1
|
Ng KTP, Pang L, Wang JQ, She WH, Tsang SHY, Lo CM, Man K, Cheung TT. Indications of pro-inflammatory cytokines in laparoscopic and open liver resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:257-264. [PMID: 37903711 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our clinical practice of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) had achieved better short-term and long-term benefits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over open liver resection (OLR), but the underlying mechanisms are not clear. This study was to find out whether systemic inflammation plays an important role. METHODS A total of 103 patients with early-stage HCC under liver resection were enrolled (LLR group, n = 53; OLR group, n = 50). The expression of 9 inflammatory cytokines in patients at preoperation, postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD7 was quantified by Luminex Multiplex assay. The relationships of the cytokines and the postoperative outcomes were compared between LLR and OLR. RESULTS Seven of the circulating cytokines were found to be significantly upregulated on POD1 after LLR or OLR compared to their preoperative levels. Compared to OLR, the POD1 levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the LLR group were significantly lower. Higher POD1 levels of these cytokines were significantly correlated with longer operative time and higher volume of blood loss during operation. The levels of these cytokines were positively associated with postoperative liver injury, and the length of hospital stay. Importantly, a high level of IL-6 at POD1 was a risk factor for HCC recurrence and poor disease-free survival after liver resection. CONCLUSIONS Significantly lower level of GM-CSF, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 after liver resection represented a milder systemic inflammation which might be an important mechanism to offer better short-term and long-term outcomes in LLR over OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Tak-Pan Ng
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Li Pang
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jia-Qi Wang
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wong Hoi She
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Simon Hing-Yin Tsang
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chung Mau Lo
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kwan Man
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, HKU-SZH & School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Birgin E, Abdelhadi S, Seyfried S, Rasbach E, Rahbari M, Téoule P, Reißfelder C, Rahbari NN. Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1296-1305. [PMID: 38102396 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10645-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat hepatectomies are technically complex procedures. The evidence of robotic or laparoscopic (= minimally invasive) repeat hepatectomies (MIRH) after previous open hepatectomy is poor. Therefore, we compared postoperative outcomes of MIRH vs open repeat hepatectomies (ORH) in patients with liver tumors after previous open liver resections. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent repeat hepatectomies after open liver resections were identified from a prospective database between April 2018 and May 2023. Postoperative complications were graded in line with the Clavien-Dindo classification. We stratified patients by intention to treat into MIRH or ORH and compared outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to define variables associated with the utilization of a minimally invasive approach. RESULTS Among 46 patients included, 20 (43%) underwent MIRH and 26 (57%) ORH. Twenty-seven patients had advanced or expert repeat hepatectomies (59%) according to the IWATE criteria. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The use of a minimally invasive approach was not dependent on preoperative or intraoperative variables. All patients had negative resection margins on final histology. MIRH was associated with less blood loss (450 ml, IQR (interquartile range): 200-600 vs 600 ml, IQR: 400-1500 ml, P = 0.032), and shorter length of stay (5 days, IQR: 4-7 vs 7 days, IQR: 5-9 days, P = 0.041). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (P = 0.298). CONCLUSIONS MIRH is feasible after previous open hepatectomy and a safe alternative approach to ORH. (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00032183).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Schaima Abdelhadi
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mohammad Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vivarelli M, Mocchegiani F, Wakabayashi T, Gaudenzi F, Nicolini D, Al-Omari MA, Conte G, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Rossi R, Fujiyama Y, Giovagnoni A, Wakabayashi G, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A. Prevention of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for HCC: Has the Round Ligament to Be Preserved? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:364. [PMID: 38254855 PMCID: PMC10814940 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. The factors related to PHLF are represented not only by the volume and function of the future liver remnant but also by the severity of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess whether the preservation of the round ligament (RL) may mitigate portal hypertension, thus decreasing the risk of PHLF and ascites in cirrhotic patients while undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). All the cirrhotic patients who underwent MILS for HCC from 2016 to 2021 in two international tertiary referral centers were retrospectively analyzed, comparing cases with the RL preserved vs. those with the RL divided. Only patients with cirrhosis ≥ Child A6, portal hypertension, and ICG-R15 > 10% were included. Main postoperative outcomes were compared, and the risk factors for postoperative ascites (severe PHLF, grade B/C) were investigated through a logistic regression. After the application of the selection criteria, a total of 130 MILS patients were identified, with 86 patients with the RL preserved and 44 with the RL divided. The RL-preserved group showed lower incidences of severe PHLF (7.0% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.023) and ascites (5.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.026) in comparison with the RL-divided group. After uni/multivariate analysis, the risk factors related to postoperative ascites were RL division and platelets < 92 × 103/µL, calculated with ROC analysis. The preservation of the round ligament during MILS may mitigate portal hypertension, preventing PHLF and ascites in cirrhotic patients with borderline liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vivarelli
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Federico Gaudenzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Daniele Nicolini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Malek A. Al-Omari
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Grazia Conte
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberta Rossi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Yoshiki Fujiyama
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doi S, Yasuda S, Hokuto D, Kamitani N, Matsuo Y, Sakata T, Nishiwada S, Nagai M, Nakamura K, Terai T, Kohara Y, Sho M. Impact of the Prolonged Intermittent Pringle Maneuver on Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure: Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Approaches. World J Surg 2023; 47:3328-3337. [PMID: 37787778 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of prolonged intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of the prolonged IPM on PHLF in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. METHODS We retrospectively included 546 patients who underwent hepatectomy using IPM. The patients were divided into open (n = 294) and laparoscopic (n = 252) groups. Odds ratios for PHLF occurrence were estimated in each group according to cumulative Pringle time (CPT). The cut-off value was set at CPT of 120 min. Risk factors for PHLF were evaluated in the open and laparoscopic groups. Additionally, we analyzed the post-operative outcomes in the open and laparoscopic groups with CPT ≥ 120 min and performed propensity score matching analysis based on PFLF-associated factors. RESULTS In the open group, the risk of PHLF increased as CPT increased, particularly after 120 min. However, in the laparoscopic group, PHLF did not occur at less than 60 min, and the risk of PHLF was not significantly different at more than 60 min. Multivariate analysis identified CPT ≥ 120 min as an independent risk factor for PHLF in the open group (p < 0.001), but not in the laparoscopic group. Propensity score matching analysis showed that the PHLF rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group with CPT ≥ 120 min (p = 0.027). The post-operative transaminase levels were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group with CPT ≥ 120 min. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic hepatectomy may cause less PHLF with prolonged IPM compared with open hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Doi
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Naoki Kamitani
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sakata
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nishiwada
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kota Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Kohara
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berardi G, Ivanics T, Sapisochin G, Ratti F, Sposito C, Nebbia M, D'Souza DM, Pascual F, Tohme S, D'Amico FE, Alessandris R, Panetta V, Simonelli I, Del Basso C, Russolillo N, Fiorentini G, Serenari M, Rotellar F, Zimitti G, Famularo S, Hoffman D, Onkendi E, Lopez-Ben S, Caula C, Rompianesi G, Chopra A, Abu Hilal M, Torzilli G, Corvera C, Alseidi A, Helton S, Troisi RI, Simo K, Conrad C, Cescon M, Cleary S, Kwon CHD, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cillo U, Geller D, Cherqui D, Serrano PE, Ferrone C, Mazzaferro V, Aldrighetti L, Kingham TP. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1041-e1047. [PMID: 36994755 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare minimally invasive (MILR) and open liver resections (OLRs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). BACKGROUND Liver resections for HCC on MS are associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. No data on the minimally invasive approach in this setting exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicenter study involving 24 institutions was conducted. Propensity scores were calculated, and inverse probability weighting was used to weight comparisons. Short-term and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS A total of 996 patients were included: 580 in OLR and 416 in MILR. After weighing, groups were well matched. Blood loss was similar between groups (OLR 275.9±3.1 vs MILR 226±4.0, P =0.146). There were no significant differences in 90-day morbidity (38.9% vs 31.9% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.08) and mortality (2.4% vs 2.2% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.84). MILRs were associated with lower rates of major complications (9.3% vs 15.3%, P =0.015), posthepatectomy liver failure (0.6% vs 4.3%, P =0.008), and bile leaks (2.2% vs 6.4%, P =0.003); ascites was significantly lower at postoperative day 1 (2.7% vs 8.1%, P =0.002) and day 3 (3.1% vs 11.4%, P <0.001); hospital stay was significantly shorter (5.8±1.9 vs 7.5±1.7, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS MILR for HCC on MS is associated with equivalent perioperative and oncological outcomes to OLRs. Fewer major complications, posthepatectomy liver failures, ascites, and bile leaks can be obtained, with a shorter hospital stay. The combination of lower short-term severe morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes favor MILR for MS when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Francesca Ratti
- Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Nebbia
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel M D'Souza
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Valentina Panetta
- L'altrastatistica Consultancy and Training, Biostatistics Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Simonelli
- L'altrastatistica Consultancy and Training, Biostatistics Department, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Matteo Serenari
- Hepatobiliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Zimitti
- Department of surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Simone Famularo
- Department of General Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Edwin Onkendi
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Celia Caula
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Naples
| | | | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of General Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlos Corvera
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Scott Helton
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Naples
| | - Kerri Simo
- Department of Surgery, Promedica Toledo, Toledo, OH
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sean Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | | | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Pablo E Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Milan, Italy
