Tamoxifen therapy in unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and the papilla of Vater

Integrated genomic analysis to identify druggable targets for pancreatic cancer

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the standard treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) is gemcitabine and fluorouracil. Other chemotherapeutic agents have been widely combined. However, drug resistance remains a huge challenge, leading to the ineffectiveness of cancer therapy. Therefore, we are trying to discover new treatments for PC by utilizing genomic information to identify PC-associated genes as well as drug target genes for drug repurposing. Genomic information from a public database, the cBio Cancer Genomics Portal, was employed to retrieve the somatic mutation genes of PC. Five functional annotations were applied to prioritize the PC risk genes: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; biological process; knockout mouse; Gene List Automatically Derived For You; and Gene Expression Omnibus Dataset. DrugBank database was utilized to extract PC drug targets. To narrow down the most promising drugs for PC, CMap Touchstone analysis was applied. Finally, ClinicalTrials.gov and a literature review were used to screen the potential drugs under clinical and preclinical investigation. Here, we extracted 895 PC-associated genes according to the cBioPortal database and prioritized them by using five functional annotations; 318 genes were assigned as biological PC risk genes. Further, 216 genes were druggable according to the DrugBank database. CMap Touchstone analysis indicated 13 candidate drugs for PC. Among those 13 drugs, 8 drugs are in the clinical trials, 2 drugs were supported by the preclinical studies, and 3 drugs are with no evidence status for PC. Importantly, we found that midostaurin (targeted PRKA) and fulvestrant (targeted ESR1) are promising candidate drugs for PC treatment based on the genomic-driven drug repurposing pipelines. In short, integrated analysis using a genomic information database demonstrated the viability for drug repurposing. We proposed two drugs (midostaurin and fulvestrant) as promising drugs for PC.

A pilot study of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common pancreatic neoplasm with 5-year survival as low as 6%. It is therefore imperative to explore potential treatment avenues to improve survival in these groups of patients. Anti-estrogenic hormone therapy (AEHT) is well-tolerated and has been used in estrogen receptor (ER) subgroups of breast cancer. ER is a type of sex hormone receptor which have been reported to be expressed inconsistently in pancreatic cancer. This study aims to identify the presence of ER in PDAC specimens to guide potential use of AEHT in the management of unresectable PDAC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case control study of 10 patients (5 males, 5 females) who underwent pancreatic resections for PDAC from 2011 to 2012. Sections of the post-operative specimens were prepared and sent for ER staining. Pancreatic tissue specimens that were analysed included (I) ductal epithelial cells; (II) acinar cells; (III) islet cells; (IV) intralobular stromal cells; and (V) adenocarcinoma cells.

RESULTS

Intralobular stromal cells were positively stained for ER in 7/10 (70%) of the cases, but were of weak intensity and patchy in distribution. Islet cells (<1%) stained for ER in 3/10 (30%) of the cases. Ductal epithelial cells, acinar cells and adenocarcinoma cells stained negative for ER in all of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study did not detect the presence of ER expression in PDAC. ER expression in intralobular stromal and islet cells which was previously unreported, were noted in our study. The role of AEHT in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain and does not appear to be of value at present.

Important roles of estrogen receptor alpha in tumor progression and anti-estrogen therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIMS

The roles of estrogen receptors (ERs) and the efficacy of anti-estrogen (E2) therapies in pancreatic cancer stay controversial. The main objectives of this study were to investigate the potential roles of ERs in tumor progression and endocrine therapies.

MAIN METHODS

The ER expression status in PANC-1 and SW1990 pancreatic cancer cell lines was determined. SRB assay, colony formation assay and proliferation assay were used to investigate the responses of these cells to E2. ERα-selective agonist propylpyrazoletriol (PPT), ERβ-selective agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN), ERα over-expressed SW1990 cells, ERα knock-out PANC-1 cells and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were applied to investigate the potential roles of ERα in pancreatic cancer. The phosphorylation of ERα-related signaling molecules extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK1/2) and protein kinase B (AKT) were investigated. The in vivo anti-tumor efficacy and safety of letrozole (LTZ) combined with leuprorelin acetate (LA) and gemcitabine (GEM) were also preliminarily studied.

KEY FINDINGS

PANC-1 cells expressed much more ERα than SW1990 cells, and ERβ level was with less diversity. Accordingly, the proliferation of PANC-1 rather than SW1990 cells could be stimulated by E2, and only PANC-1 could respond to LTZ endocrine therapy in female but not male mice. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 but not AKT was altered by over-expressed or knocking out of ERα with or without the addition of E2 and LTZ. The combination therapy of LTZ and GEM showed acceptable efficacy and safety.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study showed the important roles of ERα in tumor progression and endocrine therapies of pancreatic cancer in women.

R269C variant of ESR1: high prevalence and differential function in a subset of pancreatic cancers

Background

Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) plays a critical role in promoting growth of various cancers. Yet, its role in the development of pancreatic cancer is not well-defined. A less studied region of ESR1 is the hinge region, connecting the ligand binding and DNA domains. rs142712646 is a rare SNP in ESR1, which leads to a substitution of arginine to cysteine at amino acid 269 (R269C). The mutation is positioned in the hinge region of ESR1, hence may affect the receptor structure and function. We aimed to characterize the activity of R269C-ESR1 and study its role in the development of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Transcriptional activity was evaluated by E2-response element (ERE) and AP1 –luciferase reporter assays and qRT-PCR. Proliferation and migration were assessed using MTT and wound healing assays. Gene-expression analysis was performed using RNAseq.

