1
|
Noordam D, Noordman J, van den Braak G, Visee H, Bakker A, Batenburg R, Olde Hartman TC, van Dulmen S. Shared decision-making in undergraduate nursing and medical education: An explorative dual-method study. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 123:108246. [PMID: 38480111 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explores how shared decision-making (SDM) is integrated in undergraduate nursing and medical education. METHODS A dual-method design was applied. The integration of SDM in medicine and nursing education programs (i.e. SDM on paper) was explored through document analyses; the integration of SDM in curricula (i.e. SDM in class) through interviews with teachers and curriculum coordinators (N = 19). RESULTS A majority of the education programs featured SDM, mostly non-explicit. In curricula SDM was generally implicitly featured in compulsory courses across all study years. SDM was often integrated into preexisting theories and models and taught through various methods and materials. Generally, teachers and supervisors were not trained in SDM themselves. They assessed students' competence in SDM in a summative manner. CONCLUSION Overall, SDM was featured in undergraduate nursing and medical education, however, very implicitly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désanne Noordam
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Hetty Visee
- Regioplan Beleidsonderzoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alice Bakker
- V&VN (Verpleegkundigen & Verzorgenden Nederland), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Batenburg
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands; University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Engelen MM, Franken MCJP, Stipdonk LW, Horton SE, Jackson VE, Reilly S, Morgan AT, Fisher SE, van Dulmen S, Eising E. The Association Between Stuttering Burden and Psychosocial Aspects of Life in Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2024; 67:1385-1399. [PMID: 38625147 DOI: 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stuttering is a speech condition that can have a major impact on a person's quality of life. This descriptive study aimed to identify subgroups of people who stutter (PWS) based on stuttering burden and to investigate differences between these subgroups on psychosocial aspects of life. METHOD The study included 618 adult participants who stutter. They completed a detailed survey examining stuttering symptomatology, impact of stuttering on anxiety, education and employment, experience of stuttering, and levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. A two-step cluster analytic procedure was performed to identify subgroups of PWS, based on self-report of stuttering frequency, severity, affect, and anxiety, four measures that together inform about stuttering burden. RESULTS We identified a high- (n = 230) and a low-burden subgroup (n = 372). The high-burden subgroup reported a significantly higher impact of stuttering on education and employment, and higher levels of general depression, anxiety, stress, and overall impact of stuttering. These participants also reported that they trialed more different stuttering therapies than those with lower burden. CONCLUSIONS Our results emphasize the need to be attentive to the diverse experiences and needs of PWS, rather than treating them as a homogeneous group. Our findings also stress the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies for individuals with stuttering, considering all aspects that could influence their stuttering burden. People with high-burden stuttering might, for example, have a higher need for psychological therapy to reduce stuttering-related anxiety. People with less emotional reactions but severe speech distortions may also have a moderate to high burden, but they may have a higher need for speech techniques to communicate with more ease. Future research should give more insights into the therapeutic needs of people highly burdened by their stuttering. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25582980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marscha M Engelen
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Christine J P Franken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lottie W Stipdonk
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah E Horton
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria E Jackson
- Population Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sheena Reilly
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Angela T Morgan
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon E Fisher
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Sweden
| | - Else Eising
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Makoul G, Noble L, Gulbrandsen P, van Dulmen S. Reinforcing the humanity in healthcare: The Glasgow Consensus Statement on effective communication in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 122:108158. [PMID: 38330705 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Contemporary healthcare is characterized by multidisciplinary teamwork across a vast array of primary, secondary and tertiary services, augmented by progressively more technology and data. While these developments aim to improve care, they have also created obstacles and new challenges for both patients and health professionals. Indeed, the increasingly fragmented and transactional nature of clinical encounters can dehumanize the care experience across disciplines and specialties. Effective communication plays a pivotal role in reinforcing the humanity of healthcare through the delivery of person-centered care - compassionate, collaborative care that focuses on the needs of each patient as a whole person. After convening at the International Conference on Communication in Healthcare (Glasgow, 2022), an interdisciplinary group of researchers, educators and health professionals worked together to develop a framework for effective communication that both acknowledges critical challenges in contemporary health services and reinforces the humanity of healthcare. The Glasgow Consensus Statement is intended to function as a useful international touchstone for the training and practice of health professionals, fully recognizing and respecting that different countries are at different stages when it comes to teaching, assessment and policy. It also provides a vocabulary for monitoring the impact of system-level challenges. While effective communication may not change the structure of healthcare, it can improve the process if health professionals are supported in infusing the system with their own innate humanity and applying the framework offered within this consensus statement to reinforce the humanity in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Makoul
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA; Human Understanding Institute, NRC Health, Lincoln, USA.
| | - Lorraine Noble
- UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK; EACH: International Association for Communication in Healthcare, Salisbury, UK
| | - Pål Gulbrandsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McGhie-Fraser B, McLoughlin C, Lucassen P, Ballering A, van Dulmen S, Brouwers E, Stone J, Olde Hartman T. Measuring persistent somatic symptom related stigmatisation: Development of the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma scale for Healthcare Professionals (PSSS-HCP). J Psychosom Res 2024:111689. [PMID: 38704347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) describe recurrent or continuously occurring symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, or pain that have persisted for at least several months. These include single symptoms such as chronic pain, combinations of symptoms, or functional disorders such as fibromyalgia or irritable bowel syndrome. While stigmatisation by healthcare professionals is regularly reported, there are limited measurement instruments demonstrating content validity. This study develops a new instrument to measure stigmatisation by healthcare professionals, the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma scale for Healthcare Professionals (PSSS-HCP). METHODS Development was an iterative process consisting of research team review, item generation and cognitive interviewing. We generated a longlist of 60 items from previous reviews and qualitative research. We conducted 18 cognitive interviews with healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom (UK). We analysed the relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of items, including the potential for social desirability bias. RESULTS After research team consensus and initial feedback, we retained 40 items for cognitive interviewing. After our first round of interviews (n = 11), we removed 20 items, added three items and amended five items. After our second round of interviews (n = 7), we removed four items and amended three items. No major problems with relevance, comprehensibility, comprehensiveness or social desirability were found in remaining items. CONCLUSIONS The provisional version of the PSSS-HCP contains 19 items across three domains (stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination), demonstrating sufficient content validity. Our next step will be to perform a validation study to finalise item selection and explore the structure of the PSSS-HCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brodie McGhie-Fraser
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Caoimhe McLoughlin
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter Lucassen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Aranka Ballering
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Sweden.
| | - Evelien Brouwers
- Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Oorschot F, Brouwers M, Muris J, Veen M, Timmerman A, Dulmen SV. How does guided group reflection work to support professional identity formation in postgraduate medical education: A scoping review. Med Teach 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38626746 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2339409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In postgraduate medical education, guided group reflection is often applied to support professional identity formation. However, little is known about how guided group reflection is shaped and how it works. Our scoping review synthesizes existing evidence about various approaches for guided group reflection, their aims, components and potential working mechanisms. METHODS We conducted a scoping review using JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) guidelines for conducting scoping reviews. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and ERIC databases for all research articles published in English or Dutch in an iterative team approach. The articles were extracted and summarized quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS We included 71 papers (45 primary research papers and 26 non-empirical papers including program descriptions, theoretical concepts and personal experiences). We identified a diversity of approaches for guided group reflection (e.g. Balint groups, supervised collaborative reflection and exchange of experiences), applied in a variety of didactic formats and aims. We distilled potential working mechanisms relating to engagement in reflection, group learning and the supervisor's role. CONCLUSIONS There are significant knowledge gaps about the aims and underlying mechanisms of guided group reflection. Future systematic research on these topics is needed to understand the effectiveness of educational methods, that can help facilitate learning conditions to best shape professional identity formation (PIF) in educational curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederieke van Oorschot
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Brouwers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Muris
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Veen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique Timmerman
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scheffer M, Menting J, Boeije H, van Nispen R, van Dulmen S. Understanding healthcare communication in age-related macular degeneration care: A mixed-methods review of patients' perspectives. Surv Ophthalmol 2024:S0039-6257(24)00018-3. [PMID: 38499047 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible visual impairment among people aged 50 years and older. Earlier research has indicated that the communication process between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) leaves considerable room for improvement in AMD care. Effective communication is essential to enhance trust in the professional and understanding of the diagnosis and treatment, and decrease anxiety and stress related to illness. We review patients' experiences, needs and preferences regarding information provision, communication style of the HCP and shared decision-making. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Study quality was assessed using standard checklists of quality measures. Our search returned 31 eligible articles. Findings indicated current deficits in information provision for people with AMD. Patients were often ill-informed regarding the chronic character of the condition, treatment duration, nutrition, and visual aids and low vision rehabilitation. Many patients were not actively involved during the decision-making process. Altogether, patients with AMD are faced with challenges in terms of patient-HCP communication. Methods of providing information and discussing possible options for care need to be further investigated and improved for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariska Scheffer
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Juliane Menting
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hennie Boeije
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ruth van Nispen
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sundler AJ, Hedén L, Holmström IK, van Dulmen S, Bergman K, Östensson S, Östman M. The patient's first point of contact (PINPOINT) - protocol of a prospective multicenter study of communication and decision-making during patient assessments by primary care registered nurses. BMC Prim Care 2023; 24:249. [PMID: 38031004 PMCID: PMC10685613 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02208-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A major challenge for primary care is to set priorities and balance demands with available resources. The registered nurses in this study are practice nurses working in primary care offices, playing a large role in initial assessments. The overall objective of this research is to investigate practices of communication and decision-making during nurses' initial assessment of patients' health problems in primary care, examine working mechanisms in good practices and develop feasible solutions. METHODS Project PINPOINT aims for a prospective multicenter study using various methods for data collection and analysis. A purposive sample of 150 patient‒nurse consultations, including 30 nurses and 150 patients, will be recruited at primary care centers in three different geographic areas of southwest Sweden. The study will report on outcomes of communication practices in relation to patient-reported expectations and experiences, communication processes and patient involvement, assessment and decision-making, related priorities and value conflicts with data from patient questionnaires, audio-recorded real-time communication, and reflective interviews with nurses. DISCUSSION This research will contribute to the knowledge needed for the guidance of first-line decision-making processes to best meet patient and public health needs. This knowledge is necessary for the development of assessments and decisions to be better aligned to patients and to set priorities. Insights from this research can empower patients and service providers and help understand and enhance feasible person-centered communication strategies tailored to patients' level of health literacy. More specifically, this research will contribute to knowledge that can strengthen nurses' communication, assessments, and clinical decision-making in primary care. In the long term, this will contribute to how the competencies of practice nurses and other professionals are organized and carried out to make the best use of the resources within primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06067672.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelie J Sundler
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, SE-501 90, Sweden.
