Randomized clinical trial of hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Combination locoregional and systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Locoregional therapies play a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with early and intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. With encouraging recent advances in immunotherapy-based systemic therapies, locoregional therapies are being both promoted and challenged by new systemic therapy options. Combined locoregional and systemic therapies might enhance treatment outcomes compared with either option alone. This Series paper summarises the existing data on locoregional and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses evidence from studies investigating their combination with a focus on their synergistic efficacy and safety.

Advances in radiation therapy for HCC: Integration with liver-directed treatments

HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality with increasing incidence worldwide. Historically, treatment for early disease includes liver transplantation, surgical resection, and/or other local therapies, such as thermal ablation. As a result of technical advances and high-quality prospective data, the use of definitive external beam radiotherapy with ablative doses has emerged. Intermediate-stage disease has been generally addressed with arterially directed therapies (eg, chemoembolization or radioembolization) and external beam radiotherapy, while advanced stages have been addressed by systemic therapy or best supportive care. The role of each local/locoregional therapy has rapidly evolved in the context of novel pharmacotherapies, including immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents. The combinations, indications, and timing of treatments vary widely among specialties and geographies. Here, we aim to synthesize the best quality evidence available regarding the efficacy and safety of different liver-directed modalities, with a focus on recent prospective clinical data of external beam radiotherapy within the context of other available liver-directed therapies across Barcelona Liver Classification (BCLC) stages.

Establishment of a clinical model based on vessels encapsulating tumour clusters that could efficiently predict recurrence of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy

According to previous studies, vessels encapsulating tumour clusters (VETC) could promote metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a manner independent from epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the prognostic significance of VETC among patients undergoing curative hepatectomy has not been fully explored. This study was performed to assess the prognostic significance of VETC among patients with HCC undergoing curative hepatectomy. A total of 81 patients were included in this study. A predictive model based on VETC was established, then this model was compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Tumor Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) stage and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. It was revealed by multivariate Cox regression analysis that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [p=0.013, hazard ratio (HR)=6.175, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.468-25.977], number of tumours (p<0.001, HR=4.119, 95% CI 1.886-8.995) and VETC positivity (p=0.010, HR=2.440, 95% CI 1.235-4.821) were independent predictive factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, by Kaplan-Meier analysis, we revealed that VETC positivity was associated with worse DFS (p=0.018). The clinical predictive model combining the NLR, number of tumours, and VETC was compared with AJCC TNM stage and BCLC classification system by performing time-dependent receiver operating curve (td-ROC) analysis, revealing that the clinical predictive model was superior to AJCC TNM stage and BCLC system at different timepoints. Additionally, we demonstrated that the clinical model could well predict DFS by plotting calibration curves. VETC could be utilised as an efficient prognostic factor for HCC and the clinical predictive model combining the NLR, number of tumours, and VETC was superior to AJCC TNM stage and BCLC system in predicting cancer recurrence.

Lasso-Based Nomogram for Predicting Early Recurrence Following Radical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy with a high recurrence rate following curative resection. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to early recurrence (within 2 years) and develop a Lasso-based nomogram for individualized risk assessment.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 206 hCC patients who underwent curative resection at Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang Province, from January 2019 to August 2022. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=144) and validation (n=62) cohorts. Lasso regression was used to identify potential recurrence risk factors among 17 candidate predictors. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed based on variables selected by Lasso. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Five independent predictors of early HCC recurrence were identified: age, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, cirrhosis, tumor diameter, and microvascular invasion (MVI). The nomogram demonstrated area under the curve (AUC) values for recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 0.828 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.753-0.904) at 1 year, 0.799 (95% CI: 0.718-0.880) at 2 years, and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.642-0.842) at 5 years in the training cohort. The corresponding AUCs in the validation cohort were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.686-0.960), 0.804 (95% CI: 0.686-0.922), and 0.857 (95% CI: 0.722-0.992) at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the nomogram's high accuracy and clinical utility.

Conclusion

The Lasso-Cox regression nomogram effectively predicts HCC recurrence within two years post-hepatectomy, providing a valuable tool for personalized postoperative management to improve patient outcomes.

Overall survival is comparable between percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and liver resection as first-line therapies for solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Few studies have compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to clarify this issue.

METHODS

Patients with Child-Pugh class A liver disease and a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent LR or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study; 310 patients underwent LR and 114 patients underwent percutaneous RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables, including age, sex, alpha-fetoprotein level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the percutaneous RFA group than in the LR group (both p < 0.001). After PSM, 5-year OS was comparable between the two modalities (p = 0.367); however, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the LR group (p = 0.001). The two modalities did not differ in severe post-treatment complications (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year OS did not differ between treatment modalities for patients with a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm; however, the LR group's 5-year RFS was superior. LR should be recommended as the first-line treatment for these patients.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expanding Cornerstone of Care in the Era of Immunotherapy

Liver transplantation (LT) has been accepted as a cornerstone of care in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for almost three decades. In recent years, its role has been evolving to include patients with disease burden beyond the widely used Milan criteria. The integration of dynamic biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein together with downstaging approaches and tumor evolution after enlistment has allowed the selection of patients most likely to benefit, resulting in 5-year survival rates greater that 70%. With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across all stages of disease, alone or in combination with locoregional therapies, there is now the potential to further expand the patient population with HCC who may benefit from LT. This brings challenges, given the global shortage of organs and the need to better understand the optimal use of ICIs before transplantation. Furthermore, the field of transplant oncology awaits additional biomarkers that can predict those likely to benefit from ICIs. More than ever, a multidisciplinary approach for liver cancer management is critical to ensure all patients are considered for LT where appropriate, and do not miss the opportunity for long-term survival.

Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.

