Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a relatively rare malignant tumour with a poor prognosis. This study was designed to identify prognostic factors and establish a nomogram model to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with SNMM.

METHODS

A total of 459 patients with SNMM were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as the training cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for independent factors associated with patient prognosis and develop the nomogram model. In addition, external validation was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the nomogram with a cohort of 34 patients with SNMM from Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

RESULTS

The median OS in the cohort from the SEER database was 28 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 69.8%, 40.4%, and 30.0%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age, T stage, N stage, surgery and radiotherapy were independent variables associated with OS. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the nomograms for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 0.78, 0.71 and 0.71, respectively, in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 0.90, 0.75 and 0.78, respectively. Patients were classified into low- and high-risk groups based on the total score of the nomogram. Patients in the low-risk group had a significantly better survival prognosis than patients in the high-risk group in both the training cohort (P < 0.0001) and the validation cohort (P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSION

We established and validated a novel nomogram model to predict the OS of SNMM patients stratified by age, T stage, N stage, surgery and radiotherapy. This predictive tool is of potential importance in the realms of patient counselling and clinical decision-making.

Recurrence patterns among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A multi-institutional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate recurrence patterns and survival after recurrence among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM).

METHODS

This was a multi-institutional retrospective review from seven U.S. institutions of patients with SNMM from 1991 to 2022. Recurrence was categorized as local, regional, distant, or multifocal. Kaplan-Meier tests were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and post-recurrence survival (PRS) reported with standard errors (SE) and log-rank testing used for comparison. Cox-regression was further used, with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported.

RESULTS

Among 196 patients with SNMM, there were 146 patients with recurrence (74.5%). Among all patients, 60-month DFS (SE) was 15.5% (2.9%), 60-month OS (SE) was 44.7% (3.7%), mean age ± standard deviation at diagnosis was 69.7 ± 12.5 years, and 54.6% were female. In 26 patients who underwent primary treatment of the neck, 60-month DFS did not differ from no treatment (p > 0.05). Isolated distant recurrence was most common (42.8%), followed by local (28.3%), multifocal (20.7%), and regional recurrence (8.3%). Among patients with regional recurrence in the neck, there was no 60-month PRS benefit for patients undergoing salvage neck dissection or radiation (p > 0.05). Among patients with distant recurrence, only immunotherapy was associated with improved 12-month PRS (HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.11-0.92, p = 0.034), and no treatment group was associated with improved 24- or 60-month PRS (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SNMM is associated with a high recurrence rate and poor survival. Primary treatment of the neck was not associated with reduced recurrence, and immunotherapy for treatment of distant recurrence was associated with increased 12-month PRS.

A nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with sinonasal melanoma: A population-based study

Objective

Sinonasal melanoma (SMM) is a rare but aggressive malignancy with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates below 40% in published studies. However, the clinicopathological predictors of the prognosis of SMM remain undefined. We aimed to establish a model to predict the survival outcomes of SMM.

Methods

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with SMM between 1975 and 2016. Data on patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were retrieved. Risk factors for OS were evaluated by survival and Cox regression analyses. We also developed and validated a nomogram for OS, and compared its performance with that of conventional staging systems.

Results

Overall, 305 SMM patients were included in this population-based study. Multivariate Cox regression showed that primary site, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, radiotherapy, and surgery were significant risk factors for survival. A nomogram was established using the regression model. The C-indices, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis demonstrated reliable performance of the nomogram.

Conclusion

The nomogram predicting survival outcomes of SMM patients based on clinical information showed good discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy compared with conventional stage classifications. Our nomogram could be used to predict the survival probabilities for SMM patients at different timepoints.

Level of Evidence

2b.

International Multicenter Study of Clinical Outcomes of Sinonasal Melanoma Shows Survival Benefit for Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Potential Improvements to the Current TNM Staging System

Objectives Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an extremely rare and challenging sinonasal malignancy with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment involves complete surgical resection, but the role of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Crucially, our understanding of its clinical presentation, course, and optimal treatment remains limited, and few advancements in improving its management have been made in the recent past.

