1
|
Miyashiro M, Asano T, Ishii Y, Miyazaki C, Shimizu H, Masuda J. Treatment Patterns of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: A Claims-Based Cohort Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2024; 11:285-297. [PMID: 38598110 PMCID: PMC11176134 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports on treatment patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice are still sparse in Japan, especially in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns of bDMARD/JAKi in the treatment of RA in real-world clinical practice in Japan. METHOD A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Japanese Medical Data Vision health claims database. The inclusion criteria required a recorded diagnosis of RA, defined by ICD-10 codes, in patients aged 18 years and older on the index date. We analyzed 39,903 RA patients treated with DMARDs from 2008 to 2020. RESULTS Among analyzed subjects, 10,196 patients (25.6%) were prescribed bDMARDs/JAKi in combination with csDMARDs, and 3067 patients (7.7%) were prescribed these drugs without csDMARDs. Among the bDMARDs/JAKi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were the most commonly prescribed DMARD overall, and also the most common first-line therapy, accounting for 60.0% or 45.5% of patients prescribed these drugs in combination with or without csDMARDs, respectively. Switching, temporary discontinuation (restarting with the same agents), and discontinuation of bDMARDs/JAKi were observed in 3150 (30.9%), 1379 (13.5%), and 2025 (19.9%) patients with csDMARDs, and in 849 (27.7%), 513 (16.7%), and 833 (27.2%) patients without csDMARDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Real-world treatment trajectories of bDMARDs/JAKi with and without csDMARDs was analyzed in RA patients in Japan between 2008 and 2020. TNFi were the predominant first-line therapy, and likely to be switched to different classes. Understanding the current treatment patterns, including discontinuation, is important to find an optimal treatment strategy for RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Miyashiro
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Teita Asano
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan.
| | - Yutaka Ishii
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Celine Miyazaki
- Value, Evidence and Access Department, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Hirohito Shimizu
- Medical Affairs Division, Medical Excellence Department, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Junya Masuda
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gul H, Di Matteo A, Anioke I, Shuweidhi F, Mankia K, Ponchel F, Emery P. Predicting Flare in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic Induced Remission, on Tapering, and on Stable Therapy. ACR Open Rheumatol 2024; 6:294-303. [PMID: 38411023 PMCID: PMC11089437 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The tapering of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b-DMARD) therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in stable remission is frequently undertaken, but specific guidance on how to successfully taper is lacking. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of flare in patients in stable b-DMARD-induced clinical remission, who did or did not follow structured b-DMARD tapering. METHODS Patients with RA receiving b-DMARD treatment who had achieved sustained remission according to a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 for ≥6 months were offered tapering. Clinical, ultrasound (US) (total power Doppler [PD]/grayscale abnormalities), CD4+ T cell subsets, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at inclusion. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of flare (loss of DAS28-CRP remission) over 12 months. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of flare. Dichotomization into high/low-risk groups was based on 80% specificity using the area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC). RESULTS Of 63 patients choosing tapering, 23 (37%) flared compared with 12 of 60 (20%) on stable treatment (P = 0.043). All patients who flared regained remission upon reinstating treatment. In the tapering group, flare was associated with lower regulatory T cell (Treg) (P < 0.0001) and higher CRP levels (P < 0.0001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P < 0.035), and inflammation-related cells (IRCs) (P = 0.054); stepwise modeling selected Tregs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.350, P = 0.004), IRCs (OR = 1.871, P = 0.007), and CRP level (OR = 1.577, P = 0.004) with 81.7% accuracy and AUROC = 0.890. In the continued therapy group, modeling retained the tender joint count, total PD, and visual analog scale pain score, with 82.1% accuracy and AUROC = 0.899. Most patients in the study were considered low risk of flare (80 of 123 patients [65%]). Only 5 of 37 (13.5%) of the low-risk patients who tapered flared, which was notable compared with the continued therapy group (20% flare). CONCLUSION Flare on tapering b-DMARDs was predicted by lower Tregs and elevated inflammation biomarkers (IRCs/CRP level); flare on continued b-DMARDs was associated with raised pain parameters and US inflammation. Knowledge of these biomarkers should improve outcomes by targeted selection for tapering, and by increased monitoring of those on continued therapy predicted to flare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Di Matteo
- University of Leeds and National Institute for Health and Care Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | | | | | - Kulveer Mankia
- University of Leeds and National Institute for Health and Care Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | | | - Paul Emery
- University of Leeds and National Institute for Health and Care Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kay J, Nikolov NP, Weisman MH. American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting May 17-18, 2022. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024. [PMID: 38622107 DOI: 10.1002/art.42864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kay
- UMass Chan Medical School and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Nikolay P Nikolov
- Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Matteo A, Bathon JM, Emery P. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2023; 402:2019-2033. [PMID: 38240831 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01525-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune inflammatory disease that mainly affects the joints and periarticular soft tissues. In this Seminar, we provide an overview of the main aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology and advances in the understanding of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis will be reviewed. We will discuss the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, classification criteria, and the value of imaging in the diagnosis of the disease. The advent of new medications and the accumulated scientific evidence demand continuous updating regarding the diagnosis and management, including therapy, of rheumatoid arthritis. An increasing number of patients are now able to reach disease remission. This major improvement in the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been determined by a combination of different factors (eg, early diagnosis, window of opportunity, treat-to-target strategy, advent of targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and combination therapy). We will discuss the updated recommendations of the two most influential societies for rheumatology worldwide (ie, the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, controversies (ie, the role of glucocorticoids in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and safety profile of Janus kinase inhibitors) and outstanding research questions, including precision medicine approach, prevention, and cure of rheumatoid arthritis will be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Matteo
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Joan M Bathon
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Emery
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward MM, Madanchi N, Yazdanyar A, Shah NR, Constantinescu F. Prevalence and predictors of sustained remission/low disease activity after discontinuation of induction or maintenance treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic and scoping review. Arthritis Res Ther 2023; 25:222. [PMID: 37986101 PMCID: PMC10659063 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the prevalence of sustained remission/low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), separately in induction treatment and maintenance treatment studies, and to identify predictors of successful discontinuation. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review of studies published from 2005 to May 2022 that reported outcomes after TNFi discontinuation among patients in remission/LDA. We computed prevalences of successful discontinuation by induction or maintenance treatment, remission criterion, and follow-up time. We performed a scoping review of predictors of successful discontinuation. RESULTS Twenty-two induction-withdrawal studies were identified. In pooled analyses, 58% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45, 70) had DAS28 < 3.2 (9 studies), 52% (95% CI 35, 69) had DAS28 < 2.6 (9 studies), and 40% (95% CI 18, 64) had SDAI ≤ 3.3 (4 studies) at 37-52 weeks after discontinuation. Among patients who continued TNFi, 62 to 85% maintained remission. Twenty-two studies of maintenance treatment discontinuation were also identified. At 37-52 weeks after TNFi discontinuation, 48% (95% CI 38, 59) had DAS28 < 3.2 (10 studies), and 47% (95% CI 33, 62) had DAS28 < 2.6 (6 studies). Heterogeneity among studies was high. Data on predictors in induction-withdrawal studies were limited. In both treatment scenarios, longer duration of RA was most consistently associated with less successful discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-half of patients with RA remain in remission/LDA for up to 1 year after TNFi discontinuation, with slightly higher proportions in induction-withdrawal settings than with maintenance treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Ward
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10CRC, Room 4-1339, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1468, USA.
