The 15° reverse Trendelenburg position can improve visualization without impacting cerebral oxygenation in endoscopic sinus surgery-A prospective, randomized study

Expert consensus on odontogenic maxillary sinusitis multi-disciplinary treatment

ABSTARCT

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) is a subtype of maxillary sinusitis (MS). It is actually inflammation of the maxillary sinus that secondary to adjacent infectious maxillary dental lesion. Due to the lack of unique clinical features, OMS is difficult to distinguish from other types of rhinosinusitis. Besides, the characteristic infectious pathogeny of OMS makes it is resistant to conventional therapies of rhinosinusitis. Its current diagnosis and treatment are thus facing great difficulties. The multi-disciplinary cooperation between otolaryngologists and dentists is absolutely urgent to settle these questions and to acquire standardized diagnostic and treatment regimen for OMS. However, this disease has actually received little attention and has been underrepresented by relatively low publication volume and quality. Based on systematically reviewed literature and practical experiences of expert members, our consensus focuses on characteristics, symptoms, classification and diagnosis of OMS, and further put forward multi-disciplinary treatment decisions for OMS, as well as the common treatment complications and relative managements. This consensus aims to increase attention to OMS, and optimize the clinical diagnosis and decision-making of OMS, which finally provides evidence-based options for OMS clinical management.

Hypotensive Levels on Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Visibility: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

OBJECTIVE

Optimization of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) conditions is a common focus of interest for otolaryngologists and anesthesiologists. Relying on hypotension alone to achieve a bloodless field may not without risks. We sought to determine whether ESS is feasible in the context of moderate hypotension.

METHODS

This randomized non-inferiority trial enrolled 96 adult patients who were to undergo ESS. The patients were divided into two groups: Controlled hypotension group (n = 48, MAP reduction to 55-65 mmHg, minimum of 60% of baseline blood pressure) or Individualized hypotension group (n = 48, MAP reduction to 75-80% of baseline blood pressure). All participants were placed in 10° reverse Trendelenburg position during ESS, and cottonoid patties dammed with epinephrine was recommended to clear the operative field of bleeding. The two groups were compared according to Boezaart grading scale (BS) score, estimated blood loss, blood loss rate, arterial lactate level and postoperative recovery.

RESULTS

Both levels of intraoperative hypotension (62.2 ± 2.3 mmHg vs. 74.0 ± 2.8 mmHg) provided acceptable surgical conditions with no difference in mean BS scores [2.00 (1.88-2.33) vs. 2.00 (1.85-2.45), p = 0.926]. The 95% CI for median value differences in mean BS scores is lower than the preset non-inferiority margin. There were no differences in blood loss rate and estimated blood loss between two groups (p > 0.05) Postoperative arterial lactate and Ramsay sedation scores were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In ESS, both levels of intraoperative hypotension, combined with position adjustment and low-concentration adrenaline to constrict nasal mucosal blood vessels, provided acceptable surgical conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:569-576, 2024.

Hemostasis in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bleeding during endoscopic endonasal procedures can quickly obscure critical anatomic landmarks. This increases both the difficulty of the surgical procedure and the risk of complications faced by the patient. As the indications for surgical management of sinonasal pathology grow, it is important to review techniques to minimize bleeding and facilitate safe surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence continues to accumulate for best practices in the surgical management of sinonasal disease. Recently, international guidelines have attempted to summarize this body of evidence, lending further support to several interventions which have been advocated as methods to decrease bleeding during endoscopic endonasal surgery. Additional studies have specifically investigated the safety of certain commonly employed techniques. The utility of preoperative corticosteroid therapy and the use of total intravenous anesthetic techniques in increasingly validated. Further evidence supports the safety of reverse Trendelenburg positioning for surgical management of inflammatory disease.

SUMMARY

Recent wide scale systematic review of the literature regarding perioperative and intraoperative management of hemostasis has reinforced the utility of certain interventions, while others remain ambiguous.

Inhalational Anesthesia is Noninferior to Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Terms of Surgical Field Visibility in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Purpose

Regarding the quality of surgical field visibility, previous studies and meta-analyses comparing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia (IA) in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have presented inconsistent findings. Considering that IA has some advantages over TIVA, we aimed to test the hypothesis that IA with sevoflurane-remifentanil is noninferior to TIVA with propofol-remifentanil in terms of surgical field visibility quality during ESS.