Methods We conducted an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 505 SNMM cases from 11 institutions across the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, and continental Europe. Data on clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results One-, three-, and five-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 61.4, 30.6, and 22.0%, and 77.6, 49.2, and 38.3%, respectively. Compared with disease confined to the nasal cavity, sinus involvement confers significantly worse survival; based on this, further stratifying the T3 stage was highly prognostic (p < 0.001) with implications for a potential modification to the current TNM staging system. There was a statistically significant survival benefit for patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, compared with those who underwent surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–0.96, p = 0.021). Immune checkpoint blockade for the management of recurrent or persistent disease, with or without distant metastasis, conferred longer survival (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25–1.00, p = 0.036).

Conclusions We present findings from the largest cohort of SNMM reported to date. We demonstrate the potential utility of further stratifying the T3 stage by sinus involvement and present promising data on the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent, persistent, or metastatic disease with implications for future clinical trials in this field.

Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: An Update and Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT

Primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an aggressive tumor with high metastatic potential and poor outcomes. Presenting symptoms are nonspecific, and the nasal cavity is the most common site of origin followed by the maxillary and ethmoid sinuses. Histopathologically, SNMMs are pleomorphic and predominantly composed of epithelioid cell type. Identifying these tumors requires a high index of suspicion for melanoma and the use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers when typical histopathological features are missing. Not infrequently, these tumors are undifferentiated and/or amelanotic. Currently, SNMM falls into 2 different staging systems proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, one for carcinoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses and the other for head and neck melanoma. Although therapeutic standards do not exist, surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy may offer the best outcome. Lymphadenectomy including possible parotidectomy and neck dissection should be considered in patients with regional lymph node metastasis. However, the role of elective lymph node dissection is controversial. Genetic profiling has identified a number of recurrent gene mutations that may prove useful in providing targets for novel, emerging biological treatments. In this article, we provide an update on clinicopathological features, staging, molecular discoveries, and treatment options for SNMM.

A nomogram for predicting survival of head and neck mucosal melanoma

Objectives

We aimed to understand the clinical characteristics and better predict the prognosis of patients with mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) using a nomogram.

Methods

Three hundred patients with nometastatic MMHN were included. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to analyze independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and these factors were used to develop a nomogram. Concordance indexes (C-indexes), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to test the predictive performance of the nomogram in both the primary (n = 300) and validation cohorts (n = 182).

Results

The primary tumor site, T stage and N stage were independent risk factors for survival and were included in the nomogram to predict the 3- and 5-year OS, DFS, DMFS, and LRRFS in the primary cohort. The C-indexes (both > 0.700), well-fit calibration plots, and area under the ROC curve (both > 0.700) indicated the high diagnostic accuracy of the nomogram, in both the primary and validation cohorts. The patients were divided into three groups (high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups) according to their nomogram scores. The survival curves of OS, DFS, DMFS, and LRRFS were well separated by the risk groups in both cohorts (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The nomogram can stratify MMHN patients into clinically meaningful taxonomies to provide individualized treatment.

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma: a 10-year experience of 36 cases in China

Background

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the clinical and imaging features, progression, treatment, and possible prognostic factors of SNMM.

Methods

Thirty-six patients with SNMM were retrospectively reviewed in the Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery of Xinhua Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017.

Results

The age of the first diagnosis was 67.4±10.8 years; the most common clinical symptoms included epistaxis, nasal obstruction, headache, and facial pain. Most tumors originated in the nasal cavity (63.9%) and at stage IV (77.8%). Melanin in melanoma showed typical signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), T1WI had high signal while T2WI had low signal. 41.6% of patients had the typical MRI findings. Treatment included surgery, surgery with radiotherapy, and radiotherapy only. The follow-up time ranged from 4 to 96 months, with a median time of 22 months, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS is 80.6%, 36.1%, and 13.9%, respectively. The 3-year OS was better in cases in the T3 stage than the T4 stage (P=0.02). However, tumors that originated from the paranasal sinus had a poorer prognosis than the nasal cavity (P=0.04). The cases receiving postoperative radiotherapy showed poorer prognosis (P=0.02). Other factors were not found to be associated with prognosis, including gender, age, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, computed tomography (CT) enhancement, and typical MRI findings.