| | - Nima Madanchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Current address: Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ali Yazdanyar
- Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest, Allentown, PA, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Current address: Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nehal R Shah
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lillegraven S, Paulshus Sundlisæter N, Aga AB, Sexton J, Olsen IC, Lexberg ÅS, Madland TM, Fremstad H, Høili CA, Bakland G, Spada C, Haukeland H, Hansen IM, Moholt E, Uhlig T, Solomon DH, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA. Effect of tapered versus stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: a randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1394-1403. [PMID: 37607809 PMCID: PMC10579188 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) require treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to reach remission. It is debated whether tapering of TNFi to discontinuation should be considered in sustained remission. The aim of ARCTIC REWIND TNFi was to assess the effect of tapering TNFi to withdrawal compared with stable treatment on the risk of disease activity flares in patients with RA in remission ≥1 year. METHODS This randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial was undertaken at nine Norwegian rheumatology departments. Patients with RA in remission ≥12 months on stable TNFi therapy were allocated by computer-based block-randomisation to tapering to discontinuation of TNFi or stable TNFi. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic co-medication was unchanged. The primary endpoint was disease flare during the 12-month study period (non-inferiority margin 20%), assessed in the per-protocol population. RESULTS Between June 2013 and January 2019, 99 patients were enrolled and 92 received the allocated treatment strategy. Eighty-four patients were included in the per-protocol population. In the tapering TNFi group, 27/43 (63%) experienced a flare during 12 months, compared with 2/41 (5%) in the stable TNFi group; risk difference (95% CI) 58% (42% to 74%). The tapering strategy was not non-inferior to continued stable treatment. The number of total/serious adverse events was 49/3 in the tapering group, 57/2 in the stable group. CONCLUSION In patients with RA in remission for more than 1 year while using TNFi, an increase in flare rate was reported in those who tapered TNFi to discontinuation. However, most regained remission after reinstatement of full-dose treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS EudraCT: 2012-005275-14 and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01881308.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Lillegraven
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna-Birgitte Aga
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joseph Sexton
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge Christoffer Olsen
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tor Magne Madland
- Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hallvard Fremstad
- Department of Rheumatology, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | | | - Gunnstein Bakland
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cristina Spada
- Department of Rheumatology, Revmatismesykehuset AS, Lillehammer, Norway
| | - Hilde Haukeland
- Department of Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Sandvika, Norway
| | | | - Ellen Moholt
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Till Uhlig
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel H Solomon
- Division of Rheumatology, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Désirée van der Heijde
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tore K Kvien
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen A Haavardsholm
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Esveld L, Cox JM, Kuijper TM, Bosch TM, Weel-Koenders AE. Cost-utility analysis of tapering strategies of biologicals in rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Netherlands. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1296-1306. [PMID: 37423648 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current guidelines recommend tapering biological disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) if the disease is under control. However, guidelines on tapering are lacking. Assessing cost-effectiveness of different tapering strategies might provide broader input for creating guidelines on how to taper bDMARDs in patients with RA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective of bDMARD tapering strategies in Dutch patients with RA, namely 50% dose reduction (tapering), discontinuation and a 50% dose reduction followed by discontinuation (de-escalation). METHODS Using a societal perspective, a Markov model with a life-time horizon of 30 years was used to simulate 3-monthly transitions between Disease Activity 28 (DAS28)-defined health states of remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.63.2). Transition probabilities were estimated through literature search and random effects pooling. Incremental costs, incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental net monetary benefits for each tapering strategy were compared with continuation. Deterministic, probabilistic sensitivity analyses and multiple scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS After 30 years, the ICERs were €115 157/QALY lost, €74 226/QALY lost and €67 137/QALY lost for tapering, de-escalation and discontinuation, respectively; mainly driven by bDMARD cost savings and a 72.8% probability of a loss in quality of life. This corresponds to a 76.1%, 64.3% and 60.1% probability of tapering, de-escalation and discontinuation being cost-effective, provided a willingness-to-accept threshold of €50 000/QALY lost. CONCLUSIONS Based on these analyses, the 50% tapering approach saved the highest cost per QALY lost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juul M Cox
- Hospital Pharmacy, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, MaasstadLab Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tessa M Bosch
- Hospital Pharmacy, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, MaasstadLab Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique Eam Weel-Koenders
- Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ringold S, Dennos AC, Kimura Y, Beukelman T, Shrader P, Phillips TA, Kohlheim M, Schanberg LE, Yeung RSM, Horton DB. Disease Recapture Rates After Medication Discontinuation and Flare in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: An Observational Study Within the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:715-723. [PMID: 35921198 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with well-controlled juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) frequently experience flares after medication discontinuation, but the outcomes of these flares have not been well described. The objective of this study was to characterize the rates and predictors of disease recapture among children with JIA who restarted medication to treat disease flare. METHODS Children with JIA who discontinued conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for well-controlled disease but subsequently experienced a flare and restarted medication were identified from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry. The primary outcome was inactive disease (ID) (physician global assessment <1 and active joint count = 0) 6 months after flare. RESULTS A total of 333 patients had complete data for ID at 6 months after flare. The recapture rate for the cohort was 55%, ranging from 47% (persistent oligoarthritis) to 69% (systemic arthritis) (P = 0.4). Approximately 67% of children achieved ID by 12 months. In the multivariable model, history and reinitiation of biologic drugs were associated with increased odds of successful recapture (odds ratio [OR] 4.79 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.22-18.78] and OR 2.74 [95% CI 1.62-4.63], respectively). Number of joints with limited range of motion was associated with decreased odds (OR 0.83 per 1 joint increase [95% CI 0.72-0.95]). CONCLUSION Approximately half of JIA flares post-discontinuation were recaptured within 6 months, but rates of recapture varied across JIA categories. These findings inform shared decision-making for patients, families, and clinicians regarding the risks and benefits of medication discontinuation. Better understanding of biologic predictors of successful recapture in JIA are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yukiko Kimura
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Melanie Kohlheim
- Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Parent/Patient Partner
| | | | - Rae S M Yeung
- Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaban N, Harman H. Paradigm guiding to tapering or discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a local prospective study. Int J Rheum Dis 2023; 26:689-698. [PMID: 36807751 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We prospectively conduct the current study to figure out predicting factors whether biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) can be discontinued or tapered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population encompassed 126 consecutive RA patients on b/tsDMARDs for at least 1 year. Remission was defined as a Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28) - erythrocyte sedimentation rate <2.6. The b/tsDMARD dosing interval was increased in patients in remission for at least 6 months. In patients in whom the b/tsDMARD dosing interval could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the b/tsDMARD was stopped at the end of this period. Disease relapse was defined as deterioration from remission to moderate or high disease activity. RESULTS The mean duration of b/tsDMARD treatment for all patients was 2.54 ± 1.55 years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. Independent predictors for tapering in b/tsDMARD treatment are no switch to another therapy and lower baseline DAS28 scores (respectively, P = .029, .024). Time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients requiring corticosteroids when the 2 groups were compared with the log-rank test (2.83 vs 10.8 months; P = .05). CONCLUSION It seems a reasonable approach to consider b/tsDMARD tapering in patients with remission period of >3.5 months, lower baseline DAS28 scores and without requiring corticosteroid use. Unfortunately, no predictor has been found to predict b/tsDMARD discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nedim Kaban
- Department of Rheumatology, Çanakkale Mehmet Akif Ersoy State Hospital, Çanakkale, Turkey
| | - Halil Harman
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meng CF, Rajesh DA, Jannat-Khah DP, Jivanelli B, Bykerk VP. Can Patients With Controlled Rheumatoid Arthritis Taper Methotrexate From Targeted Therapy and Sustain Remission? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:36-47. [PMID: 35970524 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the risk of not being able to sustain remission after tapering methotrexate (MTX) from targeted therapy in patients with controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting remission outcomes after tapering MTX from targeted therapies in RA. Full-text articles and abstracts reported in English were included. Metaanalyses were conducted using random-effects models. Forest and funnel plots were created. RESULTS A total of 10 articles were included. Studies evaluated MTX being tapered from combination treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept, and tofacitinib. A total of 9 studies used a randomized design and 1 was observational. Out of 10 studies, 3 focused on early RA (ie, < 1 yr). The MTX-tapering strategy was gradual in 2 studies and rapid in 8 studies. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 18 months in randomized trials and up to 3 years in the observational study. Our metaanalysis, which included 2000 participants with RA from 10 studies, showed that patients who tapered MTX from targeted therapy had a 10% reduction in the ability to sustain remission and an overall pooled risk ratio of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.97). There was no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.94). Our funnel plot indicated minimal publication bias. CONCLUSION Patients with controlled RA may taper MTX from targeted therapy with a 10% reduction in the ability to sustain remission for up to 18 months. Longer follow-up studies with attention to radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes are needed. The risk of disease worsening should be discussed with the patient with careful follow-up and prompt retreatment of disease worsening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis F Meng
- C.F. Meng MD, V.P. Bykerk, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College.
| | - Diviya A Rajesh
- D.A. Rajesh, BA, Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Deanna P Jannat-Khah
- D.P. Jannat-Khah, DRPH, MSPH, Division of Rheumatology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics CORE, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College
| | - Bridget Jivanelli
- B. Jivanelli, MLIS, Kim Barrett Memorial Library, HSS Education Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- C.F. Meng MD, V.P. Bykerk, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Birkner B, Rech J, Edelmann E, Verheyen F, Schett G, Stargardt T. Patient-individual tapering of DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a real-world setting. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:1476-1484. [PMID: 35980267 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to provide real-world evidence on the effectiveness of patient-individual tapering of DMARDs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice using medical records and claims data. METHODS We utilize data obtained through a controlled prospective cohort study in Germany conducted from July 2018 to March 2021. Participants consist of RA patients in sustained remission (>6 months) who were eligible for tapering at enrolment. Patients treated with individual tapering based on shared decision making (n = 200) are compared with patients without any dose-reduction (n = 237). The risk of loss of remission and the risk of flare is assessed with risk-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox-Regressions. We evaluate differences in costs one year before and after baseline based on claims data for the subgroup of patients insured at one major sickness fund in Germany (n = 76). RESULTS The risk of flare (HR 0.88 95%-CI: 0.59-1.30) or loss of remission (HR 1.04 95%-CI: 0.73, 1.49) was not statistically different between the individual tapering group and the continuation group. Minor increases of disease activity and decreases of quality of life were observed 12 months after baseline, again with no statistically significant difference. Drug costs decreased by 1,017€in the individual tapering group while increased by 1,151€in the continuation group (p< 0.01). CONCLUSION Individual tapering of DMARDs does not increase the average risk of experiencing flares or loss of remission. Encouraging rheumatologists and patients to apply tapering in shared decision may be a feasible approach to allow individualisation of treatment in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Birkner
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Rech
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tom Stargardt
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kashiwado Y, Kiyohara C, Kimoto Y, Nagano S, Sawabe T, Oryoji K, Mizuki S, Nishizaka H, Yoshizawa S, Yoshizawa S, Tsuru T, Inoue Y, Ueda N, Ota SI, Suenaga Y, Miyamura T, Tada Y, Niiro H, Akashi K, Horiuchi T. Clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who continue or discontinue biologic therapy after hospitalization for infection: a retrospective observational study. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:131. [PMID: 35650638 PMCID: PMC9158270 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02820-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To analyse the subsequent clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who either continued or discontinued biologic agents after hospitalization for infections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 230 RA patients with 307 hospitalizations for infections under biologic therapy between September 2008 and May 2014 in 15 institutions for up to 18 months after discharge. The risks of RA flares and subsequent hospitalizations for infections from 61 days to 18 months after discharge were evaluated. Results Survival analyses indicated that patients who continued biologic therapy had a significantly lower risk of RA flares (31.4% vs. 60.6%, P < 0.01) and a slightly lower risk of subsequent infections (28.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that discontinuation of biologic therapy, diabetes, and a history of hospitalization for infection under biologic therapy were associated with RA flares. Oral steroid therapy equivalent to prednisolone 5 mg/day or more and chronic renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for subsequent hospitalizations for infections. Conclusions Discontinuation of biologic therapy after hospitalization for infections may result in RA flares. Continuation of biologic therapy is preferable, particularly in patients without immunodeficiency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02820-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kashiwado
