Penetrating visceral injuries of the neck: results of a conservative management policy

A hunting arrow traumatism to the head: A case report from Niger

Key Clinical Message

Arrow injuries have not disappeared in our environment despite the advances in the development of warfare tools in the world. All regions of the body can be the target of these arrows and in particular the cephalic region whose gravity will depend on the structures reached.

Abstract

With the development of modern weapons of war, arrow wounds have become rare in developed countries, but they are still common in developing countries, including Niger. These injuries are often serious and life-threatening when they are in the head and neck region, due to the presence of major vessels and vital organs in these areas of the body. Extraction of these arrows is usually difficult due to the proximity of major vital structures. Unskilled extraction can aggravate the injury or result in unintentional damage to vital structures with imminent risk of death. We present the case of a patient with a homemade arrow to the head in the left periorbital region that we successfully extracted at the National Hospital in Niamey. Our objective is to highlight the experience with this patient and review some reports in the literature.

5-Year management and outcomes of penetrating neck injury in a trauma center. Penetrating neck injury

BACKGROUND

Penetrating neck injuries represent 5-10% of all traumatic injuries, these bring with them a high rate of morbidity and mortality due to vital structures that could be injured in this area. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of penetrating neck injuries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, unicentric and descriptive study that included all patients who underwent neck exploration surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 70 neck exploration cases were reviewed, 34 (49%) didn't had any injury. Thirty (43%) had at least one hard sign, 42 (60%) patients showed at least one soft sign. Statistical analysis showed only surgical time (252±199.5 vs. 155±76.4; p=0.020) and transfusions (1.87±3 vs. 0.4±0.856; p=0.013) were statistically significant. We report a mortality of 2 (3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prevalence of neck surgical exploration without vascular injury was slightly higher (49% vs. 40%) than literature. We highlight the importance of not performing neck explorations in all patients who present a penetrating injury. We did not obtain differences between groups for hard signs and soft signs. We were not able to identify whether or not there would be an injury based on clinical characteristics. Imaging studies should be performed to avoid unnecessary neck explorations; however, depending on the clinical scenario some surgery cannot be avoided.

Penetrating Arrow Injuries of the Head-and-Neck Region: Case Series and Review of Literature

Penetrating arrow injuries of the head-and-neck region are rare in the developed countries, but they are common in the rural communities of our country. Arrow shot to the head-and-neck region can be life-threatening due to the presence of major vessels and vital organs. Management of arrow injury to the head-and-neck region is seriously challenging, extraction of the arrows are usually difficult due to the proximity to vital structures, unskilled removal may worsen the existing injury or result in inadvertent damage to the vital structures. We presented the four cases of arrow shot to the head-and-neck region, three were managed successfully, and one was brought in dead probably due to attempt at the removal at home or poisonous nature of the arrow. Therefore, the aim of this report is to highlight our experience and challenges in the management of penetrating arrow injuries to head-and-neck region and to review some literature reports.

Diagnosis, management and treatment of neck trauma

Trauma injuries to the neck account for 5-10% of all trauma injuries and carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality, as several vital structures can be damaged. Currently, there are several treatment approaches based on initial management by zones, initial management not based on zones and conservative management of selected patients. The objective of this systematic review is to describe the management of neck trauma.

Selective nonoperative management of pharyngoesophageal injuries secondary to penetrating neck trauma: A single-center review of 86 cases

BACKGROUND

This article describes our experience with penetrating pharyngoesophageal injuries (PEI) in the light of a selective conservative approach, and has the objective to define criteria for nonoperative management (NOM).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center review of patients with penetrating neck injury treated for confirmed PEI over a 6-year period aimed to test our proposed hypothesis that NOM is safe for hemodynamically stable patients with PEI, who have no competing indications for exploration, have no established sepsis, and who have a water-soluble contrast swallow either showing no- or a contained extravasation.