Results

We examined the presence of this SNP in various malignancies, using the entire database of FoundationOne and noted enrichment of it in a subset of pancreatic non-ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 2800) compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as well as other tumor types (0.53% vs 0.29%, p = 0.02). Studies in breast and pancreatic cancer cells indicated cell type-dependent activity of ESR1 harboring R269C. Thus, expression of R269C-ESR1 enhanced proliferation and migration of PANC-1 and COLO-357 pancreatic cancer cells but not of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Moreover, R269C-ESR1 enhanced E2-response elements (ERE) and AP1-dependent transcriptional activity and increased mRNA levels of ERE and AP1-regulated genes in pancreatic cancer cell lines, but had a modest effect on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Accordingly, whole transcriptome analysis indicated alterations of genes associated with tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer cells and upregulation of genes associated with cell metabolism and hormone biosynthesis in breast cancer cells.

Conclusions

Our study shed new light on the role of the hinge region in regulating transcriptional activity of the ER and indicates cell-type specific activity, namely increased activity in pancreatic cancer cells but reduced activity in breast cancer cells. While rare, the presence of rs142712646 may serve as a novel genetic risk factor, and a possible target for therapy in a subset of non-ductal pancreatic cancers.

Clinical significance of stromal ER and PR expression in periampullary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen treatment has previously been reported to confer life-prolonging effects in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and most evidently so in women. None of these trials did however include biomarkers, and the relevance of female hormone signaling in pancreatic or other periampullary adenocarcinoma remains largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to examine the extent and potential clinical significance of estrogen receptor-α (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in pancreatic and other periampullary cancers.

METHODS

ER and PR expression was examined using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays with primary tumors from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 175 patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, with long-term clinical follow-up. Non-parametric and Chi square tests were applied to examine the associations of stromal ER and PR expression with patient and tumor characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test were applied to illustrate survival differences in relation to ER and PR expression. Cox regression proportional hazards models were applied to examine the associations between investigative factors and risk of death and recurrence, and to test for interactions between KRAS mutation status and hormone receptor expression in relation to survival.

RESULTS

Expression of both ER and PR was more frequent in the tumor-associated stroma than in the epithelium. A significant prognostic interaction, independent of tumor morphology, was found between stromal PR expression and KRAS mutation status in relation to both overall and recurrence-free survival (pinteraction = 0.026 and pinteraction = 0.005), in particular in women (pinteraction = 0.002 and pinteraction = 0.005). Specifically, stromal PR expression was associated with a prolonged survival in patients with KRAS-mutated tumors, whereas the opposite was seen for KRAS wild-type tumors. The prognostic value of ER positivity was limited to the subgroup of women with tumors of pancreatic origin.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that stromal PR rather than ER expression, together with KRAS mutation status, provides long-term prognostic information in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma. Further study into the mechanistic basis for these observations may unveil important clues to the pathogenesis of these cancers and open up for the discovery of novel treatment options.

Tamoxifen inhibits the proliferation of non‑melanoma skin cancer cells by increasing intracellular calcium concentration

Tamoxifen is an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist used as first-line chemotherapy in breast cancer. Recent studies suggest that tamoxifen may be effective not only for ER‑positive but also for ER‑negative cancer cases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the antiproliferative effect of tamoxifen against human non‑melanoma skin cancer cells. Tamoxifen inhibited the proliferation of the skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines A431, DJM‑1 and HSC‑1. A431 cells did not express ER‑α or -β, suggesting that tamoxifen may exert antiproliferative effects on skin SCC cells via a non‑ER‑mediated pathway. Tamoxifen increased the intracellular calcium concentration of skin SCC cells, and this increase in intracellular calcium concentration by calcium ionophore A23187 suppressed the proliferation of skin SCC cells. These data indicate that tamoxifen inhibited the proliferation of human skin SCC cells via increasing intracellular calcium concentration. Voltage-gated calcium channels and non‑selective cation channels are involved in the increase in intracellular calcium concentration induced by tamoxifen. The broad-spectrum protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor phloretin significantly attenuated the antiproliferative effect of tamoxifen on skin SCC cells. From these data, it may be concluded that tamoxifen inhibits the proliferation of skin SCC cells by induction of extracellular calcium influx via calcium channels in the plasma membrane and by subsequent activation of PKC.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate-derived preclinical pancreatic cancer models reveal panitumumab sensitivity in KRAS wild-type tumors

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is largely refractory to existing therapies used in unselected patient trials, thus emphasizing the pressing need for new approaches for patient selection in personalized medicine. KRAS mutations occur in 90% of PC patients and confer resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (e.g., panitumumab), suggesting that KRAS wild-type PC patients may benefit from targeted panitumumab therapy. Here, we use tumor tissue procured by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate (EUS-FNA) to compare the in vivo sensitivity in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of KRAS wild-type and mutant PC tumors to panitumumab, and to profile the molecular signature of these tumors in patients with metastatic or localized disease. Specifically, RNASeq of EUS-FNA-derived tumor RNA from localized (n = 20) and metastatic (n = 20) PC cases revealed a comparable transcriptome profile. Screening the KRAS mutation status of tumor genomic DNA obtained from EUS-FNAs stratified PC patients into either KRAS wild-type or mutant cohorts, and the engraftment of representative KRAS wild-type and mutant EUS-FNA tumor samples into NOD/SCID mice revealed that the growth of KRAS wild-type, but not mutant, PDXs was selectively suppressed with panitumumab. Furthermore, in silico transcriptome interrogation of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-derived KRAS wild-type (n = 38) and mutant (n = 132) PC tumors revealed 391 differentially expressed genes. Taken together, our study validates EUS-FNA for the application of a novel translational pipeline comprising KRAS mutation screening and PDXs, applicable to all PC patients, to evaluate personalized anti-EGFR therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.

Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Pancreatic cancer: from pathogenesis to cure

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. The disease has a high mortality rate and the 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 4%. Currently, surgical resection is only possible in 20% of patients; even then, the overall 5-year survival rate is only 25%. As such, surgical therapy alone is not sufficient for pancreatic carcinoma, and prospective investigation of additional modalities is crucial. Numerous negative trials have shown that chemotherapy alone is the standard of care after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. However, results remain poor and progress with new drugs is needed in this setting. For locally advanced disease, the situation is more complicated; the ideal chemoradiation schedule has not been clearly defined, and improvements could come in the near future from the use of new radiotherapy tools and targeted therapies. For advanced disease, chemotherapy alone has given very disappointing results. A multidisciplinary approach combining biological assessment of targets with clinical trials to evaluate new targeted drugs should be considered.

Estrogen receptor beta/alpha ratio predicts response of pancreatic cancer cells to estrogens and phytoestrogens

BACKGROUND

Reports on hormone receptor expression of pancreatic cancer (PaCa) cells and treatment responses to antihormonal therapy are conflicting. We examined estrogen receptor (ER) expression in PaCa cells and investigated its function in estrogen-mediated cell proliferation.

METHODS

Protein levels of ERalpha and ERbeta in 8 human PaCa lines were detected by Western blot analysis. Cell proliferation was measured by sulforhodamine B analysis. ER modulators included diethylstilbestrol (DES), estradiol (E2), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (Tam), genistein (Gen), and Coumestrol (Coum).

RESULTS

ERalpha levels were detected in all eight, and ERbeta in seven cell lines. ERbeta/ERalpha ratio ranged from 0.4 to 111 (median: 6.4, >5 in seven lines). Median maximal growth stimulation (in %, observed at 20 to 200 nM) was 19 (DES), 39 (E2), 20 (Tam), 22 (Gen), and -9 (Coum); median maximal inhibition (at 40 to 60 microM) was 59 (DES), 36 (E2), 25 (Tam), 43 (Gen), and 50 (Coum). The extent of E2 and Gen stimulatory effects correlated with the ERbeta/ERalpha ratio (Kendall's tau: 0.714, P = 0.024), but not ERalpha or ERbeta levels alone. Only Coum-induced inhibition correlated with the ERbeta/ERalpha ratio (P = 0.006) and with ERalpha expression (r = 0.753, P = 0.03). Gemcitabine-induced PaCa cytotoxicity (at IC(40)) was significantly reduced by E2, Gen, and Coum.

CONCLUSIONS

PaCa proliferation in vitro is highly estrogen sensitive, and in contrast to other reports, ERs are frequently expressed. In 7/8 cell lines, ERbeta expression outweighs ERalpha expression. The impact of the ERbeta/ERalpha ratio on estrogen-mediated growth stimulation and reduced cytotoxicity at physiological concentrations may have clinical implications on PaCa therapy.

Estrogen receptors in pancreatic tumors

OBJECTIVES

Although a potential role for estrogen receptors (ER) in pancreatic tumors has been debated for many years, the importance of the receptors in these neoplasms remains unknown. Even the expression of the 2 ER isoforms, ER-alpha and ER-beta, in histological subtypes of pancreatic neoplasms is controversial. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the available literature about ER expression in pancreatic tumors and to discuss the potential importance of estrogen signaling in them.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search and analyzed the results regarding ER expression in pancreatic tumors, with special emphasis on the specificity of the antibodies used for immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Many articles have been published investigating the expression of ERs in pancreatic tumors, but the results are inconsistent. Moreover, most studies used antibodies that detected only ER-alpha, not ER-beta. Thus, the expression pattern of ER-beta in pancreatic neoplasm remains especially unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of detailed studies evaluating the expression of both ER-alpha and ER-beta receptors using isoform-specific antibodies likely contributes to the inconsistency of published results concerning ER expression in pancreatic tumors. Available published evidence suggests that a thorough reexamination of the potential role of ERs in pancreatic neoplasms is warranted.

Flutamide in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of flutamide on survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This single institution, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study compared flutamide in the dose of 250 mg three times daily (n = 23) versus placebo (n = 23) in patients with histologically proven, previously untreated unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary endpoints included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, performance status and response rate.

RESULTS

Both the groups were well matched with regards to demographic, disease related and treatment variables. This small sample sized study, failed to demonstrate a dramatic effect on survival with the use of flutamide. Median overall survival was 151 days with the use of flutamide as compared to 136 with placebo (p = 0.51). The 6-month survival rate was 39.13% in both arms of study and 1-year survival was 4.35% versus 13.04% for the flutamide group. There was no statistically significant difference in time to deterioration of performance status (flutamide 90 days versus placebo 68 days, p = 0.59) and all patients died as a result of tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-androgen drug flutamide in the dose of 250 mg three times daily does not appear to prolong overall survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Chemoprevention for pancreatic cancer

For a number of solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer, efforts aimed at disease prevention may be more successful than currently available anticancer treatments. While specific interventions are emerging to prevent breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, no trials of chemoprevention are being conducted in pancreatic cancer. Importantly, there are significant obstacles to the conduct of such research. However, preclinical and epidemiologic studies suggest that several drugs may have chemopreventive potential in pancreatic cancer. These include aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, somatostatin analogs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and anti-androgenic agents. As the oncology community evaluates some of these agents in large chemoprevention trials for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, it may be found that pancreatic cancer prevention occurs as an unintended, but desirable consequence. Moreover, other general societal trends, such as smoking cessation and the widespread use of cholesterol-lowering agents and aspirin, could have a role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, and in the future, may lead to a decrease in its incidence.

