Slow acetylation phenotype in systemic lupus erythematosus

Cigarette smoking, N-acetyltransferase 2 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population

Cigarette smoking may be associated with an increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the underlying mechanism of this association remains unclear. N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) is highly variable and detoxifies aromatic amines, an important class of carcinogens in tobacco smoke. Individuals who possess homozygous polymorphic alleles have a slower rate of metabolic detoxification of aromatic amines. We investigated the relationship of the NAT2 polymorphism to the risk of SLE with special reference to the interaction with cigarette smoking among 152 SLE cases and 427 controls in a female Japanese population. NAT2*4, NAT2*5B, NAT2*6A and NAT2*7B alleles were detected with polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism. Individuals carrying the *4/*4 genotype are rapid acetylators, whereas those with homozygous non-*4 genotypes have a slow acetylator phenotype. Cigarette smoking was associated with an increased risk of SLE (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.46–3.50). The slow acetylator genotype of NAT2 was significantly associated with an increased risk of SLE (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.21–4.52) compared with the rapid acetylator genotype. A gene-environment interaction was suggested, with a combination of the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype and smoking conferring significantly higher risk (OR = 6.44, 95% CI = 3.07–13.52; attributable proportion due to interaction = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.12–0.88), compared with the NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype and no history of smoking. This study suggests that, in this Japanese population, the NAT2 slow acetylator status may be a determinant in susceptibility to SLE.

Acetylator polymorphism in discoid lupus erythematosus

Acetylator phenotype was determined, using sulphamethazine, in 37 patients with histologically confirmed discoid lupus erythematosus, who were free from visceral damage, and in 157 normal control subjects. Twenty patients (54%) and 90 control subjects (57.4%) were slow acetylators (p not significant). Acetylator polymorphism appears not to be related to the risk of developing pure cutaneous discoid lupus erythematosus.

Further evidence for the lack of association between acetylator phenotype and systemic lupus erythematosus

An association between host acetylator phenotype and idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been sought for over a decade, without a definitive result. We have observed that the frequency of the slow acetylator phenotype was similar in 64 patients with idiopathic SLE (38%), 60 healthy volunteers (50%), and 52 non-SLE medical service patients (44%). The slow acetylator phenotype was not more frequent among subgroups of the SLE patients defined by demographic features or specific manifestations of disease. Our results, as well as a majority of previously published results, do not provide evidence for an association between acetylator phenotype and idiopathic SLE.

Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications

The clinical significance of two separate genetic polymorphisms which alter drug metabolism, acetylation and oxidation is discussed, and methods of phenotyping for both acetylator and polymorphic oxidation status are reviewed. Particular reference is made to the dapsone method, which provides a simple means of distinguishing fast and slow - and possibly intermediate - acetylators, and to the sparteine method which allows a clear separation of oxidation phenotypes. Although acetylation polymorphism has been known for some time, definite indications for phenotyping are few. It is doubtful whether acetylator phenotype makes a significant difference to the outcome in most isoniazid treatment regimens, and peripheral neuropathy from isoniazid in slow acetylators is easily overcome by pyridoxine administration. However, in comparison with rapid acetylators, slow acetylators receiving isoniazid have an increased susceptibility to phenytoin toxicity, and perhaps also to carbamazepine toxicity. It is also possible that rapid acetylators receiving isoniazid attain higher serum fluoride concentrations from enflurane and similar anaesthetics than do similarly treated slow acetylators. Thus, when drug interactions of these types are suspected, phenotyping for acetylator status may be advisable. If routine monitoring of serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations is practised, phenotyping of subjects prior to therapy with these agents should not be necessary. Although acetylator phenotype influences serum concentrations of hydralazine, when this drug is given in combination with other drugs acetylator phenotype has not been shown to influence the therapeutic response. Slow acetylator phenotype along with female gender and the presence of HLA-DR antigens appear to be risk factors in the development of hydralazine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Determination of acetylator phenotype may therefore help determine susceptibility to this adverse reaction. In the case of sulphasalazine, adult slow acetylators require a lower daily dose of the drug than fast acetylators in order to maintain ulcerative colitis in remission without significant side effects. It is therefore advisable to determine acetylator phenotype prior to sulphasalazine therapy. Work on the association of acetylation polymorphism with various disease states is also reviewed. It is possible that a higher incidence of bladder cancer is associated with slow acetylation phenotype - especially in individuals exposed to high levels of arylamines. The question as to whether idiopathic SLE is more common in slow acetylators remains unresolved. There appears to be no difference between fa

