1
|
Looijen AEM, van Mulligen E, Vonkeman HE, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, de Jong PHP. Responsiveness and sensitivity of PROMs to change in disease activity status in early and established rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024:keae213. [PMID: 38574380 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing activity limitations, health impact, pain, fatigue and work ability are responsive and sensitive to changes in disease activity status in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS All early RA patients (n = 557) from the tREACH-trial and established RA patients (n = 188) from the TARA-trial were included. Both studies were multicentre, single-blinded trials with a treat-to-target management approach. The following PROMs were studied: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index(HAQ-DI), morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health, 36-item short form(SF-36), joint pain, fatigue and productivity loss. Mean changes in PROMs between two consecutive visits were compared with changes in disease activity status(remission, low disease activity and active disease) using linear mixed models and standardised response means. Additionally, the proportion of individual observations that showed an expected PROM response to disease activity status alterations was calculated. RESULTS HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, general health, EQ-5D and joint pain demonstrated responsiveness to improvement or worsening of disease activity status in both early and established RA. SF-36 physical and mental component scale, fatigue and productivity loss did not show this effect in both groups. Across nearly all PROMs, the magnitude of change and the proportion of individual observations that reflect a shift from and to active disease remained low. CONCLUSION HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health and joint pain are responsive to disease activity status alterations on a group level in both early and established RA. For the individual patient the responsiveness of these PROMs is poor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION tREACH trial (www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN26791028) and TARA trial (www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl, NTR2754).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elise van Mulligen
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kleinrensink NJ, Spierings J, Vonkeman HE, Seddiqi N, Herman A, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Heijstek MW, Jansen MP, de Jong PA, Foppen W. Increased vascular inflammation on PET/CT in psoriatic arthritis patients in comparison with controls. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003547. [PMID: 38296307 PMCID: PMC10836343 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly due to a chronic inflammatory state. OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study was to investigate the difference in vascular inflammation, measured with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), in PsA patients and controls. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess the association between clinical parameters of disease activity with vascular inflammation in PsA. METHODS We included a total of 75 PsA patients with active peripheral arthritis (defined as ≥2 tender and swollen joints) from an ongoing clinical trial (EudraCT 2017-003900-28) and a retrospective group of 40 controls diagnosed with melanoma, without distant metastases and not receiving immunotherapy. The main outcome measure was aortic vascular inflammation which was measured on PET/CT scans using target-to-background ratios. Clinical disease activity in PsA was assessed with joint counts, body surface area and the Disease Activity index for PsA. Laboratory assessments included C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS Vascular inflammation was increased in patients with PsA in comparison with controls (mean target-to-background ratio for entire aorta, respectively, 1.63±0.17 vs 1.49±0.16; p=<0.001). This association remained significant after correction for gender, age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure and aortic calcification (p=0.002). Vascular inflammation was not associated with disease-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS Aortic vascular inflammation was significantly increased in patients with active PsA compared with controls. This evidence supports the theory that inflammation in PsA is not limited to the skin and joints but also involves the vascular system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke J Kleinrensink
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Julia Spierings
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Negina Seddiqi
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Amin Herman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes W Heijstek
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mylène P Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Pim A de Jong
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter Foppen
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alten R, Nieto-Gonzalez JC, Jacques P, Montecucco C, Moots R, Radner H, Vonkeman HE, Heidenreich S, Whichello C, Krucien N, Van Beneden K. What benefit-risk trade-offs are acceptable to rheumatoid arthritis patients during treatment selection? Evidence from a multicountry choice experiment. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003311. [PMID: 38199605 PMCID: PMC10806488 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can facilitate tailored patient-centric care. This study elicited trade-offs that patients with RA were willing to make during treatment selection. METHODS Patients with RA completed an online discrete choice experiment, consisting of a series of choices between hypothetical treatments. Treatment attributes were selected based on literature review and qualitative patient interviews. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with RA, receiving systemic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, and residents of Europe or USA. Male patients were oversampled for subgroup analyses. Data were analysed using a correlated mixed logit model. RESULTS Of 2090 participants, 42% were female; mean age was 45.2 years (range 18-83). Estimated effects were significant for all attributes (p<0.001) but varied between patients. Average relative attribute importance scores revealed different priorities (p<0.001) between males and females. While reducing pain and negative effect on semen parameters was most important to males, females were most concerned by risk of blood clots and serious infections. No single attribute explained treatment preferences by more than 30%. Preferences were also affected by patients' age: patients aged 18-44 years placed less importance on frequency and mode of treatment administration (p<0.05) than older age groups. Patients were willing to accept higher risk of serious infections and blood clots in exchange for improvements in pain, daily activities or administration convenience. However, acceptable trade-offs varied between patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Treatment preferences of patients with RA were individual-specific, but driven by benefits and risks, with no single attribute dominating the decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke Alten
- Schlosspark Klinik, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Peggy Jacques
- Department of Rheumatology and VIB Inflammation Research Center, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carlomaurizio Montecucco
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Robert Moots
- Department of Rheumatology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Faculty of Health, Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Helga Radner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Webers C, El-Din RN, Beckers E, Been M, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Factors associated with treatment intensification in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and high disease activity in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead634. [PMID: 38048595 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate which factors are associated with treatment intensification (TI) in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients with high disease activity (HDA). METHODS Patients with axSpA and HDA (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]≥2.1) from the Dutch SpA-Net registry were included. TI was defined as: 1) higher dose or shorter interval of the same drug, 2) switch from current drug to another due to inefficacy, or 3) addition of a new drug. Only anti-inflammatory drugs were considered. Primary determinants considered were ASDAS, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) and physician global (PhGA). Acceptable symptom state according to patient (PASS-patient) or physician (PASS-physician) were included in sensitivity analyses. Patient-centered and physician-centered logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between potential determinants and TI. RESULTS In total, 121 patients with HDA were included. TI was conducted in a minority (41/121, 33.9%), and mainly involved a switch or addition of a drug. In multivariable regression analyses, a higher ASDAS was associated with TI in the patient-centered model (ORASDAS = 1.94, [95%CI 1.00-3.74]). However, in the physician-centered model, this association attenuated, and PhGA or PASS-physician were the primary factors associated with TI (ORPhGA = 1.71 [1.24-2.34]; ORPASS-physician = 94.95). Interestingly, patient-centered factors (ASAS HI/PASS-patient/education level) did not contribute to TI. CONCLUSION In practice, treatment is intensified in a minority of axSpA patients with HDA. Physician-centered factors are associated with the decision to change treatment, independently of disease activity or patient perspective. Further research is needed to better understand these decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rabab Nezam El-Din
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Beckers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marin Been
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Webers C, Boonen A, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Factors Associated With Residual Disease in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a Clinical Practice Registry. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1430-1438. [PMID: 37453735 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore residual disease, defined as substantial symptoms and disease burden despite a remission or low disease activity (LDA) state, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and to determine which factors are associated with residual disease. METHODS For this cross-sectional observational study, 1 timepoint per patient was used from SpA-Net, a web-based monitoring registry for SpA. Patients with an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) < 2.1 (LDA) were included. Indicators of residual disease (outcomes) included fatigue (primary outcome), pain, physical functioning, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and peripheral symptoms. Sex was the primary explanatory factor for residual disease. Other explanatory factors included demographics and disease-related factors. Associations between these factors and presence and extent of residual disease were explored using logistic and linear regression. RESULTS In total, 267 patients in an LDA state were included. Mean age was 50.6 (SD 14.3) years and 100 (37.5%) were female. Residual disease occurred frequently (n = 114 [42.7%] had fatigue scores > 4/10; n = 34 [17.8%] had pain scores > 4/10), including in those in remission (ASDAS < 1.3). Physical HRQOL was reduced in 27% and moderate/poor in 33%. Multivariable regression analyses showed that reported fatigue was more severe and prevalent in female patients (fatigue severity [0-10]: Bfemale = 0.78, 95% CI 0.18-1.38; fatigue > 4/10: ORfemale = 3.29, 95% CI 1.74-6.20). Other indicators of residual disease (ie, pain, peripheral symptoms, physical HRQOL) were also more severe and/or more prevalent in females. CONCLUSION Residual disease is frequent in patients with axSpA who are in an LDA state, including remission, and it is particularly prevalent in female patients. Future studies should address how to manage or prevent residual disease in axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- C. Webers, MD, PhD, A. Boonen, MD, PhD, A. van Tubergen, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht;
| | - Annelies Boonen
- C. Webers, MD, PhD, A. Boonen, MD, PhD, A. van Tubergen, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- H.E. Vonkeman, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, and Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- C. Webers, MD, PhD, A. Boonen, MD, PhD, A. van Tubergen, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gorter A, Bakker MM, ten Klooster PM, Boonen A, Vonkeman HE. The impact of health literacy: associations with disease activity and medication prescription in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3409-3415. [PMID: 36825825 PMCID: PMC10547512 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal associations between health literacy profiles and disease activity and medication prescription in patients with RA. METHODS Patients with RA who previously completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and were assigned 1 of 10 distinct health literacy profiles based on cluster analysis were further aggregated into three groups: 'several health literacy limitations', 'some health literacy limitations' and 'good health literacy'. Linear mixed modelling (LMM) was used to analyse the association between health literacy groups and disease activity over the course of 1 year. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression analyses were used to compare medication prescriptions between the groups. RESULTS A total of 108 patients with RA were included. LMM showed a significant effect of health literacy group on disease activity over time (P = 0.010). Patients with 'good health literacy' had significantly lower disease activity over time [28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR) = 2.4] than patients with 'several health literacy limitations' (DAS28-ESR = 3.1), independent of age, gender and education level. Patients with 'good health literacy' were most often prescribed a biologic DMARD (50%), whereas patients with 'some health literacy limitations' more commonly received a conventional synthetic DMARD only [72.7%; odds ratio (OR) 4.24], and patients with 'several health literacy limitations' were more often prescribed prednisolone (52.4%; OR 3.56). CONCLUSION Significant differences in longitudinal disease activity and medication prescription were observed between groups with different health literacy levels. These results stress the importance of insights into the role of health literacy in treatment and outcomes in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Gorter
