Conservative proctocolectomy: a dubious option in ulcerative colitis

The rectal remnant after total colectomy for colitis - intra-operative,post-operative and longer-term considerations

OBJECTIVES

Acute severe colitis requires surgery in around 30% of the cases. Total colectomy with ileostomy is the standard procedure with distinct advantages to a laparoscopic approach. Less agreement exists regarding the formation or configuration of the retained rectal stump and its short-term and long-term management. In this review, aspects of management of the rectal remnant, including perioperative considerations, potential complications, medical treatment, surveillance and implications for proctectomy and reconstructive surgery are explored.

METHODS

A thorough literature review exploring the PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to clarify the evidence base surrounding areas of controversy in the surgical approach to acute severe colitis. In particular, focus was given to evidence surrounding management of the rectal remnant.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of high quality evidence for optimal management of the rectal stump following colectomy, and randomised trials are lacking. Establishment of laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with distinct advantages as well as the emergence of unique considerations, including those specific to rectal remnant management.

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgical involvement and a multidisciplinary approach to the management of acute severe colitis are advocated. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy should be the operation of choice, with division of the rectum at the pelvic brim leaving a closed intraperitoneal remnant. If the rectum is severely inflamed, a mucus fistula may be useful, and an indwelling rectal catheter is probably advantageous to reduce the complications associated with stump dehiscence. Patients electing not to proceed to proctectomy should undergo surveillance for dysplasia of the rectum.

Management of nonhealing perineal wounds

The manifestations of perianal Crohn's disease vary from primary lesions such as skin tags and fissures, to diffuse septic destruction of tissue and sphincter muscle. These manifestations are often persistent and refractory to surgical treatment; however, a more disappointing scenario is when the treatment itself results in a chronic wound. The ideal approach for management involves basic surgical principles, careful patient selection, and realistic expectations. Choice of appropriate procedure, effective elimination of sepsis, thorough evaluation to rule out concomitant systemic disease, and appropriate use of fecal diversion are each an important principle. If proctectomy is necessary, several strategies such as intersphincteric dissection, avoidance of fecal contamination, and appropriate wound closure, are effective in diminishing the postoperative morbidity of an unhealed perineal wound. When an unhealed perineal wound develops in a patient with Crohn's disease, the initial management is conservative. When surgical treatment is necessary, success depends on careful patient selection, optimizing the patient's condition, elimination of sepsis, and choice of an effective technique for healing.

Pelvic sepsis after extended Hartmann's procedure

PURPOSE

An extended Hartmann's procedure is occasionally useful in rectal resections, because anastomotic, perineal, and functional problems are eliminated. This study was designed to examine the occurrence of pelvic sepsis after this procedure and identify possible risk factors.

METHODS

Medical records were available for 163 patients (89 females) undergoing rectal resection with colostomy and closure of the rectal remnant. Information about pelvic sepsis and possible risk factors was obtained by review of the medical records.

RESULTS

Pelvis sepsis developed in 31 of 163 patients (18.6 percent). When the rectum had been transected <2 cm above the pelvic floor, 24 of 73 patients (32.9 percent) developed an abscess in contrast to 7 of 90 (7.8 percent) after higher transsection (P = 0.0001). Other risk factors were male gender and missing foot pulses. Only 61 percent of pelvic abscesses healed after a median of 59 days, leaving 39 percent unhealed after an observation period of 277 (range, 20-1,643) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical alternatives should be considered to an extended Hartmann's procedure when the level of transsection is <2 cm above the pelvic floor, particularly in males.

Effect of rectosigmoid stump length on restorative proctocolectomy after subtotal colectomy

BACKGROUND

The length of the rectosigmoid stump left after subtotal colectomy and ileostomy is believed to affect postoperative complications, including sepsis, success of future restorative proctocolectomy, and long-term functional outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 60 patients with toxic ulcerative colitis who were treated with subtotal colectomy leaving either a short (25) or long (35) rectosigmoid stump and who eventually underwent restorative proctocolectomy between 1983 and 1992 at a large tertiary care center. Data were collected on preoperative disease duration and steroid use, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, length of stay, stool frequency, fecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction.

RESULTS

There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectosigmoid stump length does not appear to affect complications or long-term outcome in patients with toxic ulcerative colitis treated with subtotal colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy.

Colectomy for acute colitis: is it safe to close the rectal stump?

