Immunosuppressive treatment in multifocal motor neuropathy

Update on therapy of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

Chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), are a group of disorders deemed to be caused by an immune response against peripheral nerve antigens. Several immune therapies have been reported to be variably effective in these neuropathies including steroids, plasma exchange, and high-dose intravenous (IVIg) or subcutaneous (SCIg) immunoglobulins. These therapies are however far from being invariably effective and may be associated with a number of side effects leading to the use of immunosuppressive agents whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in randomized trials. More recently, new biological agents, such as rituximab, have proved to be effective in patients with neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and are currently tested in CIDP.

Current and Emerging Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Disorders

Peripheral nerve disorders are caused by a range of different aetiologies. The range of causes include metabolic conditions such as diabetes, obesity and chronic kidney disease. Diabetic neuropathy may be associated with severe weakness and the loss of sensation, leading to gangrene and amputation in advanced cases. Recent studies have indicated a high prevalence of neuropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease, also known as uraemic neuropathy. Immune-mediated neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy may cause significant physical disability. As survival rates continue to improve in cancer, the prevalence of treatment complications, such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, has also increased in treated patients and survivors. Notably, peripheral neuropathy associated with these conditions may be chronic and long-lasting, drastically affecting the quality of life of affected individuals, and leading to a large socioeconomic burden. This review article explores some of the major emerging clinical and experimental therapeutic agents that have been investigated for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy due to metabolic, toxic and immune aetiologies.

Immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, probably immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. Treatment options for MMN are few. People with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange. Uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005, with an amendment in 2007. We updated the review to incorporate new evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in people with MMN.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 20 April 2021: the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, and checked the reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs and quasi-RCTs examining the effects of any dose of IVIg and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in people with definite or probable MMN for inclusion in the review. Eligible studies had to have measured at least one of the following outcomes: disability, muscle strength, or electrophysiological conduction block. We used studies that reported the frequency of adverse effects to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed the literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We followed standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

Six cross-over RCTs including a total of 90 participants were suitable for inclusion in the review. Five RCTs compared IVIg to placebo, and one compared IVIg to SCIg. Four of the trials comparing IVIg versus placebo involved IVIg-naive participants (induction treatment). In the other two trials, participants were known IVIg responders receiving maintencance IVIg at baseline and were then randomised to maintenance treatment with IVIg or placebo in one trial, and IVIg or SCIg in the other. Risk of bias was variable in the included studies, with three studies at high risk of bias in at least one risk of bias domain. IVIg versus placebo (induction treatment): three RCTs including IVIg-naive participants reported a disability measure. Disability improved in seven out of 18 (39%) participants after IVIg treatment and in two out of 18 (11%) participants after placebo (risk ratio (RR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 10.12; 3 RCTs, 18 participants; low-certainty evidence). The proportion of participants with an improvement in disability at 12 months was not reported. Strength improved in 21 out of 27 (78%) IVIg-naive participants treated with IVIg and one out of 27 (4%) participants who received placebo (RR 11.00, 95% CI 2.86 to 42.25; 3 RCTs, 27 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg treatment may increase the proportion of people with resolution of at least one conduction block; however, the results were also consistent with no effect (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 51.70; 4 RCTs, 28 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg versus placebo (maintenance treatment): a trial that included participants on maintenance IVIg treatment reported an increase in disability in 17 out of 42 (40%) people switching to placebo and seven out of 42 (17%) remaining on IVIg (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.24; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and a decrease in grip strength in 20 out of 42 (48%) participants after a switch to placebo treatment compared to four out of 42 (10%) remaining on IVIg (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.54; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, IVIg versus placebo (induction or maintenance): four trials comparing IVIg and placebo reported adverse events, of which data from two studies could be meta-analysed. Transient side effects were reported in 71% of IVIg-treated participants versus 4.8% of placebo-treated participants in these studies. The pooled RR for the development of side effects was 10.33 (95% CI 2.15 to 49.77; 2 RCTs, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was only one serious side effect (pulmonary embolism) during IVIg treatment. IVIg versus SCIg (maintenance treatment): the trial that compared continuation of IVIg maintenance versus SCIg maintenance did not measure disability. The evidence was very uncertain for muscle strength (standardised mean difference 0.08, 95% CI -0.84 to 1.00; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain for the number of people with side effects attributable to treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.40; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence from three small RCTs shows that IVIg may improve muscle strength in people with MMN, and low-certainty evidence indicates that it may improve disability; the estimate of the magnitude of improvement of disability has wide CIs and needs further studies to secure its significance. Based on moderate-certainty evidence, it is probable that most IVIg responders deteriorate in disability and muscle strength after IVIg withdrawal. SCIg might be an alternative treatment to IVIg, but the evidence is very uncertain. More research is needed to identify people in whom IVIg withdrawal is possible and to confirm efficacy of SCIg as an alternative maintenance treatment.

