Comparative pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after subcutaneous administration of recombinant human erythropoietin formulated with different stabilizers

Erythropoietin Administration for Anemia Due to Chronic Kidney Disease - Subcutaneous OR Intravenous, What Do We Know So Far?

The prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is almost twice that of the normal population and its severity increases exponentially as the disease worsens, dramatically affecting the quality of an individual’s life. The advent of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) in the 1980s saw a revolutionary change in the treatment of anemia in CKD patients, drastically improving quality of life (QoL), overall health and reducing the need for blood transfusions. Numerous ESAs have been developed ever since and are in current use, with the primary routes of administration being intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) injections. Their use, however, has stirred significant controversy over the last two decades. Additionally, despite numerous studies and trials, the latest international recommendations for their use do not provide clear cut guidance with well-grounded evidence on the recommended route of administration for different sets of patients. Instead, this decision has mainly been left up to the physician’s discretion, whilst keeping certain key factors in mind. This review shall summarize, discuss and compare the findings of previous studies on various factors governing the two aforementioned routes of administration and identify areas that need further exploration.

The safety of switching between therapeutic proteins

INTRODUCTION

The approval of several biosimilars in the past years has prompted discussion on potential safety risks associated with switching to and from these products. It has been suggested that switching may lead to safety concerns. However, data is limited on the clinical effects of switching.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we provide an overview of data related to switching between human recombinant growth hormones, erythropoietins and granulocyte colony stimulating agents. We reviewed data from clinical trials, pharmacovigilance databases and an overview of the literature on the frequency of switching between these products. The review covers both switching between innovator products within the same product class and switching to and from biosimilars.

EXPERT OPINION

Data on the frequency of switching in clinical practice is scarce, but it seems most frequent for erythropoietins. We have found no evidence from clinical trial data or post marketing surveillance data that switching to and from different biopharmaceuticals leads to safety concerns.

Development and validation of RP-HPLC and RP-UPLC methods for quantification of erythropoietin formulated with human serum albumin

Rapid and sensitive reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP–HPLC) and ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) methods with UV detection for quantification of erythropoietin (EPO) in presence of human serum albumin (HSA) as a stabilizer in a pharmaceutical formulation of EPO have been developed and validated. Chromatography was performed with mobile phase containing 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in MilliQ water and 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile with gradient program and a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min for HPLC and 0.35 mL/min for UPLC. Quantification was accomplished with internal reference standard (qualified using EP reference standard). The methods were validated for linearity (correlation coefficient=0.99), accuracy, precision and robustness. Robustness was confirmed by considering three factors; percentages of TFA in mobile phase, age of test sample and mobile phase and column temperature. Intermediate precision was confirmed by different analysts, different equipments and on different days. The relative standard deviation (RSD) value (<2%, n=30) indicated good precision of the developed method. The proposed RP-HPLC method had retention time less than 20 min while the developed UPLC method had retention time less than 4 min. Both the RP-HPLC and UPLC methods were simple, highly sensitive, precise and accurate, suggesting that the developed methods are useful for routine quality control.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of one US-marketed and two European-marketed epoetin alfas: a randomized prospective study

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence and potency of registered epoetin alfa products that have not been compared before in a randomized controlled clinical study.

Methods: The study was conducted in two parts: part A compared the European-marketed HX575 and the US-marketed Epogen®; part B compared the European-marketed Erypo®/Eprex® and HX575 manufactured at two different drug substance production sites (HX575-TT denoting the already-approved technology-transfer product from an additional manufacturing site). In analyses across both study parts, Epogen® was exploratorily compared with Erypo®/Eprex®.

A dense-sampling 48-hour pharmacokinetic profile was recorded at steady state after 11 doses of 100 IU epoetin alfa per kg of bodyweight. The hemoglobin response over 4 weeks of study medication administration was analyzed as the primary efficacy surrogate parameter using an ANCOVA model with the baseline value as co-variate.

The per-protocol population comprised a total of 268 subjects, 76 in part A (equally randomized to HX575 or Epogen®) and 192 in part B (equally randomized to HX575, HX575-TT, or Erypo®/Eprex®). Pairs of study arms were compared in terms of the ratio of the mean epoetin alfa area under the curve (AUC) and the ratio of the mean hemoglobin area under the effect curve (AUEC).

Results: Bioequivalence was shown in all pair-wise comparisons with the 90% confidence intervals of the AUC ratios falling within the standard bioequivalence limits of 80–125%. Moreover, an equivalent pharmacodynamic response was achieved with all compared epoetin alfa products, as confirmed by the hemoglobin AUEC ratio’s 90% CI falling within the predefined acceptance margins of 96.8–103.2%. Thus, bioequivalence and equivalent potency was demonstrated for HX575 and Epogen® in part A of the study, as well as for HX575, HX575-TT and Erypo®/Eprex® in part B of the study. Pair-wise comparison across study parts indicated similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of Epogen® and Erypo®/Eprex®.

