Early administration of fibrinogen concentrates improves the short-term outcomes of severe pelvic fracture patients

Blood failure: traumatic hemorrhage and the interconnections between oxygen debt, endotheliopathy, and coagulopathy

This review explores the concept of "blood failure" in traumatic injury, which arises from the interplay of oxygen debt, the endotheliopathy of trauma (EoT), and acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC). Traumatic hemorrhage leads to the accumulation of oxygen debt, which can further exacerbate hemorrhage by triggering a cascade of events when severe. Such events include EoT, characterized by endothelial glycocalyx damage, and ATC, involving platelet dysfunction, fibrinogen depletion, and dysregulated fibrinolysis. To manage blood failure effectively, a multifaceted approach is crucial. Damage control resuscitation strategies such as use of permissive hypotension, early hemorrhage control, and aggressive transfusion of blood products including whole blood aim to minimize oxygen debt and promote its repayment while addressing endothelial damage and coagulation. Transfusions of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets, as well as the use of tranexamic acid, play key roles in hemostasis and countering ATC. Whole blood, whether fresh or cold-stored, is emerging as a promising option to address multiple needs in traumatic hemorrhage. This review underscores the intricate relationships between oxygen debt, EoT, and ATC and highlights the importance of comprehensive, integrated strategies in the management of traumatic hemorrhage to prevent blood failure. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to address these interconnected factors effectively and to improve patient outcomes.

Cryoprecipitate use during massive transfusion: A propensity score analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cryoprecipitate is frequently administered as an adjunct to balanced transfusion in the setting of traumatic hemorrhage. However, civilian studies have not demonstrated a clear survival advantage, and prior observational studies noted selection bias when analyzing cryoprecipitate use. Additionally, due to the logistics involved in cryoprecipitate administration, it is inconsistently implemented alongside standardized massive transfusion protocols. This study aims to evaluate the effects of early cryoprecipitate administration on inpatient mortality in the setting of massive transfusion for exsanguinating trauma and to use propensity score analysis to minimize selection bias.

METHODS

The registry of an urban level 1 trauma center was queried for adult patients who received at least 6 units of packed red blood cells within 4 h of presentation. Univariate analysis, multiple logistic regression, and propensity score matching were performed.

RESULTS

562 patients were identified. Patients with lower median RTS (6.86 (IQR 4.09-7.84) vs 7.6 (IQR 5.97-7.84), P<0.01), decreased Glasgow coma scale (12 (IQR 4-15) vs 15 (IQR 10-15), P<0.01), and increased lactate (7.5 (IQR 4.3-10.2) vs 4.9 (IQR 3.1-7.2), P<0.01) were more commonly administered cryoprecipitate. Mortality was greater among those who received cryoprecipitate (40.2% vs 23.7%, p<0.01) on univariate analysis. Neither multiple logistic regression (OR 0.917; 95% confidence interval 0.462-1.822; p = 0.805) nor propensity score matching (average treatment effect on the treated 2.3%, p = 0.77) revealed that cryoprecipitate administration was associated with a difference in inpatient mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving cryoprecipitate within 4 h of presentation were more severely injured at presentation and had increased inpatient mortality. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score analysis failed to show that early administration of cryoprecipitate was associated with survival benefit for exsanguinating trauma patients. The prospect of definitively assessing the utility of cryoprecipitate in exsanguinating hemorrhage warrants prospective investigation.

Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread institution of modern massive transfusion protocols with balanced blood product ratios, survival for patients with traumatic hemorrhage receiving ultramassive transfusion (UMT) (defined as ≥20 U of packed red blood cells [RBCs]) in 24 hours) remains low and resource consumption remains high. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with mortality in trauma patients receiving UMT in the modern resuscitation era.

METHODS

An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter retrospective study of 461 trauma patients from 17 trauma centers who received ≥20 U of RBCs in 24 hours was performed (2014-2019). Multivariable logistic regression and Classification and Regression Tree analysis were used to identify clinical characteristics associated with mortality.

RESULTS

The 461 patients were young (median age, 35 years), male (82%), severely injured (median Injury Severity Score, 33), in shock (median shock index, 1.2; base excess, -9), and transfused a median of 29 U of RBCs, 22 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 24 U of platelets (PLT). Mortality was 46% at 24 hours and 65% at discharge. Transfusion of RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 or RBC/PLT ≥1.5:1 was significantly associated with mortality, most pronounced for the 18% of patients who received both RBC/PLT and RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 (odds ratios, 3.11 and 2.81 for mortality at 24 hours and discharge; both p < 0.01). Classification and Regression Tree identified that age older than 50 years, low initial Glasgow Coma Scale, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy were associated with low likelihood of survival (14-26%), while absence of these factors was associated with the highest survival (71%).