Conclusions

The SNMM was a devastating tumor with poor outcomes; most cases were diagnosed at late stages, which may account for poor prognosis. Tumors with melanin feature MRI findings do not have a better prognosis. The treatment of postoperative radiotherapy is still controversial.

Prognosis of endoscopic surgery and traditional open resection in mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus

Mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus is always associated with poor prognosis, and 5-year overall survival does not exceed 40%. Our study aimed to compare the intraoperative conditions and prognosis of different surgical techniques to determine the optimum surgical approach for patients with mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. This was a retrospective analysis of 54 patients who received treatment at Beijing Tongren Hospital between January 2004 and December 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received endoscopic surgery and those who underwent traditional open resection. The study analyzed the operative methods, the intraoperative conditions, and the prognosis of the patients. SAS JMP Pro software was used for statistical analysis of the data. There were 27 patients in the endoscopic surgery group and 27 patients in the open surgery group. Each group had the same distribution in terms of AJCC staging, with seven stage III, 12 stage IVA, and eight stage IVB patients in each group. There were statistically significant differences in operative time, complications, and cosmetic effects between the two groups, but no difference in local recurrence, disease-free survival, or overall survival. In the endoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, local recurrence rates were 14.81 and 11.11%, respectively, and metastasis rates were the same in both groups (40.74%). With regard to long-term prognosis, there was no statistically significant difference between the different surgical techniques, especially in terms of survival benefit. We believe that endoscopic surgery with protection of local function can be recommended for mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus on the basis of its advantages in terms of shorter duration of surgery and fewer complications. In addition, it achieves better postoperative cosmetic effects with minimal scarring on the face of the patient, and thus improves postoperative quality of life.

An updated review of mucosal melanoma: Survival meta-analysis

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a highly lethal variant of melanoma that carries a poor prognosis. Extremely low incidence and survival rates have led to few clinical trials, and a lack of protocols and guidelines. The present study performed a survival meta-analysis for the quantitative synthesis of available evidence to search for key patterns that would help clinicians tailor optimal therapeutic strategies in MM. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and other databases were searched. Hazard ratios, in disease-specific and overall survival, were calculated for each of the survival-determining variables. MM was 2.25 times more lethal than cutaneous melanoma (CM). The most significant threats to survival were advanced Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage, sino-nasal location, and old age. Chemotherapy was the most effective form of adjuvant therapy. Disease-specific survival, the primary measure of the effect sizes, can fluctuate depending on the accuracy of the reported cause of mortality. In conclusion, MM is a peculiar type of melanoma, with clinical and molecular profile vastly different from the much-familiar CM. In the wake of the era of precision oncology, further studies on driver mutations and oncogenic pathways would likely lead to improved patient survival.

Nodal and distant metastases in sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare malignant neoplasm. No study to date has analyzed the impact that nodal metastases and distant metastases at diagnosis have on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for cases of SNMM. Descriptive statistics were used analyze patient demographic and clinicopathologic variables. The Kaplan-Meier model was used to analyze survival, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-eight cases of SNMM were identified. The most frequent sinonasal anatomic location was the nasal cavity in 279 (73.0%) patients, followed by the maxillary sinus in 60 (15.7%) patients. Regional nodal metastases at diagnosis occurred in 33 (8.6%) patients, whereas distant metastases at diagnosis occurred in 41 (10.7%) patients. Five-year OS was 22.7%, and 5-year DSS was 26.8%. The presence of positive nodes at diagnosis (OS P < .0001, DSS P < .0001), distant metastases at diagnosis (OS P = .0442, DSS P = .0442), primary tumor site (OS P < .0001, DSS P < .0001), and increasing age (OS P = .0012, DSS P = .0016) were found to be significant as negative predictors of OS and DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

SNMM is a rare pathologic entity with a poor prognosis. The presence of nodal and distant metastases at diagnosis are negative prognostic factors in OS and DSS. These factors can be used in the development of new models of risk stratification and to inform treatment strategies and surveillance patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:622-627, 2020.

