Interferon beta-1a for early multiple sclerosis: CHAMPS trial subgroup analyses

The need for a strategic therapeutic approach: multiple sclerosis in check

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune neurological disease. Its therapeutic management has drastically evolved in the recent years with the development of specific disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Together with the established injectables, oral and intravenous alternatives are now available for MS patients with significant benefits to modulate the disease course. Certain drugs present with a higher efficacy than the others, profiles and frequencies of adverse events differentiate as well. Thus due to the several and different treatment alternatives, the therapeutic approach adopted by neurologists requires a tactical focus for a targeted, timed, and meaningful treatment decision. An integration of rational and emotional control with proper communication skills is necessary for shared decision-making with patients. In this perspective paper, we reinforce the necessary concept of strategic MS treatment approach using all available therapies based on scientific evidence and current experience. We apply a didactic analogy to the strategic game chess. The opening with oriented attack (i.e. already in early disease stages as clinical isolated syndrome), a correct choice of chess pieces to move (i.e. among the several DMTs), a re-assessment reaction to different scenarios (e.g. sustained disease activity, adverse events, and family planning) and the advantage of real-world data are discussed to try the best approach to ultimately successfully approach the best personalized MS treatment.

Assessment of delayed diagnosis and treatment in multiple sclerosis patients during 1990-2016

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common inflammatory demyelinating disease in the central nervous system. It is one of the major causes of disability in young adults. Early diagnosis and treatment of this disease could decrease later disability and additional costs. In this cross-sectional analytical study, a total of 351 patients were selected from among the multiple sclerosis patients that went to MS clinic or neurologic clinic in 1990-2016. Data were collected and analysed by SPSS v16. This study was conducted on 82.6% females and 17.4% males. Family history of MS was positive in 12.8% of cases. Mean time of onset of symptoms till first medical visit was 3.25 months. Mean time from first medical visit to diagnosis was 14.98 months. Mean time from onset of symptoms till diagnosis was 18.01 months and the mean time from onset of symptoms till initiation of treatment was 18.73 months. Also, 29.3% of cases had delay in first medical visit and 42.2% of cases had delay in diagnosis of MS more than 6 weeks from first medical visit. Overall, delay in first medical visit and diagnosis of MS has decreased over the years. However, there is still delay in diagnosis of MS. Factors associated with delay are low education, male gender, living in rural areas, primary progressive MS, age at MS diagnosis and first clinical symptoms.

Babesia microti infection in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab

Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Rare parasitic infections have been reported in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders using rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 antibody used off-label for the treatment of MS. Here, we report a patient with MS on ocrelizumab with B-cell depletion who developed severe Babesia microti (B. microti) infection with neutropenia, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia. He recovered after prompt diagnosis and treatment. This case represents the first published occurrence of babesiosis in a patient with MS on ocrelizumab. It also adds to the accumulating evidence from databases of emergent severe or relapsing B. microti infection in patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies. This presentation stresses the diagnostic vigilance required by MS neurologists in endemic areas to identify cases of babesiosis in patients on anti-CD20 therapy and to better counsel these individuals on their risks of B. microti infection.

Interferons and Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons from 25 Years of Clinical and Real-World Experience with Intramuscular Interferon Beta-1a (Avonex)

Recombinant interferon (IFN) β-1b was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as the first disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1993. Since that time, clinical trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of IFN therapies. The pivotal intramuscular IFN β-1a phase III trial published in 1996 was the first to demonstrate that a DMT could reduce accumulation of sustained disability in MS. Patient adherence to treatment is higher with intramuscular IFN β-1a, given once weekly, than with subcutaneous formulations requiring multiple injections per week. Moreover, subcutaneous IFN β-1a is associated with an increased incidence of injection-site reactions and neutralizing antibodies compared with intramuscular administration. In recent years, revisions to MS diagnostic criteria have improved clinicians' ability to identify patients with MS and have promoted the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and disease monitoring. MRI studies show that treatment with IFN β-1a, relative to placebo, reduces T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions and gray matter atrophy. Since the approval of intramuscular IFN β-1a, a number of high-efficacy therapies have been approved for MS, though the benefit of these high-efficacy therapies should be balanced against the increased risk of serious adverse events associated with their long-term use. For some subpopulations of patients, including pregnant women, the safety profile of IFN β formulations may provide a particular benefit. In addition, the antiviral properties of IFNs may indicate potential therapeutic opportunities for IFN β in reducing the risk of viral infections such as COVID-19.

Subgroup analysis of clinical and MRI outcomes in participants with a first clinical demyelinating event at risk of multiple sclerosis in the ORACLE-MS study

BACKGROUND

In the Phase 3, 96-week ORACLE-MS study, cladribine 10 mg tablets (3.5 mg/kg or 5.25 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years) significantly reduced the rate of conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) per the Poser criteria (henceforth referred to as CDMS), multiple sclerosis (MS) per the 2005 McDonald criteria, and the number of new or persisting T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), new or enlarging T2, and combined unique active (CUA) lesions versus placebo in participants with a first clinical demyelinating event (FCDE). Patient demographic and disease characteristics may be predictors of disease progression. The current study analyzed the effect of cladribine tablets in subgroups of participants in the ORACLE-MS study by baseline demographics and disease characteristics.

METHODS

This analysis retrospectively examined data collected from 616 participants enrolled in the ORACLE-MS study (placebo, n=206; cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg, n=206; cladribine tablets 5.25 mg/kg, n=204). Five subgroups were predetermined by baseline demographics, including sex, age (<30 or ≥30 years), classification of FCDE, and lesion characteristics, including absence or presence of T1 Gd+ lesions and number of T2 lesions (<9 or ≥9). Selected endpoints of the ORACLE-MS study were re-analyzed for these subgroups. The primary and main secondary endpoints were time to conversion to CDMS and MS (2005 McDonald criteria), respectively. Secondary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) endpoints included cumulative T1 Gd+ and new or enlarging T2 lesions. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate time to conversion to CDMS and MS (2005 McDonald criteria). This analysis focused primarily on the results for the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group because this dosage is approved for relapsing forms of MS.

RESULTS

In the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population, cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg significantly reduced the risk of conversion to CDMS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.326; P<0.0001) and MS (2005 McDonald criteria; HR=0.485; P<0.0001) versus placebo. Similar effects of cladribine tablets on risk of conversion were observed in post hoc analyses of subgroups defined by various baseline characteristics. In both the ITT population and across subgroups, cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg reduced the numbers of cumulative T1 Gd+ (range of rate ratios: 0.106-0.399), new or enlarging T2 (range of rate ratios: 0.178-0.485), and CUA (range of rate ratios: 0.154-0.384) lesions versus placebo (all nominal P<0.03). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models revealed that age (HR=0.577, nominal P<0.0001), FCDE classification (HR=0.738, nominal P=0.0043), presence of T1 Gd+ lesions (HR=0.554, nominal P<0.0001), and number of T2 lesions (HR=0.417, nominal P<0.0001) at baseline were factors associated with risk of conversion to MS (2005 McDonald criteria), whereas no baseline factors examined were associated with risk of conversion to CDMS.

