Muscarinic antagonists in the treatment of acquired pendular and downbeat nystagmus: a double-blind, randomized trial of three intravenous drugs

Current and Emerging Medical Therapies for Dizziness

Medical therapies for dizziness are aimed at vertigo reduction, secondary symptom management, or the root cause of the pathologic process. Acute peripheral vertigo pharmacotherapies include antihistamines, calcium channel blockers, and benzodiazepines. Prophylactic pharmacotherapies vary between causes. For Meniere disease, betahistine and diuretics remain initial first-line oral options, whereas intratympanic steroids and intratympanic gentamicin are reserved for uncontrolled symptoms. For cerebellar dizziness and oculomotor disorders, 4-aminopyridine may provide benefit. For vestibular migraine, persistent postural perceptual dizziness and mal de débarquement, treatment options overlap and include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and calcium channel blockers.

Advances in pharmacotherapy of vestibular and ocular motor disorders

INTRODUCTION

Vertigo and dizziness are common chief complaints of vestibular and ocular motor disorders (lifetime prevalence 30%). Treatment relies on physical, pharmacological, psychological and rarely surgical approaches. Eight groups of drugs are currently used in vestibular and ocular motor disorders, namely anti-vertiginous, anti-inflammatory, anti-menière's, anti-migrainous medications, anti-depressants, anti-convulsants, aminopyridines and agents that enhance vestibular plasticity.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to summarize the pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications of medications that are used for peripheral, central and functional vestibular and ocular motor disorders. The level of evidence for the respective drugs is described alongside the pathophysiological premises supporting their use. The authors place particular focus on translation and back-translation in vestibular pharmacological research and the repurposing of known drugs for new indications and rare disorders.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of drugs in vestibular and ocular motor disorders is often based on open-label, non-controlled studies and expert opinion. In the future, strong evidence derived from RCTs is needed to support the effectiveness and tolerability of these therapies in well-defined vestibular and ocular motor disorders. Vestibular pharmacological research must be guided by a better understanding of the molecular targets relevant in the pathophysiology of vestibular and ocular motor disorders.