Precision oncology: The role of minimally-invasive ablation therapy in the management of solid organ tumors

Solid organ tumors present a significant healthcare challenge, both economically and logistically, due to their high incidence and treatment complexity. In 2023, out of the 1.9 million new cancer cases in the United States, over 73% were solid organ tumors. Ablative therapies offer minimally invasive solutions for malignant tissue destruction in situ, often with reduced cost and morbidity compared to surgical resection. This review examines the current Food and Drug Administration-approved locoregional ablative therapies (radiofrequency, microwave, cryogenic, high-intensity focused ultrasound, histotripsy) and their evolving role in cancer care. Data were collected through a comprehensive survey of the PubMed-indexed literature on tumor ablation techniques, their clinical indications, and outcomes. Over time, emerging clinical data will help establish these therapies as the standard of care in solid organ tumor treatment, supported by improved long-term outcomes and progression-free survival.

Albumin-Bilirubin Grade as a Valuable Predictor of Recurrence and Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Radiofrequency Ablation

Background/Objectives: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an important local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of tumor recurrence after RFA and analyze predictors of tumor recurrence and survival in patients with HCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from treatment-naïve patients with HCC who underwent RFA for HCC treatment between 2008 and 2017 at four tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Results: A total of 636 patients with HCC treated with RFA were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.4 years, with 75.0% of patients being male. Most patients (96.7%) had underlying liver cirrhosis, and viral hepatitis (types B and C) accounted for most cases. The average maximum tumor size was 2.2 ± 0.9 cm, with 84.3% of tumors being single lesions. During the follow-up period, 331 patients experienced recurrence, with 95.5% of cases being intrahepatic and one-fifth occurring at the RFA site. Most patients underwent RFA or transarterial chemoembolization as subsequent therapy for recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and Child-Pugh class B status were independent factors associated with tumor recurrence. Only the ALBI grade was significantly associated with mortality. Additionally, the ALBI grade differentiated between recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Conclusions: The ALBI grade was independently associated with tumor recurrence and prognosis in patients with HCC following RFA. This grading system can help clinicians identify high-risk patients, optimize treatment strategies, and enhance patient care.

Oncological outcomes of tumor ablation compared to surgical resection in early-stage hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) remains controversial, with recent conflicted guidelines. This systematic review evaluated whether ablation is oncologically non-inferior to surgical resection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing tumor ablation and surgical resection for early-stage HCCs. A non-inferiority margin of 5% (RR 0.93) for overall survival (OS) was considered, following a consensus of clinical experts.

RESULTS

We identified 5829 citations from which 11 trials (n = 1736) were included. The non-inferiority of tumor ablation was not observed for OS (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.85-1.00,I2 = 33%). Recurrence-free survival was reduced with ablation (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.69-0.93,I2 = 49%). There was no difference in terms of extra-hepatic recurrence and minor complications. Tumor ablation was associated with decreased overall morbidity (RR 0.43; 95%CI 0.30-0.62,I2 = 31%) and major complications (RR 0.22; 95%CI 0.07-0.71,I2 = 66%). Intra-hepatic recurrence was higher with ablation (RR 1.28; 95%CI 1.10-1.48,I2 = 12%). Certainty of evidence was low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe the oncological non-inferiority of tumor ablation when compared to surgical resection. Nevertheless, most analyses were of low quality of evidence, including the overall survival. We cannot exclude that the true effect of tumor ablation is different than the currently observed one.

Benefits and drawbacks of radiofrequency ablation via percutaneous or minimally invasive surgery for treating hepatocellular carcinoma

The management of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant challenges. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown safety and effectiveness in treating HCC, with lower mortality rates and shorter hospital stays, its high recurrence rate remains a significant impediment. Consequently, achieving improved survival solely through RFA is challenging, particularly in retrospective studies with inherent biases. Ultrasound is commonly used for guiding percutaneous RFA, but its low contrast can lead to missed tumors and the risk of HCC recurrence. To enhance the efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA, various techniques such as artificial ascites and contrast-enhanced ultrasound have been developed to facilitate complete tumor ablation. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers advantages over open surgery and has gained traction in various surgical fields. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic intraoperative RFA (IORFA) may be more effective than percutaneous RFA in terms of survival for HCC patients unsuitable for surgery, highlighting its significance. Therefore, combining MIS-IORFA with these enhanced percutaneous RFA techniques may hold greater significance for HCC treatment using the MIS-IORFA approach. This article reviews liver resection and RFA in HCC treatment, comparing their merits and proposing a trajectory involving their combination in future therapy.

Laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Minimally invasive techniques have significantly gained popularity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the Milan criteria. However, whether or not laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a better treatment option remains debatable. We conducted a meta-analysis to review the published data comparing LLR and RFA for HCC through Milan criteria depending on tumor recurrence risk and survival.

Methods

PubMed, OvidSP, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2023. The studies comparing the outcomes and methods between LLR and RFA for HCC within the Milan criteria were included.

Results

We recruited 19 cohort studies with 2532 patients. The postoperative complication rate was low, and hospital stays were shorter in the RFA group than in the LLR group. The total tumor recurrence, the local tumor recurrence rate, and the intrahepatic tumor recurrence rate were lower within the LLR group than in the RFA group. There was no significant difference in the extrahepatic recurrence rate between the two groups. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between the groups concerning 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, 3-year and 5-year RFS were better within the LLR group than among the RFA group.

Conclusions

The treatment of HCC within the Milan criteria is moving toward multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approaches. Our meta-analysis identified a lower postoperative complication rate and higher recurrence rate for RFA than LLR. RFA could be an alternative treatment due to its comparable long-term efficacy with LLR.

Liver resection in patients with a history of local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma has the risk of poor survival and serosal invasion

Aim

The aim was to evaluate the impact of previous local ablation (LA) on long‐term prognoses and tumor histopathological findings following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study used data from patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC at Ehime University Hospital between October 2003 and July 2021. Using data from a total of 234 patients, after excluding patients with distant metastasis or macroscopic residual tumors and patients with mixed HCC, a group of 39 patients who underwent post‐ablation liver resection (PALR) was compared with a group of 195 non‐PALR patients with respect to patient characteristics, perioperative data, pathological findings, and outcomes.

