Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Tocilizumab for Severe Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis Refractory to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Multicenter Study of Twenty-Five Patients

Importance of Baseline Fluorescein Angiography for Patients Presenting to Tertiary Uveitis Clinic

PURPOSE

To ascertain whether the use of ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) at baseline visit alters the assessment of disease activity and localization, as well as the management of patients presenting to a tertiary uveitis clinic.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of diagnostic approaches.

METHODS

Baseline visits of 158 patients who presented to the Uveitis Clinic at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated by 3 uveitis-trained ophthalmologists (I.K., A.B., and H.G.). Each eye had undergone clinical examination along with ultra-wide-field fundus photography (UWFFP) (Optos Plc), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Spectralis Heidelberg, Heidelberg Engineering) and UWFFA (Optos Plc) at the baseline visit. Investigators were asked to successively determine disease activity, localization of disease (anterior, posterior or both), and management decisions based on clinical examination and UWFFP and SD-OCT (Set 1) and Set 1 plus UWFFA (Set 2). The primary outcome was the percentage of eyes whose management changed based on the availability of UWFFA compared with Set 1.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 46.9 ± 22.4 years (range, 7-96), and 91 (57.6%) were female. With Set 1 alone, 138 eyes (55.2%) were found to have active disease; localization was anterior in 58 eyes (42.0%), posterior in 53 eyes (38.4%), and anterior + posterior in 27 eyes (19.6%). With Set 2, 169 eyes of 107 patients had active anterior, posterior, or panuveitis. In comparison with Set 1, assessment with Set 2 identified additional 31 eyes (18.3%) with active disease (P = .006) and an additional 31 eyes (18.3%) having disease in both anterior + posterior segments (P < .001). Regarding the primary outcome, management was changed in 68 eyes (27.4%) in Set 2 compared with Set 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline UWFFA may alter assessment of disease activity, localization, and management decisions compared with clinical examination with only UWFFP and SD-OCT for eyes with uveitis. Thus, UWFFA may be considered as an essential tool in the evaluation of patients with uveitis at the baseline visit.

How should we approach management of childhood onset chronic anterior uveitis refractory to adalimumab?

INTRODUCTION

The management of refractory juvenile idiopathic associated uveitis (JIAU) or childhood-onset chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) is a challenge. There is no clear consensus or evidence base for to suggest the most appropriate therapy after primary or secondary failure of biweekly adalimumab. In this scenario, most clinicians advocate switching to another anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor; however, there are a variety of other disease modifying agents to choose from albeit with a differing levels of evidence.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss how to define nonresponse and potential treatment options for patients with JIAU and CAU refractory to biweekly adalimumab.

EXPERT OPINION

Uncontrolled CAU and JIAU remain one of the most challenging diseases to manage and can lead to irreversible loss of vision in a third of those affected. Amongst the possible choices, weekly adalimumab, infliximab, tocilizumab and abatacept have more evidence to support their use. JAK inhibitors seem to be a promising option. Golimumab and Rituximab has also been thought to be partially effective in some refractory cases, whereas IL-17, IL-23, and IL-12 inhibition along with apremilast seem not to be a therapeutic option currently. The route of administration should also be considered as there can be significant pros and cons for different children.

Taiwan ocular inflammation society consensus recommendations for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

We presented the development of a consensus guideline for managing juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIAU) in Taiwan, considering regional differences in manifestation and epidemiology. The Taiwan Ocular Inflammation Society (TOIS) committee formulated this guideline using a modified Delphi approach with two panel meetings. Recommendations were based on a comprehensive evidence-based literature review and expert clinical experiences, and were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's "Levels of Evidence" guideline (March 2009). The TOIS consensus guideline consists of 10 recommendations in four categories: screening and diagnosis, treatment, complications, and monitoring, covering a total of 27 items. These recommendations received over 75% agreement from the panelists. Early diagnosis and a coordinated referral system between ophthalmologists and pediatric rheumatologists are crucial to prevent irreversible visual impairment in children with JIAU. However, achieving a balance between disease activity and medication use remains a key challenge in JIAU management, necessitating further clinical studies.

A rare case of coronary artery complication in a child with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and macrophage activation syndrome: case report and literature review

A rare case of coronary artery involvement in a child with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) complicated by Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) is reported. The patient initially received an inaccurate diagnosis of Kawasaki Disease, sepsis, and mycoplasma infection and showed no improvement after Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) treatment. Upon admission, symptoms included diffuse red rash, swelling of the limbs, lymph node enlargement, and hepatosplenomegaly. Post investigations, a diagnosis of sJIA and MAS was confirmed, and treatment involved a combination of hormones (methylprednisolone) and immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate). The revealed widened coronary artery diameter was managed with a disease-specific treatment plan and prophylactic plus low-dose aspirin anti-coagulation therapy. Under this management, MAS was well controlled, and follow-ups showed normalization of the child's coronary artery structure and function. This case and the associated literature review underscore the importance of early recognition, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term monitoring for children presenting with sJIA and MAS complicated by coronary artery involvement.

Update on the systemic management of noninfectious uveitis in children and adolescents

Noninfectious uveitis (NIU) in children and adolescents is a rare but treatable cause of visual impairment in children. Treatments for pediatric NIU and their side effects, along with the risks of vision loss and the need for long-term disease monitoring, pose significant challenges for young patients and their families. Treatment includes local and systemic approaches and this review will focus on systemic therapies that encompass corticosteroids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD), and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD). Treatment is generally planned in a stepwise approach. Methotrexate is well-established as the preferential csDMARD in pediatric NIU. Adalimumab, an antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent, is the only bDMARD formally approved for pediatric NIU and has a good safety and efficacy profile. Biosimilars are gaining increasing visibility in the treatment of pediatric NIU. Other bDMARD with some evidence in literature for the treatment of pediatric NIU include infliximab, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab and, more recently, Janus kinase inhibitors. Important aspects of managing children on these systemic therapies include vaccination issues, risk of infection, and psychological distress. Also, strategies need to address regarding primary nonresponse/secondary loss of response to anti-TNF treatment, biological switching, and monitoring regimens for these drugs. Optimal management of pediatric uveitis involves a multidisciplinary team, including specialist pediatric uveitis and rheumatology nurses, pediatric rheumatologists, psychological support, orthoptic and optometry support, and play specialists.