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Masuda T, Endo Y, Amano S, Kawamura M, Fujinaga A, Kawasaki T, Kawano Y, Hirashita T, Ohta M, Inomata M. Appropriate indications for laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy. BMC Surg 2023; 23:322. [PMID: 37875912 PMCID: PMC10594730 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02208-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) has increased, but appropriate indications for LRH are unclear. This study aimed to clarify appropriate indications for LRH. METHODS We retrospectively compared surgical outcomes between open RH (ORH) (n = 57) and LRH (n = 40) groups. To detect difficult cases of complete pure LRH, we examined patients with unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS)/open conversion (n = 6). RESULTS In the LRH versus ORH group, as previous hepatectomy, laparoscopic (75% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (73% vs. 37%, p = 0.002) were more frequently performed, and as RH procedure, partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (88% vs. 47%, p = 0.0002) was more frequently performed. S1 tumor cases were higher in ORH group (11% vs. 0%), but S2-6 cases were higher in LRH group (73% vs. 49%) (p = 0.02). In LRH group, compared to the pure LRH patients, HALS/open conversion patients underwent significantly more previous hepatectomy with more than lobectomy (Hr2-3) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.033) and more RH procedures with segmentectomy (HrS) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03). All LRH requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach were HALS conversions. CONCLUSION Appropriate indications for LRH were previous hepatectomy was laparoscopic partial hepatectomy (Hr0), and RH procedure was partial hepatectomy (Hr0) for S2-6 tumor location. When RH is more than segmentectomy (HrS) requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach, planned HALS or ORH may be a better approach than pure LRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Masuda
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
| | - Yuichi Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Shota Amano
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kawamura
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Atsuro Fujinaga
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Takahide Kawasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Yoko Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Teijiro Hirashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ratti F, Ferrero A, Guglielmi A, Cillo U, Giuliante F, Mazzaferro V, De Carlis L, Ettorre GM, Gruttadauria S, Di Benedetto F, Ercolani G, Valle RD, Belli A, Jovine E, Ravaioli M, Aldrighetti L. Ten years of Italian mini-invasiveness: the I Go MILS registry as a tool of dissemination, characterization and networking. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1457-1469. [PMID: 37488408 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01597-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Purposes of this study are to evaluate the main changes that have occurred in the Italian MILS activity in the last decade in terms of indications, approaches and outcomes as reported in the national registry and to provide specific details on the main areas of development of MILS. Data from patients undergoing minimally invasive liver resections at centers included in the I Go MILS Registry from its start-up (November 2014) to March 2023 were analyzed for the purposes of this study. The registry is intention-to-treat and prospective. Global recruitment trends stratified by indication to surgery and type of approach were analysed. 7413 MILS procedures were performed across all centers (median number of procedures per center: 63). Years (2020-2023) displayed a significantly higher proportion of treated patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (38.2% vs. 28.9% and 33.9%, p < 0.001) and cholangiocarcinoma (6.7% vs. 6.5% and 4.2%, p < 0.001) compared to the preceding triennial periods. Additionally, technical complexity demonstrated an increased prominence in Years (2019-2023) with a significantly higher percentage of grade III cases compared to the earlier periods (39.3% vs. 21.7% and 25.6%, p < 0.001). Annual case trends focusing on laparoscopic and robotic techniques demonstrated a steadily increase in the use of these techniques for complex case mix of indications. Overall, attitude and attention to MILS approach has evolved, so that currently indications to hepatic mini-invasiveness have expanded and surgical technique has been refined: Areas mainly involved in increasing growth trends are hepatocellular carcinoma, possible applications of MILS in transplant setting, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and robotic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2-Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morise Z. Editorial (Preface) for the Special Issue on Advances in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Cancer Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3520. [PMID: 37444631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
After the initial reports of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the early 1990s, minimally invasive liver resection has been rapidly developing based on technical and instrumental improvements [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, 1 Gotanda Harisakicho, Okazaki 444-0827, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xiang ZQ, Zhu FF, Zhao SQ, Li HJ, Long ZT, Wang Q, Dai XM, Zhu Z. Laparoscopic versus open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched cohort studies. Int J Surg 2023; 109:963-971. [PMID: 36999779 PMCID: PMC10389376 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effectiveness of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) versus open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is unclear. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes of LRH and ORH in patients with RHCC with a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords until 30 September 2022. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI was used for the analysis of continuous variables; odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used for binary variables; and hazard ratio with 95% CI was used for survival analysis. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies with 818 patients were included; 409 patients (50%) were treated with LRH and 409 (50%) with ORH. In most surgical outcomes, LRH was superior to ORH: less estimated blood loss, shorter operation time, lower major complication rate, and shorter length of hospital stay (MD=-225.9, 95% CI=[-360.8 to -91.06], P =0.001; MD=66.2, 95% CI=[5.28-127.1], P =0.03; OR=0.18, 95% CI=[0.05-0.57], P =0.004; MD=-6.22, 95% CI=[-9.78 to -2.67], P =0.0006). There were no significant differences in the remaining surgical outcomes: blood transfusion rate and overall complication rate. In oncological outcomes, LRH and ORH were not significantly different in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS For patients with RHCC, most surgical outcomes with LRH were superior to those of ORH, but oncological outcomes with the two operations were similar. LRH may be a preferable option for the treatment of RHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Si-Qi Zhao
- Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhu Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Department of Education and Training, The First Affiliated Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nomi T, Kaibori M, Tanaka S, Hirokawa F, Hokuto D, Noda T, Ueno M, Nakai T, Ikoma H, Iida H, Matsui K, Komeda K, Hayami S, Eguchi H, Matsumoto M, Morimura R, Maehira H, Yoshikawa T, Kubo S. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:283-292. [PMID: 35918904 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicenter study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LRLR) versus open repeat liver resection (ORLR) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score matching (PSM). Despite the expanding indications for laparoscopic liver resection, limited data regarding the outcomes of LRLR have previously been reported. METHODS This study included patients who underwent repeat liver resection for recurrent HCC. Patients were divided into the LRLR and ORLR groups, and their short- and long-term outcomes were compared via PSM. RESULTS There were 256 and 130 patients in the ORLR and LRLR groups, respectively. After PSM, 64 patients were included in each group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in LRLR than in ORLR (56 vs 208 ml, P < .001). Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo IIIa or more were significantly less in LRLR than in ORLR (3.1% vs 15.6%, P = .030). The length of hospital stay was notably shorter in LRLR than in ORLR (9 vs 12 days, P < .001). Survival rates after repeat liver resection at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, were comparable at 93.4%, 81.9%, and 63.5% for ORLR and at 94.8%, 80.7%, and 67.3% for LRLR (P = .623). Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent wedge resection in repeat liver resection revealed that the postoperative complication rate was notably lower in LRLR than in ORLR (7.2% vs 21.8%, P = .030). CONCLUSION LRLR for recurrent HCC is a viable option due to its better short-term outcomes and comparable long-term outcomes compared to ORLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeo Nomi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Uji Tokusyukai Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Masaki Kaibori
- Department of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shogo Tanaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumitoshi Hirokawa
- Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Nakai
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hisashi Ikoma
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroya Iida
- Division of Gastrointestinal, Breast, and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Kosuke Matsui
- Department of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Komeda
- Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinya Hayami
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masataka Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryo Morimura
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Maehira
- Division of Gastrointestinal, Breast, and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | | | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Challenging Scenarios and Debated Indications for Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051493. [PMID: 36900284 PMCID: PMC10001345 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) have been increasingly adopted for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with safe short- and long-term outcomes reported worldwide. Despite this, lesions in the posterosuperior segments, large and recurrent tumors, portal hypertension, and advanced cirrhosis currently represent challenging scenarios in which the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic approach are still controversial. In this systematic review, we pooled the available evidence on the short-term outcomes of LLRs for HCC in challenging clinical scenarios. All randomized and non-randomized studies reporting LLRs for HCC in the above-mentioned settings were included. The literature search was run in the Scopus, WoS, and Pubmed databases. Case reports, reviews, meta-analyses, studies including fewer than 10 patients, non-English language studies, and studies analyzing histology other than HCC were excluded. From 566 articles, 36 studies dated between 2006 and 2022 fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. A total of 1859 patients were included, of whom 156 had advanced cirrhosis, 194 had portal hypertension, 436 had large HCCs, 477 had lesions located in the posterosuperior segments, and 596 had recurrent HCCs. Overall, the conversion rate ranged between 4.6% and 15.5%. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0.0% and 5.1%, and 18.6% and 34.6%, respectively. Full results according to subgroups are described in the study. Advanced cirrhosis and portal hypertension, large and recurrent tumors, and lesions located in the posterosuperior segments are challenging clinical scenarios that should be carefully approached by laparoscopy. Safe short-term outcomes can be achieved provided experienced surgeons and high-volume centers.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cipriani F, Ratti F, Fornoni G, Marino R, Tudisco A, Catena M, Aldrighetti L. Conversion of Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for HCC in Advanced Cirrhosis: Clinical Impact and Role of Difficulty Scoring Systems. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051432. [PMID: 36900223 PMCID: PMC10001094 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) in cirrhosis are at risk of conversion since cirrhosis and complexity, which can be estimated by scoring systems, are both independent factors for. We aimed to investigate the consequence of conversion of MILR for hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced cirrhosis. METHODS After retrospective review, MILRs for HCC were divided into preserved liver function (Cohort-A) and advanced cirrhosis cohorts (Cohort-B). Completed and converted MILRs were compared (Compl-A vs. Conv-A and Compl-B vs. Conv-B); then, converted patients were compared (Conv-A vs. Conv-B) as whole cohorts and after stratification for MILR difficulty using Iwate criteria. RESULTS 637 MILRs were studied (474 Cohort-A, 163 Cohort-B). Conv-A MILRs had worse outcomes than Compl-A: more blood loss; higher incidence of transfusions, morbidity, grade 2 complications, ascites, liver failure and longer hospitalization. Conv-B MILRs exhibited the same worse perioperative outcomes than Compl-B and also higher incidence of grade 1 complications. Conv-A and Conv-B outcomes of low difficulty MILRs resulted in similar perioperative outcomes, whereas the comparison of more difficult converted MILRs (intermediate/advanced/expert) resulted in several worse perioperative outcomes for patients with advanced cirrhosis. However, Conv-A and Conv-B outcomes were not significantly different in the whole cohort where "advanced/expert" MILRs were 33.1% and 5.5% in Cohort A and B. CONCLUSIONS Conversion in the setting of advanced cirrhosis can be associated with non-inferior outcomes compared to compensated cirrhosis, provided careful patient selection is applied (patients elected to low difficulty MILRs). Difficulty scoring systems may help in identifying the most appropriate candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Fornoni