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mark M Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care & Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care & Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Lint JA, Sonnenberg M, Vonkeman HE, van den Bemt BJF, van Puijenbroek EP, Jessurun NT. Development of a Framework Structuring Themes in the Course of Adverse Drug Reactions from a Patient's Perspective. Drug Saf 2023; 46:1039-1047. [PMID: 37651084 PMCID: PMC10584729 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01343-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a need for more extensive information about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for patients than currently available, including information on the course of ADRs. Aspects characterising the course of ADRs from the patient perspective have not been identified before. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a framework based on common themes in the course of ADRs identified from patient descriptions in patient-reported ADRs. METHODS In this qualitative study, patient descriptions of the course of patient-reported ADRs were analysed by a thematic analysis with an inductive approach using three different existing datasets containing patient-reported ADRs. Two datasets included patient-reported ADRs from cohort event monitoring of biologics and direct oral anticoagulants and one dataset included spontaneous reports from patients concerning medication for lower urinary tract symptoms. A conceptual framework was developed from the identified main themes and subthemes. RESULTS Patient-reported data concerning 3888 ADRs were analysed. Six main themes with multiple subthemes were identified from patient descriptions of the course of ADRs. Four themes were descriptive: frequency of an ADR episode, duration of an ADR episode, moment or period of ADR occurrence, and development in the intensity of the ADR. Two themes concerned factors influencing the course of ADRs: triggering factors and improving factors. CONCLUSIONS The presented framework illustrates that patients describe extensive details on the course and timeframe of ADRs. The identified themes provide a basis for improving the systematic data collection of more extensive details about ADRs from patients as a first step towards the provision of more comprehensive ADR information to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marlieke Sonnenberg
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jansen N, ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van den Berg B, Buitenweg JR. Further evaluation of inflammatory and non-inflammatory aspects of pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 7:rkad076. [PMID: 37814655 PMCID: PMC10560383 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective A high discrepancy between the number of tender and swollen joints (e.g. ΔTSJ ≥ 7) has previously been used as an indication for the presence of changes in central mechanisms in patients with moderate-to-high disease activity. In this study, we explored whether the ΔTSJ can also be used to obtain insights into the underlying pain mechanisms in patients with on average well-controlled disease activity. Methods A 2 year retrospective analysis of routinely obtained 28-joint DAS (DAS28) components was performed on 45 patients with low inflammatory activity at the group level. All patients underwent pressure pain threshold (PPT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) measurements and completed four self-report questionnaires [short-form 36 (SF-36v2); central sensitization inventory (CSI); generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ); and the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)]. Results Patients with a ΔTSJ ≥ 3 at least once in the past 2 years showed significantly lower EPT and PPT values and higher levels of pain and disability on the SF-36v2 compared with the ΔTSJ < 3 group. Furthermore, GPQ scores were significantly higher in those with ΔTSJ ≥ 3, while CSI and PCS scores were similar. Conclusion These findings suggest that in patients in the ΔTSJ ≥ 3 group, mechanisms other than inflammation (only) underlie the pain. Moreover, our findings suggest that among the multiple potential underlying psychological mechanisms, pain catastrophizing (as measured by the PCS) and psychological hypervigilance (as measured by the CSI) do not play an important role. These findings could be useful in the clinical management of the patient. Depending on the dominant mechanism underlying the (persistent) pain, patients might respond differently to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Jansen
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M ten Klooster
- Psychology, Health & Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Psychology, Health & Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van den Berg
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jan R Buitenweg
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Velthuis K, Poppelaars F, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, Jessurun NT. Impact of adverse drug reactions on the treatment pathways of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective observational cohort study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:753-762. [PMID: 36946179 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2194628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several patient characteristics may be of influence on treatment pathways of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to analyze treatment pathways of early RA patients stratified for gender and adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Treatment pathways of patients included in the DREAM-RA treat-to-target cohort I between 16th of July 2006-30th of April 2020 were assessed. Treatment pathways were visualized in Sankey diagrams. Follow-up time, duration per treatment and the number of treatments received were stratified for gender and ADR occurrence and analyzed. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were performed where applicable. RESULTS Treatment pathways of 372 patients (follow-up: 2488.4 years, mean 6.7 ± 3.7 years) were analyzed. The Sankey diagrams visualize that treatment pathways became increasingly varied and complex over time. No significant differences were found when comparing female patients and male patients. However, the average treatment duration was shorter in patients with ADRs (1.8 vs. 2.7 years, p < 0.05), and the number of treatments higher (3.5 vs. 2.5, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Treatment pathways increase in complexity over time. Differences were found between patients with and without ADRs, with patients that experience ADRs receiving more and shorter treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Velthuis
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Fenna Poppelaars
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Transparency in Healthcare B.V, Hengelo, Netherlands
- Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jansen N, Berfelo T, Vonkeman HE, Ten Klooster PM, van Den Berg B, Krabbenbos IP, Buitenweg JR. The Relationship between Nociceptive Detection Thresholds and Pressure- and Electrical Pain Thresholds: An Explorative Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2023; 2023:1-4. [PMID: 38083185 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Recently, methods have been developed enabling the characterization of the nociceptive function at the detection threshold level by measuring nociceptive detection thresholds (NDTs), rather than at the level of the pain threshold via pain threshold (PT) measurements. Both NDT and PT measurements aim to characterize (parts of) the nociceptive system. To date it is unclear if, and if so to what extent, the two outcomes relate to one another. In this study, the primary aim is to explore the relationship between the two measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As secondary aim, we explore differences in NDT between these RA patients with age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) from a readily existing dataset. In total 46 RA patients have been recruited, whereby the pressure- (PPT; bilaterally at two locations) and electrical (EPT) pain threshold were evaluated, as well as the NDTs. Significant, positive correlations were found between the EPT and PPT (R=0.54-0.60), but not with the NDTs (R≤0.25). As compared to HC, higher NDTs were found in the RA group. As the presence of a statistically significant weak relationship can only be evaluated using a larger sample size, our results indicate that there is no moderate or stronger relation between PT and NDT outcomes. This implicates that the two outcomes are not strongly driven by the same (nociceptive) mechanism(s). Future research into NDTs and what factors and/or mechanisms affect the outcome, could yield relevant insights into how to use and interpret the results of this relatively new method.Clinical Relevance - The evaluation of nociceptive detection thresholds, in isolation or together with conventionally evaluated pain thresholds, might provide valuable and complementary insights into nociceptive (dis)function in man.
Collapse
|
11
|
van Lint JA, Jessurun NT, Tas SW, Vonkeman HE, van Doorn MBA, Hoentjen F, Nurmohamed MT, van Puijenbroek EP, van den Bemt BJF. Recurring Fatigue After Biologic Administration: Patient-Reported Data from the Dutch Biologic Monitor. BioDrugs 2023:10.1007/s40259-023-00592-8. [PMID: 37010772 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00592-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is a common problem in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients, significantly impacting their quality of life. OBJECTIVES In this study, we describe the pattern and characteristics of fatigue as a patient-reported adverse drug reaction (ADR) of biologics, and compared patient and treatment characteristics with patients reporting other ADRs or no ADRs. METHODS In this cohort event monitoring study, the description and characteristics of fatigue reported as a possible ADR in the Dutch Biologic Monitor were assessed and analysed for commonly recurring themes or patterns. Baseline and treatment characteristics of patients with fatigue and patients reporting other ADRs or no ADRs were compared. RESULTS Of 1382 participating patients, 108 patients (8%) reported fatigue as an ADR of a biologic. Almost half of these patients (50 patients, 46%) described episodes of fatigue during or shortly after biologic injection, which often recurred following subsequent injections. Patients with fatigue were significantly younger than patients with other ADRs or patients without ADRs (median age for patients with fatigue, 52 years; median age for patients with other ADRs, 56 years; and median age for patients without ADRs, 58 years); significantly more often smoked (25% vs. 16% and 15%); used infliximab (22% vs. 9% and 13%), rituximab (9% vs. 3% and 1%) or vedolizumab (6% vs. 2% and 1%); and significantly more often had Crohn's disease (28% vs. 13% and 13%) and other comorbidities (31% vs. 20% and 15%). Patients with fatigue significantly less frequently used etanercept (12% vs. 29% and 34%) or had rheumatoid arthritis (30% vs. 45% and 43%). CONCLUSIONS IMID patients may experience fatigue as a postdosing effect of biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam University Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Immunology Center, Location Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hermans K, Boonen A, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated care for spondyloarthritis: protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TeleSpA Study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067445. [PMID: 36806136 PMCID: PMC9944312 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, an accelerated uptake of remote monitoring strategies, replacing traditional face-to-face care, has been observed. However, data on the effects of remote care interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases remain scarce and interpretation is hampered by study heterogeneity and research quality concerns. High-quality evidence is required to guide future implementation in clinical practice, with health economic analyses identified as an important knowledge gap. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring with conventional care for patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) are currently lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS TeleSpA is a pragmatic, multicentre RCT investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated follow-up for patients with SpA, compared with conventional care. Two-hundred patients will be recruited at two hospitals and randomised (1:1) to the study intervention or standard care. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the number of follow-up visits by ≥25% in the intervention compared with standard care group, during a 1-year period. Secondary endpoints are (a) non-inferiority of the study intervention with regard to health outcomes, quality of care and patient-reported experience with care; and (b) cost-effectiveness of the intervention, evaluated through a prospective trial-based cost-utility analysis. In addition, experiences with the study intervention will be assessed among patients and healthcare providers, and factors associated with primary and secondary endpoints will be identified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Academic Hospital Maastricht/Maastricht University (NL71041.068.19/METC 19-059). Results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04673825.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Hermans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gosselt HR, van Lint JA, Kosse LJ, Spuls PI, Vonkeman HE, Tas SW, Hoentjen F, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bemt BJF, van Doorn MBA, Jessurun NT. Sex differences in adverse drug reactions from Adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:501-507. [PMID: 36794307 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2181340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examine sex differences in relation to the nature, frequency, and burden of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis patients using etanercept or adalimumab from the Dutch Biologic Monitor were sent bimonthly questionnaires concerning experienced ADRs. Sex differences in the proportion and nature of reported ADRs were assessed. Additionally, 5-point Likert-type scales reported for the burden of ADRs, were compared between sexes. RESULTS In total 748 consecutive patients were included (59% female). From the women 55% reported ≥1 ADR, which was significantly higher than 38% of the men that reported ≥1 ADR (p < 0.001). A total of 882 ADRs were reported comprising 264 distinct ADRs. The nature of the reported ADRs differed significantly between both sexes (p = 0.02). Women in particular reported more injection site reactions than men. The burden of ADRs was similar between sexes. CONCLUSIONS Sex differences in the frequency and nature of ADRs, but not in ADR burden, exist during treatment with adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This should be taken into consideration when investigating and reporting results on ADRs and when counseling patients in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen R Gosselt