Inflammatory cytokines as mediators of retinal endothelial barrier dysfunction in non-infectious uveitis

Characterised by intraocular inflammation, non-infectious uveitis includes a large group of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases that either involve the eye alone or have both ocular and systemic manifestations. When non-infectious uveitis involves the posterior segment of the eye, specifically the retina, there is substantial risk of vision loss, often linked to breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier. This barrier is formed by non-fenestrated retinal vascular endothelial cells, reinforced by supporting cells that include pericytes, Müller cells and astrocytes. Across the published literature, a group of inflammatory cytokines stand out as prominent mediators of intraocular inflammation, with effects on the retinal endothelium that may contribute to breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier, namely tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17 and chemokine C-C motif ligand (CCL)2. This article reviews the function of each cytokine and discusses the evidence for their involvement in retinal endothelial barrier dysfunction in non-infectious uveitis, including basic laboratory investigations, studies of ocular fluids collected from patients with non-infectious uveitis, and results of clinical treatment trials. The review also outlines gaps in knowledge in this area. Understanding the disease processes at a molecular level can suggest treatment alternatives that are directed against appropriate biological targets to protect the posterior segment of eye and preserve vision in non-infectious uveitis.

Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis

AIM

To describe the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) in a cohort of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients with refractory uveitis.

METHODS

Retrospective observational monocentric study including patients with JIA-associated uveitis treated with SC-TCZ.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled. The rate of uveitis flare/year per each patient was 1.6 ± 2.0 on the last bDMARDs before SC-TCZ, while it decreased to 0.4 ± 0.7 on SC-TCZ. Nine out of thirteen patients (69%) required the introduction of SC-TCZ only for active uveitis at baseline. Among these patients, five (56%) achieved complete treatment response. No uveitis relapses were observed in patients (4/13, 31%) requiring the introduction of SC-TCZ for active arthritis during follow-up (30.48 ± 21.6 months). Overall, SC-TCZ was safe, and no side effects were observed during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

SC-TCZ can be effective and safe in patients with JIA and uveitis recalcitrant to several bDMARDs.

Shaping the Future of Behçet's Uveitis Management: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Challenges, and Prospects of Biologic Therapies

Behçet's uveitis (BU), a vision-threatening manifestation of Behçet's disease, poses substantial management challenges due to its chronic, relapsing nature and potential for vision loss. This review explores the role of biologic therapies in the treatment of BU, providing a comprehensive overview of their effectiveness, drawbacks, and future possibilities. Traditionally, management has relied heavily on corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants. However, their long-term use is frequently associated with systemic side effects and insufficient control of ocular inflammation. Biologic therapies, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors like infliximab and adalimumab, have emerged as effective alternatives, offering better disease control and a more favorable safety profile. We critically evaluated these agents, noting their clinical efficacy in reducing inflammatory flares and preserving visual acuity. Despite their benefits, several issues remain. Accessibility, cost, and lack of long-term safety data limit their widespread use. Additionally, individual variability in treatment response necessitates personalized therapeutic strategies. Recent research has shown promise in addressing these challenges, with the emergence of novel biologic agents and personalized medicine approaches. In summary, biologic therapies represent a paradigm shift in BU management, contributing to better patient outcomes. Yet, there are significant challenges to be overcome. As we move forward, continued research, development of novel biologic agents, and a precision medicine approach will shape the future landscape of BU treatment.

Non-infectious uveitis referred for pediatric rheumatologic assessment and management: a Portuguese retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric uveitis poses challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic presentations and high rates of intraocular complications.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize clinical manifestations and treatment approaches of pediatric uveitis patients in a northern Portuguese tertiary hospital.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective study was conducted involving forty-one patients diagnosed with uveitis between 2006 and 2021. All individuals identified by the Opthalmology department were referred to Pediatric Rheumatology outpatient clinic. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and intraocular complications data were collected.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 78% had anterior uveitis, 17% had panuveitis, and 5% had intermediate uveitis. Uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis was the most common cause (43.9%), predominantly in the oligoarticular, anti-nuclear antibody-positive subgroup. Complications were identified in 80.5% of the patients. Uveitis associated with JIA was diagnosed earlier (5,0 years (3,0-10,5) vs. 9,0 years (5,5-14,0), p=0,036), more frequently in asymptomatic patients (71% vs. 23%, p=0,010), had a more insidious installation (71% vs. 17%, p=0,004), and required more TNF inhibitor treatment (70% vs. 39%, p=0,027).

CONCLUSION

The high rates of intraocular complications and systemic pathology association highlight the need for a combined approach of ophthalmology and pediatric rheumatology in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric uveitis.

Six-month outcomes of infliximab and tocilizumab therapy in non-infectious retinal vasculitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX, 5-10 mg/kg) (Group 1) and tocilizumab (TCZ, 4-8 mg/kg) (Group 2) infusions in non-infectious retinal vasculitis (RV) using Angiographic Scoring for the Uveitis Working Group fluorescein angiography (FA) scoring system.

METHODS

Records of 14 patients (24 eyes) in Group 1 and 8 patients (11 eyes) in Group 2 were retrospectively evaluated to assess visual acuity (VA), anterior chamber cell and flare, vitreous haze, central subfield thickness (CST), and FA scoring at baseline and 6 months of follow-up. The measurements were employed to grade in each group.