Results

Number of tumors was significantly greater and diameter of tumor was smaller in PALR group than those of non‐PALR group. Both overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) were significantly poor in PALR group than those of non‐PALR (5‐year OS 54.1% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.024; 5‐year RFS 24.7% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.019). However, PALR was not selected as independent prognosticator in multivariate analyses. In PALR group, tumor size ≥3 cm was sole independent prognosticator in multivariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that PALR [odds ratio (OR), 8.989; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.807–28.787], alpha‐fetoprotein level >40 ng/mL (OR, 2.923; 95% CI, 1.063–8.035), and des‐γ‐carboxyprothrombin level >170 mAU/mL (OR, 5.164; 95% CI, 1.622–16.438) were independent predictors of pathological serosal invasion.

Conclusions

Hepatectomy for patients with history of LA for HCC had a risk of serosal invasion and poor survival.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Several locoregional therapies (LRTs) for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are available; however, a global comparison of the relative efficacy of each is needed.

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analytic comparison of all identified randomized clinical trials evaluating the treatment of nonmetastatic HCC.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search of PubMed and the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meetings from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2023, was performed.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials using a form of LRT (surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, radiofrequency ablation [RFA], microwave ablation [MWA], radiotherapy [RT], hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC], transarterial bland embolization [TAE], transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], or transarterial radioembolization [TARE]).

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Study eligibility and data extraction were each reviewed by 2 authors independently. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compare treatment categories.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome; overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome.

Results

Forty randomized clinical trials reporting on comparative outcomes of 11 576 total patients with localized HCC treated with LRT were included. The median follow-up was 30.0 (IQR, 18.5-40.8) months. Direct pooled comparisons between treatment classes suggested improved outcomes for surgery combined with adjuvant therapy over surgery alone (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.51-0.75]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48-0.78]; P < .001), surgery over RFA (PFS: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; P = .02), RT over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.60]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.13-0.97]; P = .04), and HAIC over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.72]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.75]; P < .001). No substantial heterogeneity was noted for any pairwise comparison with the exception of RT-based regimens compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analysis suggest that all LRTs are not equivalent for the treatment of localized HCC. The efficacy of LRTs appears hierarchical, with surgery-based management outcomes associated with the best treatment outcomes and embolization-based treatment options associated with the worst treatment outcomes.

Ablative Treatments and Surgery for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and liver resection (LR), with the aim of evaluating treatment plans for early-stage HCC.

METHODS

Studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from April 1, 2004, to April 1, 2024, were searched. Articles were evaluated for quality using the randomized controlled trials tool. Two tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data obtained from the literature were netted using Stata 15.0 and r 4.2.3. The assessed primary outcomes were OS and DFS at 1 and 3 y.

RESULTS

A total of 25 publications with 4548 patients were included, including 13 studies in mainland China and 12 in other regions. For 1-y DFS, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.38-0.76) for LR compared with RFA and 0.57 (95% CrI: 0.3--0.82) for LR compared with MWA. For 3-y DFS, the HR was 0.52 (95% CrI: 0.38-0.72) for LR compared with RFA and 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.37-0.76). In the Chinese mainland, LR may have a better 1- and 3-y DFS than MWA, but similar survival to RFA. In the other regions, LR had a better DFS than MWA and RFA patients. The rest of the comparisons were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For early-stage HCC, LR may be more effective in reducing tumor recurrence than ablative treatments. Cryoablation may be a potential treatment for HCC. The differences in treatment effectiveness in different regions are worth further study.

Meta analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in small and large nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Although studies have indicated comparable outcomes between RFA and surgical resection in early HCC, there is still unclear evidence of benefit in larger tumor sizes. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of RFA versus surgical resection in HCC patients, considering nodule size with a cutoff at 3 cm.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted. The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULT

Surgical resection showed superior OS (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.27, p = 0.008) and RFS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.11-1.25, p < 0.00001), compared to RFA. For nodules less than 3 cm or larger than 5 cm, the OS and RFS in the surgical resection group were significantly higher than those in the RFA group, while no significant differences were observed for nodules sized 3-5 cm. However, significantly more adverse events occurred following surgical resection (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection has better OS and RFS compared to RFA for liver tumors less than 3 cm or larger than 5 cm. For liver tumors sized 3-5 cm, RFA and surgical resection yield similar findings. RFA may become a preferable option in these 3-5 cm tumors due to its comparable efficacy and fewer adverse events for patients unsuitable for surgery.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm

Background & Aims

Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm.

Methods

Patients with a single HCC lesion ≤5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed.

Results

A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n = 166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p <0.001), especially for patients with tumours >2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, p <0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p <0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all p >0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels.

Impact and implications

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative treatment to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumours >3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumours. This study focused on HCC patients with a specific tumour burden, namely a single lesion ≤5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.

Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma in a resource-poor setting: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation compared with percutaneous ethanol injection in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to the objective response rate and costs related to the procedure.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center randomized trial. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were the complete response rate according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 60 days after randomization and the complication rate within 180 60 days.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were placed into the following groups: percutaneous ethanol injection (n=23) and radiofrequency ablation (n=27). Fifty-four nodules were randomized (mean follow-up: 205.37 days). The estimated mean hospital cost was US$ 1854.11 and US$ 2770.96 for the Radiofrequency Ablation and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Groups, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$ -2674.59, which is advantageous for radiofrequency ablation. After 60 d, 28 of 29 nodules in the Radiofrequency Ablation Group achieved complete response versus 12 of 22 in the Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Group (RD, 42.01 [95%CI= 20.55-63.24]; p<0.001). Only four early complications were observed among patients treated by percutaneous ethanol injection (p<0.05). Late complications occurred in two and one patient(s) in the Radiofrequency Ablation and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Groups (p>0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation was more cost-effective and achieved higher complete response and lower complication rates than the Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Group within this cohort.