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis of the ORACLE-MS study, cladribine tablets reduced the risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis and lesion burden in participants with an FCDE in the overall ITT population and multiple subgroups defined by baseline demographics and lesion characteristics.

Clinical Parameters to Predict Future Clinical Disease Activity After Treatment Change to Higher-Dose Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a From Other Platform Injectables in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Objective: To identify predictors of clinical disease activity after treatment change to higher-dose interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: This was a retrospective-prospective observational multicenter study. We enrolled patients with at least one relapse on platform injectable therapy who were changed to 44 μg interferon beta-1a. Our primary endpoint was the clinical disease activity-free (cDAF) status at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Secondary endponts included relapse-free status and disability progression-free status at different timepoints. The primary predictor of interest was the monosymptomatic vs. polysymptomatic index relapse, based on the number of affected functional systems from the Kurtzke scale during the last relapse prior to baseline. Other secondary predictors of clinical disease activity were analyzed based on different demographic and relapse characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of remaining in cDAF status were performed. The time to clinical disease activity was compared between groups using univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression. Multivariate analyses were processed in the form of CART (Classification & Regression Trees).

Results: A total of 300 patients entered the study; 233 (77.7%) of them completed the 24-month study period and 67 patients (22.3%) terminated early. The proportion of patients in cDAF status was 84.7, 69.5, 57.5, and 54.2% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. After 2 years of follow-up, 55.9% of patients remained relapse-free and 87.8% of patients remained disability progression-free. At all timepoints, the polysymptomatic index relapse was the most significant predictor of clinical disease activity of all studied variables. Hazard ratio of cDAF status for patients with monosymptomatic vs. polysymptomatic index relapse was 1.94 (95% CI 1.38–2.73). CART analyses also confirmed the polysymptomatic index relapse being the strongest predictor of clinical disease activity, followed by higher number of pre-baseline relapses with the most significant effect in the monosymptomatic index relapse group. The next strongest predictors of clinical disease activity were cerebellar syndrome as the most disabled Kurtzke functional system for the monosymptomatic relapse group, and age at first MS symptom ≥ 45 for the polysymptomatic relapse group.

Conclusions: Patients with a polysymptomatic index relapse and/or higher number of relapses within 2 years prior to baseline are at high risk of clinical disease activity, despite treatment change to higher-dose interferon beta-1a from other platform injectable therapy.

Trial registration: State Institute of Drug Control (SUKL), URL: http://www.sukl.eu/modules/nps/index.php?h=study&a=detail&id=958&lang=2, registration number 1205090000.

Autoimmune and demyelinating optic neuritis

The knowledge on demyelinating and autoimmune optic neuropathies has experienced a revolution the last decade since the discovery of anti-aquaporin 4 antibody. Improvements in diagnostic techniques, and the finding of new targets, along with advances in neuro-immunology have led to the detection of antibodies related to demyelinating diseases. A review is presented on the classical and new concepts in optic neuritis. The debate on the classification of demyelinating and autoimmune optic neuritis is presented. Furthermore, the updated diagnostic criteria in multiple sclerosis and neuro-myelitis optics are described. Finally, the latest insights into Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) disorders and chronic-recurring optic neuropathies (CRION) are highlited.

Drug Treatment of Clinically Isolated Syndrome

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that leads to inflammation, demyelination and ultimately axonal degeneration. In most cases, it is preceded by its precursor, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) with conversion rates to clinically definite MS (CDMS) of roughly 20-75%. Neurologists are therefore faced with the challenge of initiating a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) as early as possible to favorably influence the course of the disease. During the past 20 years, a multitude of drugs have been incorporated into our therapeutic armamentarium for MS and CIS. Choosing the right drug for an individual patient is complex and should be based not only on the drug's overall efficacy to prevent disease progression but also its specific adverse reaction profile, the severity of individual disease courses and, finally, patient compliance in order to adequately weigh associated risks and benefits. Here, we review the available data on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DMTs tested for CIS and discuss their value regarding a delay of progression to CDMS.

Targeted Oligodendrocyte Apoptosis in Optic Nerve Leads to Persistent Demyelination

The optic nerve represents one of the simplest regions of the CNS and has been useful in developing an understanding of glial development and myelination. While the visual system is frequently affected in demyelinating conditions, utilizing the optic nerve to model demyelination/remyelination studies has been difficult due to its accessibility, relatively small size, and dense nature that makes direct injections challenging. Taking advantage of the lack of oligodendrocytes and myelination in the mouse retina, we have developed a model in which the induction of apoptosis in mature oligodendrocytes allows for the selective, non-invasive generation of demyelinating lesions in optic nerve. Delivery of an inducer of oligodendrocyte apoptosis by intravitreous injection minimizes trauma to the optic nerve and allows for the assessment of oligodendrocyte death in the absence of injury related factors. Here we show that following induction of apoptosis, oligodendrocytes are lost within 3 days. The loss of oligodendrocytes is associated with limited microglial and astrocyte response, is patchy along the nerve, and results in localized myelin loss. Unlike in other regions of the murine CNS, where local demyelination stimulates activation of local oligodendrocyte precursors and remyelination, optic nerve demyelination induced by oligodendrocyte apoptosis fails to recover and results in persistent areas of myelin loss. Over time these chronic lesions change cellular composition and ultimately become devoid of GFAP+ astrocytes and OPCs. Why the optic nerve lesions fail to repair may reflect the lack of early immune responsiveness and provide a novel model of chronic demyelination.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

At the time of publication of the most recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance [technology appraisal (TA) 32] in 2002 on beta-interferon (IFN-β) and glatiramer acetate (GA) for multiple sclerosis, there was insufficient evidence of their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake (1) systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IFN-β and GA in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) compared with best supportive care (BSC) and each other, investigating annualised relapse rate (ARR) and time to disability progression confirmed at 3 months and 6 months and (2) cost-effectiveness assessments of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for CIS and RRMS compared with BSC and each other.