Common Pitfalls of Head and Neck Research Using Cancer Registries

OBJECTIVE

To highlight common pitfalls observed in scientific research derived from national cancer registries, predominantly the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and the National Cancer Database.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review and expert opinion.

REVIEW METHODS

This state-of-the-art review consolidates the literature with editorial experiences describing how and why statistically flawed studies are usually rejected for publication, highlighting common errors in submitted articles employing national cancer registries.

CONCLUSIONS

Pitfalls were identified in 2 major areas-design and data analysis. Design pitfalls included unbalanced cohorts, uncontrolled covariates, and flawed oncologic variables. Analytical pitfalls included incorrect application of univariate analyses, inclusion of inaccurate data, and inclusion of stage IVc disease in curative survival analysis. Additional limitations of database studies were identified, including absence of patient-related outcomes, hypothesis-generating vs practice-changing implications, and inability to differentiate between overall survival and disease-specific survival.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Methodological strategies are suggested to ensure careful analytical design and appropriate interpretation. Although national cancer registries provide a wealth of data, researchers must remain vigilant when designing studies and analyzing these data sets. Inherent design flaws raise considerable problems with interpretation; however, when analyzed judiciously, registries can lead to a better understanding of cancer outcomes.

Incidence and survival in sinonasal carcinoma: a Danish population-based, nationwide study from 1980 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal cancers are rare and comprise <1% of all malignancies. This study describes incidence and survival in sinonasal carcinomas in Denmark from 1980 to 2014.

METHODS

All patients registered in the Danish Cancer Registry in the period were included. Age-adjusted incidence rate, average annual percentage change, and relative survival were calculated. Age-period-cohort models were constructed.

RESULTS

1,720 patients with sinonasal carcinoma (median age 67 years, 63% males) were identified. There was no significant change in age-adjusted incidence; 0.70 in 1980 to 0.43 per 100,000 in 2014 (p > .05). Relative 5- and 10-year survival were 52% and 40% for men, 58% and 42% for women. An increase in 5-year survival from 1980 to 2014 from 46% to 65% (p < .05) was found. Nasal carcinomas had a significantly better relative survival compared to sinus carcinoma, as did squamous cell carcinomas when compared to neuroendocrine malignancies.

CONCLUSION

In Denmark between 1980 and 2014, the incidence of sinonasal carcinomas has been stable and the relative survival has increased significantly.

Patterns of Treatment Failure in Patients with Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Head and neck mucosal melanoma is a locally aggressive tumor with a high recurrence rate. The paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity are the most common primary tumor sites.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify independent predictors of outcome in sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) and characterize the patterns of treatment failure.

METHODS

This study included 198 patients with SNMM who had been treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1 January 1991 through 31 December 2016. The survival outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. A stepwise regression analysis was used to assess associations in the multivariate models.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS, DSS, and DFS rates were 38, 58, and 27%, respectively. Independent predictors of poor OS and DSS were the paranasal sinuses as the primary tumor site [hazard ratio (HR) 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.66; and HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.21-3.74, respectively] and the presence of distant metastases at presentation (HR 4.53, 95% CI 2.24-7.83; and HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.12-7.1). Recurrence occurred in 96 patients (48%). The most common cause of treatment failure was distant metastasis in 69 of 198 patients (35%), followed by local [36 (18%)] and regional [22 (11%)] recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The most common cause of treatment failure in SNMM is distant metastasis. The tumor site and the presence of metastatic disease at presentation were the only independent predictors of survival. These data can be used to inform quality improvement efforts and the counseling of high-risk SNMM patients.

Endoscopic resection of sinonasal mucosal melanoma has comparable outcomes to open approaches

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal resection (EER) of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SMM) is a newer surgical alternative to traditional external and/or open resection (OR). Studies on long-term outcomes are necessary to validate EER for this aggressive sinonasal malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of EER versus OR in SMM.

