Risk management of teratogenic medicines: A systematic review

Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection in pregnancy: A systematic review of international guidelines

BACKGROUND

Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging pathogen, which has been linked to cervicitis, urethritis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). With the advent of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for sexually transmitted infections, it is increasingly being identified in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review international guidelines, which had explicit recommendations for treatment of M. genitalium infection in pregnancy and breastfeeding.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were reviewed with no age, species, language or date restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they had an explicit recommendation for treatment of M. genitalium in pregnancy. Studies were excluded if there was no recommendation in pregnancy, if they referred to other international guideline recommendations or were historical versions of guidelines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

References were manually reviewed and 50 papers were selected for review. Only four guidelines were included in the final analysis and they were from Europe, UK, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

MAIN RESULTS

All studies recommended azithromycin as first-line treatment, and advised against moxifloxacin use. The dosing schedule of azithromycin, varied between guidelines, as did the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections. Safety data was generally reassuring for azithromycin but inconsistent for pristinamycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin is the first-line treatment for macrolide susceptible or unknown resistance infections, but there is a lack of consistency regarding dosing of azithromycin or the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections in pregnancy/lactation.

Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans

In recent history, the world has witnessed a trend towards liberalization of abortion laws driven by an increasing understanding of the negative personal and public health consequences of criminalizing abortion. By contrast, several countries have recently implemented restrictive reproductive laws, joining the 112 countries where access to abortion care is banned completely or with narrow exceptions. On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned its landmark decisions in Roe v Wade that established abortion until the point of viability of the fetus as a constitutional right. After Roe v Wade having been overturned, it is projected that many women in the USA will be prevented from accessing safe abortion care. Importantly, abortion bans not only impose constraints on patient autonomy, they also restrict physicians' ability to practice evidence-based medicine, which will negatively impact psychiatric care. It is therefore crucial for the practicing psychiatrist to be familiar with this new legal landscape. In this Personal View, we aim to provide a topical overview to help clinicians gain a clear understanding of legal, clinical, and ethical responsibilities, focusing on the USA. We also discuss the reality that psychiatrists might be called upon to determine medical necessity for an abortion on psychiatric grounds, which is new for most US psychiatrists. We predict that psychiatrists will be confronted with very difficult situations in which lawful and ethical conduct might be incongruent, and that abortion bans will result in greater numbers of patients needing psychiatric care from a system that is ill-prepared for additional demands.

Prescription retinoid and contraception use in women in Australia: A population-based study

BACKGROUND/OBECTIVES

Oral retinoids are teratogenic, and pregnancy avoidance is an important part of retinoid prescribing. Australia does not have a standardised pregnancy prevention programme for women using oral retinoids, and the contraception strategies for women who use oral retinoids are not well understood. The objectives were to determine trends in the use of prescription retinoids among Australian reproductive-aged women and whether women dispensed oral retinoids used contraception concomitantly.

METHODS

This was a population-based study using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits (PBS) dispensing claims for a random 10% sample of 15-44-year-old Australian women, 2013 - 2021. We described rates and annual trends in dispensing claims for PBS-listed retinoids and contraceptives. We also estimated concomitant oral retinoid and contraceptive use on the day of each retinoid dispensing and determined if there was a period of contraceptive treatment that overlapped. Estimates were then extrapolated to the national level.

RESULTS

There were 1,545,800 retinoid dispensings to reproductive-aged women; 57.1% were oral retinoids. The rate of retinoid dispensing to reproductive-aged women increased annually, from 28 dispensings per 1000 population in 2013 to 41 per 1000 in 2021. The rate of oral retinoid dispensing doubled over the study period, from 14 dispensings per 1000 population in 2013 to 28 per 1000 in 2021, while topical retinoid dispensing did not change. Only 25% of oral retinoid dispensings had evidence of concomitant contraceptive use in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of oral retinoid dispensing have doubled among reproductive-aged women over the past decade. A large percentage of oral retinoid use does not appear to have concomitant contraception use, posing a risk of teratogenic effects in pregnancies.