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb,'s'-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb,'s'-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb,'s'-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Public Health and Epidemiology, Immunity and Infections, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Martijn B A van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb,'s'-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Velthuis K, Jessurun NT, Nguyen TDM, Scholl J, Jansen JRG, van Lint JA, Kosse LJ, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE. First-time adverse drug reactions, survival analysis, and the share of adverse drug reactions in treatment discontinuation in real-world rheumatoid arthritis patients: a comparison of first-time treatment with adalimumab and etanercept. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:485-492. [PMID: 36683590 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2172157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to compare nature and frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), time to first ADR, drug survival, and the share of ADRs in treatment discontinuation of first-time treatment with adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) in real-world RA patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Retrospective, single-center cohort study including naïve patients treated between January 2003-April 2020. Time to first ADR and drug survival of first-time treatment were studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression models up to 10 years, with 2- and 5-year post-hoc sensitivity analysis. Nature and frequencies of first-time ADRs and causes of treatment discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS In total, 416 patients (ADA: 255, ETN: 161, 4865 patient years) were included, of which 92 (22.1%) experienced ADR(s) (ADA: 59, 23.1%; ETN: 33, 20.4%). Adjusted for age, gender and concomitant conventional DMARD use, ADA was more likely to be discontinued than ETN up to 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up (adjusted HRs 1.63; 1.62; 1.59 (all p<0.001)). ADRs were the second reason of treatment discontinuation (ADA 20.7%, ETN 21.4%). CONCLUSIONS Despite seemingly different nature and frequencies, ADRs are the second reason of treatment discontinuation for both bDMARDs. Furthermore, 2-, 5-, and 10-year drug survival is longer for ETN compared to ADA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Velthuis
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Thi D M Nguyen
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Joep Scholl
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan R G Jansen
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Transparency in Healthcare BV, Hengelo, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bakker MM, Putrik P, Dikovec C, Rademakers J, Vonkeman HE, Kok MR, Voorneveld-Nieuwenhuis H, Ramiro S, de Wit M, Buchbinder R, Batterham R, Osborne RH, Boonen A. Exploring discordance between Health Literacy Questionnaire scores of people with RMDs and assessment by treating health professionals. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:52-64. [PMID: 35438147 PMCID: PMC9788830 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We studied discordance between health literacy of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and assessment of health literacy by their treating health professionals, and explored whether discordance is associated with the patients' socioeconomic background. METHODS Patients with RA, spondyloarthritis (SpA) or gout from three Dutch outpatient rheumatology clinics completed the nine-domain Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Treating health professionals assessed their patients on each HLQ domain. Discordance per domain was defined as a ≥2-point difference on a 0-10 scale (except if both scores were below three or above seven), leading to three categories: 'negative discordance' (i.e. professional scored lower), 'probably the same' or 'positive discordance' (i.e. professional scored higher). We used multivariable multilevel multinomial regression models with patients clustered by health professionals to test associations with socioeconomic factors (age, gender, education level, migration background, employment, disability for work, living alone). RESULTS We observed considerable discordance (21-40% of patients) across HLQ domains. Most discordance occurred for 'Critically appraising information' (40.5%, domain 5). Comparatively, positive discordance occurred more frequently. Negative discordance was more frequently and strongly associated with socioeconomic factors, specifically lower education level and non-Western migration background (for five HLQ domains). Associations between socioeconomic factors and positive discordance were less consistent. CONCLUSION Frequent discordance between patients' scores and professionals' estimations indicates there may be hidden challenges in communication and care, which differ between socioeconomic groups. Successfully addressing patients' health literacy needs cannot solely depend on health professionals' estimations but will require measurement and dialogue. VIDEO ABSTRACT A video abstract of this article can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggnB1rATdQ4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark M Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht UMC.,CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht UMC.,CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Cédric Dikovec
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht UMC
| | - Jany Rademakers
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht.,Nivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Arthritis Center Twente, Enschede
| | - Marc R Kok
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam
| | | | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden UMC, Leiden.,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Tools2Use Patient Association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.,Monash Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roy Batterham
- Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Richard H Osborne
- Centre for Global Health and Equity, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht UMC.,CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brouwer R, ten Klooster PM, Masselink JB, Vonkeman HE. Continuous effectiveness and safety after a hospital-wide switch to adalimumab biosimilar: An observational study in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2022; 10:e01025. [PMID: 36479936 PMCID: PMC9731312 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the maintenance of effect and safety after a hospital-wide switch for economic reasons from adalimumab originator Humira® to biosimilar Amgevita® in real-world rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and patient satisfaction with the switch. We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of RA patients on the course of their disease activity (DAS28, ESR, and CRP), health-related quality of life (SF-36), and functional disability (HAQ-DI) before and up to 1 year after the switch, supplemented with a cross-sectional survey on satisfaction and experienced side effects approximately 18 months after the switch. Treatment outcomes were analyzed with linear mixed modeling and generalized estimating equations. Of 52 RA patients sufficient data were available. Disease activity levels, the proportion of patients in remission, and SF-36 and HAQ-DI scores did not significantly change from before the switch. Overall, patients were satisfied with the switch. Three patients (7.9%) stopped the biosimilar due to side effects. In conclusion, switching to the adalimumab biosimilar did not result in increased disease activity or worse patient-reported outcomes. Also, there was no apparent evidence of increased side effects. Patients themselves were mostly satisfied with the switching experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rianne Brouwer
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Peter M. ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Joost B. Masselink
- Department of Clinical PharmacyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pouls BPH, Bekker CL, Gundogan F, Hebing RCF, van Onzenoort HAW, van de Ven LI, Vonkeman HE, Tieben R, Vriezekolk JE, van Dulmen S, Van den Bemt B. Gaming for Adherence to Medication using Ehealth in Rheumatoid arthritis (GAMER) study: a randomised controlled trial. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002616. [PMID: 36410776 PMCID: PMC9680317 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine the effect on adherence to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of a serious game that targeted implicit attitudes toward medication. Methods A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed with adults with RA that used DMARDs and possessed a smartphone/tablet. Control and intervention groups received care as usual. The intervention group played the serious game at will during 3 months. Game play data and online questionnaires Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR), Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) were collected. Primary outcome was DMARD implementation adherence operationalised as the difference in proportion of non-adherent participants (<80% taking adherence) between intervention and control group after 3 months using a Chi-squared test. Two sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were performed to test for differences on secondary outcomes. Results Of the 110 intervention participants that started the study, 87 participants (79%) installed the game and had a median playtime of 9.7 hours at 3 months. Overall, 186 participants completed the study. Adherence in intervention group (63%) and control group (54%) did not differ significantly (p=0.13) at 3 months. Neither were there differences oberved in CQR continuous score, beliefs about medication (BMQ) or clinical outcomes (HAQ and RADAI). Conclusion A serious game aimed at reinterpreting attitudes toward medication failed to show an effect on adherence to DMARDs or clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The game was played frequently indicating that it can be an effective channel for reaching patients. Trial registration number NL7217.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart P H Pouls
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Fatma Gundogan
- Pharmacy, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Renske CF Hebing
- Pharmacy, Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Centre Reade, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Hein AW van Onzenoort
- Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Tieben
- Research, Development and Innovation, Game Solutions Lab, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Healthcare Communication, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Department of Primary and Community Care Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Bart Van den Bemt
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Westerink HJ, Kosse LJ, Jessurun NT, van Tubergen A, Vonkeman HE, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bemt BJF, de Vries M. Patients' and health care professionals' perspectives on adverse drug reaction burden attributed to the use of biological DMARDs: a qualitative study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022:1-8. [PMID: 36269284 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2134344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies showed a discrepancy between health care professionals' (HCPs') and patients' perspective on adverse drug reaction (ADR) burden. However, it is unclear which factors make an ADR burdensome. We aimed to give insight in why ADRs are perceived as burdensome by inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients, and whether this differs from the HCPs' perspective. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A qualitative study was conducted using XXX. Participants received bimonthly questionnaires on experienced ADRs attributed to biological DMARDs and were asked to elaborate on ADR burden using a Likert-type scale and an open-ended question for clarification. Data of 440 IRD patients were analysed following thematic analysis. Similar analysis was done with semi-structured interviews with 13 HCPs. RESULTS We identified seven themes associated with ADR burden: 'effect on medication prescription', 'impact on appearance', 'impact on autonomy', 'impact on daily life', 'psychological consequences', 'distressing aspects of ADR', and 'physical consequences'. Identical themes were identified by HCPs, although they identified most subthemes in 'psychological consequences', and less subthemes in 'impact on daily life' and 'impact on autonomy'. CONCLUSION Patients describe perceived ADR burden in both physical and psychological themes. The HCPs' perspective is comparable, but mostly focuses on psychological impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike J Westerink
- IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Mike T Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke de Vries