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Rebecca Marino
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Tudisco
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tanaka S, Kubo S, Ishizawa T. Positioning of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Laparoscopic to Robot-Assisted Liver Resection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020488. [PMID: 36672437 PMCID: PMC9856586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is widely accepted in the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through international consensus conferences and the development of difficulty classifications. LLR has been reported to result in earlier postoperative recovery and fewer postoperative complications than open liver resection (OLR) for HCC. However, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis, obesity, the elderly, HCC recurrence (repeat liver resection), and major resection must be considered for LLR for HCC. Some systematic reviews, meta-analysis studies, and large cohort studies indicated that LLR is technically feasible for selected patients with HCC with these factors that led to less intraoperative blood loss, fewer transfusions and postoperative complication incidences, and shorter hospital stays than OLR. Furthermore, some reported LLR prevents postoperative loss of independence. No difference was reported in long-term outcomes among patients with HCC who underwent LLR and OLR; however, some recent reports indicated better long-term outcomes with LLR. In recent years, robot-assisted liver resection (RALR) has gradually become popular, and its short- and long-term results for HCC are not different from those of LLR. Additionally, RALR is expected to become the mainstay of minimally invasive surgery in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogo Tanaka
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-6-6645-3841; Fax: +81-6-6646-6057
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection-Selecting the Best Approach for Repeat Liver Resection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020421. [PMID: 36672369 PMCID: PMC9857037 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrence of liver cancers after liver resection (LR), such as recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases, is often treated with repeat LR (RLR) as the only curative treatment. However, RLR is associated with an increased risk of complications. The indications for the currently emerging laparoscopic LR and its advantages and disadvantages for repeat treatment are still under discussion. Our multi-institutional propensity-score matched analyses of laparoscopic vs. open RLRs for hepatocellular carcinoma showed the feasibility of laparoscopic RLR with comparable short- and long-term outcomes. Small blood loss and low morbidity was observed in selected patients treated using laparoscopic RLR in which total adhesiolysis can be dodged, with speculations that laparoscopic minor repeated LR can minimize functional deterioration of the liver. However, there are several disadvantages, such as easily occurring disorientation and difficulty in repeated wide-range dissection of Glissonian pedicles. Recently emerging small anatomical resection, indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery, and robot-assisted surgery are promising tools for the further development of laparoscopic RLR. This review discusses how laparoscopic RLR, as a powerful unique local therapy causing less damage to the residual liver and surrounding structures, could contribute to the outcomes of repeated treatments for cancers and its future perspectives.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lv TR, Hu HJ, Ma WJ, Hu YF, Dai YS, Li FY. The role of laparoscopic surgery in the surgical management of recurrent liver malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 9:1042458. [PMID: 36684258 PMCID: PMC9852625 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1042458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficiency of laparoscopic surgery in treating recurrent liver tumors vs. conventional open surgery. Methods Database searching was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE. Rev Man 5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were applied in statistical analyses. Results A total of fourteen studies were finally included with 1,284 patients receiving LRH and 2,254 with ORH. LRH was associated with less intraoperative hemorrhage, a higher R0 resection rate, a lower incidence of Pringle Maneuver, a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities, a better overall survival and an enhanced postoperative recovery vs. ORH. Patients receiving LRH shared similar operative time, tumor number and disease-free survival as those with ORH. However, tumor size was relatively larger in patients receiving ORH and major hepatectomy, anatomic hepatectomy were rarely performed in patients with LRH. Additional analyses between LRH and laparoscopic primary hepatectomy revealed less intraoperative blood loss in patients with LRH. Conclusion LRH is safe and feasible with more favorable peri-operative outcomes and faster postoperative recovery. However, it is only applicable for some highly-selected cases not requiring complex surgical procedures. Future larger well-designed studies are expected for further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Fu-Yu Li
- Correspondence: Fu-Yu Li lfy_74 @hotmail.com
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morise Z. Current status of minimally invasive liver surgery for cancers. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6090-6098. [PMID: 36483154 PMCID: PMC9724486 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have chronic liver disease with functional deterioration and multicentric oncogenicity. Liver surgeries for the patients should be planned on both oncological effects and sparing liver function. In colorectal patients with post-chemotherapy liver injury and multiple bilateral tumors, handling multiple tumors in a fragile/easy-to-bleed liver is an important issue. Liver surgery for biliary tract cancers is often performed as a resection of large-volume functioning liver with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction. Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for HCC is applied with the advantages of laparoscopic for cases of cirrhosis or repeat resections. Small anatomical resections using the Glissonian, indocyanine green-guided, and hepatic vein-guided approaches are under discussion. In many cases of colorectal liver metastases, MILS is applied combined with chemotherapy owing to its advantage of better hemostasis. Two-stage hepatectomy and indocyanine green-guided tumor identification for multiple bilateral tumors are under discussion. In the case of biliary tract cancers, MILS with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction are developing. A robot-assisted procedure for dissection of major vessels and handling fragile livers may have advantages, and well-simulated robot-assisted procedure may decrease the difficulty for biliary tract cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki 444-0827, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hao F, Li H, Li N, Li J, Wu H. Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy versus conventional open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:960204. [PMID: 36185273 PMCID: PMC9521539 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Repeat hepatectomy has been proven to be an effective treatment in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC). However, for RHCC, it is still controversial whether laparoscopic hepatectomy is superior to conventional ones. The present meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the safety and overall effect of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) to open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) for patients with RHCC. Methods A meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42021257569. PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched based on a defined search strategy to identify eligible studies before 25 April 2022. Data on operative times, bleeding volume, overall complications, 90-day mortality, blood transfusion, length of stay, overall survival rate, and long-term recurrence-free survival rate were subjected to meta-analysis. Results Overall, we identified nine studies of LRH versus ORH enrolling a total of 945 patients (460 and 485 underwent LRH and ORH, respectively). The present meta-analysis revealed non-significant differences in operative time, blood transfusion, overall complications, 90-day mortality, 3-year overall survival rate, 5-year overall survival rate, and long-term recurrence-free survival rate between the two groups. Alternatively, comparing LRH with ORH, LRH has less bleeding volume (p < 0.001) and a shorter length of stay (p = 0.005). Conclusion LRH is a feasible and effective treatment strategy for RHCC. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#searchadvanced, identifier CRD42021257569.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulong Hao
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining First People’s Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Hancong Li
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Li
- Engineering Research Centre of Medical Information Technology, Ministry of Education, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Information Technology Centre, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Hong Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mori S, Mishima K, Ozaki T, Fujiyama Y, Wakabayashi G. Short-term Outcomes and Difficulty of Repeat Laparoscopic Liver Resection. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e191. [PMID: 37601155 PMCID: PMC10431396 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the feasibility of repeat laparoscopic liver resection (Rep-LLR), including repeat anatomical resection (Rep-AR), as compared to initial-LLR (Ini-LLR). Background The indications of LLR have expanded to treatment of recurrent liver tumors. However, the feasibility of Rep-LLR, including Rep-AR, has not yet been adequately assessed. Methods Data of 297 patients who had undergone LLR were reviewed. Among the 297 patients, 235 (AR: 168) had undergone Ini-LLR and 62 (AR: 27) had undergone Rep-LLR, and the surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of the difficulty of Rep-LLR based on the operation time and volume of blood loss. Results Of the 62 patients who had undergone Rep-LLR, 44, 14, and 4 had undergone second, third, and fourth repeat LRs, respectively. No significant intergroup differences were observed in regard to the operation time, blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, postoperative morbidity, or postoperative hospital stay. However, the proportion of patients in whom the Pringle maneuver was used was significantly lower in the Rep-LLR group than in the Ini-LLR group. Multivariate analysis identified surgical procedure ≥sectionectomy at the initial/previous LR and an IWATE difficulty score of ≥6 as being independent predictors of the difficulty of Rep-LLR. Use of adhesion barriers at the initial/previous LR was associated with a decreased risk of failure to perform the Pringle maneuver during Rep-LLR. Conclusions Rep-LLR can offer outcomes comparable to those of Ini-LLR over the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shozo Mori
- From the Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kohei Mishima
- From the Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ozaki
- From the Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Fujiyama
- From the Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- From the Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Endo T, Morise Z, Katsuno H, Kikuchi K, Matsuo K, Asano Y, Horiguchi A. Caudal Approach to Laparoscopic Liver Resection—Conceptual Benefits for Repeated Multimodal Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Extended Right Posterior Sectionectomy in the Left Lateral Position. Front Oncol 2022; 12:950283. [PMID: 35898874 PMCID: PMC9309811 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.950283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