Safety and efficacy of CAR T cells in a patient with lymphoma and a coexisting autoimmune neuropathy

CAR T-cell therapy was safe and effective in a DLBCL patient with coexisting autoimmune neuropathy. CD19 CAR T-cell therapy may control refractory autoantibodies and monoclonal gammopathies.

Long-term Effects of Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Combination with Mesna Provided Intravenously and via Bladder Perfusion in a Patient with Severe Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

A 25-year-old woman presenting with progressive muscle weakness in the distal extremities in the absence of sensory involvement for 2 years was diagnosed with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Her disease was difficult to manage with various immunosuppressants, and the muscle weakness eventually progressed to involve the respiratory muscles, necessitating mechanical ventilation. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) dramatically improved her symptoms, and she has since maintained her ambulatory status for 18 years with intermittent CY therapy. Because the patient presented with hemorrhagic cystitis due to CY, we also implemented mesna administration by bladder perfusion. The administration of CY should therefore be considered in patients with severe MMN that is unresponsive to standard therapy.

The Importance of Rare Subtypes in Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Peripheral neuropathy is a prevalent condition that usually warrants a thorough history and examination but has limited diagnostic evaluation. However, rare localizations of peripheral neuropathy often require more extensive diagnostic testing and different treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To describe rare localizations of peripheral neuropathy, including the appropriate diagnostic evaluation and available treatments.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

References were identified from PubMed searches conducted on May 29, 2015, with an emphasis on systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials. Articles were also identified through the use of the authors' own files. Search terms included common rare neuropathy localizations and their causes, as well as epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

FINDINGS

Diffuse, nonlength-dependent neuropathies, multiple mononeuropathies, polyradiculopathies, plexopathies, and radiculoplexus neuropathies are rare peripheral neuropathy localizations that often require extensive diagnostic testing. Atypical neuropathy features, such as acute/subacute onset, asymmetry, and/or motor predominant signs, are frequently present. The most common diffuse, nonlength-dependent neuropathies are Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Effective disease-modifying therapies exist for many diffuse, nonlength-dependent neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and some paraprotein-associated demyelinating neuropathies. Vasculitic neuropathy (multiple mononeuropathy) also has efficacious treatment options, but definitive evidence of a treatment effect for IgM anti-MAG neuropathy and diabetic amyotrophy (radiculoplexus neuropathy) is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Recognition of rare localizations of peripheral neuropathy is essential given the implications for diagnostic testing and treatment. Electrodiagnostic studies are an important early step in the diagnostic evaluation and provide information on the localization and pathophysiology of nerve injury.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulins in the treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

Intravenous immunoglobulins represent an established therapy for the treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, specifically chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDPs) as well as multifocal motor neuropathies (MMNs). For the treatment of antibody deficiency syndromes, subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIgs) have represented a mainstay for decades. An emerging body of evidence suggests that SCIg might also exhibit clinical efficacy in CIDP and MMN. This article reviews the current evidence for clinical effectiveness, as well as safety of SCIg for the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies, and addresses remaining open questions in this context. We conclude that despite the need for controlled long-term studies to demonstrate long-term efficacy of SCIg in immune-mediated neuropathies, SCIg may already represent a potential therapeutic alternative for selected patients.