Interventions for eye movement disorders due to acquired brain injury

BACKGROUND

Acquired brain injury can cause eye movement disorders which may include: strabismus, gaze deficits and nystagmus, causing visual symptoms of double, blurred or 'juddery' vision and reading difficulties. A wide range of interventions exist that have potential to alleviate or ameliorate these symptoms. There is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and the timing of their implementation.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of any intervention and determine the effect of timing of intervention in the treatment of strabismus, gaze deficits and nystagmus due to acquired brain injury. We considered restitutive, substitutive, compensatory or pharmacological interventions separately and compared them to control, placebo, alternative treatment or no treatment for improving ocular alignment or motility (or both).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (containing the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL EBSCO, AMED Ovid, PsycINFO Ovid, Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, PsycBITE (Psychological Database for Brain Impairment Treatment Efficacy), ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRProj), National Eye Institute Clinical Studies Database and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). The databases were last searched on 26 June 2017. No date or language restrictions were used in the electronic searches for trials. We manually searched the Australian Orthoptic Journal, British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, and ESA, ISA and IOA conference proceedings. We contacted researchers active in this field for information about further published or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any intervention for ocular alignment or motility deficits (or both) due to acquired brain injury.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. We employed the GRADE approach to interpret findings and assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We found five RCTs (116 participants) that were eligible for inclusion. These trials included conditions of acquired nystagmus, sixth cranial nerve palsy and traumatic brain injury-induced ocular motility defects. We did not identify any relevant studies of restitutive interventions.We identified one UK-based trial of a substitutive intervention, in which botulinum toxin was compared with observation in 47 people with acute sixth nerve palsy. At four months after entry into the trial, people given botulinum toxin were more likely to make a full recovery (reduction in angle of deviation within 10 prism dioptres), compared with observation (risk ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.48; low-certainty evidence). These same participants also achieved binocular single vision. In the injection group only, there were 2 cases of transient ptosis out of 22 participants (9%), and 4 participants out of 22 (18%) with transient vertical deviation; a total complication rate of 24% per injection and 27% per participant. All adverse events recovered. We judged the certainty of evidence as low, downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision. It was not possible to mask investigators or participants to allocation, and the follow-up between groups varied.We identified one USA-based cross-over trial of a compensatory intervention. Oculomotor rehabilitation was compared with sham training in 12 people with mild traumatic brain injury, at least one year after the injury. We judged the evidence from this study to be very low-certainty. The study was small, data for the sham training group were not fully reported, and it was unclear if a cross-over study design was appropriate as this is an intervention with potential to have a permanent effect.We identified three cross-over studies of pharmacological interventions for acquired nystagmus, which took place in Germany and the USA. These studies investigated two classes of pharmacological interventions: GABAergic drugs (gabapentin, baclofen) and aminopyridines (4-aminopyridines (AP), 3,4-diaminopyridine (DAP)). We judged the evidence from all three studies as very low-certainty because of small numbers of participants (which led to imprecision) and risk of bias (they were cross-over studies which did not report data in a way that permitted estimation of effect size).One study compared gabapentin (up to 900 mg/day) with baclofen (up to 30 mg/day) in 21 people with pendular and jerk nystagmus. The follow-up period was two weeks. This study provides very low-certainty evidence that gabapentin may work better than baclofen in improving ocular motility and reducing participant-reported symptoms (oscillopsia). These effects may be different in pendular and jerk nystagmus, but without formal subgroup analysis it is unclear if the difference between the two types of nystagmus was chance finding. Quality of life was not reported. Ten participants with pendular nystagmus chose to continue treatment with gabapentin, and one with baclofen. Two participants with jerk nystagmus chose to continue treatment with gabapentin, and one with baclofen. Drug intolerance was reported in one person receiving gabapentin and in four participants receiving baclofen. Increased ataxia was reported in three participants receiving gabapentin and two participants receiving baclofen.One study compared a single dose of 3,4-DAP (20 mg) with placebo in 17 people with downbeat nystagmus. Assessments were made 30 minutes after taking the drug. This study provides very low-certainty evidence that 3,4-DAP may reduce the mean peak slow-phase velocity, with less oscillopsia, in people with downbeat nystagmus. Three participants reported transient side effects of minor perioral/distal paraesthesia.One study compared a single dose of 4-AP with a single dose of 3,4-DAP (both 10 mg doses) in eight people with downbeat nystagmus. Assessments were made 45 and 90 minutes after drug administration. This study provides very low-certainty evidence that both 3,4-DAP and 4-AP may reduce the mean slow-phase velocity in people with downbeat nystagmus. This effect may be stronger with 4-AP.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The included studies provide insufficient evidence to inform decisions about treatments specifically for eye movement disorders that occur following acquired brain injury. No information was obtained on the cost of treatment or measures of participant satisfaction relating to treatment options and effectiveness. It was possible to describe the outcome of treatment in each trial and ascertain the occurrence of adverse events.

Symptomatic treatment and management of multiple sclerosis

The range of symptoms which occur in multiple sclerosis (MS) can have disabling functional consequences for patients and lead to significant reductions in their quality of life. MS symptoms can also interact with each other, making their management challenging. Clinical trials aimed at identifying symptomatic therapies have generally been poorly designed and have tended to be underpowered. Therefore, the evidence base for the management of MS symptoms with pharmacologic therapies is not strong and tends to rely upon open-label studies, case reports, and clinical trials with small numbers of patients and poorly validated clinical outcome measures. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the management of MS symptoms with pharmacologic treatments, and better-designed, randomized, double-blind, controlled trials have been reported. This chapter will describe the evidence base predominantly behind the various pharmacologic approaches to the management of MS symptoms, which in most, if not all, cases, requires multidisciplinary input. Drugs routinely recommended for individual symptoms and new therapies, which are currently in the development pipeline, will be reviewed. More interventional therapies related to symptoms that are refractory to pharmacotherapy will also be discussed, where relevant.

Pharmaceutical countermeasures have opposite effects on the utricles and semicircular canals in man

INTRODUCTION

Sensory conflicts in the vestibular system lead to motion sickness of which space motion sickness (SMS) is a special case. SMS affects up to 70% of the astronauts during the first 3 days in space. The search for effective countermeasures has led to several nonpharmacological and pharmacological approaches. The current study focuses on the effects of lorazepam (1 mg), meclizine (25 mg), promethazine (25 mg), and scopolamine (0.4 mg) on the vestibular system, with special focus on the canal and otolith functions separately.

METHODS

The study had a placebo-controlled, single blind, repeated measures design. Sixteen healthy volunteers were subjected to a total of 7 test sessions, the first and last being without intake of medication. Semicircular canal function was evaluated by means of electronystagmography and otolith function with unilateral centrifugation. The horizontal semicircular canal function was characterized by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain measured during earth vertical axis rotation as well as the total caloric response. The function of the utricles was represented by the utricular sensitivity, reflecting the ocular counter roll relative to the virtual induced head tilt.

RESULTS

Promethazine significantly decreased the semicircular canal and utricular parameters. Both scopolamine and lorazepam caused only a decrease in the utricular sensitivity, whereas meclizine only decreased the semicircular canal-induced VOR gain.

DISCUSSION

The results show that the drugs affected different areas of the vestibular system and that the effects can thus be attributed to the specific pharmacological properties of each drug. Meclizine, as an antihistaminergic and weak anticholinergic drug, only affected the VOR gain, suggesting a central action on the medial vestibular nucleus. The same site of action is suggested for the anticholinergic scopolamine since acetylcholine receptors are present and utricular fibers terminate here. The global vestibular suppression caused by promethazine is probably a consequence of its anticholinergic, antihistaminergic, and antidopaminergic properties. Based on the fact that lorazepam increased the affinity of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) for the GABA(A)-receptor and its effects on the utriculi, the site of action seems to be the lateral vestibular nucleus.

CONCLUSION

Meclizine, scopolamine, and lorazepam selectively suppress specific parts of the vestibular system. Selective suppression of different parts of the vestibular system may be more beneficial for alleviating (space) motion sickness than general suppressive agents. Additionally, this knowledge may help the clinician in his therapeutic management of patients with either semicircular canal or otolith dysfunction.

What we know about the generation of nystagmus and other ocular oscillations: are we closer to identifying therapeutic targets?

Mechanisms underlying acquired nystagmus are better understood than those leading to infantile nystagmus. Accordingly, further progress has been made in the development of effective therapies for acquired nystagmus, mainly through pharmacological interventions. Some of these therapies have been developed under the guidance of findings from experimental animal models. Although mechanisms behind infantile nystagmus are less understood, progress has been made in determining the genetic basis of nystagmus and characterizing associated sensory deficits. Pharmacological, surgical, and other treatments options for infantile nystagmus are now emerging. Further investigations are required for all forms of nystagmus to produce high-quality evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, upon which clinicians can make appropriate treatment decisions.

Therapy for nystagmus

Pathological forms of nystagmus and their visual consequences can be treated using pharmacological, optical, and surgical approaches. Acquired periodic alternating nystagmus improves following treatment with baclofen, and downbeat nystagmus may improve following treatment with aminopyridines. Gabapentin and memantine are helpful in reducing acquired pendular nystagmus due to multiple sclerosis. Ocular oscillations in oculopalatal tremor may also improve following treatment with memantine or gabapentin. The infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) may have only a minor impact on vision if "foveation periods" are well developed, but symptomatic patients may benefit from treatment with gabapentin, memantine, or base-out prisms to induce convergence. Several surgical therapies are also reported to improve INS, but selection of the optimal treatment depends on careful evaluation of visual acuity and nystagmus intensity in various gaze positions. Electro-optical devices are a promising and novel approach for treating the visual consequences of acquired forms of nystagmus.