Patients and Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, noninferiority clinical trial, 110 adult patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the IA (n = 55) or TIVA (n = 55) group. The primary outcome was the quality of surgical field visibility, as measured by the intraoperative mean Boezaart score (BS). Additionally, post hoc analysis was performed for patients with Lund-Mackay scores of ≤ 12 or > 12. Other secondary outcomes included total blood loss, bleeding rate, total fluid, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, dose of remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance, end-tidal CO₂, length of stay in the post anesthesia care unit, postoperative hypoxemia, sore throat, and nausea.

Results

The intraoperative mean BS of the IA group was noninferior to that of the TIVA group [medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), 2.0 (1.7-2.2) vs 2.0 (1.8-2.1), P = 0.923]. Moreover, post hoc analysis confirmed no difference between IA and TIVA for patients with Lund-Mackay scores ≤ 12 (P = 0.403) or > 12 (P = 0.226). No differences in total blood loss, bleeding rate, or other intraoperative indicators or complications were observed between groups.

Conclusion

Regarding surgical field visibility during ESS, IA with sevoflurane-remifentanil is noninferior to TIVA with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia maintenance.

Is nasal airflow disrupted after endoscopic skull base surgery? A short review

Even the most delicate endonasal surgery for skull base lesion causes changes in the nasal cavity, some of them permanent. Morphological changes in the nasal cavity and their consequences (changes in nasal airflow) are often studied by advanced numerical analysis called computational fluid dynamics. This review summarizes current knowledge of endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery effects on nasal airflow. Several studies have shown that endoscopic skull base surgery changes nasal anatomy to the extent that nasal airflow changes significantly postoperatively. Removing any intranasal structure increases the cross-sectional area of the respective nasal meatus, leading to increased nasal airflow in this area while airflow in the narrower periphery decreases. Middle turbinate resection increases airflow in the middle meatus and reduces airflow in the superior and inferior meatus. Small posterior septectomy does not cause a significant change in nasal airflow. Nasal septum deviation is an important factor in airflow changes. Current studies describe nasal changes after rather extensive procedures (e.g., middle turbinectomy, ethmoidectomy) that are unnecessary in routine pituitary adenoma surgery. No studies have compared changes using pre- and postoperative scans of the same patients after actual surgery.

Effect of Deliberate Hypotension on Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Deliberate hypotension can reduce bleeding and improve visualization of the surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). However, hypotension may cause brain hypoperfusion and subsequent ischemic injuries, such as delayed awakening, stroke, postoperative delirium, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can be used to monitor real-time regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) levels to estimate brain perfusion. The present study aimed to evaluate the change in rSO₂ induced by deliberate hypotension during FESS, and assess the impact of deliberate hypotension on the surgical process.

Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was registered with the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR2000039846). A total of 40 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and intervention groups, and finally, 39 patients were analyzed. Deliberate hypotension was induced in the intervention group using nicardipine and esmolol, whereas the control group received general anesthesia without deliberate hypotension. We recorded mean arterial pressure (MAP), saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO₂), rSO₂, and heart rate (HR) before induction of anesthesia (T0), immediately after induction of anesthesia (T1), at the beginning of the operation (corresponding with the establishment of deliberate hypotension) (T2), 10 min (T3) and 20 min (T4) after the operation began, at the end of the operation (corresponding with the end of deliberate hypotension) (T5), and 5 min (T6) and 15 min (T7) after the operation. The partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO₂) was recorded at T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6. The duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, tracheal extubation time, and the number of patients that experienced cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) were recorded. The surgical field was estimated postoperation based on the Fromme score.

Results: A 30% decrease from the baseline MAP resulted in a decrease of intraoperative bleeding, improvement in the quality of the surgical field, and the shortening of the duration of surgery during FESS in the intervention group compared with the control group. In addition, rSO₂ was reduced and no CDEs were experienced in the intervention group. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a correlation between the decline in rSO₂ and that in MAP.

Conclusions: A decrease in MAP to a certain level will cause a decrease of rSO₂ in patients undergoing FESS under general anesthesia. Based on our findings, we recommend that the deliberate hypotensive target indicated by MAP be reduced by 30%, while PetCO₂ is maintained at 35–40 mmHg and HR is maintained at about 60 beats per minute during FESS.