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan
| | - Chikako Kiyohara
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Kimoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan
| | - Shuji Nagano
- Department of Rheumatology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan
| | - Takuya Sawabe
- Department of Rheumatology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kensuke Oryoji
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Shinichi Mizuki
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nishizaka
- Department of Rheumatology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Seiji Yoshizawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yoshizawa
- Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomomi Tsuru
- Department of Rheumatology, Med.Co. LTA PS Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Inoue
- Department of Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naoyasu Ueda
- Department of Rheumatology and Infection, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shun-Ichiro Ota
- Department of Rheumatology, Internal medicine and connective tissue disorders, Shimonoseki City Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan
| | - Yasuo Suenaga
- Department of Rheumatology, Beppu Medical Center, NHO, Beppu, Japan
| | - Tomoya Miyamura
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Tada
- Department of Rheumatology, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Niiro
- Department of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koichi Akashi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takahiko Horiuchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Versteeg GA, Ten Klooster PM, van de Laar MAFJ. Fatigue is associated with disease activity in some, but not all, patients living with rheumatoid arthritis: disentangling "between-person" and "within-person" associations. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:3. [PMID: 34991729 PMCID: PMC8739670 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00230-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous research has shown an unclear and inconsistent association between fatigue and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to explore differences in “between-person” and “within-person” associations between disease activity parameters and fatigue severity in patients with established RA. Methods Baseline and 3-monthly follow-up data up to one-year were used from 531 patients with established RA randomized to stopping (versus continuing) tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment enrolled in a large pragmatic trial. Between- and within-patient associations between different indicators of disease activity (C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], swollen and tender joint count [ SJC and TJC], visual analog scale general health [VAS-GH]) and patient-reported fatigue severity (Bristol RA Fatigue Numerical Rating Scale) were disaggregated and estimated using person-mean centering in combination with repeated measures linear mixed modelling. Results Overall, different indices of disease activity were weakly to moderately associated with fatigue severity over time (β’s from 0.121 for SJC to 0.352 for VAS-GH, all p’s < 0.0001). Objective markers of inflammation (CRP, ESR and SJC) were associated weakly with fatigue within patients over time (β’s: 0.104–0.142, p’s < 0.0001), but not between patients. The subjective TJC and VAS-GH were significantly associated with fatigue both within and between patients, but with substantially stronger associations at the between-patient level (β’s: 0.217–0.515, p’s < 0.0001). Within-person associations varied widely for individual patients for all components of disease activity. Conclusion Associations between fatigue and disease activity vary largely for different patients and the pattern of between-person versus within-person associations appears different for objective versus subjective components of disease activity. The current findings explain the inconsistent results of previous research, illustrates the relevance of statistically distinguishing between different types of association in research on the relation between disease activity and fatigue and additionally suggest a need for a more personalized approach to fatigue in RA patients. Trial registration Netherlands trial register, Number NTR3112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grada A Versteeg
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. box. 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. box. 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. box. 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Defining the Optimal Strategies for Achieving Drug-Free Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9121726. [PMID: 34946453 PMCID: PMC8701994 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is now accepted that the optimum treatment goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is sustained remission, as this has been shown to be associated with the best patient outcomes. There is little guidance on how to manage patients once remission is achieved; however, it is recommended that patients can taper therapy, with a view to discontinuing and achieving drug-free remission if treatment goals are maintained. This narrative review aims to present the current literature on drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis, with a view to identifying which strategies are best for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) tapering and to highlight areas of unmet clinical need. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature, which included research articles, meta-analyses and review papers. The key search terms included were rheumatoid arthritis, remission, drug-free remission, b-DMARDS/biologics, cs-DMARDS and tapering. The databases that were searched included PubMed and Google Scholar. For each article, the reference section of the paper was reviewed to find additional relevant articles. Results: It has been demonstrated that DFR is possible in a proportion of RA patients achieving clinically defined remission (both on cs and b-DMARDS). Immunological, imaging and clinical associations with/predictors of DFR have all been identified, including the presence of autoantibodies, absence of Power Doppler (PD) signal on ultrasound (US), lower disease activity according to composite scores of disease activity and lower patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) at treatment cessation. Conclusions: DFR in RA may be an achievable goal in certain patients. This carries importance in reducing medication-induced side-effects and potential toxicity, the burden of taking treatment if not required and cost effectiveness, specifically for biologic therapy. Prospective studies of objective biomarkers will help facilitate the prediction of successful treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
|
15
|
O'Neil LJ, Hu P, Liu Q, Islam MM, Spicer V, Rech J, Hueber A, Anaparti V, Smolik I, El-Gabalawy HS, Schett G, Wilkins JA. Proteomic Approaches to Defining Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Immunol 2021; 12:729681. [PMID: 34867950 PMCID: PMC8636686 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.729681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) are increasingly achieving stable disease remission, yet the mechanisms that govern ongoing clinical disease and subsequent risk of future flare are not well understood. We sought to identify serum proteomic alterations that dictate clinically important features of stable RA, and couple broad-based proteomics with machine learning to predict future flare. Methods We studied baseline serum samples from a cohort of stable RA patients (RETRO, n = 130) in clinical remission (DAS28<2.6) and quantified 1307 serum proteins using the SOMAscan platform. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and supervised classification were applied to identify proteomic-driven clusters and model biomarkers that were associated with future disease flare after 12 months of follow-up and RA medication withdrawal. Network analysis was used to define pathways that were enriched in proteomic datasets. Results We defined 4 proteomic clusters, with one cluster (Cluster 4) displaying a lower mean DAS28 score (p = 0.03), with DAS28 associating with humoral immune responses and complement activation. Clustering did not clearly predict future risk of flare, however an XGboost machine learning algorithm classified patients who relapsed with an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.80 using only baseline serum proteomics. Conclusions The serum proteome provides a rich dataset to understand stable RA and its clinical heterogeneity. Combining proteomics and machine learning may enable prediction of future RA disease flare in patients with RA who aim to withdrawal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam J O'Neil
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba and Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Pingzhao Hu
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Md Mohaiminul Islam
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Victor Spicer
- Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba and Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Juergen Rech
- Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg and Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Axel Hueber
- Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg and Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vidyanand Anaparti
- Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba and Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Irene Smolik
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Hani S El-Gabalawy
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba and Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg and Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - John A Wilkins
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba and Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Uhrenholt L, Christensen R, Dinesen WKH, Liboriussen CH, Andersen SS, Dreyer L, Schlemmer A, Hauge EM, Skrubbeltrang C, Taylor PC, Kristensen S. Risk of flare after tapering or withdrawal of b-/tsDMARDs in patients with RA or axSpA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3107-3122. [PMID: 34864896 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate flare risk when tapering or withdrawing biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-/tsDMARDs) compared to continuation in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) in sustained remission or low disease activity. METHODS Articles were identified in Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Eligible trials were randomised, controlled trials comparing tapering and/or withdrawal of b- and/or tsDMARDs with standard dose in IA. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with risk ratio (RR), or Peto's Odds Ratio (POR) for sparse events, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS The meta-analysis comprised 22 trials: 11 assessed tapering and 7 addressed withdrawal (4 assessed both). Only trials with a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) population were identified. An increased flare risk was demonstrated when b-/tsDMARD tapering was compared to continuation, RR = 1.45 (95%CI: 1.19 to 1.77, I2 = 42.5%), and potentially increased for persistent flare, POR = 1.56 (95%CI: 0.97 to 2.52, I2 = 0%). Comparing tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) withdrawal to continuation, a highly increased flare risk (RR = 2.28, 95%CI: 1.78 to 2.93, I2 = 78%) and increased odds of persistent flare (POR = 3.41, 95%CI: 1.91 to 6.09, I2 = 49%) was observed. No clear difference in flare risk between RA or axSpA was observed. CONCLUSION A high risk for flare and persistent flare was demonstrated for TNFi withdrawal whereas an increased risk for flare but not for persistent flare was observed for b-/tsDMARD tapering. Thus, tapering seems to be the more favourable approach. REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42019136905).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Uhrenholt
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Stine S Andersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Annette Schlemmer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Conni Skrubbeltrang
- Department of Medical Library, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Incidence of and Reasons and Determinants Associated with Retransitioning from Biosimilar Etanercept to Originator Etanercept. BioDrugs 2021; 35:765-772. [PMID: 34704199 PMCID: PMC8613120 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00501-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients in clinical practice are transitioned from originator etanercept (OR-ETA) to biosimilar etanercept (BS-ETA), but some subsequently retransition. Insights into the incidence of and reasons for retransitioning and the characteristics of these patients could help clinicians successfully introduce biosimilars. Objective Our objective was to assess the incidence of and reasons for retransitioning from BS-ETA to OR-ETA in patients with a rheumatic disease (RD) and to explore the determinants thereof. Methods This cohort study included all patients with RD who had transitioned from OR-ETA to BS-ETA in a large hospital in the Netherlands in 2016. The incidence of retransitioning to OR-ETA and the 1-year persistence with BS-ETA were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Reasons for retransitioning were classified as related to (1) efficacy, (2) adverse events, (3) the administration device, and (4) other. Determinants for retransitioning, including baseline and treatment characteristics, were assessed in a nested case–control study using conditional logistic regression. Results We included 342 patients (median age 57.8 years; 53.5% females). At 1 year after transitioning, 9.4% of patients had retransitioned to OR-ETA and 69.7% were persistent with BS-ETA. At the end of follow-up (median 4.4 years), 47 patients (13.7%) had retransitioned to OR-ETA. The median time until retransitioning was 0.55 years (interquartile range 0.2–1.3). Most patients (n = 34 [72.3%]) retransitioned because of a (perceived) loss of effect, followed by adverse events (23.4%). In total 3.8% of patients switched to another biological treatment or a Janus kinase inhibitor; 17.1% of patients discontinued BS-ETA without retransitioning or switching within the first year. Univariate determinants for retransitioning included initiating corticosteroids or intensifying immunomodulator treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–5.45) and the number of visits to the rheumatology department (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.55–2.74). In the multivariate analysis, only the number of visits to the rheumatology department remained significantly associated with retransitioning (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.60–3.01). Conclusion When introducing a biosimilar in clinical care, clinicians should anticipate that one in seven patients will retransition to the originator. A (perceived) loss of effect was the most frequently reported reason for retransitioning. Patients who visited the rheumatology department more frequently had an increased risk of retransitioning, which is likely to be related to patients reporting a loss of effect and to adverse events resulting in more visits to the rheumatology department. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00501-x.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bertrand D, Stouten V, De Cock D, Pazmino S, Doumen M, de Wergifosse I, Joly J, Badot V, Corluy L, Hoffman I, Taelman V, De Knop K, Geens E, Langenaken C, Lenaerts JL, Lenaerts J, Walschot M, Mannaerts J, Westhovens R, Verschueren P. Tapering of Etanercept is feasible in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in sustained remission: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:470-480. [PMID: 34514929 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1955467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission, tapering of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs can be considered. Tapering has already been investigated, but its feasibility remains to be determined. Therefore, we explored the feasibility of tapering etanercept in RA in a setting close to practice.Method: Patients with RA in 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission (≥ 6 months) and treated with etanercept 50 mg weekly (≥ 1 year) were included in the pragmatic 1 year open-label multicentre randomized controlled TapERA (Tapering Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial. Patients were assigned to continue etanercept weekly or to taper to every other week (EOW). Patients who lost remission [DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 2.6] were re-escalated to etanercept weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining DAS28-CRP remission for 6 months.Results: Sixty-six patients were randomized to etanercept weekly (n = 34) or EOW (n = 32). After 6 months, 26/34 patients (76%) in the weekly and 19/32 (59%) in the EOW group maintained disease control (p = 0.136). In the EOW group, 20/32 patients (63%) remained on their tapered treatment during the trial. Two patients reintroduced weekly etanercept themselves. Ten patients were re-escalated to etanercept weekly by the rheumatologist, after a median (interquartile range) interval of 3.0 (2.0-6.0) months. Among these patients, 7/10 regained remission after re-escalation, four of them at the next study visit.Conclusions: Although non-inferiority could not be demonstrated, tapering of etanercept to EOW appeared feasible in patients in sustained remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bertrand