Human immune globulin infusion in the management of multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a debilitating and rare disease causing profound weakness with minimal to no sensory symptoms. Conduction block is frequently seen on electrodiagnostic testing. An immune-mediated pathology is suspected though the exact underlying pathophysiology has yet to be elucidated. The presence of anti-GM1 ganglioside IgM antibodies coupled with favorable response to intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulins supports a complement-mediated mechanism which leads to destruction of nerve tissue with probable predilection to the nodes of Ranvier. High-dose immunoglobulin currently is the only treatment with proven efficacy for MMN patients. Unfortunately, many patients experience decreased responsiveness to immunoglobulins over time, requiring higher and more frequent dosing. In this review, we will focus on the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous and subcutaneous immune globulin infusion for treatment of MMN.

The pathogenesis of multifocal motor neuropathy and an update on current management options

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare and disabling disease. Several experimental studies and clinical data are strongly suggestive of an immune-mediated pathogenesis, although underlying mechanisms in MMN seem to be very specific, mainly because of the presence of IgM anti-GM1 serum antibodies and the dramatic response to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The origin of antiganglioside antibodies and the way in which they act at the molecular level remain unclear. Several studies have demonstrated the key role of complement activation in the underlying mechanisms of MMN, as well as in animal models of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). Deposition of the membrane attack complex may disrupt the architecture of the nodes of Ranvier and paranodal areas, causing local disruption of nodal sodium-channel clusters. In patients with MMN, muscle weakness is the consequence of conduction blocks (CB), which leads to secondary axonal degeneration, consequently the aim of the treatment is to reverse CB at early stages of the disease. High-dose immunoglobulin is to date the only therapy which has proven efficacy in MMN patients in providing transient improvement of muscle strength, but long-term follow-up studies show a progressive motor decline. Therefore, other therapies are needed to improve the conduction nerve properties in long-term design. The reduction of complement activation and more generally the gain in paranodal stabilization could be directions for future therapeutic strategies.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 22 September 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for trials of MMN. We also searched two trials registers for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one RCT of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in MMN. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with IVIg, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for IVIg. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for IVIg or improving muscle strength in MMN. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

Chronic neuropathies are operationally classified as primarily demyelinating or axonal, on the basis of electrodiagnostic or pathological criteria. Demyelinating neuropathies are further classified as hereditary or acquired-this distinction is important, because the acquired neuropathies are immune-mediated and, thus, amenable to treatment. The acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathies include chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathy associated with monoclonal IgM antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG; anti-MAG neuropathy), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and POEMS syndrome. They have characteristic--though overlapping--clinical presentations, are mediated by distinct immune mechanisms, and respond to different therapies. CIDP is the default diagnosis if the neuropathy is demyelinating and no other cause is found. Anti-MAG neuropathy is diagnosed on the basis of the presence of anti-MAG antibodies, MMN is characterized by multifocal weakness and motor conduction blocks, and POEMS syndrome is associated with IgG or IgA λ-type monoclonal gammopathy and osteosclerotic myeloma. The correct diagnosis, however, can be difficult to make in patients with atypical or overlapping presentations, or nondefinitive laboratory studies. First-line treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids or plasmapheresis for CIDP; IVIg for MMN; rituximab for anti-MAG neuropathy; and irradiation or chemotherapy for POEMS syndrome. A correct diagnosis is required for choosing the appropriate treatment, with the aim of preventing progressive neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) remains a difficult issue for neurologists, as its clinical and electrophysiological presentation may be atypical, and because no alternative treatment to periodic immunoglobulin infusions has been assessed in its long-term management. This review intends to summarize the most recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of MMN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports have focused on atypical onset and unusual clinical presentation. Several sophisticated electrophysiological techniques, as triple stimulation, may help establish the presence of conduction blocks, as well as MRI findings. A recent immunological study focused on the detection of serum IgM binding to NS6S heparin disaccharide. In another research article, it was proposed that the use of combinatorial glycoarray or ELISA may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of antiglycolipid antibody testing. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin may represent an interesting alternative option to intravenous immunoglobulin. Lastly, recently reported open-label clinical trials with complement inhibitors and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody may constitute a first step for further developments.