- Institute for computing and Information Sciences (iCIS), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schaap G, Wensink M, Doggen CJM, van der Palen J, Vonkeman HE, Bode C. "It Really Is an Elusive Illness"-Post-COVID-19 Illness Perceptions and Recovery Strategies: A Thematic Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:13003. [PMID: 36293582 PMCID: PMC9602798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
A substantial number of patients report persisting symptoms after a COVID-19 infection: so-called post-COVID-19 syndrome. There is limited research on patients' perspectives on post-COVID-19 symptoms and ways to recover. This qualitative study explored the illness perceptions and recovery strategies of patients who had been hospitalised for COVID-19. Differences between recovered and non-recovered patients were investigated. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were held with 24 participating patients (8 recovered and 16 non-recovered) 7 to 12 months after hospital discharge. Data were interpreted using reflexive thematic analysis. Four overarching themes were identified: (I) symptoms after hospital discharge; (II) impact of COVID-19 on daily life and self-identity; (III) uncertainty about COVID-19; and (IV) dealing with COVID-19. Formerly hospitalised post-COVID-19 patients seem to have difficulties with making sense of their illness and gaining control over their recovery. The majority of non-recovered participants continue to suffer mostly from weakness or fatigue, dyspnoea and cognitive dysfunction. No notable differences in illness beliefs were observed between recovered and non-recovered participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerko Schaap
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen Wensink
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Carine J. M. Doggen
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
- Clinical Research Centre, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Job van der Palen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, 7512 KZ Enschede, The Netherlands
- Section Cognition, Data and Education, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, 7512 KZ Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Bode
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Webers C, van Tubergen A, Vonkeman HE, Boonen A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work productivity in patients with spondyloarthritis: results from the Dutch SpA-Net registry. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002447. [PMID: 36109082 PMCID: PMC9478431 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether work productivity in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) changed following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data from the Dutch SpA-Net registry were used. Work productivity was assessed with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health questionnaire. Proportions of patients employed and their overall work impairment (0%–100%) were compared during a 1-year period before (‘pre-pandemic’) and a 1-year period after the onset (‘post-onset’) of the pandemic (March 2020). Generalised estimating equation analysis of all assessments since 2016 explored whether overall work impairment (absenteeism and presenteeism) in employed patients changed with pandemic onset, adjusting for confounders. Similar analyses with disease activity as outcome were used to facilitate interpretation of work productivity results. Results Data were available during pre-pandemic and post-onset years for 204 patients. Pre-pandemic, 128 (62%) patients were employed. Post-onset, 7 (3.4%) had lost employment, while another 7 (3.4%) originally unemployed gained employment. Overall work impairment was worse following pandemic onset (37.0%) compared with pre-pandemic (27.0%) (p<0.01). Post-onset increase in overall work impairment was mainly observed in patients with lower education (B=9.57, 95% CI 5.63 to 13.51) and largely attributable to absenteeism (B=11.15, 95% CI 7.44 to 14.86). In patients with high education, no such increase was seen. Disease activity did not change with pandemic onset. Conclusions Work productivity worsened in patients with SpA after pandemic onset, especially in patients with lower education, while employment losses were limited and disease activity remained stable. Work support should be considered during the COVID-19 pandemic and thereafter for those vulnerable to adverse work outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands .,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roest LH, Kosse LJ, van Lint JA, Gosselt HR, Scholl JHG, van Puijenbroek E, Vonkeman HE, Tas SW, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bemt BJF, Jessurun NT. Disease-specific ADRs of TNF-α inhibitors as reported by patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a registry-based prospective multicenter cohort study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 22:203-211. [PMID: 36036179 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2115479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of biologics differ per immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID), and the relevance of tailoring ADR information per IMID is not fully investigated. We aimed to compare patient-reported ADRs attributed to adalimumab and etanercept between different inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS ADR reports from IRD patients were extracted from the Dutch Biologic Monitor. ADR frequencies were compared using Fischer-Freeman-Halton exact test and the influence of covariates was assessed using binomial logistic regression. RESULTS A total, of 729 participants were included, of which 354 participants reported 887 unique ADRs. ADR frequencies were not significantly different between the IRDs. Rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis including axial spondyloarthritis patients had an increased risk of ADRs related to 'Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders' and as compared to psoriatic arthritis patients. Etanercept use, combination therapy with methotrexate and/or corticosteroids, and age also influenced the risk of reporting specific ADRs. CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in frequencies and nature of patient-reported ADRs attributed to adalimumab and etanercept between different IRDs. However, more research is needed to align patients' and health-care professionals' perspectives to improve knowledge on disease-specific ADRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke H Roest
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Helen R Gosselt
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Joep H G Scholl
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Boer M, Gosselt HR, Jansen J, van Doorn MBA, Hoentjen F, Nurmohamed MT, Spuls PI, Tas SW, Vonkeman HE, Jessurun NT. Analysis and visualization of the course and burden over time of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to TNFα-inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 22:195-202. [PMID: 35946722 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2110237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate course and burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNFα-inhibitors in IRD-patients, and whether Sankey diagrams and polar plots can visualize this. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data on ADRs experienced during the Dutch Biologic Monitor (January 2017 till December 2022) were used in this study. We selected IRD-patients using a TNFα-inhibitor, reporting skin reactions/infections/injection site reactions and completing ≥3 questionnaires (i.e. the initial report and ≥2 follow-ups). Course was scored as worsening/improving/remaining stable/resolving and as (non-)recurrent. Patients scored burden from 1 (no burden) to 5 (very high burden). Sankey diagrams and polar plots visualized this. RESULTS 202 patients were included, reporting 353 ADRs. Most skin reactions were stable (25.0%). Most infections resolved (50.8%). Injection site reactions were mostly recurrent (72.3%). Skin reactions and infections tended to decrease in burden . Infections had highest burden at start, which mostly decreased over time. Injection site reactions had a low and stable burden. CONCLUSIONS Skin reactions attributed to TNFα-inhibitors by IRD-patients are stable with a slightly decreasing burden over time. Infections have highest burden at start but resolved mostly. Injection site reactions have a low and stable burden. Sankey diagrams and polar plots are suitable to visualize this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel de Boer
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Helen R Gosselt
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan Jansen
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn B A van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health/Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Linschoten M, Uijl A, Schut A, Jakob CEM, Romão LR, Bell RM, McFarlane E, Stecher M, Zondag AGM, van Iperen EPA, Hermans-van Ast W, Lea NC, Schaap J, Jewbali LS, Smits PC, Patel RS, Aujayeb A, van der Harst P, Siebelink HJ, van Smeden M, Williams S, Pilgram L, van Gilst WH, Tieleman RG, Williams B, Asselbergs FW, Al-Ali AK, Al-Muhanna FA, Al-Rubaish AM, Al-Windy NYY, Alkhalil M, Almubarak YA, Alnafie AN, Alshahrani M, Alshehri AM, Anning C, Anthonio RL, Badings EA, Ball C, van Beek EA, ten Berg JM, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Bianco M, Blagova OV, Bleijendaal H, Bor WL, Borgmann S, van Boxem AJM, van den Brink FS, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, van Bussel BCT, Byrom-Goulthorp R, Captur G, Caputo M, Charlotte N, vom Dahl J, Dark P, De Sutter J, Degenhardt C, Delsing CE, Dolff S, Dorman HGR, Drost JT, Eberwein L, Emans ME, Er AG, Ferreira JB, Forner MJ, Friedrichs A, Gabriel L, Groenemeijer BE, Groenendijk AL, Grüner B, Guggemos W, Haerkens-Arends HE, Hanses F, Hedayat B, Heigener D, van der Heijden DJ, Hellou E, Hellwig K, Henkens MTHM, Hermanides RS, Hermans WRM, van Hessen MWJ, Heymans SRB, Hilt AD, van der Horst ICC, Hower M, van Ierssel SH, Isberner N, Jensen B, Kearney MT, van Kesteren HAM, Kielstein JT, Kietselaer BLJH, Kochanek M, Kolk MZH, Koning AMH, Kopylov PY, Kuijper AFM, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Lanznaster J, van der Linden MMJM, van der Lingen ACJ, Linssen GCM, Lomas D, Maarse M, Macías Ruiz R, Magdelijns FJH, Magro M, Markart P, Martens FMAC, Mazzilli SG, McCann GP, van der Meer P, Meijs MFL, Merle U, Messiaen P, Milovanovic M, Monraats PS, Montagna L, Moriarty A, Moss AJ, Mosterd A, Nadalin S, Nattermann J, Neufang M, Nierop PR, Offerhaus JA, van Ofwegen-Hanekamp CEE, Parker E, Persoon AM, Piepel C, Pinto YM, Poorhosseini H, Prasad S, Raafs AG, Raichle C, Rauschning D, Redón J, Reidinga AC, Ribeiro MIA, Riedel C, Rieg S, Ripley DP, Römmele C, Rothfuss K, Rüddel J, Rüthrich MM, Salah R, Saneei E, Saxena M, Schellings DAAM, Scholte NTB, Schubert J, Seelig J, Shafiee A, Shore AC, Spinner C, Stieglitz S, Strauss R, Sturkenboom NH, Tessitore E, Thomson RJ, Timmermans P, Tio RA, Tjong FVY, Tometten L, Trauth J, den Uil CA, Van Craenenbroeck EM, van Veen HPAA, Vehreschild MJGT, Veldhuis LI, Veneman T, Verschure DO, Voigt I, de Vries JK, van de Wal RMA, Walter L, van de Watering DJ, Westendorp ICD, Westendorp PHM, Westhoff T, Weytjens C, Wierda E, Wille K, de With K, Worm M, Woudstra P, Wu KW, Zaal R, Zaman AG, van der Zee PM, Zijlstra LE, Alling TE, Ahmed R, van Aken K, Bayraktar-Verver ECE, Bermúdez Jiménes FJ, Biolé CA, den Boer-Penning P, Bontje M, Bos M, Bosch L, Broekman M, Broeyer FJF, de Bruijn EAW, Bruinsma S, Cardoso NM, Cosyns B, van Dalen DH, Dekimpe E, Domange J, van Doorn JL, van Doorn P, Dormal F, Drost IMJ, Dunnink A, van Eck JWM, Elshinawy K, Gevers RMM, Gognieva DG, van der Graaf M, Grangeon S, Guclu A, Habib A, Haenen NA, Hamilton K, Handgraaf S, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks-van Woerden M, Hessels-Linnemeijer BM, Hosseini K, Huisman J, Jacobs TC, Jansen SE, Janssen A, Jourdan K, ten Kate GL, van Kempen MJ, Kievit CM, Kleikers P, Knufman N, van der Kooi SE, Koole BAS, Koole MAC, Kui KK, Kuipers-Elferink L, Lemoine I, Lensink E, van Marrewijk V, van Meerbeeck JP, Meijer EJ, Melein AJ, Mesitskaya DF, van Nes CPM, Paris FMA, Perrelli MG, Pieterse-Rots A, Pisters R, Pölkerman BC, van Poppel A, Reinders S, Reitsma MJ, Ruiter AH, Selder JL, van der Sluis A, Sousa AIC, Tajdini M, Tercedor Sánchez L, Van De Heyning CM, Vial H, Vlieghe E, Vonkeman HE, Vreugdenhil P, de Vries TAC, Willems AM, Wils AM, Zoet-Nugteren SK. Clinical presentation, disease course, and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease: a cohort study across 18 countries. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:1104-1120. [PMID: 34734634 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Patients with cardiac disease are considered high risk for poor outcomes following hospitalization with COVID-19. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate heterogeneity in associations between various heart disease subtypes and in-hospital mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS We used data from the CAPACITY-COVID registry and LEOSS study. Multivariable Poisson regression models were fitted to assess the association between different types of pre-existing heart disease and in-hospital mortality. A total of 16 511 patients with COVID-19 were included (21.1% aged 66-75 years; 40.2% female) and 31.5% had a history of heart disease. Patients with heart disease were older, predominantly male, and often had other comorbid conditions when compared with those without. Mortality was higher in patients with cardiac disease (29.7%; n = 1545 vs. 15.9%; n = 1797). However, following multivariable adjustment, this difference was not significant [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.15; P = 0.12 (corrected for multiple testing)]. Associations with in-hospital mortality by heart disease subtypes differed considerably, with the strongest association for heart failure (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30; P < 0.018) particularly for severe (New York Heart Association class III/IV) heart failure (aRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20-1.64; P < 0.018). None of the other heart disease subtypes, including ischaemic heart disease, remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Serious cardiac complications were diagnosed in <1% of patients. CONCLUSION Considerable heterogeneity exists in the strength of association between heart disease subtypes and in-hospital mortality. Of all patients with heart disease, those with heart failure are at greatest risk of death when hospitalized with COVID-19. Serious cardiac complications are rare during hospitalization.