We report 62 operations for acute colonic inflammatory bowel disease in which the rectal stump was closed. Operative findings were of severe colitis in 46, toxic megacolon in 8 and faecal peritonitis in 8 patients. Histology showed ulcerative colitis in 48, Crohn's disease in 9 and indeterminate colitis in 5 patients. Clinical evidence of stump leakage occurred in only one of 53 patients with a long rectal stump in contrast to 3 of 9 patients who had a short rectal stump. Leaving a very short stump also led to difficulty at subsequent proctectomy in 3 patients and at restorative proctocolectomy in 1 patient. This suggests that careful closure of the rectum above the peritoneal reflection can be a safe means of dealing with the rectal stump after total colectomy and ileostomy for acute colitis.

Restorative proctocolectomy in elective and emergency cases of ulcerative colitis

A consecutive series of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis was reviewed to determine whether an emergency restorative proctocolectomy procedure leads to a higher morbidity, more especially anastomotic leakage. Severity of illness and nature of surgery were divided in two categories: (1) no acute disease and elective surgery (18 patients), (2) acute disease requiring emergency surgery either immediately or within one week of admission (12 patients). Morbidity after elective surgery was 27% and after emergency surgery 66% (P < 0.06). Pouch-anal leakage occurred in 11% and 41% respectively (P = 0.08). Five risk factors significantly influenced the leak rate including preoperative white blood cell count > 10,000/microliter (P < 0.02), urgent nature of surgery (P < 0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and urgent nature of surgery (P = 0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and preoperative corticosteroid dose equivalent to > or = 200 mg hydrocortisone/24 h (P = 0.006), postoperative pelvic haematoma (P < 0.05). In conclusion, restorative proctocolectomy is contraindicated in emergency circumstances, especially in patients with signs of sepsis on a high corticosteroid dose. To reduce operative risk and number of procedures required, patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis should be referred for restorative proctocolectomy while being in remission.

Subcutaneous rectal stump closure after emergency subtotal colectomy

Subtotal colectomy with preservation of the rectum is now the procedure of choice for patients with severe colitis requiring emergency surgery. The use of subcutaneous 'rectal closure' when the retained distal bowel is placed at the caudal end of the abdominal incision in the subcutaneous or fascial layer is studied. An anal catheter may be placed to drain the rectum. Thirty-two patients (14 men, 18 women) of mean age 33 (range 17-77) years with severe inflammatory bowel disease (29 ulcerative colitis, one Crohn's disease, one indeterminate colitis, one Campylobacter colitis) underwent emergency colectomy with subcutaneous rectal stump closure. Twenty-three stumps were closed with staples, four sutured and five by both staples and sutures. Complications developed in seven patients (22 per cent), of which two required surgical intervention. One significant wound infection was treated successfully with a course of antibiotics. Three minor wound infections did not require specific treatment. The rectal stump was always readily located at the time of restorative surgery. This technique is recommended as a simple and safe alternative to an open mucus fistula provided that surgeons adhere to standard surgical principles; in particular the distal bowel should not be brought out into the wound under tension.

Management of the rectum following colectomy for acute colitis

During a 6 year period, 31 consecutive patients under the care of one surgeon had emergency colectomies for complicated colitis. A selective policy of closing the rectum intraperitoneally to minimize the length of retained diseased bowel and to avoid a mucus fistula was used during the study period. One patient underwent proctocolectomy, 7 subtotal colectomy with mucus fistula and 23 total colectomies with intraperitoneal closure of the rectum. Two patients (8.9%) developed pelvic sepsis. Both had intraperitoneal closure of the rectal stump and were readily managed by drainage into the stump. Subsequent surgery in the 18 patients having rectal excision has been uncomplicated. Intraperitoneal closure of the rectal stump in emergency surgery for complicated colitis can be performed safely in most of these patients.

Conservative proctocolectomy with low transection of the anorectum is a poor alternative to conventional proctocolectomy in inflammatory bowel disease

The perineal wound is a frequent source of morbidity following proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. In 8 patients low transection of the anorectum or conservative proctocolectomy has been performed as an alternative to proctocolectomy in order to avoid a perineal wound. All patients passed copious mucoid discharge per anum post-operatively. Five patients required a proctectomy, 2 remain symptomatic and 1 patient has undergone a restorative proctocolectomy. This small series suggests conservative proctocolectomy does not seem to offer any advantage over conventional proctocolectomy in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease.