Influence of food on the bioavailability of diltiazem and two of its metabolites following the administration of conventional tablets and slow-release capsules

Mechanisms of intestinal pharmacokinetic natural product-drug interactions

The growing co-consumption of botanical natural products with conventional medications has intensified the need to understand potential effects on drug safety and efficacy. This review delves into the intricacies of intestinal pharmacokinetic interactions between botanical natural products and drugs, such as alterations in drug solubility, permeability, transporter activity, and enzyme-mediated metabolism. It emphasizes the importance of understanding how drug solubility, dissolution, and osmolality interplay with botanical constituents in the gastrointestinal tract, potentially altering drug absorption and systemic exposure. Unlike reviews that focus primarily on enzyme and transporter mechanisms, this article highlights the lesser known but equally important mechanisms of interaction. Applying the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) can serve as a framework for predicting and understanding these interactions. Through a comprehensive examination of specific botanical natural products such as byakkokaninjinto, green tea catechins, goldenseal, spinach extract, and quercetin, we illustrate the diversity of these interactions and their dependence on the physicochemical properties of the drug and the botanical constituents involved. This understanding is vital for healthcare professionals to effectively anticipate and manage potential natural product-drug interactions, ensuring optimal patient therapeutic outcomes. By exploring these emerging mechanisms, we aim to broaden the scope of natural product-drug interaction research and encourage comprehensive studies to better elucidate complex mechanisms.

Predictive models for drugs exhibiting negative food effects based on their biopharmaceutical characteristics

CONTEXT

A drug is defined to exhibit food effects if its pharmacokinetic parameter, area under the curve (AUC₀₋∞) is different when co-administered with food in comparison with its administration on a fasted stomach. Food effects of drugs administered in immediate release dosage forms were classified as positive, negative, and no food effects.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, predictive models for negative food effects of drugs that are stable in the gastrointestinal tract and do not complex with Ca²⁺ are reported.

METHODS

An empirical model was developed using five drugs exhibiting negative food effects and seven drugs exhibiting no food effects by multiple regression analysis, based on biopharmaceutical properties generated from in vitro experiments. An oral absorption model was adopted for simulating negative food effects of model compounds using in situ rat intestinal permeability.

RESULTS

Analysis of selected model drugs indicated that percent food effects correlated to their dissociation constant, K (K(a) or K(b)) and Caco-2 permeabilities. The obtained predictive equation was: Food effect (%)=(2.60 x 10⁵·P(app))--(2.91 x 10⁵·K)--8.50. Applying the oral absorption model, the predicted food effects matched the trends of published negative food effects when the two experimental pH conditions of fed and fasted state intestinal environment were used.

CONCLUSION

A predictive model for negative food effects based on the correlation of food effects with dissociation constant and Caco-2 permeability was established and simulations of food effects using rat intestinal permeability supported the drugs? published negative food effects. Thus, an empirical and a mechanistic model as potential tools for predicting negative food effects are reported.

Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration. Clinical implications

Drug-drug, drug-formulation and drug-meal interactions are of clinical concern for orally administered drugs that possess a narrow therapeutic index. This review presents the current status of information regarding interactions which may influence the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of orally administered drugs. Absorption interactions have been classified on the basis of rate-limiting processes. These processes are put in the context of drug and formulation physicochemical properties and oral input influences on variable GI physiology. Interaction categorisation makes use of a biopharmaceutical classification system based on drug aqueous solubility and membrane permeability and their contributions towards absorption variability. Overlaying this classification it is important to be aware of the effect that the magnitudes of drug dosage and volume of fluid administration can have on interactions involving a solubility rate limits. GI regional differences in membrane permeability are fundamental to the rational development of extended release dosage forms as well as to predicting interaction effects on absorption from immediate release dosage forms. The effect of meals on the regional-dependent intestinal elimination of drugs and their involvement in drug absorption interactions is also discussed. Although the clinical significance of such interactions is certainly dependent on the narrowness of the drug therapeutic index, clinical aspects of absorption delays and therapeutic failures resulting from various interactions are also important.