| | - Lena Hedén
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, SE-501 90, Sweden
| | - Inger K Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, SE-501 90, Sweden
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Bergman
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, SE-501 90, Sweden
| | - Sofia Östensson
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, SE-501 90, Sweden
| | - Malin Östman
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Närhälsan Källstorp Healthcare Centre, Trollhättan, Sweden
- Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Research, Sweden
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Dulmen S, Smits L. [Palliative care benefits from careful use of words]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2023; 167:D7748. [PMID: 37930175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, meaning and valence of words are being examined and weighed. This also occurs in healthcare, where campaigns demand attention for the fact that being terminally ill does not mean that there are no treatments left. Such efforts are commendable as there is room for improvement in the communication between healthcare providers and patients and healthcare providers are not equally well equipped to communicate effectively. Still, a US study in palliative surgery suggests that patients do not prefer one particular communication framework over another, tailoring of words seems the way to go. This may be especially beneficial for patients with a limited level of health literacy. Communication tools like the 'teach back' method, e-learnings and language guides can furthermore support healthcare providers in palliative care to continue to choose their words carefully with patients with a limited life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel, Utrecht (tevens: Radboudumc, afd. Eerstelijnsgeneeskunde, Nijmegen en University of Borås, Zweden): prof.dr. S. van Dulmen, psycholoog
- Contact: Sandra van Dulmen
| | - Lies Smits
- Vincent van Gogh voor geestelijke gezondheidszorg, Venray: drs. L. Smits, klinisch geriater
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mentink M, Verbeek D, Noordman J, Timmer-Bonte A, von Rosenstiel I, van Dulmen S. The Effects of Complementary Therapies on Patient-Reported Outcomes: An Overview of Recent Systematic Reviews in Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4513. [PMID: 37760483 PMCID: PMC10526744 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Many patients with cancer make use of complementary medicine alongside conventional medicine, but clinicians in oncology often lack the knowledge to adequately advise patients on the evidence base for complementary therapies. This study aims to provide an overview of recently published systematic reviews that assess the effects of complementary therapies on patient-reported health outcomes in patients with cancer. Systematic reviews, including a meta-analysis of at least two randomized controlled trials, were identified from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. The methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2. One hundred systematic reviews were included. The results suggest that several complementary therapies can improve health outcomes reported by patients with cancer, such as acupuncture to relieve pain, music interventions to reduce anxiety and yoga to improve cancer-related fatigue. The side effects related to complementary therapy use are generally mild. The results remain inconclusive for some intervention-outcome combinations. Many of the included systematic reviews insufficiently assessed the causes and impact of bias in their interpretation of the results. This overview of systematic reviews can support clinicians in counselling their patients on this topic and provide directions for future research and clinical practice guidelines in the field of complementary medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Mentink
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.N.); (S.v.D.)
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Verbeek
- Praktijk Integratieve Oncologie, Heesterpoort 18, 9713 KZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.N.); (S.v.D.)
| | - Anja Timmer-Bonte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Ines von Rosenstiel
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands;
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.N.); (S.v.D.)
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, University of Borås, Work Life and Social Welfare, Allégatan 1, 501 90 Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Dulmen S, Eide H, Finset A. Implementing lifestyle interventions in clinical practice: The importance of adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 109:107651. [PMID: 36753828 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
| | - Hilde Eide
- Centre for Health and Technology Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Arnstein Finset
- Patient Education and Counseling and Department of Behavioural Medicine University of Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Vliet LM, Leeuwenburgh MLR, Westendorp J, van Dulmen S, de Jong PC, Stouthard JML. Good versus bad news consultations in advanced breast cancer: the role of empathy in information recall - an observational study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2022-003938. [PMID: 36972984 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We explored, in advanced breast cancer, whether: (1) patients recall less information following bad versus good news consultations; (2) empathy has a greater effect on recalled information following bad versus good news consultations. METHODS Observational study using audio-recorded consultations. Participants' recall of provided information about treatment options, aims/positive effects and side-effects was assessed. Clinician-expressed empathy and consultation type were determined. Regression analyses assessed associations between consultation type and recall, exploring moderating influences of clinician-expressed empathy. RESULTS For 41 consultations (18 bad news, 23 good news), recall data were completed; total recall (47% vs 73%, p=0.03) and recall about treatment options (67% vs 85%, p=0.08, trend) were significantly worse following bad news compared with good news consultations. Recall about treatment aims/positive effects (53% vs 70%, p=0.30) and side-effects (28% vs 49%, p=0.20) was not significantly worse following bad news. Empathy moderated the relationship between consultation type and total recall (p<0.01), recall about treatment options (p=0.03) and about aims/positive effects (p<0.01) but not about side-effects (p=0.10). Only following good news consultations empathy influenced recall favourably. CONCLUSIONS This explorative study suggests that in advanced cancer, information recall is especially impaired following bad news consultations, for which empathy does not improve remembered information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Margot L R Leeuwenburgh
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Janine Westendorp
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Communication, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Institute for Healh Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline M L Stouthard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGhie-Fraser B, Lucassen P, Ballering A, Abma I, Brouwers E, van Dulmen S, Olde Hartman T. Persistent somatic symptom related stigmatisation by healthcare professionals: A systematic review of questionnaire measurement instruments. J Psychosom Res 2023; 166:111161. [PMID: 36753936 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) experience stigmatising attitudes and behaviours by healthcare professionals. While previous research has focussed on individual manifestations of PSS related stigma, less is known about sound ways to measure stigmatisation by healthcare professionals towards patients with PSS. This review aims to assess the quality of questionnaire measurement instruments and make recommendations about their use. METHODS A systematic review using six databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey and EThOS). The search strategy combined three search strings related to healthcare professionals, PSS and stigma. Additional publications were identified by searching bibliographies. Three authors independently extracted the data. Data analysis and synthesis followed COSMIN methodology for reviews of outcome measurement instruments. RESULTS We identified 90 publications that met the inclusion criteria using 62 questionnaire measurement instruments. Stereotypes were explored in 92% of instruments, prejudices in 52% of instruments, and discrimination in 19% of instruments. The development process of the instruments was not rated higher than doubtful. Construct validity, structural validity, internal consistency and reliability were the most commonly investigated measurement properties. Evidence around content validity was inconsistent or indeterminate. CONCLUSION No instrument provided acceptable evidence on all measurement properties. Many instruments were developed for use within a single publication, with little evidence of their development or establishment of content validity. This is problematic because stigma instruments should reflect the challenges that healthcare professionals face when working with patients with PSS. They should also reflect the experiences that patients with PSS have widely reported during clinical encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brodie McGhie-Fraser
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Peter Lucassen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Aranka Ballering
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Inger Abma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Evelien Brouwers
- Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Sweden.
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heyn LG, Løkkeberg ST, Ellington L, van Dulmen S, Eide H. Understanding the role of positive emotions in healthcare communication - A realist review. Nurs Open 2023; 10:3447-3459. [PMID: 36611271 PMCID: PMC10170929 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore how the expression of positive emotions during the interaction between patients and providers can cultivate the patient-provider relationship. DESIGN We conducted a realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards. METHODS We systematically searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Scopus from inception to March 2019. Study selection and data extraction were performed blinded in pairs. From 3146 abstracts blinded in pairs, 15 papers were included and analysed. From each included paper, we extracted contexts, mechanisms and outcomes that were relevant to answer our research questions, creating a configuration between these elements (CMO configuration). RESULTS Our findings suggest that in the contexts of person orientation and positive outlook, patient-provider relationships improve by communication conveying and eliciting positive emotions. We found six underlying mechanisms for this that form either direct or indirect pathways between the context and the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Günterberg Heyn
- Center for Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Stine Torp Løkkeberg
- Faculty of Health and Welfare Studies, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway
| | - Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medicalcenter, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Hilde Eide
- Center for Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schouten AEM, Mentink MDC, Timmer-Bonte JANH, Noordman J, van Dulmen S. Perspectives and Attitudes of Dutch Healthcare Professionals Regarding the Integration of Complementary Medicine in Oncology. Integr Cancer Ther 2023; 22:15347354231164650. [PMID: 37026667 PMCID: PMC10087649 DOI: 10.1177/15347354231164650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Almost half of all patients with cancer use complementary medicine (CM) alongside conventional cancer treatment. Further integration of CM into clinical practice could enhance communication and ensure improved coordination between complementary medicine and conventional care. This study assessed the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the current status of integration of CM in oncology, as well as their attitudes and beliefs toward CM. METHODS A convenience, volunteer sample of healthcare providers and healthcare managers working in oncology in the Netherlands were surveyed, using a self-reporting, anonymous, online questionnaire. The perspectives on the current status of integration and barriers to implementing complementary medicine were characterized in part 1, while part 2 assessed respondents' attitudes and beliefs regarding CM. RESULTS A total of 209 people completed part 1 of the survey and 159 people completed the entire questionnaire. Two-thirds (68.4%) of the respondents indicated that their organization has implemented complementary medicine in oncology, or envisions implementation, while 49.3% stated they were missing something to implement CM in oncology. About 86.8% of the respondents (completely) agreed that complementary medicine is an important supplement to oncological treatment. Female respondents were more likely to express positive attitudes, as well as respondents whose institutions have implemented CM. CONCLUSION The findings of this study indicate that attention is being paid to the integration of CM into oncology. Overall, the attitudes of respondents toward CM were positive. The main barriers for implementing CM activities were missing knowledge, experience, financial support, and support from management. To improve the ability of healthcare providers to guide patients in their use of complementary medicine, these issues should be delved into in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek E M Schouten
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marit D C Mentink
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Smissen D, Rietjens JAC, van Dulmen S, Drenthen T, Vrijaldenhoven-Haitsma FRMD, Wulp M, van der Heide A, Korfage IJ. The Web-Based Advance Care Planning Program "Explore Your Preferences for Treatment and Care": Development, Pilot Study, and Before-and-After Evaluation. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e38561. [PMID: 36459410 DOI: 10.2196/38561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Web-based advance care planning (ACP) programs may support patients in thinking about and discussing their preferences for future treatment and care. However, they are not widely available, and only a limited number of programs are evidence based. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and evaluate an evidence-based, interactive web-based ACP program that guides users through the process of thinking about, discussing, and recording of preferences for treatment and care. METHODS The program "Explore your preferences for treatment and care" was developed, pilot-tested on feasibility, and subsequently evaluated; engagement in ACP was assessed before program completion and 2 months after program completion using the ACP Engagement Survey (score 1-5) among 147 persons with chronic disease. Usability (score 0-100) and user satisfaction (score 1-5) were also assessed. RESULTS ACP engagement increased from 2.8 before program completion to 3.0 two months after program completion (P<.001); contemplation about ACP increased from 2.6 to 2.8 (P=.003), and readiness for ACP increased from 2.2 to 2.5 (P<.001). No changes were found for knowledge about ACP (3.0-3.2; P=.07) and self-efficacy for ACP (3.8-3.8; P=.25). The program was perceived as usable (mean 70, SD 13), attractive (mean 3.8, SD 0.7), and comprehensible (mean 4.2, SD 0.6). CONCLUSIONS We developed an evidence-based, interactive web-based ACP program in cocreation with patients, relatives, and health care professionals. Before-and-after evaluation showed that the program can support people in taking first steps in ACP and in reflecting on preferences for treatment and care, by guiding them through the process of ACP using a stepwise approach. Participants perceived the program as usable and understandable, and they were satisfied with the program and with the amount of information. Health care professionals may use the program as a tool to start ACP discussions with their patients. The program may increase awareness of ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris van der Smissen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith A C Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Ton Drenthen