Nystagmus and oscillopsia

The ocular motor system consists of several subsystems, including the vestibular ocular nystagmus saccade system, the pursuit system, the fixation and gaze-holding system and the vergence system. All these subsystems aid the stabilization of the images on the retina during eye and head movements and any kind of disturbance of one of the systems can cause instability of the eyes (e.g. nystagmus) or an inadequate eye movement causing a mismatch between head and eye movement (e.g. bilateral vestibular failure). In both situations, the subjects experience a movement of the world (oscillopsia) which is quite disturbing. New insights into the patho-physiology of some of the ocular motor disorders have helped to establish new treatment options, in particular in downbeat nystagmus, upbeat nystagmus, periodic alternating nystagmus, acquired pendular nystagmus and paroxysmal vestibular episodes/attacks. The discussed patho-physiology of these disorders and the current literature on treatment options are discussed and practical treatment recommendations are given in the paper.

Nystagmus and saccadic intrusions

We review current concepts of nystagmus and saccadic oscillations, applying a pathophysiological approach. We begin by discussing how nystagmus may arise when the mechanisms that normally hold gaze steady are impaired. We then describe the clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients with ocular oscillations. Next, we systematically review the features of nystagmus arising from peripheral and central vestibular disorders, nystagmus due to an abnormal gaze-holding mechanism (neural integrator), and nystagmus occurring when vision is compromised. We then discuss forms of nystagmus for which the pathogenesis is not well understood, including acquired pendular nystagmus and congenital forms of nystagmus. We then summarize the spectrum of saccadic disorders that disrupt steady gaze, from intrusions to flutter and opsoclonus. Finally, we review current treatment options for nystagmus and saccadic oscillations, including drugs, surgery, and optical methods. Examples of each type of nystagmus are provided in the form of figures.

Oscillopsies : approches physiopathologique et thérapeutique

Oscillopsia is an illusion of an unstable visual world. It is associated with poor visual acuity and is a disabling and stressful symptom reported by numerous patients with neurological disorders. The goal of this paper is to review the physiology of the systems subserving stable vision, the various pathophysiological mechanisms of oscillopsia and the different treatments available. Visual stability is conditioned by two factors. First, images of the seen world projected onto the retina have to be stable, a sine qua non condition for foveal discriminative function. Vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic reflexes act to stabilize the retinal images during head displacements; ocular fixation tends to limit the occurrence of micro ocular movements during gazing; a specific system also acts to maintain the eyes stable during eccentric gaze. Second, although we voluntary move our gaze (body, head and eye displacements), the visual world is normally perceived as stable, a phenomenon known as space constancy. Indeed, complex cognitive processes compensate for the two sensory consequences of gaze displacement, namely an oppositely-directed retinal drift and a change in the relationship between retinal and spatial (or subject-centered) coordinates of the visual scene. In patients, oscillopsia most often results from abnormal eye movements which cause excessive motion of images on the retina, such as nystagmus or saccadic intrusions or from an impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex. Understanding the exact mechanisms of impaired eye stability may lead to the different treatment options that have been documented in recent years. Oscillopsia could also result from an impairment of spatial constancy mechanisms that in normal condition compensate for gaze displacements, but clinical data in this case are scarce. However, we suggest that some visuo-perceptive deficits consecutive to temporo-parietal lesions resemble oscillopsia and could result from a deficit in elaborating spatial constancy.

