1
|
Mbachu CNP, Mbachu II, Hagerman R. A Comprehensive Review of Fragile X Syndrome and Fragile X Premutation Associated Conditions in Africa. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:683. [PMID: 38927619 PMCID: PMC11203117 DOI: 10.3390/genes15060683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene and known to be a leading cause of inherited intellectual disability globally. It results in a range of intellectual, developmental, and behavioral problems. Fragile X premutation-associated conditions (FXPAC), caused by a smaller CGG expansion (55 to 200 CGG repeats) in the FMR1 gene, are linked to other conditions that increase morbidity and mortality for affected persons. Limited research has been conducted on the burden, characteristics, diagnosis, and management of these conditions in Africa. This comprehensive review provides an overview of the current literature on FXS and FXPAC in Africa. The issues addressed include epidemiology, clinical features, discrimination against affected persons, limited awareness and research, and poor access to resources, including genetic services and treatment programs. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the existing worldwide data for the diagnosis and treatment of fragile X disorders. This review will improve the understanding of FXS and FXPAC in Africa by incorporating existing knowledge, identifying research gaps, and potential topics for future research to enhance the well-being of individuals and families affected by FXS and FXPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chioma N. P. Mbachu
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi 435101, Nigeria
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Ikechukwu Innocent Mbachu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi 435101, Nigeria;
| | - Randi Hagerman
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The more you do it, the easier it gets: using behaviour change theory to support health care professionals offering reproductive genetic carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 31:430-444. [PMID: 36424524 PMCID: PMC9686264 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01224-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in genomic sequencing have improved the accessibility of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). As awareness and interest grows, non-genetic health care professionals are increasingly offering RGCS to consumers. We conducted a qualitative interview study informed by behaviour change theory to identify influences on health care professionals considered as 'early adopters' offering RGCS through Mackenzie's Mission, an Australian national research study investigating the implementation of free RGCS to couple's preconception or in early pregnancy. Interviews were deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to examine barriers and enabling factors. In total, we interviewed 31 health care professionals, who were primarily general practitioners (n = 23) offering RGCS through Mackenzie's Mission. Upon analysis, 15 barriers and 44 enablers to implementation were identified and categorised across three health care professional target behaviours 1. Engaging with RGCS, 2. Identifying eligible patients, and 3. Offering RGCS. Whilst all Theoretical Domains Framework domains were present, barriers were predominantly categorised as 'Environmental Context and Resources' e.g., lack of time, followed by 'Knowledge' e.g., lack of understanding about genetics and 'Beliefs about Capabilities' e.g., concern about giving high risk results to patients. Although health care professionals expressed a preference for offering RGCS through a comprehensive and supported model of care, such as Mackenzie's Mission, barriers remain. By understanding what drives current health care professionals' behaviour towards offering RGCS, behaviour change theory provides an avenue to direct future efforts based on evidence and improve service delivery.
Collapse
|
3
|
The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie's Mission): Design and Implementation. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111781. [PMID: 36579509 PMCID: PMC9698511 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) provides people with information about their chance of having children with autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, enabling informed reproductive decision-making. RGCS is recommended to be offered to all couples during preconception or in early pregnancy. However, cost and a lack of awareness may prevent access. To address this, the Australian Government funded Mackenzie’s Mission—the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project. Mackenzie’s Mission aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of an easily accessible RGCS program, provided free of charge to the participant. In study Phase 1, implementation needs were mapped, and key study elements were developed. In Phase 2, RGCS is being offered by healthcare providers educated by the study team. Reproductive couples who provide consent are screened for over 1200 genes associated with >750 serious, childhood-onset genetic conditions. Those with an increased chance result are provided comprehensive genetic counseling support. Reproductive couples, recruiting healthcare providers, and study team members are also invited to complete surveys and/or interviews. In Phase 3, a mixed-methods analysis will be undertaken to assess the program outcomes, psychosocial implications and implementation considerations alongside an ongoing bioethical analysis and a health economic evaluation. Findings will inform the implementation of an ethically robust RGCS program.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xi H, Xie W, Chen J, Tang W, Deng X, Li H, Peng Y, Wang D, Yang S, Zhang Y, Duan R, Fang J, Wang H. Implementation of fragile X syndrome carrier screening during prenatal diagnosis: A pilot study at a single center. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2021; 9:e1711. [PMID: 34057320 PMCID: PMC8372084 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability. Prenatal screening of FXS allows for early identification and intervention. The present study explored the feasibility of FXS carrier screening during prenatal diagnosis for those who were not offered screening early in pregnancy or prior to conception. Methods Pregnant women to be offered amniotic fluid testing were recruited for the free voluntary carrier screening at a single center between August, 2017 and September, 2019. The number of CGG repeats in the 5’ un‐translated region of the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 (FMR1) was determined. Results 4286 of 7000 (61.2%) pregnant women volunteered for the screening. Forty (0.93%), five (0.11%), and three (0.07%) carriers for intermediate mutation (45–54 repeats), premutation (55–200 repeats) and full mutation (>200 repeats) of the FMR1 gene were identified respectively. None of the detected premutation alleles were inherited by the fetuses. Of the three full mutation carrier mothers, all had a family history and one transmitted a full mutation allele to her male fetus. Conclusion Implementation of FXS carrier screening during prenatal diagnosis may be considered for the need to increase screening for FXS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xi
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wanqin Xie
- NHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wanglan Tang
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiuli Deng
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hua Li
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ying Peng
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shuting Yang
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yanan Zhang
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ranhui Duan
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences & Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Junqun Fang
- Department of Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics & the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allen EG, Charen K, Hipp HS, Shubeck L, Amin A, He W, Nolin SL, Glicksman A, Tortora N, McKinnon B, Shelly KE, Sherman SL. Refining the risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) by FMR1 CGG repeat size. Genet Med 2021; 23:1648-1655. [PMID: 33927378 PMCID: PMC8460441 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Approximately 20–30% of women with an FMR1 premutation experience fragile X–associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI); however, current risk estimates based on repeat size only identify women with the midrange of repeats to be at the highest risk. Methods To better understand the risk by repeat size, we collected self-reported reproductive histories on 1,668 women and divided them into high-resolution repeat size bins of ~5 CGG repeats to determine a more accurate risk for FXPOI in relation to CGG repeat length. Results As previously reported, women with 70–100 CGG repeats were at the highest risk for FXPOI using various statistical models to compare average age at menopause and risk of FXPOI, with women with 85–89 repeats being at the highest risk. Importantly, women with <65 repeats or >120 repeats did not have a significantly increased risk for FXPOI compared to women with <45 repeats. Conclusion Using a large cross-section study on 1,668 women, we have provided more personalized risk assessment for FXPOI using high-resolution repeat size bins. Understanding the variability in risk has important implications for family planning and overall health among women with a premutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Graves Allen
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Krista Charen
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Heather S Hipp
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lisa Shubeck
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ashima Amin
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Weiya He
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah L Nolin
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Anne Glicksman
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Tortora
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Bonnie McKinnon
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Katharine E Shelly
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie L Sherman
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Best S, Long J, Theodorou T, Hatem S, Lake R, Archibald A, Freeman L, Braithwaite J. Health practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to the implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:708-719. [PMID: 33533079 PMCID: PMC8252081 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background As interest in reproductive genetic carrier screening rises, with increased availability, the role of healthcare practitioners is central in guiding uptake aligned with a couples' values and beliefs. Therefore, practitioners' views on implementation are critical to the success of any reproductive genetic carrier screening programme. Aim To explore healthcare practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to implementation. Materials & Methods We undertook a systematic review of the literature searching seven databases using health practitioner, screening and implementation terms returning 490 articles. Results Screening led to the inclusion of 26 articles for full‐text review. We found three interconnected themes relating to reproductive genetic carrier screening: (i) use and impact, (ii) practitioners' beliefs and expectations and (iii) resources. Discussion Barriers and enablers to implementation were present within each theme and grouping these determinants by (a) community for example lack of public interest, (b) practitioner for example lack of practitioner time and (c) organisation for example lack of effective metrics, reveals a preponderance of practitioner barriers and organisational enablers. Linking barriers with potential enablers leaves several barriers unresolved (e.g., costs for couples) implying additional interventions may be required. Conclusion Future research should draw on the findings from this study to develop and test strategies to facilitate appropriate offering of reproductive genetic carrier screening by healthcare practitioners. What is already known?Availability of reproductive genetic carrier screening is rising. Screening is often focused on ethnically specific conditions or for those with a family history of disease. Commonly, carriers do not have family history of disease.
What does this review add?Identifies practitioner barriers to implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening, for example, beliefs and expectations. Matches identified practitioner barriers to enablers to implementation. Highlights where additional implementation support is required, for example, lack of practitioner confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Best
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janet Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tahlia Theodorou
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Hatem
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lake
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucinda Freeman
- Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boardman FK. Attitudes toward population screening among people living with fragile X syndrome in the UK: 'I wouldn't wish him away, I'd just wish his fragile X syndrome away'. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:85-97. [PMID: 33184995 PMCID: PMC7894324 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
In an age of expanded genetic screening, fragile X syndrome is increasingly considered a candidate condition, given its prevalence, the absence of curative interventions, and its impact on families. However, relatively little research has explored the views of families and people living with fragile X syndrome toward population screening. This study reports on in-depth interviews with 19 participants: 3 with people diagnosed with a fragile X condition (fragile X syndrome = 2, FXTAS = 1) and 16 people with fragile X syndrome in their family (11 parents, 2 grandparents, 1 spouse, 1 sibling, and 1 aunt) living in the UK. This study reveals the complexity of attitudes within this group and the existence of genuine ambivalence toward different population screening programs. While the overwhelming majority believed that preconception and newborn genetic screening should be made available to the general public, the notion of prenatal screening was far more controversial, with only five participants expressing support for such a program. Expressivist concerns were highlighted equally both by those who supported prenatal screening, as by also those who did not. Participants who supported prenatal screening drew clear distinctions between people with fragile X syndrome and the condition itself, in order to neutralize expressivist concerns and existential threat. However, for others, this division was challenging to maintain. Impairment effects associated with fragile X syndrome, more specifically, its implications for behavior, intellect, and personality, made it harder for some participants to conceptually separate the person from their condition. This study concludes that screening remains a complex issue for families living with genetic conditions and that expressivist concerns affect, and are managed by, families living with different types of disability in contrasting ways. Screening for conditions that affect personality, behavior, and intellect produces unique iterations of expressivism, identity, and stigmatization that families produce specific, and creative, strategies to navigate.
Collapse
|
8
|
Johansen Taber K, Lim-Harashima J, Naemi H, Goldberg J. Fragile X syndrome carrier screening accompanied by genetic consultation has clinical utility in populations beyond those recommended by guidelines. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 7:e1024. [PMID: 31694075 PMCID: PMC6900367 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability. Many providers offer preconception or prenatal FXS carrier screening. However, guidelines recommend screening only for those with a family history or undergoing fertility evaluation. Wider screening has been resisted because of concerns about patient understanding of FXS‐associated inheritance patterns and phenotypes. Additionally, the clinical utility has been questioned. Methods We addressed these concerns by analyzing reproductive decision‐making and pregnancy management informed by post‐test genetic consultation among 122 FMR1 premutation carriers identified by expanded carrier screening. Results Sixty‐three percent of those screened met guidelines screening criteria; the remaining 37% did not. Ninety‐eight percent had undergone post‐test genetic consultation. Of respondents screened preconceptionally, 74% reported planning or pursuing actions to reduce the risk of an affected pregnancy; the extent to which couples planned/pursued these actions was not significantly different between those meeting either screening criterion (76%) versus those meeting neither criterion (55%). Of respondents screened prenatally, 41% pursued prenatal diagnostic testing; the extent to which couples pursued prenatal diagnosis was not significantly different between those who met either screening criterion (37%) versus those who met neither criterion (31%). Conclusion These results support the expansion of FXS screening criteria in guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jim Goldberg
- Myriad Women's Health, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boardman FK, Hale R, Gohel R, Young PJ. Preventing lives affected by hemophilia: A mixed methods study of the views of adults with hemophilia and their families toward genetic screening. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 7:e618. [PMID: 30838796 PMCID: PMC6503017 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic sequencing technologies have made the possibility of population screening for whole panels of genetic disorders more feasible than ever before. As one of the most common single gene disorders affecting the UK population, hemophilia is an attractive candidate to include on such screening panels. However, very little is known about views toward genetic screening amongst people with hemophilia or their family members, despite the potential for a wide range of impacts on them. Methods Twenty‐two in‐depth qualitative interviews were undertaken to explore the views of adults with hemophilia and their family members, recruited through the Haemophilia Society UK. These interviews were used to develop a survey, the Haemophilia Screening Survey (UK), which was distributed in paper and online format through the support group, receiving 327 returns between January and June 2018. Results Fifty‐seven per cent of the sample supported preconception carrier screening of the population for hemophilia, and 59% supported prenatal carrier screening. Key reasons for support included a desire to reduce pregnancy terminations and increase awareness of hemophilia. Despite support for screening however, 90% of the sample disagreed with pregnancy terminations for hemophilia. Conclusions Families and adults living with hemophilia are more supportive of screening for information and preparation purposes than to prevent boys with hemophilia from being born. A distinction was made between preventing the disease and preventing the lives of people with it, with support shown for the use of screening to achieve the former, but not at the expense of the latter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Hale
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Raksha Gohel
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Philip J Young
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, and spinal muscular atrophy in Australia: outcomes of 12,000 tests. Genet Med 2017; 20:513-523. [PMID: 29261177 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo describe our experience of offering simultaneous genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF), fragile X syndrome (FXS), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).MethodsCarrier screening is offered through general practice, obstetrics, fertility, and genetics settings before or in early pregnancy. Carriers are offered genetic counseling with prenatal/preimplantation genetic diagnosis available to those at increased risk.ResultsScreening of 12,000 individuals revealed 610 carriers (5.08%; 1 in 20): 342 CF, 35 FXS, 241 SMA (8 carriers of 2 conditions), approximately 88% of whom had no family history. At least 94% of CF and SMA carriers' partners were tested. Fifty couples (0.42%; 1 in 240) were at increased risk of having a child with one of the conditions (14 CF, 35 FXS, and 1 SMA) with 32 pregnant at the time of testing. Of these, 26 opted for prenatal diagnosis revealing 7 pregnancies affected (4 CF, 2 FXS, 1 SMA).ConclusionThe combined affected pregnancy rate is comparable to the population risk for Down syndrome, emphasizing the need to routinely offer carrier screening. The availability of appropriate genetic counseling support and a collaborative approach between laboratory teams, genetics services, health professionals offering screening, and support organizations is essential.
Collapse
|
11
|
Metcalfe SA, Martyn M, Ames A, Anderson V, Archibald AD, Couns GDG, Carter R, Cohen J, Cotter M, GenCouns M, Dang W, Delatycki MB, Donath S, Edwards S, Educ PGD, Couns GDG, Forbes R, Couns GDG, Gavrila M, MedSci M, Halliday J, Hickerton C, Hill M, Couns GDG, Jacobs L, Ultrasound PGD, Petrou V, Couns GDG, Plunkett L, GenCouns M, Sheffield L, Racp F, Thornton A, Couns GDG, Younie S, Econ PGDH, Emery JD. Informed decision making and psychosocial outcomes in pregnant and nonpregnant women offered population fragile X carrier screening. Genet Med 2017; 19:1346-1355. [PMID: 28661491 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposePopulation-based carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS) is still not universally endorsed by professional organizations due to concerns around genetic counseling for complex information and potential for psychosocial harms.MethodsWe determined uptake levels, decision making, and psychosocial impact in a prospective study of pregnant and nonpregnant Australian women offered FXS carrier screening in clinical settings. Women received pretest genetic counseling, and completed questionnaires when deciding and one month later.ResultsOf 1,156 women recruited, 83.1% returned the first questionnaire with 70.6% nonpregnant and 58.8% pregnant women choosing testing (χ2=16.98, P<0.001). Overall, informed choice was high in both nonpregnant (77.4%) and pregnant (72.9%) women (χ2=0.21, P=0.644), and more tested (76.0%) than not-tested (66.7%) women (χ2=6.35, P=0.012) made an informed choice. Measures of depression, stress, and anxiety were similar to population norms for ~85% of women. Decisional conflict and regret were generally low; however, decisional uncertainty and regret were greater in pregnant than nonpregnant women, and not-tested than tested women (uncertainty: χ2=18.51, P<0.001 and χ2=43.11, P<0.001, respectively; regret: χ2=6.61, P<0.037 and χ2=35.54, P<0.001, respectively).ConclusionWe provide evidence to inform guidelines that population FXS carrier screening can be implemented with minimal psychosocial harms following appropriate information and prescreening genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Ames
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicki Anderson
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rob Carter
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Fragile X Alliance Clinic and Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Cotter
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M GenCouns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Dang
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Donath
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samantha Edwards
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Educ
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Robin Forbes
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Mioara Gavrila
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - M MedSci
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Lorilli Jacobs
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Ultrasound
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Vicki Petrou
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Loren Plunkett
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M GenCouns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leslie Sheffield