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Stouten
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D De Cock
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Pazmino
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Doumen
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium.,Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - J Joly
- Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Badot
- Rheumatology, CHU Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Corluy
- Rheumatology, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Belgium
| | - I Hoffman
- Rheumatology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - V Taelman
- Rheumatology, Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K De Knop
- Rheumatology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - E Geens
- Rheumatology, ZNA Jan Palfijn Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | | | - J Lenaerts
- Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - J Mannaerts
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Westhovens
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium.,Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Verschueren
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium.,Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Maassen JM, van Ouwerkerk L, Allaart CF. Tapering of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: an overview for daily practice. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2021; 3:e659-e670. [PMID: 38287612 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00224-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
In this Review, we discuss the possibility of drug tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity, for glucocorticoids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. We review international guidelines and recommendations, as well as remaining uncertainties, and provide an overview of the current literature. Three strategies of tapering are discussed: (1) tapering by discontinuation of one of the drugs in combination therapy regimens, (2) tapering by reducing the dose of one of the drugs in combination therapy regimens, and (3) tapering by dose reduction of monotherapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. We discuss the outcomes and robustness of evidence of trials and observational cohorts, and we give a trajectory for further research and drug tapering in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lotte van Ouwerkerk
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jung SY, Koh JH, Kim KJ, Park YW, Yang HI, Choi SJ, Lee J, Choi CB, Kim WU. Switching from TNFα inhibitor to tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in rheumatoid arthritis after achieving low disease activity with TNFα inhibitors and methotrexate: 24-week result from a non-randomized, prospective, active-controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2021; 23:182. [PMID: 34233727 PMCID: PMC8265052 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02566-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tapering or stopping biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has been proposed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission, but it frequently results in high rates of recurrence. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) as maintenance therapy in patients with established RA in remission after receiving combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and methotrexate (MTX). Methods This 24-week, prospective, open-label trial included patients who received TNFi and MTX at stable doses for ≥24 weeks and had low disease activity (LDA), measured by Disease Activity Score-28 for ≥12 weeks. Patients selected one of two arms: maintenance (TNFi plus MTX) or switched (TAC plus MTX). The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients maintaining LDA at week 24, which was assessed using a logistic regression model. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study period. Results In efficacy analysis, 80 and 34 patients were included in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively. At week 24, LDA was maintained in 99% and 91% of patients in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–1.59). Drug-related adverse effects tended to be more common in the switched arm than in the maintenance arm (20.9% versus 7.1%, respectively) but were well-tolerated. Conclusion This controlled study tested a novel treatment strategy of switching from TNFi to TAC in RA patients with sustained LDA, and the findings suggested that TNFi can be replaced with TAC in most patients without the patients experiencing flare-ups for at least 24 weeks. Trial registration Korea CDC CRIS, KCT0005868. Registered 4 February 2021—retrospectively registered Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02566-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Youn Jung
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jung Hee Koh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki-Jo Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong-Wook Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Hyung-In Yang
- College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Jae Choi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chan-Bum Choi
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wan-Uk Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Center for Integrative Rheumatoid Transcriptomics and Dynamics, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, St.Clair EW, Arayssi T, Carandang K, Deane KD, Genovese M, Huston KK, Kerr G, Kremer J, Nakamura MC, Russell LA, Singh JA, Smith BJ, Sparks JA, Venkatachalam S, Weinblatt ME, Al-Gibbawi M, Baker JF, Barbour KE, Barton JL, Cappelli L, Chamseddine F, George M, Johnson SR, Kahale L, Karam BS, Khamis AM, Navarro-Millán I, Mirza R, Schwab P, Singh N, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Yaacoub S, Akl EA. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021; 73:924-939. [PMID: 34101387 PMCID: PMC9273041 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 345] [Impact Index Per Article: 115.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional). CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana Fraenkel
- Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joan M. Bathon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Bryant R. England
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and VA Nebraska–Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Genovese
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Kent Kwas Huston
- The Center for Rheumatic Disease/Allergy and Immunology, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Gail Kerr
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Georgetown and Howard University, Washington, DC
| | - Joel Kremer
- Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York
| | | | | | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Benjamin J. Smith
- State University College of Medicine School of Physician Assistant Practice, Tallahassee
| | - Jeffrey A. Sparks
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Joshua F. Baker
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jennifer L. Barton
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | - Sindhu R. Johnson
- Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lara Kahale
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | - Reza Mirza
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pascale Schwab
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | | | - Elie A. Akl
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, St Clair EW, Arayssi T, Carandang K, Deane KD, Genovese M, Huston KK, Kerr G, Kremer J, Nakamura MC, Russell LA, Singh JA, Smith BJ, Sparks JA, Venkatachalam S, Weinblatt ME, Al-Gibbawi M, Baker JF, Barbour KE, Barton JL, Cappelli L, Chamseddine F, George M, Johnson SR, Kahale L, Karam BS, Khamis AM, Navarro-Millán I, Mirza R, Schwab P, Singh N, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Yaacoub S, Akl EA. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:1108-1123. [PMID: 34101376 DOI: 10.1002/art.41752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 300] [Impact Index Per Article: 100.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional). CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana Fraenkel
- Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Joan M Bathon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
| | - Bryant R England
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Genovese
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Kent Kwas Huston
- The Center for Rheumatic Disease/Allergy and Immunology, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
| | - Gail Kerr
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Georgetown and Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Joel Kremer
- Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York, United States
| | | | - Linda A Russell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Benjamin J Smith
- Florida State University College of Medicine School of Physician Assistant Practice, Tallahassee
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Michael E Weinblatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Joshua F Baker
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Kamil E Barbour
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Laura Cappelli
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | | | | | - Sindhu R Johnson
- Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lara Kahale
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | - Reza Mirza
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pascale Schwab
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | | | - Marat Turgunbaev
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | | | - Elie A Akl
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baker KF, Sim JPX, Isaacs JD. Biomarkers of tolerance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a new era in clinical management? THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2021; 3:e371-e382. [PMID: 38279392 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00069-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Modern therapeutic agents and treatment regimens have made sustained remission an attainable target for many patients across a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, albeit at the risk of adverse events and the expense of drug prescription and safety monitoring. Clinicians and patients are thus increasingly faced with a novel treatment dilemma: whether and how best to stop immunomodulatory treatment in patients who achieve remission. In this final paper in a Series on therapeutic tolerance induction, we summarise our current knowledge of biomarkers of immune homeostasis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and their application to the prediction and attainment of sustained drug-free remission. We summarise evidence from prospective studies of immunomodulatory drug cessation across a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We also consider current evidence for clinical, serological, proteomic, metabolomic, cellular, and microbiomic biomarkers of immune homeostasis. Finally, we discuss the steps necessary for clinical translation of these biomarkers, as well as the potential transformative effect of these biomarkers on management of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases if clinical translation is successfully achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth F Baker
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jasmine P X Sim
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John D Isaacs
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Mulligen E, Ahmed S, Weel AEAM, Hazes JMW, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, de Jong PHP. Factors that influence biological survival in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a real-world academic cohort from the Netherlands. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40:2177-2183. [PMID: 33415451 PMCID: PMC8121743 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05567-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We aim to explore real-world biological survival stratified for discontinuation reason and determine its influenceability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Data from the local pharmacy database and patient records of a university hospital in the Netherlands were used. RA patients who started a biological between 2000 and 2020 were included. Data on age, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) status, presence of erosions, gender, body mass index, time to first biological, biological survival time, use of csDMARDs, and discontinuation reasons were collected. Of the included 318 patients, 12% started their first biological within 6 months after diagnosis. The median time to first biological was 3.6 years (95% CI, 1.0–7.2). The median survival of the first- and second-line biological was respectively 1.7 years (95% CI, 1.3–2.2) and 0.8 years (95% CI, 0.5–1.0) (p = 0.0001). Discontinuation reasons for the first-line biological were ineffectiveness (47%), adverse events (17%), remission (16%), pregnancy (30%), or patient preference (10%). Multivariable Cox regression analyses for discontinuation due to inefficacy or adverse events showed that concomitant use of csDMARDs (HR = 1.32, p < 0.001) positively while RF positivity negatively (HR = 0.82, p = 0.03) influenced biological survival. ACPA positivity was associated with the inability to discontinue biologicals after achieving remission (HR = 1.43, p = 0.023). Second-line TNF inhibitor survival was similar between patients with a primary and secondary non-response on the first-line TNF inhibitor (HR = 1.28, p = 0.34). Biological survival diminishes with the number of biologicals used. Biological survival is prolonged if patients use csDMARDs. RF was negatively associated with biological survival. ACPA was negatively associated with the inability to discontinue biologicals after achieving remission. Therefore, tailoring treatment based upon autoantibody status might be the first step towards personalized medicine in RA.Key Points • Prolonged biological survival is a surrogate for treatment effectiveness; however, an increasing amount of patients will taper treatment due to remission, and factors influencing biological survival based on separate reasons for discontinuation have not been explored. • We found that combining a biological DMARD with a conventional synthetic DMARD increases biological DMARD survival. Rheumatoid factor is negatively associated with biological survival. Anti-citrullinated protein antibody is negatively associated with the inability to discontinue the biological when remission was reached. • The first step towards personalized medicine might be tailoring of treatment based upon autoantibody status. |
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise van Mulligen
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Saad Ahmed
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Angelique E A M Weel
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Room Na-523, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Naniwa T, Iwagaitsu S, Kajiura M. Successful cessation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients and potential predictors for early flare: An observational study in routine clinical care. Mod Rheumatol 2020; 30:948-958. [DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2019.1702253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Taio Naniwa
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya City University Hospital, and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
- Takeuchi Orthopedics & Internal Medicine, Chita, Japan
| | - Shiho Iwagaitsu