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ida J Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pouls BPH, Bekker CL, Gundogan F, Hebing RCF, van Onzenoort HAW, van de Ven LI, Vonkeman HE, Tieben R, Vriezekolk JE, van Dulmen S, Van den Bemt B. Gaming for Adherence to Medication using Ehealth in Rheumatoid arthritis (GAMER) study: a randomised controlled trial. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002616. [PMID: 36410776 PMCID: PMC9680317 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine the effect on adherence to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of a serious game that targeted implicit attitudes toward medication. Methods A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed with adults with RA that used DMARDs and possessed a smartphone/tablet. Control and intervention groups received care as usual. The intervention group played the serious game at will during 3 months. Game play data and online questionnaires Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR), Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) were collected. Primary outcome was DMARD implementation adherence operationalised as the difference in proportion of non-adherent participants (<80% taking adherence) between intervention and control group after 3 months using a Chi-squared test. Two sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were performed to test for differences on secondary outcomes. Results Of the 110 intervention participants that started the study, 87 participants (79%) installed the game and had a median playtime of 9.7 hours at 3 months. Overall, 186 participants completed the study. Adherence in intervention group (63%) and control group (54%) did not differ significantly (p=0.13) at 3 months. Neither were there differences oberved in CQR continuous score, beliefs about medication (BMQ) or clinical outcomes (HAQ and RADAI). Conclusion A serious game aimed at reinterpreting attitudes toward medication failed to show an effect on adherence to DMARDs or clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The game was played frequently indicating that it can be an effective channel for reaching patients. Trial registration number NL7217.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart P H Pouls
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Fatma Gundogan
- Pharmacy, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Renske CF Hebing
- Pharmacy, Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Centre Reade, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Hein AW van Onzenoort
- Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Tieben
- Research, Development and Innovation, Game Solutions Lab, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Healthcare Communication, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Department of Primary and Community Care Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Bart Van den Bemt
- Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stommel W, Plug I, Olde Hartman TC, Lucassen PLBJ, van Dulmen S, Das E. Gender stereotyping in medical interaction: A Membership Categorization Analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3242-3248. [PMID: 35985905 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gender can be a valuable resource in communication but also a problem, perpetuating gender stereotypes. So far, there has been little attention for how healthcare professionals and patients make gender relevant in medical interactions. The approach of Membership Categorization Analysis (MCA) is particularly pertinent to meticulously analyze gender in medical communication. Applying MCA, this study analyzes how activity descriptions implicitly associated with gender stereotypes, e.g., "carrying a laundry basket up the stairs", feature in the course of GPs' explanations of a question or diagnosis. The aim is to provide a new perspective on the relationship between gender and medical interaction, and to increase our understanding of how gender stereotypes are reproduced in the medical setting. METHOD Two cases of GPs using gendered explanations in Dutch general practice interactions are analyzed turn-by-turn using MCA. RESULTS The findings show how GPs' descriptions of gendered activities serve the exemplification of technical terms, designed for the specific patient, while also casting the patient in a traditional gender role. CONCLUSION Invoking gender in medical interaction may serve a communicative goal while also perpetuating stereotypes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Insight in the subtleties of gender construction in medical interactions could enhance gender awareness and sensitivity in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wyke Stommel
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ilona Plug
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Peter L B J Lucassen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mentink MDC, van Vliet LM, Timmer-Bonte JANH, Noordman J, van Dulmen S. How is complementary medicine discussed in oncology? Observing real-life communication between clinicians and patients with advanced cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3235-3241. [PMID: 35989202 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine the structure of communication about complementary medicine (CM) between patients with cancer and clinicians during oncology consultations. METHODS Previously, consultations between 29 clinicians and 80 patients with advanced cancer were recorded in six hospitals in the Netherlands. The present study considers a secondary analysis. References to CM during the consultation were coded using a self-developed observational coding scheme. RESULTS At least one reference to CM was observed in 35 out of 80 consultations (44 %), with a total of 73 references. In most cases, CM was initially referred to by patients. Clinicians often did not elaborate on the subject of CM. Relevant aspects related to CM (e.g., safety, effectiveness) were infrequently discussed. Both patients and clinicians showed predominantly neutral to positive attitudes towards CM. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that patients are still the main initiators of discussions about CM and the topic is not consistently discussed in daily oncology practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS If exploration of patients' interest in CM or its use became routine in oncology practice, it may relieve patients of the burden of introducing the topic, decrease potential risks of CM use and increase access to evidence-based CM for all patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit D C Mentink
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Communication in Healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Leiden University, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden, Netherlands; Leiden University, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Communication in Healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Communication in Healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Plug I, van Dulmen S, Stommel W, Olde Hartman TC, Das E. Physicians' and Patients' Interruptions in Clinical Practice: A Quantitative Analysis. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:423-429. [PMID: 36228066 PMCID: PMC9512556 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Physicians' interruptions have long been considered intrusive, masculine actions that inhibit patient participation, but a systematic analysis of interruptions in clinical interaction is lacking. This study aimed to examine when and how primary care physicians and patients interrupt each other during consultations. METHODS We coded and quantitatively analyzed interruption type (cooperative vs intrusive) in 84 natural interactions between 17 primary care physicians and 84 patients with common somatic symptoms. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects logistic regression model, with role, gender, and consultation phase as predictors. RESULTS Of the 2,405 interruptions observed, 82.9% were cooperative. Among physicians, men were more likely to make an intrusive interruption than women (β = 0.43; SE, 0.21; odds ratio [OR] = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.31), whereas among patients, men were less likely to make an intrusive interruption than women (β = -0.35; SE, 0.17; OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98). Patients' interruptions were more likely to be intrusive than physicians' interruptions in the phase of problem presentation (β = 0.71; SE, 0.23; OR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.30-3.20), but not in the phase of diagnosis and/or treatment plan discussion (β = -0.17; SE, 0.15; OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.15). CONCLUSIONS Most interruptions in clinical interaction are cooperative and may enhance the interaction. The nature of physicians' and patients' interruptions is the result of an interplay between role, gender, and consultation phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Plug
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Wyke Stommel
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Noordman J, Roodbeen R, Gach L, Schulze L, Rademakers J, van den Muijsenbergh M, Boland G, van Dulmen S. 'A basic understanding'; evaluation of a blended training programme for healthcare providers in hospital-based palliative care to improve communication with patients with limited health literacy. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22:613. [PMID: 35953800 PMCID: PMC9371628 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03685-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The non-curative setting makes communication and shared decision-making in palliative care extremely demanding. This is even more so for patients with limited health literacy. So far, research in palliative care focusing on shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy is lacking. Recent research from our team indicates that the assessment of these patients' understanding of their situation and the implementation of shared decision-making in palliative care, needs improvement. METHODS To improve communication and decision-making, especially with patients with limited health literacy, we developed and evaluated a blended training programme for healthcare providers. The training programme comprised of an e-learning and a team training. The evaluation was performed by 1. conducting interviews (n = 15) focused on evaluating the whole programme and, 2. coding video-recorded outpatient consultations on the extent to which providers involved patients in decision-making before (n = 19) and after (n = 20) the intervention, using the 5-item OPTION coding instrument. RESULTS The interviews showed that healthcare providers valued the skills they had learned during the e-learning and team training. Providers specifically valued the teach-back technique, learned to use simpler wording and felt better able to recognize patients with limited health literacy. Many providers reported a change in communication behaviour as a consequence of the training programme. Suggestions for improvement for both e-learning and training were, amongst others, a follow-up team training course and a new scenarios for the e-learning about discussing palliative care. For both the pre- and the post-measurement, involving patients in decision-making lies between a minimal and a moderate effort; differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS The e-learning and team training were valued positively by the healthcare providers. Adaptations to the e-learning have been made after evaluation. The e-learning has been implemented in several hospitals and medical education. To improve shared decision-making in practice a more sustained effort is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Research Department, Breuer & Intraval, Research and Consultancy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Gach
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte Schulze
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jany Rademakers
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Dulmen S, Roodbeen R, Schulze L, Prantl K, Rookmaaker M, van Jaarsveld B, Noordman J, Abrahams A. Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:258. [PMID: 35864466 PMCID: PMC9306155 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02887-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Given the complexity and variety in treatment options for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), shared decision-making (SDM) can be a challenge. SDM is needed for making decisions that best suit patients’ needs and their medical and living situations. SDM might be experienced differently by different stakeholders. This study aimed to explore clinical practice and perspectives on SDM in nephrology from three angles: observers, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. First, in the quantitative part of the study, outpatient consultations with patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 20 ml/min) were video recorded and SDM was assessed using the OPTION5 instrument. Subsequently, in the qualitative part, patients and HCPs reflected on their own SDM behaviour during individual stimulated recall interviews which were analysed using deductive thematic content analysis. Results Twenty nine consultations were recorded and observed in seven hospitals. The mean SDM score was 51 (range 25–80), indicating that SDM was applied to a moderate extent. The stimulated recall interviews with patients showed that they rely on the information provision and opinion of HCPs, expect consistency and support, and desire a proactive role. They also expect to be questioned by the HCP about their SDM preferences. HCPs said they were willing to incorporate patients’ preferences in SDM, as long as there are no medical contraindications. They also prefer patients to take a prominent role in SDM. HCPs ascribe various roles to themselves in supporting patients’ decision-making. Conclusions Although SDM was applied by HCPs to a moderate extent, improvement is needed, especially in helping patients get the information they need and in making sure that every patient is involved in SDM. This is even more important given the complex nature of the disease and the relatively high prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with chronic kidney disease. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02887-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500, Utrecht, BN, Netherlands. .,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands. .,Faculty of Caring Science, Working Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Breuer&Intraval, Research and Consultancy, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Schulze