Placebo effects in oncology

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that placebo treatment can have positive effects on a variety of disorders and disease-related symptoms. However, the methodology used to collect and interpret the data may not have been ideal, because the studies were not double-blinded or the endpoints were not properly validated. The purpose of the present study was to determine the probability of improvement in symptoms or quality of life and tumor response in cancer patients treated with placebos in randomized controlled trials. We hypothesized that administration of placebos would improve symptom control and quality of life but would not lead to tumor response.

METHODS

We reviewed reports of randomized controlled trials in which there was a placebo arm (37 trials) or a best supportive care (BSC) arm (10 trials).

RESULTS

In trials that assessed average responses for patients in the placebo arm, improvements in average levels of pain were reported in two of six trials and in appetite, in one of seven trials. No improvements in average levels of weight gain (six trials), in quality of life (as assessed by patients; 10 trials), or in performance status (as assessed by physicians; nine trials) were reported. In trials that assessed response to a placebo in individual patients, 0%-21% of patients showed reduced pain or decreased analgesic intake, 8%-27% of patients showed appetite improvement, 7%-17% of patients showed weight gain, and 6%-14% of patients showed improvement in performance status. Quality of life for individual patients was not reported in any trial. Tumor response assessed by World Health Organization criteria was observed in 10 (2.7%) of 375 patients (seven trials total). Response as assessed by a serum marker was observed in 1 (1.7%) of 60 patients (two trials total). The probability of symptom improvement in patients receiving BSC was generally similar to that in patients receiving placebo, although no improvement in pain and only one tumor response among 191 patients (five trials) were reported.

CONCLUSION

In randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials, presumably with minimum sources of bias, placebos are sometimes associated with improved control of symptoms such as pain and appetite but rarely with positive tumor response. Substantial improvements in symptoms and quality of life are unlikely to be due to placebo effects.

Novel treatments and therapies in development for pancreatic cancer

Until recently, 5-fluorouracil was the most widely used treatment for non-resectable pancreatic cancer. This treatment, however, only resulted in a median survival time of approximately 4 months. In the last few years, gemcitabine has rapidly become the new treatment benchmark, due more to its superior clinical benefit rather than to it conferring an increased median survival (approximately 5-6 months). Thus, the outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer is still relatively bleak. A number of new treatment options are presently being investigated. Some of these are combination therapies involving gemcitabine and other chemotherapeutic agents or radiation. Other novel treatment strategies are also already being evaluated in clinical studies. Some of the more promising treatments in development are discussed and evaluated in this article.

A phase II study evaluating the tolerability and efficacy of CAELYX (liposomal doxorubicin, Doxil) in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies of liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX) have demonstrated significant inhibition of growth of human pancreatic cancer explants in nude mice. This study evaluated the efficacy of CAELYX in chemotherapy-naïve patients with unresectable, histologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma. Secondary endpoints were quality of life (QOL). time to progression and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients (median age 65) were enrolled. CAELYX was administered to the first five patients at a dose of 30 mg/m2 three-weekly. Two of these patients were dose escalated to 50 mg/m2 four-weekly. Subsequent patients were all treated on the latter schedule.

RESULTS

Two patients died after consenting to enter the study but before treatment was commenced and are not included in the analysis. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. No objective responses were seen. Six patients had stable disease. One patient experienced grade 4 toxicity with palmar plantar dysaesthesia (PPE), but continued treatment after dose reduction and delay. Four patients experienced grade 3 stomatitis and two grade 3 nausea. Median survival from time of starting chemotherapy was 3.2 months (range 21 days to 19 months) and one year survival was 10%. Eight patients completed at least two EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaires. There was no significant change in either global QOL or in any functional or symptom subscale score.

CONCLUSION

No objective responses were seen with CAELYX in this study. CAELYX was however associated with stable disease, but data were inconclusive with regard to clinical benefit. It warrants further investigation in the context of combination trials.

Novel clinical strategies for the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma ranks as the eighth most frequent type of solid tumour arising worldwide yet it represents the fourth most frequent cause of death. This discrepancy reflects the current lack of effective treatment available for the pancreatic cancer patient and highlights the urgent need for new therapeutic principles in this area. The last five years have seen an increasing number of novel approaches both in the pre-clinical area as well as in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer treatments. This review summarizes these new developments and attempts to rationalize the possibilities available for the patient at the beginning of the new millennium.

[Therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in the areas of epidemiology, risk factors, molecular genetics and diagnosis pancreatic carcinoma is characterized by a dismal prognosis and ranks 5th among malignancy-associated deaths. This article attempts to critically review the current literature and analyze therapeutic recommendations based on published evidence. Therapeutic options are based on the stage of the disease.

SURGICAL TREATMENT

Surgical resection with curative intention is feasible only in a minority of patients presenting with locally confined tumor disease. RADIO- AND CHEMOTHERAPY: Adjuvant combined radiochemotherapy might potentially improve survival and can also be considered in unresectable, locally advanced disease. The role of chemotherapy in advanced disease is exclusively palliative. Up to now, no chemotherapeutic regimen has demonstrated convincing impact on survival. Newer substances, such as gemcitabine, appear to be of some value in respect to quality of life. Best supportive care oriented at clinical symptoms remains a cornerstone in the therapeutic concept of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Development of innovative therapeutic strategies is therefore mandatory.

Treatment of cancer of the exocrine pancreas

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cancer of the exocrine pancreas varies among populations, being the fourth or fifth cause of cancer death in the West. Outcome remains poor and opinions remain divided over the optimal management of the condition.

METHOD

A computer literature search was made of the MEDLINE database from January 1990 to December 1997 and selected other studies.

RESULTS

Indications and contraindications for surgery, indications for stenting, indications for resection, the technique of palliative procedures and of resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments and other treatments are discussed and recommendations made.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of tumor size or spread, resection if feasible gives the best survival rates. Careful patient selection is required, however, to exclude those patients for whom surgical resection has no benefit. Nonsurgical procedures including endoscopic stenting in patients with high operative risk or short survival expectancy can significantly improve quality of life. The place of adjuvant therapies remains controversial and further controlled trials are required to demonstrate their efficacy.

Review article: current treatment and optimal patient management in pancreatic cancer

This review analyses the current state of knowledge and understanding concerning the optimum treatment and therapeutic management of patients who suffer from pancreatic cancer. It outlines recent advances in scientific understanding and assesses their potential future value to clinicians in confronting this disease. Despite a significant expansion in scientific knowledge relating to factors underlying the early development of pancreatic carcinoma, the clinician continues to be restricted to a severely limited therapeutic armoury for this disease. Local therapies (surgery and radiation) are inevitably of limited value in the face of a disease that is normally encountered at a stage where metastasis is already highly developed. Despite such limitations, however, surgery performed in specialist units may be of value for 10-20% of patients, with a 5-year survival rate in such units of between 10 and 24%. This may be improved even further by appropriate use of adjuvant treatment. The advanced stage of the disease when normally encountered emphasizes the potential value of systemic treatment in this therapeutic area. Unfortunately systemic treatment (chemotherapy) has been found to be ineffective to date in significantly extending survival, with a low rate and duration of remission being identified in most trials. The challenge for both the health service and the pharmaceutical industry is to harness recent and future developments in scientific knowledge to the practical benefit of clinicians. Where cure is possible it should be vigorously pursued; where it is not, in this field above all others, clinicians have a duty of care. To achieve this it is necessary to abandon the therapeutic nihilism that has characterized the attitudes of clinicians towards this disease in the past. It is time that such nihilism was replaced by a recognition of the challenges and the opportunities available to clinicians in enhancing the quantity and quality of life available to patients. The dictum of 'curing whenever possible but caring always' should be the future therapeutic philosophy used to guide clinicians in this important and rapidly changing therapeutic area.

Cell cycle regulation of human pancreatic cancer by tamoxifen

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have suggested a survival advantage for selected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with tamoxifen. We sought to identify the molecular mechanism by which tamoxifen inhibits human pancreatic cancer cell (HPCC) growth.

METHODS

HPCCs were grown in tamoxifen and growth inhibition was determined by 3H-thymidine uptake and by the MTT assay; changes in cell viability were determined by cell counts. Cell cycle alterations were evaluated by FACS, and the induction of apoptosis was evaluated using the TUNEL assay. Total cellular RNA was isolated after tamoxifen treatment, and Northern blot analysis was performed for p21waf1.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen inhibited HPCC growth as measured by inhibition of 3H-thymidine incorporation and by the MTT assay. However, there was no decrease in the total number of viable cells after 6 days of treatment with 10 microM of tamoxifen and no evident apoptosis, confirming the absence of a cytotoxic effect. Cell cycle analysis revealed cellular arrest in the G0/G1 phase, which correlated with p21waf1 mRNA upregulation in response to tamoxifen treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen inhibits HPCC growth by inducing G0/G1 arrest with an associated increase in p21waf1 mRNA expression. Tamoxifen is an effective inhibitor of HPCC growth in vitro and warrants further in vivo study.

[Fight against cancer of the exocrine pancreas: stagnation or progress? The point of view of the Fondation française de cancérologie digestive (FFCD)]

This paper updates recent trends concerning ductal pancreatic cancer. Knowledge of the cellular mechanisms has improved, and new developments in imaging allow a more accurate staging. Although operative mortality sharply decreased during these last 15 years, the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma remains dismal, due to late diagnosis, as only one out of ten patients is considered for curative resection. Therapeutic research groups, and among them the Fondation française de cancérologie digestive (FFCD), do their best to develop new therapeutic strategies, including post-operative or preferentially pre-operative radio-chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatments, and to improve chemotherapy in metastatic cancers.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer. Promises and problems of tamoxifen, somatostatin analogs, and gemcitabine

The clinical problem posed by pancreatic cancer is introduced, and the epidemiology and pathology of the disease are briefly presented. The natural history of this tumor is then described in order to highlight the deficiencies of current therapeutic modalities. The extremely poor results of the early drug trials are reviewed, followed by a detailed discussion and critique of the trials of novel treatments that include gemcitabine, somatostatin analogs, and tamoxifen. Finally, areas for future development are indicated.

Expression of oestrogen receptor and oestrogen-inducible genes in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have not been able to demonstrate convincingly whether the human pancreas expresses oestrogen receptor and whether there is any benefit from antioestrogen therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Oestrogen receptor expression was assessed in normal human pancreas and pancreatic cancer tissue by enzyme immunoassay, Northern blot analysis, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. The expression of the oestrogen-inducible proteins, progesterone receptor, pS2 and ERD5 was also examined.

RESULTS

A mean of 1.0 (range 0-2.4) fmol oestrogen receptor per mg protein was detected in normal pancreas and 0.5 (range 0-1.2) fmol mg-1 in pancreatic cancer. Messenger RNA for oestrogen receptor was detected in both normal and cancerous pancreas. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, however, failed to localize oestrogen receptor expression. Mean (range) expression of progesterone receptor in normal and neoplastic pancreas was 1.9 (0.5-3.5) and 2.5 (0.3-9.3) fmol mg-1 respectively. pS2 and ERD5 were also expressed in normal tissue and pancreatic cancer, and expression was localized to ductular epithelium.

