Effect of epilepsy magnetic source imaging on intracranial electrode placement

The role of magnetoencephalography in preoperative localization and postoperative outcome prediction in patients with posterior cortical epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the value of magnetoencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of patients with posterior cortex epilepsy.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with posterior cortex epilepsy (PCE) and intact magnetoencephalography (MEG) images were reviewed from August 2019 to July 2022. MEG dipole clusters were classified into single clusters, multiple clusters, and scatter dipoles based on tightness criteria. The association of the surgical outcome with MEG dipole classifications was evaluated using Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Among the 39 cases, there were 24 cases of single clusters (61.5%), nine cases of multiple clusters (23.1%), and six cases of scattered dipoles (15.4%). Patients with single dipole clusters were more likely to become seizure-free. Among single dipole cluster cases (n = 24), complete MEG dipole resection yielded a more favorable surgical outcome than incomplete resection (83.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.007). Patients with concordant MRI and MEG findings achieved a significantly more favorable surgical outcome than discordant patients (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.044), especially in single dipole cluster patients (87.5% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.005).

SIGNIFICANCE

MEG can provide additional valuable information regarding surgical candidate selection, epileptogenic zone localization, electrode implantation schedule, and final surgical planning in patients with posterior cortex epilepsy.

Electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation in focal epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneous recording of electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) in the diagnosis of epilepsy syndrome, localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and decision-making regarding surgical treatment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate patients with focal epilepsy who underwent EEG-fMRI. Two evaluators assessed epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, and surgical candidacy and defined confidence levels. They assessed these clinical characteristics first without EEG-fMRI and then including EEG-fMRI to assess how the results of EEG-fMRI changed the evaluations. We also determined how the clinical evaluation was affected by the concordance level between the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and the presumed focus location, and by the confidence level of the BOLD response itself based on the t-value of the primary and secondary clusters.

RESULTS

Fifty-one scans from 48 patients were included. The BOLD map affected 66.7% of the evaluations by altering evaluation items (epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy) or their confidence levels. EEG-fMRI results increased the confidence levels of epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy in 47.1% of patients but reduced clinical confidence in these features in 11.8%. More specifically, the confidence levels increased for epilepsy syndrome in 28.5%, identification of presumed focus in 33.9%, and determination of surgical candidacy in 29.4%. The BOLD signal confidence level, whether high or low, did not influence these clinical factors.

SIGNIFICANCE

Previous studies have emphasized the utility of EEG-fMRI for the localization of the epileptogenic zone. This study demonstrated the potential of EEG-fMRI to influence clinical confidence when determining epilepsy syndrome, the presumed epileptic focus, and surgical candidacy.

Interictal magnetoencephalography abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome

Intracranial EEG is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone localization but requires a preconceived hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic tissue. This placement is guided by qualitative interpretations of seizure semiology, MRI, EEG and other imaging modalities, such as magnetoencephalography. Quantitative abnormality mapping using magnetoencephalography has recently been shown to have potential clinical value. We hypothesized that if quantifiable magnetoencephalography abnormalities were sampled by intracranial EEG, then patients' post-resection seizure outcome may be better. Thirty-two individuals with refractory neocortical epilepsy underwent magnetoencephalography and subsequent intracranial EEG recordings as part of presurgical evaluation. Eyes-closed resting-state interictal magnetoencephalography band power abnormality maps were derived from 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. Magnetoencephalography abnormality maps were compared to intracranial EEG electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of intracranial EEG electrode placement and cerebral magnetoencephalography abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue and subsequent resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by magnetoencephalography and intracranial EEG corresponded to surgical success. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a measure of effect size. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal magnetoencephalography findings-in individuals that were seizure-free postoperatively (T = 3.9, P = 0.001) but not in those who did not become seizure-free. The overlap between magnetoencephalography abnormalities and electrode placement distinguished surgical outcome groups moderately well (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest abnormalities as defined by magnetoencephalography and intracranial EEG separated surgical outcome groups well, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.71 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.74, respectively. A model incorporating all three features separated surgical outcome groups best (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the epileptogenic zone and help render individuals seizure-free postoperatively. We showed that data-driven abnormality maps derived from resting-state magnetoencephalography recordings demonstrate clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Additionally, our predictive model of postoperative seizure freedom, which leverages both magnetoencephalography and intracranial EEG recordings, could aid patient counselling of expected outcome.

Electromagnetic source imaging predicts surgical outcome in children with focal cortical dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electromagnetic source imaging (EMSI) in localizing spikes and predict surgical outcome in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) due to focal cortical dysplasia (FCD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed magnetoencephalography (MEG) and high-density (HD-EEG) data from 23 children with FCD-associated DRE who underwent intracranial EEG and surgery. We localized spikes using equivalent current dipole (ECD) fitting, dipole clustering, and dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) on EMSI, electric source imaging (ESI), and magnetic source imaging (MSI). We calculated the distance from the seizure onset zone (DSOZ) and resection (DRES). We estimated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden's index (J) to predict outcome.

RESULTS

EMSI presented shorter DSOZ (15.18 ± 9.06 mm) and DRES (8.56 ± 6.24 mm) compared to ESI (DSOZ: 25.04 ± 16.20 mm, p < 0.009; DRES: 18.88 ± 17.30 mm, p < 0.03) and MSI (DSOZ: 23.37 ± 8.98 mm, p < 0.03; DRES: 15.51 ± 10.11 mm, p < 0.02) for clustering in patients with good outcome. Clustering showed shorter DSOZ and DRES compared to ECD fitting and dSPM (p < 0.05). EMSI had higher performance as outcome predictor (J = 70.63%) compared to ESI (J = 41.27%) and MSI (J = 33.33%) for clustering.

CONCLUSIONS

EMSI provides superior localization and improved predictive performance than individual modalities.

SIGNIFICANCE

EMSI can help the surgical planning and facilitate the localization of epileptogenic foci.