REVIEW METHODS

Searches were undertaken in January and February 2016 in databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and the Science Citation Index. We limited some database searches to specific start dates based on previous, relevant systematic reviews. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts with recourse to a third when needed. The Cochrane tool and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and Philips checklists were used for appraisal. Narrative synthesis and, when possible, random-effects meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed. Cost-effectiveness analysis used published literature, findings from the Department of Health's risk-sharing scheme (RSS) and expert opinion. A de novo economic model was built for CIS. The base case used updated RSS data, a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective, a 50-year time horizon, 2014/15 prices and a discount rate of 3.5%. Outcomes are reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We undertook probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 6420 publications were identified, of which 63 relating to 35 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. In total, 86% had a high risk of bias. There was very little difference between drugs in reducing moderate or severe relapse rates in RRMS. All were beneficial compared with BSC, giving a pooled rate ratio of 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.76] for ARR and a hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.87) for time to disability progression confirmed at 3 months. NMA suggested that 20 mg of GA given subcutaneously had the highest probability of being the best at reducing ARR. Three separate cost-effectiveness searches identified > 2500 publications, with 26 included studies informing the narrative synthesis and model inputs. In the base case using a modified RSS the mean incremental cost was £31,900 for pooled DMTs compared with BSC and the mean incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 0.943, giving an ICER of £33,800 per QALY gained for people with RRMS. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis the ICER was £34,000 per QALY gained. In sensitivity analysis, using the assessment group inputs gave an ICER of £12,800 per QALY gained for pooled DMTs compared with BSC. Pegylated IFN-β-1 (125 µg) was the most cost-effective option of the individual DMTs compared with BSC (ICER £7000 per QALY gained); GA (20 mg) was the most cost-effective treatment for CIS (ICER £16,500 per QALY gained).

LIMITATIONS

Although we built a de novo model for CIS that incorporated evidence from our systematic review of clinical effectiveness, our findings relied on a population diagnosed with CIS before implementation of the revised 2010 McDonald criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

DMTs were clinically effective for RRMS and CIS but cost-effective only for CIS. Both RCT evidence and RSS data are at high risk of bias. Research priorities include comparative studies with longer follow-up and systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016043278.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Trial of Minocycline in a Clinically Isolated Syndrome of Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

On the basis of encouraging preliminary results, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether minocycline reduces the risk of conversion from a first demyelinating event (also known as a clinically isolated syndrome) to multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

During the period from January 2009 through July 2013, we randomly assigned participants who had had their first demyelinating symptoms within the previous 180 days to receive either 100 mg of minocycline, administered orally twice daily, or placebo. Administration of minocycline or placebo was continued until a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was established or until 24 months after randomization, whichever came first. The primary outcome was conversion to multiple sclerosis (diagnosed on the basis of the 2005 McDonald criteria) within 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes included conversion to multiple sclerosis within 24 months after randomization and changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months and 24 months (change in lesion volume on T₂-weighted MRI, cumulative number of new lesions enhanced on T₁-weighted MRI ["enhancing lesions"], and cumulative combined number of unique lesions [new enhancing lesions on T₁-weighted MRI plus new and newly enlarged lesions on T₂-weighted MRI]).

RESULTS

A total of 142 eligible participants underwent randomization at 12 Canadian multiple sclerosis clinics; 72 participants were assigned to the minocycline group and 70 to the placebo group. The mean age of the participants was 35.8 years, and 68.3% were women. The unadjusted risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis within 6 months after randomization was 61.0% in the placebo group and 33.4% in the minocycline group, a difference of 27.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4 to 43.9; P=0.001). After adjustment for the number of enhancing lesions at baseline, the difference in the risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis within 6 months after randomization was 18.5 percentage points (95% CI, 3.7 to 33.3; P=0.01); the unadjusted risk difference was not significant at the 24-month secondary outcome time point (P=0.06). All secondary MRI outcomes favored minocycline over placebo at 6 months but not at 24 months. Trial withdrawals and adverse events of rash, dizziness, and dental discoloration were more frequent among participants who received minocycline than among those who received placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of conversion from a clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis was significantly lower with minocycline than with placebo over 6 months but not over 24 months. (Funded by the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00666887 .).

Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of multiple sclerosis has changed over the last 20 years. The advent of disease-modifying drugs in the mid-1990s heralded a period of rapid progress in the understanding and management of multiple sclerosis. With the support of magnetic resonance imaging early diagnosis is possible, enabling treatment initiation at the time of the first clinical attack. As most of the disease-modifying drugs are associated with adverse events, patients and clinicians need to weigh the benefit and safety of the various early treatment options before taking informed decisions.

OBJECTIVES

1. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for the treatment of a first clinical attack suggestive of MS compared either with placebo or no treatment;2. to assess the relative efficacy and safety of disease-modifying drugs according to their benefit and safety;3. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for treatment started after a first attack ('early treatment') compared with treatment started after a second attack or at another later time point ('delayed treatment').

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO trials registry, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports, and searched for unpublished studies (until December 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and observational studies that evaluated one or more drugs as monotherapy in adult participants with a first clinical attack suggestive of MS. We considered evidence on alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a (Rebif®, Avonex®), laquinimod, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, rituximab and teriflunomide.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two teams of three authors each independently selected studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes were disability-worsening, relapses, occurrence of at least one serious adverse event (AE) and withdrawing from the study or discontinuing the drug because of AEs. Time to conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS) defined by Poser diagnostic criteria, and probability to discontinue the treatment or dropout for any reason were recorded as secondary outcomes. We synthesized study data using random-effects meta-analyses and performed indirect comparisons between drugs. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) along with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes. We estimated the absolute effects only for primary outcomes. We evaluated the credibility of the evidence using the GRADE system.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 randomised trials, eight open-label extension studies (OLEs) and four cohort studies published between 2010 and 2016. The overall risk of bias was high and the reporting of AEs was scarce. The quality of the evidence associated with the results ranges from low to very low. Early treatment versus placebo during the first 24 months' follow-upThere was a small, non-significant advantage of early treatment compared with placebo in disability-worsening (6.4% fewer (13.9 fewer to 3 more) participants with disability-worsening with interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) or teriflunomide) and in relapses (10% fewer (20.3 fewer to 2.8 more) participants with relapses with teriflunomide). Early treatment was associated with 1.6% fewer participants with at least one serious AE (3 fewer to 0.2 more). Participants on early treatment were on average 4.6% times (0.3 fewer to 15.4 more) more likely to withdraw from the study due to AEs. This result was mostly driven by studies on interferon beta 1-b, glatiramer acetate and cladribine that were associated with significantly more withdrawals for AEs. Early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.60). Comparing active interventions during the first 24 months' follow-upIndirect comparison of interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) with teriflunomide did not show any difference on reducing disability-worsening (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.66). We found no differences between the included drugs with respect to the hazard of conversion to CDMS. Interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) and teriflunomide were associated with fewer dropouts because of AEs compared with interferon beta-1b, cladribine and glatiramer acetate (ORs range between 0.03 and 0.29, with substantial uncertainty). Early versus delayed treatmentWe did not find evidence of differences between early and delayed treatments for disability-worsening at a maximum of five years' follow-up (3% fewer participants with early treatment (15 fewer to 11.1 more)). There was important variability across interventions; early treatment with interferon beta-1b considerably reduced the odds of participants with disability-worsening during three and five years' follow-up (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.84 and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89). The early treatment group had 19.6% fewer participants with relapses (26.7 fewer to 12.7 fewer) compared to late treatment at a maximum of five years' follow-up and early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS at any follow-up up to 10 years (i.e. over five years' follow-up HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73). We did not draw any conclusions on long-term serious AEs or discontinuation due to AEs because of inadequacies in the available data both in the included OLEs and cohort studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low-quality evidence suggests a small and uncertain benefit with early treatment compared with placebo in reducing disability-worsening and relapses. The advantage of early treatment compared with delayed on disability-worsening was heterogeneous depending on the actual drug used and based on very low-quality evidence. Low-quality evidence suggests that the chances of relapse are less with early treatment compared with delayed. Early treatment reduced the hazard of conversion to CDMS compared either with placebo, no treatment or delayed treatment, both in short- and long-term follow-up. Low-quality evidence suggests that early treatment is associated with fewer participants with at least one serious AE compared with placebo. Very low-quality evidence suggests that, compared with placebo, early treatment leads to more withdrawals or treatment discontinuation due to AEs. Difference between drugs on short-term benefit and safety was uncertain because few studies and only indirect comparisons were available. Long-term safety of early treatment is uncertain because of inadequately reported or unavailable data.