We had reported the novel concept of “caudal approach in laparoscopic liver resection” in 2013. In the first report, the caudal approach of laparoscopic transection–first posterior sectionectomy without prior mobilization of the liver in the left lateral position was described. Thereafter, 10 complex laparoscopic extended posterior sectionectomies with combined resection of the right hepatic vein or diaphragm were performed using the same approach. In the present study, the short-term outcomes of these cases and 42 cases of laparoscopic sectionectomies or hemi-hepatectomies (excluding left lateral sectionectomy) were compared. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of patients’ backgrounds, diseases for resection, preoperative liver function, tumor number and size, as well as outcomes, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, conversion to laparotomy, and post-operative hospital stay. Even complex laparoscopic extended posterior sectionectomy was safely performed using this procedure. This approach has the technical benefits of acquiring a well-opened transection plane between the resected liver fixed to the retroperitoneum and the residual liver sinking to the left with the force of gravity during parenchymal transection, and less bleeding from the right hepatic vein due to its higher position than the inferior vena cava. Furthermore, it has an oncological benefit similar to that of the anterior approach in open liver resection, even in posterior sectionectomy. The detailed procedure and general conceptual benefits of the caudal approach to laparoscopic liver resection for repeated multimodal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyoshi Endo
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
- *Correspondence: Zenichi Morise,
| | - Hidetoshi Katsuno
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Kenji Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Yukio Asano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akihiko Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shimizu A, Ito M, Lefor AK. Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Hepatic Surgery: An Historical Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123254. [PMID: 35743324 PMCID: PMC9225080 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatic surgery is a rapidly expanding component of abdominal surgery and is performed for a wide range of indications. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987 was a major change in abdominal surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was widely and rapidly adopted throughout the world for cholecystectomy initially and then applied to a variety of other procedures. Laparoscopic surgery became regularly applied to hepatic surgery, including segmental and major resections as well as organ donation. Many operations progressed from open surgery to laparoscopy to robot-assisted surgery, including colon resection, pancreatectomy, splenectomy thyroidectomy, adrenalectomy, prostatectomy, gastrectomy, and others. It is difficult to prove a data-based benefit using robot-assisted surgery, although laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery of the liver are not inferior regarding major outcomes. When laparoscopic surgery initially became popular, many had concerns about its use to treat malignancies. Robot-assisted surgery is being used to treat a variety of benign and malignant conditions, and studies have shown no deterioration in outcomes. Robot-assisted surgery for the treatment of malignancies has become accepted and is now being used at more centers. The outcomes after robot-assisted surgery depend on its use at specialized centers, the surgeon's personal experience backed up by extensive training and maintenance of international registries. Robot-assisted hepatic surgery has been shown to be associated with slightly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital lengths of stay compared to open surgery. Oncologic outcomes have been maintained, and some studies show higher rates of R0 resections. Patients who need surgery for liver lesions should identify a surgeon they trust and should not be concerned with the specific operative approach used. The growth of robot-assisted surgery of the liver has occurred in a stepwise approach which is very different from the frenzy that was seen with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach allowed the identification of areas for improvement, many of which are at the nexus of engineering and medicine. Further improvements in robot-assisted surgery depend on the combined efforts of engineers and surgeons.
Collapse
|
22
|
Morise Z, Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Ratti F, Cheung TT, Lo CM, Tanaka S, Kubo S, Okamura Y, Uesaka K, Monden K, Sadamori H, Hashida K, Kawamoto K, Gotohda N, Chen K, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Ohmura Y, Ueno M, Ogura T, Suh KS, Kato Y, Sugioka A, Belli A, Nitta H, Yasunaga M, Cherqui D, Abdul Halim N, Laurent A, Kaneko H, Otsuka Y, Kim KH, Cho HD, Lin CCW, Ome Y, Seyama Y, Troisi RI, Berardi G, Rotellar F, Wilson GC, Geller DA, Soubrane O, Yoh T, Kaizu T, Kumamoto Y, Han HS, Ekmekcigil E, Dagher I, Fuks D, Gayet B, Buell JF, Ciria R, Briceno J, O’Rourke N, Lewin J, Edwin B, Shinoda M, Abe Y, Hilal MA, Alzoubi M, Tanabe M, Wakabayashi G. An International Retrospective Observational Study of Liver Functional Deterioration after Repeat Liver Resection for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112598. [PMID: 35681578 PMCID: PMC9179920 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For 657 cases of segment or less repeat liver resection with results of plasma albumin and bilirubin levels and platelet counts before and 3 months after surgery, the indicators were compared before and after surgery. There were 268 open repeat after open and 224 cases laparoscopic repeat after laparoscopic liver resection. The background factors and liver functional indicators before and after surgery, and the changes were compared between both groups. Plasma levels of albumin (p = 0.006) and total bilirubin (p = 0.01) were decreased, and ALBI score (p = 0.001) indicated worse liver function after surgery. Though laparoscopic group had poorer performance status and liver function, changes of the values and overall survivals were similar between both groups. Plasma levels of albumin and bilirubin and ALBI score could be the liver functional indicators for liver functional deterioration after liver resection. The laparoscopic group with poorer conditions showed a similar deterioration of liver function and overall survival to the open group. Abstract Whether albumin and bilirubin levels, platelet counts, ALBI, and ALPlat scores could be useful for the assessment of permanent liver functional deterioration after repeat liver resection was examined, and the deterioration after laparoscopic procedure was evaluated. For 657 patients with liver resection of segment or less in whom results of plasma albumin and bilirubin levels and platelet counts before and 3 months after surgery could be retrieved, liver functional indicators were compared before and after surgery. There were 268 patients who underwent open repeat after previous open liver resection, and 224 patients who underwent laparoscopic repeat after laparoscopic liver resection. The background factors, liver functional indicators before and after surgery and their changes were compared between both groups. Plasma levels of albumin (p = 0.006) and total bilirubin (p = 0.01) were decreased, and ALBI score (p = 0.001) indicated worse liver function after surgery. Laparoscopic group had poorer preoperative performance status and liver function. Changes of liver functional values before and after surgery and overall survivals were similar between laparoscopic and open groups. Plasma levels of albumin and bilirubin and ALBI score could be the indicators for permanent liver functional deterioration after liver resection. Laparoscopic group with poorer conditions showed the similar deterioration of liver function and overall survivals to open group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenichi Morise
- Department of General Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki 444-0827, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Division in Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milano, Italy; (L.A.); (F.R.)
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, 80127 Naples, Italy;
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Division in Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milano, Italy; (L.A.); (F.R.)
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Division of HBP and Liver Transplant, University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; (T.T.C.); (C.M.L.)
| | - Chung Mau Lo
- Division of HBP and Liver Transplant, University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; (T.T.C.); (C.M.L.)
| | - Shogo Tanaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8586, Japan; (S.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8586, Japan; (S.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Yukiyasu Okamura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (Y.O.); (K.U.)
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (Y.O.); (K.U.)
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Departments of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama 721-8511, Japan; (K.M.); (H.S.)
| | - Hiroshi Sadamori
- Departments of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama 721-8511, Japan; (K.M.); (H.S.)
| | - Kazuki Hashida
- Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan; (K.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Kazuyuki Kawamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan; (K.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan;
| | - KuoHsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan;
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City 320, Taiwan
| | - Akishige Kanazawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka 534-0021, Japan;
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki 660-8511, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yoshiaki Ohmura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki 660-8511, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.O.)
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan;
| | - Toshiro Ogura
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Kyung Suk Suh
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan; (Y.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan; (Y.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Fondazione G.Pascale-IRCCS, National Cancer Institute of Naples, 80131 Napoli, Italy;
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Morioka 028-3695, Japan;
| | - Masafumi Yasunaga
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan;
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Paul Brousse Hospital, 94800 Villejuif, France; (D.C.); (N.A.H.)
- Paris-Sud University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
| | | | | | - Hironori Kaneko
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan; (H.K.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yuichiro Otsuka
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan; (H.K.); (Y.O.)
| | - Ki Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Ulsan University and Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea; (K.H.K.); (H.-D.C.)
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Ulsan University and Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea; (K.H.K.); (H.-D.C.)
| | - Charles Chung-Wei Lin
- Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
- IRCAD-AITS, Changhua 505, Taiwan
| | - Yusuke Ome
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan; (Y.O.); (Y.S.)
| | - Yasuji Seyama
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan; (Y.O.); (Y.S.)
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy;
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- General Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, 9000 Gent, Belgium;
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Unit of Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Gregory C. Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (G.C.W.); (D.A.G.)
| | - David A. Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (G.C.W.); (D.A.G.)
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy 92110, France; (O.S.); (T.Y.)
| | - Tomoaki Yoh
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy 92110, France; (O.S.); (T.Y.)
| | - Takashi Kaizu
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0374, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Yusuke Kumamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0374, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea; (H.-S.H.); (E.E.)
| | - Ela Ekmekcigil
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea; (H.-S.H.); (E.E.)
| | | | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, University of Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; (D.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, University of Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; (D.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Joseph F. Buell
- Tulane Transplant Abdominal Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (R.C.); (J.B.)
| | - Javier Briceno
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (R.C.); (J.B.)
| | - Nicholas O’Rourke
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; (N.O.); (J.L.)
| | - Joel Lewin
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; (N.O.); (J.L.)
| | - Bjorn Edwin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.A.)
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.A.)