An artificial intelligence-based pipeline for automated detection and localisation of epileptic sources from magnetoencephalography

Objective.Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful non-invasive diagnostic modality for presurgical epilepsy evaluation. However, the clinical utility of MEG mapping for localising epileptic foci is limited by its low efficiency, high labour requirements, and considerable interoperator variability. To address these obstacles, we proposed a novel artificial intelligence-based automated magnetic source imaging (AMSI) pipeline for automated detection and localisation of epileptic sources from MEG data.Approach.To expedite the analysis of clinical MEG data from patients with epilepsy and reduce human bias, we developed an autolabelling method, a deep-learning model based on convolutional neural networks and a hierarchical clustering method based on a perceptual hash algorithm, to enable the coregistration of MEG and magnetic resonance imaging, the detection and clustering of epileptic activity, and the localisation of epileptic sources in a highly automated manner. We tested the capability of the AMSI pipeline by assessing MEG data from 48 epilepsy patients.Main results.The AMSI pipeline was able to rapidly detect interictal epileptiform discharges with 93.31% ± 3.87% precision based on a 35-patient dataset (with sevenfold patientwise cross-validation) and robustly rendered accurate localisation of epileptic activity with a lobar concordance of 87.18% against interictal and ictal stereo-electroencephalography findings in a 13-patient dataset. We also showed that the AMSI pipeline accomplishes the necessary processes and delivers objective results within a much shorter time frame (∼12 min) than traditional manual processes (∼4 h).Significance.The AMSI pipeline promises to facilitate increased utilisation of MEG data in the clinical analysis of patients with epilepsy.

Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome

Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a preconceived hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic tissue. This placement is guided by qualitative interpretations of seizure semiology, MRI, EEG and other imaging modalities, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). Quantitative abnormality mapping using MEG has recently been shown to have potential clinical value. We hypothesised that if quantifiable MEG abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients' post-resection seizure outcome may be better. Thirty-two individuals with refractory neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and subsequent iEEG recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Eyes-closed resting-state interictal MEG band power abnormality maps were derived from 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. MEG abnormality maps were compared to iEEG electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of iEEG electrode placement and cerebral MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and subsequent resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG corresponded to surgical success. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal MEG findings - in individuals that were seizure-free post-operatively (T=3.9, p=0.003), but not in those who did not become seizure free. The overlap between MEG abnormalities and electrode placement distinguished surgical outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest abnormalities as defined by MEG and iEEG separated surgical outcome groups well, AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively. A model incorporating all three features separated surgical outcome groups best (AUC=0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render individuals seizure-free post-operatively. We showed that data-driven abnormality maps derived from resting-state MEG recordings demonstrate clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Additionally, our predictive model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG recordings, could aid patient counselling of expected outcome.

Clinical significance of ictal magnetoencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

The significance of ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) is not well appreciated. We evaluated the relationships between ictal MEG, MRI, intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG), surgery and postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients (46 cases) with ictal MEG who underwent epilepsy surgery was included. We examined the localization of each modality, surgical resection area and seizure freedom after surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (45.7%) out of 46 cases were seizure-free at more than 6 months follow-up. Median duration of postoperative follow-up was 16.5 months. The patients in whom ictal, interictal single equivalent current dipole (SECD) and MRI lesion localization were completely included in the resection had a higher chance of being seizure-free significantly (p < 0.05). Concordance between ictal and interictal SECD localizations was significantly associated with seizure-freedom. Concordance between MRI lesion and ictal SECD, concordance between ictal ICEEG and ictal and interictal SECD, as well as concordance between ictal ICEEG and MRI lesion were significantly associated with seizure freedom.

CONCLUSIONS

Ictal MEG can contribute useful information for delineating the resection area in epilepsy surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

Resection should include ictal, interictal SECDs and MRI lesion localization, when feasible. Concordant ictal and interictal SECDs on MEG can be a favorable predictor of seizure freedom.

Predictive value of magnetoencephalography in guiding the intracranial implant strategy for intractable epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a useful component of the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. Due to its high spatiotemporal resolution, MEG often provides additional information to the clinician when forming hypotheses about the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Because of the increasing utilization of stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG), MEG clusters are used to guide sEEG electrode targeting with increasing frequency. However, there are no predefined features of an MEG cluster that predict ictal activity. This study aims to determine which MEG cluster characteristics are predictive of the EZ.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed all patients who had an MEG study (2017-2021) and underwent subsequent sEEG evaluation. MEG dipoles and sEEG electrodes were reconstructed in the same coordinate space to calculate overlap among individual contacts on electrodes and MEG clusters. MEG cluster features-including number of dipoles, proximity, angle, density, magnitude, confidence parameters, and brain region-were used to predict ictal activity in sEEG. Logistic regression was used to identify important cluster features and to train a binary classifier to predict ictal activity.

RESULTS

Across 40 included patients, 196 electrodes (42.2%) sampled MEG clusters. Electrodes that sampled MEG clusters had higher rates of ictal and interictal activity than those that did not sample MEG clusters (ictal 68.4% vs 39.8%, p < 0.001; interictal 71.9% vs 44.6%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that the number of dipoles (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.14, t = 3.43) and confidence volume (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.86, t = -2.032) were predictive of ictal activity. This model was predictive of ictal activity with 77.3% accuracy (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 74%, C-statistic = 0.81). Using only the number of dipoles had a predictive accuracy of 75%, whereas a threshold between 14 and 17 dipoles in a cluster detected ictal activity with 75.9%-85.2% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG clusters with approximately 14 or more dipoles are strong predictors of ictal activity and may be useful in the preoperative planning of sEEG implantation.

Data-driven approach for the delineation of the irritative zone in epilepsy in MEG

The reliable identification of the irritative zone (IZ) is a prerequisite for the correct clinical evaluation of medically refractory patients affected by epilepsy. Given the complexity of MEG data, visual analysis of epileptiform neurophysiological activity is highly time consuming and might leave clinically relevant information undetected. We recorded and analyzed the interictal activity from seven patients affected by epilepsy (Vectorview Neuromag), who successfully underwent epilepsy surgery (Engel > = II). We visually marked and localized characteristic epileptiform activity (VIS). We implemented a two-stage pipeline for the detection of interictal spikes and the delineation of the IZ. First, we detected candidate events from peaky ICA components, and then clustered events around spatio-temporal patterns identified by convolutional sparse coding. We used the average of clustered events to create IZ maps computed at the amplitude peak (PEAK), and at the 50% of the peak ascending slope (SLOPE). We validated our approach by computing the distance of the estimated IZ (VIS, SLOPE and PEAK) from the border of the surgically resected area (RA). We identified 25 spatiotemporal patterns mimicking the underlying interictal activity (3.6 clusters/patient). Each cluster was populated on average by 22.1 [15.0–31.0] spikes. The predicted IZ maps had an average distance from the resection margin of 8.4 ± 9.3 mm for visual analysis, 12.0 ± 16.5 mm for SLOPE and 22.7 ±. 16.4 mm for PEAK. The consideration of the source spread at the ascending slope provided an IZ closer to RA and resembled the analysis of an expert observer. We validated here the performance of a data-driven approach for the automated detection of interictal spikes and delineation of the IZ. This computational framework provides the basis for reproducible and bias-free analysis of MEG recordings in epilepsy.