Quantifying risk of early relapse in patients with first demyelinating events: Prediction in clinical practice

Background:

Characteristics at clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) examination assist in identification of patient at highest risk of early second attack and could benefit the most from early disease-modifying drugs (DMDs).

Objective:

To examine determinants of second attack and validate a prognostic nomogram for individualised risk assessment of clinical conversion.

Methods:

Patients with CIS were prospectively followed up in the MSBase Incident Study. Predictors of clinical conversion were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Prognostic nomograms were derived to calculate conversion probability and validated using concordance indices.

Results:

A total of 3296 patients from 50 clinics in 22 countries were followed up for a median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) of 1.92 years (0.90, 3.71). In all, 1953 (59.3%) patients recorded a second attack. Higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at baseline, first symptom location, oligoclonal bands and various brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics were all predictors of conversion. Conversely, older age and DMD exposure post-CIS were associated with reduced rates. Prognostic nomograms demonstrated high concordance between estimated and observed conversion probabilities.

Conclusion:

This multinational study shows that age at CIS onset, DMD exposure, EDSS, multiple brain and spinal MRI criteria and oligoclonal bands are associated with shorter time to relapse. Nomogram assessment may be useful in clinical practice for estimating future clinical conversion.

Revised Recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Multiple Sclerosis

An international group of neurologists and radiologists developed revised guidelines for standardized brain and spinal cord MR imaging for the diagnosis and follow-up of MS. A brain MR imaging with gadolinium is recommended for the diagnosis of MS. A spinal cord MR imaging is recommended if the brain MR imaging is nondiagnostic or if the presenting symptoms are at the level of the spinal cord. A follow-up brain MR imaging with gadolinium is recommended to demonstrate dissemination in time and ongoing clinically silent disease activity while on treatment, to evaluate unexpected clinical worsening, to re-assess the original diagnosis, and as a new baseline before starting or modifying therapy. A routine brain MR imaging should be considered every 6 months to 2 years for all patients with relapsing MS. The brain MR imaging protocol includes 3D T1-weighted, 3D T2-FLAIR, 3D T2-weighted, post-single-dose gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequences, and a DWI sequence. The progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy surveillance protocol includes FLAIR and DWI sequences only. The spinal cord MR imaging protocol includes sagittal T1-weighted and proton attenuation, STIR or phase-sensitive inversion recovery, axial T2- or T2*-weighted imaging through suspicious lesions, and, in some cases, postcontrast gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. The clinical question being addressed should be provided in the requisition for the MR imaging. The radiology report should be descriptive, with results referenced to previous studies. MR imaging studies should be permanently retained and available. The current revision incorporates new clinical information and imaging techniques that have become more available.

Canadian Expert Panel Recommendations for MRI Use in MS Diagnosis and Monitoring

BACKGROUND

A definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), as distinct from a clinically isolated syndrome, requires one of two conditions: a second clinical attack or particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings as defined by the McDonald criteria. MRI is also important after a diagnosis is made as a means of monitoring subclinical disease activity. While a standardized protocol for diagnostic and follow-up MRI has been developed by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres, acceptance and implementation in Canada have been suboptimal.

METHODS

To improve diagnosis, monitoring, and management of a clinically isolated syndrome and MS, a Canadian expert panel created consensus recommendations about the appropriate application of the 2010 McDonald criteria in routine practice, strategies to improve adherence to the standardized Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres MRI protocol, and methods for ensuring effective communication among health care practitioners, in particular referring physicians, neurologists, and radiologists.

RESULTS

This article presents eight consensus statements developed by the expert panel, along with the rationale underlying the recommendations and commentaries on how to prioritize resource use within the Canadian healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

The expert panel calls on neurologists and radiologists in Canada to incorporate the McDonald criteria, the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres MRI protocol, and other guidance given in this consensus presentation into their practices. By improving communication and general awareness of best practices for MRI use in MS diagnosis and monitoring, we can improve patient care across Canada by providing timely diagnosis, informed management decisions, and better continuity of care.

The clinical course of multiple sclerosis

Knowledge of the epidemiology and natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential for practitioners and patients to make informed decisions about their care. This knowledge, in turn, depends upon the findings from reliable studies (i.e., those which adhere to the highest methodological standards). For a clinically variable disease such as MS, these standards include case ascertainment using a population-based design; a large-sized sample of patients, who are followed for a long time-period in order to provide adequate statistical power; a regular assessment of patients that is prospective, frequent, and standardized; and the application of rigorous statistical techniques, taking into account confounding factors such as the use of disease modifying therapy or the age at clinical onset. In this chapter we review the available epidemiologic and natural history data as it relates clinical issues such as the likelihood of incomplete recovery from a first attack; the likelihood and time course of a second attack; the likelihood and time course of disease progression and the accumulation of irreversible disability; the disease prognosis based both upon the clinical nature and presentation of the first episode and upon the initial disease course; and the impact of disease on mortality. In addition, these studies provide insight to the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the course and prognosis of MS. Studies of the Lyon cohort have been particularly helpful in this regard and observations from this cohort have led to the hypothesis that, in large part, the accumulation of disability in MS is an age-related process, which is independent of the clinical subtype of MS (i.e., relapsing-remitting, primary progressive, secondary progressive, or relapsing progressive). And finally, we consider briefly the impact of various life events (e.g., pregnancy, infection, vaccination, trauma, and stress) on the clinical course of disease.

Early MRI activity predicts treatment nonresponse with intramuscular interferon beta-1a in clinically isolated syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether MRI activity 6 months after treatment initiation in the Controlled High-Risk Subjects Avonex® Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study (CHAMPS) predicted progression to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) over the subsequent 30 months in intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a)-treated patients vs placebo-treated patients.