RESULTS

Eighty-six (9%) patients with PEI (oropharynx, 17; hypopharynx, 40; esophagus, 29) of 948 patients with penetrating neck injury were included. Of the cohort 38 (44%) underwent NOM (oropharynx, 15 [88%]; hypopharynx, 18 [45%]; esophagus, 5 [17%]), and 48 (56%) were managed operatively. The median length of stay was 12 days (interquartile range, 19-8). Fifteen (17%) had a persistent leak and six (7%) mediastinitis. Five (6%) patients died but only one (1%) had isolated PEI. Retrospectively, 27 patients fulfilled our proposed criteria for NOM of which 23 had been treated actively by NOM (oropharynx, 8; hypopharynx, 12; esophagus, 3). For these patients, the length of stay was 10.0 days (interquartile range, 13-6), and none developed deep wound sepsis, mediastinitis, persistent leaks, or died. Of the remaining patients treated by NOM without fulfilling the proposed criteria, two were palliated (esophagus) and 13 were managed actively (oropharynx, 7; hypopharynx, 6). Only four of these patients (oropharynx, 1; hypopharynx, 3) were assessed with water-soluble contrast swallow, which showed noncontained extravasation, and three complicated with persistent leaks.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative management of PEI is safe for a carefully selected subgroup of patients. However, most injuries to the caudal part of the cervical digestive tract mandate urgent exploration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Clinical Management Study, Level V evidence.

Blunt Pharyngoesophageal Injuries: Current Management Strategies

BACKGROUND:

Blunt pharyngoesophageal injuries pose a management challenge to the trauma surgeon. The purpose of this study was to explore whether these injuries can be managed expectantly without neck exploration.

METHODS:

The National Trauma Databank datasets 2007-2011 were reviewed for blunt trauma patients who sustained a pharyngeal injury, including an injury to the cervical esophagus. Patients who survived over 24 h and were not transferred from other institutions were divided into two groups based on whether a neck exploration was performed. Outcomes included mortality and hospital stay.

RESULTS:

A total of 545 (0.02%) patients were identified. The median age was 18 years and 69% were male. Facial fractures were found in 16%, while 13% had an associated traumatic brain injury. Of the 284 patients who survived over 24 h and were not transferred from another institution, 65 (23%) underwent a neck exploration. The injury burden was significantly higher in this group as indicated by the higher median Injury Severity Score (17 vs 10, p < 0.01) and need for intensive care unit admission (75% vs 31%, p < 0.01). The overall mortality was 2%: 3.1% for neck explorations versus 1.6% for conservative management (adjusted p = 0.54). Neck exploration patients were more likely to remain longer in the hospital (median 13 vs 10 days, adjusted p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

Pharyngoesophageal injuries are rare following blunt trauma. Only a quarter require a neck exploration and this decision appears to be dictated by the injury burden. Selective non-operative management based on clinical status seems to be feasible and is not associated with increased mortality.

Penetrating neck injury: a review

Penetrating injury to the neck has inspired considerable controversy with regard to its management, owing to the large number of important, susceptible structures contained in this area. Mandatory exploration of all wounds has generally given way to selective operative management. Clinical assessment has, once again, become the prime diagnostic tool. This review describes the evolution of management and the value of various diagnostic modalities. It concludes with a summary of appropriate operative techniques.

Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma

BACKGROUND

Selective management of penetrating neck injuries has been considered the standard of care with minimal risks to patient safety. In a previous non-randomized prospective study conducted at our center, selective management proved to be safe and reduced unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies. In the present study, the role of clinical examination and selective diagnostic tests were assessed by reviewing demographic and clinical data. A comparison of results between two groups (mandatory surgical exploration versus selective surgical exploration) was made to check the safety of selective management in terms of the rates of morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis at the Emergency Department of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of Sao Paulo was performed by a chart review of our trauma registry, identifying 161 penetrating neck trauma victims.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients, 81.6 % were stabbed and 18.4 % had gunshot injuries. Stratifying the wound entry points by neck zones, we observed that zone I was penetrated in 32.8 %, zone II in 44.1 % and zone III in 23.1 % of all the cases. Thirty one patients (19.2 %) had immediate surgical exploration, which had a mean length of stay of 6 days, a complication rate of 12.9 % and a mortality rate of 9.4 %. Of the 130 who underwent selective surgical exploration 34 (26.1 %) required operative procedures after careful physical examination and diagnostic testing based on clinical indications. The mean length of stay for the selective surgical exploration group was 2 days with a complication rate of 17.6 % with no mortality, and virtually all of them were related to associated injuries in distant body segment. No statistical significance was found comparing mortality and complication rates between the two groups. Selective approach avoided 59 % of unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies.

CONCLUSION

Careful evaluation of asymptomatic and stable patients with minor signs of injury can safely avoid unnecessary neck explorations with low rates of morbidity. This should be the standard management of such patients.

An audit of penetrating neck injuries in a South African trauma service

INTRODUCTION

This study reviews and validates the practice of selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating neck injury (PNI) in a South African trauma service and reviews the impact new imaging modalities have had on the management of this injury.