REGISTRY OF CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT06450613.

Therapeutic analysis of 632 cases treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to analyze the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 632 patients with HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging (BCLC) System stages 0, A, and B from Beijing You'an Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University. The primary outcomes analyzed were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes included one-, three-, and five-year OS rates among different groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for 632 cases identified with HCC was 52.1 months (range: 3-162 months), while 127 patients died during follow-up. The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 97.1 %, 89.5 %, and 80.4 %, respectively. Moreover, the one-, three-, and five-year PFS rates were 58.1 %, 29.3 %, and 19.8 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the BCLC stages and complete ablation were independent predictors of OS and PFS (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in OS rate among TACE-RFA, TACE-MWA, and TACE-CA groups, but TACE-CA showed better efficacy in improving the PFS rate (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TACE and ablation is effective in early-stage HCC and BCLC stage B. Complete ablation and BCLC stages are significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to validate these findings.

Percutaneous ablation in perivascular-HCC: impact of liver parenchyma and characteristics of vascular structures on the outcomes

AIM

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for small-HCC (<3 cm). However, some features such as proximity to intrahepatic vascular structures (perivascular location) seem to be related to short- and long-term outcomes. The aims of the study were to investigate the features related to ablation success and local tumor progression (LTP) in patients submitted to percutaneous ablation for perivascular-HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2021, 132 perivascular-HCC nodules ablated with US-guided single probe percutaneous RFA were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and multivariable Cox regression model were used to identify factors that were independently related to ablation success and LTP-free survival.

RESULTS

The overall ablation success rate was 71.9% (n=95). Morbidity and mortality rates were 4.0% and 0.0%. The features related to ablation success: nodule size (≤20 mm vs. >20 mm) (OR 2.442, p=0.031), major vascular structures diameter (3-5 mm vs ≥ 5 mm) (OR 2.167, p=0.037) and liver parenchyma (cirrhosis vs no-cirrhosis) (OR 2.373, p=0.033). The following features resulted independently related to better LTP-free survival: nodule size ≤20 mm (HR 2.802, p=0.003), proximity to glissonean pedicles (HR 1.677, p=0.028), and major vascular structure diameter <5 mm (HR 1.987, p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Perivascular location confirmed to be a difficult and unfavorable indication for percutaneous ablation for HCC nodules. However, perivascular nodules not suitable for surgery with low-risk features (size <20 mm, proximity to glissonian pedicles and vascular diameter <5 mm) may be treated with RFA with satisfactory outcomes.

Short-Term Out-of-Pocket and Total Costs of Care After Ablation, Resection, or Transplant for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National SEER-Medicare Cost Comparison

BACKGROUND. Differences in survival and morbidity among treatment options (ablation, surgical resection, and transplant) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been well studied. Additional understanding of the costs of such care would help to identify drivers of high costs and potential barriers to care delivery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to quantify total and patient out-of-pocket costs for ablation, surgical resection, and transplant in the management of early-stage HCC and to identify factors predictive of these costs. METHODS. This retrospective U.S. population-based study used the SEER-Medicare linked dataset to identify a sample of 1067 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 73 years; 674 men, 393 women) diagnosed with early-stage HCC (size ≤ 5 cm) treated with ablation (n = 623), resection (n = 201), or transplant (n = 243) between January 2009 and December 2016. Total costs and patient out-of-pocket costs for the index procedure as well as for any care within 30 and 90 days after the procedure were identified and stratified by treatment modality. Additional comparisons were performed among propensity score-matched subgroups of patients treated by ablation or resection (each n = 172). Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors predictive of total costs and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30- and 90-day post-procedure periods. RESULTS. For ablation, resection, and transplant, median index-procedure total cost was US$6689, US$25,614, and US$66,034; index-procedure out-of-pocket cost was US$1235, US$1650, and US$1317; 30-day total cost was US$9456, US$29,754, and US$69,856; 30-day out-of-pocket cost was US$1646, US$2208, and US$3198; 90-day total cost was US$14,572, US$34,984, and US$88,103; and 90-day out-of-pocket cost was US$2138, US$2462, and US$3876, respectively (all p < .001). In propensity score-matched subgroups, ablation and resection had median index-procedure, 30-day, and 90-day total costs of US$6690 and US$25,716, US$9995 and US$30,365, and US$15,851 and US$34,455, respectively. In multivariable analysis adjusting for socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and liver-disease prognostic indicators, surgical treatment (resection or transplant) was predictive of significantly greater costs compared with ablation at all time points. CONCLUSION. Total and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30-day and 90-day postprocedure periods were lowest for ablation, followed by resection and then transplant. CLINICAL IMPACT. This comprehensive cost analysis could help inform future cost-effectiveness analyses.

Risk Factors for Hospitalization Duration Longer Than 24 Hours Following Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumours

PURPOSE

Prior studies have described complications of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumours. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for hospitalization duration longer than 24 hours following RFA of liver tumours.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre study included patients with liver tumours undergoing RFA between October 2017 and July 2020. Medical records were reviewed to collect patient, tumours, and procedure characteristics for each RFA session. The association between potential risk factors and duration of hospitalization (less than or more than 24 hours) was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Our study included 291 patients (mean age: 65.2 ± 11.2 [standard deviation]; 201 men) undergoing 324 RFA sessions. Sixty-eight sessions (21.0%) resulted in hospitalization of more than 24 hours. Multivariate analysis identified each additional needle insertion per session (OR 1.4; 95% CI [1.1-1.9]; P = .02), RFA performed in segment V (OR 2.8; 95% CI [1.4-5.7]; P = .004), and use of artificial pneumothorax (OR 14.5; 95% CI [1.4-146.0]; P = .02) as potential risk factors. A history of hepatic encephalopathy (OR 2.6; 95% CI [1.1-6.0]; P = .03) was only significant in univariate analysis. Post-hoc, subgroup analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (69.8%) did not identify other risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for a hospitalization duration longer than 24 hours include a higher number of needle insertions per session, radiofrequency ablation in segment V, and use of an artificial pneumothorax.