METHODS

CHAMPS patients were randomized to once-weekly IM IFNβ-1a 30 μg or placebo for up to 36 months. MRI was performed every 6 months until CDMS confirmation. Patient groups were defined based on new T2 and/or Gd+ lesions at 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen IM IFNβ-1a patients (6.7%) and 24 placebo patients (12.6%) developed CDMS prior to month 6 and did not undergo the 6-month MRI. At 6 months, 29.7% of IM IFNβ-1a-treated patients vs 40.9% of placebo-treated patients were defined as having high MRI activity levels (≥2 new T2 and/or ≥2 Gd+ lesions). In this subgroup, estimated cumulative probabilities of CDMS were similar between groups (HR=0.88 [0.44-1.77], p=0.7227). A significant treatment response was seen for patients with <2 new T2 and <2 Gd+ lesions at 6 months (HR=0.39 [0.19-0.82], p=0.0120).

CONCLUSION

MRI scans 6 months after IM IFNβ-1a initiation in CIS patients predict early treatment non-response. Standardized scanning and monitoring may facilitate early disease management.

Efficacy of subcutaneous interferon β-1a on MRI outcomes in a randomised controlled trial of patients with clinically isolated syndromes

AIM

The REbif FLEXible dosing in early MS (REFLEX) study compared several brain MRI outcomes in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis and treated with two dose-frequencies of subcutaneous interferon (IFN) β-1a or placebo.

METHODS

Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to IFN β-1a, 44 µg subcutaneously three times a week or once a week, or placebo three times a week for up to 24 months. MRI scans were performed every 3 months, or every 6 months if the patient developed clinically definite multiple sclerosis. End points analysed included: number of combined unique active lesions per patient per scan; numbers and volumes of new T2, T1 hypointense and gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions per patient per scan; and brain volume.

RESULTS

517 patients were randomised (intent-to-treat population: subcutaneous IFN β-1a three times a week, n=171; subcutaneous IFN β-1a once a week, n=175; placebo, n=171). Combined unique active lesions were lower in patients treated with subcutaneous IFN β-1a versus placebo (mean (SD) lesions per patient per scan: three times a week 0.6 (1.15); once a week 1.23 (4.26); placebo 2.70 (5.23); reduction versus placebo: three times a week 81%; once a week 63%; p<0.001) and with three times a week versus once a week (48% reduction; p=0.002). The mean numbers of new T2, T1 hypointense and Gd+ lesions were all significantly lower in the two active treatment arms compared with placebo (p≤0.004 for three times a week or once a week) and in the three times a week group compared with once a week (p≤0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Both subcutaneous IFN β-1a 44 µg regimens improved MRI outcomes versus placebo, with the three times a week regimen having a more pronounced effect than once a week dosing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov identifier, NCT00404352.

Patient subgroup analyses of the treatment effect of subcutaneous interferon β-1a on development of multiple sclerosis in the randomized controlled REFLEX study

The REFLEX study (NCT00404352) established that subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) β-1a reduced the risks of McDonald MS (2005 criteria) and clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event suggestive of MS. The aim of this subgroup analysis was to assess the treatment effect of sc IFN β-1a in patient subgroups defined by baseline disease and demographic characteristics (age, sex, use of steroids at the first event, classification of first event as mono- or multifocal, presence/absence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, count of <9 or ≥9 T2 lesions), and by diagnosis of MS using the revised McDonald 2010 MS criteria. Patients were randomized to the serum-free formulation of IFN β-1a, 44 μg sc three times weekly or once weekly, or placebo, for 24 months or until diagnosis of CDMS. Treatment effects of sc IFN β-1a on McDonald 2005 MS and CDMS in the predefined subgroups were similar to effects found in the intent-to-treat population. McDonald 2010 MS was retrospectively diagnosed in 37.7 % of patients at baseline. Both regimens of sc IFN β-1a significantly reduced the risk versus placebo of McDonald 2005 MS and CDMS, irrespective of McDonald 2010 status at baseline (risk reductions between 29 and 51 %). The effect of sc IFN β-1a was not substantially influenced by baseline patient demographic and disease characteristics, or baseline presence/absence of McDonald 2010 MS.

[Sema4A as a biomarker predicting responsiveness to IFN β treatment]

Approximately one-third of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibit markedly high-level-expression of Sema4A. The expression of Sema4A is increased on DCs in MS patients and shed from these cells in a metalloproteinase-dependent manner. DC-derived Sema4A is critical for Th17 cell differentiation, and MS patients with high Sema4A levels exhibit Th17 skewing. Furthermore, patients with high Sema4A levels have more severe disabilities and are unresponsive to IFN-β treatment. We investigated whether recombinant Sema4A abrogates the efficacy of IFN-β in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of MS. Administration of Sema4A concurrently with IFN-β abrogated the efficacy of IFN-β. These effects of Sema4A were attributed to promote Th1 and Th17 differentiation and to increase adhesive activation of T cells to endothelial cells, even in the presence of IFN-β.Thus unresponsiveness to IFN-β treatment of MS patients with high Sema4A was also confirmed by model mice EAE. We recommend assaying Sema4A first, and then selecting DMD other than IFN-β for patients with high Sema4A.

Novel immunomodulatory approaches for the management of multiple sclerosis

We provide a focused review of novel immunomodulatory approaches for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, the most common acquired inflammatory demyelinating disease of humans. The requirement for such a review was stimulated by the emerging application of novel oral medications and the need for the practicing physician to place these within the treatment paradigm. We provide a conceptual diagram of our current view of the pathogenesis of demyelination and remyelination in this disorder. In addition, we include a working template on how to use a tier 1 and tier 2 approach to medications as the disease worsens in the individual. We emphasize the approach of treatment based on "individualized medicine," tailored to the specific needs of each patient. In the future, we envision new drugs to enhance remyelination and protect neurons and axons from death in order to promote central nervous system regeneration and repair.

Association of multiple sclerosis susceptibility variants and early attack location in the CNS

OBJECTIVE

The anatomic location of subsequent relapses in early multiple sclerosis (MS) appears to be predicted by the first attack location. We sought to determine if genetic polymorphisms associated with MS susceptibility are associated with attack location.

METHODS

17 genome-wide association study-identified MS susceptibility polymorphisms were genotyped in 503 white, non-Hispanic patients seen within a year of MS onset. Their association with the CNS location of the first two MS attacks was assessed in multivariate repeated measures analyses (generalized estimating equations with robust standard errors).