The Impact of Magnetoencephalography-Directed Stereo-Electroencephalography Depth Electrode Implantation on Seizure Control Outcome in Children

Introduction The use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing epileptic foci and directing surgical treatment of medically refractory epilepsy is well established in clinical practice; however, it has not yet been incorporated into the routine planning of stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) (SEEG) depth electrode trajectories during invasive intracranial evaluation for epileptic foci localization. In this study, we assess the impact of MEG-directed SEEG on seizure outcomes in a pediatric cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a single-institution cohort of pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery. The primary endpoint was the reduction in seizure burden as determined by dichotomized Engel scores (favorable outcome: Engel scores I and II; poor outcome: Engel scores III and IV). Results Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (24 males and 13 females). The median age at seizure onset was three years, the median age at surgery was 14.1 years, and the median follow-up length was 30.8 months. Concordance was noted in 7/10 (70%) patients who received MEG-directed SEEG. Good clinical outcomes were achieved in 70% of MEG-directed SEEG patients, compared to 59.4% in their counterparts; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.72). We noted no statistically significant association between sex, disease laterality, or age at surgery and good clinical outcomes. Conclusions Patients who underwent MEG-directed SEEG had favorable clinical outcomes, which demonstrated the practicability of this technique for determining SEEG electrode placement. Although no significant difference in clinical outcomes was obtained between the two groups, this may have been due to low statistical power. Future prospective, multi-institutional investigations to assess the benefit of MEG-directed SEEG are warranted.

Fully-Automated Spike Detection and Dipole Analysis of Epileptic MEG Using Deep Learning

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a useful tool for clinically evaluating the localization of interictal spikes. Neurophysiologists visually identify spikes from the MEG waveforms and estimate the equivalent current dipoles (ECD). However, presently, these analyses are manually performed by neurophysiologists and are time-consuming. Another problem is that spike identification from MEG waveforms largely depends on neurophysiologists' skills and experiences. These problems cause poor cost-effectiveness in clinical MEG examination. To overcome these problems, we fully automated spike identification and ECD estimation using a deep learning approach fully automated AI-based MEG interictal epileptiform discharge identification and ECD estimation (FAMED). We applied a semantic segmentation method, which is an image processing technique, to identify the appropriate times between spike onset and peak and to select appropriate sensors for ECD estimation. FAMED was trained and evaluated using clinical MEG data acquired from 375 patients. FAMED training was performed in two stages: in the first stage, a classification network was learned, and in the second stage, a segmentation network that extended the classification network was learned. The classification network had a mean AUC of 0.9868 (10-fold patient-wise cross-validation); the sensitivity and specificity were 0.7952 and 0.9971, respectively. The median distance between the ECDs estimated by the neurophysiologists and those using FAMED was 0.63 cm. Thus, the performance of FAMED is comparable to that of neurophysiologists, and it can contribute to the efficiency and consistency of MEG ECD analysis.

Limited utility of structural MRI to identify the epileptogenic zone in young children with tuberous sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The success of epilepsy surgery in children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) hinges on identification of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). We studied structural MRI markers of epileptogenic lesions in young children with TSC.

METHODS

We included 26 children with TSC who underwent epilepsy surgery before the age of 3 years at five sites, with 12 months or more follow-up. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to surgical outcome data, reviewed 10 candidate lesions on preoperative MRI for characteristics of the tuber (large affected area, calcification, cyst-like properties) and of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) features (cortical malformation, gray-white matter junction blurring, transmantle sign). They selected lesions suspect for the EZ based on structural MRI, and reselected after unblinding to seizure onset location on electroencephalography (EEG).

RESULTS

None of the tuber characteristics and FCD features were distinctive for the EZ, indicated by resected lesions in seizure-free children. With structural MRI alone, the EZ was identified out of 10 lesions in 31%, and with addition of EEG data, this increased to 48%. However, rates of identification of resected lesions in non-seizure-free children were similar. Across 251 lesions, interrater agreement was moderate for large size (κ = .60), and fair (κ = .24) for all other features.

CONCLUSIONS

In young children with TSC, the utility of structural MRI features is limited in the identification of the epileptogenic tuber, but improves when combined with EEG data.

Insular Magnetoencephalography Dipole Clusters in Patients With Refractory Focal Epilepsy

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of magnetoencephalography (MEG) dipole clusters in the insular region in patients with focal epilepsy, when present in conjunction with MEG dipole clusters in other regions of the brain is not known.

METHODS

All patients (adult and pediatric) with MEG dipole clusters involving the insula were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent any form of surgical intervention were included in the study. Data obtained included age, sex, seizure characteristics, MRI brain, EEG, MEG, intracranial EEG, type of intervention, and seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (12 adults and 12 pediatric) were included. Eight patients had one staged intervention and 16 had intracranial evaluation. Ten of 11 patients (91%) with insular coverage by stereotactic EEG had interictal insular spikes, and 5 of 11 patients (45%) had ictal onset from the insula. Combined Engel (I & II) outcomes were seen in five patients with resections/ablations involving the insula MEG dipole clusters as compared with eight patients where the insular MEG dipole clusters were not resected/ablated.

CONCLUSIONS

Insular MEG dipole clusters identified on surface MEG correlated with interictal spikes in intracranial stereotactic electrode contacts in the insula. The presence of insular MEG dipole clusters, however, does not definitively imply a primary insular onset epilepsy.

Localizing the Epileptogenic Zone with Novel Biomarkers

Several noninvasive methods, such as high-density EEG or magnetoencephalography, are currently used to delineate the epileptogenic zone (EZ) during the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). Yet, none of these methods can reliably identify the EZ by their own. In most cases a multimodal approach is needed. Challenging cases often require the implantation of intracranial electrodes, either through stereo-taxic EEG or electro-corticography. Recently, a growing body of literature introduces novel biomarkers of epilepsy that can be used for analyzing both invasive as well as noninvasive electrophysiological data. Some of these biomarkers are able to delineate the EZ with high precision, augment the presurgical evaluation, and predict the surgical outcome of patients with DRE undergoing surgery. However, the use of these epilepsy biomarkers in clinical practice is limited. Here, we summarize and discuss the latest technological advances in the presurgical neurophysiological evaluation of children with DRE with emphasis on electric and magnetic source imaging, high frequency oscillations, and functional connectivity.