METHODOLOGY

This study was performed within the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, in the city of Pietermaritzburg, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. A prospectively maintained trauma registry was retrospectively interrogated. All patients with PNI treated over a 46-month period were included within the study.

RESULTS

A total of 510 patients were included in the study. There were 452 stab wounds (SW) and 58 gunshot wounds (GSW). A total of 202 (40%) patients sustained isolated PNI, the remaining 308 (60%) patients sustained trauma to at least one additional anatomical region. An airway injury was identified in 29 (6%) patients; a pharyngo-oesophageal injury in 41 (8%) patients and a vascular injury in 86 (17%) patients. Associated injuries included three penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) and 146 patients with haemo-pneumothoraces. Of the total cohort, 387 patients (76%) underwent CT Angiography (CTA), of which 70 (18%) demonstrated a vascular injury. Formal catheter directed angiogram (CDA) was performed on 16 patients with positive CTA but confirmed injury in only half of these patients. Of 212 patients (42%) who underwent water-soluble contrast swallow (WS-swallow), an injury was demonstrated in 29 (14%) cases. A total of 401 (79%) patients were successfully managed conservatively for PNI and 109 (21%) surgically or by endovascular intervention. Only five (1.2%) patients failed a trial of SNOM and required surgery. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2%. No deaths could be attributed to a failure of SNOM.

CONCLUSION

SNOM of PNI is a safe and appropriate management strategy. The conservative management of isolated pharyngeal injuries is well supported by our findings but the role of conservative treatment of oesophageal injuries needs to be further defined. The SNOM of small non-destructive upper airway injuries seems to be a safe strategy, while destructive airway injuries require formal repair. Imaging merely for proximity, is associated with a low yield. CTA has a significant false positive rate and good clinical assessment remains the cornerstone of management.

Traumatic tracheostomy and spent bullet aspiration after a gunshot injury: a case report

Penetrating tracheal injuries are rare. Even rarer is the finding of intrabronchial foreign bodies caused by penetrating objects. We report a patient who experienced a gunshot injury to the trachea and mandible. The tracheal wound was debrided and used as a tracheostomy; a spent bullet in the bronchial tree was missed on initial evaluation but later successfully retrieved bronchoscopically. Spent bullet aspiration is a very rare occurrence. A careful examination of radiographs is essential to aid with the diagnosis. Flexible bronchoscopy is the best means of bullet retrieval. Management of any associated injuries is made easier after the airway is secured.

Management of penetrating neck injuries

BACKGROUND

Routine surgical exploration after penetrating neck injury (PNI) leads to a large number of negative neck explorations and potential iatrogenic injury. Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of PNI is gaining favour. The present study assessed the feasibility of SNOM in PNI.

METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with PNI presenting to a tertiary trauma centre were included in this prospective study from September 2009 to December 2009. All patients were managed according to Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines, and either underwent emergency surgery or were managed without surgery, based on clinical presentation and/or outcome of special investigations.

RESULTS

Eight patients (10 per cent) were haemodynamically unstable at presentation. Foley catheter balloon tamponade (FCBT) was successful in stopping active bleeding in six of these patients, and diagnostic angiography revealed an arterial injury in five. The remaining 69 patients were managed using SNOM. Angiography or computed tomography was done in 41 patients (53 per cent), and showed arterial injury in 15. These injuries were treated surgically (7 patients), radiologically (stenting in 3) or conservatively. Contrast swallow and/or endoscopy were performed in 37 patients (48 per cent) for suspected oesophageal injury, but yielded no positive results. During follow-up no missed injuries were detected.

CONCLUSION

FCBT was useful in patients with PNI and active bleeding. Stable patients should undergo additional investigation based on clinical findings only.

An evidence based review of the assessment and management of penetrating neck trauma

BACKGROUND

Although relatively uncommon, penetrating neck trauma has the potential for serious morbidity and an estimated mortality of up to 6%. The assessment and management of patients who have sustained a penetrating neck injury has historically been an issue surrounded by significant controversy. OBJECTIVES OF REVIEW: To assess recent evidence relating to the assessment and management of penetrating neck trauma, highlighting areas of controversy with an overall aim of formulating clinical guidelines according to a care pathway format.

TYPE OF REVIEW

Structured, non-systematic review of recent medical literature.

