Surgical management of rhinosinusitis in endoscopic-endonasal skull-base surgery

Impact of Concurrent Chronic Rhinosinusitis on Complication Rates after Endonasal Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Single-Center Experience

Objectives  Preoperative planning of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is essential. The safety of performing surgery before managing sinus pathologies including concurrent chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in patients undergoing ESBS has been questioned. The current study aimed to evaluate and compare the complication rates between patients with and without CRS undergoing ESBS. Design  This is a retrospective study. Setting  Present study was conducted at tertiary referral center. Participants  We included all patients who underwent ESBS between March 2015 and March 2021. However, patients who had surgical revision for remnant tumor, primary sinonasal tumor excision, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage repair were excluded. The presence of concurrent CRS was determined according to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS 2020) criteria by reviewing electronic charts about the preoperative clinical assessment and CT scan images of the paranasal sinuses. Then, the incidence rates of postoperative meningitis, CSF leakage, and surgical site infection were compared between patients with and without concurrent CRS undergoing ESBS. Main Outcome Measures  Postoperative complication rates in patients underwent ESBS with and without CRS. Results  From a total of 130 ESBS cases, 99 patients were included in this study. Among them, 24 had concurrent CRS. One patient presented with postoperative meningitis, one with CSF leakage, and two with surgical site infections. The incidence rate of postoperative meningitis, CSF leakage, and surgical site infection did not significantly differ between patients with and without concurrent CRS. Conclusion  Concurrent CRS is not a contraindication for ESBS. Moreover, simultaneous endoscopic sinus surgery can safely be performed without additional morbidity in ESBS.

Otolaryngology Considerations of Pituitary Surgery: What an Endocrinologist Should Know

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is the preferred surgical approach for the management of pituitary adenomas. Perioperative management of pituitary lesions requires multidisciplinary care and typically includes a dual surgeon team consisting of a neurosurgeon and an otolaryngologist. The involvement of the otolaryngologist allows for a safe surgical approach with excellent intraoperative visualization of the tumor to enable an effective resection of the tumor by the neurosurgeon. Detection and treatment of sinonasal pathology is essential prior to surgery. Patients may experience sinonasal complaints following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, although this is typically temporary. Sinonasal care in the postoperative period can expedite recovery to baseline. Here we discuss the perioperative factors of endoscopic pituitary surgery that endocrinologists should be aware of, ranging from preoperative patient selection and optimization to postoperative care, with a particular emphasis on anatomic and surgical factors.

Clinical Significance of Nasal Pathologies in Transnasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the frequency of nasal pathologies and the significance of surgical access to the sellar region in patients who underwent an operation for sellar mass using the endonasal and microscopic transsphenoidal approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent surgery for pituitary macroadenoma using microscopic (n = 78) and endonasal (n = 20) transsphenoidal approaches. Patients' epicrisis, preoperative, and postoperative imaging as well as their operative notes were reviewed. Nasal pathologies and surgeries performed before or during the pituitary surgery were also documented. All endonasal surgeries were binostril and performed jointly by an ear, nose, and throat specialist and neurosurgeon. To determine the feasibility of endonasal and microscopic approaches, we developed an algorithm using the septum deviation classifications to determine the need for septoplasty.

RESULTS

The most common nasal pathology was septum deviation (n = 17; 17.3%). Of the other nasal pathologies, 6 cases (6%) were chronic sinusitis and 2 were (2.1%) middle turbinate bullosa.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing endonasal transsphenoidal surgery by an ear, nose, and throat surgeon allows for the detection and treatment of nasal pathologies that may lead to serious perioperative and postoperative complications. Evaluating patients with septum deviation using our classification will help determine the necessity of preoperative or perioperative septum surgery, depending on the preferred pituitary surgical method.

Chronic rhinosinusitis as a risk factor for intracranial and extracranial complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery

PURPOSE

To elucidate whether chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), usually an inflammatory-mediated rather than infectious process, is a risk factor for extracranial and intracranial complications after elective endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent ETSS between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, which included chart review and computed tomography assessment. CRS was defined by symptomatology and concurrent endoscopic or radiographic findings.

RESULTS

Of 292 subjects, 11% (n = 33) met criteria for CRS. Median difference in Lund-Mackay scores between the CRS and non-CRS groups was 3.0 (95% CI 2.0-4.0). Complications included acute rhinosinusitis requiring antibiotics (23%, 68/292), epistaxis (10%, 28/292), meningitis (1%, 3/292), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (7%, 20/292), revision sinonasal procedures (10%, 28/292), and frequent in-office debridement (13%, 39/292). CRS was strongly associated with postoperative acute rhinosinusitis (aRR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.90) and frequent debridement (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.00-3.83). Conversely, CRS was not associated with epistaxis (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 0.62-3.72), postoperative CSF leak (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.24-3.44), or additional sinonasal procedures (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.21-2.29). The rate of meningitis was not significantly higher in the CRS cohort (difference 2.2%, 95% CI -1.0% to 14.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CRS was a strong risk factor for acute rhinosinusitis and need for frequent in-office debridement after ETSS. It was not associated with other postoperative complications including epistaxis, CSF leak, or revision sinonasal procedures. CRS patients had a slightly higher rate of meningitis, which is likely not clinically meaningful.

Transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery in the COVID-19 era: Recommendations for increasing the safety of the method

Transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery (eSBS) has been adopted in recent years, in great part to replace the extended procedures required by external approaches. Though sometimes perceived as “minimally invasive”, eSBS still necessitates extensive manipulations within the nose/paranasal sinuses. Furthermore, exposure of susceptible cerebral structures to light and heat emanated by the telescope should be considered to comprehensively evaluate the safety of the method. While the number of studies specifically targeting eSBS safety still remains scarce, the problem has recently expanded with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which also has implications for the safety of the surgical personnel.

It must be stressed that eSBS may directly expose the surgeon to potentially high volumes of virus-contaminated aerosol. Thus, the anxiety of both the patient and the surgeon must be taken into account. Consequently, safety requirements must follow the highest standards. This paper summarizes current knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 biology and the peculiarities of human immunology in respect of the host-virus relationship, taking into account the latest information concerning the SARS-CoV-2 worrisome affinity for the nervous system. Based on this information, a workflow proposal is offered for consideration. This could be useful not only for the duration of the pandemic, but also during the unpredictable timeline involving our coexistence with the virus. Recommendations include technical modifications to the operating theatre, personal protective equipment, standards of testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection, prophylactic pretreatment with interferon, anti-IL6 treatment and, last but not least, psychological support for the patient.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Radiographic Sinus Disease on Preoperative Computed Tomography Imaging in the Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Population

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) provides a safe, minimally invasive approach to treat benign and malignant skull base lesions. The significance of concomitant sinonasal pathology on imaging in patients undergoing ESBS and its effect on perioperative management is not well described. We sought to identify the prevalence and clinical significance of incidentally found radiographic sinus disease on preoperative imaging in patients undergoing ESBS and provide a protocol for management of these patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent ESBS from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed and scored using the Lund-Mackay (LM) staging system. Preoperative nasal endoscopy findings were analyzed. Any preoperative treatment based on these findings and changes in intraoperative management were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (81 women, 74 men) who underwent ESBS were reviewed. The average LM score was 2 ± 2.7 (range: 0-12). A total of 94 patients (60.3%) had evidence of radiographic sinus disease (LM score > 0) and 23 patients (14.7%) had presence of sphenoid sinus disease. Seven patients (4.5%) were treated preoperatively based on CT and/or nasal endoscopy findings. All patients who received preoperative treatment had evidence of sinus disease on imaging with an average score of 4.7 and were evaluated and treated within 1-2 weeks prior to ESBS. One patient had ESBS postponed until endoscopic sinus surgery was performed for extensive chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) findings on imaging.

CONCLUSION

A review of preoperative imaging in patients undergoing ESBS can help identify concurrent sinonasal disease, which has the potential to alter preoperative as well as intraoperative management in these patients. We report a diligent but conservative approach for the treatment of concomitant CRS in the ESBS population with decision for preoperative treatment guided by various factors.

Gelatin Sponge Induced Maxillary Sinusitis After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is a safe, well-established treatment method, but it is associated with several postoperative nasal complications. However, gelatin sponge induced maxillary sinusitis after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has not been reported. In this study, we present an unusual case of gelatin sponge induced maxillary sinusitis after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Therefore, it should be recognized that gelatin sponge induced maxillary sinusitis may occur as a complication after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

Perioperative nasal and paranasal sinus considerations in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary disease

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery has emerged as the treatment modality of choice for a range of skull base lesions, particularly pituitary adenomas. However, navigation and manipulation of the nasal corridor and paranasal sinuses requires that surgeons are aware of effective techniques to maximize patient outcomes and avoid sinonasal morbidity postoperatively. This paper is a narrative review aimed to provide an updated and consolidated report on the perioperative management of the nasal corridor and paranasal sinuses in the setting of endoscopic skull base surgery for pituitary disease. Anatomic variants and common surgical techniques are discussed. Post-operative complications are evaluated in detail. Understanding the structural implications of the endonasal approach to the sphenoid is crucial to optimization of the surgical outcomes. We propose guidelines for perioperative management of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for pituitary diseases. Standardized treatment algorithms can improve patient satisfaction, and increase the comparability and the quality of reported information across research studies.

Revision surgery rates in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: meta-analysis of risk factors

BACKGROUND

Wide variations in revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) rates for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) have been reported. It is important to understand expected revision rates and factors that impact the need for revision.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on studies that reported revision surgery data for CRSwNP patients.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies with 34,220 subjects were meta-analyzed, with an overall revision rate of 18.6% (95% confidence interval, 14.1%-23.6%). Studies with extractable follow-up data reported a mean revision rate of 16.2% over a weighted mean follow-up of 89.6 months. Factors associated with increased revision rates included allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (28.7%), aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (27.2%), asthma (22.6%), prior polypectomy (26.0%), and publication prior to 2008 (22.7%) (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Although polyps can recur after ESS, reported long-term ESS revision rates are approximately 14% to 24%. Identifying risk factors for revision surgery can help manage patient expectations and determine optimal personalized treatments.