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Istituto Ospedaliero—Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, BS, Italy;
- University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Mohammad Alzoubi
- University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK;
- General Surgery Department, The University of Jordan, Amman 11972, Jordan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo 362-8588, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kaibori M, Ichihara N, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Nanashima A, Kitagawa Y, Yamaue H, Yamamoto M, Endo I. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for liver cancers: A report from a nationwide surgical database in Japan. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:833-842. [PMID: 35445565 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Laparoscopic (repeat) liver resection (LRLR) is a well-established liver tumor treatment. However, since its outcomes and comparison with open repeat liver resection (ORLR) in recurrent liver cancer remain inadequately studied, this study then aimed to compare their short-term outcomes for liver cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, and metastatic liver cancer). METHODS Repeat liver resection cases between 2013 and 2017 from Japan's National Clinical Database were extracted. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the proportion of patients with postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher (CD2+) (primary endpoint), as well as the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative transfusion implementation rate (secondary endpoints). RESULTS Of 2,902 patients (ORLR, 2,476; LRLR, 426), 712 (356 per type) with comparable backgrounds remained via PSM. Before and after PSM, the postoperative CD2+ complication rate was significantly lower in the LRLR group, who had shorter operative time, smaller intraoperative bleeding volume, and lower intraoperative transfusion rate, than in the ORLR group (after matching, 7.6% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS LRLR showed better short-term outcomes than ORLR, making it a safer and more effective liver cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Kaibori
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nao Ichihara
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nanashima
- Project Management Subcommittee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Itaru Endo
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Leaping the Boundaries in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14082012. [PMID: 35454921 PMCID: PMC9028003 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Recent advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management lead to a redefinition of the actual frontiers of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (LLR) by including patients with more advanced disease. Nonetheless, because of both underlying liver conditions and technical difficulty, LLR for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is still considered as a challenging procedure. Specific concerns exist about LLR in cirrhotic patients, posterosuperior segments, giant and multiple tumors, as well as repeat resections. This review focuses on the specific limits of this approach in HCC patients in order to put into practice all the pre- and intra-operative precautions to overcome their boundaries, making this technique the standard of care within high-volume hepatobiliary centers. Abstract The minimally invasive approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had a slower diffusion compared to other surgical fields, mainly due to inherent peculiarities regarding the risks of uncontrollable bleeding, oncological inadequacy, and the need for both laparoscopic and liver major skills. Recently, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been associated with an improved postoperative course, including reduced postoperative decompensation, intraoperative blood losses, length of hospitalization, and unaltered oncological outcomes, leading to its adoption within international guidelines. However, LLR for HCC still faces several limitations, mainly linked to the impaired function of underlying parenchyma, tumor size and numbers, and difficult tumor position. The aim of this review is to highlight the state of the art and future perspectives of LLR for HCC, focusing on key points for overcoming currents limitations and pushing the boundaries in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS).
Collapse
|
25
|
Matsuo Y, Hokuto D, Yasuda S, Yoshikawa T, Kamitani N, Doi S, Nakagawa K, Nishiwada S, Nagai M, Terai T, Sho M. Impact of laparoscopic liver resection on liver regeneration. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7419-7430. [PMID: 35277763 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09155-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver regeneration after liver resection plays an important role in preventing posthepatectomy liver failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) on liver regeneration. METHODS Patients who underwent curative anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and colorectal liver metastases at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. The patients were divided into the OLR and LLR groups. Preoperative liver volume (PLV), future remnant liver volume, resected liver volume (RLV), liver volume at 1 month after the surgery, and liver volume at 6 months after the surgery were calculated. The liver regeneration rate was defined as the increase in the rate of RLV, and the liver recovery rate was defined as the rate of return to the PLV. RESULTS The study included 72 patients. Among them, 43 were included in the OLR group and 29 were included in the LLR group. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and surgical procedures between the two groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the liver regeneration rate at 1 month after the surgery (OLR vs. LLR: 68.9% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.875) and at 6 months after the surgery (91.8% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.995). Furthermore, the liver recovery rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 month after the surgery (90.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.893) and at 6 months after the surgery (96.9% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.986). CONCLUSION Liver regeneration after liver resection is not affected by the type of surgical procedure and both laparoscopic and open procedures yield similar regeneration and recovery rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoshikawa
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Naoki Kamitani
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Doi
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nishiwada
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Predicting Complications following Surgical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Newly Developed Neo-Glasgow Prognostic Score with ALBI Grade: Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery Cases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061402. [PMID: 35326554 PMCID: PMC8946274 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim: Nutritional assessment is known to be important for predicting prognosis in patients with malignant diseases. This study examined the usefulness of a prognostic predictive nutritional assessment tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with surgical resection. Materials/Methods: HCC patients (n = 429) classified as Child−Pugh A who underwent an R0 resection between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (median age 73 years, males 326 (76.0%), Child−Pugh score 5:6 = 326:103, single tumor 340 (79.2%), median tumor size 3.5 cm, open:laparoscopic = 304:125). Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and the newly developed neo-GPS method, which uses albumin−bilirubin grade 1 instead of albumin, were evaluated to compare their usefulness for prognosis prediction. Results: Median survival time for patients with a GPS score of 0, 1, and 2 was 120, 51, and 20 months, respectively. As for neo-GPS, that for those with a score of 0, 1, and 2 was not applicable (NA), 53 months, and 35 months, respectively (each p < 0.001; c-index: 0.556 and 0.611, respectively). Furthermore, median progression-free survival was 33, 22, and 9 months, and 41, 24, and 15 months, respectively (each p < 0.001; c-index: 0.539 and 0.578, respectively). As compared to patients with a high GPS (≥1), those with a high neo-GPS (≥1) showed a greater rate of high Clavien−Dindo classification (≥3) (39.2% vs. 65.1%). A comparison of patients with a high GPS (≥1) with those with a high neo-GPS (≥1) showed no significant difference regarding frequency of open or laparoscopic hepatectomy (17.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.670; 44.7% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.831, respectively), while the frequency of high Clavien−Dindo classification (≥3) was lower in patients who underwent a laparoscopic hepatectomy (11.2% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.007). Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the newly developed neo-GPS based on ALBI grade is an effective prognostic nutritional assessment tool and can be used for prediction of postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jeong ES, Kim JM, Lim M, Yang J, Kwon JE, Choi GS, Joh JW. Laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatectomy patients: inverse probability of treatment weighting. Updates Surg 2022; 74:527-534. [PMID: 35218476 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01257-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Repeat liver resection (RLR) is a good treatment option for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) is more technically demanding than open repeat liver resection (ORLR). The purpose of our study is to compare the surgical outcomes of ORLR and LRLR and to carefully present LRLR guidelines for HCC. We performed RLR at a single institution from January 2017 to November 2019. We divided the patients into an ORLR group and an LRLR group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied in this study to compare the ORLR group and the LRLR group. There was no difference between the two groups in patient characteristics, preoperative blood tests and pathological characteristics. After stabilized IPTW, the LRLR group had a shorter hospital stay (5.52 vs. 9.27 days, p = 0.001) and superior disease-free survival (p = 0.020). LRLR yielded better short-term outcomes than ORLR. And if a regular radiologic examination is performed, most of the recurrent tumors could be detected less than 3 cm. In conclusion, LRLR might be feasible and useful for recurrent HCC located contralateral to the previous tumor at a size of less than 3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Sung Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| | - Manuel Lim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jaehun Yang
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kinoshita M, Kanazawa A, Tanaka S, Takemura S, Amano R, Kimura K, Shinkawa H, Ohira G, Nishio K, Kubo S. Indications of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 6:119-126. [PMID: 35106422 PMCID: PMC8786700 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to evaluate the indications of laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma from the viewpoint of its difficulty. METHODS One hundred and one patients who underwent LRLR and 59 patients who underwent open repeat liver resection (ORLR) were included. The difficulty was classified according to the preoperative predictive factors for difficult LRLR, including an open approach during previous liver resection, history of two or more previous liver resections, history of previous major liver resection, tumor near the resected site of the previous liver resection, and intermediate or high difficulty with the difficulty scoring system. We compared the surgical outcomes between the LRLR and ORLR groups based on the difficulty class (low- or intermediate difficiulty class, 0 to 3 predictive factors; high difficiulty class, 4 or 5 factors). RESULTS In the low- or intermediate difficiulty class, intraoperative blood loss and the proportion of patients with postoperative complications were significantly lower in LRLR than in ORLR, and the duration of the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in LRLR than in ORLR. In the high difficiulty class, total operative time and operative time before starting hepatic parenchymal resection were significantly longer in LRLR than in ORLR, and there were no significant differences in other surgical outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION LRLR is recommended for patients in the low or intermediate difficulty class. However, LRLR does not have an advantage with longer operative time for patients in the high difficulty class compared with ORLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Kinoshita
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Akishige Kanazawa
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City General HospitalOsakaJapan
| | - Shogo Tanaka
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Shigekazu Takemura
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Ryosuke Amano
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Kenjiro Kimura
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Hiroji Shinkawa
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Go Ohira
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Kohei Nishio
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patrone R, Izzo F, Palaia R, Granata V, Nasti G, Ottaiano A, Pasta G, Belli A. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:2203-2215. [PMID: 35070052 PMCID: PMC8713325 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and a dismal prognosis. Radical surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment. Despite the increasing acceptance of laparoscopic liver resection for surgical treatment of malignant liver diseases, its use for ICC is not commonly performed. In fact, to achieve surgical free margins a major resection and/or vascular and/or biliary reconstructions is often needed, as well as an associated lymph node dissection.
AIM To review and summarize the current evidences on the minimally invasive resection of ICC.