Diagnostic added value of interictal magnetic source imaging in presurgical evaluation of persons with epilepsy: A prospective blinded study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery, information is sourced from various imaging modalities to accurately localize the epileptogenic zone. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a newer noninvasive technique for localization. However, there is limited literature to evaluate if MEG provides additional advantage over the conventional imaging modalities in clinical decision making. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic added value of MEG in decision making before epilepsy surgery.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study. Patients underwent 3 h of recording in a MEG scanner, and the resulting localizations were compared with other complimentary investigations. Added value of MEG (considered separately from high-density electroencephalography) was defined as the frequency of cases in which (i) the information provided by magnetic source imaging (MSI) avoided implantation of intracranial electrodes and the patient was directly cleared for surgery, and (ii) MSI indicated additional substrates for implantation of intracranial electrodes. Postoperative seizure freedom was used as the diagnostic reference by which to measure the localizing accuracy of MSI.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients underwent epilepsy surgery. MEG provided nonredundant information, which contributed to deciding the course of surgery in 33% of the patients, and prevented intracranial recordings in 19%. A total of 76% of the patients underwent surgical resection in sublobes concordant with MSI localization, and the diagnostic odds ratio for good (Engel I) outcome in these patients was 2.3 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 7.86; p = 0.183) after long-term follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic source imaging yields additional useful information which can significantly alter as well as improve the surgical strategy for persons with epilepsy.

Presurgical Evaluation of Epilepsy Using Resting-State MEG Functional Connectivity

Epilepsy is caused by abnormal electrical discharges (clinically identified by electrophysiological recording) in a specific part of the brain [originating in only one part of the brain, namely, the epileptogenic zone (EZ)]. Epilepsy is now defined as an archetypical hyperexcited neural network disorder. It can be investigated through the network analysis of interictal discharges, ictal discharges, and resting-state functional connectivity. Currently, there is an increasing interest in embedding resting-state connectivity analysis into the preoperative evaluation of epilepsy. Among the various neuroimaging technologies employed to achieve brain functional networks, magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the excellent temporal resolution is an ideal tool for estimating the resting-state connectivity between brain regions, which can reveal network abnormalities in epilepsy. What value does MEG resting-state functional connectivity offer for epileptic presurgical evaluation? Regarding this topic, this paper introduced the origin of MEG and the workflow of constructing source-space functional connectivity based on MEG signals. Resting-state functional connectivity abnormalities correlate with epileptogenic networks, which are defined by the brain regions involved in the production and propagation of epileptic activities. This paper reviewed the evidence of altered epileptic connectivity based on low- or high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and the evidence of the advantage of using simultaneous MEG and intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings. More importantly, this review highlighted that MEG-based resting-state functional connectivity has the potential to predict postsurgical outcomes. In conclusion, resting-state MEG functional connectivity has made a substantial progress toward serving as a candidate biomarker included in epileptic presurgical evaluations.

Comparative contribution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in pre-operative localization for epilepsy surgery: A prospective blinded study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value and accuracy of ictal SPECT and inter-ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the site for surgery in persons with drug resistant epilepsy.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study. Patients expected to undergo epilepsy surgery were enrolled consecutively and the localization results from different imaging modalities were discussed in an epilepsy surgery meet. Odds ratio of good outcome (Engel I) were calculated in patients who underwent surgery in concordance with MEG and SPECT findings. Post-surgical seizure freedom lasting at least 36 months or more was considered the gold standard for determining the diagnostic output of SPECT and MEG.

RESULTS

MEG and SPECT were performed in 101 and 57 patients respectively. In 45 patients SPECT could not be done due to delay in injection or technical factors. The accuracy of MEG and SPECT in localizing the epileptogenic zone was found to be 74.26 % and 78.57 % respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for Engel I surgical outcome was reported as 2.43 and 5.0 for MEG and SPECT respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for MEG in whom SPECT was non-informative was found to be 6.57 [95 % CI 1.1, 39.24], although it was not significantly associated with good surgical outcome. MEG was useful in indicating sites for SEEG implantation.

CONCLUSION

SPECT was found to be non-informative for most patients, but reported better diagnostic output than MEG. MEG may be a useful alternative for patients in whom SPECT cannot be done or was non-localizing.

The 10 Common Evidence-Supported Indications for MEG in Epilepsy Surgery: An Illustrated Compendium

Unfamiliarity with the indications for and benefits of magnetoencephalography (MEG) persists, even in the epilepsy community, and hinders its acceptance to clinical practice, despite the evidence. The wide treatment gap for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and immense underutilization of epilepsy surgery had similar effects. Thus, educating referring physicians (epileptologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons) both about the value of epilepsy surgery and about the potential benefits of MEG can achieve synergy and greatly improve the process of selecting surgical candidates. As a practical step toward a comprehensive educational process to benefit potential MEG users, current MEG referrers, and newcomers to MEG, the authors have elected to provide an illustrated guide to 10 everyday situations where MEG can help in the evaluation of people with drug-resistant epilepsy. They are as follows: (1) lacking or imprecise hypothesis regarding a seizure onset; (2) negative MRI with a mesial temporal onset suspected; (3) multiple lesions on MRI; (4) large lesion on MRI; (5) diagnostic or therapeutic reoperation; (6) ambiguous EEG findings suggestive of "bilateral" or "generalized" pattern; (7) intrasylvian onset suspected; (8) interhemispheric onset suspected; (9) insular onset suspected; and (10) negative (i.e., spikeless) EEG. Only their practical implementation and furtherance of personal and collective education will lead to the potentially impactful synergy of the two-MEG and epilepsy surgery. Thus, while fulfilling our mission as physicians, we must not forget that ignoring the wealth of evidence about the vast underutilization of epilepsy surgery - and about the usefulness and value of MEG in selecting surgical candidates - is far from benign neglect.

Evidence From Meta-Analysis Supports Ictal Magnetoencephalographic Source Imaging as an Accurate Method in Presurgery Evaluation of Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND.

Successful epilepsy surgery relies on localization and removal of the brain area responsible for initializing the seizures called the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Intracranial EEG (icEEG) is gold standard of this localization but has several limitations like invasiveness and limited covered area. A noninvasive method with accurate localization precision is therefore desirable. The aim of this article is to investigate the following hypotheses: (1) Ictal onset zone as localized by magnetic source imaging (iMSI) can reliably localize the EZ in focal epilepsy and (2) this localization is as good as that of icEEG.

METHODS.

Six original studies and a total of 59 unique patients were included in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS.