All compared epoetin alfa products were well tolerated and had a similar safety profile. No subject developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies upon administration of study medication.

Conclusion: The results show, for the first time in a prospective randomized clinical study, equivalent bioavailability at steady state and similar potency of the US-marketed Epogen® and the European-marketed Binocrit®. Differences in the formulation between the epoetin alfa products had no apparent clinical impact. The high degree of similarity between Epogen® and Erypo®/ Eprex® provides justification for linking and comparing results from clinical studies that were conducted using either US- or European-marketed epoetin alfa products.

Hypersensitivity reactions to the polysorbate contained in recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoietin (Case Report)

The following case reports are of two patients who have developed hypersensitivity reactions to the red cell growth hormones, darbepoietin and erythropoietin. The subsequent skin testing and clinical course suggested that the cause of these reactions was due to the excipient polysorbate 80. This finding might have implications in the recent increase in the incidence of pure red cell aplasia.

Comparison of two recombinant erythropoietin formulations in patients with anemia due to end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: a parallel, randomized, double blind study

Background

Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) is used for the treatment of last stage renal anemia. A new EPO preparation was obtained in Cuba in order to make this treatment fully nationally available. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties of two recombinant EPO formulations in patients with anemia due to end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

Methods

A parallel, randomized, double blind study was performed. A single 100 IU/Kg EPO dose was administered subcutaneously. Heberitro (Heber Biotec, Havana, formulation A), a newly developed product and Eprex (CILAG AG, Switzerland, formulation B), as reference treatment were compared. Thirty-four patients with anemia due to end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis were included. Patients had not received EPO previously. Serum EPO level was measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) during 120 hours after administration. Clinical and laboratory variables were determined as pharmacodynamic and safety criteria until 216 hours.

Results

Both groups of patients were similar regarding all demographic and baseline characteristics. EPO kinetics profiles were similar for both formulations; the pharmacokinetic parameters were very close (i.e., AUC: 4667 vs. 4918 mIU.h/mL; Cmax: 119.1 vs. 119.7 mIU/mL; Tmax: 13.9 vs. 18.1 h; half-life, 20.0 vs. 22.5 h for formulations A and B, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio between both products regarding these metrics were close to the 0.8 – 1.25 range, considered necessary for bioequivalence. Differences did not reach 20% in any case and were not determined by a formulation effect, but probably by a patients' variability effect. Concerning pharmacodynamic features, a high similitude in reticulocyte counts increments until 216 hours and the percentage decrease in serum iron until 120 hours was observed. There were no differences between formulations regarding the adverse events and their intensity. The more frequent events were pain at injection site (35.3%) and hypertension (29%). Additionally, further treatment of the patients with the study product yielded satisfactory increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit values.

Conclusion

The formulations are comparable. The newly developed product should be acceptable for long-term application.

A comparison of the bioequivalence of two formulations of epoetin alfa after subcutaneous injection

BACKGROUND

The previous formulation of epoetin alfa in Japan was a citrate-buffered protein solution containing gelatin hydrolysate as the protein protective agent. To eliminate pain at injection sites, and the risks of anaphylactic shock and unknown infections by gelatin we have developed a new formulation of phosphate-buffered epoetin alfa, which does not contain gelatin hydrolysate.

AIM

To compare the bioequivalence of two formulations of epoetin alfa administered by the subcutaneous route.

METHODS

Four separate studies were performed to assess the bioequivalence of two epoetin alfa formulations using different strength and doses, i.e. 750 IU per 0.5 ml x 0.5 ml (= 750 IU per subject), 750 IU per 0.5 ml x 4 ml (= 6000 IU per subject), 6000 IU per 0.5 ml x 0.5 ml (= 6000 IU per subject) and 24,000 IU per 0.5 ml x 0.125 ml (= 6000 IU per subject). Each study was a single-centre, open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study for which healthy volunteers were enrolled. Bioequivalence was assessed using the confidence interval (CI) of the ratios for the log-transformed, baseline-corrected Cmax and AUC(0,t). Baseline-corrected AUC(0,t) was calculated using the following equation: AUC(0,t) = AUC(0,t), uncorrected -- predose level x observation period.