SEARCH STRATEGY

An electronic literature search was performed in May 2011. The Medline database was searched using the Medical Subject Headings terms 'neck injuries' and 'wounds, penetrating' in conjunction with the terms 'assessment' or 'management'. Embase was searched with the terms 'penetrating trauma' and 'neck injury', also in conjunction with the terms 'assessment' and 'management'. Results were limited to articles published in English from 1990 to the present day.

EVALUATION METHOD

Abstracts were reviewed by the first three authors to select full-text articles for further critical appraisal. The references and citation links of these articles were hand-searched to identify further articles of relevance.

RESULTS

147 relevant articles were identified by the electronic literature search, comprising case series, case reports and reviews. 33 were initially selected for further evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although controversy continues to surround the management of penetrating neck trauma, the role of selective non-operative management and the utility of CT angiography to investigate potential vascular injuries appears to be increasingly accepted.

Experienced Airway Management in Laryngotracheal Injuries: Series of Cases, Survey and Review of Literature

Definitive airway control of penetrating laryngotracheal injury can be an extremely difficult challenge for the emergency physician. We report three serious cases of penetrating neck trauma with laryngeal injury that were managed successfully using different techniques of airway control in the Emergency Department (ED) of Hamad General Hospital during the three years from January 2006 through December 2008. Individualized assessment, identification of type of injury and familiarity with airway control techniques and the available options assure timely, safe and proper airway control in such injuries. Choice of technique in penetrating laryngotracheal injury is multifactorial and depends upon case presentation, physician preference, skill, and clinical constraints. The incidence of neck injury during this period was lower than in other reports; being 0.07 % of total trauma cases, while the incidence of penetrating neck injuries represented 17.6% of total neck injuries with no deaths. Implications Statement: Familiarity and availability of variant airway management techniques and variant surgical interventions in penetrating laryngotracheal injuries, improve outcome and reduce mortality.

Management of cervical stab wounds in low volume trauma centres: systematic physical examination and low threshold for adjunctive studies, or surgical exploration

INTRODUCTION

In Nordic countries penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) are infrequent and management has traditionally been guided by surgeons' preferences. Some form of selective non-operative approach is currently practised in most urban trauma centres.

OBJECTIVE

To examine demographic features and treatment outcome of non-ballistic penetrating neck injuries in southern Finland and provide management guidelines for centres with low volume of penetrating neck trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 85 platysma penetrating neck injuries in two southern Finland hospitals (Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUCH and Tampere University Hospital, TaUH) was carried out using the ICD-10 based hospital databases to identify PNI-patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of admitted patients with penetrating neck injuries was 1.3/100000/year. Fifty-two (61%) injuries were caused by random acts of violence, 28 (38%) were self-inflicted and 5 (6%) were accidents. Of all 85 patients, 52 (61%) underwent operative exploration with a negative exploration rate of 65%. Hard signs for vascular or aerodigestive trauma were present in 23 (27%) patients and all of these were operated with a negative exploration rate of 30%. Two patients had no hard signs on physical examination but were operatively explored and significant injuries were found in both patients. The hospital mortality rate was 0% and the overall complication rate for operated patients was 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma centres managing PNIs infrequently should have an individually tailored management protocol for penetrating neck injury patients. If mandatory exploration is not practised, a systematic physical examination should be the mainstay of diagnostic work up but the threshold for adjunctive studies should be low. Although not evident by the current data, protocol-based management could be useful in decreasing treatment variation and enhancing residency training.

Selective conservatism in trauma management: a South African contribution

Trauma in South Africa has been termed the malignant epidemic. This heritage was the result of a violent colonial legacy which spawned the apartheid system of injustice and the struggle against it The Apartheid regime created overcrowding, unemployment, social stagnation, and the disruption of normal family life. These were the catalysts for the incredible amount of criminal and interpersonal conflict in South Africa over the last 50 years. African townships such as Soweto in Johannesburg and Umlazi in Durban were crime-ridden ghettoes where the apartheid police were more interested in fueling the "black on black" violence rather than trying to curb it. Baragwanath (Chris Hani-Baragwanath) and King Edward the VIII Hospital in Durban were the "trauma care epicenters" on the fringes of these huge urban conurbations. Both were designated black hospitals and both were underfunded and dilapidated. Even the architecture was similar, with prefabricated, poorly ventilated structures serving as wards and clinics in both institutions. Trauma volumes consisted of between 10 and 20 laparotomies on weekend nights at the height of political unrest. This led to vast individual experience in several areas of trauma typified by Demetriades' experience with 70 penetrating cardiac injuries. In this setting of limited resources and an overwhelming volume of trauma, selective conservatism as a surgical philosophy took root and has profoundly influenced the way the world manages trauma. We detail and illustrate the evolution of this approach and its continued application.

Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the utility of dynamic computed tomographic (CT) scanning as a diagnostic tool and adjunct to physical examination in the identification of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injuries.

METHODS

All patients older than 14 years of age who suffered penetrating zone II neck injuries were eligible for entry into the study protocol at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients that presented with signs of surgically significant injury on physical examination underwent immediate neck exploration. Patients that did not show signs of surgically significant injury were entered into the study protocol and underwent soft tissue dynamic CT scan (1/2-cm cuts, 250-mL oral contrast) of the neck after initial resuscitation. After CT scan, all patients entered into the study protocol underwent esophagography. After completion of radiologic assessment, all study protocol patients underwent surgical exploration of the neck. The patient's surgical team was blinded to results of the CT scan and esophagography before and during surgical exploration of the neck.

RESULTS

During a 42-month period from May 1997 to March 2001, 42 patients were entered into the study protocol. Thirty-six (86%) of the injuries were secondary to stab wounds and the rest were caused by gunshot wounds. Surgical exploration revealed four esophageal injuries, of which two (50%) were missed by CT scan. Esophagography missed the identical esophageal injuries, as did CT scan. Both of the missed esophageal injuries were secondary to stab wounds. Seven internal jugular vein injuries were diagnosed intraoperatively, of which four (57%) were diagnosed by CT scan. During the study period, all patients with carotid artery and tracheal injuries were diagnosed by physical examination and thus underwent immediate surgical exploration without study entry.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic CT scan contributes minimally to the sensitivity of physical examination in the diagnosis of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injury. Diagnosis of esophageal injuries with dynamic CT scan appears no better than esophagography. CT scan has greater sensitivity than physical examination for the diagnosis of jugular venous injuries; however, the majority of these injuries do not require identification or surgical intervention.

An analysis of 32 surgically managed penetrating carotid artery injuries

A review of the surgical management of penetrating carotid artery injuries in the Trauma Unit at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, is presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

a retrospective analysis of all surgically treated penetrating carotid artery injuries over a 3-year period was performed. The policy is to repair all injuries to the common and internal carotid arteries. Ligation is reserved for patients with prolonged coma; ischaemic infarcts or cerebral oedema on computerised axial tomography of the brain; technically inaccessible high internal carotid artery injuries, and those with occluded arteries with no distal patency detected during surgery or with angiography.

RESULTS

thirty-two patients with penetrating carotid artery injuries were reviewed. Eleven patients underwent emergency exploration. Twenty-one patients had angiography prior to exploration. Injuries in the emergency group were all repaired, with improvement in level of consciousness; also, two patients had preoperative neurological deficits that improved. Three of the 21 patients in the urgent group underwent ligation of the common carotid artery: one comatose patient with a hemiparesis died following ligation; the other two had improvement in their level of consciousness, one of whom showed improvement of his hemiparesis. The remaining injuries to the common and internal carotid arteries were repaired with improvement in level of consciousness and neurological deficit when present.

CONCLUSION

operative repair offers the best chance of recovery.

Aerodigestive Injuries of the Neck

Cervical aerodigestive trauma is rare and most centers have a limited experience with its management. The purpose of this review was to study the epidemiology, diagnosis, and problems related to the early evaluation and management of these injuries. This was a retrospective study based on trauma registry and on chart, operative, radiological, and endoscopic reports. There were 1560 admissions with blunt or penetrating trauma to the neck. The overall incidence of aerodigestive trauma was 4.9 per cent (10.2% for gunshot wounds, 4.6% for stab wounds, and 1.2% for blunt trauma). All patients with aerodigestive trauma had suspicious signs or symptoms on admission. The most common life-threatening problem in the emergency room and directly related to the aerodigestive trauma was airway compromise. Twenty-nine per cent of patients with laryngotracheal trauma required an emergency room airway establishment because of threatened airway loss. Although rapid sequence induction was successful in the majority of cases, in 11.9 per cent there was loss of airway and a cricothyroidotomy was necessary. Overall, 9 per cent of cases with aerodigestive injuries were successfully treated nonoperatively. Thirty-six per cent of patients with laryngotracheal trauma and surgical repair were successfully treated without a protective tracheostomy. There was no mortality due to the aerodigestive injuries. Cervical aerodigestive trauma is rare. In conclusion, all patients with significant aerodigestive injuries requiring treatment had suspicious signs and symptoms. Airway compromise was a common problem in the emergency room. Loss of airway after rapid sequence induction is a potentially lethal complication and the trauma team should be ready for a surgical airway. Repair of laryngotracheal injuries without a protective tracheostomy is safe in selected cases.