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Mulligen E, Weel AE, Hazes JM, van der Helm-van Mil A, de Jong PHP. Tapering towards DMARD-free remission in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results of the TARA trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:1174-1181. [PMID: 32482645 PMCID: PMC7456559 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the 2-year clinical effectiveness of two gradual tapering strategies. The first strategy consisted of tapering the conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) first (i.e., methotrexate in ~90%), followed by the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-inhibitor), the second strategy consisted of tapering the TNF-inhibitor first, followed by the csDMARD. METHODS This multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled trial included patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with well-controlled disease for ≥3 consecutive months, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) measured in 44 joints ≤2.4 and a swollen joint count ≤1, which was achieved with a csDMARD and a TNF-inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering the csDMARD followed by the TNF-inhibitor, or vice versa. The primary outcome was the number of disease flares. Secondary outcomes were DMARD-free remission (DFR), DAS, functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) and radiographic progression. RESULTS 189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering their csDMARD (n=94) or TNF-inhibitor (n=95) first. The cumulative flare rate after 24 months was, respectively, 61% (95% CI 50% to 71%) and 62% (95% CI 52% to 72%). The patients who tapered their csDMARD first were more often able to go through the entire tapering protocol and reached DFR more often than the group that tapered the TNF-inhibitor first (32% vs 20% (p=0.12) and 21% vs 10% (p=0.07), respectively). Mean DAS and HAQ-DI over time, and radiographic progression did not differ between groups (p=0.45, p=0.17, p=0.8, respectively). CONCLUSION The order of tapering did not affect flare rates, DAS or HAQ-DI. DFR was achievable in 15% of patients with established RA, slightly more frequent in patients that first tapered csDMARDs. Because of similar effects from a clinical viewpoint, financial arguments may influence the decision to taper TNF-inhibitors first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelique E Weel
- Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - J M Hazes
- Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Annette van der Helm-van Mil
- Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schlager L, Loiskandl M, Aletaha D, Radner H. Predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:324-334. [PMID: 31325305 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review possible predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in RA patients in remission or low disease activity. METHODS MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library were scanned for studies that discontinued b/tsDMARDs in remission/low disease activity and searched for predictors of successful discontinuation. Additionally, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were hand searched. RESULTS Thirty-four studies with a total of 5724 patients were included. Predictors of successful b/tsDMARD discontinuation were (number of studies): low disease activity (n = 13), better physical function (n = 6), low or absence of rheumatoid factor (n = 5) or ACPA (n = 3), low levels of CRP (n = 3) or ESR (n = 3), shorter disease duration (n = 3), low signals of disease activity by ultrasound (n = 3). Only one study with high risk of bias was identified on tsDMARD discontinuation. CONCLUSION Several predictors of successful bDMARD discontinuation were identified. Although studies are heterogeneous, these predictors may inform clinical decision making in patients who are considered for a potential bDMARD discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schlager
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Loiskandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helga Radner
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van Vollenhoven R, McInnes IB, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, de Wit M, Falzon L, Landewé R. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:744-759. [PMID: 32033937 PMCID: PMC7286044 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform the 2019 update of the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A systematic literature research (SLR) to investigate the efficacy of any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) (conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD, biological (b) and biosimilar DMARD, targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD) or glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in patients with RA was done by searching MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 2016 and 8 March 2019. RESULTS 234 abstracts were selected for detailed assessment, with 136 finally included. They comprised the efficacy of bDMARDs versus placebo or other bDMARDs, efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi) across different patient populations and head-to-head of different bDMARDs versus JAKi or other bDMARDs. Switching of bDMARDs to other bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, strategic trials and tapering studies of bDMARDs, csDMARDs and JAKi were assessed. The drugs evaluated included abatacept, adalimumab, ABT-122, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, SBI-087, CNTO6785, decernotinib, etanercept, filgotinib, golimumab, GCs, GS-9876, guselkumab, hydroxychloroquine, infliximab, leflunomide, mavrilimumab, methotrexate, olokizumab, otilimab, peficitinib, rituximab, sarilumab, salazopyrine, secukinumab, sirukumab, tacrolimus, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, tregalizumab, upadacitinib, ustekinumab and vobarilizumab. The efficacy of many bDMARDs and tsDMARDs was shown. Switching to another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi bDMARDs after TNFi treatment failure is efficacious. Tapering of DMARDs is possible in patients achieving long-standing stringent clinical remission; in patients with residual disease activity (including patients in LDA) the risk of flares is increased during the tapering. Biosimilars are non-inferior to their reference products. CONCLUSION This SLR informed the task force regarding the evidence base of various therapeutic regimen for the development of the update of EULAR's RA management recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Mulligen E, Weel AEAM, Kuijper TM, Hazes JMW, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, de Jong PHP. The impact of a disease flare during tapering of DMARDs on the lives of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:423-431. [PMID: 32224045 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the impact of a disease flare on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, who are tapering treatment. METHODS Data were used from the TARA trial; a multicenter, randomized controlled trial in which RA patients, with a well-controlled disease (DAS≤2.4 and SJC≤1) for at least 6 months, gradually tapered their DMARDs. PROMs of patients with a flare (DAS>2.4 and/or SJC>1) were compared every three months before and after a flare with their own norm values. Linear Mixed Models were used to investigate whether a disease flare influenced functional ability (HAQ-DI), fatigue (BRAF-MDQ), quality of life (EQ-5D and SF36), anxiety and depression (HADS), morning stiffness, general health (GH) and worker productivity, and if so, the duration was determined. For unemployment and sick leave we used descriptive statistics. RESULTS A flare negatively influenced GH, morning stiffness, HAQ-DI, EQ-5D, BRAF-MDQ, and the SF36 physical component scale and this effect lasted >3 months. Except for the HAQ-DI, effect sizes exceeded the minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs). For the physical outcomes effects lasted >6 months. Worker productivity was not significantly affected by a flare. CONCLUSION A disease flare influenced patients' lives, the largest effect was seen in the physical outcomes, and lasted 6 months. Although on a group level effect sizes for the separate PROMs were not always significant or larger than specific MCIDs, a disease flare can still be of great importance for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E van Mulligen
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - A E A M Weel
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T M Kuijper
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Re-establishment of efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral JAK inhibitor, after temporary discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2127-2137. [PMID: 32048083 PMCID: PMC7295730 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04956-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction/objective Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of temporary discontinuation and reinitiation of tofacitinib on disease control in patients with RA in the vaccine sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study ORAL Sequel (NCT00413699). Methods The sub-study of ORAL Sequel was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label study. Patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for ≥ 3 months in ORAL Sequel were randomized to receive continuous (tofacitinib monotherapy/with methotrexate) or interrupted (tofacitinib withdrawn for 2 weeks post-randomization then reinitiated as monotherapy/with methotrexate) treatment. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 response rates, change from baseline (∆) in C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Global Assessment of arthritis (PtGA), Pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and Physician Global Assessment of arthritis (PGA). Safety was assessed throughout. Results The sub-study included 99 patients each in the continuous and interrupted treatment groups. ACR20/50 response rates, ∆CRP, ∆HAQ-DI (day 15), ∆DAS28-4 (ESR), ∆CDAI, ∆PtGA, ∆Pain (VAS), and ∆PGA were significantly worse in interrupted vs continuous patients during dose interruption, but were generally similar to pre-interruption/continuous treatment levels 28 days post-reinitiation. A numerically higher proportion of interrupted patients reported adverse events (49.5%) vs continuous patients (35.4%). Conclusions Tofacitinib efficacy can be re-established after temporary withdrawal and reinitiation. The safety profile of patients who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib in the sub-study was consistent with previous tofacitinib LTE studies over 9 years. Clinical trial registration number NCT00413699Key Points • In this sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study, ORAL Sequel, the efficacy of tofacitinib was re-established after temporary withdrawal (2 weeks) and reinitation of treatment in patients with RA. • Patients with RA who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib had similar safety events to those reported in previous LTE studies. • The results of this sub-study were consistent with a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two LTE studies, ORAL Sequel and A3921041, which assessed the efficacy of tofacitinib following a treatment discontinuation period of 14–30 days. |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lamers-Karnebeek FBG, Jacobs JWG, Radstake TRDJ, van Riel PLCM, Jansen TL. Adalimumab drug and antidrug antibody levels do not predict flare risk after stopping adalimumab in RA patients with low disease activity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 58:427-431. [PMID: 30383251 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish whether serum adalimumab (ADA) trough level (ADA-TL) and antidrug antibody (ADA-ab) level predict flare after stopping ADA in established RA patients with long-standing low disease activity. METHODS From the clinical trial Potential Optimalisation and Effectiveness of TNF-blockers, 210 RA patients stopping ADA, who had been using ADA (40 mg/2 weeks) for >1 year with conventional synthetic DMARDs and who had low disease activity (DAS28 < 3.2, or the rheumatologist's assessment of low disease activity with CRP < 10 mg/l) for at least 6 months prior to stopping, were followed for 1 year. The ADA-TL was measured (by ELISA) 12-17 days after the last ADA injection; if it was low, ADA-abs were measured (by an antigen-binding test). Association between time-to-flare and ADA-TL was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 106 (51%) patients flared within 1 year after stopping ADA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for flare and ADA-TL was 0.50 (95% CI 0.42-0.58), P = 0.92. The hazard ratio for flare for ADA-TL ⩾ 5 μg/ml (adequate level) vs <5 μg/ml was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.63-1.36) (not significant). Of the 4 patients with high ADA-ab levels, 2 patients (50%) experienced a flare. CONCLUSION Flare risk within the year following stopping ADA is not predicted by the ADA-TL or ADA-abs assessed at the moment of stopping. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, http://www.trialregister.nl, NTR3112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johannes W G Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy R D J Radstake
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Piet L C M van Riel
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim L Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology, Viecuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brahe CH, Krabbe S, Østergaard M, Ørnbjerg L, Glinatsi D, Røgind H, Jensen HS, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Jacobsen S, Terslev L, Huynh TK, Jensen DV, Manilo N, Asmussen K, Brown Frandsen P, Boesen M, Rastiemadabadi Z, Morsel Carlsen L, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. Dose tapering and discontinuation of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine care - 2-year outcomes and predictors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:110-119. [PMID: 30169706 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives A cohort of routine care RA patients in sustained remission had biological DMARD (bDMARDs) tapered according to a treatment guideline. We studied: the proportion of patients whose bDMARD could be successfully tapered or discontinued; unwanted consequences of tapering/discontinuation; and potential baseline predictors of successful tapering and discontinuation. Methods One-hundred-and-forty-three patients (91% receiving TNF inhibitor and 9% a non-TNF inhibitor) with sustained disease activity score (DAS28-CRP)⩽2.6 and no radiographic progression the previous year were included. bDMARD was reduced to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half after 16 weeks, and discontinued after 32 weeks. Patients who flared (defined as either DAS28-CRP ⩾ 2.6 and ΔDAS28-CRP ⩾ 1.2 from baseline, or erosive progression on X-ray and/or MRI) stopped tapering and were escalated to the previous dose level. Results One-hundred-and-forty-one patients completed 2-year follow-up. At 2 years, 87 patients (62%) had successfully tapered bDMARDs, with 26 (18%) receiving two-thirds of standard dose, 39 (28%) half dose and 22 (16%) having discontinued; and 54 patients (38%) were receiving full dose. ΔDAS28-CRP0-2yrs was 0.1((-0.2)-0.4) (median (interquartile range)) and mean ΔTotal-Sharp-Score0-2yrs was 0.01(1.15)(mean(s.d.)). Radiographic progression was observed in nine patients (7%). Successful tapering was independently predicted by: ⩽1 previous bDMARD, male gender, low baseline MRI combined inflammation score or combined damage score. Negative IgM-RF predicted successful discontinuation. Conclusion By implementing a clinical guideline, 62% of RA patients in sustained remission in routine care were successfully tapered, including 16% successfully discontinued at 2 years. Radiographic progression was rare. Maximum one bDMARDs, male gender, and low baseline MRI combined inflammation and combined damage scores were independent predictors for successful tapering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Simon Krabbe
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lykke Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Henrik Røgind
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Hanne S Jensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annette Hansen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Tuan K Huynh
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Dorte V Jensen
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Brown Frandsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Zoreh Rastiemadabadi
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lone Morsel Carlsen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jakob M Møller
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVE Achieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany. METHODS Following a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus. RESULTS The results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.