Neurological Involvement in COVID-19 and Potential Mechanisms: A Review

As the current understanding of COVID-19 continues to evolve, a synthesis of the literature on the neurological impact of this novel virus may help inform clinical management and highlight potentially important avenues of investigation. Additionally, understanding the potential mechanisms of neurologic injury may guide efforts to better detect and ameliorate these complications. In this review, we synthesize a range of clinical observations and initial case series describing potential neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 and place these observations in the context of coronavirus neuro-pathophysiology as it may relate to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reported nervous system manifestations range from anosmia and ageusia, to cerebral hemorrhage and infarction. While the volume of COVID-19-related case studies continues to grow, previous work examining related viruses suggests potential mechanisms through which the novel coronavirus may impact the CNS and result in neurological complications. Namely, animal studies examining the SARS-CoV have implicated the angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2 receptor as a mediator of coronavirus-related neuronal damage and have shown that SARS-CoV can infect cerebrovascular endothelium and brain parenchyma, the latter predominantly in the medial temporal lobe, resulting in apoptosis and necrosis. Human postmortem brain studies indicate that human coronavirus variants and SARS-CoV can infect neurons and glia, implying SARS-CoV-2 may have similar neurovirulence. Additionally, studies have demonstrated an increase in cytokine serum levels as a result of SARS-CoV infection, consistent with the notion that cytokine overproduction and toxicity may be a relevant potential mechanism of neurologic injury, paralleling a known pathway of pulmonary injury. We also discuss evidence that suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may be a vasculotropic and neurotropic virus. Early reports suggest COVID-19 may be associated with severe neurologic complications, and several plausible mechanisms exist to account for these observations. A heightened awareness of the potential for neurologic involvement and further investigation into the relevant pathophysiology will be necessary to understand and ultimately mitigate SARS-CoV-2-associated neurologic injury.

Olfactory and taste disorders in healthcare workers with COVID-19 infection

PURPOSE

Severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by COVID-19 has spread globally for the last few months. Healthcare workers (HCW) are overexposed and infection rates are higher than in the rest of the population. Strict clinical assessment is paramount to detect suspicious cases. In this context, olfactory or taste dysfunction (OTD) appears as an early and frequent symptom. Evaluating its presence in early stages plays an important role nowadays.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive observational single-center study among 256 HCW at Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada affected by COVID-19 and confirmed using RT-PCR. A telephonic interview was performed, after obtaining oral informed consent.

RESULTS

OTD was present in up to 70% of the cases as an early symptom, including mild-to-severe cases. The extent of these sensory deficits lasted an average of 11 days. In 26% of the patients, these sensory alterations persisted for over a month.

CONCLUSION

OTD is reported as an early symptom among HCW with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Its strong association with test positivity is useful in the management of the infection and should be enough to indicate preventive isolation. We consider that OTD needs to be included in clinical screening questionnaires in HCW.

Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered

BACKGROUND

From the start of the pandemic, many European otolaryngologists observed an unprecendented number of anosmic patients. Early reports proposed that anosmia could be the first or even the only symptom of COVID-19 infection, prompting calls for self-isolation in affected patients.

METHODS

In the present article, we review the COVID-19 anosmia literature and try to answer the following two questions: first, why is COVID-19 infection responsible for such a high incidence of anosmia? Second, in patients with more severe forms is anosmia really less prevalent and why?

RESULTS

In terms of the etiology of olfactory dysfunction, several hypotheses were proposed at the outset of the pandemic; that olfactory cleft inflammation and obstruction caused a localized conductive loss, that there was injury to the sustentacular supporting cells in the olfactory epithelium or, given the known neurotropic potential of coronavirus, that the virus could invade and damage the olfactory bulb. Olfactory cleft obstruction may contribute to the olfactory dysfunction in some patients, perhaps most likely in those that show very early resolution, it cannot account for the loss in all patients. Moreover, disordered regrowth and a predominance of immature neurons have been shown to be associated with parosmia, which is a common finding amongst patients with Covid-related anosmia. A central mechanism therefore certainly seems to be consistent with the group of patients with more prolonged olfactory deficits. Sustentacular cells showing ACE-2 immunohistochemical expression 200 to 700 times greater than nasal or tracheal epithelia seem to be the main SARS-CoV-2 gateway. As the pathophysiology of COVID-19 anosmia seems to be better understood, the question of why patients with a moderate to severe form of COVID-19 infection have less olfactory involvement remains unresolved. Different potential explanations are discussed in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The last 5 months have benefited from great international collaborative research, first highlighting and then proving the value of loss of smell and taste as a symptom of COVID-19. Adoption of loss of smell into the case definition by international public health bodies will facilitate control of disease transmission.