Sensitivity and specificity of iMSI based on surgery outcome were 77% (95% CI 60%-90%) and 75% (95% CI 53%-90%), respectively. Specificity of iMSI was statistically higher than that of icEEG. There was no significant difference between sensitivity of iMSI and icEEG.

CONCLUSION.

The meta-analysis supports that iMSI is an accurate method, achieving similar sensitivity and higher specificity than icEEG. However, at present the use of the method is limited by short recording times. A limitation that might be overcome in the future using technical advances.

Merging Magnetoencephalography into Epilepsy Presurgical Work-up Under the Framework of Multimodal Integration

Multimodal image integration is the procedure that puts together imaging data from multiple sources into the same space by a computerized registration process. This procedure is relevant to patients with difficult-to-localize epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation, who typically have many tests performed, including MR imaging, PET, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG). This article describes the methodology of such integration, focusing on integration of MEG. Also discussed is the clinical value of integration of MEG, in terms of planning of intracranial EEG implantation, interpretation of intracranial EEG data, planning of final resection, and addressing surgical failures.

Utility of magnetic source imaging in nonlesional focal epilepsy: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

For patients with nonlesional refractory focal epilepsy (NLRFE), localization of the epileptogenic zone may be more arduous than for other types of epilepsy and frequently requires information from multiple noninvasive presurgical modalities and intracranial EEG (icEEG). In this prospective, blinded study, the authors assessed the clinical added value of magnetic source imaging (MSI) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with NLRFE.

METHODS

This study prospectively included 57 consecutive patients with NLRFE who were considered for epilepsy surgery. All patients underwent noninvasive presurgical evaluation and then MSI. To determine the surgical plan, discussion of the results of the presurgical evaluation was first undertaken while discussion participants were blinded to the MSI results. MSI results were then presented. MSI influence on the initial management plan was assessed.

RESULTS

MSI results influenced patient management in 32 patients. MSI results led to the following changes in surgical strategy in 14 patients (25%): allowing direct surgery in 6 patients through facilitating the detection of subtle cortical dysplasia in 4 patients and providing additional concordant diagnostic information to other presurgical workup in another 2 patients; rejection of surgery in 3 patients originally deemed surgical candidates; change of plan from direct surgery to icEEG in 2 patients; and allowing icEEG in 3 patients deemed not surgical candidates. MSI results led to changed electrode locations and contact numbers in another 18 patients. Epilepsy surgery was performed in 26 patients influenced by MSI results and good surgical outcome was achieved in 21 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, blinded study showed that information provided by MSI allows more informed icEEG planning and surgical outcome in a significant percentage of patients with NLRFE and should be included in the presurgical workup in those patients.

Presurgical epilepsy evaluation and epilepsy surgery

With a prevalence of 0.8 to 1.2%, epilepsy represents one of the most frequent chronic neurological disorders; 30 to 40% of patients suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy (that is, seizures cannot be controlled adequately with antiepileptic drugs). Epilepsy surgery represents a valuable treatment option for 10 to 50% of these patients. Epilepsy surgery aims to control seizures by resection of the epileptogenic tissue while avoiding neuropsychological and other neurological deficits by sparing essential brain areas. The most common histopathological findings in epilepsy surgery specimens are hippocampal sclerosis in adults and focal cortical dysplasia in children. Whereas presurgical evaluations and surgeries in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis and benign tumors recently decreased in most centers, non-lesional patients, patients requiring intracranial recordings, and neocortical resections increased. Recent developments in neurophysiological techniques (high-density electroencephalography [EEG], magnetoencephalography, electrical and magnetic source imaging, EEG-functional magnetic resonance imaging [EEG-fMRI], and recording of pathological high-frequency oscillations), structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (ultra-high-field imaging at 7 Tesla, novel imaging acquisition protocols, and advanced image analysis [post-processing] techniques), functional imaging (positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography co-registered to MRI), and fMRI significantly improved non-invasive presurgical evaluation and have opened the option of epilepsy surgery to patients previously not considered surgical candidates. Technical improvements of resective surgery techniques facilitate successful and safe operations in highly delicate brain areas like the perisylvian area in operculoinsular epilepsy. Novel less-invasive surgical techniques include stereotactic radiosurgery, MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy, and stereotactic intracerebral EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation.

Assessment of the Utility of Ictal Magnetoencephalography in the Localization of the Epileptic Seizure Onset Zone

Importance

Literature on ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in clinical practice and the relationship to other modalities is limited because of the brevity of routine studies.

Objective

To investigate the utility and reliability of ictal MEG in the localization of the epileptogenic zone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective medical record review and prospective analysis of a novel ictal rhythm analysis method was conducted at a tertiary epilepsy center with a wide base of referrals for epilepsy surgery evaluation and included consecutive cases of patients who experienced epileptic seizures during routine MEG studies from March 2008 to February 2012. A total of 377 studies screened. Data were analyzed from November 2011 to October 2015.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Presurgical workup and interictal and ictal MEG data were reviewed. The localizing value of using extended-source localization of a narrow band identified visually at onset was analyzed.

Results

Of the 44 included patients, the mean (SD) age at the time of recording was 19.3 (14.9) years, and 25 (57%) were male. The mean duration of recording was 51.2 minutes. Seizures were provoked by known triggers in 3 patients and were spontaneous otherwise. Twenty-five patients (57%) had 1 seizure, 6 (14%) had 2, and 13 (30%) had 3 or more. Magnetoencephalography single equivalent current dipole analysis was possible in 29 patients (66%), of whom 8 (28%) had no clear interictal discharges. Sublobar concordance between ictal and interictal dipoles was seen in 18 of 21 patients (86%). Three patients (7%) showed clear ictal MEG patterns without electroencephalography changes. Ictal MEG dipoles correlated with the lobe of onset in 7 of 8 patients (88%) who underwent intracranial electroencephalography evaluations. Reasons for failure to identify ictal dipoles included diffuse or poor dipolar ictal patterns, no MEG changes, and movement artifact. Resection of areas containing a minimum-norm estimate of a narrow band at onset, not single equivalent current dipole, was associated with sustained seizure freedom.

Conclusions and Significance

Ictal MEG data can provide reliable localization, including in cases that are difficult to localize by other modalities. These findings support the use of extended-source localization for seizures recorded during MEG.