Review of Teratogenic Effects of Leflunomide, Accutane, Thalidomide, Warfarin, Tetracycline, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Teratogenic agents have been shown to have drastic and detrimental effects on fetuses if exposed to the agent during uterine life. The most sensitive time for a developing fetus is during the first trimester, and teratogenic exposure during this time can lead to severe deformities in the fetus. The Food and Drug Administration has categorized teratogenic agents based on the severity of their effect on the fetus; these categories include A, B, C, D, and X. Category A is the safest, with the most dangerous, and highly contraindicated in pregnant patients being Category X. This review article will discuss the teratogenic agents leflunomide, isotretinoin, thalidomide, warfarin, tetracycline, and angiotensinogen-converting enzyme inhibitors. Leflunomide can cause cranioschisis, exencephaly, and vertebral, head, and limb malformations. Isotretinoin's main teratogenic effects include central nervous system malformations, hydrocephalus, eye abnormalities, cardiac septal defects, thymus abnormalities, spontaneous abortions, and external ear abnormalities. Thalidomide has been shown to cause limb deformities, bowel atresia, and heart defects when the embryo is exposed to the agent during development. Warfarin can lead to spontaneous abortion and intrauterine death, as well as nasal hypoplasia, hypoplasia of extremities, cardiac defects, scoliosis, and mental retardation when exposed in utero. Tetracycline's teratogenic effects include gastrointestinal distress, esophageal ulceration and strictures, teeth discoloration, hepatotoxicity, and calcifications. Angiotensinogen-converting enzyme inhibitors can cause skull hyperplasia, anuria, hypotension, renal failure, lung hypoplasia, skeletal deformation, oligohydramnios, and fetal death. Teratogenic effects can be avoided if the pregnant patient is educated on the teratogenic effects of these agents.

Dialysis in Pregnancy: An Update Review

Chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are important public health problems with increased rates of morbidity, mortality, and social costs. Pregnancy is rare in patients with ESKD, with reduced fertility rates in women undergoing dialysis. Although current advances have led to an increase in live births in pregnant dialysis patients, this modality still has an increased risk of multiple adverse events in pregnant women. Despite these existing risks, large-scale studies investigating the management of pregnant women on dialysis are lacking, resulting in the absence of consensus guidelines for this patient group. In this review, we aimed to present the effects of dialysis during pregnancy. We first discuss pregnancy outcomes in dialysis patients and the development of acute kidney injury during pregnancy. Then, we discuss our recommendations for the management of pregnant dialysis patients, including the maintenance of pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen levels, the ideal frequency and duration of hemodialysis sessions, as well as the modality of renal replacement therapies, the difficulty of maintaining peritoneal dialysis in the third trimester of pregnancy, and optimization of prepregnancy modifiable risk factors. Finally, we present our recommendations for future studies investigating dialysis among pregnant patients.

Women's experiences of over-the-counter and prescription medication during pregnancy in the UK: findings from survey free-text responses and narrative interviews

OBJECTIVES

To explore women's experiences of over-the-counter and prescription medication advice and use during pregnancy.

DESIGN

A study design consisting of an online survey and nested in-depth interviews with a subsample of participants. We analysed data from survey free-text responses and in-depth interviews using thematic analysis. Quantitative survey data is published elsewhere.

SETTING

The UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Women were eligible if living in the UK, aged 16-45 years, were pregnant or had been pregnant in the last 5 years regardless of pregnancy outcome. A total of 7090 women completed the survey, and 34 women who collectively had experienced 68 pregnancies were subsequently interviewed.

RESULTS

Medication prescribing and use during pregnancy was common. The prescribing, dispensing and taking of some advised medications were restricted through women's or prescribers' fear of fetal harm. Lack of adherence to national prescribing guidance, conflicting professional opinion and poor communication resulted in maternal anxiety, avoidable morbidity and women negotiating complex and distressing pathways to obtain recommended medications. In contrast, some women felt overmedicated and that pharmacological treatments were used without exploring other options first.

CONCLUSION

Increased translation of national guidance into practice and greater personalisation of antenatal care are needed to improve the safety, efficacy and personalisation of prescribing in pregnancy.