CONCLUSION

Despite modern massive transfusion protocols, one half of trauma patients receiving UMT are transfused with either RBC/FFP or RBC/PLT in unbalanced ratios ≥1.5:1, with increased associated mortality. Maintaining focus on balanced ratios during UMT is critical, and consideration of advanced age, poor initial mental status, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy can aid in prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Use of fibrinogen concentrate for trauma-related bleeding: A systematic-review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Trauma-induced coagulopathy contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in patients who experience trauma-related bleeding. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of preemptive and goal-directed fibrinogen concentrate (FC) in the management of trauma-related hemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were systematically searched. All trial designs, except individual case reports, which evaluated the preemptive or goal-directed use of FC for trauma-related bleeding/coagulopathy, in patients older than 16 years, were included in the systematic review. For the included randomized controlled trials comparing FC with control, meta-analysis was performed and a risk-of bias-assessment was completed using the Cochrane Methodology and Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 2,743 studies were identified; 26 were included in the systematic review, and 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 238) were included in the meta-analysis. For the primary outcome of mortality, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups, with 22% and 23.4% in the FC and comparator arms, respectively (risk ratio, 1.00 [95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 2.56]; p = 0.99). In addition, there was no statistical difference between FC and control in packed red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, or platelet transfusion requirements, and thromboembolic events. Overall, the quality of evidence was graded as low to moderate because of concerns with risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.

CONCLUSION

Further high-quality, adequately powered studies are needed to assess the impact of FC in trauma, with a focus on administration as early as possible from the point of entry into the trauma system of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and Meta-analysis, level II.

Current perspective on fibrinogen concentrate in critical bleeding

INTRODUCTION

. Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates.

AREAS COVERED

. We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events.

EXPERT OPINION

. Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.

Effects of in-house cryoprecipitate on transfusion usage and mortality in patients with multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypofibrinogenaemia is a common complication of multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of the head ≥4; body ≥3). In Japan, neither fibrinogen concentrate nor cryoprecipitate is permitted to treat acquired hypofibrinogenaemia with the purpose of rapidly restoring a haemostatic level of fibrinogen. The aim of this study was to investigate transfusion usage and mortality in patients with multiple trauma and severe traumatic brain injury who were given a cryoprecipitate prepared in-house, comparing those administered the product early or later.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prepared and produced cryoprecipitate from fresh-frozen plasma beginning in March 2013. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to our single tertiary medical centre with severe multiple trauma with traumatic brain injury from March 2013 to June 2018, sorting them into those given the cryoprecipitate infusion within 90 minutes of admission (Early group) and those given it more than 90 minutes after admission (Late group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and the Wilcoxon test as appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 26 and 16 patients in the Early and Late groups, respectively. The 24-hour mortality tended to be lower in the Early group than in the Late group (8 vs 13%, respectively). The patients were more severely anaemic and thrombocytopenic after haemostatic therapy in the Late group than in the Early group. Transfusion usage in the Early group was lower than that in the Late group (red blood cells: 7±1 units vs 17±3 units, p<0.05; fresh-frozen plasma: 9±1 units vs 16±3 units, p<0.05; platelet concentrate: 3±1 units vs 15±4 units, p<0.05, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Early administration of an in-house cryoprecipitate may reduce transfusion usage in patients with multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury.

Blood transfusion management in the severely bleeding military patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable death on the battlefield and in civilian trauma. Hemorrhage control is multifactorial and starts with point-of-injury care. Surgical hemorrhage control and time from injury to surgery is paramount; however, interventions in the prehospital environment and perioperative period affect outcomes. The purpose of this review is to understand concepts and strategies for successful management of the bleeding military patient. Understanding the life-threatening nature of coagulopathy of trauma and implementing strategies aimed at full spectrum hemorrhage management from point of injury to postoperative care will result in improved outcomes in patients with life-threatening bleeding.

RECENT FINDINGS

Timely and appropriate therapies impact survival. Blood product resuscitation for life-threatening hemorrhage should either be with whole blood or a component therapy strategy that recapitulates the functionality of whole blood. The US military has transfused over 10 000 units of whole blood since the beginning of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The well recognized therapeutic benefits of whole blood have pushed this therapy far forward into prehospital care in both US and international military forces. Multiple hemostatic adjuncts are available that are likely beneficial to the bleeding military patient; and other products and techniques are under active investigation.

SUMMARY

Lessons learned in the treatment of combat casualties will likely continue to have positive impact and influence and the management of hemorrhage in the civilian trauma setting.