RESULTS

In Group 1 and 2, respectively, there was no underlying disease in 9 (60%) and 3 (42.9%) patients. Three (42.9%) patients in Group 2 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) as the most common identified cause. Mean improvement in VA (log MAR) and CST were 0.04 ± 0.14 and 40.3 ± 78.5 µm in Group 1; 0.04 ± 0.09 and 47.3 ± 82.3 µm in Group 2, respectively. Mean FA scores were significantly reduced from 12.4 ± 5.2 and 11.6 ± 4.4 at baseline to 6.4 ± 5.0 and 5.8 ± 3.9 at 6-month in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In Group 2, 9 eyes of 6 patients (75%) had the history of IFX use prior to TCZ initiation. There was no significant safety concern requiring treatment discontinuation during the follow-up in either group.

CONCLUSION

IFX and TCZ infusions showed statistically significant improvement of non-infectious RV as shown by ASUWOG FA Scoring System. TCZ, as well as IFX, appeared to be effective treatment options for non-infectious RV.

Pathogenesis and current therapies for non-infectious uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is a disorder with various etiologies and is characterized by eye inflammation, mainly affecting people of working age. An accurate diagnosis of NIU is crucial for appropriate therapy. The aim of therapy is to improve vision, relieve ocular inflammation, prevent relapse, and avoid treatment side effects. At present, corticosteroids are the mainstay of topical or systemic therapy. However, repeated injections are required for the treatment of chronic NIU. Recently, new drug delivery systems that may ensure intraocular delivery of therapeutic drug levels have been highlighted. Furthermore, with the development of immunosuppressants and biologics, specific therapies can be selected based on the needs of each patient. Immunosuppressants used in the treatment of NIU include calcineurin inhibitors and antimetabolites. However, systemic immunosuppressive therapy itself is associated with adverse effects due to the inhibition of immune function. In patients with refractory NIU or those who cannot tolerate corticosteroids and immunosuppressors, biologics have emerged as alternative treatments. Thus, to improve the prognosis of patients with NIU, NIU should be managed with different drugs according to the response to treatment and possible side effects.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its associated uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatologic disease in children. Uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation of JIA, and it can be a sight-threatening condition.

AREAS COVERED

In this review article, we discussed epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, supportive laboratory tests, treatment options, and complications of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis. We covered conventional immunomodulatory therapy and biologic response modifiers agents for different types of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their associated uveitis. Finally, we discussed the course of disease, functional outcome, and the quality of life of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Although clinical outcomes of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its associated uveitis have been improved over the past three decades by biologic response modifier agents, a significant proportion of patients require active treatment into adult life therefore screening and monitoring of these patients is required during the patient's entire life. The limited number of food and drug administration approved biologic response modifier agents for the treatment of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis justify more randomized clinical trials with new medications in this field.

Challenges and management of childhood non-infectious chronic uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Childhood uveitis is a sight-threatening condition, because if not properly recognized and treated can lead to several ocular complications and blindness. It represents a real challenge not only from an etiologic/diagnostic point of view, but also for management and therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we will discuss the main etiologies, the diagnostic approach, risk factors associated to childhood non-infectious uveitis (cNIU), and the difficulties in eye examination in childhood. Moreover, we will discuss the treatment of cNIU in term of therapeutic choice, timing of initiation and withdrawal.

EXPERT OPINION

Identification of specific diagnosis is mandatory to prevent severe complications, thus a thorough differential diagnosis is essential. Pediatric eye examination may be extremely challenging due to the scarce collaboration, but novel techniques and biomarkers will help in identify low grade of inflammation, eventually modify long-term outcomes. Once identified the appropriate diagnosis, recognition of children who may benefit of a systemic treatment is crucial. What, When and how long are the key questions to address in this field. Current evidence and future results of ongoing clinical trials will help in driving treatment. A proper ocular screening, not only in the context of systemic disease, should be discussed by experts.

Non-anti TNFα biologic agents for non-infectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Non-infectious uveitis related to systemic inflammatory diseases represents a leading cause of blindness. Anti-TNFα agents are the first-line biologic therapy after traditional immunosuppressants, both for the control of ocular and systemic involvement. However, a subgroup of patients fails anti-TNFα agents, due to primary inefficacy, loss of efficacy or adverse events.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the efficacy and safety of non-anti-TNFα biologics in adult patients with non-infectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. The systematic review of PubMed and Embase yielded 3663 records, from which 16 studies were included (13 non-controlled, 3 controlled trials). Most studies focused on Behçet's syndrome (BS) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and assessed the efficacy of tocilizumab (n=11), rituximab (n=3), secukinumab (n=1), or anakinra/canakinumab (n=1). A body of evidence supports the use of tocilizumab BS and JIA-associated uveitis, for improving visual acuity, reducing central macular thickness, inducing ocular remission, and sparing corticosteroids. Preliminary data suggest that rituximab may represent a valid alternative, particularly in JIA, while anakinra/canakinumab might play a role in BS-associated uveitis. Conversely, the role of secukinumab appears limited.

EXPERT OPINION

Current evidence encourages further investigations on the efficacy and safety of non-anti-TNFα agents in non-infectious non-idiopathic uveitis.

Comparing biologic options for the management of Behcet's disease-related uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Behçet's disease (BD) associated uveitis occurs in approximately 50-70% of the patients. Ocular involvement in BD may induce a severe affection of visual function, leading to a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. The risk for severe visual loss increases when the ocular posterior segment is involved and in patients with no adequate treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Monoclonal tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biotechnological inhibitors represent a relatively recent milestone for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis (NIU) also in BD patients. In addition to TNF inhibitors, further biologic agents have been increasingly proposed for multi-recalcitrant cases, as for interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 inhibitors. However, evidence on these new opportunities requires to be widened in the next future.