Diltiazem disposition and metabolism in recipients of renal transplants

Diltiazem is widely prescribed in Australasia as a cyclosporine-sparing agent. On seven separate occasions at 2-week intervals, the authors studied eight patients who had undergone renal transplantation, were treated with cyclosporin A, and were in stable condition. The patients were administered escalating doses of conventional-release diltiazem, and (in an extension study) controlled-diffusion diltiazem, to consider the disposition and metabolism of diltiazem. Blood samples were drawn during a 24-hour period, and the AUC(0)(24) of diltiazem and three major metabolites was determined. Results demonstrated that seven patients had comparable diltiazem metabolite AUC(0)(24) profiles, despite considerable variability in parent diltiazem areas under the curve (AUCs), with DM-DTZ > DA-DTZ > DMDA-DTZ. The eighth patient displayed a different metabolite profile. The controlled-diffusion formulation reduced the interpatient variability in diltiazem AUC(0)(24) from 46-fold to <3-fold, but it did not appear to have release characteristics consistent with the manufacturer's specifications. The apparent bioavailability of the conventional-release diltiazem formulation appeared to be highly variable, and this has implications for its use in recipients of organ transplants. The dosage escalation demonstrated a linear relationship between dose and AUC for diltiazem and for each of the metabolites. There may be a subset of patients who display a different diltiazem metabolite profile.

The site of absorption in the small intestine determines diltiazem bioavailability in the rabbit

PURPOSE

Since the ability of the small intestine to biotransform a drug may decrease in distal segments of the intestine, this study aimed to assess whether the site of administration in the small intestine could affect the systemic bioavailability of diltiazem and its two active metabolites, N-desmethyldiltiazem (MA) and desacetyl-diltiazem (M1).

METHODS

Five mg/kg of diltiazem were administered into the lumen of the proximal (0-30 cm, n = 9) or the distal (150-180 cm) small intestine (n = 7) of anesthetized New Zealand rabbits. Blood samples were drawn from the femoral artery for 6 hours, and diltiazem, MA and M1 were assayed by HPLC.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC0-->infinity) of diltiazem administered into the distal small intestine was larger than that estimated when diltiazem was given in the proximal segment (14.20 +/- 2.82 vs 8.14 +/- 0.88 micrograms.min/ml, p < 0.05), due to a lower diltiazem oral clearance (440 +/- 78 vs 660 +/- 55 ml/min/kg, p < 0.05). The AUC0-->360 of MA was not affected by the site of diltiazem administration, but the AUC0-->360 of M1 was increased when diltiazem was administered in the distal segment of the small intestine. When administered into the distal segment of the intestine, the molar sum of diltiazem and its active metabolites was 48% greater than when delivered into the 0-30 cm segment of the small intestine; as a consequence, absorption of diltiazem in distal segments of the small intestine may enhance its pharmacological response.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of absorption into the intestine modulates the bioavailability of diltiazem and its two active metabolites.

Metabolism of diltiazem in hepatic and extrahepatic tissues of rabbits: in vitro studies

Diltiazem (DTZ) is a calcium channel blocker widely used in the treatment of angina and hypertension. DTZ undergoes extensive metabolism yielding several metabolites, some of which are active like N-desmethyldiltiazem (MA), desacetyldiltiazem (M1) and N-desmethyl,desacetyldiltiazem (M2). Due to the nature of its biotransformation, several organs should have the ability to metabolize DTZ, however it is still assumed that the liver is the only organ implicated in its elimination. In this study, the fate of DTZ, MA and M1 was assessed in several organs that could contribute to their biotransformation. To this purpose, DTZ (48.2 microM) was incubated in the 10,000 x g supernatant of homogenates of rabbit tissues for 60 min at 37 degrees C. Multiple samples were withdrawn, and DTZ and its metabolites were assayed by HPLC. The elimination rate constant of DTZ in 10,000 x g supernatants varied between the organs: liver 334 +/- 45, proximal small intestine 69 +/- 11, distal small intestine 25 +/- 3, lungs 15 +/- 6 and kidneys 8 +/- 6 (10(-4) min-1). The metabolism of DTZ in the liver generated large amounts of MA but no M1, and in the small intestine, modest amounts of both metabolites. When MA (50.0 microM) or M1 (53.7 microM) were incubated in liver homogenates, the estimated elimination rate constant were 166 +/- 23 and 468 +/- 53 (10(-4) min-1), respectively. The rate of degradation of the metabolites in the small intestine was much slower.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability of diltiazem sustained-release: influence of food and time of administration

Diltiazem is a calcium channel blocking agent known to be effective in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. To improve the conditions of diltiazem administration in the treatment of hypertensive patients, a sustained-release formulation (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg) allowing a single daily oral administration has been developed. The aim of the present study was to first evaluate the influence of food intake and second to evaluate those of the time of administration on the pharmacokinetic parameters and the bioavailability of this sustained-release formulation. The influence of these factors was investigated over two different open, randomized, cross-over studies in 12 healthy volunteers. Although a significant decrease in Tmax and an increase in Cmax occurred when diltiazem sustained-release was administered with food intake, AUC0-48, and therefore the fraction absorbed, were not modified either by concurrent food intake or by different times of administration. The minor modifications of pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem sustained release observed were unlikely to induce any clinical consequence.