CONCLUSION

The amount of oestrogen receptor detected in pancreatic tissue was small, and may account for previous difficulties in its detection. The extent to which it is functional in both the normal and malignant pancreas warrants further investigation.

Vitamin D receptors and anti-proliferative effects of vitamin D derivatives in human pancreatic carcinoma cells in vivo and in vitro

The GER human pancreatic carcinoma cell line possesses receptors for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. We report that the vitamin D analogue EB 1089 inhibits the growth of these cells in vitro and when grown as tumour xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Tumour-bearing mice were given EB 1089 at a dose of 5 microg kg(-1) body weight i.p. thrice weekly for 4-6 weeks. Tumour growth was significantly inhibited in treated animals compared with controls in the absence of hypercalcaemia. These findings may have therapeutic implications in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the most enigmatic and aggressive malignant disease facing oncologists. A precocious propensity to spread along peripancreatic neurons and lymphatic channels conspires with the limited activity of standard chemotherapeutic agents and the inability to deliver large doses of radiotherapy to the upper abdomen, leaving radical surgical resection as the primary treatment capable of influencing long-term survival. Theoretically, when the tumor is small and confined to the pancreas, adequate locoregional control is possible by radical resection of the tumor, lymph nodes, peripancreatic neurons, and surrounding soft tissue. Realistically, at the time of initial diagnosis, 50% of patients have distant metastases to the liver or peritoneal surface, and more than 80% of the remaining patients have locally advanced tumors. Fewer than 10% of all patients with a small pancreatic adenocarcinoma confined to the pancreas are candidates for cure by use of radical resection as the sole treatment modality. Given these sobering statistics on the late presentation of this tumor, it is not surprising that, even after radical resection, the overall median survival time is only 18 to 20 months and the overall 5-year survival is approximately 10%. These dismal results led to a call in the early 1970s for abandonment of radical therapy in this disease and for treatment of all patients with palliative care only. These statistics are discouraging, but over the last 10 years a therapeutic renaissance has erupted. This resurgence has been driven by surgeons performing pancreaticoduodenectomy with low perioperative mortality rates and excellent functional results. It has been fueled by the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy protocols. Improved radiographic imaging techniques such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, helical computed tomography scan, and endoscopic ultrasonography are beginning to show promise in facilitating an earlier diagnosis and in providing highly accurate tumor staging without operation. It is hoped that recent observations on the molecular genetics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma will lead to a better understanding of tumor biology, which in turn should result in a more rational application of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Effective percutaneous, endoscopic, and laparoscopic techniques have been developed concomitant with the recent advances in radiographic and endoscopic imaging. These minimally invasive options can now provide meaningful, long-lasting palliation and improved quality of life for the large number of patients with unresectable or metastatic disease who have no other treatment options. The therapeutic nihilism so pervasive in previous decades has no place in the contemporary treatment of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. True long-term survival seems possible for a growing proportion of patients, and minimally invasive, effective palliation is achievable in the vast majority of patients. It is only through aggressive recruitment of patients for treatment, application of novel diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, and further laboratory investigation into the biology of pancreatic cancer that the momentum of the last decade toward improved outcome and quality of life can be sustained.

Pancreatic carcinoma in perspective. A continuing challenge

There are approximately 27,000 new cases of carcinoma of the pancreas each year and most afflicted patients will die of the disease. Although smoking is a common denominator, chronic pancreatitis is considered an important precursor lesion in a smaller number of cancers. Pancreatic cancer is primarily a disease of the pancreatic ducts. The molecular events are under intense study, but c-K-ras mutation is involved in approximately 80% of the cases and p53 to a slightly lesser degree (60-80%). Early manifestations are usually occult, but jaundice is a common manifestation in patients with cancers of the pancreatic head. Thin-slice computed tomography, portography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are currently the most sensitive detection techniques. The developing use of endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy appear to enhance detection and are under evaluation. In many patients with advanced disease, endoscopic bypass may eliminate the need for unnecessary surgery, although gastrointestinal bypass is still required in some patients (10-15%). Curative resection is possible in selected patients (perhaps 10-15%), with expectation of extended survival ranging from 6->20% in some series. The survival differences may be related to stage, patient selection, and the expertise of the operative team. Preoperative chemotherapy/radiation is under study and may improve outcome. Clinical trial participation is essential for improvement in treatment outcomes.

Chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease and its patients typically have a short survival, usually marked by pain and rapid debilitation. The disease has been considered relatively chemoresistant, although many chemotherapy regimens have been described.

METHODS

Clinical results with chemotherapy, since the first publication of response in 1960, were reviewed for efficacy and toxicity. Emphasis was given to prospective trials with adequate power and clear evaluation criteria and endpoints.

RESULTS

Published response rates vary enormously in this disease, with rates in earlier single-institution trials tending to be much higher than those in studies with stringent response criteria, particularly recent cooperative group trials. Using stringent criteria, the upper limit of the objective response rate is approximately 20%. No convincing improvements in median survival can yet be attributed to chemotherapy. Few trials have measured quality of life, but symptomatic palliation rates may exceed objective response rates. Some low-toxicity regimens (such as those based on infusional 5-FU) yield response rates as high as some more toxic combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Many early trials significantly overstate the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer, apparently due to flexibility of response criteria. However, useful symptomatic palliation may occur even without an objective partial response. It is possible that slow resolution of the desmoplastic component of these tumors may underestimate tumor killing. Thus, quality of life is an important parallel endpoint (with survival and response) in chemotherapy trials in this disease.