Evidence for the Role of Magnetic Source Imaging in the Presurgical Evaluation of Refractory Epilepsy Patients

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the field of epilepsy has multiple advantages; just like electroencephalography (EEG), MEG is able to measure the epilepsy specific information (i.e., the brain activity reflecting seizures and/or interictal epileptiform discharges) directly, non-invasively and with a very high temporal resolution (millisecond-range). In addition MEG has a unique sensitivity for tangential sources, resulting in a full picture of the brain activity when combined with EEG. It accurately allows to perform source imaging of focal epileptic activity and functional cortex and shows a specific high sensitivity for a source in the neocortex. In this paper the current evidence and practice for using magnetic source imaging of focal interictal and ictal epileptic activity during the presurgical evaluation of drug resistant patients is being reviewed.

Magnetoencephalography for epileptic focus localization in a series of 1000 cases

The aim of epilepsy surgery in patients with focal, pharmacoresistant epilepsies is to remove the complete epileptogenic zone to achieve long-term seizure freedom. In addition to a spectrum of diagnostic methods, magnetoencephalography focus localization is used for planning of epilepsy surgery. We present results from a retrospective observational cohort study of 1000 patients, evaluated using magnetoencephalography at the University Hospital Erlangen over the time span of 28 years. One thousand consecutive cases were included in the study, evaluated at the University Hospital Erlangen between 1990 and 2018. All patients underwent magnetoencephalography as part of clinical workup for epilepsy surgery. Of these, 405 underwent epilepsy surgery after magnetoencephalography, with postsurgical follow-ups of up to 20 years. Sensitivity for interictal epileptic activity was evaluated, in addition to concordance of localization with the consensus of presurgical workup on a lobar level. We evaluate magnetoencephalography characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery versus patients who did not proceed to surgery. In operated patients, resection of magnetoencephalography localizations were related to postsurgical seizure outcomes, including long-term results after several years. In comparison, association of lesionectomy with seizure outcomes was analysed. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for magnetoencephalography resection and lesionectomy. Sensitivity for interictal epileptic activity was 72% with significant differences between temporal and extra-temporal lobe epilepsy. Magnetoencephalography was concordant with the presurgical consensus in 51% and showed additional or more focal involvement in an additional 32%. Patients who proceeded to surgery showed a significantly higher percentage of monofocal magnetoencephalography results. Complete magnetoencephalography resection was associated with significantly higher chances to achieve seizure freedom in the short and long-term. Diagnostic accuracy was significant in temporal and extra-temporal lobe cases, but was significantly higher in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy (diagnostic odds ratios of 4.4 and 41.6). Odds ratios were also higher in non-lesional versus lesional cases (42.0 versus 6.2). The results show that magnetoencephalography provides non-redundant information, which significantly contributes to patient selection, focus localization and ultimately long-term seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery. Specifically in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy and non-lesional cases, magnetoencephalography provides excellent accuracy.

Diagnostic accuracy of interictal source imaging in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: A systematic review from the E-PILEPSY consortium

OBJECTIVE

Interictal high resolution (HR-) electric source imaging (ESI) and magnetic source imaging (MSI) are non-invasive tools to aid epileptogenic zone localization in epilepsy surgery candidates. We carried out a systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy and quality of evidence of these modalities.

METHODS

Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane database were searched on 13 February 2017. Diagnostic accuracy studies taking post-surgical seizure outcome as reference standard were selected. Quality appraisal was based on the QUADAS-2 framework.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included: eight MSI (n = 267), three HR-ESI (n = 127) studies. None was free from bias. This mostly involved: selection of operated patients only, interference of source imaging with surgical decision, and exclusion of indeterminate results. Summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 82% (95% CI: 75-88%) and 53% (95% CI: 37-68%) for overall source imaging, with no statistical difference between MSI and HR-ESI. Specificity is higher when partially concordant results were included as non-concordant (p < 0.05). Inclusion of indeterminate test results as non-concordant lowered sensitivity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Source imaging has a relatively high sensitivity but low specificity for identification of the epileptogenic zone.

SIGNIFICANCE

We need higher quality studies allowing unbiased test evaluation to determine the added value and diagnostic accuracy of source imaging in the presurgical workup of refractory focal epilepsy.

Assessing the localization accuracy and clinical utility of electric and magnetic source imaging in children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of conventional 21-channel EEG (conv-EEG), 72-channel high-density EEG (HD-EEG) and 306-channel MEG in localizing interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).

METHODS

Twenty-four children who underwent epilepsy surgery were studied. IEDs on conv-EEG, HD-EEG, MEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) were localized using equivalent current dipoles and dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM). We compared the localization error (E_Loc) with respect to the ground-truth Irritative Zone (IZ), defined by iEEG sources, between non-invasive modalities and the distance from resection (D_res) between good- (Engel 1) and poor-outcomes. For each patient, we estimated the resection percentage of IED sources and tested whether it predicted outcome.

RESULTS

MEG presented lower E_Loc than HD-EEG and conv-EEG. For all modalities, D_res was shorter in good-outcome than poor-outcome patients, but only the resection percentage of the ground-truth IZ and MEG-IZ predicted surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG localizes the IZ more accurately than conv-EEG and HD-EEG. MSI may help the presurgical evaluation in terms of patient's outcome prediction. The promising clinical value of ESI for both conv-EEG and HD-EEG prompts the use of higher-density EEG-systems to possibly achieve MEG performance.

SIGNIFICANCE

Localizing the IZ non-invasively with MSI/ESI facilitates presurgical evaluation and surgical prognosis assessment.

Electromagnetic source imaging in presurgical workup of patients with epilepsy: A prospective study

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of electromagnetic source imaging (EMSI) in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy.

Methods

We prospectively recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) simultaneously with EEG and performed EMSI, comprising electric source imaging, magnetic source imaging, and analysis of combined MEG-EEG datasets, using 2 different software packages. As reference standard for irritative zone (IZ) and seizure onset zone (SOZ), we used intracranial recordings and for localization accuracy, outcome 1 year after operation.

Results

We included 141 consecutive patients. EMSI showed localized epileptiform discharges in 94 patients (67%). Most of the epileptiform discharge clusters (72%) were identified by both modalities, 15% only by EEG, and 14% only by MEG. Agreement was substantial between inverse solutions and moderate between software packages. EMSI provided new information that changed the management plan in 34% of the patients, and these changes were useful in 80%. Depending on the method, EMSI had a concordance of 53% to 89% with IZ and 35% to 73% with SOZ. Localization accuracy of EMSI was between 44% and 57%, which was not significantly different from MRI (49%–76%) and PET (54%–85%). Combined EMSI achieved significantly higher odds ratio compared to electric source imaging and magnetic source imaging.