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500, Utrecht, BN, Netherlands
| | - Karen Prantl
- Dutch Kidney Patients Association, Bussum, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Rookmaaker
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Brigit van Jaarsveld
- Department of NephrologyAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam location, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Diapriva Dialysis Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500, Utrecht, BN, Netherlands
| | - Alferso Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stortenbeker I, Salm L, Olde Hartman T, Stommel W, Das E, van Dulmen S. Coding linguistic elements in clinical interactions: a step-by-step guide for analyzing communication form. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:191. [PMID: 35820827 PMCID: PMC9277943 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01647-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The quality of communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients affects health outcomes. Different coding systems have been developed to unravel the interaction. Most schemes consist of predefined categories that quantify the content of communication (the what). Though the form (the how) of the interaction is equally important, protocols that systematically code variations in form are lacking. Patterns of form and how they may differ between groups therefore remain unnoticed. To fill this gap, we present CLECI, Coding Linguistic Elements in Clinical Interactions, a protocol for the development of a quantitative codebook analyzing communication form in medical interactions. Methods Analyzing with a CLECI codebook is a four-step process, i.e. preparation, codebook development, (double-)coding, and analysis and report. Core activities within these phases are research question formulation, data collection, selection of utterances, iterative deductive and inductive category refinement, reliability testing, coding, analysis, and reporting. Results and conclusion We present step-by-step instructions for a CLECI analysis and illustrate this process in a case study. We highlight theoretical and practical issues as well as the iterative codebook development which combines theory-based and data-driven coding. Theory-based codes assess how relevant linguistic elements occur in natural interactions, whereas codes derived from the data accommodate linguistic elements to real-life interactions and contribute to theory-building. This combined approach increases research validity, enhances theory, and adjusts to fit naturally occurring data. CLECI will facilitate the study of communication form in clinical interactions and other institutional settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01647-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Stortenbeker
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Lisa Salm
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wyke Stommel
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Caring Science, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scheffer M, Menting J, Roodbeen R, van Dulmen S, van Hecke M, Schlingemann R, van Nispen R, Boeije H. Patients' and health professionals' views on shared decision‐making in age‐related macular degeneration care: A qualitative study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2022; 42:1015-1022. [DOI: 10.1111/opo.13016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mariska Scheffer
- Department of Care and Participation of People with Chronic Conditions Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Juliane Menting
- Department of Care and Participation of People with Chronic Conditions Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Department of Research Breuer&Intraval Research and Consultancy Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Communication in Healthcare Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care Radboud University Medical Center Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen The Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science University of Borås Borås Sweden
| | - Manon van Hecke
- Department of Ophthalmology Elisabeth‐TweeSteden Ziekenhuis Tilburg The Netherlands
| | - Reinier Schlingemann
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Bergman Clinics Ogen Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne Jules‐Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Ruth van Nispen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Hennie Boeije
- Department of Care and Participation of People with Chronic Conditions Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alders I, Smits C, Brand P, van Dulmen S. Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269677. [PMID: 35679303 PMCID: PMC9182226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Effective communication in specialist consultations is difficult for some patients. These patients could benefit from support from a coach who accompanies them to and during medical specialist consultations to improve communication in the consultation room. This study aims to investigate patients’ perspective on interest in support from a patient coach, what kind of support they would like to receive and what characterizes an ideal patient coach. Methods We applied a mixed method design to obtain a realistic understanding of patients’ perspectives on a patient coach. Patients in the waiting rooms of outpatient clinics were asked to fill out a short questionnaire which included questions about demographic characteristics, perceived efficacy in patient-provider interaction and patients’ interest in support from a patient coach. Subsequently, patients interested in a patient coach were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. The quantitative data were examined using univariate analysis and the qualitative interview data were analysed using content analysis. Results The survey was completed by 154 patients and eight of them were interviewed. Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions was the only variable that showed a significant difference between patients with and without an interest in support from a patient coach. The interviews revealed that a bad communication experience was the main reason for having an interest in support from a patient coach. Before the consultation, a patient coach should take the time to get to know the patient, build trust, and help the patient create an agenda, so take the patient seriously and recognize the patient as a whole person. During the consultation, a patient coach should support the patient by intervening and mediating when necessary to elicit the patient’s agenda. After the consultation, a patient coach should be able to explain and discuss medical information and treatment consequences. An ideal patient coach should have medical knowledge, a strong personality and good communication skills. Conclusion Especially patients who had a bad communication experience in a specialist consultation would like support from a patient coach. The kind of support they valued most was intervening and mediating during the consultation. To build the necessary trust, patient coaches should take time to get to know the patient and take the patient seriously. Medical knowledge, good communication skills and a strong personality were considered prerequisites for patient coaches to be capable to intervene in specialist consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irène Alders
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Carolien Smits
- Program Older Adults and Health, Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paul Brand
- Department of Innovation and Research, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geurts EMA, Pittens CACM, Boland G, van Dulmen S, Noordman J. Persuasive communication in medical decision-making during consultations with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:1130-1137. [PMID: 34456095 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Both patients in the palliative phase of their disease and patients with limited health literacy (LHL) have an increased risk of being influenced by healthcare providers (HCPs) when making decisions. This study aims to explore to what extent persuasive communication occurs during shared decision-making (SDM) by (1) providing an overview of persuasive communication behaviours relevant for medical decision-making and (2) exemplifying these using real-life outpatient consultations. METHODS An exploratory qualitative design was applied: (1) brief literature review; (2) analysis of verbatim extracts from outpatient consultations and stimulated recall sessions with HCPs; and (3) stakeholder meetings. RESULTS 24 different persuasive communication behaviours were identified, which can be divided in seven categories: biased presentation of information, authoritative framing, probability framing, illusion of decisional control, normative framing, making assumptions and using emotions or feelings. CONCLUSIONS Persuasive communication is multi-faceted in outpatient consultations. Although undesirable, it may prove useful in specific situations making it necessary to study the phenomenon more in depth and deepen our understanding of its mechanisms and impact. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Awareness among HCPs about the use of persuasive communication needs to be created through training and education. Also, HCPs need help in providing balanced information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther M A Geurts
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Houwen J, de Bont OA, Lucassen PL, Rosmalen JGM, Stappers HW, Olde Hartman TC, van Dulmen S. Development of a blended communication training program for managing medically unexplained symptoms in primary care using the intervention mapping approach. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:1305-1316. [PMID: 34561144 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practice (GP) training in how to communicate with patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) is limited. OBJECTIVE Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based communication training program for GP residents focused on patients with MUS in primary care. METHODS We used the intervention mapping (IM) framework to systematically develop the MUS training program. We conducted a needs assessment to formulate change objectives and identified teaching methods for a MUS communication training program. Next, we developed, implemented and evaluated the training program with 46 residents by assessing their self-efficacy and by exploring their experiences with the training. RESULTS The resulting program is a blended training with an online course and two training days. After attending the training program, GP residents reported significantly higher self-efficacy for communication with patients with MUS at four weeks follow up compared to baseline. Furthermore, GP residents experienced the training program as useful and valued the combination of the online course and training days. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We developed an evidence-based communication training program for the management of patients with MUS in primary care. Future research should examine the effect of the training on GP residents' communication skills in MUS consultations in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juul Houwen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Olga A de Bont
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Lbj Lucassen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith G M Rosmalen
- University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo W Stappers
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stortenbeker I, Stommel W, Olde Hartman T, van Dulmen S, Das E. How General Practitioners Raise Psychosocial Concerns as a Potential Cause of Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Conversation Analysis. Health Commun 2022; 37:696-707. [PMID: 33441007 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1864888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
A common explanation for medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) relates patients' psychosocial concerns to their physical ailments. The present study used conversation analysis to examine how general practitioners (GPs) ascribe psychosocial causes to patients' unexplained symptoms during medical consultations. Our data consisted of 36 recorded consultations from Dutch general practice. We found that GPs raise psychosocial concerns as a potential cause of MUS in 14 consultations, either captured in 1) history-taking questions, or 2) diagnostic explanations. Whereas questions invited patient ideas, explanations did not make relevant patient responses in adjacent turns and subordinated patients' knowledge in symptom experiences to the GP's medical expertise. By questioning patients whether their symptoms may have psychosocial causes GPs enabled symptom explanations to be constructed collaboratively. Furthermore, additional data exploration showed that GPs lay ground for psychosocial ascriptions by first introducing psychosocial concerns as a consequence rather than a cause of complaints. Such preliminary activities allowed GPs to initiate rather delicate psychosocial ascriptions later in the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pouls BP, Bekker CL, van Dulmen S, Vriezekolk JE, van den Bemt BJ. A Serious Puzzle Game to Enhance Adherence to Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Development Using Intervention Mapping. JMIR Serious Games 2022; 10:e31570. [PMID: 35179510 PMCID: PMC8900908 DOI: 10.2196/31570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients’ implicit attitudes toward medication need and concerns may influence their adherence. Targeting these implicit attitudes by combining game-entertainment with medication-related triggers might improve medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective The aim of this study was to describe the systematic development of a serious game to enhance adherence to antirheumatic drugs by using intervention mapping. Methods A serious game was developed using the intervention mapping framework guided by a multidisciplinary expert group, which proceeded along 6 steps: (1) exploring the problem by assessing the relationship between medication adherence and implicit attitudes, (2) defining change objectives, (3) selecting evidence-based behavior change techniques that focused on adjusting implicit attitudes, (4) designing the intervention, (5) guaranteeing implementation by focusing on intrinsic motivation, and (6) planning a scientific evaluation. Results Based on the problem assessment and guided by the Dual-Attitude Model, implicit negative and illness-related attitudes of patients with RA were defined as the main target for the intervention. Consequently, the change objective was “after the intervention, participants have a more positive attitude toward antirheumatic drugs.” Attention bias modification, evaluative conditioning, and goal priming were the techniques chosen to implicitly target medication needs. These techniques were redesigned into medication-related triggers and built in the serious puzzle game. Thirty-seven patients with RA tested the game at several stages. Intrinsic motivation was led by the self-determination theory and addressed the 3 needs, that is, competence, autonomy, and relatedness. The intervention will be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial that assesses the effect of playing the serious game on antirheumatic drug adherence. Conclusions We systematically developed a serious game app to enhance adherence to antirheumatic drugs among patients with RA by using the intervention mapping framework. This paper could serve as a guideline for other health care providers when developing similar interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Ph Pouls