Collapse
|
34
|
Predictors of biologic-free disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after stopping tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment. BMC Rheumatol 2019; 3:3. [PMID: 31225430 PMCID: PMC6567570 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-019-0071-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to identify predictors of prolonged disease control after discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Post-hoc analysis of 439 RA patients (67.3% rheumatoid factor positive) with longstanding RA in remission or with stable low disease activity, randomized to stopping TNFi treatment in the multicenter POET trial. Prolonged acceptable disease control was defined as not restarting TNFi treatment within 12 months after stopping. Baseline demographic and disease-related variables were included in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for identifying predictors of relapse. Results One year after baseline, 220 patients (50.1%) had not restarted TNFi treatment. Use of an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (versus a receptor antagonist, OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.58–3.67), ≤10 yrs. disease duration (OR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.42–3.26) and low or moderate multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) scores (OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.10–3.64) at baseline were independently predictive of successful TNFi discontinuation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61–0.71). Results were similar when using no physician-reported flare as the criterion. TNFi-free survival was significantly different for patient groups based on the number of predictors present, ranging from 21.4% of patients with no predictor present to 66.7% of patients with all three predictors present. Conclusion Patients using an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, with shorter disease duration and low or moderate baseline MBDA score are most likely to achieve prolonged disease control after TNFi discontinuation. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR3112, 21 October 2011. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-019-0071-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
35
|
Association between seropositivity and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors due to ineffectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38:2757-2763. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04626-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
36
|
Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJF, van der Maas A, Vriezekolk JE, Hulscher ME, van den Hoogen FHJ, Jacobs WCH, van Herwaarden N, den Broeder AA. Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD010455. [PMID: 31125448 PMCID: PMC6534285 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010455.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in treating people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but are associated with (dose-dependent) adverse effects and high costs. To prevent overtreatment, several trials have assessed the effectiveness of down-titration compared with continuation of the standard dose. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2014. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, or disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents on disease activity, functioning, costs, safety, and radiographic damage compared with usual care in people with RA and low disease activity. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL (29 March 2018) and four trial registries (11 April 2018) together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We screened conference proceedings (American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism 2005-2017). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) to usual care/no down-titration in people with RA and low disease activity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS One previously included trial was excluded retrospectively in this update because it was not an RCT/CCT. We included eight additional trials, for a total of 14 studies (13 RCTs and one CCT, 3315 participants in total) reporting anti-TNF down-titration. Six studies (1148 participants) reported anti-TNF dose reduction compared with anti-TNF continuation. Eight studies (2111 participants) reported anti-TNF discontinuation compared with anti-TNF continuation (three studies assessed both anti-TNF discontinuation and dose reduction), and three studies assessed disease activity-guided anti-TNF dose tapering (365 participants). These studies included data on all anti-TNF agents, but primarily adalimumab and etanercept. Thirteen studies were available in full text, one was available as abstract. We assessed the included studies generally at low to moderate risk of bias; our main concerns were bias due to open-label treatment and unblinded outcome assessment. Clinical heterogeneity between the trials was high. The included studies were performed at clinical centres around the world and included people with early as well as established RA, the majority of whom were female with mean ages between 47 and 60. Study durations ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years.We found that anti-TNF dose reduction leads to little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 26 to 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, mean difference (MD) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.24, absolute risk difference (ARD) 1%) compared with continuation. Also, anti-TNF dose reduction does not result in an important deterioration in function after 26 to 52 weeks (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) (high-certainty evidence, MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.19, ARD 3%). Next to this, anti-TNF dose reduction may slightly reduce the proportion of participants switched to another biologic (low-certainty evidence), but probably slightly increases the proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, risk ratio (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.95, ARD 2% higher). Anti-TNF dose reduction may cause little or no difference in serious adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and proportion of participants with persistent remission (low-certainty evidence).Results show that anti-TNF discontinuation probably slightly increases the mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 28 to 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.25, ARD 14%), and that the RR of persistent remission lies between 0.16 and 0.77 (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF discontinuation increases the proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.59, ARD 7%) and may lead to a slight deterioration in function (HAQ-DI) (low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-TNF discontinuation influences the number of serious adverse events (due to very low-certainty evidence) and the number of withdrawals due to adverse events after 28 to 52 weeks probably increases slightly (moderate-certainty evidence, RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.84, ARD 1% higher).Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may result in little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 72 to 78 weeks (low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering results in little or no difference in the proportion of participants with persistent remission after 18 months (high-certainty evidence, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06, ARD -9%) and may result in little or no difference in switching to another biologic (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may slightly increase proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression (low-certainty evidence) and probably leads to a slight deterioration of function after 18 months (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.2 higher, 0.02 lower to 0.42 higher, ARD 7% higher), It is uncertain whether anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering influences the number of serious adverse events due to very low-certainty evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found that fixed-dose reduction of anti-TNF, after at least three to 12 months of low disease activity, is comparable to continuation of the standard dose regarding disease activity and function, and may be comparable with regards to the proportion of participants with persistent remission. Discontinuation (also without disease activity-guided adaptation) of anti-TNF is probably inferior to continuation of treatment with respect to disease activity, the proportion of participants with persistent remission, function, and minimal radiographic damage. Disease activity-guided dose tapering of anti-TNF is comparable to continuation of treatment with respect to the proportion of participants with persistent remission and may be comparable regarding disease activity.Caveats of this review are that available data are mainly limited to etanercept and adalimumab, the heterogeneity between studies, and the use of superiority instead of non-inferiority designs.Future research should focus on the anti-TNF agents infliximab and golimumab; assessment of disease activity, function, and radiographic outcomes after longer follow-up; and assessment of long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and predictors for successful down-titration. Also, use of a validated flare criterion, non-inferiority designs, and disease activity-guided tapering instead of fixed-dose reduction or discontinuation would allow researchers to better interpret study findings and generalise to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise M Verhoef
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Bart JF van den Bemt
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of PharmacyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6522JV
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PharmacyNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Marlies E Hulscher
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical CenterIQ healthcarePO Box 9101117 KWAZONijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | - Frank HJ van den Hoogen
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of RheumatologyNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Wilco CH Jacobs
- The Health ScientistFraeylemastraat 13The HagueNetherlands2532 TX
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of RheumatologyNijmegenNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fortea-Gordo P, Nuño L, Villalba A, Peiteado D, Monjo I, Sánchez-Mateos P, Puig-Kröger A, Balsa A, Miranda-Carús ME. Two populations of circulating PD-1hiCD4 T cells with distinct B cell helping capacity are elevated in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:1662-1673. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
A novel population of B helper cells, phenotypically CD4+CXCR5−PD-1hi, has been described in the synovial tissues and peripheral blood of seropositive RA patients, and termed ‘peripheral helper T’ (Tph) cells. Contrary to CD4+CXCR5+PD-1hi follicular helper T (Tfh), Tph cells are not located in lymphoid organs but accumulate in inflamed tissues. Our objective was to study the frequency of circulating Tph (cTph) and circulating Tfh cell counterparts (cTfh) in patients with early RA (eRA).
Methods
Freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 56 DMARD-naïve eRA patients and 56 healthy controls were examined by flow cytometry. Autologous cocultures of naïve or memory B cells were established with isolated peripheral blood Tph or Tfh cells.
Results
Seropositive (RF+ and/or ACPA+, n = 38) but not seronegative eRA patients (n = 18) demonstrated increased frequencies and absolute numbers of cTph and cTfh cells. cTph but not cTfh cells expressed CCR2. Those eRA patients who experienced a significant clinical improvement at 12 months demonstrated a marked decrease of their cTph cell numbers whereas their cTfh cell numbers remained unchanged. Both isolated Tph and isolated Tfh cells were able to induce maturation of memory B cells, whereas only Tfh cells could differentiate naïve B cells.
