Core Electron Topologies in Chemical Compounds: Case Study of Carbon versus Silicon

Reply to Correspondence on "Core Electron Topologies in Chemical Compounds: Case Study of Carbon versus Silicon"

In their Correspondence, von Szentpály, Schwarz, Stoll, and Werner claim that the main conclusions of our Communication previously published in this journal are based on computational artifacts and oversimplified models. We clarify the justification of our simple one-electron model to describe one-electron physics, and refute their criticism based on what they call "computational artifacts." We remind that our main conclusion on the crucial role of qualitative changes in core electron wavefunctions is evidenced not only by wavefunction topologies the complainants cling to, but also by several other physical observables, which remain unrefuted. Hence, the conclusions of our original Communication stand.

Correspondence on "Core Electron Topologies in Chemical Compounds: Case Study of Carbon versus Silicon"

The conclusions of a recent Communication of Yoshida, Raebiger, Shudo, and Ohno published in this journal, that varying core orbital topologies with minuscule negative tails upon bond formation determine the different chemistries of carbon and silicon and affect ionization energies, excitation energies and bond properties of molecules, are now shown to be based on computational artifacts and oversimplified models. The all-electron wave function uniquely determines the observables, while its representation by one-electron orbital products depends on the details of the chosen approximation and therefore need to be considered with great care.