RESULTS

The IL12A polymorphism was independently associated with increased odds of attacks involving the spinal cord (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.11, 2.07, p = 0.009), as was the IRF8 polymorphism (OR = 2.40, 95% CI [1.04, 5.50], p = 0.040). The IL7R polymorphism was associated with reduced odds of attacks involving the brainstem/cerebellum (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22, 0.97, p = 0.041), as were the TNFRSF1A and IL12A polymorphisms. The CD6 polymorphism conferred reduced odds of optic neuritis as an attack location (OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.49, 0.97], p = 0.034). Several other genes showed trends for association with attack location.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the MS susceptibility genes may be associated with MS attack location. The IL12A polymorphism is of particular interest given that interferon beta therapy appears to influence IL12 levels. These findings may lead to improved understanding of MS pathogenesis and treatment.

Risk of multiple sclerosis after optic neuritis in patients with normal baseline brain MRI

When assessing and managing a patient with optic neuritis (ON), the risk of future development of multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important issue, as this can be the first presentation of the disease. Although the presence of lesions on baseline brain MRI is the strongest predictor of MS conversion, some patients with normal imaging also develop MS. We aimed to estimate MS risk in patients with ON and a normal baseline MRI and identify individuals with higher risk of conversion. We performed a retrospective study including patients with idiopathic ON and normal baseline brain MRI who presented to our hospital over an 8 year period. Of a total of 42 patients, 10 converted to MS: five during the first follow-up year, seven during the first 2 years and all of the patients within the first 5 years, with a 5 year MS conversion rate of 23.8%. MS conversion rates were significantly higher in patients with history of previous symptoms suggestive of demyelination (p=0.002), cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands unmatched in serum (p=0.004) and incomplete visual acuity recovery (≤6/12) after 1 year (p=0.002). Lower conversion rates were found in patients with optic disc edema (p=0.022). According to these results, a significant proportion of patients with idiopathic ON and a normal baseline brain MRI will develop MS, with a higher risk during the first 5 years. Therefore, in the presence of factors in favor of MS conversion, close follow-up, including semestral medical consultations and yearly brain MRI, can be recommended. Early immunomodulatory treatment may be individually considered as it can delay conversion and reduce new lesion development rate.

Clinical testing for neutralizing antibodies to interferon-β in multiple sclerosis

Biopharmaceuticals are drugs which are based on naturally occurring proteins (antibodies, receptors, cytokines, enzymes, toxins), nucleic acids (DNA, RNA) or attenuated microorganisms. Immunogenicity of these agents has been commonly described and refers to a specific antidrug antibody response. Such immunogenicity represents a major factor impairing the efficacy of biopharmaceuticals due to biopharmaceutical neutralization. Indeed, clinical experience has shown that induction of antidrug antibodies is associated with a loss of response to biopharmaceuticals and also with hypersensitivity reactions. The first disease-specific agent licensed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) was interferon-β (IFNβ). In its various preparations, it remains the most commonly used first-line agent. The occurrence of antidrug antibodies has been extensively researched in MS, particularly in relation to IFNβ. However, much controversy remains regarding the significance of these antibodies and incorporation of testing into clinical practice. Between 2% and 45% of people treated with IFNβ will develop neutralizing antibodies, and this is dependent on the specific drug and dosing regimen. The aim of this review is to discuss the use of IFNβ in MS, the biological and clinical relevance of anti-IFNβ antibodies (binding and neutralizing antibodies), the incorporation of testing in clinical practice and ongoing research in the field.

Interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy

Interferon beta and glatiramer acetate have been mainstays of treatment in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis for two decades. Remarkable advances in our understanding of immune function and dysfunction as well as increasingly sophisticated clinical trial design have stemmed from efforts to better understand these drugs. In this chapter, we review the history of their development and elaborate on known and theorized mechanisms of action. We describe the pivotal clinical trials that have led to their widespread use. We evaluate the clinical use of the drugs including tolerability, side effects, and efficacy measures. Finally, we look to the future of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the context of an ever growing armamentarium of treatments for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Shifting imaging targets in multiple sclerosis: from inflammation to neurodegeneration

Classically multiple sclerosis (MS) has been regarded as an auto-immune disease of the white matter in the central nervous system leading to severe disability over the course of several decades. Current therapeutic strategies in MS are mostly based on either immune suppression or immune modulation. Although effective in decreasing relapse frequency and severity as well as delaying disease progression, MS pathology ensues nonetheless. In the last decade it became evident that gray matter pathology plays an important role in disease progression and helps explaining certain aspects of MS-related disability such as cognitive decline. Conventional MRI outcome measures commonly used in clinical trials are sufficient to demonstrate an anti-inflammatory drug-effect but lack pathological specificity and are poor to moderate predictors of disability. In this article, we review new insights in gray matter pathology and functional reorganization in MS and how these novel fields in MS research may validate and establish new MRI outcome measures, aid in the development of new therapeutic strategies for neuroprotection and neurorepair, and may lead to development of novel predictive measures of disability and disease progression in MS.

Approved Beta interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: is there an odd one out?

Three interferons are marketed for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In its pivotal trial, one of them demonstrated impressive efficacy as a once-weekly regimen, but later head-to-head studies and reviews questioned its superiority. Analysis of this pivotal trial in publications and health authority reviews has shown that its early termination might have caused attrition bias. Censored patients were different from those completing the study on magnetic resonance imaging parameters and benefited from placebo in terms of relapse rate. Early progression of disability and differences in follow-up duration could have favored the benefit observed for the progression of disability outcome. Only the raw data could be of help to confirm or refute doubts about this trial. Raw data should be made available to the scientific community.

Early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

About half of multiple sclerosis patients present with optic neuritis (ON) as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial study, 28% of patients with ON and an abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) did not have a relapse at the end of 15 years. It is still difficult to predict which CIS patients will go on to develop clinically definite multiple sclerosis and which will have a benign course.

REVIEW SUMMARY

This review focuses on more advanced methods of detecting and quantifying ON in multiple sclerosis that have been developed in the past 15 years, especially on recent developments in optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer and its role in monitoring axonal loss in the course of the disease. New clinical trial methods of measuring visual acuity include high-contrast visual acuity testing with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts, low-contrast letter acuity, and contrast sensitivity testing. More advanced neuroimaging techniques include magnetization transfer imaging and diffusion tensor imaging to quantify visual pathway lesions. Other tests of visual function, such as multifocal visual-evoked potentials and functional MRI, have been shown to be more sensitive than conventional visual-evoked potentials or MRI in detecting early, subtle visual impairment in ON and early recovery of visual function related to cortical plasticity. Newer agents are currently being investigated for CIS in ongoing clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Better methods are being developed for the earlier diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of ON. In the future, CIS patients may be stratified according to their risk of development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis and therefore, receive the appropriate treatment.

Neurologic emergencies: case studies

During the past 2 decades, the world has witnessed a significant improvement in the understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of neurologic diseases, which presents emergencies. Every day neurologists are consulted for patients who present with neurologic emergencies to the emergency departments. In this article, we present a series of case reports about patients with acute neurologic and psychiatric problems and discuss their management briefly.