EXPERT OPINION

Joining the forces for scientific efforts is essential to quickly obtain solid acquisitions useful for the everyday clinical practice. To this end, the Auto-Inflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) Network has recently supported the development of an international registry dedicated to NIU and other inflammatory ocular involvement observed in BD patients. This will be essential to resolve current and future unmet needs burdening the everyday clinical practice.

Interleukin-6 and Macular Edema: A Review of Outcomes with Inhibition

This paper describes the current literature on the molecular pathophysiology of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the genesis of macular edema and on the outcomes with IL-6 inhibitors in the treatment of non-infectious macular edema. The role of IL-6 in the development of macular edema has been well elucidated. IL-6 is produced by multiple cells of the innate immune system and leads to a higher likelihood of developing autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as non-infectious uveitis, through a variety of mechanisms. These include increasing the helper T-cell population over the regulatory T-cell population and leading to the increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha. In addition to being key in the generation of uveitis and subsequent macular edema through these inflammatory pathways, IL-6 also can lead to the development of macular edema through other pathways. IL-6 induces the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and facilitates vascular leakage by downregulating tight junction proteins in retinal endothelial cells. Clinically, the use of IL-6 inhibitors has been found to be efficacious primarily in the context of treatment-resistant non-infectious uveitis and secondary macular edema. IL-6 is a key cytokine in retinal inflammation and macular edema. It is thus not surprising that the use of IL-6 inhibitors in treatment-resistant macular edema in the setting of non-infectious uveitis has been well documented as an effective treatment option. The use of IL-6 inhibitors in macular edema secondary to non-uveitic processes has only begun to be explored.

Perspectives of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biological Agents in Non-Infectious Uveitis Treatment: A Review

Biological drugs, especially those targeting anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) molecule, have revolutionized the treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU), a sight-threatening condition characterized by ocular inflammation that can lead to severe vision threatening and blindness. Adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), the most widely used anti-TNFα drugs, have led to greater clinical benefits, but a significant fraction of patients with NIU do not respond to these drugs. The therapeutic outcome is closely related to systemic drug levels, which are influenced by several factors such as immunogenicity, concomitant treatment with immunomodulators, and genetic factors. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug and anti-drug antibody (ADAbs) levels is emerging as a resource to optimise biologic therapy by personalising treatment to bring and maintain drug concentration within the therapeutic range, especially in those patients where a clinical response is less than expected. Furthermore, some studies have described different genetic polymorphisms that may act as predictors of response to treatment with anti-TNFα agents in immune-mediated diseases and could be useful in personalising biologic treatment selection. This review is a compilation of the published evidence in NIU and in other immune-mediated diseases that support the usefulness of TDM and pharmacogenetics as a tool to guide clinicians’ treatment decisions leading to better clinical outcomes. In addition, findings from preclinical and clinical studies, assessing the safety and efficacy of intravitreal administration of anti-TNFα agents in NIU are discussed.

Tocilizumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis, a Narrative Review

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated uveitis (JIA-U) is the most common extra-articular manifestation of JIA, affecting 10–15% of patients, especially in oligoarticular JIA where its course may be faint. Therefore, JIA-U is one of the most challenging pediatric uveitis, associated with major ocular morbidity and possibly leading to irreversible structural ocular damage and to vision-threatening complications. Adequate management is crucial for avoiding visual impairment complications. Since the introduction of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDS), the visual prognosis of JIA-U has dramatically improved over the decades. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blockers are the most used bDMARDs in treating JIA-U with large evidence of efficacy. However, inadequate response to these agents, either due to intolerance or inefficacy, may be observed, requiring a swap to other classes of immunosuppressive agents, including anti-IL-6, anti-CD20, and, more recently, JAK inhibitors. Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to the interelukin-6 receptor preventing IL-6 from binding to its soluble and membrane-bound receptors. A growing body of literature provides promising results about the efficacy of intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of JIA-U. A narrative review of the literature on this topic will improve our knowledge on the potential use of tocilizumab in JIA-U.

Therapeutic Response After Immunosuppressive Drug Prescription in Non-infectious Uveitis: A Survival Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To identify factors affecting the response rate to immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included patients from the Hospital Clinico San Carlos Uveitis Clinic diagnosed with NIU from 1992 to 2016. Subjects were followed up from ISD prescription until the achievement of good therapeutic response (GTR), ISD treatment change, or up to 12 months. GTR was defined as the complete resolution of the eye inflammatory manifestations with a corticosteroid dose ≤ 10 or ≤ 5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (GTR10 and GTR5, respectively) maintained for at least 28 days. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for GTR. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors were analyzed using Cox robust regression.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (100 episodes of ISD prescription) were analyzed. In 44 and 41 episodes, GTR10 and GTR5 were achieved, respectively. A lower hazard for both GTRs was associated with uveitic macular edema at prescription and with a higher "highest oral corticosteroid dose prescribed in the year before ISD prescription". GTR10 was higher if cyclosporine was prescribed (compared to other ISDs), and if a higher number of ISDs had been previously prescribed. GTR5 hazard was lower for patients with posterior uveitis or if the ISDs were prescribed before 2008, and higher if periocular corticosteroids had been administered before ISD prescription, or if the duration of the posterior segment activity was shorter.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with GTR to ISDs may help to identify patients with NIUs who could benefit from a thorough follow-up.

Alternative Biologic Therapy in Children Failing Conventional TNFα Inhibitors for Refractory, Noninfectious, Chronic Anterior Uveitis

PURPOSE

A significant number of children with noninfectious, chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) fail to respond to conventional therapy; however, successful alternative biologic treatments (ABT) have not been well described. This study aims to review the clinical and treatment characteristics of children with CAU who require ABT.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study.

METHODS

Setting: Tertiary center.