Drug acetylation and expression of lupus erythematosus

Acetylator phenotype was measure in 58 patients presenting to a skin clinic with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and in 51 normal healthy subjects. Twenty seven of the patients with DLE were found to have evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (D+SLE). Frequency of slow acetylator phenotype was 58% in all DLE patients, 52% in those with D+SLE and was no different from the 57% in controls. The distribution of acetylator phenotypes within the groups with DLE and those with D+SLE was similar to controls. Severity of DLE was assessed as number of skin lesions and median lesion count was 11.5 in slow acetylators and 10 in fast acetylators but in D+SLE median lesion count was 22 in slow acetylators and 12 in fast acetylators, and there was a significant inverse relationship between lesion count and rate of acetylation; scores for systemic involvement showed no relationship. We conclude that there is no difference in the frequency or distribution of slow acetylator phenotype between normal subjects and patients with DLE with or without SLE but that actual rate of acetylation may determine severity of expression of the disease in slow acetylators.

Survey of the human acetylator polymorphism in spontaneous disorders

There is ample evidence that the human acetylator phenotypes are associated with drug induced phenomena. It is principally the slow acetylators who exhibit toxic adverse effects because of their relative inability to detoxify the original drug compounds. In rare instances, however, it is the rapid acetylators who are at a disadvantage. In the matter of association of spontaneous disease with either acetylator phenotype, there are two groups of disorders to consider. First, disorders in which carcinogenic amines are known to be an aetiological factor. This is because these amines are substrates for the polymorphic N-acetyltransferase activity and hence there is a possible rational basis for searching for an association. Secondly, other disorders where searches for associations are based more on hunches. In the first group there is a definite statistical association between cancer of the bladder and the slow acetylator phenotype. In prevalence studies the slow phenotype is 39% more associated with bladder cancer than is the rapid phenotype. On the basis of the evidence now available it is not possible to say whether this association is because slow acetylators develop the disease more frequently or whether they survive longer. In the second group the relevant studies show (1) a greatly increased prevalence of slow acetylators in Gilbert's disease; (2) a confirmed association between the rapid acetylator phenotype and diabetes; (3) a possible association between the rapid acetylator phenotype and breast cancer; (4) a possible association between the slow acetylator phenotype and leprosy in Chinese patients; (5) an earlier age of onset of thyrotoxicosis (Graves' disease) in slow acetylators than in rapid acetylators; (6) no evidence of an association between either phenotype and spontaneous systemic lupus erythematosus.

Aromatic amines and the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus

The acetylation pathway of drug metabolism is the pathway by which aromatic amines and hydrazines are metabolized. Hydralazine and procainamide are aromatic amines or hydrazines that are metabolized by this pathway. Persons who are genetically slow acetylators are predisposed to development of lupus from these two drugs, suggesting that the free amine or hydrazine moiety is the inciting agent. When acetylprocainamide was given as an antiarrhythmic drug to patients with procainamide-induced lupus, the disease went into remission, indicating that the free amine group on procainamide had induced the disease. The genetic acetylator phenotypes of persons with idiopathic lupus were studied, and an excess of genetic slow acetylators was observed. This suggests amines or hydrazines induce some cases of this disease. One patient was identified with a lupus-like illness due to occupational exposure to hydrazine itself.