Complications of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a potentially curative treatment option for early Hepatocellular carcinoma. The RFA is considered safe with a relatively low incidence of complications ranging from 2%-7.9%. Though most of the complications are self-limiting, sometimes they can be life-threatening. The occurrence of the particular complication depends on various factors like tumour location and morphology, underlying disease and ablation technique. A detailed understanding of potential complications along with the associated risk factors will help to employ strategies to prevent them, identify them early and manage them when they occur. This article demonstrates various radiofrequency ablation-related complications and discusses the risk factors and technical strategies to minimise them and achieve complete ablation of the tumour.

Adjuvant holmium-166 radioembolization after radiofrequency ablation in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a dose-finding study (HORA EST HCC trial)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the biodistribution of (super-)selective trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with holmium-166 microspheres (166Ho-MS), when administered as adjuvant therapy after RFA of HCC 2-5 cm. The objective was to establish a treatment volume absorbed dose that results in an absorbed dose of ≥ 120 Gy on the hyperemic zone around the ablation necrosis (i.e., target volume).

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective dose-escalation study in BCLC early stage HCC patients with lesions 2-5 cm, RFA was followed by (super-)selective infusion of 166Ho-MS on day 5-10 after RFA. Dose distribution within the treatment volume was based on SPECT-CT. Cohorts of up to 10 patients were treated with an incremental dose (60 Gy, 90 Gy, 120 Gy) of 166Ho-MS to the treatment volume. The primary endpoint was to obtain a target volume dose of ≥ 120 Gy in 9/10 patients within a cohort.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were treated (male 10; median age, 66.5 years (IQR, [64.3-71.7])) with a median tumor diameter of 2.7 cm (IQR, [2.1-4.0]). At a treatment volume absorbed dose of 90 Gy, the primary endpoint was met with a median absorbed target volume dose of 138 Gy (IQR, [127-145]). No local recurrences were found within 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant (super-)selective infusion of 166Ho-MS after RFA for the treatment of HCC can be administered safely at a dose of 90 Gy to the treatment volume while reaching a dose of ≥ 120 Gy to the target volume and may be a favorable adjuvant therapy for HCC lesions 2-5 cm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03437382 . (registered: 19-02-2018).

Proton Beam Therapy for Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Tumor Invasion: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) has a poor prognosis and is generally not indicated for surgery. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer an alternative treatment. In this study, long-term outcomes were examined in 116 patients (median age 66 years, 100 males) with HCC with advanced PVTT (Vp3 or Vp4) who received PBT from April 2008 to March 2018. Of these patients, 63 received PBT as definitive treatment and 53 as palliative treatment. The representative dose was 72.6 Gy (RBE) in 22 fractions. Eight patients died in follow-up, including 72 due to tumor progression. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 18.0% (95% CI 9.8-26.2%) and the 5-year local control (LC) rate was 86.1% (74.9-97.3%). In multivariate analyses, performance status and treatment strategy were significantly associated with OS. The median follow-up period for survivors with definitive treatment was 33.5 (2-129) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 25.1% (12.9-37.3%) in these cases. The median survival time after definitive irradiation was >20 months. The 5-year OS rate was 9.1% (0-19.7%) for palliative irradiation. These results compare favorably with those of other therapies and suggest that PBT is a useful option for cases of HCC with advanced PVTT that cannot undergo surgery, with an expected survival benefit and good local control. Determining the optimal indication for this treatment is a future challenge.

Different Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes in Transplant-Centre Managed Patients with Early-Stage HCC: Real-World Data from an Australian Multi-Centre Cohort Study

The management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex, with multiple treatment strategies available. There is a paucity of literature regarding variations in the patterns of care and outcomes between transplant and non-transplant centres. We conducted this real-world multi-centre cohort study in two liver cancer referral centres with an integrated liver transplant program and an additional eight non-transplant HCC referral centres across Australia to identify variation in patterns of care and key survival outcomes. Patients with stage Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC, first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, who were managed at a participating site, were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior HCC or if they received upfront liver transplantation. A total of 887 patients were included in the study, with 433 patients managed at a liver cancer centre with a transplant program (LTC) and 454 patients managed at a non-transplant centre (NTC). Management at an LTC did not significantly predict allocation to resection (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11, p = 0.148). However, in those not receiving resection, LTC and NTC patients were systematically managed differently, with LTC patients five times less likely to receive upfront ablation than NTC patients (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.28, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for tumour burden, as well as for age, gender, liver disease aetiology, liver disease severity, and medical comorbidities. LTCs exhibited significantly higher proportions of patients undergoing TACE for every tumour burden category, including those with a single tumour measuring 2 cm or less (p < 0.001). Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, management at a transplant centre was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.98, p = 0.036), and competing-risk regression analysis, considering liver transplant as a competing event, demonstrated a similar reduction in risk (adjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99, p = 0.041), suggesting that the reduced risk of death is not fully explained by higher rates of transplantation. Our study highlights systematic differences in HCC care between large volume liver transplant centres and other sites, which has not previously been well-described. Further work is needed to better define the reasons for differences in treatment allocation and to aim to minimise unwarranted treatment variation to maximise patient outcomes across Australia.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based rim enhancement could effectually predict poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Recent studies have initially shown that MRI-based rim enhancement associates with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, but their sample sizes are small, leading to a necessary of comprehensive analyses to make a relatively solid statement. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to summarize the correlation between MRI-based rim enhancement and prognosis in HCC patients. Until March 2023, a literature search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CNKI, Wangfang, and CQVIP databases in order to identify studies that report the correlation between MRI-based rim enhancement and the prognosis of HCC patients. MRI-based rim enhancement and prognostic data were extracted and analyzed. In our study, eight studies containing 1816 HCC patients were analyzed. Generally, the presence of MRI-based rim enhancement was related to shortened disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.11-3.62, P < 0.001], and worse overall survival (OS) (HR: 5.43, 95% CI: 2.14-13.79, P < 0.001). While no other prognostic data could be retrieved. Funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test all indicated that no publication bias existed; and the risk score by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria ranged from 7-9 points, suggesting a generally low risk of bias. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis showed that the significant findings did not change by omitting each study. Then, subgroup analyses revealed that no matter stratified by tumor size, treatment option, or sample size, rim enhancement was linked with unsatisfied DFS (all P < 0.05). Conclusively, MRI-based rim enhancement could effectually estimate poor survival in HCC patients, indicating its good prognostic value.