STUDY POPULATION

Children with noninfectious CAU.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURES

Clinical characteristics, uveitis course, complications, and treatment were compared among patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, conventional TNFα inhibitors (cTNFi), and ABT for >3 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Success of ABT (abatacept, tocilizumab, and/or golimumab) in children failing conventional treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 52 children with CAU, 75% had juvenile idiopathic arthritis. CAU was controlled in 15 children receiving MTX monotherapy, 28 receiving cTNFi, and 9 receiving ABT (n = 1, abatacept; n = 3, tocilizumab; n = 5, golimumab). Patients in the ABT group had a greater number of total ocular complications per person before ABT than those in the control groups (3.4 vs 0.7 [MTX], P < .001, and 1.5 [cTNFi], P < .001, respectively). In all 9 children on ABT, treatment led to control of CAU and topical glucocorticoids tapered to ≤2 drops/d with no new ocular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, alternative biologics (abatacept, golimumab, and tocilizumab) were useful for treating CAU in children who fail MTX and cTNFi therapy. Patients who were controlled on ABT had more disease activity, ocular complications, and anti-cTNFi neutralizing antibodies (before ABT) than those managed with conventional therapy. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Baricitinib in severe and refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis: a case report and literature review

Ocular disease, such as scleritis and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK), may be a serious ocular complication. We present a patient with severe and refractory PUK treated with baricitinib. A review of the literature on Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKINIB) in refractory ocular surface pathology was also performed. For the literature review, the search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library was carried out from inception until 31 May 2021, including conference proceedings from four major rheumatology congresses. All original research articles studying JAKINIB treatment in patients with inflammatory eye disease were included. We present an 85-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and secondary Sjögren's syndrome refractory to methotrexate, leflunomide, certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and tocilizumab (TCZ). However, 10 months after starting TCZ, the patient suffered a perforation secondary to PUK, requiring urgent surgical intervention. In the absence of infection, she was treated with boluses of intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone at high doses in a decreasing pattern together with baricitinib at a dose of 2 mg/day with a very rapid and persistent favorable response to eye and joint symptoms. After 18 months of treatment, the patient had not presented serious side effects or signs of reactivation of her disease. In addition to this report, three other studies including one PUK associated with RA and two non-infectious scleritis treated with tofacitinib were included in this literature review. All three patients had experienced an insufficient response to conventional treatment, including biologic agents, before being switched to JAKINIB, leading to a complete or partial recovery in all of them without significant adverse effects so far. JAKINIBs (baricitinib and tofacitinib) may be an effective and safe therapy in patients with severe autoimmune and refractory ocular surface pathology, such as scleritis and PUK.

Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. With the gradual expansion of the incidence of JIA in the population, the pathogenesis and treatment of JIA were further explored and analyzed, and JIA has achieved some success in drug therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A systemic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Through the searching of clinical trials of JIA in recent years, we summarized the progress of the clinical treatment of JIA.

RESULTS

The main treatment drugs for JIA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents. So far, a variety of biological agents targeting the cytokines and receptors involved in its pathogenesis have been gradually approved for JIA in many countries. The application of biological agents in JIA showed good efficacy and safety, bringing unprecedented experience to children and adolescents with JIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential and advantages of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA are significant, and the application of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA will be more and more common.

New and Updated Recommendations for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis and Idiopathic Chronic Anterior Uveitis

OBJECTIVE

The Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood identified the need to update the current guidelines, and the objective here was to produce this document to guide clinicians managing children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIAU) and idiopathic chronic anterior uveitis (CAU).

METHODS

The group analyzed the literature published between December 2014 and June 2020 after a systematic literature review conducted by 2 clinicians. Pediatric rheumatologists were paired with ophthalmologists to review the eligible 37 publications. The search criteria were selected to reflect those used for the 2018 Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) recommendations, in order to provide an update, rather than a replacement for that publication. The summary of the current evidence for each SHARE recommendation was presented to the expert committee. These recommendations were then discussed and revised during a video consensus meeting on January 22, 2021, with 14 voting participants, using a nominal group technique to reach consensus.

RESULTS

JIAU treatment was extended to include CAU. Fourteen recommendations regarding treatment of JIAU und CAU with >90% agreement were accepted.

CONCLUSION

An update to the previous 2018 SHARE recommendations for the treatment of children with JIAU with the addition of CAU was created using an evidence-based consensus process. This guideline should help support clinicians to care for children and young people with CAU.

Management Strategies of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Chronic Anterior Uveitis: Current Perspectives

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common extraocular disease associated with pediatric uveitis. Despite the growing knowledge about the pathogenetic and clinical characteristics of the disease, it still remains a challenge for both the pediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist. Since uveitis is asymptomatic in most cases, it is generally detected by parents in a late phase of the disease when complications have occurred with consequent severe vision loss. Improvement in attentive screening and early treatment initiation to suppress inflammation has considerably reduced the sight-threatening outcomes of JIA-associated chronic anterior uveitis (JIA-CAU). Initial treatment with topical steroids is effective in most cases. However, more severe cases require the use of periocular or systemic corticosteroids, possibly leading to long-term complications. These include growth retardation, cataract and glaucoma. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are then employed in patients resistant to first-line therapy or to reduce steroid-associated complications. In this review, we will discuss the immunosuppressant agents currently employed for the treatment of the disease, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α biologics approved or not by the regulatory agencies. We will also highlight how new therapeutic options like biologic targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) co-stimulatory molecule, interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) or B lymphocytes might represent exciting new options for patients resistant to conventional therapy. Finally, the potential use of janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors recently approved for the treatment of several inflammatory rheumatic diseases in adults will be also discussed.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Therapie der Uveitis mit Biologika

Zielsetzung Ziel dieser Zusammenfassung ist das Vermitteln einer Übersicht zu den verschiedenen Ansatzpunkten, Wirkmechanismen und Indikationen diverser Biologika, die bei der Therapie der nichtinfektiösen Uveitis zum Einsatz kommen.