Collapse
|
24
|
Geeven IPAC, Jessurun NT, Wasylewicz ATM, Drent M, Spuls PI, Hoentjen F, van Puijenbroek EP, Vonkeman HE, Grootens KP, van Doorn MBA, van Den Bemt BJF, Bekkers CL. Barriers and facilitators for systematically registering adverse drug reactions in electronic health records: a qualitative study with Dutch healthcare professionals. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 21:699-706. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2020756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isa P. A. C. Geeven
- Research Department, Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T. Jessurun
- Research Department, Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein Drent
- Department of Pulmonology, St Antonius Hospital, Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) Center of Excellence, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- ild Care Foundation Research Team, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I. Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health and Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène P. van Puijenbroek
- Research Department, Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Reinier van Arkel Mental health Institution, Department of Geriatric and Hospital Psychiatry, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherland
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P. Grootens
- Renier van Arkel Mental Health Insitutute ‘S Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart J. F. van Den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Bekkers
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ten Klooster PM, Kraiss JT, Munters R, Vonkeman HE. Generalized pain hypersensitivity and associated factors in gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3640-3646. [PMID: 34919669 PMCID: PMC9434280 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies have indicated that a sizeable proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis present with features characteristic of central pain sensitization. However, this has not yet been examined in patients with gout. The objective of this study was to explore the presence of generalized pain hypersensitivity and associated factors in patients with diagnosed gout. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was performed in outpatients with crystal proven gout using the generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ) to screen for the presence of generalized pain hypersensitivity. Additional self-reported socio-demographic and medical information was collected and several patient-reported outcome measures were completed. Univariable logistic regressions and multivariable LASSO regression analysis with 10-fold cross-validation was used to explore relationships with patient characteristics, clinical features and PROMs. RESULTS Of the 97 included patients (84.5% male; mean ± standard deviation age: 68.9 ± 11.9 years), 20 patients (20.6%, 95% CI: 13.0-30.0) reported possible generalized pain hypersensitivity defined as a GPQ score ≥11 (range: 0-28; mean ± standard deviation GPQ: 6.3 ± 5.3). Lower age, concomitant fibromyalgia, and more experienced difficulties in performing their social role were independently associated with generalized pain hypersensitivity. Notably, use of urate lowering therapy was significantly lower in those with generalized pain hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Generalized pain hypersensitivity appears to be quite common in gout, despite its more intermittent nature compared with other inflammatory arthritides. As this kind of pain does not respond well to regular treatment, screening for non-inflammatory pain may be important for improving pain management in gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jannis T Kraiss
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Munters
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Lint JA, van Hunsel FPAM, Tas SW, Vonkeman HE, Hoentjen F, van Doorn MBA, Hebing RCF, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bemt BJF, van Puijenbroek EP, Jessurun NT. Hypoglycaemia following JAK inhibitor treatment in patients with diabetes. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:597-599. [PMID: 34916208 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jette A van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, location AMC, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Renske C F Hebing
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Metselaar JM, Middelink LM, Wortel CH, Bos R, van Laar JM, Vonkeman HE, Westhovens R, Lammers T, Yao SL, Kothekar M, Raut A, Bijlsma JWJ. Intravenous pegylated liposomal prednisolone outperforms intramuscular methylprednisolone in treating rheumatoid arthritis flares: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Control Release 2021; 341:548-554. [PMID: 34896445 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory drugs but their use is limited by systemic exposure leading to toxicity. Targeted GC delivery to sites of inflammation via encapsulation in long-circulating liposomes may improve the therapeutic index. We performed a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center study in which intravenously (i.v.) administered pegylated liposomal prednisolone sodium phosphate (Nanocort) was compared to equipotent intramuscular (i.m.) methylprednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol®; i.e. a current standards-of-care for treating flares in rheumatoid arthritis patients). We enrolled 172 patients with active arthritis who met all eligibility criteria, eventually resulting in 150 patients randomized in three groups: (1) Nanocort 75 mg i.v. infusion plus i.m. saline injection; (2) Nanocort 150 mg i.v. infusion plus i.m. saline injection; and (3) Depo-Medrol® 120 mg i.m. injection plus i.v. saline infusion. Dosing in each group occurred at baseline and on day 15 (week 2). Study visits occurred at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12, to assess both efficacy and safety. The primary endpoint was the "European League Against Rheumatism" (EULAR) responder rate at week 1. Safety was determined by the occurrence of adverse events during treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. Treatment with Nanocort was found to be superior to Depo-Medrol® in terms of EULAR response at week 1, with p-values of 0.007 (good response) and 0.018 (moderate response). Treatments were well tolerated with a comparable pattern of adverse events in the three treatment groups. However, the Nanocort groups had a higher incidence of hypersensitivity reactions during liposome infusion. Our results show that liposomal Nanocort is more effective than Depo-Medrol® in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis flares and has similar safety. This is the first clinical study in a large patient population showing that i.v. administered targeted drug delivery with a nanomedicine formulation improves the therapeutic index of glucocorticoids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josbert M Metselaar
- Department of Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Enceladus, Naarden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente and University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center and University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Twan Lammers
- Department of Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Siu-Long Yao
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Cranbury, NJ, USA
| | | | - Atul Raut
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Van Lint JA, Bakker T, Ten Klooster PM, van Puijenbroek EP, Vonkeman HE, Jessurun NT. Neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions associated with low dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:417-423. [PMID: 34739327 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2003328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions (NPADRs) are not commonly associated with low dose methotrexate (LDMTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this case series assessment, we described the nature and frequency of NPADRs with LDMTX in the Dutch DREAM-RA registry, including causality of NPADRs, the impact on further LDMTX treatment and the impact on patient reported Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). RESULTS A total of 71 NPADRs (frequency 6.8%) associated with LDMTX were captured in the DREAM-RA registry. NPADRs were registered for 62 (5.9%) out of 1048 patients with 10.9 NPADRs per 1000 patient years. Headache, dizziness and depression were most frequently reported. The causality was considered probable for 67 NPADRs (94.4%) and definite for 1 NPADR (1.4%). NPADRs led to LDMTX withdrawal in 34 cases (47.9%) and was not restarted in 16 cases (47.1%). Median mental HRQoL was significantly decreased around the occurrence of the NPADR and remained significantly lower after the event. Median physical HRQoL was not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge on the nature, frequency and impact of the demonstrated NPADRs during LDMTX therapy will enhance attention toward these potential ADRs allowing better risk assessment and communication to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jette A Van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Bakker
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Transparency in Healthcare B.V, Hengelo, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Terwee CB, Zuidgeest M, Vonkeman HE, Cella D, Haverman L, Roorda LD. Common patient-reported outcomes across ICHOM Standard Sets: the potential contribution of PROMIS®. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:259. [PMID: 34488730 PMCID: PMC8420145 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01624-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) develops condition-specific Standard Sets of outcomes to be measured in clinical practice for value-based healthcare evaluation. Standard Sets are developed by different working groups, which is inefficient and may lead to inconsistencies in selected PROs and PROMs. We aimed to identify common PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets and examined to what extend these PROs can be measured with a generic set of PROMs: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). METHODS We extracted all PROs and recommended PROMs from 39 ICHOM Standard Sets. Similar PROs were categorized into unique PRO concepts. We examined which of these PRO concepts can be measured with PROMIS. RESULTS A total of 307 PROs were identified in 39 ICHOM Standard Sets and 114 unique PROMs are recommended for measuring these PROs. The 307 PROs could be categorized into 22 unique PRO concepts. More than half (17/22) of these PRO concepts (covering about 75% of the PROs and 75% of the PROMs) can be measured with a PROMIS measure. CONCLUSION Considerable overlap was found in PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets, and large differences in terminology used and PROMs recommended, even for the same PROs. We recommend a more universal and standardized approach to the selection of PROs and PROMs. Such an approach, focusing on a set of core PROs for all patients, measured with a system like PROMIS, may provide more opportunities for patient-centered care and facilitate the uptake of Standard Sets in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Beckers E, Been M, Webers C, Boonen A, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Performance of three composite measures for disease activity in peripheral spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 2021; 49:256-264. [PMID: 34470791 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.210075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate concurrent validity and discrimination of the Disease Activity Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) in clinical practice. METHODS Data from a Dutch registry for SpA (SpA-Net) were used. Predefined hypotheses on concurrent validity of the composite measures with 15 other outcome measures of disease activity, physical function and health-related quality of life were tested. Concurrent validity was considered acceptable if ≥75% of the hypotheses were confirmed. Discrimination was assessed by stratifying patients in DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS predefined disease activity states and studying mean differences in health outcomes by one-way ANOVA. Furthermore, the concordance in disease activity states was determined. All analyses were repeated in subgroups with and without psoriasis. RESULTS DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS scores were available for 191, 139 and 279 patients with pSpA, respectively. The concurrent validity and discrimination of all composite measures were acceptable as the strength of correlations were as hypothesized in ≥75% of the studied correlations. With increasing disease activity states, scores in nearly all outcome measures worsened significantly. The DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS classified 22%, 56% and 48% of the patients, respectively, in the two highest disease activity states. Stratified analyses for concomitant psoriasis revealed no relevant subgroup differences. CONCLUSION The performance of DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS in pSpA was acceptable, and independent of concomitant psoriasis. Due to discrepancy in classification, the validity of existing thresholds for disease activity states warrants further study in pSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Beckers
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marin Been
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Casper Webers
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding declaration: SpA-Net was financially supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; project number 836042001) and Dutch Arthritis Society, and was additionally sponsored by Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Data availability statement: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Address correspondence to Esther Beckers, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kosse LJ, Weits G, Vonkeman HE, Tas SW, Hoentjen F, Van Doorn MB, Spuls PI, D'Haens GR, Nurmohamed MT, van Puijenbroek EP, Van Den Bemt BJ, Jessurun NT. Patients' perspectives on a drug safety monitoring system for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases based on patient-reported outcomes. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1565-1572. [PMID: 34348543 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1963436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are increasingly used in cohort event monitoring (CEM) to obtain a better understanding of patients' real-world experience with drugs. Despite the leading role for patients, little is known about their perspectives on CEM systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a cross-sectional open survey following the rationale of the Technology Acceptance Model, we aimed to obtain insight in patients' perspectives on the perceived usefulness, ease of use and attitude toward using a PRO-based drug safety monitoring system for ADRs attributed to biologics. RESULTS Patients considered structural reporting of ADRs in web-based questionnaires as useful and not burdensome. It was preferred to link the questionnaire frequency to regular hospital consultations or the biologic administration schedule. Various respondents were interested in sharing questionnaires with their medical specialist (49.0%) or pharmacist (34.2%), and suggested to minimize the questionnaire frequency in case of an unaltered situation or absence of ADRs. CONCLUSIONS Patients' perspectives should be considered in the setup of PRO-based CEM studies, as this contributes to data quality and patient centeredness. Since incorporation of patients' perspectives in CEM studies is indispensable, a delicate balance should be found between user-friendliness and study aims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Gerda Weits
