Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Repeat hepatectomies are technically complex procedures. The evidence of robotic or laparoscopic (= minimally invasive) repeat hepatectomies (MIRH) after previous open hepatectomy is poor. Therefore, we compared postoperative outcomes of MIRH vs open repeat hepatectomies (ORH) in patients with liver tumors after previous open liver resections.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent repeat hepatectomies after open liver resections were identified from a prospective database between April 2018 and May 2023. Postoperative complications were graded in line with the Clavien-Dindo classification. We stratified patients by intention to treat into MIRH or ORH and compared outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to define variables associated with the utilization of a minimally invasive approach.

RESULTS

Among 46 patients included, 20 (43%) underwent MIRH and 26 (57%) ORH. Twenty-seven patients had advanced or expert repeat hepatectomies (59%) according to the IWATE criteria. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The use of a minimally invasive approach was not dependent on preoperative or intraoperative variables. All patients had negative resection margins on final histology. MIRH was associated with less blood loss (450 ml, IQR (interquartile range): 200-600 vs 600 ml, IQR: 400-1500 ml, P = 0.032), and shorter length of stay (5 days, IQR: 4-7 vs 7 days, IQR: 5-9 days, P = 0.041). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (P = 0.298).

CONCLUSIONS

MIRH is feasible after previous open hepatectomy and a safe alternative approach to ORH. (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00032183).

Osseous metaplasia in a recurrent symptomatic rectal lesion: a rare occurrence

BACKGROUND

Osseous metaplasia of the gastrointestinal tract is exceedingly rare. Associated with colorectal cancer, juvenile polyps , and inflammatory polyps, the exact etiology is still unknown. We present a case report on a young male with recurrent rectal polyps and rectal bleeding. Histopathology revealed an inflammatory polyp with focal osseous metaplasia.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old male without significant past medical history but with a significant smoking history of 10 pack-years. He initially presented to the colorectal clinic approximately 8 months prior with complaints of rectal pain and bleeding. The patient subsequently underwent colonoscopy which demonstrated a friable 2-cm mass at the dentate line. He was taken to the operating room for a transanal mass excision which, at the time, pathologic examination demonstrated a hyperplastic polyp with no evidence of dysplasia or malignancy. The patient returned to the clinic 8 months later with similar complaints of rectal bleeding. He denied any constitutional symptoms, weight loss, abdominal pain, diarrhea, or constipation. Upon rectal examination, he was noted to have a soft palpable mass blood on digital rectal exam. The patient was taken for repeat colonoscopy and was found to have a recurrent mass at the dentate line. Given the recurrent mass, the patient was taken for a re-excision in the operating room. Histopathology returned showing a 1.8 × 1.5 × 1.5 cm inflammatory polyp with focal osseous metaplasia.

CONCLUSION

Osseous metaplasia of the gastrointestinal tract is a rare occurrence that can be associated with benign polyps or malignancy. Certain markers have been shown to be linked to this process and polypectomy remains the gold standard of treatment; however, further research is warranted.