Conclusion

EMSI has accuracy similar to established imaging methods and provides clinically useful, new information in 34% of the patients.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class IV evidence that EMSI had a concordance of 53%–89% and 35%–73% (depending on analysis) for the localization of epileptic focus as compared with intracranial recordings—IZ and SOZ, respectively.

Magnetoencephalographic Recordings in Infants: A Retrospective Analysis of Seizure-Focus Yield and Postsurgical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is often incorporated into the presurgical work-up of children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. There is growing literature on its role in improving selection for epilepsy surgery, particularly when brain MRI is "non-lesional" or in patients with recurrence or intractable seizures after epilepsy surgery. There are, however, no reports on the extrapolation of its role in the presurgical decision-making process of infants.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of infants who underwent MEG over a 10-year period at our center for presurgical work-up. We reviewed medical records to ascertain seizure history, work-up procedures including brain MRI and scalp EEG, and in the case of surgery, intracranial recordings, operative notes, and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 31 infants (<2 years of age) who underwent MEG recordings. Despite EEG interictal readings showing patterns of generalized dysfunction in 80%, MEG was able to pinpoint the foci of epileptic activity in 45%. In the MRI-negative group, 44% had focal lateralized interictal spikes on MEG. The sensitivity of MEG to detect interictal epileptiform activity was 90%, and its ability to provide additional information was 28%. Among 18 infants who had surgery, 13 became seizure free at follow-up. The percentage of infants with a focal spike volume on MEG studies and a seizure-free outcome was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG recordings in infants were found to be as sensitive for identifying seizure focus as other age groups, also supplying additional information to the decision-making process and validating its role in the presurgical work-up of infants with intractable epilepsy.

Magnetoencephalographic Mapping of Epileptic Spike Population Using Distributed Source Analysis: Comparison With Intracranial Electroencephalographic Spikes

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates magnetoencephalographic (MEG) spike population as compared with intracranial electroencephalographic (IEEG) spikes using a quantitative method based on distributed source analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied eight patients with medically intractable epilepsy who had an MEG and subsequent IEEG monitoring. Fifty MEG spikes were analyzed in each patient using minimum norm estimate. For individual spikes, each vertex in the source space was considered activated when its source amplitude at the peak latency was higher than a threshold, which was set at 50% of the maximum amplitude over all vertices. We mapped the total count of activation at each vertex. We also analyzed 50 IEEG spikes in the same manner over the intracranial electrodes and created the activation count map. The location of the electrodes was obtained in the MEG source space by coregistering postimplantation computed tomography to MRI. We estimated the MEG- and IEEG-active regions associated with the spike populations using the vertices/electrodes with a count over 25.

RESULTS

The activation count maps of MEG spikes demonstrated the localization associated with the spike population by variable count values at each vertex. The MEG-active region overlapped with 65 to 85% of the IEEG-active region in our patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mapping the MEG spike population is valid for demonstrating the trend of spikes clustering in patients with epilepsy. In addition, comparison of MEG and IEEG spikes quantitatively may be informative for understanding their relationship.

Magnetoencephalography: Clinical and Research Practices

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiological technique that detects the magnetic fields associated with brain activity. Synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM), a MEG magnetic source imaging technique, can be used to construct both detailed maps of global brain activity as well as virtual electrode signals, which provide information that is similar to invasive electrode recordings. This innovative approach has demonstrated utility in both clinical and research settings. For individuals with epilepsy, MEG provides valuable, nonredundant information. MEG accurately localizes the irritative zone associated with interictal spikes, often detecting epileptiform activity other methods cannot, and may give localizing information when other methods fail. These capabilities potentially greatly increase the population eligible for epilepsy surgery and improve planning for those undergoing surgery. MEG methods can be readily adapted to research settings, allowing noninvasive assessment of whole brain neurophysiological activity, with a theoretical spatial range down to submillimeter voxels, and in both humans and nonhuman primates. The combination of clinical and research activities with MEG offers a unique opportunity to advance translational research from bench to bedside and back.

IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted together whenever possible. This manuscript covers the basic physical and physiological principles of MEG and discusses the main aspects of state-of-the-art MEG data analysis. We provide guidelines for best practices of patient preparation, stimulus presentation, MEG data collection and analysis, as well as for MEG interpretation in routine clinical examinations. In 2017, about 200 whole-scalp MEG devices were in operation worldwide, many of them located in clinical environments. Yet, the established clinical indications for MEG examinations remain few, mainly restricted to the diagnostics of epilepsy and to preoperative functional evaluation of neurosurgical patients. We are confident that the extensive ongoing basic MEG research indicates potential for the evaluation of neurological and psychiatric syndromes, developmental disorders, and the integrity of cortical brain networks after stroke. Basic and clinical research is, thus, paving way for new clinical applications to be identified by an increasing number of practitioners of MEG.

The impact of mapping interictal discharges using EEG-fMRI on the epilepsy presurgical clinical decision making process: A prospective study

PURPOSE

We set out to establish the clinical utility of EEG-correlated fMRI as part of the presurgical evaluation, by measuring prospectively its effects on the clinical decision.

METHODS

Patients with refractory extra-temporal focal epilepsy, referred for presurgical evaluation were recruited in a period of 18 months. The EEG-fMRI based localization was presented during a multi-disciplinary meeting after the team had defined the presumed RESULTS: Sixteen patients (six women), with a median age of 28 years, were recruited. Interpretable EEG-fMRI results were available in 13: interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) were recorded in eleven patients and seizures were recorded in two patients. In three patients, no epileptic activity was captured during EEG-fMRI acquisition and in two of those an IED topographic map correlation was performed (between EEG recorded inside the scanner and long-term video EEG monitoring). EEG-fMRI results presentation had no impact on the initial clinical decision in three patients (23%) of the thirteen and resulted in a modification of the initial surgical plan in ten patients (77%) of the thirteen finally presented in MDT; in eight patients the impact was on the planned placement of invasive electrodes and in two patients the EEG-fMRI led to additional non-invasive tests before proceeding further with surgery.

CONCLUSION

The study is a prospective observational cohort study specifically designed to assess the impact of EEG-fMRI on the clinical decision making process, suggesting a significant influence of EEG-fMRI on epilepsy surgery planning.

Coregistrating magnetic source and magnetic resonance imaging for epilepsy surgery in focal cortical dysplasia

Background

Epilepsy surgery for focal cortical dysplasia type II (FCD II) offers good chances for seizure freedom, but remains a challenge with respect to lesion detection, defining the epileptogenic zone and the optimal resection strategy. Integrating results from magnetic source imaging from magnetoencephalography (MEG) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including MRI postprocessing may be useful for optimizing these goals.