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Immunity and Infections, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert R D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- Department of Rheumatology, Reade and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Jf Van Den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Versteeg GA, Steunebrink L, Vonkeman HE, Ten Klooster PM, Van Der Bijl AE, Van De Laar M. Early radiological progression remains associated with long-term joint damage in real-world rheumatoid arthritis patients treated to the target of remission. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:87-96. [PMID: 34151716 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1917161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate radiological damage and to explore characteristics associated with radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated to the target of remission in a real-world setting.Method: Baseline to 6 year follow-up data were used from an observational early RA cohort. Radiographs of hands and feet at baseline, 6 months, and 1, 3, and 6 years were scored using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). The threshold for rapid radiological progression (RRP) after 6 months was based on the calculated smallest detectable change of 3.95. Negative binomial generalized linear mixed model and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine which variables were associated with RRP and 6 year radiological progression.Results: Most radiological damage occurred in the first year of treatment [median 2.0 interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-4.0 SHS points] compared to the subsequent 5 years of follow-up (median 3.0 IQR 1.0-5.0 SHS points). While low disease activity was achieved within 6 months on average, 18.8% of the patients developed RRP. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positivity [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.42, p = 0.03], baseline erosive disease (IRR 1.60, p = 0.02), and RRP (IRR 3.28, p < 0.001) were associated with 6 year radiological progression. Erosive disease was the strongest predictor of RRP (odds ratio 8.8, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Long-term radiological outcome is limited in most real-world RA patients treated to the target of remission, but RRP still occurs. Anti-CCP positivity, baseline erosive disease, and RRP remain associated with long-term radiological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Versteeg
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Lmm Steunebrink
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - H E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Arthritis Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - P M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - A E Van Der Bijl
- Department of Rheumatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Mafj Van De Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Arthritis Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Lint JA, Jessurun NT, Tas SW, van den Bemt BJF, Nurmohamed MT, van Doorn MBA, Spuls PI, van Tubergen AM, Ten Klooster PM, van Puijenbroek EP, Hoentjen F, Vonkeman HE. Gastrointestinal Adverse Drug Reaction Profile of Etanercept: Real-world Data From Patients and Healthcare Professionals. J Rheumatol 2021; 48:1388-1394. [PMID: 33993115 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the nature and frequency of gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions (GI-ADRs) of etanercept (ETN) using patient-reported and healthcare professional (HCP)-registered data and compared this frequency with the GI-ADR frequency of the widely used tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor adalimumab (ADA). METHODS Reported GI-ADRs of ETN for rheumatic diseases were collected from the Dutch Biologic Monitor and DREAM registries. We described the clinical course of GI-ADRs and compared the frequency with ADA in both data sources using Fisher exact test. RESULTS Out of 416 patients using ETN for inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the Dutch Biologic Monitor, 25 (6%) patients reported 36 GI-ADRs. In the DREAM registries 11 GI-ADRs were registered for 9 patients (2.3%), out of 399 patients using ETN, with an incidence of 7.1 per 1000 patient-years. Most GI-ADRs consisted of diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain. GI-ADRs led to ETN discontinuation in 1 patient (4%) and dose adjustment in 4 (16%) in the Dutch Biologic Monitor. Eight GI-ADRs (73%) led to ETN discontinuation in the DREAM registries. The frequency of GI-ADRs of ETN did not significantly differ from GI-ADRs of ADA in both data sources (Dutch Biologic Monitor: ETN 8.7% vs ADA 5.3%, P = 0.07; DREAM: ETN 2.8% vs ADA 4.7%, P = 0.16). CONCLUSION Most GI-ADRs associated with ETN concerned gastrointestinal symptoms. These ADRs may lead to dose adjustment or ETN discontinuation. The frequency of ETN-associated GI-ADRs was comparable to the frequency of ADA-associated GI-ADRs. Knowledge about these previously unknown ADRs can facilitate early recognition and improve patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jette A van Lint
- J.A. van Lint, PharmD, N.T. Jessurun, PharmD, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch;
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- J.A. van Lint, PharmD, N.T. Jessurun, PharmD, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch
| | - Sander W Tas
- S.W. Tas, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology & immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- B.J.F. van den Bemt, PharmD, Prof. Dr., Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, and Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam Rheumatology & immunology Center (ARC), Reade, and Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam
| | - Martijn B A van Doorn
- M.B. van Doorn, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- P.I. Spuls, MD, Prof. Dr., Department of Dermatology, Public Health and Epidemiology, Immunity and Infections, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
| | - Astrid M van Tubergen
- A.M. van Tubergen, MD, Prof. Dr., Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- P.M. ten Klooster, PhD, Transparency in Healthcare BV, Hengelo, and Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede
| | - Eugene P van Puijenbroek
- E.P. van Puijenbroek, MD, Prof. Dr., Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, and Department of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- F. Hoentjen, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- H.E. Vonkeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hegeman MC, Schoemaker-Delsing JA, Luttikholt JTM, Vonkeman HE. Patient perspectives on how to improve education on medication side effects: cross-sectional observational study at a rheumatology clinic in The Netherlands. Rheumatol Int 2021; 41:973-979. [PMID: 33730208 PMCID: PMC8019410 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04815-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients often report lacking information on medication side effects. The aims of this study were to observe how rheumatology healthcare providers deliver medication information and to determine in which specific domains information is missing. First, 12 single-blinded structured observations were performed during regular RA patient consultations. The observers noted whether and how medication and medication side effects were discussed. Second, 100 RA patients were asked to fill out an adaptation of the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS). Medication was discussed during all observed consultations. With new medication, its purpose and mode of action were explained in all cases, but possible side effects in only 33%. Overall, medication side effects were discussed in 58% of consultations. Most information delivery was verbal (92%). Response rate to the questionnaire was 61%. Overall satisfaction with medication education was mean 7.3 (± 1.9) (NRS 0-10) with a comparable high SIMS total satisfaction sum score of mean 12.3 (± 4.4). At subscale score levels, 89% were satisfied with the amount of information on the action and usage of medication, but only 47% with the information on the potential problems of medication. RA patients express overall high satisfaction with their medication education but there is still an unmet need for information on potential risks and side effects. Using the SIMS questionnaire in daily clinical practice may help focus medication education to the needs of the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam C Hegeman
- Department Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. .,Department Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bos WH, van Tubergen A, Vonkeman HE. Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic; a positive experience in the Netherlands. Rheumatol Int 2021; 41:565-573. [PMID: 33449162 PMCID: PMC7809638 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04771-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To describe the delivery of care for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) from the perspective of rheumatologists in the Netherlands during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed methods design was used with quantitative and qualitative data from a cross-sectional survey sent to all members of the Dutch Rheumatology Society in May 2020. The survey contained questions on demographics, the current way of care delivery, and also on usage, acceptance, facilitators and barriers of telemedicine. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. The answers to the open questions were categorized into themes. Seventy-five respondents completed the survey. During the COVID-19 pandemic, continuity of care was guaranteed through telephone and video consultations by 99% and 9% of the respondents, respectively. More than 80% of the total number of outpatient visits were performed exclusively via telephone with in-person visits only on indication. One-quarter of the respondents used patient reported outcomes to guide telephone consultations. The top three facilitators for telemedicine were less travel time for patients, ease of use of the system and shorter waiting period for patients. The top three barriers were impossibility to perform physical examination, difficulty estimating how the patient is doing and difficulty in reaching patients. During the COVID-19 epidemic, care for patients with RMDs in the Netherlands continued uninterrupted by the aid of telemedicine. On average, respondents were content with current solutions, although some felt insecure mainly because of the inability to perform physical examination and missing nonverbal communication with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H Bos
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Centre for eHealth and Well-Being Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Giraud EL, Jessurun NT, van Hunsel FPAM, van Puijenbroek EP, van Tubergen A, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE. Frequency of real-world reported adverse drug reactions in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1617-1624. [PMID: 32990050 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1830058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the cumulative incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from real-world data (RWD), using the DREAM-RA registry, and to compare these with incidence frequencies mentioned in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). METHODS All ADRs in patients with recorded use of adalimumab, etanercept, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, oral and subcutaneous methotrexate, and sulfasalazine from a single center participating in the DREAM-RA registry (n = 1,098 patients) that were directly sent to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Center Lareb were assessed. Cumulative incidences were calculated, described and compared to the most recently revised SmPCs. RESULTS In total, 14 ADRs (≥5 case reports) associated with the use of one of the included DMARDs were reported with a higher estimated cumulative incidence compared to the SmPC. For hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine, 5 ADRs (≥5 case reports) mentioned with an 'unknown' incidence in the SmPC were reported as 'common' in this study. CONCLUSIONS Although ADR data in the DREAM-RA registry were partly comparable with data in the SmPCs, RWD from this patient registry provided an added value to the currently available information on the incidences of ADRs associated with DMARDs in RA patients as described in SmPCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline L Giraud
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Transparency in Healthcare B.v ., Hengelo, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente , Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente , Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kosse LJ, Jessurun NT, Vonkeman HE, Tas SW, Nurmohamed MT, Hoentjen F, van Doorn MB, van Puijenbroek EP, van den Bemt BJ, de Vries M. Stakeholders’ perspectives on a patient-reported outcome measure-based drug safety monitoring system for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1521-1528. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1803826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne J. Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T. Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W. Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike T. Nurmohamed
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B.A. van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène P. van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J.F. van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke de Vries
- Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kosse LJ, Weits G, Vonkeman HE, Spuls PI, Van Den Bemt BJF, Tas SW, Hoentjen F, Nurmohamed MT, Van Doorn MBA, Van Puijenbroek EP, Jessurun NT. Immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients' preferences in adverse drug reaction information regarding biologics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1049-1054. [PMID: 32524887 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1781090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in studies and medical practice to obtain information on patients' perspectives toward their treatment or disease. However, most study outcomes are primarily directed at healthcare professionals. It was aimed to obtain insight in which type of information immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients prefer to receive after participating in the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), a PRO-based prospective cohort event monitoring system focused on adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS A survey was conducted among DBM participants that wanted information about the results. Patients' preferences were identified using twelve statements and rated with five-point Likert-type scales. Subgroup analyses and differences between statements were performed using Mann-Whitney U Tests. RESULTS The survey was completed by 591 patients (response rate 67.6%). Most respondents had inflammatory rheumatic diseases (76.8%) and used adalimumab (37.2%) or etanercept (33.2%). Respondents preferred results per IMID over aggregated results (p = <0.001). Information on whether patients with similar IMIDs experience ADRs (average 4.5), which biologics are most likely to cause ADRs (4.4) and whether ADRs disappear (4.4) were most interesting. CONCLUSION DBM participants prefer to receive disease-specific information on ADRs that is tailored to their own biologic and IMID, including the outcome of ADRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Gerda Weits
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente and University of Twente , Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health and Epidemiology, Immunity and Infections , The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F Van Den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek , Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC) , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mike T Nurmohamed