Awareness, knowledge and practice of healthcare professionals following implementation of a Pregnancy Prevention Program for sodium valproate in Ireland: a multi-stakeholder cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To establish awareness, knowledge, use and experience in practice of a sodium valproate pregnancy prevention program (PPP) in Ireland ("prevent") among three healthcare professional (HCP) groups.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using anonymous online surveys was conducted among general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists, and specialist consultants. Descriptive analyses are presented.

RESULTS

HCP response rates were 5.8% for GPs (90/1544), 10.7% for pharmacists (219/2052), and 7.6% for specialists (17/224). Across HCP groups, there was high awareness (>90%) for specialist referral when female valproate patients are planning pregnancy, or become pregnant, but less awareness to refer annually for specialist review. While awareness of a possible teratogenic effect at any stage of pregnancy was high (>80%), most GPs (62.2%, 95% CI: 51.3, 71.9%) and community pharmacists (53.1%, 95% CI: 43.2, 62.8%) were unsure of the magnitude of risk for developmental disorders, while most specialists under-estimated this risk (46.7%, 95% CI: 24.8, 69.9%). Although >70% of the respondents identified valproate to be contraindicated in any woman of childbearing potential unless the conditions of the PPP are fulfilled, experience implementing key elements in practice varied.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest continued effort is needed to ensure optimal implementation of "prevent" into clinical practice in Ireland.

Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an inflammatory, autoimmune disease encompassing a broad spectrum of subtypes including acute, subacute, chronic and intermittent CLE. Among these, chronic CLE can be further classified into several subclasses of lupus erythematosus (LE) such as discoid LE, verrucous LE, LE profundus, chilblain LE and Blaschko linear LE. To provide all dermatologists and rheumatologists with a practical guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of CLE, this evidence- and consensus-based guideline was developed following the checklist established by the international Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) Working Group and was registered at the International Practice Guideline Registry Platform. With the joint efforts of the Asian Dermatological Association (ADA), the Asian Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AADV) and the Lupus Erythematosus Research Center of Chinese Society of Dermatology (CSD), a total of 25 dermatologists, 7 rheumatologists, one research scientist on lupus and 2 methodologists, from 16 countries/regions in Asia, America and Europe, participated in the development of this guideline. All recommendations were agreed on by at least 80% of the 32 voting physicians. As a consensus, diagnosis of CLE is mainly based on the evaluation of clinical and histopathological manifestations, with an exclusion of SLE by assessment of systemic involvement. For localized CLE lesions, topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are first-line treatment. For widespread or severe CLE lesions and (or) cases resistant to topical treatment, systemic treatment including antimalarials and (or) short-term corticosteroids can be added. Notably, antimalarials are the first-line systemic treatment for all types of CLE, and can also be used in pregnant patients and pediatric patients. Second-line choices include thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone and MTX, whereas MMF is third-line treatment. Finally, pulsed-dye laser or surgery can be added as fourth-line treatment for localized, refractory lesions of CCLE in cosmetically unacceptable areas, whereas belimumab may be used as fourth-line treatment for widespread CLE lesions in patients with active SLE, or recurrence of ACLE during tapering of corticosteroids. As for management of the disease, patient education and a long-term follow-up are necessary. Disease activity, damage of skin and other organs, quality of life, comorbidities and possible adverse events are suggested to be assessed in every follow-up visit, when appropriate.

Ethical issues in therapeutic use and research in pregnant and breastfeeding women

Pregnant or potentially pregnant women have historically been excluded from clinical trials of new medications. However, it is increasingly recognised that it is imperative to generate evidence from the population in whom the drugs are likely to be used to inform safe, evidence-based shared clinical decision making. Reluctance by researchers and regulators to perform such studies often relates to concerns about risk, particularly to the foetus. However, this must be offset against the risk of untreated disease or using a drug in pregnancy where safety, efficacy and dosing information are not known. This review summarises the historical perspective, and the ethical and legal frameworks that inform the conduct of such research, then highlights examples of innovative practice that have enabled high quality, ethical research to proceed to inform the evidence-based use of medication in pregnancy.