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting prognosis in patients with solitary HCC: A TRIPOD-Compliant study

Objective

To develop and validate nomograms for predicting the OS and CSS of patients with Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Using the TRIPOD guidelines, this study identified 5206 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 registry database. All patients were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3 into a training cohort (n = 3646) and a validation cohort (n = 1560), and the Chinese independent cohort (n = 307) constituted the external validation group. The prognosis-related risk factors were selected using univariate Cox regression analysis, and the independent prognostic factors of OS and CSS were identified using the Lasso-Cox regression model. The nomograms for predicting the OS and CSS of the patients were constructed based on the identified prognostic factors. Their prediction ability was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curve in both the training and validation cohorts.

Results

We identified factors that predict OS and CSS and constructed two nomograms based on the data. The ROC analysis, C-index analysis, and calibration analysis indicated that the two nomograms performed well over the 1, 3, and 5-year OS and CSS periods in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, these results were confirmed in the external validation group. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the two nomograms were clinically valuable and superior to the TNM stage system.

Conclusion

We established and validated nomograms to predict 1,3, and 5-year OS and CSS in solitary HCC patients, and our results may also be helpful for clinical decision-making.

Osteosarcopenia impacts treatment outcomes for Barcelona Cancer Liver Classification stage A hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To study the effect of preoperative osteosarcopenia (OSP) on the prognosis of treatment (surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) in patients with Barcelona Cancer Liver Classification stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC A HCC).

METHODS

This study enrolled 102 patients with BCLC A HCC who underwent surgical resection (n = 45) and RFA (n = 57); the patients were divided into two groups: OSP (n = 33) and non-OSP (n = 69). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves for both the groups and treatment methods (surgery and RFA) were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate analyses for OS and DFS were performed using log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed for factors that were significant at univariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that OSP (HR 2.44; 95 % CI 1.30-4.55; p < 0.01) and treatment (HR 0.57; 95 % CI 0.31-0.99; p = 0.05) were significant independent predictors of DFS; and treatment (HR, 0.30; 95 % CI 0.10-0.85; p = 0.03) was a significant independent predictor of OS in the non-OSP group, in which the OS rate was significantly lower in patients treated with RFA than in those treated by resection (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

OSP is a prognostic factor for BCLC A HCC treatment. Surgical approach was associated with a significantly better prognosis in patients without OSP compared to those who underwent RFA.

Transarterial chemoembolization with molecular targeted therapies plus camrelizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization plus molecular targeted therapy (MTT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in primary liver cancer have been demonstrated. However, the evidence for TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is limited. Given the excellent performance of this combination regimen in primary liver cancer, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in RHCC.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients with RHCC treated with TACE plus MTT combined with camrelizumab (TACE-TC group, n = 46) or TACE plus MTT (TACE-T group, n = 42) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for patients with RHCC by analyzing tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), laboratory biochemical indices, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

TACE-TC was superior to TACE-T in PFS (14.0 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.034) and OS (31.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.009). Moreover, TACE-TC achieved more preferable benefits with respect to disease control rate (89.1% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.036) and objective response rate (47.8% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.036) compared with TACE-T in patients with RHCC. Compared with the TACE-T group, the AFP level in the TACE-TC group decreased more significantly after 3 months of treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option was a significant predictor of OS and PFS, while the portal vein tumor thrombus and interval of recurrence from initial treatment were another prognostic factor of PFS. There was no significant difference between the TACE-TC and TACE-T groups for Grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination therapy of TACE, MTT, and camrelizumab significantly improved tumor response and prolonged survival duration, showing a better survival prognosis for RHCC patients.

Treatment options for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm: surgery vs. ablation: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of ablation and surgery in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring ≤5 cm with a large HCC cohort database.

METHODS

The study included consecutive 2,067 patients with solitary HCC who were treated with either ablation (n=1,248) or surgery (n=819). Th e patients were divided into three groups based on the tumor size and compared the outcomes of the two therapies using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

No significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) was found between surgery and ablation groups for tumors measuring ≤2 cm or >2 cm but ≤3 cm. For tumors measuring >3 cm but ≤5 cm, RFS was significantly better with surgery than with ablation (3.6 and 2.0 years, respectively, P=0.0297). However, no significant difference in OS was found between surgery and ablation in this group (6.7 and 6.0 years, respectively, P=0.668).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that surgery and ablation can be equally used as a treatment for solitary HCC no more than 3 cm in diameter. For HCCs measuring 3-5 cm, the OS was not different between therapies; thus, ablation and less invasive therapy can be considered a treatment option; however, special caution should be taken to prevent recurrence.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical resection and ablation for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, specifically in regard to surgical resection (SR) and ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SR and ablation on recurrence and prognosis in early-stage HCC patients, to optimize treatment strategies and improve long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 801 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A HCC and treated with SR or ablation between January 2015 and December 2019. The effectiveness and complications of both treatments were analyzed, and patients were followed up to measure recurrence and survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to increase comparability between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze recurrence and survival, and a Cox risk proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors that affect recurrence and surviva.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both groups, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates better in the SR group than in the ablation group. After PSM, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups. However, the RFS rates were significantly better in the SR group than in the ablation group. The ablation group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the SR group, with shorter treatment times, reduced bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospital costs. Concerning the location of the HCC within the liver, comparable efficacy was observed between SR and ablation for disease located in the noncentral region or left lobe. However, for HCCs located in the central region or right lobe of the liver, SR was more effective than ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed no significant difference in OS between SR and ablation for early-stage HCC, with SR providing better RFS and ablation demonstrating better safety profiles and lower hospital costs. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians in determining optimal treatment strategies for early-stage HCC patients, particularly in terms of balancing efficacy, safety, and cost considerations.

Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan

PURPOSE

A prospective multicenter registry study was started May 2016 in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients who received PBT for HCC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered in the database of the Particle Beam Therapy Committee and Subcommittee of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 755 registered patients, 576 with initial PBT and no duplicate cancer were evaluated. At final follow-up, 322 patients were alive and 254 had died. The median follow-up period for survivors was 39 months (0-58 months). The median OS time of the 576 patients was 48.8 months (95% CI, 42.0-55.6 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 80.5%-86.6%), 68.5% (64.5%-72.2%), 58.2% (53.9%-62.2%), and 50.1% (44.9%-55.0%), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 332 patients, including local recurrence in 45 patients. The median PFS time was 14.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-17.0 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year PFS rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-59.2%), 37.5% (33.5%-41.5%), 30.2% (26.3%-34.2%), and 22.8% (18.5%-27.4%), respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were significantly higher for tumor size <5 versus 5 to 10 cm (P < .001) and <5 versus ≥10 cm (P < .001); Child-Pugh score A/B versus C (P < .001); and distance of the tumor from the gastrointestinal tract <1 versus 1 to 2 cm (P < .008) and <1 versus >2 cm (P < .001). At final follow-up, 27 patients (4.7%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher, with liver failure (n = 7), and dermatitis (n = 7) being most common.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter prospective data registry indicated that PBT for HCC gives good therapeutic effects (3-year local control rate of 90%) with a low risk of severe late adverse events.

Development and evaluation of nomograms and risk stratification systems to predict the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, and patients with HCC have a poor prognosis and low survival rates. Establishing a prognostic nomogram is important for predicting the survival of patients with HCC, as it helps to improve the patient's prognosis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate nomograms and risk stratification to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in HCC patients. Data from 10,302 patients with initially diagnosed HCC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were randomly divided into the training and validation set. Kaplan-Meier survival, LASSO regression, and Cox regression analysis were conducted to select the predictors of OS. Competing risk analysis, LASSO regression, and Cox regression analysis were conducted to select the predictors of CSS. The validation of the nomograms was performed using the concordance index (C-index), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Net Reclassification Index (NRI), Discrimination Improvement (IDI), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). The results indicated that factors including age, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, surgery to lymph node (LN), Alpha-Fetal Protein (AFP), and tumor size were independent predictors of OS, whereas grade, T stage, surgery, AFP, tumor size, and distant lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of CSS. Based on these factors, predictive models were built and virtualized by nomograms. The C-index for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.788, 0.792, and 0.790. The C-index for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS were 0.803, 0.808, and 0.806. AIC, BIC, NRI, and IDI suggested that nomograms had an excellent predictive performance with no significant overfitting. The calibration curves showed good consistency of OS and CSS between the actual observation and nomograms prediction, and the DCA showed great clinical usefulness of the nomograms. The risk stratification of OS and CSS was built that could perfectly classify HCC patients into three risk groups. Our study developed nomograms and a corresponding risk stratification system predicting the OS and CSS of HCC patients. These tools can assist in patient counseling and guiding treatment decision making.

Comparison of liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in long-term survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies

BACKGROUND

Whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver resection (LR) are comparable treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We conducted this study to provide ample clinical evidence for the argument.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies that compared long-term outcomes of both RFA and LR for patients with early-stage HCC. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies consisting of six RCTs and 30 PSM studies were included in this study, and a total of 7384 patients were involved, with 3694 patients being treated with LR and 3690 patients with RFA. Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS than RFA (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.31; HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.39-1.74, respectively). A sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable. For the subgroup of patients with BCLC 0 stage, RFA and LR resulted in similar OS and DFS. For the subgroup of patients with single tumor sizes less than 3 cm, RFA reached similar OS (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.90-1.58) but worse DFS compared with LR (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11-1.90). For the subgroup of ablation margin larger than 0.5 cm, LR still resulted in better OS than RFA (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09-1.53); while the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm, both RFA and LR resulted in similar OS. The modality of RFA was also a factor that affected results. Subgroup analysis showed that patients receiving ultrasound-guided RFA had worse OS and DFS than LR (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.36; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.25-1.66, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS for patients with early-stage HCC. However, RFA and LR had similar effects on long-term survival in patients with BCLC 0 stage HCC. RFA and LR probably had similar effects on OS in patients with solitary HCC less than 3 cm or when the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm which need more studies to confirm. The effects of different modalities of RFA on long-term survival are needed for further assessment.

Cryoablation in the liver: how accurately does the iceball predict the ablation zone?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy with which the iceball predicts the realized ablation zone in patients undergoing cryoablation of the liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Continuous patients who underwent cryoablation of primary or secondary malignancies of the liver were retrospectively reviewed. Iceball and ablation zone dimensions on 1 month follow up imaging were collected in three orientations, the long axis (LA), perpendicular transverse (PTR), and perpendicular craniocaudal (PCC). Factors which may predict differences in the measurements were evaluated with regression analysis. Oncologic outcomes were also collected.