Staging of carcinoma of the pancreas and ampulla of Vater. Tumor (T), lymph node (N), and distant metastasis (M) as prognostic factors

Between 1984 and 1987, 472 Norwegian patients with histologically or cytologically verified carcinoma of the pancreas (N = 442) and ampulla of Vater (N = 30) were accrued and TNM staged according to UICC. The influence of the T, N, and M categories on long-term survival was evaluated. The T1a and T1b tumors of stage I pancreatic carcinoma had a comparable survival (p = 0.68-0.95). A higher T category (T1-T3) predicted a more dismal prognosis (p = 0.000). The T1 and T2 carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater had a comparable favorable prognosis, and the T3 and T4 tumors had a comparable unfavorable prognosis. The N1 vs N0 (p = 0.000-0.01) and M1 vs M0 categories (p = 0.00-0.003) predicted a more dismal prognosis for both pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma. By logistic regression analyses, pancreatic tumor extension into peripancreatic fat or nerves and invasion of ampullary carcinomas into duodenal wall, unfavorably influenced the N1 category (p = 0.000-0.04) and tumor diameter influenced the M1 category (p = 0.002-0.04) both for pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma. The T, N, and M categories all independently influenced survival of pancreatic carcinoma (p = 0.000-0.003). Only the N category (p = 0.01) influenced the prognosis of ampullary carcinomas.

No standard treatment is available for advanced pancreatic cancer

All randomised trials, published from 1980 to 1993, of treatments in advanced and locally unresectable exocrine pancreatic carcinoma were critically reviewed to identify the most effective therapeutic strategy for use as a control arm in randomised trials for such patients. All the published randomised trials on patients with pancreatic cancer were identified, and the treatment results summarised by means of published methodological guidelines. Twenty-seven reports, including 21 on hormonal or chemotherapy and six on radio/chemotherapy were identified. Very different treatment programmes were used in the trials, without a rationale sequence for testing hypotheses. Furthermore, several methodological drawbacks undermined both the internal and the external validity of these studies. Therefore, no meta-analysis can be conducted, combining the results of the randomised controlled trials in pancreatic cancer published from 1990 to 1993; no standard treatment is currently available for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer; future studies should screen new drugs or new combinations; and an untreated control group should be included in future comparative studies until real advantages in terms of better quality of life or improved survival are demonstrated.

Palliation of pancreatic cancer. A prospective multicentre study

The aim of this study was to compare palliation of patients with verified pancreatic carcinoma after radical surgery (n = 84), bypass surgery, i.e. biliary (n = 106), biliary and duodenal (n = 85), and for patients with advanced disease, i.e. laparotomy alone (n = 56), not operated (n = 106), 3 months after discharge from hospital. 128 of 233 patients (55%) still alive were followed up. Radically resected patients had the best palliation and clinical performance; on average they could perform normal activities if helped, 82% were mobile at home and 62% were pain-free. Bypassed patients can on average look after themselves but normal activities are not possible, 31% were in hospital, 26% were pain-free and 39% suffered from nausea and vomiting. Patients with advanced disease were on average incapable and required special help and care, about 70% were in hospital, 8-17% were pain-free. 'Good risk' bypassed patients, i.e. in stage I-III, used stronger analgesics (29 vs 3%) (P = 0.006) and more frequently complained of nausea and vomiting (38 vs 12%) (P = 0.02) than radically resected patients. Palliation was comparable for the two bypassed groups.

Tissue-type plasminogen activator predicts endocrine responsiveness of human pancreatic carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor (ER) has been found in human pancreatic carcinoma, but the potential benefit of endocrine therapy never has been assessed adequately. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of ER can be used as an indicator of hormone responsiveness, and whether modulation of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) by ER can identify hormone-responsive pancreatic carcinomas.

METHODS

The authors investigated ER status and hormonal regulation of t-PA in nine human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, AsPC-1, BxPC-3, Capan-1, Capan-2, Hs-700T, Hs-766T, MiaPaCa-2, PANC-1, and SUIT-2. Furthermore, to examine whether estrogen dependency of t-PA production in pancreatic carcinoma cells correlated with responsiveness to endocrine therapy, the in vivo effects of various endocrine agents on the growth of the nine pancreatic cell lines transplanted into nude mice were examined.

RESULTS

In a 17 beta-estradiol (E2)-binding assay, three of the nine pancreatic carcinoma cell lines (BxPC-3, Capan-2, and MiaPaCa-2) contained measurable levels of estradiol binding sites in vitro and in vivo using tumors transplanted into nude mice. Although t-PA was present in the culture medium in eight of the nine pancreatic carcinoma cell lines (not in Hs-700T), t-PA production was regulated by estrogen via an ER system in vitro only in the Capan-2 cell line. E2 injection into tumor-bearing mice showed acceleration of tumor growth only in Capan-2 tumors. Administration of a competitive ER antagonist, toremifene, and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue, leuprorelin acetate (LEU), to Capan-2-bearing mice significantly reduced the rate of tumor growth, although there was no actual shrinkage of tumor mass. These agents failed to exert any antitumor effect on the other eight pancreatic cell lines. Although aromatase inhibitors, CGS 20267 and vorozole did not modify the in vivo growth of the nine pancreatic carcinoma cell lines significantly, the combined use of aromatase inhibitors with LEU exhibited a synergistic antitumor effect on Capan-2-bearing mice. Medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment significantly reduced the tumor volume of Capan-2 and also caused delayed growth in two other cell lines, AsPC-1 and MiaPaCa-2.

CONCLUSIONS

The estrogen dependency of t-PA production may clarify the functional state of ER in human pancreatic carcinoma cells. This finding may aid in planning endocrine therapy for patients with this lethal cancer.