Isoniazid disposition, comparison of isoniazid phenotyping methods in and acetylator distribution of Japanese patients with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus and control subjects

1 Plasma levels of isoniazid (INH) and acetyl INH in plasma were measured with a spectrofluorometric method, and INH and its metabolites (acetyl INH, mono-acetylhydrazine, diacetylhydrazine and free hydrazine) excreted in urine were measured with a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, respectively, after an oral dose of INH 10 mg/kg in 19 Japanese patients with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in the same number of healthy controls. 2 When phenotyped according to various methods previously reported, 16 to 18 of the SLE and 17 to 19 of the control group were rapid acetylators. Regardless of the phenotyping methods applied, the distribution of acetylator phenotype of SLE patients was not significantly different from the control group or from the data previously reported among normal Japanese population. 3 By phenotyping our subjects with an INH T 1/2 of 110 min or less as rapid acetylators, and more slow acetylators, 3 of SLE patients and 2 of the controls were slow, while the remainder were all rapid. When this antimode was used, the mean apparent kinetic variables of INH and acetyl INH estimated from the plasma concentration-time data and the mean values for the 24-h urinary amount of INH and its metabolites, except for monoacetylhydrazine (P less than 0.05), did not significantly differ between the rapid acetylators of SLE and control groups. 4 The distribution of INH T 1/2, acetyl INH to INH ratios in plasma and urine, values in urine for log10 (diacetylhydrazine to monoacetylhydrazine) and for diacetylhydrazine to INH or acetyl INH was similar between the two groups except for one patient who was definitely classified as a slow acetylator regardless of whichever phenotyping methods were used. The excretory patterns of hydrazine compounds reflect, in general, the inactivating ability of INH in each individual. 5 The data suggest that phenotyping by using plasma samples is, in general, better than by using urine samples. The plasma T 1/2 alone is the most satisfactory criterion. 6 We conclude that neither INH disposition nor phenotype distribution assessed by the reported methods using INH as the test compound are altered in idiopathic SLE, and that a search for racial and/or geographical factor(s) likely to result in autoimmune disease may give a clue to the pathogenesis in addition to further exploration for the possible interrelation between idiopathic SLE and genetic slow acetylation.

Acetylator phenotype and metabolic disposition of isoniazid in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Acetylator phenotype and metabolic disposition of isoniazid (INH) were studied in 19 Japanese (a population shown to be 11.5% slow acetylators) patients with spontaneous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 19 healthy controls. Subjects with the elimination half-life (t1/2) of INH of 2.0 hours or less were considered rapid and those of 2.2 hours or more were slow acetylators. Results of phenotyping showed that 17 of 19 SLE patients were rapid, 1 slow, and 1 indeterminate, whereas 18 of the controls were rapid and 1 indeterminate. When phenotyped according to another reported antimode (107 or 110 minutes), 3 of the patients and 2 of the controls were slow and the remainder were all rapid acetylators. The distribution of INH t1/2, acetyl INH to INH ratios in urine and plasma, and hydrazine compounds in urine measured with gas chromatography mass spectrometry was similar between the two groups, except for 1 patient who was definitely classified as a slow acetylator. The relationship between phenotype distribution and possible pathoetiologic factors is discussed.

Acetylator phenotype and lupus erythematosus

There are several known therapeutic implications of acetylator phenotype; among them, the association of a higher incidence of procainamide- and hydralazine-induced lupus in slow acetylators. Presumably, this is because acetylation of the aromatic amine or hydrazine functional group leads to a non-toxic product. Several other drugs which have been implicated in drug-induced lupus also contain an aromatic amine or hydrazine group. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of drug-induced and idiopathic lupus are similar but the degree to which the pathophysiological mechanisms are related, if at all, is unknown. There is also evidence reported for an association between the slow acetylator phenotype and idiopathic lupus. If true, this relationship should provoke some new experimental approaches to investigation into the mechanism of idiopathic lupus.

Acetylator phenotype in idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus

The acetylator phenotypes of 21 patients from New York City and 29 patients from Israel with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were determined with dapsone or isoniazid. Thirty were slwo acetylators, 17 were rapid, and 3 indeterminate. These cases plus published studies of acetylator phenotypes in idiopathic SLE show a worldwide distribution of 150 slow to 77 rapid instead of the expected 122:105 (P less than 0.001). The relationship between acetylator phenotype and possible etiologic agents is discussed.