RESULTS

The mean size of the iceball was 5.5 ± 1.1 cm, 3.9 ± 1.1 cm, and 4.4 ± 1.4 cm in the LA, PTR, and PCC orientations, respectively. The mean size of the one-month ablation cavity was 4.3 ± 1.3 cm, 3 ± 1.1 cm, and 3 ± 1.3 cm in the LA, PTR, and PCC orientations, respectively. The iceball was significantly larger than the ablation zone in all orientations (p < 0.001). When comparing HCC and non-HCC patients the Kaplan-Meier analysis of TTLP, the Kaplan Meier curves deviated significantly (p = 0.015, HR 2.26 (95%CI 1.17-4.37)). When a similar analysis was performed looking at TTP again the curves diverged significantly (p = 0.002, HR 2.4 (95%CI 1.37-4.19)).

CONCLUSION

The iceball seems to overestimate the realized ablation zone by about 1 cm in all orientations during hepatic cryoablation.

Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of high difficulty score is technically challenging. There is a lack of clinical evidence to support its applicability in terms of the long-term survival benefits. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between LLR and the open liver resection of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, using Iwate criteria, 424 patients underwent liver resection of high difficulty score by the laparoscopic (n = 65) or open (n = 359) approach. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed between the two groups. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between PS-matched groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic group had significantly fewer severe complications (3% vs. 10.8%), and shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 8 days) than the open group. Meanwhile, the long-term oncological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, in terms of the tumor recurrence rate (40% vs. 46.1%), the 5-year overall survival rate (75.4% vs. 76.2%), and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (50.3% vs. 53.5%). The high preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein level, multiple tumors, and severe postoperative complications were the independent poor prognostic factors associated with worse overall survival. The surgical approach (Laparoscopic vs. Open) did not influence the survival.

CONCLUSION

LLR of high difficulty score for selected patients with HCC has better short-term outcomes than the open approach. More importantly, it can achieve similar long-term survival outcomes as the open approach.

Identification and validation of an H2AZ1-based index model: a novel prognostic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma

The H2A.Z variant histone 1 (H2AZ1) is aberrantly expressed in various tumors, correlating with an unfavorable prognosis. However, its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the pathways affected by H2AZ1 and identify promising therapeutic targets for HCC. Following bioinformatic analysis of gene expression and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus database, we found 6,344 dysregulated genes related to H2AZ1 overexpression in HCC tissues (P < 0.05). We performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify the gene module most related to H2AZ1. The H2AZ1-based index was further developed using Cox regression analysis, which revealed that the poor prognosis in the high H2AZ1-based index group could be attributed to elevated tumor stemness (P < 0.05). Moreover, the clinical model showed good prognostic potential (AUC > 0.7). We found that H2AZ1 knockdown led to reduced superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and increased apoptosis rate in tumor cells (P < 0.001). Thus, we developed an H2AZ1-based index model with the potential to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC. Our findings provide initial evidence that H2AZ1 overexpression plays a pivotal role in HCC initiation and progression.

Laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for caudate lobe solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of the hepatic caudate lobe.

METHODS

Patients with hepatic caudate lobe HCC who underwent LLR or RFA at three hospitals in China between February 2015 and February 2021 were included. In total, 112 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 52 underwent RFA and 60 underwent LLR. The outcomes of the two groups were compared and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) method.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, HBV/HCV positivity, AFP positivity (>100 ng/mL), tumor position, Child-Pugh score, or preoperative liver function tests (ALT, AST, TBIL, ALB, and PT) (p > 0.05). Compared to the LLR group, the RFA group had a shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in overall postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). Despite the larger tumor size, the LLR group had better postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.00027) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0023) than the RFA group. After one-to-one PSM, 31 LLR patients and 31 RFA patients were selected for further analyses. The advantages of LLR over RFA were observed in terms of RFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.00029).

CONCLUSION

LLR should probably be recommended as the preferred method for solitary caudate lobe HCC.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2023: Italian practice Treatment Guidelines of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery (AICEP), Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO), Italian Association of Radiology and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), Italian Society of Pathological Anatomy and Diagnostic Cytology (SIAPeC-IAP), Italian Society of Surgery (SIC), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), Italian Organ Transplant Society (SITO), and Association of Patients with Hepatitis and Liver Disease (EpaC) - Part I - Surgical treatments

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of HCC management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the first part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and surgical treatments of HCC.

Radiation Segmentectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90, historically a palliative treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is evolving. Radiation segmentectomy (RADSEG), the segmental delivery of an ablative radiation dose, is a treatment option for patients with earlier-stage HCC. This review presents an in-depth exploration of RADSEG, emphasizing its technical considerations, dosimetry advancements, and patient selection. The integration of RADSEG into the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) paradigm will be highlighted. RADSEG outcomes concerning safety and efficacy will be explored and compared with traditional locoregional cancer treatments like trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous thermal ablation, and surgical resection, with an eye on future directions and considerations.

LI-RADS category is associated with treatment outcomes of small single HCC: surgical resection vs. radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category is associated with the treatment outcomes of small single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 357 patients who underwent SR (n = 209) or RFA (n = 148) for a single HCC of ≤ 3 cm between 2014 and 2016. LI-RADS categories were assigned. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates after treatment were compared according to the LI-RADS category (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors for treatment outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 357 patients (mean age, 59 years; men, 272) with 357 HCCs (294 LR-4/5 and 63 LR-M) were included. After PSM (n = 78 in each treatment group), there were 10 and 11 LR-M HCCs in the SR and RFA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or RFS. However, SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA (1.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.001). SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for LR-M HCCs (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and LR-4/5 HCCs (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

LI-RADS classification is associated with the treatment outcome of HCC, supporting favorable outcomes of SR over RFA for LTP, especially for HCCs categorized as LR-M.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category has a potential prognostic role, supporting favorable outcomes of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation for local tumor progression, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma categorized as LR-M.

KEY POINTS

• SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for HCCs categorized as LR-M (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and HCCs categorized as LR-4/5 (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). • There is a steeply increased risk of LTP within 1 year after RFA for LR-M HCCs, compared to SR. • The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (HR 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032) in patients with HCC of ≤ 3 cm treated with SR or RFA.