- Department Rheumatology, Reade & Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC) , The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B A Van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène P Van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Snel FW, Kootstra GJ, Vonkeman HE. [A man with painful shins]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2020; 164:D4671. [PMID: 32749799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
A 55-year-old man was evaluated at the outpatient rheumatology clinic with painful shins since 6 weeks. He also had a maculopapular rash on his trunk. Bone scintigraphy showed bilateral tibia periostitis. Serologic testing for syphilis was positive matching active infection. The diagnosis secondary syphilis with bilateral tibia periostitis was made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank W Snel
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede. Afd. Reumatologie
- Contact: Frank W. Snel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Beckers E, Webers C, Boonen A, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Validation and implementation of a patient-reported experience measure for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis in the Netherlands. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2889-2897. [PMID: 32318970 PMCID: PMC7497348 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To test the psychometric properties of the United Kingdom’s Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to implement this questionnaire in daily practice in the Netherlands. Methods After a forward-backward translation procedure into Dutch, the CQRA-PREM was tested into two quality registries in daily practice. Face validity was assessed with focus group interviews. Feasibility was evaluated through completion times and interpretability of domain scores through floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficients) and homogeneity (corrected item-total correlations) were determined. Divergent validity was assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs) between the average scores of domains and outcome measures. The CQRA-PREM was implemented in daily practice, and the results were used in quality improvement cycles. Results Face validity of the CQRA-PREM was good. The CQRA-PREM was completed by 282 patients with SpA and 376 with RA. Median time to complete the CQRA-PREM was 4.7 min. Ceiling effects were found in three out of seven domains. Internal consistency of nearly all domains was considered good (0.65 ≤ α ≤ 0.95). Thresholds for homogeneity were exceeded within three domains (rp > 0.7), suggesting item redundancy. Divergent validity showed that nearly all domains of the CQRA-PREM were at most weakly correlated with outcomes measures (− 0.3 ≤ rs ≤ 0.3). The CQRA-PREM could identify areas of improvement for providing patient-centered care. Conclusion The CQRA-PREM has acceptable psychometric properties and has shown to be a useful tool in evaluating quality of care from the patients’ perspective in the Netherlands. Trial registration SpA-Net is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR6740). Key Points • The Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) is a valid measure for assessing patient-centeredness of rheumatology care. • The Dutch version of the CQRA-PREM shows acceptable psychometric properties. • The CQRA-PREM shows to be a useful tool in Plan-Do-Check-Act quality improvement cycles in the Netherlands. • The CQRA-PREM can be used for benchmarking and quality improvement of rheumatology services. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10067-020-05076-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Beckers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Oude Voshaar MAH, Das Gupta Z, Bijlsma JWJ, Boonen A, Chau J, Courvoisier DS, Curtis JR, Ellis B, Ernestam S, Gossec L, Hale C, Hornjeff J, Leung KYY, Lidar M, Mease P, Michaud K, Mody GM, Ndosi M, Opava CH, Pinheiro GRC, Salt M, Soriano ER, Taylor WJ, Voshaar MJH, Weel AEAM, de Wit M, Wulffraat N, van de Laar MAFJ, Vonkeman HE. International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Set of Outcomes That Matter to People Living With Inflammatory Arthritis: Consensus From an International Working Group. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 71:1556-1565. [PMID: 30358135 PMCID: PMC6900179 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Objective The implementation of value‐based health care in inflammatory arthritis requires a standardized set of modifiable outcomes and risk‐adjustment variables that is feasible to implement worldwide. Methods The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a multidisciplinary working group that consisted of 24 experts from 6 continents, including 6 patient representatives, to develop a standard set of outcomes for inflammatory arthritis. The process followed a structured approach, using a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the following decision areas: conditions covered by the set, outcome domains, outcome measures, and risk‐adjustment variables. Consensus in areas 2 to 4 were supported by systematic literature reviews and consultation of experts. Results The ICHOM Inflammatory Arthritis Standard Set covers patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We recommend that outcomes regarding pain, fatigue, activity limitations, overall physical and mental health impact, work/school/housework ability and productivity, disease activity, and serious adverse events be collected at least annually. Validated measures for patient‐reported outcomes were endorsed and linked to common reporting metrics. Age, sex at birth, education level, smoking status, comorbidities, time since diagnosis, and rheumatoid factor and anti‐citrullinated protein antibody lab testing for RA and JIA should be collected as risk‐adjustment variables. Conclusion We present the ICHOM inflammatory arthritis Standard Set of outcomes, which enables health care providers to implement the value‐based health care framework and compare outcomes that are important to patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zofia Das Gupta
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | | | - Annelies Boonen
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Chau
- Hong Kong Psoriatic Arthritis Association, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Laure Gossec
- Sorbonne Université and Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Katy Y Y Leung
- Singapore General Hospital, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Phillip Mease
- Providence St. Joseph Health System, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, and the National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Salt
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | - Enrique R Soriano
- Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Maarten de Wit
- VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Wulffraat
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, and International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, and International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ten Klooster PM, de Graaf N, Vonkeman HE. Association between pain phenotype and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a non-interventional, longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21:257. [PMID: 31783899 PMCID: PMC6884878 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-019-2042-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) without significant joint damage, a substantial proportion of patients complain of persistent pain. Previous studies have identified different pain phenotypes in RA, in which non-nociceptive pain phenotypes are associated with higher concurrent disease activity scores. In this longitudinal study, we explored associations between pain phenotypes and long-term disease activity outcome in RA patients. Secondly, we explored whether pain phenotype is associated with comorbid conditions. METHODS One hundred eighty established RA patients were classified with a nociceptive (61%) or a non-nociceptive (39%) pain phenotype, based on their responses to the painDETECT-questionnaire. Two years of clinical follow-up data on disease activity outcomes were collected. Information on comorbid diseases was derived from electronic patient files. RESULTS Patients with a non-nociceptive pain phenotype showed higher mean disease activity scores (DAS28, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.37-2.77 vs. 2.11; 95% CI, 1.94-2.27; p < 0.001) and a twofold lower chance of achieving sustained DAS28 remission (OR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; p = 0.020). Only the tender joint count and patient global health significantly differed between the pain phenotype groups. Patients with a non-nociceptive pain phenotype had more often been diagnosed with concurrent fibromyalgia (9.9% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.007) and other pain-associated comorbid diseases (52.1% vs. 35.8%; p = 0.030) compared with patients with a nociceptive pain phenotype. CONCLUSION This longitudinal study showed consistently worse long-term disease activity outcomes in RA patients with a non-nociceptive pain phenotype which appeared to be mainly due to differences in the subjective components of the disease activity score. TRIAL REGISTRATION The DREAM cohort study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register: NTR578.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Ten Klooster
- Centre for eHealth and Well-being Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - N de Graaf
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - H E Vonkeman
- Centre for eHealth and Well-being Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Janssen CA, Oude Voshaar MAH, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MAFJ. Development and validation of a patient-reported gout attack intensity score for use in gout clinical studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:1928-1934. [PMID: 30859221 PMCID: PMC6812713 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inflammation-related symptoms such as pain, swelling and tenderness of the affected joint are frequently assessed using 5-point diary rating scales in gout clinical trials. Combining these into a single gout attack symptom intensity score may be a useful summary measure for these data, which is potentially more responsive to change compared with the individual components. The objective of this study was to develop a patient-reported gout flare intensity score, the Gout Attack Intensity Score (GAIS), for use in clinical studies, that includes components for gout-related pain, swelling and tenderness. METHODS Data from a randomized controlled trial comparing anakinra to standard of care for the treatment of acute gout attacks were used for this study. A 7-day flare diary was completed by patients, including questions relating to intensity of pain, swelling and tenderness (5-point rating scales). Scalability of these items was assessed using Mokken Scale Analysis, and reliability using greatest lower bound reliability coefficients. Known-groups validity was evaluated, as well as the responsiveness to change and the presence of floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS Scalability of the single items was supported, and GAIS scores were reliable (greatest lower bound >0.80). GAIS scores demonstrated responsiveness to change with high effect sizes (>0.8), and discriminated better between responders and non-responders compared with its single-item components. No floor and ceiling effects were found. CONCLUSION The GAIS seems to be a reliable and responsive instrument for assessing patient-reported gout attack intensity that may be used in gout clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly A Janssen
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
van de Laar CJ, Oude Voshaar MAH, Vonkeman HE. Cost-effectiveness of different treat-to-target strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the DREAM registry. BMC Rheumatol 2019; 3:16. [PMID: 31168521 PMCID: PMC6487515 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-019-0064-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adjusting medication of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) until predefined disease activity targets are met, i.e. Treat-to-Target (T2T), is the currently recommended treatment approach. However, not much is known about long-term cost-effectiveness of different T2T strategies. We model the 5-year costs and effects of a step-up approach (MTX mono - > MTX + csDMARD combination - > Adalimumab - > second anti-TNF) and an initial combination therapy approach (MTX + csDMARD - > MTX + csDMARD higher dose - > anti-TNFs) from the healthcare and societal perspectives, by adapting a previously validated Markov model. Methods We constructed a Markov model in which 3-monthly transitions between DAS28-defined health states of remission (≤2.6), low (2.6 < DAS28 ≤ 3.2), moderate (3.2 < DAS28 ≤ 5.1), and high disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1) were simulated. Modelled patients proceeded to subsequent treatments in case of non-remission at each (3-month) cycle start. In case of remission for two consecutive cycles medication was tapered, until medication-free remission was achieved. Transition probabilities for individual treatment steps were estimated using data of Dutch Rheumatology Monitoring registry Remission Induction Cohort I (step-up) and II (initial combination). Expected costs, utility, and ICER after 5 years were compared between the two strategies. To account for parameter uncertainty, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was employed through Gamma, Normal, and Dirichlet distributions. All utilities, costs, and transition probabilities were replaced by fitted distributions. Results Over a 5-year timespan, initial combination therapy was less costly and more effective than step-up therapy. Initial combination therapy accrued €16,226.3 and 3.552 QALY vs €20,183.3 and 3.517 QALYs for step-up therapy. This resulted in a negative ICER, indicating that initial combination therapy was both less costly and more effective in terms of utility gained. This can be explained by higher (±5%) remission percentages in initial combination strategy at all time points. More patients in remission generates less healthcare and productivity loss costs and higher utility. Additionally, higher remission percentages caused less bDMARD use in the initial combination strategy, lowering overall costs. Conclusion Initial combination therapy was found favourable over step-up therapy in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, when considering cost-effectiveness. Initial combination therapy resulted in more utility at a lower cost over 5 years. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-019-0064-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine J van de Laar