Methods

We here present data from 21 adult FCD II patients, investigated during a 10 year period and evaluated including magnetic source imaging. 16 patients had epilepsy surgery, i.e. histopathologically verified FCD II, and a long follow up. We present our analysis of epileptogenic zones including MEG in relation to structural data according to MRI data and relate these results to surgical outcomes.

Results

FCD II in our cohort was characterized by high MEG yield and localization accuracy and MEG showed impact on surgical success-rates. MEG source localizations were detected in 95.2% of patients and were as close as 12.3 ± 8,1 mm to the MRI-lesion. After a mean follow up of >3 years, we saw >80% Engel I outcomes, with more favourable outcomes when the MEG source was completely resected (Fishers exact test 0,033).

Conclusion

We argue for a high value of conducting a combined MEG-MRI approach in the presurgical workup and the resection strategy in patients with FCD II related epilepsy.

The clinical impact of integration of magnetoencephalography in the presurgical workup for refractory nonlesional epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

For patients with nonlesional refractory focal epilepsy (NLRFE), localization of the epileptogenic zone is more arduous, and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) (icEEG) is frequently required. Planning for icEEG is dependent on combined data from multiple noninvasive modalities. We report the negative impact of lack of integration of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the presurgical workup in NLRFE.

METHODS

Observational MEG case series involving 31 consecutive patients with NLRFE in an academic epilepsy center. For various reasons, MEG data were not analyzed in a timely manner to be included in the decision-making process. The presumed impact of MEG was assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Magnetoencephalography would have changed the initial management in 21/31 (68%) had MEG results been available by reducing the number of intracranial electrodes, modifying their position, allowing for direct surgery, canceling the intracranial study, or providing enough evidence to justify one. Good surgical outcome was achieved in 11 out of 17 patients who proceeded to epilepsy surgery. Nine out of eleven had MEG clusters corresponding to the resection area, and MEG findings would have allowed for direct surgery (avoiding icEEG) in 2/11. Six patients had poor outcome including three patients where MEG would have significantly changed the outcome by modifying the resection margin. Magnetoencephalography provided superior information in 3 patients where inadequate coverage precluded accurate mapping of the epileptogenic zone.

CONCLUSION

In this single center retrospective study, MEG would have changed patient management, icEEG planning, and surgical outcome in a significant percentage of patients with NLRFE and should be considered in the presurgical workup in those patients.

Magnetoencephalography in Preoperative Epileptic Foci Localization: Enlightenment from Cognitive Studies

Over 30% epileptic patients are refractory to medication, who are amenable to neurosurgical treatment. Non-invasive brain imaging technologies including video-electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are widely used in presurgical assessment of epileptic patients. This review mainly discussed the current development of clinical MEG imaging as a diagnose approach, and its correlations with the golden standard intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG). More importantly, this review discussed the possible applications of functional networks in preoperative epileptic foci localization in future studies.

Multimodal investigation of epileptic networks: The case of insular cortex epilepsy

The insula is a deep cortical structure sharing extensive synaptic connections with a variety of brain regions, including several frontal, temporal, and parietal structures. The identification of the insular connectivity network is obviously valuable for understanding a number of cognitive processes, but also for understanding epilepsy since insular seizures involve a number of remote brain regions. Ultimately, knowledge of the structure and causal relationships within the epileptic networks associated with insular cortex epilepsy can offer deeper insights into this relatively neglected type of epilepsy enabling the refining of the clinical approach in managing patients affected by it. In the present chapter, we first review the multimodal noninvasive tests performed during the presurgical evaluation of epileptic patients with drug refractory focal epilepsy, with particular emphasis on their value for the detection of insular cortex epilepsy. Second, we review the emerging multimodal investigation techniques in the field of epilepsy, that aim to (1) enhance the detection of insular cortex epilepsy and (2) unveil the architecture and causal relationships within epileptic networks. We summarize the results of these approaches with emphasis on the specific case of insular cortex epilepsy.

Analysis of ictal magnetoencephalography using gradient magnetic-field topography (GMFT) in patients with neocortical epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate the usefulness of gradient magnetic-field topography (GMFT) for analysis of ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with neocortical epilepsy.

METHODS

We identified 13 patients presenting with an ictal event during preoperative MEG. We applied equivalent current dipole (ECD) estimation and GMFT to detect and localize the ictal MEG onset, and compared these methods with the ictal onset zone (IOZ) derived from chronic intracranial electroencephalography. The surgical resection areas and outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

GMFT detected and localized the ictal MEG onset in all patients, whereas ECD estimation showed localized ECDs in only 2. The delineation of GMFT was concordant with the IOZ at the gyral-unit level in 10 of 12 patients (83.3%). The detectability and precision of delineation of ictal MEG activity by GMFT were significantly superior to those of ECD (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). Complete resection of the IOZ in the concordant group provided seizure freedom in 3 patients, whereas seizures remained in 9 patients who had incomplete resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its higher spatial resolution, GMFT of ictal MEG is superior to conventional ECD estimation in patients with neocortical epilepsy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ictal MEG study is a useful tool to estimate the seizure onset in patients with neocortical epilepsy.

Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study

In recent years, the use of source analysis based on electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) has gained considerable attention in presurgical epilepsy diagnosis. However, in many cases the source analysis alone is not used to tailor surgery unless the findings are confirmed by lesions, such as, e.g., cortical malformations in MRI. For many patients, the histology of tissue resected from MRI negative epilepsy shows small lesions, which indicates the need for more sensitive MR sequences. In this paper, we describe a technique to maximize the synergy between combined EEG/MEG (EMEG) source analysis and high resolution MRI. The procedure has three main steps: (1) construction of a detailed and calibrated finite element head model that considers the variation of individual skull conductivities and white matter anisotropy, (2) EMEG source analysis performed on averaged interictal epileptic discharges (IED), (3) high resolution (0.5 mm) zoomed MR imaging, limited to small areas centered at the EMEG source locations. The proposed new diagnosis procedure was then applied in a particularly challenging case of an epilepsy patient: EMEG analysis at the peak of the IED coincided with a right frontal focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), which had been detected at standard 1 mm resolution MRI. Of higher interest, zoomed MR imaging (applying parallel transmission, 'ZOOMit') guided by EMEG at the spike onset revealed a second, fairly subtle, FCD in the left fronto-central region. The evaluation revealed that this second FCD, which had not been detectable with standard 1 mm resolution, was the trigger of the seizures.