Development of antinuclear antibody in patients treated with high doses of captopril

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis in antihypertensive drug users

PURPOSE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are effective in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Next to effects on hypertension and cardiac function, these drugs have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties which may either facilitate or protect against the development of autoimmunity, potentially resulting in autoimmune diseases. Therefore, we determined in the current study the association between ACE inhibitor and ARB use and incident rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A matched case-control study was conducted among patients treated with antihypertensive drugs using the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice (LINH) database in 2001-2006. Cases were patients with a first-time diagnosis of RA. Each case was matched to five controls for age, sex, and index date, which was selected 1 year before the first diagnosis of RA. ACE inhibitor and ARB exposure was considered to be any prescription issued in the period before index date. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our study included 211 cases and 667 matched controls. After controlling for potential confounders, ever use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs was not associated with incident RA (adjusted ORs [95%CI], 0.99 [0.55-1.79] and 1.02 [0.67-1.56], respectively). The adjusted ORs (95%CI) for current and past use of ACE inhibitors were 1.18 (0.75-1.85) and 0.61 (0.28-1.35). For current and past use of ARBs, these adjusted ORs (95%CI) were 1.40 (0.80-2.45) and 0.29 (0.05-1.67), respectively. No duration and dose-effect relationship was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ACE inhibitor or ARB use is not associated with incident RA.

Metabolism of drugs by leukocytes

Neutrophils and monocytes can metabolize drugs to reactive metabolites, especially those drugs that have nitrogen or sulfur in a low oxidation state. The major system involved in this oxidation is the combination of NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase which generates HOCl. Although this system is unlikely to be quantitatively important, i.e. it is unlikely to have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of a drug, the reactive metabolites produced appear to have significant biological effects. Reactive metabolites, by their very nature, have short half-lives, and most of their effects will be exerted on the cells that formed them. Therefore, they are likely to be important for adverse reactions that involve leukocytes, such as agranulocytosis and immune-mediated reactions. However, the mechanism of these reactions is unknown and evidence for the association of leukocyte-derived reactive metabolites with such reactions is circumstantial at present. There is also circumstantial evidence to link the formation of such reactive metabolites to the antiinflammatory effects of some drugs. Possible mechanisms include the scavenging of other reactive species or inhibition of cells, especially neutrophils and macrophages, involved in inflammation. The oxidation of drugs by leukocytes requires activation of the cells; therefore, infection or other inflammatory conditions that activate leukocytes may represent one of the risk factors for idiosyncratic drug reactions.

Granulocytopenia after combined therapy with interferon and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: evidence for a synergistic hematologic toxicity

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether granulocytopenia observed in 3 of 38 patients with essential mixed cryoglobulinemia who were treated with low-dose interferon was due to the underlying disease or to synergistic toxicity of interferon with other drugs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adverse effects of interferon therapy were monitored in 38 patients affected with type II essential mixed cryoglobulinemia. Patients were treated with 3 million units (MU), daily or on alternate days, of recombinant interferon-alpha 2a (35 patients) or with natural interferon-beta (3 patients). The duration of treatment ranged between 6 and 15 months; the total duration of follow-up, including after therapy, ranged between 8 and 93 months.

RESULTS

None of 35 patients treated with interferon alone developed significant hematologic alterations. In addition, none of 7 patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors alone showed hematologic toxicity. Three patients who were treated with a combination of interferon and ACE inhibitors developed severe granulocytopenia a few days after starting treatment. Granulocytopenia subsided within 1 to 2 weeks after suspending therapy. Resumption of treatment with this drug combination produced a granulocytopenia relapse in 1 patient. In these 3 patients, interferon treatment alone, or ACE inhibitor monotherapy, was not followed by granulocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Although severe hematologic toxicity rarely develops in patients treated with low-dose interferon, granulocytopenia occurred in all 3 of our patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia who were treated with a combination of low-dose interferon-alpha 2a and ACE inhibitors. Neither drug alone was toxic in any of our cryoglobulinemic patients, indicating a high risk of severe hematologic toxicity for this drug combination, at least in patients with this disease. Physicians should be aware of this danger when using interferon treatment in patients with this, or possibly other, disorder(s) that also require antihypertensive therapy.