Material und Methoden Etablierte sowie aktuelle Literatur wurden herangezogen, um die biochemischen und pathophysiologischen Grundlagen sowie eine evidenzbasierte Empfehlung zum Therapieeinsatz verschiedener Biologika bei nichtinfektiöser Uveitis allgemein und bei speziellen Uveitisentitäten darzulegen.

Ergebnisse Für viele Biologika, hier nennenswert TNF-α-Inhibitoren, einige Interleukininhibitoren, Interferone sowie B- und T-Zell-Inhibitoren, liegen mittlerweile gute Daten vor, was ihren Einsatz in der Uveitistherapie mehr als rechtfertigt. Dies trifft insbesondere für den TNF-α-Inhibitor Adalimumab zu, welcher der einzig zugelassene Vertreter für diese Indikation unter den vorgestellten Biologika ist.

Schlussfolgerungen Die Biologika haben die Behandlung der Uveitis revolutioniert und sind aus der aktuellen Therapie der intraokularen Entzündung nicht mehr wegzudenken. Biologika werden bei Ineffektivität oder Unverträglichkeit konventioneller immunsuppressiver Medikamente empfohlen, aber auch bei der Therapie von schwerwiegenden Uveitisformen (z. B. Morbus Behçet). Die TNF-α-Inhibitoren sind die am häufigsten verwendeten Biologika bei Uveitis.

Uveitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis - Case Reports on Guideline-based Diagnostic Work-up and Treatment

OBJECTIVES

Case report based presentation of the current German interdisciplinary guideline on the diagnosis and management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated (JIA) uveitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Guideline of the German Society of Ophthalmology, the Society of Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, the German Society of Rheumatology, the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists, with the participation of patient representatives. Recent primary publications were critically graduated for evidence and recommendations; the methodology included consensus building through Delphi rounds and external peer review. The outcomes are presented with typical case studies.

OUTCOMES

Once JIA is first diagnosed, periodic ophthalmological check-ups should promptly be instituted ensuring that uveitis is diagnosed before irreversible sequelae become manifest. High-quality patient care can be provided depending on the severity of each uveitis case. At present, anti-inflammatory treatment relies on corticosteroids, conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b) and other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

CONCLUSIONS

Timely diagnosis and state-of-the-art guideline-based management can significantly improve the long-term outcome of JIA-associated uveitis.

Tocilizumab and Abatacept for the Treatment of Childhood Chronic Uveitis: A Monocentric Comparison Experience

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Tocilizumab and Abatacept for treating Childhood Chronic non-infectious Uveitis (CCU), resistant to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective charts review study (January 2010-April 2021) recruiting CCU, refractory to anti-TNF. To be included, children should have active uveitis at the time of Tocilizumab (8 mg/kg, every 4 weeks) or Abatacept (10 mg/kg, every 4 weeks). The main outcome was the achievement of ocular remission on treatment defined as the absence of flares for ≥ 6 months.

RESULTS

In this study, 18 patients with CCU (14 F), previously treated with Methotrexate and Adalimumab, were enrolled: 15 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (83.3%), 2 idiopathic (11.1%), and 1 Behçet (5.6%). Furthermore, ten patients received Abatacept and 8 patients received Tocilizumab. The mean duration of treatment on Abatacept was 31.6 months (SD ± 30.8), on Tocilizumab 25.25 months (SD ± 17.8). In total, 13 children (72.2%) achieved remission, with a better remission rate for the Tocilizumab group (8/8) compared to the Abatacept group (5/10) (χ² 5.53, p = 0.019). No difference was evaluated between the two groups in the proportion of patients who showed flares during the treatment (2/6 Abatacept vs. 1/8 Tocilizumab). A significant difference was evaluated in the proportion of patients who flared after treatment discontinuation: 3/3 Abatacept vs. 0/3 Tocilizumab (χ² 3.8, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Even though this is a monocentric retrospective study, in a relatively small group, our study suggests a superior efficacy of Tocilizumab over Abatacept for treating anti-TNF refractory CCU.

[New possibilities in therapy of ocular inflammation in rheumatic diseases]

This review is devoted to the potential application of genetically engineered biological drugs of different classes in the treatment of main forms of uveitis and other types of non-infectious ocular inflammation in immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. The article presents the results of studies demonstrating the influence of interleukin-17 inhibitor secukinumab on the course of uveitis in spondylarthritis, shows the possibilities of treating uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis with inhibitors of interleukin-6, co-stimulation of T-lymphocytes. Inhibition of interleukin-1 is considered an effective method of influencing the ocular inflammation in monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes and Behcet's disease. Rituximab is considered as an option for immunosuppressive therapy of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Methods

Review of literature through December 2020.

Results

Individual data was available for 229 patients with refractory non-infectious uveitis (n = 108) or scleritis (n = 121) who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (uveitis: 67/90, 74.4%; scleritis: 90/96, 93.8%) at a mean of 33.5 months following the diagnosis of uveitis (range = 0 to 168.0 months; median = 24.0 months) and 39.4 months after diagnosis of scleritis (range = 1.0 to 168.0 months; median = 21.0 months). Patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (uveitis: 18/90, 20%; scleritis: 4/94, 4.3%), or with one (uveitis: 19/90, 21.1%; scleritis: 30/94, 31.9%), two (uveitis: 11/90, 12.2%; scleritis 27/94, 28.7%), or three or more (uveitis: 37/90, 41.1%; scleritis: 31/94, 33.0%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (uveitis: 45/87, 51.7%; scleritis: 87/114, 76.3%), followed by the Foster protocol (eight weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 18/87, 20.7%; scleritis: 10/114, 8.8%), and the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 5/87, 5.7%; scleritis: 6/114, 5.3%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (uveitis: 19/87, 21.8%; scleritis 11/114, 9.6%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with non-infectious uveitis (81/97, 83.5%). Commonly treated uveitic diagnoses included non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (30/107, 28.0%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (21/107, 19.6%), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (12/107, 11.2%), and Behçet disease (11/107, 10.3%). Cases of non-infectious scleritis were most commonly attributed to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (75/121, 62.0%) and rheumatoid arthritis (15/121, 12.4%), and showed an even greater rate of positive therapeutic response (112/120, 93.3%) following RTX treatment. No side effects were reported in 76.3% (74/97) of uveitis and 85.5% (71/83) scleritis cases. Of those cases associated with RTX-induced adverse events, the most common were infusion reactions of various severity (11/35, 31.4%).