METHODS A systematic review of the literature based on the criteria predetermined by the investigators was performed from the 1st of January 2009 up to the 1st of January 2021 in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases). All retrospective and prospective studies reporting on the comparative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive treatment of ICC were included. An evaluation of manuscripts quality was achieved using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS After a systematic search 9 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the all 3012 included patients, 2450 were operated by an open approach and 562 by a minimally invasive (laparoscopic) approach. Baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed, highlighting values with a statistical significant difference between patients treated with open or laparoscopic approach. Shorter hospital stay and lower intraoperative blood losses were reported by some Authors in minimally invasive surgery, on the contrary, in the open group there was a higher number of lymphadenectomies and a higher percentage of major hepatectomies.
CONCLUSION Minimally invasive resection of ICC has some short-term benefits and it is safe and feasible only in selected centers with a high experience in laparoscopic approach for liver surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, actually, was considered mainly in patients with a tumor with a diameter < 5 cm, without invasion of main biliary duct or main vessel and no vascular or biliary reconstructions were planned. Further studies are needed to elucidate its impact on long term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Patrone
- PhD ICTH, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80100, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Nasti
- SSD-Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Clinical and Experimental Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- SSD-Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Clinical and Experimental Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Gilda Pasta
- Division of Anesthesia, Pain medicine and Supportive Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Görgec B, Lanari J, Cipriani F, Russolillo N, Mocchegiani F, Zimmitti G, Alseidi A, Ruzzenente A, Edwin B, D'Hondt M, Besselink MG, Giuliante F, Fuks D, Rotellar F, López-Ben S, Ferrero A, Aldrighetti L, Cillo U, Vivarelli M, Abu Hilal M. Outcome of major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients; does surgical approach matter? A propensity score matched analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:1226-1239. [PMID: 34855277 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients still represents a great challenge for liver surgeons. Hence, the aim in the present study is to investigate the clinical impact of major hepatectomy and to assess whether the surgical approach influences the outcome of cirrhotic patients. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study including cirrhotic patients undergoing major laparoscopic (mjLLR) and open liver resection (mjOLR) in 14 Western liver centers was performed (2009-2020). Clinical, demographic, and perioperative data were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Long-term outcome after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 352 patients were included; 108 after mjLLR and 244 after mjOLR. After PSM, 88 patients were matched in each group. In the mjLLR group, compared to mjOLR, less blood loss (P = .042), lower overall and severe complication (P < .001, .020), such as surgical site infection, acute kidney injury and liver failure were observed, parallel to a shorter length of hospital stay. Stratifying patients based on the type of resection, less severe complications was observed only after laparoscopic left hepatectomy (P = .044), while the advantages of laparoscopy tend to decrease during right hepatectomy. Subgroup analysis of long-term survivals following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma showed no difference between mjLLR and mjOLR. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter experience suggests potential short-term benefits of mjLLR in cirrhotic patients compared to mjOLR, without compromising long-term outcome. These findings might have interesting clinical implications for the management of patients with chronic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Bjorn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB surgery, Institute of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Santiago López-Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, Wu E, Lin JD, Zhao JJ, Tan AYH, Hui Y, Kam JH, Goh BKP. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 109:21-29. [PMID: 34757385 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The exact role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis (LC) is not well defined. In this meta-analysis, both long- and short-term outcomes following LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) were analysed. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies reporting outcomes of LLR versus OLR of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). This was analysed using one-stage (individual participant data meta-analysis) and two-stage (aggregate data meta-analysis) approaches. Secondary outcomes were operation duration, blood loss, blood transfusion, Pringle manoeuvre utilization, overall and major complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 90-day mortality and R0 resection rates. RESULTS Eleven studies comprising 1618 patients (690 LLR versus 928 OLR) were included for analysis. In the one-stage meta-analysis, an approximately 18.7 per cent lower hazard rate (HR) of death in the LLR group (random effects: HR 0.81, 95 per cent confidence interval [C.I.] 0.68 to 0.96; P = 0.018) was observed. Two-stage meta-analysis resulted in a pooled HR of 0.84 (95 per cent C.I. 0.74 to 0.96; P = 0.01) in the overall LLR cohort. This indicated a 16-26 per cent reduction in the HR of death for patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LLR. For secondary outcomes, LLR was associated with less blood loss (mean difference [MD] -99 ml, 95 per cent C.I. -182 to -16 ml), reduced overall complications (odds ratio 0.49, 95 per cent C.I. 0.37 to 0.66) and major complications (odds ratio 0.45, 95 per cent C.I. 0.26 to 0.79), and shorter LOHS (MD -3.22 days, 95 per cent C.I. -4.38 to -2.06 days). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis is associated with improved survival and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Zoe Z Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Eric Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | | | | | - Alvin Y H Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yong Hui
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Juinn H Kam
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Its Influence on the Expression of Serum VEGF, FGF, and Immune Function. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2021; 2021:4432022. [PMID: 34650612 PMCID: PMC8510799 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4432022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. Partial hepatectomy is the most basic and effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma because of its high operative effect and perioperative safety. Open surgery is the most traditional hepatectomy. Although it can completely remove tumor lesions and prolong patient survival, it has disadvantages such as large trauma and long postoperative recovery time. Meanwhile, long-term bed rest can increase the risk of complications such as venous thrombosis and infection. The advantages of laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, such as clear operative field, simple operation, little trauma, light surgical stress, quick postoperative recovery, and low complications, can avoid damage to vital organs, blood vessels, and nerves, which has been widely accepted and recognized in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhong JH, Xing BC, Zhang WG, Chan AWH, Chong CCN, Serenari M, Peng N, Huang T, Lu SD, Liang ZY, Huo RR, Wang YY, Cescon M, Liu TQ, Li L, Wu FX, Ma L, Ravaioli M, Neri J, Cucchetti A, Johnson PJ, Li LQ, Xiang BD. Repeat hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective multicentre study. Br J Surg 2021; 109:71-78. [PMID: 34643677 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The therapeutic value of repeat hepatic resection (rHR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rHR or RFA. METHODS This was a retrospective multicentre study of patients with recurrent HCC within the Milan criteria who underwent rHR or RFA at nine university hospitals in China and Italy between January 2003 and January 2018. Survival after rHR or RFA was examined in unadjusted analyses and after propensity score matching (1 : 1). RESULTS Of 847 patients included, 307 and 540 underwent rHR and RFA respectively. Median overall survival was 73.5 and 67.0 months after rHR and RFA respectively (hazard ratio 1.01 (95 per cent c.i. 0.81 to 1.26)). Median recurrence-free survival was longer after rHR versus RFA (23.6 versus 15.2 months; hazard ratio 0.76 (95 per cent c.i. 0.65 to 0.89)). These results were confirmed after propensity score matching. RFA was associated with lower morbidity of grade 3 and above (0.6 versus 6.2 per cent; P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (8.0 versus 3.0 days, P < 0.001) than rHR. CONCLUSION rHR was associated with longer recurrence-free survival but not overall survival compared with RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-H Zhong
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - B-C Xing
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - W-G Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - A W-H Chan
- State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir Y. K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Anatomical & Cellular Pathology, and Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - C C N Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - N Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - T Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - S-D Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Z-Y Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, China
| | - R-R Huo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Y-Y Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - M Cescon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - T-Q Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - L Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - F-X Wu
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - L Ma
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - M Ravaioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Neri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - P J Johnson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - L-Q Li
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - B-D Xiang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Is minimally invasive liver surgery a reasonable option in recurrent HCC? A snapshot from the I Go MILS registry. Updates Surg 2021; 74:87-96. [PMID: 34601669 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01161-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a safe procedure. Repeat surgery is more often required, and the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is not yet clearly defined. The present study analyzes data compiled by the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (IGoMILS) on LLR. To compare repeated LLR with the first LLR for HCC is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the outcome of repeat LLR in the case of primary open versus primary MILS surgery. The data cohort is divided into two groups. Group 1: first liver resection and Group 2: Repeat LLR. To compare the two groups a 3:1 Propensity Score Matching is performed to analyze open versus MILS primary resection. Fifty-two centers were involved in the present study, and 1054 patients were enrolled. 80 patients underwent to a repeat LLR. The type of resection was different, with more major resections in the group 1 before matching the two groups. After propensity score matching 3:1, each group consisted of 222 and 74 patients. No difference between the two groups was observed. In the subgroup analysis, in 44 patients the first resection was performed by an open approach. The other 36 patients were resected with a MILS approach. We found no difference between these two subgroups of patients. The present study in repeat MILS for HCC using the IGoMILS Registry has observed the feasibility and safety of the MILS procedure.
Collapse
|
35
|
State-of-the-art surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2151-2162. [PMID: 34405284 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02298-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most commonly diagnosed primary liver tumor with an increasing incidence worldwide. Management of patients with HCC is largely dictated by the presence of cirrhosis, disease stage, underlying liver function, and patient performance status. PURPOSE We provide an update on key aspects of surgical treatment options for patients with HCC. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection and transplantation remain cornerstone treatment options for patients with early-stage disease and constitute the only potentially curative options for HCC. Selection of patients for surgical treatment should include a thorough evaluation of tumor characteristics and biology, as well as evidence-based use of various available treatment options to achieve optimal long-term outcomes for patients with HCC.