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,MyDNA Life Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Racp
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,MyDNA Life Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Thornton
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sandra Younie
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Hlth Econ
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia.,Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doernberg S, Hull SC. Harms of Deception in FMR1 Premutation Genotype-Driven Recruitment. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2017; 17:62-63. [PMID: 28328354 PMCID: PMC6097709 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1284920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Chandros Hull
- b National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Molster CM, Lister K, Metternick-Jones S, Baynam G, Clarke AJ, Straub V, Dawkins HJS, Laing N. Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments. Front Public Health 2017; 5:25. [PMID: 28286745 PMCID: PMC5323409 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Consideration of expanded carrier screening has become an emerging issue for governments. However, traditional criteria for decision-making regarding screening programs do not incorporate all the issues relevant to expanded carrier screening. Further, there is a lack of consistent guidance in the literature regarding the development of appropriate criteria for government assessment of expanded carrier screening. Given this, a workshop was held to identify key public policy issues related to preconception expanded carrier screening, which governments should consider when deciding whether to publicly fund such programs. Methods In June 2015, a satellite workshop was held at the European Society of Human Genetics Conference. It was structured around two design features: (1) the provision of information from a range of perspectives and (2) small group deliberations on the key issues that governments need to consider and the benefits, risks, and challenges of implementing publicly funded whole-population preconception carrier screening. Results Forty-one international experts attended the workshop. The deliberations centered primarily on the conditions to be tested and the elements of the screening program itself. Participants expected only severe conditions to be screened but were concerned about the lack of a consensus definition of “severe.” Issues raised regarding the screening program included the purpose, benefits, harms, target population, program acceptability, components of a program, and economic evaluation. Participants also made arguments for consideration of the accuracy of screening tests. Conclusion A wide range of issues require careful consideration by governments that want to assess expanded carrier screening. Traditional criteria for government decision-making regarding screening programs are not a “best fit” for expanded carrier screening and new models of decision-making with appropriate criteria are required. There is a need to define what a “severe” condition is, to build evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of screening tests, to consider the equitable availability and downstream effects on and costs of follow-up interventions for those identified as carriers, and to explore the ways in which the components of a screening program would be impacted by unique features of expanded carrier screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caron M Molster
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia , Perth, WA , Australia
| | - Karla Lister
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia , Perth, WA , Australia
| | | | - Gareth Baynam
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Genetic Services WA, Perth, WA, Australia; School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, Perth, WA, Australia; Spatial Sciences, Department of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Angus John Clarke
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| | - Volker Straub
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Hugh J S Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Centre for Comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia; Centre for Population Health Research, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Nigel Laing
- Centre for Medical Research, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Diagnostic Genomics, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Beard CA, Amor DJ, Di Pietro L, Archibald AD. "I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170:2052-9. [PMID: 27150953 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Advancing genetic testing technologies mean that population-based carrier screening for multiple inherited conditions is now available. As the number of genetic conditions being screened increases, there is a need for research into how people experience these screening programs. This research aimed to explore how women experience simultaneous carrier screening for three inherited conditions: cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and fragile X syndrome (FXS). A qualitative approach was adopted using in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of ten female participants: five SMA carriers, three CF carriers, and two FXS premutation carriers. Eight participants were pregnant when offered screening by their general practitioner or obstetrician and the decision to have screening was described as straightforward. Participants reported experiencing emotional responses such as anxiety and stress while waiting for either their partner's carrier screen result (CF or SMA carriers) or the pregnancy's CVS result (FXS carrier) and sought additional information about the relevant condition during this time. Most participants were in favor of population carrier screening for these conditions, preferably prior to conception. Genetic counselors played an essential role in supporting couples after they received a carrier result given the variable consent processes undertaken when screening was offered. Further research should focus on the development of reliable online information tailored to people receiving carrier results and strategies for raising awareness of the availability of population carrier screening within the community. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A Beard