Conclusions

Overall, RTX appeared to be both effective and well-tolerated as second or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Perspectives for immunotherapy in noninfectious immune mediated uveitis

Introduction: Noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In adult patients, anterior NIU is usually managed with topical corticosteroids. In intermediate, posterior uveitis. and panuveitis, systemic corticosteroids are used especially in case of bilaterality or association with systemic disease. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or intolerance to corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Anti-TNF-α agents are by far the most widely used biotherapies. In case of failure or poor tolerance to anti-TNF-α, new targeted therapies can be proposed.Areas covered: We present and discuss an updated overview on biologics and biotherapies in NIU.Expert opinion: In case of dependency to systemic or intravitreal steroids, sight-threatening disease, and/or failure of conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF-α are used as first-line biologics to achieve quiescence of inflammation. Anti-interleukin-6 is another option that may be proposed as first-line biologic or in case of poor efficacy of anti-TNF-α. Interferon can be directly proposed in specific indications (e.g. refractory macular edema, sight-threatening Behçet's uveitis). In the rare cases that remain unresponsive to traditional biotherapies, novel molecules, such as Janus-associated-kinase and anti-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors can be used. Therapeutic response must always be evaluated by clinical and appropriate ancillary investigations.

Update on biologic therapies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease of childhood, and juvenile idiopathic associated uveitis (JIA-U) is the most frequently noted extra-articular manifestation. JIA-U can present asymptomatically and lead to ocular complications, so regular screening and monitoring are needed to prevent potentially sight-threatening sequelae. Topical glucocorticoids such as prednisolone acetate are usually the first line of treatment for anterior uveitis associated with JIA-U, but long-term use may be associated with cataract, ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate allow tapering of the corticosteroids to prevent long-term complications. Biologic therapies have been increasingly used as targeted therapies for JIA-U, particularly monoclonal antibodies targeting the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α such as adalimumab and infliximab. One recent, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial provided evidence of the efficacy of adalimumab with methotrexate for JIA-U compared to methotrexate alone. Another clinical trial studying the interleukin-6 inhibitor tocilizumab for JIA-U showed promise in tapering topical corticosteroids. Additionally, JAK inhibitors are emerging biologic therapies for JIA-U in patients refractory to TNF-α inhibitors, with a clinical trial assessing the efficacy of baricitinib for JIA-U underway. While clinical trials on these novel biologics are limited, further investigation of these agents may provide additional therapeutic options for JIA-U.

A Review of the Various Roles and Participation Levels of B-Cells in Non-Infectious Uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis is an inflammatory disorder of the eye that accounts for severe visual loss without evident infectious agents. While T cells are supposed to dominate the induction of inflammation in non-infectious uveitis, the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of this disease is obscure. Therefore, this review aimed to discuss diverse B-cell participation in different non-infectious uveitides and their roles in the pathogenesis of this disease as well as the mechanism of action of rituximab. Increasing evidence from experimental models and human non-infectious uveitis has suggested the participation of B cells in non-infectious uveitis. The participation levels vary in different uveitides. Furthermore, B cells play multiple roles in the pathogenic mechanisms. B cells produce autoantibodies, regulate T cell responses via antibody-independent functions, and constitute ectopic lymphoid structures. Regulatory B cells perform pivotal anti-inflammatory functions in non-infectious uveitis. Rituximab may work by depleting pro-inflammatory B cells and restoring the quantity and function of regulatory B cells in this disease. Identifying the levels of B-cell participation and the associated roles is beneficial for optimizing therapy. Diversified experimental model choices and emerging tools and/or methods are conducive for future studies on this topic.

Advancing the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis has undergone substantial changes in recent decades. These changes are partly due to the availability of new treatments, mainly biological agents, as well as developments in treatment strategies, including a focus on concepts such as treat-to-target. In addition, the creation of large paediatric research networks has improved patient access to, and design of, clinical trials for rare paediatric diseases. Although these advances have resulted in improvements in care for most patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, certain subgroups of patients continue to have a poor prognosis. Further research aims to identify patients in these subgroups early, to personalise their care, improve functional outcomes, and minimise long-term damage and harm. Optimising the duration of therapy for those individuals who require systemic immunosuppression is also of importance. Incorporation of novel biomarkers in combination with validated clinical measures in an effort to predict outcomes and target therapy accordingly is an exciting development.

Update on noninfectious uveitis in children and its treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of recently published articles covering risk factors, novel biomarkers and treatment for noninfectious uveitis in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last few years, several genetic markers, serum biomarkers, aqueous humor markers, tear biomarkers and clinical factors have been identified, which are associated with childhood noninfectious uveitis. We describe the most important reports in this field that may help to tailor the screening and monitoring of this population in the future and might become the target of novel therapies. The advances in the biologic therapy of paediatric uveitis, thanks to evidence provided by the SYCAMORE, ADJUVITE and APTITUDE trials, offer new possibilities for the treatment of patients who fail methotrexate with adalimumab and tocilizumab. We discuss the importance of comprehensive outcome measures as proposed by the Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood (MIWGUC).