SUMMARY

Diagnostic criteria for MMN are well established, but challenging situations still occur. Progresses in neurophysiologic and other laboratory tests may help in clarifying doubtful diagnoses. Current research into the pathophysiology of MMN is required to determine the future treatment targets.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current therapies and novel strategies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a purely motor mononeuritis multiplex characterized by the presence of conduction block on motor but not on sensory nerves and by the presence of high titers of anti-GM1 antibodies. Several data point to a pathogenetic role of the immune system in this neuropathy, although this has not yet been proved. Several uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of therapy with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in MMN. However, this therapy has a short-lasting effect that needs to be maintained with periodic infusions. This can be partly overcome by the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) at the same dose. The high cost and need for repeated infusions have led to the search for other immune therapies, the efficacy of which have not yet been confirmed in randomized trials. In addition, some therapies, including corticosteroids and plasma exchange, are not only ineffective but have been associated with clinical worsening. More recently, a number of novel therapies have been investigated in MMN, including interferon-β1a, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the complement inhibitor eculizumab. Preliminary data from open-label uncontrolled studies show that some patients improve after these therapies; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy. Until then, IVIg (and SCIg) remains the mainstay of treatment in MMN, and the use of other immune therapies should only be considered for patients not responding to, or becoming resistant to, IVIg.

Treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a treatable immune disorder of the peripheral nerves that is characterized clinically by slowly progressive or stepwise asymmetric distal > proximal, upper > lower limb weakness in multiple motor nerve distributions; electrophysiologically by multifocal motor demyelination, specifically partial motor conduction block; laboratory evidence of high serum anti-GM1 IgM antibodies; and remarkable treatment response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). IVIG has become the treatment of choice, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Gammagard Liquid 10 % [immune globulin infusion (human)] as a treatment for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Response to IVIG in MMN is dose- and frequency-dependent, most patients needing high (2 g/kg) and frequent (every 4-8 weeks) doses for several years. Over time, response to IVIG may decrease despite higher and more frequent dosing of IVIG treatment. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (dose equivalent to IVIG) given in weekly fashion has recently been used with equal efficacy and fewer side effects. There are some case reports and non-randomized trials suggesting variable results from therapeutic or adjunctive use of other immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents such as cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, interferon beta-1a, and rituximab. Of these, cyclophosphamide and rituximab are the only immune treatments that have shown some benefits in case reports. One randomized controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil used as adjunctive agent did not prove efficacious in altering the disease course. Although MMN, like chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), is a chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy, the use of corticosteroids and plasma exchange - two other therapies used in CIDP - is not beneficial for MMN. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate the immunopathogenesis of MMN and to explore options for dose, frequency, and duration of IVIG treatment as well as the use of alternative immunomodulatory agents either as primary therapeutic or adjunctive agents.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: a review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an uncommon, purely motor neuropathy associated with asymmetric deficits with predilection for upper limb involvement. Even in the early descriptions of MMN, the associations of anti-GM1 antibodies and robust response to immunomodulatory treatment were recognized. These features highlight the likelihood of an underlying autoimmune etiology of MMN. The clinical presentation of MMN can closely mimic several neurological conditions including those with more malignant prognoses such as motor neuron disease. Therefore early and rapid recognition of MMN is critical. Serological evidence of anti GM-1 antibodies and electrodiagnostic findings of conduction block are helpful diagnostic clues for MMN. Importantly, these diagnostic features are not universally present, and patients lacking these characteristic findings can demonstrate similar robust response to immunodulatory treatment. In the current review, recent research in the areas of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of MMN and needs for the future are discussed. The characteristic findings of MMN and treatment implications are reviewed and contrasted with other mimicking disorders.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a chronic immune-mediated neuropathy that is particular for its asymmetric, multifocal, purely motor clinical presentation, often related to the distribution of individual nerves. Upper limbs are usually primarily and more severely affected, but lower limbs may be involved during the course of the disease. The hallmark of the disease is the presence, in electrophysiological studies, of persistent conduction blocks in the affected motor nerves, located outside the usual sites of nerve compression, contrasting with normal sensory nerve conduction velocities. The most typical laboratory finding is the presence of high levels of serum IgM antibodies to the ganglioside GM1, and less frequently to asialo-GM1, GD1a or GM2. These striking features may help distinguishing this neuropathy from both motor neuron disease and other chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have established the efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), as well as subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). However, this therapy has a short-lasting effect, and need to be maintained with periodic infusions. This disappointing status has led to the search of other immune therapies whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in RCT. This review intends to summarize current contents in the diagnosis and the treatment of MMN.

Multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, and other chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy variants

Chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathies (CADP) constitute an important group of immune neuromuscular disorders affecting myelin. This article discusses CADP with emphasis on multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy, and less common variants. Although each of these entities has distinctive laboratory and electrodiagnostic features that aid in their diagnosis, clinical characteristics are of paramount importance in diagnosing specific conditions and determining the most appropriate therapies. Knowledge regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of these disorders continues to expand, resulting in improved opportunities for identification and treatment.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare disorder in which the symptoms are caused by persistent conduction block lesions. The mononeuropathy multiplex progresses over time with increasing axonal loss. The cause of the conduction blocks and axonal loss are not completely understood but immune mechanisms are involved and response to intravenous immunoglobulin has been established. The importance of MMN goes beyond its clinical incidence as the increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of this disorder has implications for other peripheral nerve diseases and for our knowledge of peripheral nerve biology.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was first described in 1988 as a purely motor neuropathy affecting multiple motor nerves. The diagnosis was based entirely on demonstrating electrophysiological evidence of a conduction block (CB) that selectively affected motor axons, with sparing of sensory axons even through the site of motor CB. Subsequently, a similar disorder was reported but with absence of demonstrable CB on routine nerve conduction studies and there is still some debate as to whether MMN without CB is related to MMN. MMN is thought to be an inflammatory neuropathy related to an immune attack on motor nerves. The conventional hypothesis is that the primary pathology is segmental demyelination, but recent research raises the possibility of a primary axonopathy. Anti-GM1 antibodies can be found in some patients but it is unclear whether these antibodies are pathogenic. Intravenous immunoglobulin is the mainstay of treatment but other immunosuppressive treatments can also be effective.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies

Immune-mediated neuropathies represent a heterogeneous spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders that can be classified according to time course, predominant involvement of motor/sensory fibers, distribution of deficits and paraclinical parameters such as electrophysiology and serum antibodies. In the last few years, significant advances have been achieved in elucidating underlying pathomechanisms, which made it possible to identify potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we discuss the latest development in pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (October 8 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to October 8 2008), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to October 8 2008), for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were to be included and one was found. Prospective and retrospective case series and case reports were considered in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found the first randomised controlled trial of multifocal motor neuropathy. This study, which randomised 28 patients, showed that mycophenolate mofetil did not significantly improve strength or function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the only randomised placebo-controlled trial of any immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

The clinical value of therapeutic plasma exchange in multifocal motor neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Although there is evidence for a pathogenic role of humoral factors in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), plasma exchange (PE) is assumed to be an ineffective treatment. We set out to elucidate possible reasons for this apparent contradiction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of seven patients with MMN, who underwent 4 to 18 sessions of PE. Clinical response, electrophysiological parameter and anti-ganglioside antibody titers were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two patients, who had anti-ganglioside antibodies, exhibited transient clinical responses to PE, manifested by improved neurological function. Whereas electrophysiological parameters continued to worsen in all patients, anti-ganglioside antibody titers declined during PE, but increased after PE.

CONCLUSION

PE is of limited therapeutic value in patients with MMN, who do not respond to established treatment options. It may only be useful as an adjunctive treatment in a subset of patients. The transient decrease of anti-ganglioside-antibodies titers suggests that pathogenic humoral factors in MMN are only temporarily reduced. Further, PE treatment alone is insufficient to prevent axons from continuing degeneration, which may explain the failure of PE to substantially influence the disease course of patients with MMN.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy have been proposed in recent years and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies. The objectives were to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were: (i) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment. (ii) Corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point). (iii) If initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point). (iv) If IVIg is not or not sufficiently effective then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, azathioprine, interferon beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point). (v) Toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society

BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) have been proposed in recent years, and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this guideline was to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of MMN.