METHODS

A case series of patients who underwent surgical resection of SMM at a tertiary-care institution (2000-2015) was studied retrospectively. Demographics, tumor site and stage, surgical approach, surgical margin status, local control, and survival were compared between those who underwent EER and OR.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Nine underwent EER and 13 underwent OR. The mean age in the EER and OR groups was similar, 78.7 and 72.3 years, respectively. Two-thirds of patients were women (EER, 66.7%; OR, 61.5%). The nasal cavity was the most common primary tumor site (EER, 77.8%; OR, 84.6%). The local tumor stage in both groups was similar, with the majority of cases being T4 (EER, 55.6%; OR, 61.5%; p = 0.99). Negative margins were achieved in all EERs and in 69.2% of ORs. Median follow-up was 25.0 months for the overall group (range, 1.7-172.9 months), 32.6 months (range, 3.4-58.7 months) for EER and 14.1 months (range, 1.7-172.9 months) for OR cohorts. The 5-year overall survival was statistically similar in both groups (EER, 53.3%; OR, 22.7%; p = 0.214) as was disease-free survival (EER, 55.6%; OR, 22.8%; p = 0.178). Local control, however, was significantly higher in the EER cohort (EER, 85.7%; OR, 37.6%; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected patients with sinonasal melanoma, endoscopic surgery with an experienced team may offer comparable survival and improved local control over open surgery. Prospective, multicentered studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.

Recurrence in a patient with a 10-year history of sinonasal mucosal melanoma manifesting as facial swelling

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare tumor that develops slowly and may manifest with non specific signs and symptoms, causing significant delay in diagnosis. Local recurrence is common and usually occurs within the first two years after the initial treatment. Prognosis of recurrent lesions is poor and 5-year survival ranges between 10-47%. We report the clinical, radiographic, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of a recurrent sinonasal mucosal melanoma which was diagnosed 10 years after the initial treatment, in a patient who presented with unilateral facial swelling and one-sided difficulty in breathing of two years duration. We discuss the causes of late diagnosis and review the negative predictive factors for recurrence and survival. As early diagnosis is of paramount importance for prognosis, we emphasize the signs and symptoms of patients with a history of sinonasal mucosal melanoma which should raise the suspicion for recurrence, in spite of a long time interval since diagnosis. Key words: Mucosal melanoma, nasal cavity, sinus, recurrence.

Adjuvant radiation and survival following surgical resection of sinonasal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for sinonasal melanoma, but it is often difficult to obtain clear, negative margins. Therefore, patients often receive adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), however its impact on overall survival (OS) is not well understood.

METHODS

Patients with surgically resected sinonasal melanoma were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB, n=696). Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric survival regression were used to analyze the impact of adjuvant RT on OS from surgery. Adjusted time ratios (aTRs) were computed, with values >1 corresponding to improved survival.

RESULTS

399 (57.3%) patients received adjuvant RT. Those receiving RT tended to be younger but with more advanced disease and greater likelihood of positive margins, compared to those receiving no adjuvant therapy. Median survival was 25.0months for those treated with surgery alone, compared to 28.3months for those receiving adjuvant RT (log-rank P=0.408). When adjusting for potential confounders, there was a trend towards greater survival with adjuvant RT (aTR 1.16, 95%CI 0.98-1.37). RT appeared beneficial in those with stage IVB disease (aTR 2.58, 95%CI 1.40-4.75) but not stage IVA (aTR 1.19, 95%CI 0.88-1.61) or III (aTR 0.85, 95%CI 0.65-1.13) disease. In contrast, there were no differences in impact of RT according to margin status (aTR 1.16 for both positive and negative margins).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy does not appear to provide a significant survival benefit in resected sinonasal melanomas regardless of margin status, except those with stage IVB disease. Practitioners should carefully consider the added benefit of adjuvant therapy in these patients.