Conclusion
Two populations of PD-1hiCD4 T cells with distinct phenotype and B cell helping capacity are increased in the peripheral blood of seropositive eRA patients. Whereas cTph cells are present only in patients with an active disease, cTfh cells seem to be constitutively elevated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Nuño
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz
| | | | - Diana Peiteado
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz
| | - Irene Monjo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz
| | - Paloma Sánchez-Mateos
- Laboratorio de Inmuno-Oncología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amaya Puig-Kröger
- Laboratorio de Inmuno-Oncología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Mulligen E, de Jong PHP, Kuijper TM, van der Ven M, Appels C, Bijkerk C, Harbers JB, de Man Y, Molenaar THE, Tchetverikov I, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, van Zeben J, Hazes JMW, Weel AEAM, Luime JJ. Gradual tapering TNF inhibitors versus conventional synthetic DMARDs after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: first-year results of the randomised controlled TARA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:746-753. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two tapering strategies after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), during 1 year of follow-up.MethodsIn this multicentre single-blinded (research nurses) randomised controlled trial, patients with RA were included who achieved controlled disease, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 and a Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ≤ 1, treated with both a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and a TNF inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors. Medication was tapered if the RA was still under control, by cutting the dosage into half, a quarter and thereafter it was stopped. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with a disease flare, defined as DAS > 2.4 and/or SJC > 1. Secondary outcomes were DAS, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) after 1 year and over time.ResultsA total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering csDMARDs (n = 94) or tapering anti-TNF (n = 95). The cumulative flare rates in the csDMARD and anti-TNF tapering group were, respectively, 33 % (95% CI,24% to 43 %) and 43 % (95% CI, 33% to 53 % (p = 0.17). Mean DAS, HAQ-DI and EQ-5D did not differ between tapering groups after 1 year and over time.ConclusionUp to 9 months, flare rates of tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors were similar. After 1 year, a non-significant difference was found of 10 % favouring csDMARD tapering. Tapering TNF inhibitors was, therefore, not superior to tapering csDMARDs. From a societal perspective, it would be sensible to taper the TNF inhibitor first, because of possible cost reductions and less long-term side effects.Trial registration numberNTR2754
Collapse
|
39
|
Bano A, Pera A, Almoukayed A, Clarke THS, Kirmani S, Davies KA, Kern F. CD28 null CD4 T-cell expansions in autoimmune disease suggest a link with cytomegalovirus infection. F1000Res 2019; 8. [PMID: 30984377 PMCID: PMC6436193 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17119.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunosenescence is thought to contribute to the increase of autoimmune diseases in older people. Immunosenescence is often associated with the presence of an expanded population of CD4 T cells lacking expression of CD28 (CD28
null). These highly cytotoxic CD4 T cells were isolated from disease-affected tissues in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, or other chronic inflammatory diseases and their numbers appeared to be linked to disease severity. However, we recently demonstrated that the common herpes virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), not ageing, is the major driver of this subset of cytotoxic T cells. In this review, we discuss how CMV might potentiate and exacerbate autoimmune disease through the expansion of CD28
null CD4 T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aalia Bano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Alejandra Pera
- Department of Immunology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia Hospital, University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Ahmad Almoukayed
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Thomas H S Clarke
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Sukaina Kirmani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Kevin A Davies
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Florian Kern
- Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ghiti Moghadam M, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, Kneepkens EL, Klaasen R, Stolk JN, Tchetverikov I, Vreugdenhil SA, van Woerkom JM, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, Landewé RBM, van Riel PLCM, van de Laar MAFJ, Jansen TL. Impact of Stopping Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors on Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Burden of Disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 70:516-524. [PMID: 28692770 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of stopping tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of physical and mental health status, health utility, pain, disability, and fatigue in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS In the pragmatic, 12-month POET trial, 817 RA patients with ≥6 months of remission or stable low disease activity were randomized 2:1 to stopping or continuing TNFi. In case of flare, TNFi was restarted at the discretion of the rheumatologist. PROs were assessed every 3 months. RESULTS TNFi was restarted within 12 months in 252 of 531 patients (47.5%) in the stop group. At 3 months, mean PRO scores were significantly worse in the stop group, and a larger proportion of patients experienced a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) on all PROs. Effect sizes (ES) were strongest for health utility (ES -0.24) and pain (ES -0.30). Mean scores improved again after this point, but disability scores remained significantly different at 12 months. After 12 months, the relative risk of experiencing an MCID ranged from 1.16 for mental health status to 1.58 for fatigue. Mean PRO scores for patients restarting TNFi within 6 months were no longer significantly different from those that did not restart TNFi at 12 months. CONCLUSION Stopping TNFi had a significant negative short-term impact on a broad range of PROs. Long-term negative consequences appeared to be limited, and outcomes in patients needing to restart TNFi within the first 6 months tended to be restored at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Ghiti Moghadam
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruth Klaasen
- Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N Stolk
- Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mangoni AA, Al Okaily F, Almoallim H, Al Rashidi S, Mohammed RHA, Barbary A. Relapse rates after elective discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and review of literature. BMC Rheumatol 2019; 3:10. [PMID: 30886998 PMCID: PMC6408847 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-019-0058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are current mainstay of therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The decision when to withdraw TNF-α inhibitors after achieving remission and the incidence of relapse rates with elective discontinuation are both important questions that demand intense survey in these patients. In this meta-analysis we aimed to estimate the magnitude of relapse rate after elective TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation in RA patients with remission. METHODS Systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library databases, grey literature (unpublished and ongoing trials) from the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health were performed for studies reporting the outcomes of elective discontinuation of TNF-α inhibitor in RA patients after remission. Random-effects models for meta-analyses were conducted on extracted data. RESULTS Out of 390 references screened, 16 RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of 1264 patient data revealed a relapse rate of 0.47 (95% CI 0.41-0.54). Sensitivity analysis showed that none of the studies had higher influence on the results. CONCLUSIONS Almost half of all the RA patients in remission relapse after elective TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. This information might be useful when considering this management option with individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arduino A Mangoni
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
| | | | - Hani Almoallim
- 3Department of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Reem Hamdy A Mohammed
- 4Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
- 5Internal Medicine Department, Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal Barbary
- 6Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Tanta University Faculty of Medicine, Elgesh Street, Tanta, Gharbeia Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alemao E, Al MJ, Boonen AA, Stevenson MD, Verstappen SMM, Michaud K, Weinblatt ME, Rutten-van Mölken MPMH. Conceptual model for the health technology assessment of current and novel interventions in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205013. [PMID: 30289926 PMCID: PMC6173427 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate current approaches to economic modeling in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and propose a new conceptual model for evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of RA interventions. We followed recommendations from the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research-Society of Medical Decision Making (ISPOR-SMDM) Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2. The process involved scoping the decision problem by a working group and drafting a preliminary cost-effectiveness model framework. A systematic literature review (SLR) of existing decision-analytic models was performed and analysis of an RA registry was conducted to inform the structure of the draft conceptual model. Finally, an expert panel was convened to seek input on the draft conceptual model. The proposed conceptual model consists of three separate modules: 1) patient characteristic module, 2) treatment module, and 3) outcome module. Consistent with the scope, the conceptual model proposed six changes to current economic models in RA. These changes proposed are to: 1) use composite measures of disease activity to evaluate treatment response as well as disease progression (at least two measures should be considered, one as the base case and one as a sensitivity analysis); 2) conduct utility mapping based on disease activity measures; 3) incorporate subgroups based on guideline-recommended prognostic factors; 4) integrate realistic treatment patterns based on clinical practice/registry datasets; 5) assimilate outcomes that are not joint related (extra-articular outcomes); and 6) assess mortality based on disease activity. We proposed a conceptual model that incorporates the current understanding of clinical and real-world evidence in RA, as well as of existing modeling assumptions. The proposed model framework was reviewed with experts and could serve as a foundation for developing future cost-effectiveness models in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evo Alemao
- Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Lawrence, New Jersey, United States of America
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maiwenn J. Al
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies A. Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew D. Stevenson
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne M. M. Verstappen
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, New England, United States of America
| | - Michael E. Weinblatt
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Mölken
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bechman K, Tweehuysen L, Garrood T, Scott DL, Cope AP, Galloway JB, Ma MHY. Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity: Predictability and Association with Worse Clinical Outcomes. J Rheumatol 2018; 45:1515-1521. [PMID: 30173149 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.171375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate predictors of flare in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low disease activity (LDA) and to evaluate the effect of flare on 12-month clinical outcomes. METHODS Patients with RA who were taking disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and had a stable 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) < 3.2 were eligible for inclusion. At baseline and every 3 months, clinical (DAS28), functional [Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), EQ-5D, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale (FACIT-F), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36)], serum biomarkers [multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score, calprotectin, CXCL10], and imaging data were collected. Flare was defined as an increase in DAS28 compared with baseline of > 1.2, or > 0.6 if concurrent DAS28 ≥ 3.2. Cox regression analyses were used to identify baseline predictors of flare. Biomarkers were cross-sectionally correlated at time of flare. Linear regressions were performed to compare clinical outcomes after 1 year. RESULTS Of 152 patients, 46 (30%) experienced a flare. Functional disability at baseline was associated with flare: HAQ-DI had an unadjusted HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.20-2.72) and EQ-5D had HR 0.20 (95% CI 0.07-0.57). In multivariate analyses, only HAQ-DI remained a significant independent predictor of flare (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05-2.93). At time of flare, DAS28 and its components significantly correlated with MBDA and calprotectin, but correlation coefficients were low at 0.52 and 0.49, respectively. Two-thirds of flares were not associated with a rise in biomarkers. Patients who flared had significantly worse outcomes at 12 months (HAQ-DI, EQ-5D, FACIT-F, SF-36, and radiographic progression). CONCLUSION Flares occur frequently in RA patients with LDA and are associated with worse disease activity, quality of life, and radiographic progression. Higher baseline HAQ-DI was modestly predictive of flare, while biomarker correlation at the time of flare suggests a noninflammatory component in a majority of events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Bechman
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. .,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London.