METHODS

Disease experts and a representative of patients considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were as follows: (1) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line of treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment; (2) corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point); (3) if initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point); (4) if IVIg is not (or not sufficiently) effective, then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, interferon-beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point); and (5) toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

Neuropathie motrice multifocale avec blocs de conduction persistants

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was first specifically identified in 1986. Its major criterion is conduction blocks in motor nerves only. Clinically, this is a multifocal, thus asymmetric, neuropathy that begins and predominant touches upper limbs; it especially affects men after the age of 50 years and has a chronic course with relapses. Approximately 40-50% of patients also have IgM serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. There are no other laboratory criteria, although moderately high protein levels are found in cerebrospinal fluid. Its course is unpredictable, because the neuropathy may remain limited to one or two motor nerves or extend progressively to all the motor nerves of all four limbs. In general, there is no damage to sensory or cranial nerves or to the autonomic or central nervous systems. Intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulins at high doses are remarkably effective in the short term in 70 to 80% of cases. Corticosteroids and plasma exchange are generally ineffective and may aggravate the neuropathy. The long-term efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins in delaying motor decline and axon loss in the affected motor nerves is controversial. No information is currently available about the long-term efficacy of other immunomodulatory treatment.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Immune-mediated Neuropathies

The chronic autoimmune neuropathies are a diverse group of disorders, whose diagnosis and classification is based on the clinical presentations and results of ancillary tests. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, controlled therapeutic trials demonstrated efficacy for intravenous gamma-globulins, corticosteroids, and plasmaphereis. In multifocal motor neuropathy, intravenous gamma-globulins have been shown to be effective. In the other immune-mediated neuropathies, there are no reported controlled therapeutic trials, but efficacy has been reported for some treatments in non-controlled trials on case studies. Choice of therapy in individual cases is based on reported efficacy, as well as severity, progression, coexisting illness, predisposition to developing complications, and potential drug interactions.

High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell rescue for refractory multifocal motor neuropathy

Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) respond to intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) and cyclophosphamide, although the benefit is not sustained. High-dose cyclophosphamide can induce a remission in patients with autoimmune diseases, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We describe a patient with refractory MMN who improved with high-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg for 4 days) without stem cell rescue. Following treatment she discontinued IVIg. At a 6-month examination, her strength had improved and she had regained the ability to write. High-dose cyclophosphamide may be a successful treatment for patients with MMN refractory to other therapies.

The effect of treatment upon temporal dispersion in IvIg responsive multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) is a treatable disorder that can be mistaken for other lower motor neurone syndromes. Existing electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN are restrictive. In particular, many are cautious about diagnosing conduction block (CB) in the presence of abnormal temporal dispersion (TD).

OBJECTIVE

To study the significance of TD in MMN, its relationship to CB in intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) responsive patients, and its utility in detecting a treatment response.

METHODS

We compared pre- and post-treatment changes in CB and TD in nine patients who satisfied clinical and electrophysiological criteria for MMN and responded to IvIg.

RESULTS

TD improved in one or more nerve segments in eight of nine patients tested. There was marked improvement in 65% of all nerve segments, and 60% of those segments with CB. By comparison, significant improvement in CB occurred in only 33% of segments. Of segments with significantly better CB after treatment, all but one showed similar improvements in TD. Such changes were not related to the degree of TD before treatment, being seen in segments with abnormal as well as normal TD. There was no correlation between improvements seen in TD and CB.

CONCLUSION

We believe that TD should be considered an inherent feature of MMN. Improvement in TD is an independent marker of electrophysiological improvement in this disorder and is likely to be more useful than CB. When MMN is clinically suspected, the use of stringent criteria for CB in the presence of TD should be avoided.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The diagnostic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'ciclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. We updated the register search in February 2004 and searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to end May 2004) and EMBASE (January 1980 to end May 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in the 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinised for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

CD16+CD57– Natural Killer Cells in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

We analyzed the CD16+CD57- lymphocyte subset, which is considered to have strong natural killer (NK) cell activity, in peripheral blood from patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathies and patients with other neurological diseases. We found that the ratio of CD16+CD57- NK cells to total lymphocytes was increased in 4 of 6 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with persistent conduction block. Since the CD16 molecule is an Fc receptor for immunoglobulin G (IgG), high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) may interfere with CD16+CD57- NK cells via Fc receptor blockade. In addition, cyclophosphamide (Cy) is often used to suppress NK cells. Therefore, our findings may partly account for the effectiveness of IVIg or Cy, which is the current treatment of choice for MMN.