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louisa Di Pietro
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Genetic Support Network of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Archibald AD, Hickerton CL, Wake SA, Jaques AM, Cohen J, Metcalfe SA. "It gives them more options": preferences for preconception genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in primary healthcare. J Community Genet 2016; 7:159-71. [PMID: 26842720 PMCID: PMC4796042 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0262-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to explore stakeholder views about offering population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. A qualitative study using interviews and focus groups with stakeholders was undertaken to allow for an in-depth exploration of views and perceptions about practicalities of, and strategies for, offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to the general population in healthcare settings. A total of 188 stakeholders took part including healthcare providers (n = 81), relatives of people with fragile X syndrome (n = 29), and members of the general community (n = 78). The importance of raising community awareness about screening and providing appropriate support for carriers was emphasized. There was a preference for preconception carrier screening and for providing people with the opportunity to make an informed decision about screening. Primary care was highlighted as a setting which would ensure screening is accessible; however, challenges of offering screening in primary care were identified including time to discuss screening, knowledge about the test and possible outcomes, and the health professionals' approach to offering screening. With the increasing availability of genetic carrier tests, it is essential that research now focuses on evaluating approaches for the delivery of carrier screening programs. Primary healthcare is perceived as an appropriate setting through which to access the target population, and raising awareness is essential to making genetic screening more accessible to the general community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison D Archibald
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Samantha A Wake
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alice M Jaques
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Fragile X Alliance Inc., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Family Communication and Cascade Testing for Fragile X Syndrome. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:1075-84. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9940-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
17
|
Cotter M, Archibald AD, McClaren BJ, Burgess T, Francis D, Hills L, Martyn M, Oertel R, Slater H, Cohen J, Metcalfe SA. Clinical audit of genetic testing and referral patterns for fragile X and associated conditions. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170:1439-49. [DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Cotter
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
- Clinical Genetics; Austin Health; Heidelberg VIC Australia
| | - Alison D. Archibald
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Belinda J. McClaren
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Trent Burgess
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - David Francis
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Louise Hills
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Ralph Oertel
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Howard Slater
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
- Fragile X Alliance Inc, North Caulfield, VIC and Center for Developmental Disability Health Victoria; Monash University; Clayton VIC Australia
| | - Sylvia A. Metcalfe
- Genetics Education and Health Research; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital; Parkville VIC Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; The University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
"Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:135-45. [PMID: 26093606 PMCID: PMC4726717 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9851-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
As genome sequencing technology advances, research is needed to guide decision-making about what results can or should be offered to patients in different clinical settings. We conducted three focus groups with individuals who had prior preconception genetic testing experience to explore perceived advantages and disadvantages of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening, compared to usual care. Using a discussion guide, a trained qualitative moderator facilitated the audio-recorded focus groups. Sixteen individuals participated. Thematic analysis of transcripts started with a grounded approach and subsequently focused on participants’ perceptions of the value of genetic information. Analysis uncovered two orientations toward genomic preconception carrier screening: “certain” individuals desiring all possible screening information; and “hesitant” individuals who were more cautious about its value. Participants revealed valuable information about barriers to screening: fear/anxiety about results; concerns about the method of returning results; concerns about screening necessity; and concerns about partner participation. All participants recommended offering choice to patients to enhance the value of screening and reduce barriers. Overall, two groups of likely users of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening demonstrated different perceptions of the advantages or disadvantages of screening, suggesting tailored approaches to education, consent, and counseling may be warranted with each group.