Failure patterns and prognostic factors of patients with primary mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the failure patterns and prognostic factors influencing survival in patients with primary mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients were analysed retrospectively. Forty-eight, 33, 10, and 13 patients underwent surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, respectively. Failure events, including local recurrence, regional relapse, distant metastases, and death, were examined.

RESULTS

During follow-up (median: 59.0 months), 36 patients experienced failure after treatment, including local (n = 17), regional (n = 8), and distant organ (n = 23) metastases. The median failure times for local, regional, and distant metastases were 13.0, 14.0, and 8.0 months, respectively. The median survival times from local, regional, and distant failure to death were 10.5, 8.0, and 4.0 months, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with and without distant organ metastases were 14.4% and 72.6%, respectively (p < .001). Multivariate analyses showed that radiotherapy increased local recurrence-free and regional relapse-free survival. Patients with stage IV tumours had reduced distant metastasis-free and overall survival compared to patients with stage I-III tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Distant metastasis was mainly owing to failure. Radiotherapy and the disease stage were prognostic factors for survival.

Treatment and outcomes of endoscopic surgery and traditional open resection in sinonasal mucosal melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The optimal surgical approach for sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNM) remains under debate. We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of traditional open resection and endoscopic surgery for patients with SNM treated at a single center.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients diagnosed with SNM who underwent surgery between January 1995 and June 2014 at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed; 18 patients were treated using an open resection approach and 15 using an endoscopic resection approach for the primary tumor. The associations between open resection and endoscopic resection with treatment-related survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The most common presenting symptoms were epistaxis and abstraction; the nasal cavity was the most common anatomic location. The open resection and endoscopic resection groups did not have significantly different demographic or tumor characteristics. Overall survival (p = .66) and disease-free survival (p = .73) were modest and did not differ significantly between the open resection and endoscopic resection groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study indicates that the endoscopic endonasal approach is an effective treatment for SNM in selected cases and, when performed by a skilled surgeon, can enable successful radical resection with a similar efficacy as traditional open resection.

Factors Associated With Survival in Patients With Synovial Cell Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: An Analysis of 167 Cases Using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Database

IMPORTANCE

Synovial cell sarcoma of the head and neck (SCSHN) is a rare tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The literature regarding these tumors is limited to case series and case reports. We used data from the population-based US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry to determine factors affecting both overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients with SCSHN.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinicopathologic and therapeutic factors determining survival in patients with SCSHN.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The SEER registry was reviewed for patients with primary SCSHN from January 1, 1973, to January 1, 2011.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 167 cases of SCSHN were identified. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 37.9 (17.3) years, and 100 (59.9%) of the patients were males. The monophasic spindle cell and biphasic variants were the most common histologic subtypes. Surgical resection and radiotherapy were performed in 150 (89.8%) and 108 (64.7%) of the cases, respectively. The median OS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 77%, 66%, and 53%, respectively. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that age, race, and tumor stage and size were associated with improved survival. Histologic subtype was not associated with significant differences in survival. Radiotherapy was associated with improved disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12-0.68]; P = .003), but surgical management was not associated with improved survival (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.19-1.46]; P = .21). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that size greater than 5 cm (adjusted HR, 3.60 [95% CI, 1.43-9.08]; P = .007) and stage at presentation (adjusted HR, 3.86 [95% CI, 2.01-7.44]; P < .001) were independent determinants of OS. In separate analysis of cohorts with tumors 5 cm or less and larger than 5 cm, stage at presentation was found to be a significant indicator of the probability of survival in both cohorts (adjusted HR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.46-6.60]; P = .003 and 5.32 [95% CI, 1.49-18.98]; P = .01, respectively); surgical resection and radiotherapy were not associated with differential survival outcomes using this model.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Synovial cell sarcoma of the head and neck is rare. Independent significant determinants of survival include size (>5 cm) and stage at presentation. Histologic subtype of the tumor is not a significant indicator of the probability of survival. Surgical resection and radiotherapy were not independent determinants of survival.