Memory B cells from a subset of treatment-naïve relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients elicit CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

Recent evidence suggests that B- and T-cell interactions may be paramount in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) disease pathogenesis. We hypothesized that memory B-cell pools from RRMS patients may specifically harbor a subset of potent neuro-APC that support neuro-Ag reactive T-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. To test this hypothesis, we compared CD80 and HLA-DR expression, IL-10 and lymphotoxin-α secretion, neuro-Ag binding capacity, and neuro-Ag presentation by memory B cells from RRMS patients to naïve B cells from RRMS patients and to memory and naïve B cells from healthy donors (HD). We identified memory B cells from some RRMS patients that elicited CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Notwithstanding the fact that the phenotypic parameters that promote efficient Ag presentation were observed to be similar between RRMS and HD memory B cells, a corresponding capability to elicit CD4(+) T-cell proliferation in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein was not observed in HD memory B cells. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the memory B-cell pool in RRMS harbors neuro-Ag specific B cells that can activate T cells.

Eye disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: natural history and management

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and leading cause of disability in young adults. Vision impairment is a common component of disability for this population of patients. Injury to the optic nerve, brainstem, and cerebellum leads to characteristic syndromes affecting both the afferent and efferent visual pathways. The objective of this review is to summarize the spectrum of eye disorders in patients with MS, their natural history, and current strategies for diagnosis and management. We emphasize the most common disorders including optic neuritis and internuclear ophthalmoparesis and include new techniques, such as optical coherence tomography, which promise to better our understanding of MS and its effects on the visual system.

Predictive factors for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated spinal cord syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of conversion to definite multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients with a cord clinically isolated syndrome.

METHODS

The predictive values for conversion to MS of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) variables in 114 patients with acute partial myelitis confirmed by a spinal cord lesion on MRI were studied. Other causes of cord syndromes were excluded.

RESULTS

MS was diagnosed in 78 patients (86%) during 4.0 ± 1.9 years of follow-up. Some 67 of these patients had a second clinical episode. The diagnosis of isolated myelitis was maintained for 36 patients, 78% of whom (28 cases) were followed for at least 2 years, comparable to the MS patients. Age, bladder involvement, ≥ 2 cord lesions on MRI, ≥ 9 brain lesions, ≥ 3 periventricular lesions and intrathecal IgG synthesis predicted conversion to clinically definite MS. Multivariate logistic analysis identified three predictors of MS diagnosis: age ≤ 40 years, inflammatory CSF and ≥ 3 periventricular lesions on brain MRI.

CONCLUSION

Two out of three baseline factors (age, periventricular lesions and inflammatory CSF) predicted conversion to MS with better accuracy than the revised McDonald criteria for dissemination in space.

New developments in the treatment of optic neuritis

Acute optic neuritis (ON) has various etiologies. The most common presentation is inflammatory, demyelinating, idiopathic, or "typical" ON, which may be associated with multiple sclerosis. This must be differentiated from "atypical" causes of ON, which differ in their clinical presentation, natural history, management, and prognosis. Clinical "red flags" for an atypical cause of ON include absent or persistent pain, exudates and hemorrhages on fundoscopy, very severe, bilateral, or progressive visual loss, and failure to recover. In typical ON, steroids shorten the duration of the attack, but do not influence visual outcome. This is in contrast to atypical ON associated with conditions such as sarcoidosis and neuromyelitis optica, which require aggressive immunosuppression and sometimes plasma exchange. The visual prognosis of typical ON is generally good. The prognosis in atypical ON is more variable. New developments aimed at designing better treatments for patients who fail to recover are discussed, focusing on recent research elucidating mechanisms of damage and recovery in ON. Future therapeutic directions may include enhancing repair processes, such as remyelination or adaptive neuroplasticity, or alternative methods of immunomodulation. Pilot studies investigating the safety and proof-of-principle of stem cell treatment are currently underway.

Cognitive impairment in clinically isolated syndrome: A systematic review

The pattern of cognitive abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been extensively studied and well characterized. However, little is known about the cognitive involvement in patients with the clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Early treatment of multiple sclerosis: a Latin American experts meeting

Patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) by definition do not have multiple sclerosis (MS) but are at risk of developing it. While studies show earlier immunomodulating drug use is effective, treatment must consider likely patient prognosis. In this paper we review current diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment literature for patients with CIS within Latin American clinical settings. Latin American MS experts, convened by ACINDES (The Civil Association for Research and Development in Health), reviewed current CIS (and early MS) literature and drew consensus conclusions. Three subgroups addressed separate questionnaires on CIS issues: prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment. MRI can contribute to predicting MS risk in patients with CIS; in Latin America, investigation of haplotype presence associated with CIS would be appropriate. McDonald's criteria and subsequent revisions enable earlier, more accurate MS diagnosis. Type A evidence exists supporting all leading immunomodulating MS drugs for effective treatment of CIS with a high risk of conversion to MS. In conclusion, patients with CIS are usually young, with often-limited symptomatic manifestations, and must be adequately prepared to receive preventive treatment. This consensus review should contribute to the dialogue between physicians and patients.

Early MRI in optic neuritis: the risk for clinically definite multiple sclerosis

MRI brain lesions at presentation with optic neuritis (ON) increase the risk for developing clinically definite (CD) multiple sclerosis (MS). More detailed early MRI findings may improve prediction of conversion.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of number, location and activity of lesions at presentation, new lesions at early follow-up and non-lesion MRI measures on conversion from optic neuritis (ON) to CDMS.

142/143 ON patients, prospectively recruited into a serial MRI and clinical follow-up study, were followed-up at least once. Cox regression analysis determined independent early MRI predictors of time to CDMS from: (i) baseline lesion number, location and activity measures, (ii) three-month lesion activity measures and (iii) brain atrophy, magnetization transfer ratio and spectroscopy measures.

114/142 (80%) had abnormal baseline brain or cord MRI. 57 (40%) developed CDMS (median of 16 months from clinically isolated syndrome onset). Median follow-up of the non-converters was 62 months. Multivariate analysis of baseline parameters revealed gender, periventricular and gadolinium-enhancing lesions as independent predictors of CDMS. Considering both scans together, gender, baseline periventricular and new T2 lesions at follow-up remained significant (hazard ratios 2.1, 2.4 and 4.9, respectively). No non-conventional measure predicted CDMS.

It was concluded that new T2 lesions on an early follow-up scan were the strongest independent predictor of CDMS.

Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate, approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, reduces relapses and disease activity and burden monitored by MRI. We assessed the efficacy of early treatment with glatiramer acetate in delaying onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind trial, undertaken in 80 sites in 16 countries, 481 patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome with unifocal manifestation, and two or more T2-weighted brain lesions measuring 6 mm or more, were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg per day (n=243) or placebo (n=238) for up to 36 months, unless they converted to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. The randomisation scheme used SAS-based blocks stratified by centre, and patients and all personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, based on a second clinical attack. Analysis was by intention to treat. A preplanned interim analysis was done for data accumulated from 81% of the 3-year study exposure. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00666224.