Optic neuritis and the neuro-ophthalmology of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults. Since approximately 40% of the brain is devoted to vision, demyelination commonly affects visual function, resulting in a myriad of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms. In this chapter, we examine the seminal afferent and efferent neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of MS, highlighting those history and examination findings critical for the diagnosis and treatment of various visual and ocular motor disorders. Among the topics, a special emphasis will be placed on optic neuritis, the most common clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome. This chapter focuses on the evaluation and treatment of visual sensory and oculomotor disorders in MS. The objective is to provide the reader with a working model for enhancing their care of patients with demyelinating disease.

Survey of management of acquired nystagmus in the United Kingdom

PURPOSE

To determine the current management of acquired nystagmus by ophthalmologists and neurologists.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to ophthalmologists (850) and neurologists (434) in the United Kingdom. Estimated numbers of patients seen with acquired nystagmus, treatment options used, and the results of treatment of the patients were collected.

RESULTS

Response rate was 37% for ophthalmologists and 34% for neurologists. The most common causes of acquired nystagmus were estimated to be multiple sclerosis and stroke. 58% of ophthalmologists and 94.5% of neurologists reported seeing patients with nystagmus. The most commonly used medical treatment was gabapentin and baclofen. Other drugs used were clonazepam, carbamazepine, benzhexol, ondansetrone, buspirone, memantine, and botulinum toxin (n=3). Eleven ophthalmologists and 52 neurologists noted symptomatic improvement with medical treatment. Eleven ophthalmologists and 44 neurologists noted improvement in visual acuity (VA). Occurrence of side effects noted with baclofen and gabapentin treatments were similar.

CONCLUSION

A variety of drugs are used to treat acquired nystagmus in the UK. Baclofen and gabapentin are the drugs most commonly used and are reported to cause significant improvement in symptoms and VA. Better knowledge of the action of drugs in nystagmus is needed to establish guidelines and to give patients wider access to treatment.

EFNS task force - therapy of nystagmus and oscillopsia

An overview of possible treatment options for oculomotor disorders that prevent clear vision is given. Downbeat nystagmus, upbeat nystagmus, seesaw nystagmus, periodic alternating nystagmus, acquired pendular nystagmus, and saccadic oscillations such as opsoclonus/ocular flutter are discussed. In addition, superior oblique myokymia and vestibular paroxysmia are reviewed. All treatment recommendations available in the literature are classified as class C only. In general, only some of the patients benefit from the treatment.

Pharmacological treatment of vertigo

This review discusses the physiology and pharmacological treatment of vertigo and related disorders. Classes of medications useful in the treatment of vertigo include anticholinergics, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, calcium channel antagonists and dopamine receptor antagonists. These medications often have multiple actions. They may modify the intensity of symptoms (e.g. vestibular suppressants) or they may affect the underlying disease process (e.g. calcium channel antagonists in the case of vestibular migraine). Most of these agents, particularly those that are sedating, also have a potential to modulate the rate of compensation for vestibular damage. This consideration has become more relevant in recent years, as vestibular rehabilitation physical therapy is now often recommended in an attempt to promote compensation. Accordingly, therapy of vertigo is optimised when the prescriber has detailed knowledge of the pharmacology of medications being administered as well as the precise actions being sought. There are four broad causes of vertigo, for which specific regimens of drug therapy can be tailored. Otological vertigo includes disorders of the inner ear such as Ménière's disease, vestibular neuritis, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and bilateral vestibular paresis. In both Ménière's disease and vestibular neuritis, vestibular suppressants such as anticholinergics and benzodiazepines are used. In Ménière's disease, salt restriction and diuretics are used in an attempt to prevent flare-ups. In vestibular neuritis, only brief use of vestibular suppressants is now recommended. Drug treatments are not presently recommended for BPPV and bilateral vestibular paresis, but physical therapy treatment can be very useful in both. Central vertigo includes entities such as vertigo associated with migraine and certain strokes. Prophylactic agents (L-channel calcium channel antagonists, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-blockers) are the mainstay of treatment for migraine-associated vertigo. In individuals with stroke or other structural lesions of the brainstem or cerebellum, an eclectic approach incorporating trials of vestibular suppressants and physical therapy is recommended. Psychogenic vertigo occurs in association with disorders such as panic disorder, anxiety disorder and agoraphobia. Benzodiazepines are the most useful agents here. Undetermined and ill-defined causes of vertigo make up a large remainder of diagnoses. An empirical approach to these patients incorporating trials of medications of general utility, such as benzodiazepines, as well as trials of medication withdrawal when appropriate, physical therapy and psychiatric consultation is suggested.