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Bart Jf van den Bemt
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Otte R, Roodbeen R, Boland G, Noordman J, van Dulmen S. Affective communication with patients with limited health literacy in the palliative phase of COPD or lung cancer: Analysis of video-recorded consultations in outpatient care. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0263433. [PMID: 35143534 PMCID: PMC8830703 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Affective communication in outpatient care is important, especially in the palliative phase. Appropriate responses by healthcare providers to emotional cues or concerns let patients express their feelings and enhance information recall and patient satisfaction. Patients with limited health literacy experience more barriers in health-related communication and information, which makes recognizing their cues and concerns even more relevant. This study explores emotional cues/concerns expressed by patients with limited health literacy and evaluates healthcare providers’ responses to these utterances. Methods Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES), a consensus-based system for coding patients’ expression of emotional distress in medical consultations, was used in this exploratory observational study to analyse affective communication in video-recorded outpatient consultations. Consultations of 18 (10 female, 8 male) COPD or lung cancer patients (aged 70.3±6.8) with limited health literacy were recorded and analysed. Eight healthcare providers in four hospitals participated in the study. Results 101 cues and 11 concerns were observed, making 6.2 (SD = 4.2) cues or concerns per consultation. Healthcare provider responses were explicit in 56% and left scope for further disclosures in 58% of the cases. Patients with limited health literacy seem to express more cues or concerns than other patient populations. Healthcare providers responded roughly equally often in five different ways, but they shied away from further exploring the emotion disclosed in the cue/concern. Future research should elaborate on these exploratory observations, especially regarding why HCPs often only leave limited space for further disclosure of emotions in palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Otte
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Breuer&Intraval, Research and Consultancy, Research Department, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sanders ARJ, de Wit NJ, Zuithoff NPA, van Dulmen S. The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives. BMC Prim Care 2022; 23:22. [PMID: 35172742 PMCID: PMC8809011 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly accepted in healthcare and has demonstrated merits for several psychological outcomes, the effect on recovery from somatic conditions is still subject to debate. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of SDM on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain (LBP). Methods This study is a post-hoc analysis of data from a cluster-randomised trial that evaluated the effectiveness of SDM on recovery in patients with non-chronic aspecific LBP. In this analysis, we re-evaluate the impact of SDM from three perspectives: that of external observers, participating GPs and participating patients. Recovery was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and with the Roland Morris Disability questionnaire (RMD) and defined as a VAS < 30 and an RMD < 4. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effect of SDM on recovery at 6 and 26 weeks. Results At 26 weeks, 105 (74%) of all 176 included patients had recovered. No significant effect of SDM on recovery at 6 or 26 weeks after the consultation was found when considering SDM from an observer perspective or a patient perspective. From a GP perspective SDM had a significant effect on recovery, but at 26 weeks only, and with the lowest probability of recovery observed at a medium level of GP-perceived SDM. Conclusions We found no evidence that SDM as perceived by the patient or by external observation improves recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain. The long-term recovery may be better for patients in whom the GP perceives SDM during their consultations. Further research should highlight the hierarchy and the relation between the perspectives, which is needed to come to an integral effect evaluation of SDM. Trial registration The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NTR1960. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariëtte R J Sanders
- Julius centre for health sciences and primary care, University medical centre Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Niek J de Wit
- Julius centre for health sciences and primary care, University medical centre Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- Julius centre for health sciences and primary care, University medical centre Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of primary and community care, Radboud university edical center, Radboud institute for health sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Engelen M, van Gaal B, Vermeulen H, Zuidema R, Bredie S, van Dulmen S. The influencing contexts and potential mechanisms behind the use of online self-management support interventions: a realist evaluation (Preprint). JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 9:e34925. [PMID: 35776437 PMCID: PMC9288100 DOI: 10.2196/34925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-management can increase self-efficacy and quality of life and improve disease outcomes. Effective self-management may also help reduce the pressure on health care systems. However, patients need support in dealing with their disease and in developing skills to manage the consequences and changes associated with their condition. Web-based self-management support programs have helped patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but program use has been low. Objective This study aimed to identify the patient, disease, and program characteristics that determine whether patients use web-based self-management support programs or not. Methods A realistic evaluation methodology was used to provide a comprehensive overview of context (patient and disease characteristics), mechanism (program characteristics), and outcome (program use). Secondary data of adult patients with CVD (n=101) and those with RA (n=77) were included in the study. The relationship between context (sex, age, education, employment status, living situation, self-management [measured using Patient Activation Measure-13], quality of life [measured using RAND 36-item health survey], interaction efficacy [measured using the 5-item perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions], diagnosis, physical comorbidity, and time since diagnosis) and outcome (program use) was analyzed using logistic regression analyses. The relationship between mechanism (program design, implementation strategies, and behavior change techniques [BCTs]) and outcome was analyzed through a qualitative interview study. Results This study included 68 nonusers and 111 users of web-based self-management support programs, of which 56.4% (101/179) were diagnosed with CVD and 43.6% (78/179) with RA. Younger age and a lower level of education were associated with program use. An interaction effect was found between program use and diagnosis and 4 quality of life subscales (social functioning, physical role limitations, vitality, and bodily pain). Patients with CVD with higher self-management and quality of life scores were less likely to use the program, whereas patients with RA with higher self-management and quality of life scores were more likely to use the program. Interviews with 10 nonusers, 10 low users, and 18 high users were analyzed to provide insight into the relationship between mechanisms and outcome. Program use was encouraged by an easy-to-use, clear, and transparent design and by recommendations from professionals and email reminders. A total of 5 BCTs were identified as potential mechanisms to promote program use: tailored information, self-reporting behavior, delayed feedback, providing information on peer behavior, and modeling. Conclusions This realistic evaluation showed that certain patient, disease, and program characteristics (age, education, diagnosis, program design, type of reminder, and BCTs) are associated with the use of web-based self-management support programs. These results represent the first step in improving the tailoring of web-based self-management support programs. Future research on the interaction between patient and program characteristics should be conducted to improve the tailoring of participants to program components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marscha Engelen
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Betsie van Gaal
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hester Vermeulen
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Rixt Zuidema
- Research Group Proactive Care for Older People, Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Bredie
- Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Nivel - Netherlands institute for health services research, Department of Communication in healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Westendorp J, Evers AWM, Stouthard JML, Budding J, van der Wall E, Plum NMF, Velting M, Francke AL, van Dulmen S, Olde Hartman TC, Van Vliet LM. Mind your words: Oncologists' communication that potentially harms patients with advanced cancer: A survey on patient perspectives. Cancer 2021; 128:1133-1140. [PMID: 34762305 PMCID: PMC9298810 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many complaints in medicine and in advanced illnesses are about communication. Little is known about which specific communications harm. This study explored the perspectives of patients with advanced cancer about potentially harmful communication behaviors by oncologists and helpful alternatives. METHODS An online survey design was used that was based on literature scoping and patient/clinician/researcher input. Patients with advanced cancer (n = 74) reflected on the potential harmfulness of 19 communication situations. They were asked whether they perceived the situation as one in which communication could be harmful (yes/no). If they answered "yes," they were asked whether they perceived the examples as harmful (yes/no) or helpful (yes/no) and to provide open comments. Results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively (content analysis). RESULTS Communication regarding information provision, prognosis discussion, decision-making, and empathy could be unnecessarily potentially harmful, and this occurred in various ways, such as making vague promises instead of concrete ones (92%), being too directive in decision-making (qualitative), and not listening to the patient (88%). Not all patients considered other situations potentially harmful (eg, introducing the option of refraining from anticancer therapy [49%] and giving too much [prognostic] information [60%]). Exploring each individual patients' needs/preferences seemed to be a precondition for helpful communication. CONCLUSIONS This article provides patient perspectives on oncologists' unnecessarily potentially harmful communication behaviors and offers practical tools to improve communication in advanced cancer care. Both preventable pitfalls and delicate challenges requiring an individualized approach, where exploration might help, are described. Although providing difficult and unwelcome news is a core task for clinicians, this study might help them to do so while preventing potentially unnecessary harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Westendorp
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole M F Plum
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Velting
- Dutch Breast Cancer Association (BVN), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tim C Olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M Van Vliet
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Stortenbeker I, Olde Hartman T, Kwerreveld A, Stommel W, van Dulmen S, Das E. Unexplained versus explained symptoms: The difference is not in patients' language use. A quantitative analysis of linguistic markers. J Psychosom Res 2021; 152:110667. [PMID: 34775157 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are believed to have a deviant way of talking about complaints. This study systematically compared linguistic markers in symptom presentations of patients with MUS and medically explained symptoms (MES). METHODS This content analysis (cross-sectional study) conceptualized relevant linguistic markers based on previous research about MUS communication. Linguistic markers included negations ("not"), intensifiers ("very"), diminishers ("a little"), first or third person subject ("I" vs. "my body"), subjectivity markers ("I think") and abstraction ("I'm gasping for breath" vs. "I'm short of breath"). We also coded valence, reference to physical or mental states, and consultation phase. We compared 41 MUS and 41 MES transcribed video-recorded general practice consultations. Data were analyzed with binary random intercepts models. RESULTS We selected and coded 2752 relevant utterances. Patients with MUS used less diminishers compared to patients with MES, but this main effect disappeared when consultation phase was included as predictor. For all other linguistic variables, the analyses did not reveal any variation in language use based on whether patients had MUS or MES. Importantly, utterances' valence and reference to physical or mental state did predict the use of linguistic markers. CONCLUSION We observed no systematic variations in linguistic markers for patients who suffered from MUS compared to MES. Patients varied their language use based on utterances' valence and reference to physical or mental states. Current ideas about deviant patient communication may be based on stigmatized perceptions of how patients with MUS communicate, rather than actual differences in their talk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Stortenbeker
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anita Kwerreveld
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wyke Stommel
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Enny Das