Current management of pancreatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The author seeks to provide an update on the current management of pancreatic carcinoma, including diagnosis and staging, surgical resection and adjuvant therapy for curative intent, and palliation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

During the 1960s and 1970s, the operative mortality and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma was so poor that some authors advocated abandoning the procedure. Several recent series have reported a marked improvement in perioperative results with 5-year survival in excess of 20%. Significant advances also have been made in areas of preoperative evaluation and palliation for advanced disease.

CONCLUSION

Although carcinoma of the pancreas remains a disease with a poor prognosis, advances in the last decade have led to improvements in the overall management of this disease. Resection for curative intent currently should be accomplished with minimal perioperative mortality. Surgical palliation also may provide the optimal management of selected patients.

Hormonal therapy of pancreatic carcinoma. Rationale and perspectives

Exocrine pancreas carcinoma is still diagnosed at a relatively late stage, so that only a few cases can be cured by surgery. Therefore, it is desirable that an effective medical therapy be found first to stall the development of the disease and second to improve the life conditions of patients. On the basis of recent discoveries, a new therapeutic approach seems to derive from hormone manipulation. The growth of pancreatic carcinoma appears to be stimulated by various factors, such as Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), and by various hormones, such as androgens and cholecystokinin. Several studies performed on cell lines and on animal models of pancreatic carcinoma demonstrated an antitumoral effect of certain antihormones and of somatostatin. Taking such studies as a premise, the first clinical studies were finally started in patients suffering from nonoperable pancreatic cancer. Results are still partial and contradictory, but such research is certainly worthy of further study along the lines already taken.

Morbidity and mortality after radical and palliative pancreatic cancer surgery. Risk factors influencing the short-term results

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the morbidity and mortality after radical and palliative pancreatic cancer surgery in Norway, especially the risk factors.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A prospective multicenter study between 1984-1987 including only histologically or cytologically verified adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (N = 442) or the papilla of Vater (N = 30); 84 patients (19%) with pancreatic carcinoma and 24 patients (80%) with papilla carcinoma underwent radical operations. A palliative procedure was performed in 252 patients (53%).

METHODS

Clinical data, surgical procedures and the following morbidity and mortality were recorded on standardized forms. The risk factors were analyzed by a logistic multiple regression model.

RESULTS

The morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates were 43, 18, and 11% after radical surgery and 23, 4, and 14% after palliative surgery. Karnofsky's index was the sole independent risk factor for death after radical surgery. Splenectomy, age, and TNM stage influenced morbidity. Diabetes, Karnofsky's index, and liver metastases were risk factors in palliative surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity and mortality risks were comparable between total pancreatectomy and a Whipple's procedure and between biliary and a double bypass. Preoperative biliary drainage had no impact on the risks and may be abandoned. High age is a relative and a low Karnofsky's index an absolute contraindication for radical surgery. Nonsurgical palliation of jaundice should be considered according to the presence of independent risk factors.

Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

A consecutive series of 36 Japanese patients with ampullary carcinoma who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy at the Department of Surgery I, Kyushu University Hospital during the past 20 years were reviewed clinicopathologically to study prognostic factors. A univariate generalized Wilcoxon test showed that preoperative serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) concentration, venous invasion, lymphatic permeation and perineural invasion were significant parameters. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that venous invasion was the only significant variable. In a sequential serum CEA follow up of 10 patients, an elevation of serum CEA levels was seen to correspond to the clinical development of a recurrence in six, while a high concentration of serum CEA was not evident despite the clinical manifestation of a recurrence in two, and serum CEA levels remained within the normal limits with no evidence of a recurrence in two others. According to the death certificates of 15 patients, where an exact site of metastasis was available, 11 died from liver metastasis, three from lung metastasis and one from peritoneal dissemination. These findings support the theory that a histologic invasion of the venous space is an independent prognostic factor and close attention should be paid to any signs of haematogenous metastasis, such as to the liver and lung, as well as to a serial serum CEA follow up.

Survival benefit of tamoxifen therapy in adenocarcinoma of pancreas. A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Clinical data suggest tamoxifen may improve the survival of patients with unresectable ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas.

METHODS

Eighty patients (50 women and 30 men) with biopsy-documented unresectable or incompletely resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with 20 mg of tamoxifen twice daily. The survival of the tamoxifen-treated group was compared with that of a case-control group of another 80 patients with pancreatic cancer, matched for age, sex, TNM stage, and bypass procedure versus biopsy.

RESULTS

The median survival times for the tamoxifen-treated group versus controls were 7 and 3 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). For women older than 60 years of age and treated with tamoxifen, the median survival time was 12 months. Multivariate analysis of the 160 patients showed that tamoxifen therapy, female sex, absence of metastases at diagnosis, and bypass procedure are all of independent prognostic significance for prolonged survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas may have a prolonged survival benefit while receiving tamoxifen treatment. This potential benefit is most prominent in older women.

Clinical trial of tamoxifen in patients with irresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The Yorkshire Gastrointestinal Tumour Group

Oestrogen-binding sites are present in tissue samples of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that survival of patients with this tumour may be extended by using the antioestrogen drug tamoxifen. Forty-four patients with biopsy-proven irresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were recruited into a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. All patients were assessed at the time of diagnosis and at monthly intervals using the Karnofsky and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores for quality of life. Analysis of survival by life-tables and the log rank test revealed no significant difference in the duration of survival of patients treated with tamoxifen or placebo. Quality-of-life assessment revealed no significant difference between the groups. Tamoxifen does not confer significant benefit to patients with irresectable pancreatic cancer.