SUMMARY

Paediatric noninfectious uveitis is a sight-threatening condition and the identification of risk factors and novel biomarkers is critical for tailored management. Biologic therapies are revolutionizing the outcomes of patients resistant to conventional therapy. Increasing our knowledge of disease pathogenesis is crucial to improve targeting of screening to those at highest risk and stratification of treatments.

Cytokines that Modulate the Differentiation of Th17 Cells in Autoimmune Uveitis

Increasing evidence has suggested that T helper 17 (Th17) cells play a central role in the pathogenesis of ocular immune disease. The association between pathogenic Th17 cells and the development of uveitis has been confirmed in experimental and clinical studies. Several cytokines affect the initiation and stabilization of the differentiation of Th17 cells. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of related cytokines in the differentiation of Th17 cells is important for exploring the pathogenesis and the potential therapeutic targets of uveitis. This article briefly describes the structures, mechanisms, and targeted drugs of cytokines-including interleukin (IL)-6, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), IL-1β, IL-23, IL-27, IL-35, IL-2, IL-4, IL-21, and interferon (IFN)-γ-which have an important influence on the differentiation of Th17 cells and discusses their potential as therapeutic targets for treating autoimmune uveitis.

Recent advances in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis has an estimated prevalence of 10-20% in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, making it the most common cause of chronic anterior uveitis in children. Prompt treatment is important to prevent development of ocular complications and permanent vision loss. In this review, we will discuss the use of immunosuppression in treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. This will include the use of conventional immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate, biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, such as adalimumab, as well as other anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, including infliximab and golimumab. In addition, we will discuss medications currently in clinical trials or under consideration for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis, including interleukin-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab) and Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib).

Uveitis for the non-ophthalmologist

The uveitides are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by inflammation inside the eye. The uveitides are classified as infectious or non-infectious. The non-infectious uveitides, which are presumed to be immune mediated, can be further divided into those that are associated with a known systemic disease and those that are eye limited,-ie, not associated with a systemic disease. The ophthalmologist identifies the specific uveitic entity by medical history, clinical examination, and ocular imaging, as well as supplemental laboratory testing, if indicated. Treatment of the infectious uveitides is tailored to the particular infectious organism and may include regional and/or systemic medication. First line treatment for non-infectious uveitides is corticosteroids that can be administered topically, as regional injections or surgical implants, or systemically. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy is used in patients with severe disease who cannot tolerate corticosteroids, require chronic corticosteroids at >7.5 mg/day prednisone, or in whom the disease is known to respond better to immunosuppression. Management of many of these diseases is optimized by coordination between the ophthalmologist and rheumatologist or internist.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

[Immunosuppressive therapy in severe or chronic pediatric uveitis: Review of the literature]

Immunosuppressants are prescribed for pediatric uveitis in cases of severe involvement affecting the prognosis for vision or life, in cases of recurrent or chronic uveitis to achieve corticosteroid sparing, or in cases of corticosteroid resistance. Immunosuppressants used in children include antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and biologics, including infliximab, adalimumab, anakinra, canakinumab, and tocilizumab. The mechanisms of action and indications of the various immunosuppressants are described in this review.

Long Term Experience in Patients With JIA-Associated Uveitis in a Large Referral Center

Objectives: To describe demographic, clinical and therapeutic findings of a large cohort of patients with JIA-associated uveitis in a nationwide referral pediatric rheumatology and uveitis center in Northern Italy. Methods: Retrospective study of 125 patients with JIA-associated uveitis followed from 2009 to 2019. Demographic and rheumatologic features including JIA ILAR classification, age at onset, and laboratory data were recorded. Ocular findings collected were: anatomic location of uveitis, laterality, type, recurrence rate, visual acuity, ocular complications, and local therapy. Systemic therapy with conventional and biologic immunosuppressants, occurrence of adverse events, and duration of treatments were recorded. Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients with JIA-associated uveitis were followed for a meantime of 9.2 (±1.7) years. Oligoarticular JIA was present in 92.8% of patients and anterior uveitis in 96%. The most common ocular complications recorded in our sample were posterior synechiae (37.6%), cataract (20.8%), band keratopathy (19.2%), glaucoma (7.2%), and macular edema (5.6%). Conventional immunosuppressants were used in 75.2% of patients with a mean duration of 9.1 years (±5.4), while biologics were administered in 47.2% of them for a period of 5.4 years. Adverse events (AE) were seen in 23% of patients being treated with Methotrexate, in 10.4% of patients treated with Adalimumab, in 38.5% of patients in therapy with Infliximab, and in 14.3% of patients being treated with Tocilizumab. No AE were reported in patients treated with Golimumab, Certolizumab, Abatacept and Rituximab. Conclusions: An aggressive treatment approach for patients with JIA-associated uveitis ensured a low number of ocular complications with a good safety profile.

Biotherapies in Uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) represents one of the leading causes of blindness in developed countries. The therapeutic strategy aims to rapidly control intra-ocular inflammation, prevent irremediable ocular damage, allow corticosteroid sparing and save the vision, and has evolved over the last few years. Anterior NIU is mostly managed with topical treatment in adults. However, for intermediate, posterior and pan-uveitis, notably when both eyes are involved, systemic treatment is usually warranted. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or non-tolerance of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in non-anterior NIU. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents are by far the most widely used, especially adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). In case of sight-threatening uveitis in Behçet's disease or in case of risk of severe recurrences, respectively IFX and ADA may be recommended as first-line therapy. Many questions are left unanswered; how long to treat NIU, how to discontinue anti-TNF-α agents, what biologic to use in case of anti-TNF-α failure? The objective of this review is to present an updated overview of knowledge on the use of biological treatments in NIU.