IVIg in idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies: analysis in the light of the latest results

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is effective in the treatment of idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), representing a useful option or, as in MMN, the gold standard for their treatment. In GBS, two randomised, controlled trials (RCT) showed that IVIg is at least as effective as plasma exchange (PE). IVIg may however be preferred due to its low number of contraindications and complications and the fact that it can be administered at any time, in any department, including patients with contraindications to PE, or in intensive care units. In CIDP, at least four RCTs have demonstrated the efficacy of IVIg in over 60% of CIDP patients, while two additional RCTs have shown a comparable effect to steroids and PE as initial treatment. As with PE, the effects of IVIg usually last a few weeks meaning that the majority of patients require periodic maintenance infusions. The lower cost and easier administration of oral steroids compared to IVIg may be partly compensated by the safer long-term profile of IVIg over steroids. In MMN, almost 80% of patients improve with IVIg, the efficacy of which has been confirmed by four RCTs, making of IVIg the first-choice therapy in MMN, for which steroids and PE are ineffective or even detrimental. Also in these patients, IVIg induces a rapid improvement that usually lasts only a few weeks and has to be maintained with periodic IVIg infusions for long periods of time, if not indefinitely.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare, probably immune mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. The treatment options for multifocal motor neuropathy are sparse. Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, and may even worsen with these treatments. Many uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group to search the Disease Group register (searched September 2003), MEDLINE (January 1990 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003) and ISI (January 1990 to September 2003) databases for randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies examining the effects of any dose of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo in patients with definite or probable multifocal motor neuropathy. Outcome measures had to include one of the following: disability, strength, or conduction block. Studies which reported the frequency of adverse effects were used to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, scored their quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks, and for continuous data, effect sizes and weighted pooled effect sizes. Statistical uncertainty was expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials including a total of 34 patients were suitable for this systematic review. Strength improved in 78% of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and only 4% of placebo-treated patients. Disability improved in 39% of patients after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and in 11% after placebo (statistically not significantly different). Mild, transient side effects were reported in 71% of intravenous immunoglobulin treated patients. Serious side effects were not encountered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin has a beneficial effect on strength. There was a non-significant trend towards improvement in disability. More research is needed to discover whether intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability and is cost-effective.

Treatment of dysimmune neuropathies

Several therapies are currently used in dys-immune neuropathies including steroids,plasma exchange (PE), high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins(IVIg), and immuno-suppressive agents (IS). Even if there is substantial evidence that these treatments may improve the course of the neuropathy, their effectiveness is far from being complete and is sometime hampered by the occurrence of associated side effects. In Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS),IVIg and PE are similarly effective in accelerating the recovery but there is still little evidence that they can reduce mortality or long-term disability. Recent reports on the association of intravenous methylprednisolone or interferon-beta (IFN-beta) to IVIg did not result in significant further improvement. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy(CIDP) steroids, PE, and IVIG are initially similarly effective. The short-term effect of PE and IVIgand the side effects associated with the long-term use of steroids have prompted the use of several IS, interferon and,more recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal-antibody Rituximab, but their efficacy has still to be proved in controlled studies. The recent identification of multifocal motor neuropathy(MMN) was shortly followed by the finding of an effective therapy. Almost 80% of patients respond toIVIg whose effect needs to be maintained with periodic infusions for long periods of time, and tends to decrease after several years. Also in this condition a number of immune modulating agents have been used to reduce the frequency or improve the effectiveness of IVIg,but their efficacy has not been sofar confirmed in randomized trials. Similar conclusions can be drawn for neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies where only PE and IVIg have proved to be effective in controlled studies,while the promising initial results obtained with Rituximab in neuropathy associated IgM monoclonal gammopathy awaits confirmation from controlled trials.