Imaging of Paranasal Sinuses and Anterior Skull Base and Relevant Anatomic Variations

This article reviews the normal anatomy and variants of the anterior skull base and sinonasal cavities that are relevant to endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery. Radiologists should be aware of sinonasal anatomy that can be impediments to surgical access and increase risk of vascular or cranial nerve injury during surgery. Imaging features of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base pathologies are also discussed.

The presentation and outcomes of mucosal melanoma in 695 patients

BACKGROUND

Most data on sinonasal mucosal melanoma come from small institutional studies, and therefore optimal treatment methods are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between treatment and survival in sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

METHODS

Six hundred ninety-five patients diagnosed with sinonasal mucosal melanoma between 2004 and 2010 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Treatment modalities and overall survival rates were determined.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival was 21.7%, with a mean survival of 38.4 ± 1.7 months. The majority of patients were treated with surgery alone (31.5%) or surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (41.4%). There was no statistical difference between survival with surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy (25.1% vs 25.1%, p = 0.93). Between the surgery and surgery-with-adjuvant-therapy groups, there was no difference in the number of patients with positive margins (p = 0.54), regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis (p = 0.55), morbidity scores (p = 0.58), insurance status (p = 0.13), age > 60 years (p = 0.24), or treatment at academic centers (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this large review of patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma, adjuvant radiation therapy may not provide a survival benefit as patients tended to do poorly regardless of adjuvant radiation status.

Sphenoid sinus malignancies: a population-based comprehensive analysis

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal malignancies are rare, representing less than 1% of all cancers, with the sphenoid sinus accounting for 1% to 2% of these cases. Sphenoid sinus malignancies exhibit very poor outcomes. There is a paucity of literature describing their histopathological features, incidence trends, treatment, and survival. We seek to elucidate these factors using a national population-based resource.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify malignant sphenoid sinus tumors. The results were analyzed for demographics, incidence, and clinicopathologic trends. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The search identified 472 cases. The mean and median age at diagnosis was 60.0 years. Males represented 54.9% of cases. By race/ethnicity, 82.4% were white and 8.5% were black. The four most common histopathologies were squamous cell neoplasms (29.4%), adenocarcinomas (14.4%), non-Hodgkin's mature B-cell lymphomas (13.1%), and unspecified epithelial neoplasms (11.0%). The overall incidence from 2000 to 2012 was 0.030 per 100,000. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an overall 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 48.1%. Of the most common histopathological subtypes, 5-year DSS was best for mature B-cell NHL (64.0%) and worst for unspecified epithelial neoplasms (25.6%).

CONCLUSION

Sphenoid sinus malignancies are rare, with high prevalence in white males. The most common histopathology is squamous cell neoplasms. They exhibit significant locoregional extension. Of the common sphenoid sinus malignant subtypes, 5-year DSS is best for mature B-cell NHL and worst for unspecified epithelial neoplasms.

Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounts for > 90% of head and neck cancers and 60% to 75% of malignancies of the paranasal sinuses. The most commonly affected paranasal sinus is the maxillary. Epidemiologic, incidence, and survival trends have been studied for maxillary sinus SCC (MSSCC), but far less is known about its metastatic potential.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to extract frequency, incidence, and survival data for MSSCC between 2004 and 2012. The resultant cases were stratified according to patient demographics and collaborative stage information, including extent of disease, lymph node involvement, TNM staging, and regional and distant metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 854 cases of MSSCC were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 66.6 years, with 87.4% presenting at > 50 years. Most patients (65.1%) were male. Whites accounted for 74.6% of cases. A majority (64.3%) of cases presented with stage IV disease. Overall 5-year disease-specific survival was 23.4%. Neck involvement was seen in 7.6% of T1 tumors, 22.2% of T2 tumors, 18.5% of T3 tumors, and 12.2% of T4 tumors. Distant metastasis was not seen in T1-T3 tumors, but was present in 6.8% of T4 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