The role of leukocyte-generated reactive metabolites in the pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug reactions

Evidence strongly suggests that many adverse drug reactions, including idiosyncratic drug reactions, involve reactive metabolites. Furthermore, certain functional groups, which are readily oxidized to reactive metabolites, are associated with a high incidence of adverse reactions. Most drugs can probably form reactive metabolites, but a simple comparison of covalent binding in vitro is unlikely to provide an accurate indication of the relative risk of a drug causing an idiosyncratic reaction because it does not provide an indication of how efficiently the metabolite is detoxified in vivo. In addition, the incidence and nature of adverse reactions associated with a given drug is probably determined in large measure by the location of reactive metabolite formation, as well as the chemical reactivity of the reactive metabolite. Such factors will determine which macromolecules the metabolites will bind to, and it is known that covalent binding to some proteins, such as those in the leukocyte membrane, is much more likely to lead to an immune-mediated reaction or other type of toxicity. Some reactive metabolites, such as acyl glucuronides, circulate freely and could lead to adverse reactions in almost any organ; however, most reactive metabolites have a short biological half-life, and although small amounts may escape the organ where they are formed, these metabolites are unlikely to reach sufficient concentrations to cause toxicity in other organs. Many idiosyncratic drug reactions involve leukocytes, especially agranulocytosis and drug-induced lupus. We and others have demonstrated that drugs can be metabolized by activated neutrophils and monocytes to reactive metabolites. The major reaction appears to be reaction with leukocyte-generated hypochlorous acid. Hypochlorous acid is quite reactive, and therefore it is likely that many other drugs will be found that are metabolized by activated leukocytes. Some neutrophil precursors contain myeloperoxidase and the NADPH oxidase system, and it is likely that these cells can also oxidize drugs. Therefore, although there is no direct evidence, it is reasonable to speculate that reactive metabolites generated by activated leukocytes, or neutrophil precursors in the bone marrow, could be responsible for drug-induced agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia. This could involve direct toxicity or an immune-mediated reaction. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and it may be that both mechanisms contribute to the toxicity, even in the same patient. In the case of drug-induced lupus, a prevalent hypothesis for lupus involves modification of class II MHC antigens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a comparative review

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and dosages of the three currently available angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reviewed. This class of agents effectively inhibits the conversion of angiotensin I to the active vasoconstrictor angiotensin II, a hormone that also promotes, via aldosterone stimulation, increased sodium and water retention. The ACE inhibitors, therefore, are capable of lowering blood pressure primarily by promoting vasodilatation and reducing intravascular fluid volume. Captopril, the first orally active, commercially available ACE inhibitor, is a sulfhydryl-containing compound. Captopril was followed by the introduction of enalapril and lisinopril, two non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitors. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these three ACE inhibitors differ. Captopril has rapid onset with relatively short duration of action, whereas enalapril and lisinopril have slower onset and relatively long duration of action. Captopril is an active ACE inhibitor in its orally absorbable parent form. In contrast, enalapril must be deesterified in the liver to the metabolite enalaprilat in order to inhibit the converting enzyme; this accounts for its delayed onset of action. Lisinopril does not require metabolic activation to be effective; however, a slow and incomplete absorption pattern explains the delay in onset of activity. Captopril and its disulfide metabolites are primarily excreted in the urine with minor elimination in the feces. Approximately two-thirds of an administered enalapril dose is excreted in the urine as both the parent drug and the metabolite enalaprilat; the remainder of these two substances are excreted in the feces. Lisinopril does not undergo measurable metabolism and approximately one-third is excreted unchanged in the urine with the remaining parent drug being excreted in the feces. The ACE inhibitors lower systemic vascular resistance with a resultant decrease in blood pressure. Their efficacy is comparable to diuretics and beta-blockers in treating patients with mild, moderate, or severe essential and renovascular hypertension. In those patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) the ACE inhibitors produce a reduction in systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure. These drugs may produce improvement in cardiac output and stroke volume and, with chronic administration, may promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. The antihypertensive effects of the ACE inhibitors are enhanced when these agents are combined with a diuretic. Captopril and enalapril have been shown to be of particular benefits as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure, both in terms of subjective improvement of patient symptoms, and in improving overall hemodynamic status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Drug metabolism by leukocytes and its role in drug-induced lupus and other idiosyncratic drug reactions

This review presents a unifying hypothesis that provides a connection between several types of hypersensitivity reactions associated with several types of drugs and explains some of the therapeutic effects (antiinflammatory activity and antithyroid effects) of these same drugs. This hypothesis centers on the oxidation of these drugs to chemically reactive metabolites by peroxidases. The drugs of interest have functional groups that are easily oxidized. The major peroxidase involved in this hypothesis is MPO because of its critical location in leukocytes which play a key role in the function of the immune system. However, thyroid peroxidase can probably also oxidize many of the same drugs to reactive metabolites, and this may be responsible for the thyroid autoimmunity observed in connection with some hypersensitivity reactions. Peroxidases have also been described in the skin and in platelets, and their presence may be responsible for the high incidence of skin reactions in the hypersensitivity response and the occurrence of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, respectively. Involvement of other peroxidases, such as prostaglandin peroxidase, may also be important for antiinflammatory effects of drugs. In addition, leukocytes contain prostaglandin synthetase, and the activation of leukocytes leads to the release of arachidonic acid and the production of prostaglandins. This process may also lead to the metabolism of drugs to reactive metabolites. In studies of the metabolism of procainamide and dapsone, aspirin and indomethacin did not inhibit the formation of the hydroxylamine by neutrophils and mononuclear leukocytes. This is evidence against the involvement of prostaglandin synthetase in these oxidation; however, preliminary studies with other drugs suggest that prostaglandin synthetase may contribute to the metabolism of some drugs by leukocytes. Furthermore, the metabolism of phenylbutazone, phenytoin, and tenoxicam, as well as our preliminary work with other drugs such as carbamazepine, suggests that the range of drugs that are metabolized to reactive metabolites by peroxidases may be broader than initially suspected. There are several other drugs that do not fit into the functional group classes covered in this review but have similar properties. A good example is alpha-methyldopa, which is associated with drug-induced lupus, immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, and other hypersensitivity reactions. Such drugs may also be metabolized to reactive metabolites by peroxidases. Another aspect of the hypothesis is that an infection, or other inflammatory condition, may be an important risk factor for a hypersensitivity reaction because such a stimulus leads to activation of leukocytes which can lead to formation of reactive metabolites from certain drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