A neurobiological approach to acquired nystagmus

The development of animal and mathematical models for several forms of acquired nystagmus has led to more comprehensive knowledge of these disorders. In the best understood forms, such as periodic alternating nystagmus, our range of knowledge includes an animal model, the neurotransmitters involved, and effective treatment. For some other forms, such as downbeat nystagmus, we have an animal model, but reliable treatment is lacking. In other cases, exemplified by acquired pendular nystagmus, we have only a provisional hypothesis for pathogenesis to account for the oscillations, without an animal model, but effective treatment is possible in some patients. The present trend of studying all aspects of the neurobiology of nystagmus, from molecules to behavior, seems to be the best approach to extend our knowledge and to identify new treatments, but much remains to be done.

Evaluation of transdermal scopolamine as treatment for acquired nystagmus

We conducted an unmasked evaluation of transdermal scopolamine in seven patients with acquired nystagmus for whom other treatments had been unsatisfactory. We measured eye speed and visual acuity before and several hours after starting treatment. Median eye speed decreased slightly in three patients but increased in two; no change in visual acuity occurred in any patient. One patient was unable to tolerate the side effects of scopolamine after two hours, but the others continued the scopolamine treatment for 48 hours; only one reported minor improvement. We conclude that transdermal scopolamine is not likely to be an effective treatment of acquired nystagmus. Patients should be monitored during the first few hours of treatment to determine whether vision is improved or made worse and whether side effects occur.

Current neuro-ophthalmic therapies

The clinical characteristics, differential diagnosis, and treatment options are presented for five different categories of neuro-ophthalmic disease. Nystagmus, optic neuritis, diplopia, pseudotumor cerebri, and temporal arteritis, are frequently encountered in neuro-ophthalmic practice. This article focuses on current therapies for these neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Potential differences in approach to pediatric versus adult patients are emphasized.

Surgical treatment in nystagmus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of symmetric recession surgery on all four horizontal rectus muscles in the treatment of patients with congenital motor nystagmus and sensory nystagmus secondary to albinism, dyschromatopsia and degenerative myopia.

METHODS

Prospectively, four patients with a diagnosis of congenital motor nystagmus and eight patients with sensory nystagmus were operated on. The amount of recession was determined according to the ocular alignment of the patients. Electronystagmographic recordings were conducted in every patient pre-operatively and post-operatively, as well as an ophthalmological examination.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients at the time of the first visit was 6.7 +/- 4.2 years (range 9 months to 14 years) and mean age at the time of operation was 8.3 +/- 2.7 years (range 6-14 years). In 8 cases an equal amount of weakening of the four horizontal recti was done, whereas in 2 cases more recession on the lateral recti due to exotropia and in 2 cases more recession on the medial recti due to esotropia was performed. Mean follow-up time was 15.8 months (min. 6 months, max. 28 months). Improvement in visual function was achieved in 7 patients. Amplitude decreased in 9 patients. One patient had a decrease in visual acuity due to progression of her primary macular degeneration. Improvement in head posture was seen in 3 patients and there was no change in the head posture in 2 patients. One patient acquired head posture after surgery. Restriction of motility was seen in none of the patients after surgery in spite of large amounts of recession. Recession of horizontal recti decreased nystagmus amplitude and frequency in 81.8% of patients. Improvement in visual function, measured as an increase in visual acuity in terms of Snellen lines, was achieved in 63.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Symmetric recession of the horizontal rectus muscles is shown to be a successful procedure to perform in nystagmus patients, resulting in an increase in visual acuity and a decrease in nystagmus amplitude and frequency. It is a reliable alternative to the Kestenbaum operation and is easier to perform surgically.