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mentink M, Noordman J, Busch M, van Vliet L, Timmer-Bonte JA, van Dulmen S. Towards an open and effective dialogue on complementary medicine in oncology: protocol of patient participatory study 'COMMON'. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053005. [PMID: 34670766 PMCID: PMC8529983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately half of patients with cancer use some form of complementary medicine alongside conventional cancer treatment. The topic of complementary medicine often remains undiscussed in consultations between patients with cancer and their healthcare providers. This results in increased risks for adverse or interaction effects and decreased access to the benefits of evidence-based complementary medicine for patients with cancer. This paper describes the design of patient participatory study titled 'COMMON' that aims to explore and enhance open and effective communication about complementary medicine in oncology. The study is carried out in collaboration with 12 (former) patients with breast cancer as coresearchers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study complies with the six steps of the intervention mapping framework. Three non-academic hospitals recruit participants (patients with cancer, oncology healthcare providers and managers) for interviews about the organisation, experiences and needs regarding complementary medicine. To assess communication about complementary medicine, recorded oncology consultations are analysed. For an overview of evidence-based complementary medicine available to patients with cancer, a review of reviews is conducted on the evidence on cancer patient-reported outcomes of complementary medicine frequently used by patients with cancer, supplemented with an online search and survey among organisations and persons providing complementary medicine to patients with cancer. Together, these steps generate input for the development of a toolbox that supports an open and effective discussion on complementary medicine in oncology. In a pilot study, acceptability and usability of the toolbox are assessed among patients with cancer and oncology healthcare providers. Dissemination of the toolbox is covered by the commitment of stakeholder parties. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Ethics Committee Arnhem-Nijmegen declared the study was exempted from formal approval under the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The results will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed publications, stakeholder-reporting and presentations at relevant conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Mentink
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Liesbeth van Vliet
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Vliet LM, Meijers MC, van Dulmen S, van der Wall E, Plum N, Stouthard J, Francke AL. Addressing challenges in information-provision: a qualitative study among oncologists and women with advanced breast cancer. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:142. [PMID: 34521393 PMCID: PMC8442372 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00836-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for more insight into how to address challenges of information-provision for women with advanced breast cancer. We aimed to explore oncologists' and patients' views on (i) the challenges of information-provision, and (ii) possible strategies to address these challenges, meanwhile (iii) exploring the possible facilitating role of positive expectations and empathy. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were held with oncologists (n = 10) and women with advanced breast cancer (n = 14). Principles of Thematic Analysis were followed, with two researchers analyzing transcribed data, supported by Atlas.ti software. RESULTS Taken together the data from oncologists and patients, we found that when communicating with patients with advanced cancer, oncologists face challenges, including handling patients' unrealistic disease (status) beliefs, and choosing approaches for discussing available treatment options and their side effects. Possible strategies to address these challenges include balancing information with acceptance of denial, and using medical expertise to guide treatment discussions. A sensitive issue is whether to discuss the option of no anti-cancer treatment. Meanwhile, approaches and preferences for discussions of side effects vary. Positive expectations and empathy can facilitate information-provision by creating space and helping patients to open up more. CONCLUSIONS Integrating oncologists' and patients' views, oncologists can provide realistic information while also, temporarily, accepting denial, and can use their medical expertise to address challenges around unrealistic beliefs and discussion of treatment options. Finding ways to tailor discussions of no anti-cancer treatment and side-effect information are needed. Positive expectations and empathy might facilitate - tailored - information-provision, leading ultimately to patient-centered care lying at the heart of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Maartje C Meijers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Plum
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sieben A, A.W. van Onzenoort H, J.H.M. van Laarhoven K, Bredie SJ, van Dulmen S. Identification of Cardiovascular Patient Groups at Risk for Poor Medication Adherence: A Cluster Analysis. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2021; 36:489-497. [PMID: 32501862 PMCID: PMC8366598 DOI: 10.1097/jcn.0000000000000702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor medication adherence limits the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and leads to increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Identifying groups of patients at risk of poor adherence behavior could enable an intervention to be developed and target patients appropriately. OBJECTIVE The first aim of this study was to identify homogeneous subgroups of cardiovascular outpatients based on their cardiovascular risk factors. Subsequently, differences in medication adherence between these groups were examined. METHODS In this retrospective, observational study, patients with an established CVD were included. Well-known cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, diet, exercise, blood lipid levels, blood pressure, and body mass index were collected. To identify patient subgroups, a 2-step cluster analytic procedure was performed. Differences between the groups on medication adherence were determined on the outcome of the Modified Morisky Scale. Data collection took place between October 2011 and January 2013. RESULTS Cardiovascular risk factors of 530 patients were included in the cluster analysis. Three groups were identified. Compared with other clusters (clusters 1 and 2), cluster 3 contained significantly fewer patients who could be classified as highly adherent and more patients classified as medium adherent (23% and 57%, respectively; P = .024). This group was characterized by a younger age (53% were <55 years old) and using a relatively low number of different medications (41% used <4 different medications). Besides, in this subgroup the most smokers (37%), unhealthy alcohol users (27%), and patients with unhealthy eating habits (14%) were present. CONCLUSION This study showed that cardiovascular patients who are relatively young and have an unhealthy lifestyle are at risk for nonadherent behavior.
Collapse
|
37
|
van Dulmen S, Peereboom E, Schulze L, Prantl K, Rookmaaker M, van Jaarsveld BC, Abrahams AC, Roodbeen R. The use of implicit persuasion in decision-making about treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Perit Dial Int 2021; 42:377-386. [PMID: 34212786 DOI: 10.1177/08968608211027019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are various options for managing end-stage kidney disease. Each option impacts the lives of patients differently. When weighing the pros and cons of the different options, patients' values, needs and preferences should, therefore, be taken into account. However, despite the best intentions, nephrologists may, more or less deliberately, convey a treatment preference and thereby steer the decision-making process. Being aware of such implicit persuasion could help to further optimise shared decision-making (SDM). This study explores verbal acts of implicit persuasion during outpatient consultations scheduled to make a final treatment decision. These consultations mark the end of a multi-consultation, educational process and summarise treatment aspects discussed previously. METHODS Observations of video-recorded outpatient consultations in nephrology (n = 20) were used to capture different forms of implicit persuasion. To this purpose, a coding scheme was developed. RESULTS In nearly every consultation nephrologists used some form of implicit persuasion. Frequently observed behaviours included selectively presenting treatment options, benefits and harms, and giving the impression that undergoing or foregoing treatment is unusual. The extent to which nephrologists used these behaviours differed. CONCLUSION The use of implicit persuasion while discussing different kidney replacement modalities appears diverse and quite common. Nephrologists should be made aware of these behaviours as implicit persuasion might prevent patients to become knowledgeable in each treatment option, thereby affecting SDM and causing decisional regret. The developed coding scheme for observing implicit persuasion elicits useful and clinically relevant examples which could be used when providing feedback to nephrologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Communication in healthcare, Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud institute for health sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Peereboom
- Department of Communication in healthcare, Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Schulze
- Department of Communication in healthcare, Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Prantl
- Dutch Kidney Patients Association, Bussum, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Rookmaaker
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brigit C van Jaarsveld
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Diapriva Dialysis Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Department of Communication in healthcare, Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Roodbeen RTJ, Noordman J, Boland G, van Dulmen S. Shared Decision Making in Practice and the Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Video-Recorded Consultations With Patients With Low Health Literacy in the Palliative Phase of Their Disease. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211023472. [PMID: 34277951 PMCID: PMC8255606 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211023472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction. An important goal of palliative care is improving the quality of life of patients and their partners/families. To attain this goal, requirements and preferences of patients need to be discussed, preferably through shared decision making (SDM). This enhances patient autonomy and patient-centeredness, requiring active participation by patients. This is demanding for palliative patients, and even more so for patients with limited health literacy (LHL). This study aimed to examine SDM in practice and assess health care professionals’ perspectives on their own SDM. Methods. An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. Video recordings were gathered cross-sectionally of palliative care consultations with LHL patients (n = 36) conducted by specialized palliative care clinicians and professionals integrating a palliative approach. The consultations were observed for SDM using the OPTION5 instrument. Potential determinants of SDM were examined using multilevel analysis. Sequentially, stimulated recall interviews were conducted assessing the perspectives of professionals on their SDM (n = 19). Interviews were examined using deductive thematic content analysis. Results. The average SDM score in practice was moderate, varying greatly between professionals, as shown by the multilevel analysis and by varying degrees of perceived patient involvement in SDM mentioned in the interviews. To improve this, professionals recommended 1) continuously discussing all options with patients, 2) allowing time for patients to talk, and 3) using strategic timing for involving patients in SDM. Discussion. The implementation of SDM for people with LHL in palliative care varies in quality and needs improvement. SDM needs to be enhanced in this care domain because decisions are complex and demanding for LHL patients. Future research is needed that focuses on supporting strategies for comprehensible SDM, best practices, and organizational adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud T J Roodbeen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Engelen M, van Dulmen S, Vermeulen H, de Laat E, van Gaal B. The content and effectiveness of self-management support interventions for people at risk of pressure ulcers: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 122:104014. [PMID: 34274772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressure ulcers are a common complication with a high impact on well-being and quality of life in people with impaired mobility and/or dysfunctional pain sensations. Prevention is therefore crucial. However, persons at risk seem to experience difficulties in adhering to self-management regimens that can help to prevent or diminish the development of pressure ulcers. Self-management support interventions might help to improve their self-management skills. OBJECTIVES To review the content, components and effectiveness of self-management support interventions on clinical and behavioral outcomes for people at risk of pressure ulcers. METHODS A systematic literature search for the period of January 2000 to February 2020 was conducted in five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria were: (1) studies including persons at a high risk of pressure ulcers; (2) studies investigating interventions focused on self-management support; (3) studies describing clinical and behavioral outcomes related to prevention and care of pressure ulcers. All studies were independently screened on title, abstracts and full text by two researchers. The PRISMS taxonomy of 14 components was used to code intervention content. RESULTS The search yielded 5297 papers, which resulted in the inclusion of 16 papers on self-management support interventions for persons at risk of pressure ulcers. Interventions focused mostly on 'Information about condition and/or management' (13 interventions), 'Training in practical self-management activities' (7 interventions), and 'Training in psychological strategies' (6 interventions). 'Provision of equipment' was not investigated. The intensity of the interventions varied in delivery mode, frequency and duration. Improvements were found in clinical outcomes in four studies and in behavioral outcomes in ten studies. Four studies showed improvements in clinical outcomes and ten studies in behavioral outcomes. Knowledge was positively influenced in eight studies. CONCLUSION Self-management support interventions show potential. The extensiveness and intensity of the interventions seem to be predictive for the effectiveness, but specific content components cannot be recommended. This review revealed recommendations for future research and international consensus should be reached about patient-relevant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marscha Engelen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hester Vermeulen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; HAN University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Studies, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Erik de Laat
- Radboud university medical center, Department of Plastic Surgery, The Netherlands.