Collapse
|
36
|
Hobeika C, Cauchy F, Fuks D, Barbier L, Fabre JM, Boleslawski E, Regimbeau JM, Farges O, Pruvot FR, Pessaux P, Salamé E, Soubrane O, Vibert E, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: nationwide analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:419-426. [PMID: 33793726 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relevance of laparoscopic resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic (LLR) and open (OLR) liver resection for ICC, with specific focus on textbook outcome and lymph node dissection (LND). METHODS Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for ICC were included from two French, nationwide hepatopancreatobiliary surveys undertaken between 2000 and 2017. Patients with negative margins, and without transfusion, severe complications, prolonged hospital stay, readmission or death were considered to have a textbook outcome. Patients who achieved both a textbook outcome and LND were deemed to have an adjusted textbook outcome. OLR and LLR were compared after propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 548 patients with ICC (127 LLR, 421 OLR) were included. Textbook-outcome and LND completion rates were 22.1 and 48.2 per cent respectively. LLR was independently associated with a decreased rate of LND (odds ratio 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.69). After matching, 109 patients remained in each group. LLR was associated with a decreased rate of transfusion (7.3 versus 21.1 per cent; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 7 versus 14 days; P = 0.001), but lower rate of LND (33.9 versus 73.4 per cent; P = 0.001). Patients who underwent LLR had lower rate of adjusted TO completion than patients who had OLR (6.5 versus 17.4 per cent; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach did not substantially improve quality of care of patients with resectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - F Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris V, Paris, France
| | - L Barbier
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Trousseau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France
| | - J M Fabre
- Department of Digestive, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E Boleslawski
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Université Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - J M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - O Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F R Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Université Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - P Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Trousseau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France
| | - O Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - E Vibert
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Université Paris XI, Paris, France
| | - O Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chua D, Syn N, Koh YX, Goh BKP. Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:351-358. [PMID: 33779690 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has become an important option for the treatment of various liver tumours. A major concern is the learning curve required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and summarize current literature analysing the learning curve for MIH. METHODS A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in MIH to July 2019 was performed using PubMed and Scopus databases. All original full-text articles published in English relating to learning curves for both laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), robotic liver resection (RLR), or a combination of these, were included. To explore quantitatively the learning curve for MIH, a meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Forty studies relating to learning curves in MIH were included. The median overall number of procedures required in studies utilizing cumulative summative (CUSUM) methodology for LLR was 50 (range 25-58) and for RLR was 25 (16-50). After adjustment for year of adoption of MIH, the CUSUM-derived caseload to surmount the learning curve for RLR was 47.1 (95 per cent c.i. 1.2 to 71.6) per cent; P = 0.046) less than that required for LLR. A year-on-year reduction in the number of procedures needed for MIH was observed, commencing at 48.3 cases in 1995 and decreasing to 23.8 cases in 2015. CONCLUSION The overall learning curve for MIH decreased steadily over time, and appeared less steep for RLR compared with LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sun Q, Zhang X, Gong X, Hu Z, Zhang Q, He W, Chang X, Hu Z, Chen Y. Survival analysis between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data. Hepatol Int 2021; 15:1215-1235. [PMID: 34258665 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10219-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has been widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is generally believed that the long-term outcomes of LH are not inferior to open hepatectomy (OH). However, the quality of evidence is low. The purpose of this study was to reconstruct time-to-event data for meta-analysis based on Kaplan-Meier curves from propensity-score matched studies and compare survival rates following LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS All published propensity-score matched studies reported in English that compared LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma with Kaplan-Meier curves were screened. Patients' survival information was reconstructed with the aid of a computer vision program. Different models (fixed-effects model for two-stage survival analysis and Cox regression for one-stage survival analysis) were performed for sensitivity analysis. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, two specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients by types of resection, cirrhosis status. RESULTS Time-to-event data were extracted from 45 propensity-score matched studies (N = 8905). According to the time-to-event data and the reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves, the cumulative overall survival rate was 49.0% and 50.9% in the LH and OH cohorts, respectively, a log-rank test did not demonstrate statistical significance (p > 0.05). The cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was both close to 0.0%. The median RFS time was 49.1 (95% CI 46.1 ~ 51.7) and 44.3 (95% CI 41 ~ 46.1) months. The difference in disease status was statistically significant by the Log-rank test (p < 0.05). Using the random-effects model of two-stage analysis, the minor hepatectomy subgroup (HR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.09, 1.55], I2 = 6.2%, p = 0.383) and the shared fragile model of one-stage analysis (HR = 1.44 95% CI [1.23, 1.69], p < 0.001) suggested that LH could significantly prolong RFS of patients compared with OH. This result was consistent with sensitivity analysis using different models. CONCLUSION This study was the first reconstructed time-to-event data based on a high-quality propensity-score matching study to compare the survival outcomes of LH and OH in the treatment of HCC. Results suggested that LH can improve RFS in patients with HCC undergoing minor hepatectomy and may also benefit long-term RFS in overall patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Sun
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiangda Zhang
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Xueyi Gong
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zhipeng Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Qiao Zhang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Weiming He
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiaojian Chang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zemin Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Miyama A, Morise Z, Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Ratti F, Cheung TT, Lo CM, Tanaka S, Kubo S, Okamura Y, Uesaka K, Monden K, Sadamori H, Hashida K, Kawamoto K, Gotohda N, Chen K, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Ohmura Y, Ueno M, Ogura T, Suh KS, Kato Y, Sugioka A, Belli A, Nitta H, Yasunaga M, Cherqui D, Halim NA, Laurent A, Kaneko H, Otsuka Y, Kim KH, Cho HD, Lin CCW, Ome Y, Seyama Y, Troisi RI, Berardi G, Rotellar F, Wilson GC, Geller DA, Soubrane O, Yoh T, Kaizu T, Kumamoto Y, Han HS, Ekmekcigil E, Dagher I, Fuks D, Gayet B, Buell JF, Ciria R, Briceno J, O’Rourke N, Lewin J, Edwin B, Shinoda M, Abe Y, Hilal MA, Alzoubi M, Tanabe M, Wakabayashi G. Multicenter Propensity Score-Based Study of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subgroup Analysis of Cases with Tumors Far from Major Vessels. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133187. [PMID: 34202373 PMCID: PMC8268302 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Less morbidity is considered among the advantages of laparoscopic liver resection for HCC patients. However, our previous international, multi-institutional study of laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) failed to prove it. We hypothesize that these results may be since the study included complex cases performed during the procedure’s developing stage. To examine it, subgroup analysis based on propensity score were performed, defining the proximity of the tumors to major vessels as the complexity. A propensity score matching earned 115 each patient of LRLR and open repeat liver resection (ORLR) without the proximity to major vessels, and the outcomes were compared. With comparable operation time and long-term outcome, less blood loss and less morbidity were shown in LRLR group than ORLR. Even in its worldwide developing stage, LRLR for HCC patients could be beneficial in blood loss and morbidity for the patients with less complexity in surgery. Abstract Less morbidity is considered among the advantages of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for HCC patients. However, our previous international, multi-institutional, propensity score-based study of emerging laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) failed to prove this advantage. We hypothesize that these results may be since the study included complex LRLR cases performed during the procedure’s developing stage. To examine it, subgroup analysis based on propensity score were performed, defining the proximity of the tumors to major vessels as the indicator of complex cases. Among 1582 LRLR cases from 42 international high-volume liver surgery centers, 620 cases without the proximity to major vessels (more than 1 cm far from both first–second branches of Glissonian pedicles and major hepatic veins) were selected for this subgroup analysis. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on their patient characteristics, preoperative liver function, tumor characteristics and surgical procedures. One hundred and fifteen of each patient groups of LRLR and open repeat liver resection (ORLR) were earned, and the outcomes were compared. Backgrounds were well-balanced between LRLR and ORLR groups after matching. With comparable operation time and long-term outcome, less blood loss (283.3±823.0 vs. 603.5±664.9 mL, p = 0.001) and less morbidity (8.7 vs. 18.3 %, p = 0.034) were shown in LRLR group than ORLR. Even in its worldwide developing stage, LRLR for HCC patients could be beneficial in blood loss and morbidity for the patients with less complexity in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arimasa Miyama
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki 444-0827, Japan;
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki 444-0827, Japan;
- Correspondence:
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Division in Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milano, Italy; (L.A.); (F.R.)
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, 80121 Naples, Italy;
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Division in Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milano, Italy; (L.A.); (F.R.)
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Division of HBP and Liver Transplant, University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong 999077, China; (T.-T.C.); (C.-M.L.)
| | - Chung-Mau Lo
- Division of HBP and Liver Transplant, University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong 999077, China; (T.-T.C.); (C.-M.L.)
| | - Shogo Tanaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8586, Japan; (S.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8586, Japan; (S.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Yukiyasu Okamura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (Y.O.); (K.U.)
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan; (Y.O.); (K.U.)
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Departments of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama 721-8511, Japan; (K.M.); (H.S.)
| | - Hiroshi Sadamori
- Departments of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama 721-8511, Japan; (K.M.); (H.S.)
| | - Kazuki Hashida
- Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan; (K.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Kazuyuki Kawamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan; (K.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan;
| | - KuoHsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan;
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan
| | - Akishige Kanazawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka 534-0021, Japan;
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki 660-8511, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yoshiaki Ohmura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki 660-8511, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.O.)
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-5810, Japan;
| | - Toshiro Ogura
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan; (Y.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan; (Y.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Fondazione G.Pascale-IRCCS, National Cancer Institute of Naples, 80131 Napoli, Italy;
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate 028-3695, Japan;
| | - Masafumi Yasunaga
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume 830-0011, Japan;
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif 94800, France; (D.C.); (N.A.H.)
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94010 Créteil, France;
| | - Nasser Abdul Halim
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif 94800, France; (D.C.); (N.A.H.)