The effect of multiple doses of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of diltiazem in dogs

In order to determine the potential pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ranitidine and diltiazem (DTZ), each of ten male beagle dogs, age 2.7-4.0 years, weight 13-16 kg, received a single oral dose of sustained release DTZ with and without previous multiple oral doses of ranitidine (150 mg bid for five doses). The dog was selected as the animal model because the pharmacokinetics and metabolism profiles of DTZ are similar to those in humans and because sustained release DTZ capsules can be administered with ease to this species. Following the oral dose of DTZ, blood samples (5 ml each) were obtained via a cephalic vein at 0 (just before dosing), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, and 48 h after the dose. Urine samples were collected for 48 h post dose. Plasma and urine concentrations of DTZ and its major metabolites N-monodesmethyl DTZ (MA), deacetyl DTZ (M1), and deacetyl N-monodesmethyl DTZ (M2) were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-linear curve fitting, and the effect of ranitidine was evaluated by two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pre-treatment of the animals did not significantly alter the disposition of DTZ (p > 0.05). Similar to the results reported in clinical studies, there were large variations in the plasma and urine concentrations of DTZ and its major metabolites among the beagle dogs. The effect of ranitidine on the disposition of DTZ was highly variable.

Individual variation in first-pass metabolism

Individual variation in pharmacokinetics has long been recognised. This variability is extremely pronounced in drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Drug concentrations obtained from individuals given the same dose could range several-fold, even in young healthy volunteers. In addition to the liver, which is the major organ for drug and xenobiotic metabolism, the gut and the lung can contribute significantly to variability in first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, the contributions of the latter 2 organs are difficult to quantify because conventional in vivo methods for quantifying first-pass metabolism are not sufficiently specific. Drugs that are mainly eliminated by phase II metabolism (e.g. estrogens and progestogens, morphine, etc.) undergo significant first-pass gut metabolism. This is because the gut is rich in conjugating enzymes. The role of the lung in first-pass metabolism is not clear, although it is quite avid in binding basic drugs such as lidocaine (lignocaine), propranolol, etc. Factors such as age, gender, disease states, enzyme induction and inhibition, genetic polymorphism and food effects have been implicated in causing variability in pharmacokinetics of drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Of various factors considered, age and gender make the least evident contributions, whereas genetic polymorphism, enzymatic changes due to induction or inhibition, and the effects of food are major contributors to the variability in first-pass metabolism. These factors can easily cause several-fold variations. Polymorphic disposition of imipramine and propafenone, an increase in verapamil first-pass metabolism by rifampicin (rifampin), and the effects of food on propranolol, metoprolol and propafenone, are typical examples. Unfortunately, the contributions of these factors towards variability are unpredictable and tend to be drug-dependent. A change in steady-state clearance of a drug can sometimes be exacerbated when first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of a drug are simultaneously altered. Therefore, an understanding of the source of variability is the key to the optimisation of therapy.

In vitro/in vivo correlation of prolonged release dosage forms containing diltiazem HCI

Six preparations were considered: three multiple unit dosage forms (micropellets in capsules) (D, E and G) and one matrix tablet (B) were experimental prolonged release formulations, two non-disintegrating tablets (A and C) were commercial products. The in vitro dissolution behaviour of the differing formulations was investigated using the USP XXII paddle apparatus. The in vivo study was effected on a panel of 12 healthy volunteers. The two commercial tablets (A and C) showed mean dissolution time (MDT) of 1.34 and 1.44 h and td of 91 and 92 min, respectively; for prolonged release formulations (B, E, D, and G) MDT ranged between 2.28 and 4.23 h and td between 149 and 291 min. The mean residence time (MRT) was 8.68 and 6.47 h for tablets A and C, respectively; it ranged between 9.62 and 10.24 h for the multiple unit formulations E, D, and G and was 11.27 h for matrix B. Formulation B also showed the higher apparent elimination half-life t1/2 (7.12 h), while apparent t1/2 for all the other formulations were very similar, ranging between 5.04 and 5.28 h. High variability between the various formulations was found for Cmax and AUC values, and no relationships could be established with the type of formulation. An in vitro/in vivo correlation was found for all the formulations examined on the basis of analogous parameters (MDT and MRT); (r = 0.83, p < 0.05). In a few cases the Wagner-Nelson deconvolution method was applied to individual plasma level versus time curves and the corresponding absorption curves were obtained. In these cases the in vitro/in vivo correlation was tested on the basis of the comparison of the in vivo absorption curves with the in vitro dissolution profiles. This was accomplished using the 'Levy's plot' (per cent released versus per cent absorbed) approach and provided further support for the correlation found.