, and HHT was identified, which should have implications for counselling and surveillance. Histopathological results in hamartomatous polyposis syndromes must be critically interpreted.

Normal erythropoiesis but severe polyposis and bleeding anemia in Smad4-deficient mice

The tumor suppressor Smad4 mediates signaling by the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of ligands. Previous studies showed that several TGF-beta family members exert important functions in hematopoiesis. Here, we studied the role of Smad4 in adult murine hematopoiesis using the inducible Mx-Cre/loxP system. Mice with homozygous Smad4 deletion (Smad4(Delta/Delta)) developed severe anemia 6 to 8 weeks after induction (mean hemoglobin level 70 g/L). The anemia was not transplantable, as wild-type mice reconstituted with Smad4(Delta/Delta) bone marrow cells had normal peripheral blood counts. These mice did not develop an inflammatory disease typical for mice deficient in TGF-beta receptors I and II, suggesting that the suppression of inflammation by TGF-beta is Smad4 independent. The same results were obtained when Smad4 alleles were deleted selectively in hematopoietic cells using the VavCre transgenic mice. In contrast, lethally irradiated Smad4(Delta/Delta) mice that received wild-type bone marrow cells developed anemia similar to Smad4(Delta/Delta) mice that did not receive a transplant. Liver iron stores were decreased and blood was present in stool, indicating that the anemia was due to blood loss. Multiple polyps in stomach and colon represent a likely source of the bleeding. We conclude that Smad4 is not required for adult erythropoiesis and that anemia is solely the consequence of blood loss.

The patient with multiple intestinal polyps

The management of patients with multiple intestinal polyps may be difficult and greatly depends on the correct classification. Polyposis syndromes account for less than 1% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancers. In addition the risk for extracolonic cancer is increased in most syndromes. Here we report the case of a difficult patient with severe gastric polyposis and we present a review of polyposis syndromes such as classical and attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis as well as rare polyposis syndromes. The most practical approach for the diagnostic workup in patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal polyposis is based on the histological typing of polyps. In addition, a detailed family history regarding cancer, polyps and congenital abnormalities should be obtained from every polyposis patient. Patients with multiple adenomas are most likely to suffer from FAP, AFAP or MAP. Of these, younger age and higher polyp count are most likely a diagnosis of typical FAP. Older age and fewer polyps favour a diagnosis of AFAP or MAP. Germline testing of the APC gene is suggested, and if negative, MYH gene testing should be done. In patients with hamartomas, extraintestinal features should be evaluated and reference histology should be initiated. In addition panintestinal imaging should be performed with EGD, colonoscopy and small bowel imaging (PE, CE, and MR) enteroclysis. For diagnostic and therapeutic problems a familial colorectal cancer center should be consulted. Using this algorithm, correct classification and adequate treatment should be possible for every polyposis patient.

Allogeneic transplantation and the risk for transmission of genetic disease: the heritable cancer disorders

With the development of new approaches to transplantation therapy, such as those building upon the potential found in stem cells, it is vital to pursue a clear understanding of transplantation risks. Allogeneic transplantation presents risk for the transmission of disease of various types, including genetic disease. Predisposition to develop cancer is a feature of numerous genetic disorders, and it may be transmissible by transplantation. Some genetic disorders predisposing to cancer are remarkably common, either worldwide or in specific populations, and they could pose significant risk. Hence, to reduce risk to recipients, there is reason to exclude from donation those potential donors (including embryos) harboring certain germ-line mutations. However, the frequent absence of readily identifiable features might confound the effort to exclude those who harbor mutation. Thus, it is also important to consider the magnitude of risk that they represent. For some disorders, life-threatening cancer is highly likely to develop in those individuals born with germ-line mutation, but whether recipients would face the same risk from transplanted mutation is not always evident. Given the diversity of pathways that lead to cancer, there may be diverse factors that impact the likelihood for cancer to develop in the recipient, with some factors decreasing and others increasing the risk. One factor of special concern is the possibility that manipulation of donor cells, prior to transplantation, might introduce additional genetic or epigenetic abnormality, thereby increasing the risk.