Collapse
|
19
|
Simplified strategy for rapid first-line screening of fragile X syndrome: closed-tube triplet-primed PCR and amplicon melt peak analysis. Expert Rev Mol Med 2015; 17:e7. [PMID: 25936533 PMCID: PMC4836207 DOI: 10.1017/erm.2015.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Premutation and full-mutation hyperexpansion of CGG-triplets in the X-linked Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene have been implicated in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency, and fragile X syndrome (FXS), respectively. The currently available molecular diagnostic tests are either costly or labour-intensive, which prohibits their application as a first-line FMR1 test in large-scale population-based screening programs. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of a simplified closed-tube strategy for rapid first-line screening of FXS based on melt peak temperature (Tm) analysis of direct triplet-primed polymerase chain reaction amplicons (dTP-PCR MCA). In addition, we also evaluated the correlation between Tm and CGG-repeat size based on capillary electrophoresis (CE) of dTP-PCR amplicons. The assays were initially tested on 29 FMR1 reference DNA samples, followed by a blinded validation on 107 previously characterised patient DNA samples. The dTP-PCR MCA produced distinct melt profiles of higher Tm for samples carrying an expanded allele. Among the samples tested, we also observed a good correlation between Tm and CGG-repeat size. In the blinded validation study, dTP-PCR MCA accurately classified all normal and expansion carriers, and the FMR1 genotypic classification of all samples was completely concordant with the previously determined genotypes as well as the dTP-PCR CE results. This simple and cost-effective MCA-based assay may be useful as a first-line FXS screening tool that could rapidly screen out the large majority of unaffected individuals, thus minimising the number of samples that need to be analysed by Southern blot analysis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sandford E, Burmeister M. Genes and genetic testing in hereditary ataxias. Genes (Basel) 2014; 5:586-603. [PMID: 25055202 PMCID: PMC4198919 DOI: 10.3390/genes5030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Revised: 06/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Ataxia is a neurological cerebellar disorder characterized by loss of coordination during muscle movements affecting walking, vision, and speech. Genetic ataxias are very heterogeneous, with causative variants reported in over 50 genes, which can be inherited in classical dominant, recessive, X-linked, or mitochondrial fashion. A common mechanism of dominant ataxias is repeat expansions, where increasing lengths of repeated DNA sequences result in non-functional proteins that accumulate in the body causing disease. Greater understanding of all ataxia genes has helped identify several different pathways, such as DNA repair, ubiquitination, and ion transport, which can be used to help further identify new genes and potential treatments. Testing for the most common mutations in these genes is now clinically routine to help with prognosis and treatment decisions, but next generation sequencing will revolutionize how genetic testing will be done. Despite the large number of known ataxia causing genes, however, many individuals with ataxia are unable to obtain a genetic diagnosis, suggesting that more genes need to be discovered. Utilization of next generation sequencing technologies, expression studies, and increased knowledge of ataxia pathways will aid in the identification of new ataxia genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Sandford
- Molecular & Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Margit Burmeister
- Molecular & Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Warsch JRL, Warsch S, Herman E, Zakarin L, Schneider A, Hoffman J, Wasserman D, Barbouth D. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to carrier screening for the Ashkenazi Jewish panel: a Florida experience : Education and Barriers assessment for Jewish Genetic Diseases. J Community Genet 2014; 5:223-31. [PMID: 24415495 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0179-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to Jewish genetic diseases (JGDs) and screening and their relative importance in reproductive decision-making were assessed in a population-based sample of Ashkenazi Jewish young adults in Florida. These adults attended educational screening fairs hosted by The Victor Center for the Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases at the University of Miami. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate to analyze data from a single group pretest/posttest design. Four hundred twelve individuals (mean age = 24.9; 54.7 % female, 45.3 % male) completed the questionnaires. Participants' level of knowledge increased from pre- to post-intervention (81.4 vs. 91.0 %; p < 0.0001). Concern about the possibility of being a carrier of a JGD was significantly higher after an educational session (5-point Likert scale mean difference = 0.45; p < 0.0001), as was their level of concern regarding having an affected child (mean difference = 0.20; p < 0.0001). The number of participants who agreed or strongly agreed that the test results would not have any influence on their reproductive behavior was lower after the session (17.2 vs. 20.8 %; p < 0.0001). This study demonstrates that an educational carrier screening program increased knowledge and elucidated awareness of the attitudes and barriers toward JGDs and carrier screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R L Warsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