Neuropathies motrices multifocales avec blocs de conduction persistants : 18 ans après

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was firstly reported in 1986 and outlined from the group of purely motor diseases of the peripheral nervous system. The main criterion is the presence of conduction blocks located only on the motor nerves; additionally 30 percent of patients have IgM subclass serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. The clinical picture is a multifocal, asymmetrical, neuropathy, starting and predominant in the upper limbs, occurring in males aged 50 years and more, and having a progressive course. There is no biological sign besides elevated anti-GM1 antibodies. CSF analysis discloses mild increased protein count. The course is unpredictable, the neuropathy may be strictly limited to one or two motor nerves, or spread to other motor nerves in the four limbs. There is no involvement of the sensory and the cranial nerves, no involvement of the autonomic and the central nervous system. The pathophysiology is unknown, animal models do not allow to confirm the role of humoral immunity, and the role of anti-GM1 antibodies is controversial. Randomized controlled trials have assessed the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins which dramatically improve strength in 70-80 percent of patients in the short term, but remain unable to prevent motor deterioration in most patients, together with the occurrence of new conduction blocks. Corticosteroids and plasma exchanges do not improve the patients and may be followed by transient worsening. Long-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents is not known.

Serum IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies in lower motor neuron syndromes

Lower motor neuron syndromes (LMNS) are heterogenous conditions, which include patients with progressive lower motor neuron disease (LMND) and cases with the clinical phenotype of motor neuropathy (MN). The aim of this study was to estimate the IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies titer and the ratio of the light chains in order to define the presence of autoimmunity process in particular cases with LMNS. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with LMND and 15 patients were diagnosed with MN (10 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block, five patients with MN without conduction block). Total of 103 patients with classical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 50 healthy, age-matched persons were also tested. The IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside titer and the ratio of lambda/kappa light chains in serum were determined using the ELISA technique. High titer of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies were detected in serum of 46% LMND patients, 80% of MN patients, and 18% of the classical ALS cases. An elevated ratio of lambda/kappa light chains appeared in 18% of LMND patients, and in 67% of the MN cases. The lambda/kappa light chains ratio was normal in all ALS patients. The presence of elevated titer of IgM anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies and the changed ratio of the light chains supports the presence of autoimmune process in LMNS and may provide clues for their management.

Immunotherapy of idiopathic inflammatory neuropathies

Evaluation of peripheral neuropathy is a common reason for referral to a neurologist. Recent advances in immunology have identified an inflammatory component in many neuropathies and have led to treatment trials using agents that attenuate this response. This article reviews the clinical presentation and treatment of the most common subacute inflammatory neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Fisher syndrome, and describes the lack of response to corticosteroids and the efficacy of treatment with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, although sharing some clinical, electrodiagnostic, and pathologic similarities to GBS, improves after treatment with plasma exchange and IVIG and numerous immunomodulatory agents. Controlled trials in multifocal motor neuropathy have shown benefit after treatment with IVIG and cyclophosphamide. Also discussed is the treatment of less common inflammatory neuropathies whose pathophysiology involves monoclonal proteins or antibodies directed against myelin-associated glycoprotein or sulfatide. Little treatment data exist to direct the clinician to proper management of rare inflammatory neuropathies resulting from osteosclerotic myeloma; POEMS syndrome; vasculitis; Sjögren's syndrome; and neoplasia (paraneoplastic neuropathy).

Treatment of IgM antibody associated polyneuropathies using rituximab

OBJECTIVES

Polyneuropathies with associated serum IgM antibodies are often difficult to treat. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the B cell surface membrane marker CD20. Rituximab eliminates B cells from the circulation, and, over time, could reduce cells producing autoantibodies. This study tested the ability of rituximab to produce changes in serum antibody titres, and improvement in strength, in patients with neuromuscular disorders and IgM autoantibodies.

METHODS

Over a period of two years, the authors evaluated changes in strength, measured by quantitative dynamometry, and concentrations of several types of serum antibodies in patients with polyneuropathies and serum IgM autoantibodies. Twenty one patients treated with rituximab were compared with 13 untreated controls.

RESULTS

Treatment with rituximab was followed by improved strength (an increase of mean (SEM) 23% (2%)of normal levels of strength), a reduction in serum IgM autoantibodies (to 43% (4%) of initial values), and a reduction in total levels of IgM (to 55% (4%) of initial values). There was no change in levels of serum IgG antibodies. There were no major side effects, even though B cells were virtually eliminated from the circulation for periods up to two years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IgM autoantibody associated peripheral neuropathies, rituximab treatment is followed by reduced serum concentrations of IgM, but not IgG, antibodies, and by improvement in strength. Additional studies, with placebo controls and blinded outcome measures, are warranted to further test the efficacy of rituximab treatment of IgM associated polyneuropathies.