| | - Betsie van Gaal
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; HAN University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Studies, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van der Smissen D, Rietjens JAC, van Gemert-Pijnen L, van Dulmen S, van der Heide A, Korfage IJ. Information needs of patients with chronic diseases and their relatives for web-based advance care planning: a qualitative interview study. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:77. [PMID: 34053435 PMCID: PMC8164830 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00770-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) enables persons to identify preferences for future treatment and care, and to discuss, record and review these preferences. However, the uptake of ACP among patients with chronic diseases is relatively low. Web-based ACP programs can support patients and their relatives in ACP. However, information needs of patients and their relatives for ACP are unknown. The aim of this study is to explore information needs of patients with chronic disease and their relatives for web-based ACP. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients with chronic diseases and relatives at their home or at the study center. In three cases, the patient and relative were paired since they preferred to be interviewed together. We asked about information they would search for when to start with ACP, where they would search for information, what search terms they would use on the Internet, and what content and information they would consider important on an ACP website. The interviewer asked participants to clarify their responses during the interview. We used thematic analysis to analyze the interviewees' responses. RESULTS We interviewed nine patients with different chronic diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and kidney diseases, and seven relatives, namely partners or (adult) children. The interviewees were aged 24 to 80 years, nine were female and seven were male. Both patients with a chronic disease and relatives mentioned comparable information needs. Many interviewees indicated they would use the Internet to search for information about ACP. Mentioned search terms were "advance care planning", "treatment plan", "disease trajectory" and names of patient associations. Information needs concerned their disease trajectory and quality of life, medical treatment decisions, practical support in arranging care, the concept of ACP and guidance in ACP, communication of treatment and care preferences, peer support of others with chronic diseases, and information for relatives. Many appreciated encouragement of their healthcare providers to take a pro-active role in ACP. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that information needs for ACP included guidance in ACP, support in making decisions about medical treatment, and practical support in arranging care. We recommend adapting web-based ACP information to the information needs of patients and their relatives to increase its findability, uptake and usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris van der Smissen
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000 the Netherlands
| | - Judith A. C. Rietjens
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000 the Netherlands
| | - Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen
- grid.6214.10000 0004 0399 8953Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands ,grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000 the Netherlands
| | - Ida J. Korfage
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000 the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Heuckelum M, van den Ende CHM, van Dulmen S, van den Bemt BJF. Electronic Monitoring Feedback for Improving Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1107-1119. [PMID: 34079231 PMCID: PMC8164714 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s297170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-adherence to medication (range 30-107%) is a major issue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous research has shown that electronic monitoring feedback (EMF) might be an effective strategy to improve medication adherence in chronic conditions. Therefore, this study investigated the effectiveness of electronic monitoring feedback in patients with early RA to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes compared to usual care. METHODS An open-label randomized clinical trial was performed to compare EMF with standard care during a 12-month follow-up period on two sites of the Sint Maartenskliniek (Nijmegen and Boxmeer) in the Netherlands. Patients were eligible if they: (1) had a (working) diagnosis of early RA, (2) were currently using methotrexate, (3) were aged ≥18 years, and (4) had a life expectancy of ≥12 months. Primary outcome was the difference in proportion of non-adherent patients measured with the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were beliefs about medicines, medication adherence measured with the MMAS-8®, patients' health status, prescription of biologic DMARDs, and disease activity after 12 months. RESULTS Of the 367 initially-invited patients, 93 patients with early RA agreed to participate in this study. No significant difference was found in the proportion of non-adherent patients between the intervention arm and the usual care arm after 12 months follow-up (60.0% and 61.3%, p=0.93, respectively). Patients in the intervention arm tended to discontinue methotrexate earlier than patients in the usual care arm (median time in weeks: 15.7 (9.1-33.6) and 21.9 (19-28.4), respectively, p=0.31), whereas patients in the usual care arm tended to initiate biologic DMARDs earlier than those in the intervention arm (median time in weeks: 11.9 (5.7-22) and 17 (9.9-40.9), respectively, p=0.55). CONCLUSION This study illustrates the challenge of targeting non-adherence with EMF in patients with early RA and shares important lessons learned about designing adherence intervention trials with respect to study attrition, accounting for drug survival, intervention fidelity, intervention uptake, and technical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milou van Heuckelum
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelia H M van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
van Vliet LM, Noordman J, Mijnlieff M, Roodbeen R, Boland G, van Dulmen S. Health literacy, information provision and satisfaction in advanced cancer consultations: two observational studies using level of education as a proxy. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2020-002859. [PMID: 34006513 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with low health literacy (LHL) might feel less informed and satisfied with provided information than patients with high health literacy (HHL). In the setting of advanced cancer, we explored whether LHL patients, compared with HHL patients are: (1) often less informed, and (2) less satisfied with clinicians' communication (a) in general and (b) following information provision specifically. METHODS Data from two observational studies using recorded consultations were combined. Clinicians' provided information and patients' health literacy level-defined by educational levels-and satisfaction were measured. Χ2 tests and regression (moderation) analyses assessed the relation between health literacy and information provision, and between information provision and satisfaction, meanwhile exploring moderating influences of health literacy. RESULTS Of 61 included patients, 25 (41%) had LHL. LHL and HHL patients were equally seldom informed about the disease's incurability (36% vs 42%, p=0.66). LHL patients were more often informed about the option of not pursuing anticancer therapy than HHL patients (28% vs 8%, p=0.04). LHL patients were more satisfied with clinicians' communication than HHL patients (M=9.3 vs M=8.5, p=0.03), especially when the option of no anticancer treatment was discussed (p=0.04). Discussing the disease's incurability did not influence satisfaction levels (p=0.58) for LHL and HHL patients. CONCLUSIONS LHL patients were not less informed, yet more satisfied than HHL patients. Both groups were equally seldom informed about the disease's incurability. No anticancer therapy was mostly discussed with LHL patients who were more satisfied following this information. Clinicians should be encouraged to inform all patients about the disease status and (non)treatment options, while not overlooking empathic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Marit Mijnlieff
- Department of Communication, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Department of Communication, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Center of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Communication, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Institute for Healh Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Westendorp J, Stouthard J, Meijers MC, Neyrinck BAM, de Jong P, van Dulmen S, van Vliet LM. The power of clinician-expressed empathy to increase information recall in advanced breast cancer care: an observational study in clinical care, exploring the mediating role of anxiety. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:1109-1115. [PMID: 33168460 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Experimental studies have found that clinician-expressed empathy improves patients' information recall in (advanced) cancer consultations. It remains unclear, however, whether these results are generalizable to clinical care and, if so, what the underlying mechanism is. We aimed to i) determine the relationship between clinician-expressed empathy and patients' information recall in clinical advanced breast cancer consultations; and ii) test whether the relationship between clinician-expressed empathy and recall is mediated by a decrease in patients' anxiety. METHODS Forty-one consultations between oncologists and female patients with advanced breast cancer were audio recorded. Patients' post-consultation information recall and pre- and post-consultation anxiety (0-100) were assessed. Recall was scored according to a self-created questionnaire. Clinician-expressed empathy (0-100) was assessed by observers. Structural Equation Modelling was used for all analyses. RESULTS Participants remembered 61% of the information discussed. Clinician-expressed empathy significantly increased patients' total information recall (p = .041) and recall of treatment aims/positive effects (p = .028). The mediating role of anxiety could not be established. CONCLUSION Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, clinicians have a powerful tool to improve seriously ill breast cancer patients' recall of information: empathy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These insights should encourage clinicians to express empathy; practical communication training might prove helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Westendorp
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maartje C Meijers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bart A M Neyrinck
- Clinical Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht the Netherlands
| | | | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Houwen J, Lucassen PLBJ, Stappers HW, van Spaendonck K, van Duijnhoven A, Hartman TCO, van Dulmen S. How to learn skilled communication in primary care MUS consultations: a focus group study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021; 39:101-110. [PMID: 33569982 PMCID: PMC7971340 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1882088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many general practitioners (GPs) experience communication problems in medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) consultations as they are insufficiently equipped with adequate communication skills or do not apply these in MUS consultations. OBJECTIVE To define the most important learnable communication elements during MUS consultations according to MUS patients, GPs, MUS experts and teachers and to explore how these elements should be taught to GPs and GP trainees. METHODS Five focus groups were conducted with homogeneous groups of MUS patients, GPs, MUS experts and teachers. MUS patients and GPs formulated a list of important communication elements. MUS experts identified from this list the most important communication elements. Teachers explored how these elements could be trained to GPs and GP trainees. Two researchers independently analysed the data applying the principles of constant comparative analysis. RESULTS MUS patients and GPs identified a list of important communication elements. From this list, MUS experts selected five important communication elements: (1) thorough somatic and psychosocial exploration, (2) communication with empathy, (3) creating a shared understanding of the problem, (4) providing a tangible explanation and (5) taking control. Teachers described three teaching methods for these communication elements: (1) awareness and reflection of GPs about their feelings towards MUS patients, (2) assessment of GPs' individual needs and (3) training and supervision in daily practice. CONCLUSION Teachers consider a focus on personal attitudes and needs, which should be guided by opportunities to practice and receive supervision, as the best method to teach GPs about communication in MUS consultations.KEY POINTSMany GPs experience difficulties in communication with patients with MUS.There is a need to equip GPs with communication skills to manage MUS consultations more adequately.Role-playing with simulation patients, reflection on video-consultations and joint consultations with the supervisor may increase the GPs' awareness of their attitude towards MUS patients and may help GPs to identify their individual learning-points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juul Houwen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- CONTACT Juul Houwen Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein, 21, Nijmegen6525 EZ, The Netherlands
| | - Peter L. B. J. Lucassen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo W. Stappers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Karel van Spaendonck
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aniek van Duijnhoven