Acquired Nystagmus

Patients with acquired forms of nystagmus may suffer from oscillopsia and blurred vision; abolishing or reducing nystagmus ameliorates these symptoms. Ideally, treatment of nystagmus should be directed against the pathophysiologic mechanism responsible. Identification of nystagmus pattern is important in directing therapy and occasionally requires electronic eye movement recording for precise characterization. Patients with acquired pendular nystagmus, particularly those with multiple sclerosis, often benefit from gabapentin, a drug with few side effects. Scopolamine, clonazepam, and valproate are also useful in some patients. A new drug, memantine, was effective in treating pendular nystagmus in one study, but it has not yet been approved for use in the United States. Periodic alternating nystagmus usually responds to baclofen. Central vestibular nystagmus, including downbeating and upbeating forms, can be treated with baclofen or clonazepam. In some patients, treatment of an underlying condition, such as periodic ataxia, Whipple's disease, and Chiari malformation, abolishes nystagmus and improves vision. If pharmacologic therapy fails, optical devices can be considered in selected patients. Injections of botulinum toxin and surgery to weaken extraocular muscles are prone to induce diplopia and may precipitate plastic-adaptive ocular motor changes that eventually negate the beneficial effect.

Unsatisfactory treatment of acquired nystagmus with retrobulbar injection of botulinum toxin

PURPOSE

We quantified the effects of botulinum toxin injected into the retrobulbar space of patients with acquired nystagmus with prominent vertical or torsional components.

METHODS

We measured binocular eye rotations in three planes before and after injection of botulinum toxin (10, 12.5, or 25 units) into the retrobulbar space of one eye of each of three patients, ages 28 to 37 years, with acquired pendular nystagmus.

RESULTS

Retrobulbar injection of botulinum toxin abolished or reduced all components of the nystagmus in the treated eye in all three patients for about two to three months. The patient who received 25 units developed complete external ophthalmoplegia and blepharoptosis. The other two patients retained some voluntary movements but developed diplopia. In one patient, visual acuity improved from Jaeger 5 to Jaeger 1. In a second patient, filamentary keratitis developed, and visual acuity declined from Jaeger 2 to Jaeger 7; keratitis was a recurrent problem one year after the botulinum toxin injection. In the third patient with predominantly torsional nystagmus, visual acuity was unchanged at Jaeger 2. No patient was pleased with the results, because of blepharoptosis, diplopia, or discomfort (from keratitis), and none elected to repeat the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The side effects of botulinum toxin administered by retrobulbar injection limit its therapeutic value in the treatment of acquired nystagmus. Even smaller doses that do not abolish nystagmus may produce troublesome diplopia.

Treatment of abnormal eye movements that impair vision: strategies based on current concepts of physiology and pharmacology

Certain abnormal eye movements, especially pathological nystagmus, degrade vision and cause illusory motion of the seen environment. These symptoms are due to excessive movement of images of stationary objects on the retina. Recently, the pathophysiology underlying several types of nystagmus and saccadic oscillations was better defined by the development of animal models and by experimental pharmacological studies. Despite this, few reliable therapies are currently available for these abnormal eye movements. In clinical studies, a number of drugs reportedly helped individual patients, but few drugs have been subjected to double-blind trials. An alternative approach to pharmacological suppression of abnormal eye movements is optical stabilization of images on the retina, which is helpful in selected patients. Weakening of the extraocular muscles, using botulinum toxin or surgery, is prone to cause diplopia and may induce plastic-adaptive changes that render the effect temporary. In some patients, treatment of an underlying condition, such as the Arnold-Chiari malformation, reduces nystagmus and improves vision. There is a need for multicenter trials to evaluate systematically potential treatments of abnormal eye movements that impair vision.