There is convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, alone or in combination with a diuretic, effectively lower blood pressure in patients with all grades of essential or renovascular hypertension and that they are of particular benefit as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The hemodynamic, hormonal and clinical effects of the presently available ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, are comparable and their side effect profiles are extremely favorable. One important difference between the two oral ACE inhibitors, however, is their pharmacokinetics; enalapril's action is slower to begin and is of longer duration. Compared with other agents, ACE inhibitors offer important advantages, among them an improved feeling of well being. It is, therefore, expected that ACE inhibitors will gain greater acceptance by patients and physicians in the future.

Adverse reactions with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Teprotide, a nonapeptide isolated from the venom of a Brazilian pit viper, Bothrops jararaca, was the first angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to be discovered and tested. It was found to be an effective, non-toxic antihypertensive agent as well as an afterload-reducing agent for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The primary activity of teprotide resulted from blockade of the angiotensin I converting enzyme--the pivotal step in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and consequent reductions in angiotensin II levels. There was limited clinical testing for teprotide because of: its scarcity; the need for parenteral administration; and the subsequent discovery and synthesis of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Captopril is the prototype oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and has been extensively studied since the initiation of formal studies in 1976. Perhaps one of the most closely researched drugs in modern times, the experience with captopril now includes more than 12,000 patients studied in formalized trials and over 4,000,000 patients treated world-wide by physicians for hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril (MK421) is the first of what appears to be a growing number of analogues which are structurally and pharmacodynamically different from captopril; yet, they possess the same capacity for inhibiting the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme. The side effect profile of enalapril (and presumably future) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors appears to be similar to captopril, though clearly more experience is needed with newer agents. The initial use of captopril was troubled by a relatively high incidence of side effects which will form the focus of this discussion. Partially the result of incomplete pharmacokinetic information, captopril was administered in early studies at dosages now recognised to be far in excess of those necessary for drug action. In addition, dosages were given without regard for deficiencies of renal function, now known to be the main excretory route of captopril. The population of those patients studied frequently had chronic, treatment-resistant hypertension, often associated with concomitant end-organ disease (especially renal disease); and many additional factors further complicating the clinical setting, e.g. a relatively high incidence of collagen vascular disease and immunosuppressive treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Drug-induced lupus. Genetic, clinical, and laboratory features

Drug-induced lupus is a disorder similar to idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus in terms of manifestations. However, these entities have significant serologic and clinical differences, which call into question the concept that they represent an identical disease process. Nonetheless, further research into the drug-induced disease will enhance our understanding and management of this clinically significant iatrogenic disease and will likely contribute to our comprehension of the pathogenesis of autoimmunity.

Binding and activation of the first complement component by soluble immune complexes: effect of complex size and composition

The interaction between soluble immune complexes and the first component of complement (C1) was studied. Complexes were prepared from purified bovine thyroglobulin (BTg) or tetanus toxoid (TT) and immunospecific IgG antibodies. Purified human precursor C1 was incubated with dilutions of the preparations, and the inhibition of C1 haemolytic activity was determined as a measure of C1-binding. The activation of C1 was assessed by measuring the amount of C4 consumed by generated C1. The molar antibody/antigen (Ab/Ag) ratio of BTg--anti-BTg mixtures strongly influenced their C1-binding and C1-activating capacities: mixtures with high Ab/Ag ratios were by far the most efficient. On the other hand, the Ab/Ag ratio had only a limited influence on the activity of TT--anti-TT complexes. The effect of complex size was investigated by ultracentrifugation of antibody-antigen mixtures on calibrated sucrose density gradients followed by C1-binding and -activation experiments with the fractions obtained. For both types of immune complex, the C1-binding and -activating capacities increased markedly with increasing complex size. Thus, both the size and the Ab/Ag ratio of soluble immune complexes influence their capacity to activate the classical complement pathway. The effect of the Ab/Ag ratio, however, may also be dependent on the antigen molecule(s) present in the complexes.