RESULTS

The ratios (gelatin-free/gelatin-containing) for the log-transformed Cmax and AUC(0,t) after 6000 IU per subject injection of three different concentrations of epoetin alfa were well within the usual range for bioequivalence (90% CI 0.8, 1.25). The 90% CI of the ratio for Cmax after 750 IU per subject injection was 0.906, 1.24, which was within the bioequivalence range. However, the ratio for AUC(0,t) was not determined in this lowest dose because of negative AUC(0,t) values obtained in 12/60 cases. The overall safety data were consistent with those expected for a healthy study population, and did not present any concerns suggestive of adverse effects due to either formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The point estimates and 90% CIs of the ratios of Cmax and AUC(0,t) for the gelatin-free/gelatin-containing formulations indicated that the two formulations are bioequivalent.

Preoperative erythropoietin in spine surgery

Spine surgery may be associated with profuse intraoperative bleeding that often requires blood transfusions. In recent years several techniques have been developed to avoid allogenic transfusions and their potential complications to surgical patients. In this study we review and analyse the role of preoperative recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) administration in spine surgery as a blood conservation strategy. Between 1998 and 2002, a total of 250 patients scheduled for spine surgery were included in our blood-sparing program: 114 patients (group 1), operated on before rHuEPO approval (2000), underwent preoperative autologous blood donation (ABD) alone, and 136 patients operated on after rHuEPO approval (groups 2 and 3) received rHuEPO while undergoing ABD. Adding rHuEPO to ABD resulted in higher haemoglobin and haematocrit values the day of surgery, more ABD units retrieved per patient and, consequently, reduced allogenic transfusion requirements. The effectiveness of rHuEPO as the only preoperative blood conservation technique was evaluated in ten patients with a predicted blood loss of less than 30% of their total volume, scheduled for lumbar surgery. Data from these patients were matched with those from a similar group of patients who had undergone ABD. Patients receiving rHuEPO alone had higher haemoglobin levels the day of surgery than did patients in the ABD program. Neither group required allogenic transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

preoperative rHuEPO is useful for reducing allogenic blood requirements in elective spine surgery. In patients with an expected blood loss of around 50% of blood volume, rHuEPO improves ABD, minimising preoperative anaemia and increasing the number of ABD units collected. In patients with expected blood loss below 30% of total volume, rHuEPO administration may replace ABD.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietins in doping control

The purpose of this paper is: (i) to compare recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) pharmacokinetics in athletes and healthy individuals; and (ii) to report pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies performed in athletes. Effect parameters in PK/PD studies included: (i) red blood cell variables (haematocrit, reticulocyte count); and (ii) markers of iron metabolism (serum soluble transferrin receptors [sTfR], ferritin [fr] and sTfR : fr ratio). To understand the choice of these markers, we first performed a brief review of the pharmacological effects of rHuEPO. Few studies have been conducted in healthy individuals and there are minimal references concerning pharmacokinetics in athletes. A 'flip-flop' phenomenon was noted after subcutaneous administration. The pharmacokinetics appeared linear from 50-1000 U/kg, but this linearity was not observed at the lowest dose of 10 U/kg. A negative-feedback loop of endogenous erythropoietin production occurred at the end of treatment. The half-life of the terminal part of the curves seemed to be slightly higher in athletes (36-42 vs 32 hours) than in untrained individuals and total clearance tended to be greater (17.5 vs 6.5 mL/h/kg). In conclusion, more investigations are needed to better understand the relationship between rHuEPO administration and changes in haematological and iron-metabolism parameters in athletes, particularly after chronic low-dose administration of rHuEPO.

The enigma of the metabolic fate of circulating erythropoietin (Epo) in view of the pharmacokinetics of the recombinant drugs rhEpo and NESP

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) is a mainstay in the treatment of anaemia, primarily in renal failure. Because the half-life of circulating rhEpo is relatively short (4-8 h), the drug is usually administered 2-3 times weekly. Recently, a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP) with a longer half-life (24-26 h) has been approved. NESP possesses two additional N-glycans compared to endogenous Epo or rhEpo. The pharmacokinetics of rhEpo and NESP in humans have been investigated in detail. The composition of the N-glycans is clearly important in determining the biological activity and the velocity of the degradation of Epo and its analogues. However, due to the lack of knowledge of the main site and mechanism of the removal of Epo from circulation, the difference in survival of rhEpo and NESP has remained phenomenological. Investigators have implicated the liver, kidneys, and bone marrow as possible sites of the catabolism of Epo. However, while hepatocytes take up desialylated Epo, the liver does not appear to play a major role in the degradation of intact Epo. Likewise, renal Epo clearance is apparently of secondary importance. Studies showing non-linear pharmacokinetics of Epo suggest that Epo is eliminated by saturable mechanisms. The hormone, as well as the recombinant drugs, can be incorporated by erythrocytic progenitors and other tissues expressing the Epo receptor. The affinity of the Epo receptor for rhEpo is 4.3-fold higher than for NESP. Taken together, it seems most likely that native Epo, rhEpo and NESP are degraded following Epo receptor-mediated uptake, mainly in bone marrow.