MSSCC is a rare entity with poor overall prognosis. The majority of patients included in this study were white males aged ≥50 years, with most tumors presenting at advanced stages. Nodal involvement and distant metastasis are poor prognostic indicators. T1-T3 tumors did not metastasize to distant sites.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Sinonasal fibrosarcoma: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

BACKGROUND

Primary fibrosarcoma of the sinonasal region is an infrequently occurring malignant neoplasm. Fibrosarcomas are most commonly found in the extremities, with only 1% of fibrosarcomas reported in the head and neck region. This study analyzes the demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival characteristics of sinonasal fibrosarcoma (SNFS).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973 to 2012) was queried for SNFS cases. Data were analyzed with respect to various demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier model.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cases of fibrosarcoma were identified in the sinonasal region. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.5 years and the mean survival was 119.7 months. There was no gender predilection with a male-to-female ratio of 1.04:1. The maxillary sinus was the most common site of involvement (54.9%), followed by the nasal cavity (23.5%). Five-year survival analysis revealed an overall survival rate of 71.7%, disease-specific survival rate of 77.8%, and relative survival (RS) rate of 78.8%. Disease-specific survival was better among those treated with surgery (with [76.2%] or without [87.5%] adjuvant radiotherapy) than those treated with primary radiotherapy alone (33.3%) (p = 0.0069).

CONCLUSION

SNFS is a rare entity. This study represents the largest series of SNFS to date. The mainstay of treatment for this tumor is surgical resection with or without radiotherapy.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity (NCSCC) is an infrequent malignancy that has been historically difficult to characterize. This study provides new insight into NCSCC utilizing a population-based database. We analyze the propensity for cervical and distant metastasis from NCSCC, as well as survival outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2012) was queried for NCSCC cases. Data were analyzed with respect to various demographic and clinicopathologic factors. The results were further examined for regional and distant metastasis. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier model.

RESULTS

A total of 1,180 cases of NCSCC were identified in the SEER database between 2004 and 2012. The mean age at diagnosis was 65.8 years. American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was known in 1,050 cases, of which 53.4% were stage I, 13.3% were stage II, 10.2% were stage III, and 23.0% were stage IV. By tumor (T) stage classification, T1 was the most common (56.6%), followed by T4 (19.3%). Most cases had no nodal (N) involvement at diagnosis (90.8%). Cervical nodal involvement was present in 9.1% of cases, while distant metastasis was seen in 1.9%. Five-year disease-specific survival was 69.5% overall, 39.6% in cases with neck involvement and 0.0% for metastatic cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the only known population-based investigation of NCSCC. Metastasis to cervical nodes or distant sites, especially with T1 tumors, is rare. However, any cervical involvement or distant metastasis discovered on presentation is a poor prognostic indicator.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 126:560-565, 2016.

Sinonasal malignancies: A population-based analysis of site-specific incidence and survival

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Sinonasal malignancies vary in behavior according to histology and anatomical location. Incidence, survival, and optimal treatment for these lesions are thus uncertain in various cases. Our objective was to utilize a national population-based registry to identify the most common sinonasal histopathologies by anatomical site, and subsequently analyze the data by incidence trends, survival rates, patient demographics, and treatment modalities.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

METHODS

The SEER database was examined for patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignancies between 1973 and 2011. Data were stratified according to anatomical site, incidence, survival, histology, staging, and patient demographics. Therapy-based outcomes were analyzed for cases from 1983 to 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 13,295 patients were identified, with an incidence of 0.83 per 100,000 people. Males comprised 58.6% of cases. Whites represented 81.5% of cases, while blacks comprised 8.7%. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology (41.9%) across all sites of the sinonasal tract. The most common anatomical site of malignancy was the nasal cavity (45.7%), and least common was the frontal sinus (1.2%). For single sites, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was highest for nasal cavity tumors (67.1%) and lowest for overlapping sinus malignancies (37.6%). The overall 5-year DSS for all sinonasal malignancies was 53.7%.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal malignancies are rare entities with poor overall prognosis. By anatomical site, prognosis is best for nasal cavity cancers and worst for overlapping lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.