- 1Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Transparency in Healthcare b.v., Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- 1Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Transparency in Healthcare b.v., Hengelo, The Netherlands.,3Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- 1Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Transparency in Healthcare b.v., Hengelo, The Netherlands.,3Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,4Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Janssen CA, Oude Voshaar MAH, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MAFJ. Prognostic factors associated with early gout flare recurrence in patients initiating urate-lowering therapy during an acute gout flare. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38:2233-2239. [PMID: 31030363 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04566-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Lowering serum urate levels below the threshold for crystal formation with urate-lowering therapy (ULT) has been associated with a lower risk for gout flare reoccurrences. However, gout patients on ULT still commonly suffer from recurring gout flares. The purpose of this study was to explore prognostic factors associated with gout flare recurrence within the first 3 months, in gout patients starting ULT during an acute gout flare. Post-hoc analysis of trial data on acute gout patients randomized to either gout flare standard of care or anakinra treatment were used, including baseline demographic, laboratory, clinical, and patient-reported variables, as well as 3-month follow-up data on gout flare recurrences. Only patients starting ULT at baseline were included. Using variable selection based on clinical relevance, univariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were done to examine predictors of gout flare reoccurrence. A total of 75 patients were included in this study, of which 36 (48%) experienced a gout flare ≤ 3 months post baseline. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that CRP levels > 30 mg/L (OR 9.47) and lack of prophylaxis when starting ULT (OR 11.56) were independently associated with gout flare recurrence. Similar results were found for the univariate regression analyses. Our results show that CRP levels > 30 mg/L and lack of prophylaxis when starting ULT were prognostic factors for early gout flare reoccurrence in patients starting ULT during an acute gout flare. KEY POINTS: • Gout flare recurrences were common within the first 3 months after starting urate-lowering therapy in gout patients. • Intake of prophylaxis when starting ULT had a strong protective effect on gout flare recurrences. • C-reactive protein level > 30 mg/L was an additional prognostic factor for early (≤ 3 months) gout flare reoccurrence in patients starting ULT during an acute gout flare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Janssen
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - M A H Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - P M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - H E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M A F J van de Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Janssen CA, Oude Voshaar MAH, Ten Klooster PM, Jansen TLTA, Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MAFJ. A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:63. [PMID: 30975212 PMCID: PMC6460780 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1125-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gout is a common, monosodium urate crystal-driven inflammatory arthritis. Besides its clinical manifestations, patients often also suffer from pain, physical impairment, emotional distress and work productivity loss, as a result of the disease. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to assess these consequences of the disease. However, current instrument endorsements for measuring such outcomes in acute and chronic gout clinical settings are based on limited psychometric evidence. The objective of this systematic literature review was to identify currently available PROMs for gout, and to critically evaluate their content and psychometric properties, in order to evaluate the current status regarding PROMs for use in gout patients. Methods Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. The methodological quality of included papers was appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, and evaluation of measurement properties (reliability, responsiveness, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects) was done in accordance with published quality criteria. Item content was appraised by linking health concepts to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Results In total, 13 PROMs were identified, of which three were targeted specifically at gout patients. The majority of the PROMs were rated positively for content validity. For most instruments, limited evidence was available for construct validity and reliability. Instruments to assess pain scored well on responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects, but not much is known about their reliability in gout. Conclusions The physical functioning subscale of the SF-36v2 (Short Form-36 item version 2) is the only PROM that had sufficient supporting evidence for all its psychometric properties. Many of the commonly used PROMs in gout are currently not yet well supported and more studies on their measurement properties are needed among both acute and chronic gout populations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1125-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly A Janssen
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Tim L Th A Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO BOX 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van Bemmel PF, Voshaar MAO, Klooster PMT, Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MA. Development and preliminary evaluation of a short self-report measure of generalized pain hypersensitivity. J Pain Res 2019; 12:395-404. [PMID: 30705605 PMCID: PMC6342225 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s182287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Generalized pain hypersensitivity is frequently observed in chronic pain conditions. Currently, identification is based on expert clinical opinion, and in very few cases combined with quantitative sensory testing. The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate a short self-report measure of generalized pain hypersensitivity: a generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ). Methods Items for the GPQ were developed based on a literature review, followed by an interview study with ten rheumatic patients with suspected pain hypersensitivity. We examined the psychometric properties of the preliminary items in a sample of 212 outpatients suffering from either fibromyalgia (FM; n=98) or rheumatoid arthritis (n=114). Additionally, self-reported data were gathered on sociodemographics, fibromyalgia-survey criteria, health status, and neuropathic-like pain features. Results Mokken-scale analyses demonstrated a unidimensional seven-item scale with strong homogeneity (H=0.65) and high reliability (r=0.90). Correlations between total GPQ scores and relevant external measures, such as the FM-survey criteria and neuropathic-like pain features, were consistent with a priori expectations, supporting its external construct validity. Furthermore, the GPQ had good accuracy in distinguishing between patients with FM (generally assumed to be the result of central nervous system hypersensitization) and patients with RA (assumed to result mostly in local nociceptive or inflammatory pain), with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.89. A cutoff value >10 had the highest combination of sensitivity (82.7%) and specificity (77.2%). Conclusion The GPQ is psychometrically sound and appears promising for measuring the presence and severity of generalized pain hypersensitivity in chronic pain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F van Bemmel
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Martijn Ah Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands,
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands,
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands,
| | - Mart Afj van de Laar
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands,
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ghiti Moghadam M, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, Kneepkens EL, Klaasen R, Stolk JN, Tchetverikov I, Vreugdenhil SA, van Woerkom JM, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, Landewé RBM, van Riel PLCM, van de Laar MAFJ, Jansen TL. Impact of Stopping Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors on Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Burden of Disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 70:516-524. [PMID: 28692770 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of stopping tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of physical and mental health status, health utility, pain, disability, and fatigue in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS In the pragmatic, 12-month POET trial, 817 RA patients with ≥6 months of remission or stable low disease activity were randomized 2:1 to stopping or continuing TNFi. In case of flare, TNFi was restarted at the discretion of the rheumatologist. PROs were assessed every 3 months. RESULTS TNFi was restarted within 12 months in 252 of 531 patients (47.5%) in the stop group. At 3 months, mean PRO scores were significantly worse in the stop group, and a larger proportion of patients experienced a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) on all PROs. Effect sizes (ES) were strongest for health utility (ES -0.24) and pain (ES -0.30). Mean scores improved again after this point, but disability scores remained significantly different at 12 months. After 12 months, the relative risk of experiencing an MCID ranged from 1.16 for mental health status to 1.58 for fatigue. Mean PRO scores for patients restarting TNFi within 6 months were no longer significantly different from those that did not restart TNFi at 12 months. CONCLUSION Stopping TNFi had a significant negative short-term impact on a broad range of PROs. Long-term negative consequences appeared to be limited, and outcomes in patients needing to restart TNFi within the first 6 months tended to be restored at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Ghiti Moghadam
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruth Klaasen
- Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N Stolk
- Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Centre Twente, University of Twente, and Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Janssen CA, Oude Voshaar MAH, Vonkeman HE, Jansen TLTA, Janssen M, Kok MR, Radovits B, van Durme C, Baan H, van de Laar MAFJ. Anakinra for the treatment of acute gout flares: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, non-inferiority trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:5270863. [PMID: 30602035 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra in treating acute gout flares in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator, non-inferiority (NI) trial. METHODS Patients with a crystal-proven acute gout flare were randomized (1: 1) to treatment with anakinra or treatment as usual (free choice: either colchicine, naproxen or prednisone). The primary end point was the change in pain between baseline and the averaged pain score on days 2-4 measured on a five-point rating scale. NI of anakinra would be established if the upper bound of the 95% CI of the numeric difference in changed pain scores between treatment groups did not exceed the NI limit of 0.4 in favour of treatment as usual, in the per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) populations, assessed in an analysis of covariance model. Secondary outcomes included safety assessments, improvement in pain, swelling, tenderness and treatment response after 5 days, assessed using linear mixed models and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS Forty-three patients received anakinra and 45 treatment as usual. Anakinra was non-inferior (mean difference; 95% CI) to treatment as usual in both the PP (-0.13; -0.44, 0.18) and ITT (-0.18; -0.44, 0.08) populations. No unexpected or uncommon (serious) adverse events were observed in either treatment arm. Analyses of secondary outcomes showed that patients in both groups reported similar significant reductions in their gout symptoms. CONCLUSION Efficacy of anakinra was shown to be non-inferior to treatment as usual for the treatment of acute gout flares, suggesting that anakinra is an effective treatment alternative for acute gout flares. TRIAL REGISTRATION Het Nederlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl, NTR5234.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly A Janssen
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Ensche, The Netherlands
| | - Tim L Th A Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Janssen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R Kok
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bea Radovits
- Department of Rheumatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Durme
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hetty Baan
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ZiekenhuisGroep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Ensche, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
van Heuckelum M, Mathijssen EGE, Vervloet M, Boonen A, Hebing RCF, Pasma A, Vonkeman HE, Wenink MH, van den Bemt BJF, van Dijk L. Preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:1199-1211. [PMID: 31413548 PMCID: PMC6660639 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s204111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients have different treatment preferences, these individual preferences could often be grouped in subgroups with shared preferences. Knowledge of these subgroups as well as factors associated with subgroup membership supports health care professionals in the understanding of what matters to patients in clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVES To identify subgroups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on their shared preferences toward disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and to identify factors associated with subgroup membership. METHODS A discrete choice experiment to determine DMARD preferences of adult patients with RA was designed based on a literature review, expert recommendations, and focus groups. In this multicenter study, patients were asked to state their preferred choice between two different hypothetical treatment options, described by seven DMARD characteristics with three levels within each characteristic. Latent class analyses and multinomial logistic regressions were used to identify subgroups and the characteristics (patient characteristics, disease-related variables, and beliefs about medicines) associated with subgroup membership. RESULTS Among 325 participating patients with RA, three subgroups were identified: an administration-driven subgroup (45.6%), a benefit-driven subgroup (29.7%), and a balanced subgroup (24.7%). Patients who were currently using biologic DMARDs were significantly more likely to belong to the balanced subgroup than the administration-driven subgroup (relative risk ratio (RRR): 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89). Highly educated patients were significantly more likely to belong to the benefit-driven subgroup than the balanced subgroup (RRR: 11.4, 95% CI: 0.97-133.6). Patients' medication-related concerns did not contribute significantly to subgroup membership, whereas a near-significant association was found between patients' beliefs about medication necessity and their membership of the benefit-driven subgroup (RRR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23). CONCLUSION Three subgroups with shared preferences were identified. Only biologic DMARD use and educational level were associated with subgroup membership. Integrating patient's medication preferences in pharmacotherapy decisions may improve the quality of decisions and possibly medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milou van Heuckelum
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Milou van HeuckelumDepartments of Rheumatology and Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 9500 GMNijmegen, the NetherlandsTel +31 24 352 8123Email
| | - Elke GE Mathijssen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcia Vervloet
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)
, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Annelieke Pasma
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Mark H Wenink
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bart JF van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)
, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTEE), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|