De Geyter C, M'Rabet N, De Geyter J, Zürcher S, Moffat R, Bösch N, Zhang H, Heinimann K. Similar prevalence of expanded CGG repeat lengths in the fragile X mental retardation I gene among infertile women and among women with proven fertility: a prospective study. Genet Med 2013; 16:374-8. [PMID: 24113347 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to determine the usefulness of fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) carrier testing among young infertile women with or without signs of ovarian insufficiency as compared with fertile women. METHODS Three cohorts of women were recruited to determine the cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeats trinucleotide repeat length in the 5'-untranslated region of the FMR1 gene in lymphocyte DNA. A total of 199 fertile women, who were reported to have conceived within 3 months, were recruited together with 372 infertile women with ongoing menstrual cycles and 48 infertile women with primary ovarian insufficiency. The various ranges of FMR1 CGG repeat lengths among infertile women were compared with those of fertile controls. In infertile women with ongoing menstrual cycles, the serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone, anti-Muellerian hormone, and inhibin B were measured during the early follicular phase. RESULTS None of the three categories of FMR1 CGG repeat length expansions (premutation, intermediate range, and high normal range) were more prevalent among infertile women than among fertile women. The CGG repeat length was not correlated with any of the ovarian reserve parameters. CONCLUSION In comparison with a generalized preconception screening strategy, infertility as a criterion, even together with reduced ovarian reserve, is not suitable for identifying a higher proportion of women with expanded FMR1 CGG repeat length.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian De Geyter
- 1] Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland [2] Clinic of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nadira M'Rabet
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julie De Geyter
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Zürcher
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Human Genetics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Moffat
- Clinic of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nemya Bösch
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Human Genetics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karl Heinimann
- Department of Biomedicine, Research Group on Human Genetics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Martyn M, Anderson V, Archibald A, Carter R, Cohen J, Delatycki M, Donath S, Emery J, Halliday J, Hill M, Sheffield L, Slater H, Tassone F, Younie S, Metcalfe S. Offering fragile X syndrome carrier screening: a prospective mixed-methods observational study comparing carrier screening of pregnant and non-pregnant women in the general population. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003660. [PMID: 24022395 PMCID: PMC3773647 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2013] [Revised: 07/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading cause of inherited intellectual and developmental disability. Policy development relating to carrier screening programmes for FXS requires input from large studies examining not only test uptake but also psychosocial aspects. This study will compare carrier screening in pregnant and non-pregnant populations, examining informed decision-making, psychosocial issues and health economics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Pregnant and non-pregnant women are being recruited from general practices and obstetric services. Women receive study information either in person or through clinic mail outs. Women are provided pretest counselling by a genetic counsellor and make a decision about testing in their own time. Data are being collected from two questionnaires: one completed at the time of making the decision about testing and the second 1 month later. Additional data are gathered through qualitative interviews conducted at several time points with a subset of participating women, including all women with a positive test result, and with staff from recruiting clinics. A minimum sample size of 500 women/group has been calculated to give us 88% power to detect a 10% difference in test uptake and 87% power to detect a 10% difference in informed choice between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups. Questionnaire data will be analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models. Interview data will be thematically analysed. Willingness-to-pay and cost effectiveness analyses will also be performed. Recruitment started in July 2009 and data collection will be completed by December 2013. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been granted by the Universities of Melbourne and Western Australia and by recruiting clinics, where required. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and through a website http://www.fragilexscreening.net.au. The results of this study will make a significant contribution to discussions about the wider introduction of population carrier screening for FXS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Martyn
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Christensen KD, Green RC. How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior? Per Med 2013; 10:10.2217/pme.13.24. [PMID: 24319470 PMCID: PMC3852635 DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we argue that disclosure of incidental findings from whole-genome sequencing has the potential to motivate individuals to change health behaviors through psychological mechanisms that differ from typical risk assessment interventions. Their ability to do so, however, is likely to be highly contingent upon the nature of the incidental findings and how they are disclosed, the context of the disclosure and the characteristics of the patient. Moreover, clinicians need to be aware that behavioral responses may occur in unanticipated ways. This article argues for commentators and policy makers to take a cautious but optimistic perspective while empirical evidence is collected through ongoing research involving whole-genome sequencing and the disclosure of incidental information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt D Christensen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, EC Alumnae Hall, Suite 301, 41 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115-5727, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, EC Alumnae Hall, Suite 301, 41 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115-5727, USA
- Partners Healthcare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|