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim C. olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pouls BPH, Vriezekolk JE, Bekker CL, Linn AJ, van Onzenoort HAW, Vervloet M, van Dulmen S, van den Bemt BJF. Effect of Interactive eHealth Interventions on Improving Medication Adherence in Adults With Long-Term Medication: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e18901. [PMID: 33416501 PMCID: PMC7822716 DOI: 10.2196/18901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Medication nonadherence leads to suboptimal treatment outcomes, making it a major priority in health care. eHealth provides an opportunity to offer medication adherence interventions with minimal effort from health care providers whose time and resources are limited. Objective The aim of this systematic review is twofold: (1) to evaluate effectiveness of recently developed and tested interactive eHealth (including mHealth) interventions on medication adherence in adult patients using long-term medication and (2) to describe strategies among effective interventions. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2014 to July 2019 as well as reference lists and citations of included articles. Eligible studies fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial with a usual care control group; (2) a total sample size of at least 50 adult patients using long-term medication; (3) applying an interactive eHealth intervention aimed at the patient or patient’s caregiver; and (4) medication adherence as primary outcome. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Selection and quality assessment of studies were performed by 2 researchers (BP and BvdB or JV) independently. A best evidence synthesis was performed according to the Cochrane Back Review Group. Results Of the 9047 records screened, 22 randomized clinical trials were included reporting on 29 interventions. Most (21/29, 72%) interventions specified using a (mobile) phone for calling, SMS text messaging, or mobile apps. A majority of all interactive interventions (17/29) had a statistically significant effect on medication adherence (P<.05). Of these interventions, 9 had at least a small effect size (Cohen d ≥ 0.2) and 3 showed strong odds for becoming adherent in the intervention group (odds ratio > 2.0). Our best evidence synthesis provided strong evidence for a positive effect of interventions using SMS text messages or interactive voice response, mobile app, and calls as mode of providing adherence tele-feedback. Intervention strategies “to teach medication management skills,” “to improve health care quality by coordinating medication adherence care between professionals,” and “to facilitate communication or decision making between patients and health care providers” also showed strong evidence for a positive effect. Conclusions Overall, this review supports the hypothesis that interactive eHealth interventions can be effective in improving medication adherence. Intervention strategies that improve patients’ treatment involvement and their medication management skills are most promising and should be considered for implementation in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart P H Pouls
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Annemiek J Linn
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam,, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hein A W van Onzenoort
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marcia Vervloet
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Giessen J, Fransen MP, Spreeuwenberg P, Velthuizen M, van Dulmen S, Ausems MGEM. Communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background: evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals. J Community Genet 2021; 12:91-99. [PMID: 33319336 PMCID: PMC7846648 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00497-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Access to breast cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal for patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background due to ineffective communication and lack of healthcare professionals' recommendation. This study examines the effect of a blended training program (Erfo4all) for healthcare professionals on their awareness, knowledge, and self-efficacy towards communication about genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background. In total, 59 breast surgeons and specialized nurses from 16 Dutch hospitals completed an online module and group training. Knowledge, self-assessed awareness, and self-efficacy were assessed before the training and 33 participants also completed a posttest questionnaire 6 months after the training program. We also assessed the perceived applicability and relevance of the training program from healthcare professionals' perspectives. We found a significant increase in self-assessed awareness of the prevalence and impact of limited health literacy and in healthcare professionals' self-efficacy to recognize limited health literacy and to communicate effectively with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background. We did not find an increase in knowledge score. Almost all healthcare professionals reported that they use the techniques learned in the training, such as the teach-back method and plain language, and felt more confident discussing breast cancer genetic counseling. Our results suggest that a blended training program for healthcare professionals has potential to improve their ability to communicate effectively about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background and offers a promising way to increase the referral rate for these groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine van der Giessen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P. O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Spreeuwenberg
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), P. O Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mary Velthuizen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), P. O Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P. O Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van Vliet LM, Godfried MB, van Deelen GW, Kaunang M, Kaptchuk TJ, van Dulmen S, Thiel B, Bensing JM. Placebo Effects of Nurses' Communication alongside Standard Medical Care on Pain and Other Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Clinical Tonsillectomy Care. Psychother Psychosom 2020; 89:56-58. [PMID: 31655817 DOI: 10.1159/000503904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Department of Anesthesiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Communication, NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B Godfried
- Department of Anesthesiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Menno Kaunang
- Department of Communication, NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ted J Kaptchuk
- Program of Placebo Studies and the Therapeutic Encounter, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Communication, NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands, .,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, .,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway,
| | - Bram Thiel
- Department of Anesthesiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jozien M Bensing
- Department of Communication, NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Noordman J, Schulze L, Roodbeen R, Boland G, van Vliet LM, van den Muijsenbergh M, van Dulmen S. Instrumental and affective communication with patients with limited health literacy in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:152. [PMID: 33028308 PMCID: PMC7542099 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00658-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients have a ‘need to know’ (instrumental need) and a ‘need to feel known’ (affective need). During consultations with patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the palliative phase of their disease, both the instrumental and the affective communication skills of healthcare providers are important. The study aims to explore instrumental and affective communication between care providers and LHL patients in the palliative phase of COPD or cancer. Methods In 2018, consultations between LHL patients in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD and their healthcare providers were video-recorded in four hospitals in the Netherlands. As there was no observation algorithm available for this setting, several items were created to parameterize healthcare providers’ instrumental communication (seven items: understanding, patient priorities, medical status, treatment options, treatment consequences, prognosis, and information about emotional distress) and affective communication (six items: hope, support, reassurance, empathy, appreciation, and emotional coping). The degree of each item was recorded for each consultation, with relevant segments of the observation selected and transcribed to support the items. Results Consultations between 17 care providers and 39 patients were video-recorded and analyzed. Care providers primarily used instrumental communication, most often by giving information about treatment options and assessing patients’ care priorities. Care providers assessed patients’ understanding of their disease less often. The patients’ prognosis was not mentioned in half the consultations. Within the affective domain, the care providers did provide support for their patients; providing hope, reassurance, empathy, and appreciation and discussing emotional coping were observed less often. Conclusions Care providers used mostly instrumental communication, especially treatment information, in consultations with LHL patients in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD. Most care providers did not check if the patient understood the information, which is rather crucial, especially given patients’ limited level of health literacy. Healthcare providers did provide support for patients, but other expressions of affective communication by care providers were less common. To adapt the communication to LHL patients in palliative care, care providers could be less wordy and reduce the amount of information, use ‘teach-back’ techniques and pay more attention to affective communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Lotte Schulze
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ruud Roodbeen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Tranzo Scientific Centre for Care and Well-being, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sundling V, Hafskjold L, Eklund JH, Holmström IK, Höglander J, Sundler AJ, van Dulmen S, Eide H. Emotional communication in home care: A comparison between Norway and Sweden. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:1546-1553. [PMID: 32173215 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the free movement of workers across countries, knowledge regarding communication differences between countries is imperative. In this study, we explored and compared the supportive responses of nursing staff to older persons' emotions in home care in Norway and Sweden. METHODS The study had an observational, cross-sectional, comparative design, which included 383 audio-recorded home-care visits. Communication was coded using Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences. Worries and responses were categorised with regard to reference, communicative function and level of person-centredness. Standard statistical tests were used to analyse the data. RESULTS The Swedish nursing staff provided space for further disclosure of worry more frequently than the Norwegian nursing staff (75.0 % versus 60.2 %, χ2 = 20.758, p < 0.01). In all, 65 % of the responses were supportive. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that highly person-centred responses were independently associated with worries phrasing an emotion, OR (95 % CI) 3.282 (1.524-7.067). CONCLUSION The level of person-centredness was associated with the way in which older persons expressed their distress. The Swedish nursing staff provided opportunities for further disclosure of worries more frequently than the Norwegian nursing staff. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Findings of intercultural differences should be incorporated into the training of nursing staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibeke Sundling
- Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway; National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway; Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway.
| | - Linda Hafskjold
- Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway; Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway
| | | | - Inger K Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jessica Höglander
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Annelie J Sundler
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Sweden
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway; NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde Eide
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Engelen MM, van Dulmen S, Puijk-Hekman S, Vermeulen H, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Bredie SJ, van Gaal BG. Evaluation of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Explorative Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17422. [PMID: 32706708 PMCID: PMC7414414 DOI: 10.2196/17422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Web-based self-management programs have the potential to support patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in their self-management (eg, by focusing on behavior change and improving physical activity). The intervention mapping framework was used to develop a web-based program called Vascular View. The Vascular View program contained 6 modules (coping with CVD, setting boundaries, lifestyle, healthy nutrition, being physically active, interaction with health professionals) aiming to increase self-management behavior by tailoring to the perceived problems and (support) needs of patients after CVD. Objective The aim was to test the effectiveness of Vascular View before embarking on a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) by evaluating the potential effectiveness and effect sizes of the Vascular View program and identifying outcome measures most likely to capture the potential benefits. Methods An explorative RCT was performed. Both control and intervention groups received care as usual and, in addition, the intervention group received 12 months of access to a web-based self-management program. Assessment occurred at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Outcome measures included general patient-reported outcome measurements: Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), Rand-36, Patient Activation Measure, and patient self-efficacy. Module-specific patient-reported outcome measurements were Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Dutch Healthy Diet Index, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction. Linear mixed models for repeated measures using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis were applied to study differences between the patients in the intervention and control groups. Floor and ceiling effects were explored to give insight into the outcome measures most likely to capture the potential benefits. Results A total of 105 patients in the control group and 103 patients in the intervention group participated in the study. A positive direction of change between baseline and 12 months was shown for most outcome measurements in favor of the intervention group, of which 2 out of 10 outcomes showed a significant effect: attribution of cause of the disease to risk factors and immunity factors (IPQ) and dependency of nicotine (FTND). Floor and ceiling effects were seen in the IPQ, Rand-36, and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Conclusions No conclusion for the efficacy of the Vascular View program or selection of outcome measurements can be taken yet. A process evaluation will be conducted to gain thorough insight into the working elements of the program, patient needs in eHealth, and the use of the program by patients. This can determine for whom web-based self-management programs will work and help to adapt the program. Trial Registration Dutch Trial Register NTR5412; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5303 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/resprot.6352
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marscha M Engelen
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Saskia Puijk-Hekman
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hester Vermeulen
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastian Jh Bredie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Betsie Gi van Gaal
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|