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94010 Créteil, France;
| | - Hironori Kaneko
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan; (H.K.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yuichiro Otsuka
- Division of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan; (H.K.); (Y.O.)
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Ulsan University and Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea; (K.-H.K.); (H.-D.C.)
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Ulsan University and Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea; (K.-H.K.); (H.-D.C.)
| | - Charles Chung-Wei Lin
- Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei 11259, Taiwan;
- IRCAD-AITS, Changhua County 505, Taiwan
| | - Yusuke Ome
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan; (Y.O.); (Y.S.)
| | - Yasuji Seyama
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan; (Y.O.); (Y.S.)
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy;
- General Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, 9000 Gent, Belgium;
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- General Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, 9000 Gent, Belgium;
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Gregory C. Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; (G.C.W.); (D.A.G.)
| | - David A. Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; (G.C.W.); (D.A.G.)
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, 92110 Clichy, France; (O.S.); (T.Y.)
| | - Tomoaki Yoh
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, 92110 Clichy, France; (O.S.); (T.Y.)
| | - Takashi Kaizu
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Yusuke Kumamoto
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (H.-S.H.); (E.E.)
| | - Ela Ekmekcigil
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (H.-S.H.); (E.E.)
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, 92140 Clamart, France;
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, University of Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; (D.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, University of Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; (D.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Joseph F. Buell
- Department of Surgery, Tulane Transplant Abdominal Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA;
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (R.C.); (J.B.)
| | - Javier Briceno
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofia, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; (R.C.); (J.B.)
| | - Nicholas O’Rourke
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (N.O.); (J.L.)
| | - Joel Lewin
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; (N.O.); (J.L.)
| | - Bjorn Edwin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.A.)
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.A.)
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero–Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Mohammad Alzoubi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
- Department of General Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo 362-8588, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen JF, Fu XT, Gao Z, Shi YH, Tang Z, Liu WR, Zhang X, Gao Q, Ding GY, Song K, Wang XY, Zhou J, Fan J, Ding ZB. Laparoscopic vs. Open Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Liver Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Study and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:646737. [PMID: 33968747 PMCID: PMC8100033 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear whether the short-term benefits of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) accrue to patients with recurrent liver tumors. The present study aimed to report our own center's experience and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LRH in comparison with open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) for treating recurrent liver tumors. Patients and Methods: A propensity score–matched study was performed including 426 patients receiving LRH or ORH for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2017 and December 2018. Surgical outcomes and perioperative inflammation-based markers, including monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune–inflammation index were collected from medical records and analyzed. Additionally, a systematic literature review was performed to identify relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases up to October 1, 2020. Information including patient demographics, pathologic characteristics, and short-term outcomes was extracted and analyzed using random- or fixed-effects models. Results: Of 68 LRHs, 57 were matched with an ORH finally. Our study demonstrated that LRH was significantly associated with less intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL; P < 0.001), lower rate of hepatic inflow occlusion (10.52 vs. 33.3%; P = 0.003), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001) after 1:1 propensity score matching. The operation time, rate of blood transfusion, and postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Moreover, all four inflammation-based markers were significantly lower in LRH group on postoperative day 1. In the meta-analysis, a total of 12 studies comprising 1,315 patients receiving repeat hepatectomy met the selection criteria. Similar to our own study, the meta-analysis showed shorter hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.79 to −0.22, P < 0.001], less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = −0.79, 95% CI = −1.11 to −0.47, P < 0.001), and lower rate of major postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.19–0.66, P = 0.001] in the LRH group. There was no difference in the field of overall postoperative complication and operation time between LRH and ORH groups. Conclusion: Compared with ORH, LRH results in relatively better surgical outcomes and faster postoperative recovery. It could be considered a feasible and effective option for the treatment of recurrent liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Feng Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiu-Tao Fu
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Gao
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying-Hong Shi
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Tang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Ren Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang-Yu Ding
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kang Song
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory for Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory for Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Bin Ding
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Introduction Globally, the incidence, as well as mortality, related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is on the rise, owing to relatively few curative options. Underlying cirrhosis is the most common etiology leading to HCC, but risk factors of cirrhosis show great regional variability. Over the years, there has been a steady development in the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of HCC, including the availability of a wide range of systemic chemotherapeutic agents. We aim to review the recent advancements in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for HCC. Methodology The literature search was done using databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct, and the latest relevant articles were reviewed. Findings Screening of HCC is a pivotal step in the early diagnosis of the disease. Current guidelines recommend using ultrasound and alfa fetoprotein but various new biomarkers are under active research that might aid in diagnosing very small tumors, not picked up by the current screening methods. Treatment options are decided based upon the overall performance of the patient and the extent of the disease, as per the Barcelona classification. There are very few options that offer a cure for the disease, ranging from liver resection and transplantation to tumor ablation. Downstaging has proven to have a significant role in the course of the disease. An attempt to control the disease can be made via radiological interventions, such as transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, or radiation therapy. For advanced disease, sorafenib used to be the only option until a couple of years ago. Recently, many other systemic agents have received approval as first-line and second-line therapies for HCC. Genomics is an area of active clinical research as understanding the mutations and genomics involved in the evolution of HCC might lead to a breakthrough therapy. How to cite this article Raees A, Kamran M, Özkan H, et al. Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):32–40.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimun Raees
- The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Hasan Özkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Wasim Jafri
- The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mohan R, Kabir T, Wu AGR, Lim KI, Goh BKP. Analysis of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic repeat liver resection compared to laparoscopic primary liver resection based on a single surgeon's experience: A 1:2 propensity score-matched study. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:382-387. [PMID: 33035786 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report a single surgeon experience with laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR), and analyse short-term outcomes relative to laparoscopic primary liver resection (LPLR). METHODS Two-hundred and twenty-two laparoscopic liver resections were performed from 2012 to 2019 of which 33 were LRLR. 1:2 propensity-score matching was done to compare 32 LRLR with 64 LPLR cohort. We further analyzed the first 16 LRLR cases compared to the subsequent 17 cases. RESULTS 32 LRLR cases were matched to 64 LPLR cases. Apart from a higher frequency of Pringle maneuver in the LPLR cohort (p = 0.006), there were no differences in other perioperative outcomes. There were more posterosuperior located tumours (75.0% vs 17.6%, p = 0.003) and higher median difficulty score (8.50 vs 5.00, p = 0.025) in the initial 16 LRLR cases compared to the next 17. The earlier group had higher median blood loss (250.00 ml vs 50.00 ml, p = 0.012), but other outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION LRLR may be safely performed in selected patients with no difference in key perioperative outcomes compared to LPLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramkumar Mohan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tousif Kabir
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Andrew Guan Ru Wu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai Inn Lim
- Department of Anaesthesia, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Morise Z. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:485-489. [PMID: 33005842 PMCID: PMC7511566 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recurrence of liver cancers inside the liver are often treated with liver resection (LR). However, increased risks of complications and conversion during operation were reported in laparoscopic repeat LR (LRLR). The indication is still controversial. One multi-institutional propensity score matching analysis of LRLR vs open repeat LR for hepatocellular carcinoma, two propensity score matching analyses for colorectal metastases, and two meta-analyses including hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastases, and other tumors have been reported to date. LRLR was reported with better to comparable short-term and similar long-term outcomes. Furthermore, the shorter operation time and the smaller amount of intraoperative bleeding for LRLR was reported for the patients who had undergone laparoscopic rather than open LR as an earlier procedure. The speculations are presented, that complete dissection of adhesion can be dodged and laparoscopic minor repeated LR can minimize the liver functional deterioration in cirrhotic patients. LRLR, as a powerful local therapy, could contribute to the long-term outcomes of those with deteriorated liver function. However, the procedure is now in its developing stage worldwide and further accumulation of experiences and evaluation are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenichi Morise
- Department of SurgeryFujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical CenterAichiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Allaire M, Goumard C, Lim C, Le Cleach A, Wagner M, Scatton O. New frontiers in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2020; 2:100134. [PMID: 32695968 PMCID: PMC7360891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is one of the main curative options for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis and is the treatment of choice in non-cirrhotic patients. However, careful patient selection is required to balance the risk of postoperative liver failure and the potential benefit on long-term outcomes. In the last decades, improved surgical techniques and perioperative management, as well as better patient selection, have enabled the indications for liver resection to be expanded. In this review, we aim to describe the main indications for liver resection in the management of HCC, its role compared to percutaneous ablation and liver transplantation in the therapeutic algorithm, as well as the recent advances in liver surgery that could be used to improve the prognosis of patients with HCC.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALPPS, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
- BCLC, Barcelona Clinic liver cancer
- CSPH, clinically significant portal hypertension
- DFS, disease-free survival
- GSA, galactosyl serum albumin
- HCC
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HVGP, hepatic venous pression gradient
- ICG, indocyanine green
- ICG-R15, hepatic clearance of ICG 15 minutes after its intravenous administration
- IL-6, interleukin 6
- LR, liver resection
- LSM, liver stiffness measurement
- Laparoscopy
- Liver resection
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- OS, overall survival
- PVL, portal vein ligation
- PVTT, tumour-related portal vein thrombosis
- RFA, radiofrequency ablation
- SSM, spleen stiffness measurement
- Surgery
- TACE, transarterial chemoembolisation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Allaire
- Sorbonne Université, Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, France Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Aline Le Cleach
- Sorbonne Université, Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Wagner
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Service de Radiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wigmore SJ. Advances in liver surgery. Br J Surg 2020; 107:788-789. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S J Wigmore
- Medical Research Council Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|