| | - Lieke Tweehuysen
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| | - Toby Garrood
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| | - David L Scott
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| | - Andrew P Cope
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| | - James B Galloway
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| | - Margaret H Y Ma
- From the Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London, London; Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,K. Bechman, MBChB, BSc, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; L. Tweehuysen, MD, Rheumatology Registrar and Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek; T. Garrood, MBBS, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; D.L. Scott, BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; A.P. Cope, BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FHEA, Professor of Rheumatology, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; J.B. Galloway, MBChB, MSc, CHP, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist/Senior Lecturer, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London; M.H. Ma, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, MSc, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist, Academic Department of Rheumatology, Kings College London
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tran-Duy A, Ghiti Moghadam M, Oude Voshaar MAH, Vonkeman HE, Boonen A, Clarke P, McColl G, Ten Klooster PM, Zijlstra TR, Lems WF, Riyazi N, Griep EN, Hazes JMW, Landewé R, Bernelot Moens HJ, van Riel PLCM, van de Laar MAFJ, Jansen TL. An Economic Evaluation of Stopping Versus Continuing Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Disease Remission or Low Disease Activity: Results From a Pragmatic Open-Label Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018; 70:1557-1564. [PMID: 29745059 DOI: 10.1002/art.40546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate, from a societal perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness of withdrawing tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment compared to continuation of these drugs within a 1-year, randomized trial among rheumatoid arthritis patients with longstanding, stable disease activity or remission. METHODS Data were collected from a pragmatic, open-label trial. Cost-utility analysis was performed using the nonparametric bootstrapping method, and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve was constructed using the net-monetary benefit framework, where a willingness-to-accept threshold (WTA) was defined as the minimal cost saved that a patient accepted for each quality-adjusted life year (QALY) lost. RESULTS A total of 531 patients were randomized to the stop group and 286 patients to the continuation group. Withdrawal of TNFi treatment resulted in a >60% reduction of the total drug cost, but led to an increase of ∼30% in other health care expenditures. Compared to continuation, stopping TNFi resulted in a mean yearly cost saving of €7,133 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] €6,071, €8,234]) and was associated with a mean loss of QALYs of 0.02 (95% CI 0.002, 0.040). Mean saved cost per QALY lost and per extra flare incurred in the stop group compared to the continuation group was €368,269 (95% CI €155,132, €1,675,909) and €17,670 (95% CI €13,650, €22,721), respectively. At a WTA of €98,438 per QALY lost, the probability that stopping TNFi treatment is cost-effective was 100%. CONCLUSION Although an official WTA is not defined, the mean saved cost of €368,269 per QALY lost seems acceptable in The Netherlands, given existing data on willingness to pay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Tran-Duy
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Ghiti Moghadam
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Maastricht University Medical Center and Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Clarke
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Geoff McColl
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem F Lems
- VU University Medical Center and Reade Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Riyazi
- Haga Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - E N Griep
- Antonius Medical Center, Sneek, The Netherlands
| | - J M W Hazes
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - T L Jansen
- Viecurie Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hashimoto M, Furu M, Yamamoto W, Fujimura T, Hara R, Katayama M, Ohnishi A, Akashi K, Yoshida S, Nagai K, Son Y, Amuro H, Hirano T, Ebina K, Uozumi R, Ito H, Tanaka M, Ohmura K, Fujii T, Mimori T. Factors associated with the achievement of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20:165. [PMID: 30075810 PMCID: PMC6091083 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1673-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical remission can be maintained after the discontinuation of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in some patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (bDMARD-free remission (BFR)). It is unknown which bDMARD is advantageous for achieving BFR or under which conditions BFR can be considered. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with BFR achievement in clinical practice. Methods Patients with RA were enrolled from a Japanese multicenter observational registry. Patients with RA who achieved clinical remission (Disease Activity Score 28—C-reactive protein < 2.3) at the time of bDMARD discontinuation were included. Serial disease activities and treatment changes were followed up. BFR was considered to have failed if the disease activity exceeded the remission cutoff value or if bDMARDs were restarted. Results Overall, 181 RA patients were included. BFR was maintained in 21.5% of patients at 1 year after bDMARD discontinuation. BFR was more successfully achieved after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies (TNFi(mAb)) (infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab), followed by CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), soluble TNF receptor or Fab fragments against TNF fused with polyethylene glycol (etanercept and certolizumab), and anti-interleukin-6 receptor Ab (tocilizumab). After multivariate analysis, sustained remission (> 6 months), Boolean remission, no glucocorticoid use at the time of bDMARD discontinuation, and use of TNFi(mAb) or CTLA4-Ig remained as independent factors associated with BFR. Conclusions BFR can be achieved in some patients with RA after bDMARD discontinuation in clinical practice. Use of TNFi(mAb) or CTLA4-Ig, sustained remission, Boolean remission, and no glucocorticoid use at the time of bDMARD discontinuation are advantageous for achieving BFR. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1673-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motomu Hashimoto
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Moritoshi Furu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Wararu Yamamoto
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.,Department of Health Information Management, Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Takanori Fujimura
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Ryota Hara
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Masaki Katayama
- Department of Rheumatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Ohnishi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kengo Akashi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shuzo Yoshida
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Nagai
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yonsu Son
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Amuro
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toru Hirano
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Rheumatic Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kosuke Ebina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryuji Uozumi
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiromu Ito
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masao Tanaka
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Koichiro Ohmura
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takao Fujii
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Tsuneyo Mimori
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ghiti Moghadam M, Lamers-Karnebeek FBG, Vonkeman HE, ten Klooster PM, Tekstra J, Schilder AM, Visser H, Sasso EH, Chernoff D, Lems WF, van Schaardenburg DJ, Landewe R, Bernelot Moens HJ, Radstake TRDJ, van Riel PLCM, van de Laar MAFJ, Jansen TL. Multi-biomarker disease activity score as a predictor of disease relapse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stopping TNF inhibitor treatment. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192425. [PMID: 29791439 PMCID: PMC5965880 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Successfully stopping or reducing treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in low disease activity (LDA) may improve cost-effectiveness of care. We evaluated the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score as a predictor of disease relapse after discontinuation of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment. Methods 439 RA patients who were randomized to stop TNFi treatment in the POET study were analyzed post-hoc. Three indicators of disease relapse were assessed over 12 months: 1) restarting TNFi treatment, 2) escalation of any DMARD therapy and 3) physician-reported flare. MBDA score was assessed at baseline. Associations between MBDA score and disease relapse were examined using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Results At baseline, 50.1%, 35.3% and 14.6% of patients had low (<30), moderate (30−44) or high (>44) MBDA scores. Within 12 months, 49.9% of patients had restarted TNFi medication, 59.0% had escalation of any DMARD and 57.2% had ≥1 physician-reported flare. MBDA score was associated with each indicator of relapse. At least one indicator of relapse was observed in 59.5%, 68.4% and 81.3% of patients with low, moderate or high MBDA scores, respectively (P = 0.004). Adjusted for baseline DAS28-ESR, disease duration, BMI and erosions, high MBDA scores were associated with increased risk for restarting TNFi treatment (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.00–3.40), DMARD escalation (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.01–3.94) and physician-reported flare (OR = 2.00, 95% 1.06–3.77). Conclusion For RA patients with stable LDA who stopped TNFi, a high baseline MBDA score was independently predictive of disease relapse within 12 months. The MBDA score may be useful for identifying patients at risk of relapse after TNFi discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Ghiti Moghadam
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M. ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk Visser
- Department of Rheumatology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Eric H. Sasso
- Crescendo Bioscience, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - David Chernoff
- Crescendo Bioscience, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Willem F. Lems
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert Landewe
- Department of Rheumatology, AMC Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Piet L. C. M. van Riel
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A. F. J. van de Laar
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Tim L. Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Opoka-Winiarska V, Żuber Z, Alexeeva E, Chasnyk V, Nikishina I, Dębowska G, Smolewska E. Long-term, interventional, open-label extension study evaluating the safety of tocilizumab treatment in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis from Poland and Russia who completed the global, international CHERISH trial. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 37:1807-1816. [PMID: 29654485 PMCID: PMC6006189 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4071-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, were demonstrated in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with polyarticular course (pJIA) in the CHERISH trial. This observational, III phase study evaluated long-term treatment of TCZ in pJIA patients was conducted by members of the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) from Poland and Russia. Forty-one patients, who had completed the CHERISH core study (104 weeks), were extensionally treated with TCZ (8 mg/kg, intravenous infusion every 4 weeks). Total treatment time was from 131 to 193 weeks. The long-term safety (the primary endpoint) and efficacy were evaluated. All patients achieved ACR70 response in the core study and continued to achieve at least ACR50 response up to week 24 of this study. The safety population comprised 46.41 patient-years (PY). Rates per 100 PY of adverse (AEs) and serious events (SAEs) were 181.0 and 6.46, respectively. Pharyngitis and respiratory tract infections were the most common AEs. Except one AE (severe neutropenia), all others were classified as mild (24.4%) or moderate (29.3%). The incidence of SAEs was low (7.3%). No new safety findings were observed. The safety profile of over 2.5-year treatment with TCZ is consistent with the pre-marketing CHERISH clinical trial. Presented data and continued efficacy response support the use of TCZ in pJIA. EUDRACT No: 2011-001607-12. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01575769?term=ML27783
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violetta Opoka-Winiarska
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Rheumatology, Medical University of Lublin, Gębali 6 Street, 20-093, Lublin, Poland.
| | - Zbigniew Żuber
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Rheumatology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Cracow, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Alexeeva
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "National Medical Research Center of Children's Health" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Irina Nikishina
- Pediatric Department, Federal State Budgetary Institution V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Grażyna Dębowska
- Medical Department, Roche Poland Sp. z o.o. (the employee of Roche Polska Sp. z o.o. till 30.04.2015), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Smolewska
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rongen GA, van Ingen I, Kok M, Vonkeman H, Janssen M, Jansen TL. Vasodilator function worsens after cessation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis only if a flare occurs. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 37:909-916. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3961-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
49
|
Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in naïve or TNF-inhibitors failure psoriatic arthritis patients: a 24-month prospective multicentric study. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 37:397-405. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3953-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
50
|
Henaux S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Cantagrel A, Barnetche T, Fautrel B, Filippi N, Lukas C, Raffeiner B, Rossini M, Degboé Y, Constantin A. Risk of losing remission, low disease activity or radiographic progression in case of bDMARD discontinuation or tapering in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 77:515-522. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the risk of losing remission, low disease activity (LDA) or radiographic progression in the case of (1) discontinuing or (2) tapering doses of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with continuation of the initial treatment regimen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with remission or LDA.Materials and methodsA systematic literature analysis was carried out through May 2017 on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and international congress databases, selecting controlled trials comparing bDMARDs discontinuation/tapering versus continuation in RA patients with remission or LDA. The meta-analysis assessed the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of losing remission or LDA and the risk of radiographic progression after (1) discontinuing and (2) tapering doses of bDMARDs versus continuing the initial treatment.ResultsThe meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs discontinuation versus continuation performed on nine trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.97(1.43 to 2.73), P<0.0001) or LDA (RR (95% CI)=2.24(1.52 to 3.30), P<0.0001) and an increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(1.02 to 1.17), P=0.01) in case of bDMARD discontinuation. The meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs tapering versus continuation performed on 11 trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.23(1.06 to 1.42), P=0.006) but no increased risk of losing LDA (RR (95% CI)=1.02 (0.85 to 1.23), P=0.81) nor any increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(0.94 to 1.26), P=0.26) in case of bDMARD tapering.ConclusionDiscontinuation of bDMARDs leads to an increased risk of losing remission or LDA and radiographic progression, while tapering doses of bDMARDs does not increase the risk of relapse (LDA) or radiographic progression, even though there is an increased risk of losing remission.
Collapse
|