FINDINGS

All randomly assigned participants were analysed for the primary outcome. Glatiramer acetate reduced the risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis by 45% compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.77; p=0.0005). The time for 25% of patients to convert to clinically definite disease was prolonged by 115%, from 336 days for placebo to 722 days for glatiramer acetate. The most common adverse events in the glatiramer acetate group were injection-site reactions (135 [56%] glatiramer acetate vs 56 [24%] placebo) and immediate post-injection reactions (47 [19%] vs 12 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Early treatment with glatiramer acetate is efficacious in delaying conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndrome and brain lesions detected by MRI.

FUNDING

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Israel.

The effect of interferon beta-1a on optic neuritis relapse in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical effect of interferon beta-1a on optic neuritis (ON) relapse in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Taiwan.

METHODS

Data were collected from 23 MS patients with ON at National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1, 1993 and February 1, 2007. Twenty-three MS patients with ON received interferon beta-1a (Rebif) 44 microg via subcutaneous injection three times weekly. All patients received corticosteroids pulse therapy followed by oral prednisolone for acute ON. The annual relapse rate (ARR) of ON in these MS patients before and after the use of interferon beta-1a (Rebif) was the main clinical parameter of outcome in this study.

RESULTS

The ARR of ON was lower in the posttreatment period than in the pretreatment period (P = 0.0068). Thirteen patients (56.5%) had improved final visual acuity (>2 lines), and the other ten patients (43.5%) had stable final visual outcome (-2 lines < X < 2 lines). In addition, no recurrence of ON was noted in 15 patients (65.2%) during the posttreatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of interferon beta-1a 44 microg via subcutaneous injection three times weekly did not increase the ON attacks in MS patients receiving this treatment. In addition, beneficial effects were found with the use of interferon beta-1a on these patients.

Current approaches to the identification and management of breakthrough disease in patients with multiple sclerosis

Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are only partly effective -- breakthrough disease commonly occurs despite treatment. Breakthrough disease is predictive of continued disease activity and a poor prognosis. Availability of several DMDs offers the possibility of tailoring treatment to individual patients with RRMS and altering treatment in patients with breakthrough disease. However, no biological or imaging markers have been validated to guide initial treatment, markers of individual responsiveness to DMDs are scarce, and there is no class 1 evidence to guide alternative therapy in patients with breakthrough disease. In this Review, we discuss proposed strategies to monitor patients with RRMS being treated with DMDs, outline approaches to identifying therapeutic response in individual patients, review MRI and biological markers of treatment response, and summarise the role of antibodies in biological therapies. We also outline possible strategies for the management of patients with breakthrough disease and highlight areas in which research is needed.

Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is regarded as a prototypic inflammatory autoimmune central nervous system disorder causing neurological disability in young adults. Recommended basic immunomodulatory therapies of MS are currently interferon beta and glatiramer acetate. Both have proven to be clinically and paraclinically effective and clinical evidence suggests that treatment should be initiated as early as possible. However, despite the fact that therapeutic options for MS have significantly been widened over the past decade there is still tremendous activity in the search for new treatment options for MS. One important development in the field is reflected by the substantial number of promising results for oral therapies. Various phase III clinical trials are currently being initiated or are already underway evaluating the efficacy of a variety of orally administered agents, including cladribine, teriflunomide, laquinimod, fingolimod and fumaric acid. It is hoped that these oral therapies for MS further broaden our armament for MS therapy.

Efficacy of intramuscular interferon beta-1a in patients with clinically isolated syndrome: analysis of subgroups based on new risk criteria

Approximately 85% of multiple sclerosis (MS) cases begin as clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). Results from the Controlled High-Risk Subjects Avonex® Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study (CHAMPS) demonstrated that, in patients with CIS, treatment with intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) 30 μg once weekly delayed conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS) in the total population and in subgroups based on presenting syndromes and baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. Changes to clinical and MRI risk classification of presenting symptoms in recent studies prompted reanalysis of CHAMPS data. Presenting syndromes were assessed using a derived algorithm that stratifies patients into mono- or multifocal categories based on functional system scores. The ability of IM IFNβ-1a to delay progression to CDMS in subgroups based on clinical presentation and MRI characteristics was assessed. Reanalysis of CHAMPS patients showed that 30% could be classified by clinical criteria as having multifocal disease at baseline. IM IFNβ-1a initiated at a first demyelinating attack delayed CDMS in monofocal patients ( P = 0.0013), patients with or without gadolinium-enhancing lesions ( P = 0.0007, P = 0.0405) and patients with at least nine T2 lesions at baseline ( P = 0.0044). These data confirm that IM IFNβ-1a delays conversion to CDMS in patients with CIS.

The clinical epidemiology of multiple sclerosis

A comprehensive knowledge of the natural course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis is of utmost importance for a physician to make it affordable in simple descriptive terms to a patient when personal and medical decisions are to be taken. It is still topical because the currently acknowledged disease-modifying agents only marginally alter the overall prognosis of the disease. It provides reference for evaluating the efficacy of a therapeutic intervention in clinical trials; clues for public health services, health insurance companies, and pharmaceutical industry in their respective activities; and insights into the pathophysiology and the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Precise, consistent, and reliable data from appropriate cohorts have become available and knowledge is fairly comprehensive.

Relapse management in multiple sclerosis

Relapses, exacerbations, and attacks are synonymous for new or worsened neurologic symptoms that are the hallmark of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Management of relapses is not always straightforward. The clinician must distinguish between true relapses, symptom fluctuation, and pseudo-relapses. Risks and benefits of treating a relapse must be considered. Once the decision to treat is made, most clinicians would pursue a course of corticosteroids. Consensus may end there, as there is no clear-cut "best" route of administration or dosing schedule. The patient presenting with their first relapse or clinically isolated syndrome may be at risk for the development of multiple sclerosis. Clinical presentation, CSF findings, and MRI may all give clues as to the risk for future demyelinating events.

The definition of non-responder to multiple sclerosis treatment: neuroimaging markers

MRI is the main paraclinical tool used both to diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS) and to evaluate the efficacy of experimental treatments in phase II and III clinical trials. In the latter context, a major issue is represented by the weak correlations found between clinical and MRI aspects in the case of established MS, which are particularly evident when individual patients are considered. As a consequence, the definition of response to MS treatment, when based upon MRI aspects, remains a challenging task. Although the use of MRI-derived quantities to define treatment options and strategies at an individual patient level is supported by recent evidence, only the integration of clinical and MRI data can be considered a reliable approach for the work-up of patients undergoing disease-modifying treatments.