Simultaneous Resection of Pituitary Macroadenoma and Sphenoid Sinus Inverted Papilloma: The Challenge of Operating Sinonasal and Skull Base Pathologies Through a Single-Stage Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

BACKGROUND

Coexistence of sinonasal and skull base tumors is uncommon but possible, and the endonasal route seems to be the best option to manage both lesions simultaneously. We report the first case in the English literature of concomitant sphenoid sinus inverted papilloma and pituitary macroadenoma treated through an endoscopic endonasal approach.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 68-year-old man presented with a history of progressive visual loss and nasal obstruction. Clinical examination disclosed bitemporal hemianopsia. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging obtained on admission showed a large sellar/suprasellar enhancing lesion with a marked mass effect on the optic chiasm. Imaging also showed a second mass extending from the sphenoid sinus to the left nasal cavity with obstruction of the maxillary sinus ostium and development of maxillary sinus mucocele. Both tumors were entirely resected by an endoscopic endonasal approach. Additionally, middle meatal antrostomy and marsupialization with drainage of the maxillary mucocele was performed. Biopsy confirmed the coexistence of a pituitary macroadenoma and sphenoid sinus inverted papilloma.

CONCLUSIONS

This case and the literature suggest that patients with concomitant nasal and skull base pathologies can be simultaneously managed. The otolaryngologist plays an essential role in removing the sinonasal lesion to ensure a safe surgical corridor before entering the intracranial cavity and for planning for the skull base reconstruction.

Asymptomatic radiographic sinonasal inflammation does not affect pituitary surgery outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a proposed risk factor for meningitis and other intracranial complications following the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA). Some have recommended staging TSA following surgery for CRS; however, delaying TSA has important ramifications. The objective of this study is to determine whether asymptomatic sinonasal inflammation (RSNI) on preoperative computed tomography scans, without clinical CRS, is associated with postoperative complications following TSA.

METHODS

All consecutive TSA cases performed at a single tertiary care institution from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed for patient demographics, prior surgery, presence of RSNI on preoperative computed tomography scan based on Lund-Mackay (LM) score, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and postoperative complications (postoperative CSF leak, bleeding, infection). The association between preoperative RSNI and postoperative complications was analyzed via multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one cases of TSA were included with mean patient age of 52.6 years, 42.7% males, 18.1% revision cases, and mean LM score of 1.9 ± 2.7. Complications were identified in 9.9% of patients at the following rates: 5.3% postoperative CSF leak, 2.9% bleeding, and 1.8% infection (all sinusitis, no episodes of meningitis). Neither total LM score nor LM score > 5 (representative of clinically significant radiographic CRS) were predictors of any postoperative complication (both P > 0.05). Age, sex, revision status, intraoperative CSF leak, and total LM score were not independent predictors of any postoperative complication on multivariate analysis (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In asymptomatic patients, radiographic evidence of sinonasal inflammation is not associated with increased risk of complications following TSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 129:1545-1548, 2019.

Is Coincidental Rhinosinusitis a Predisposing Factor for Postoperative Central Nervous System Infection After Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery?

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of rhinosinusitis in patients who undergo surgery via the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA).

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery via the EETSA between February 2009 and November 2016. In total, 505 patients were included in the study. Preoperative paranasal sinus computed tomography, sellar magnetic resonance imaging, and nasal endoscopy were performed for all the patients.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients without sphenoid sinusitis underwent surgery with the concomitant transsphenoidal approach and functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and showed no central nervous system (CNS) complication. During surgery via the EETSA, the presence of rhinosinusitis did not significantly affect the incidence of postoperative CNS infection (P = 0.051), except for sphenoid sinusitis (P = 0.003). Conversely, the incidence of postoperative CNS infection was not related significantly to the Lund-Mackay score or tumor size. The risk of CNS infection was 12.151-fold higher in patients with sphenoid sinusitis (95% confidence interval, 3.153-46.827; P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery via the EETSA and functional endoscopic sinus surgery can be safely performed together in most patients with rhinosinusitis. However, sphenoid sinus infection appears to be a predisposing factor for postoperative CNS infection. Therefore, a separate surgical procedure for sphenoid lesions should be considered in these patients before the use of the EETSA.

Principles of Pituitary Surgery

Since the description of a transnasal approach for treatment of pituitary tumors, transsphenoidal surgery has undergone continuous development. Hirsch developed a lateral endonasal approach before simplifying it to a transseptal approach. Cushing approached pituitary tumors using a transsphenoidal approach but transitioned to the transcranial route. Transsphenoidal surgery was not "rediscovered" until Hardy introduced the surgical microscope. An endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for pituitary tumors has been reported and further advanced. We describe the principles of pituitary surgery including the key elements of surgical decision making and discuss the technical nuances distinguishing the endoscopic from the microscopic approach.