Gunshot injuries of the lower oesophagus

We present seven cases of lower oesophageal gunshot injury cared for by one surgeon. Diagnosis was made clinically, with the help of chest X-rays and with oesophagography and oesophagoscopy. Five were treated with wide debridement and resection of the distal esophagus and oesophago-gastric anastomosis with a Nissen wrap to protect the anastomosis. Two lesser injuries were treated by primary repair. The five treated with resection and oesophago-gastric anastomosis did not leak and the patients were discharged after oesophagography 10 days postoperatively. Primary repairs in two patients were complicated by oesophageal leaks, one subclinical and one with an empyema. The oesophageal blood supply is segmental in areas and variable in the distal part. Injury due to a bullet wound may cause more damage than is evident at surgery. Additional mobilization can further devascularize the distal oesophagus and lead to anastomotic leaks. We advocate wide debridement of oesophageal gunshot injuries and resection of the distal oesophagus. Continuity is restored with a primary oesophago-gastric anastomosis (double layer) with a fundoplication to protect the anastomosis.

Penetrating neck trauma

Penetrating neck trauma can pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for emergency physicians. Factors contributing to these problems are complex anatomy, proximity of vital structures, and potential for rapid deterioration of airway, vascular, or neurologic injuries. Other contributing factors are the lack of consensus in the literature regarding appropriate evaluation and management of penetrating neck injuries, and insufficient resources or experienced personnel at some institutions. This review focuses on the key components of the history and physical examinations that allow for an assessment of the severity and type of structures involved. In addition, current methods of airway management, as well as ways to manage penetrating neck trauma efficiently and cost effectively, are discussed.

Complex problems in penetrating neck trauma

This article discusses the problems and controversies in the assessment of penetrating injuries of the neck. The role of physical examination and color-flow Doppler imaging in the initial assessment is highlighted. Complex injuries of major vessels, the aerodigestive tract, and the parotid are discussed and therapeutic options are presented.

Conservative management of penetrating hypopharyngeal wounds

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the applicability of nonoperative treatment to penetrating hypopharyngeal wounds.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of patients with penetrating hypopharyngeal wounds who were treated nonoperatively at the Hospital Universitario del Valle (Cali, Colombia) during 4 years (beginning January 1990) was performed. Patients older than 13 years with proven lesions produced by penetrating trauma were included. Patients with foreign-body-induced or iatrogenic lesions (orotracheal intubation, endoscopy) or immediate need for surgery (for associated lesions) were excluded. Nonoperative management consisted of nasogastric tube for feeding, suspension of oral intake, and parenteral antibiotics for 7 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen patients met the above criteria. Gunshot wounds (n = 11) were the most common trauma. An esophagogram/endoscopy demonstrated the lesions. The only complication in the group consisted of a cervical abscess, which presented in a patient during the first week of treatment. There were no complications such as fistula, leakage, and Horner's syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management is a good and safe alternative when indicated in penetrating hypopharyngeal wounds.

Transcervical gunshot injuries

Gunshot injuries across the cervical midline are not addressed in existing trauma algorithms. A retrospective study of 41 patients with transcervical gunshot wounds was undertaken to delineate injury patterns and management principles. Thirty-four of the 41 patients (83%) sustained 52 injuries to major cervical structures. Vascular (22 injuries) and upper airway (13 injuries) structures were most commonly involved. This resulted in presentation with life-threatening problems in 16 patients (39%). The in-hospital mortality was 10%. In 30 of the 36 neck explorations (83%), the findings were positive for injuries to cervical structures. Sixteen bilateral explorations were performed; in each case, cervical injury was observed on at least one side of the neck. These results indicate that transcervical injuries are excellent markers of associated visceral injury. Therefore, a policy of mandatory neck exploration and a particularly "low threshold" for bilateral exploration are the key to managing these injuries.

Physical examination and selective conservative management in patients with penetrating injuries of the neck

This prospective study of 335 patients with penetrating injuries of the neck examined the decision whether to operate or observe according to a protocol based mainly on physical examination. Emergency angiography was performed in only three patients. Sixty-six patients (20 per cent) were subjected to emergency operation because of signs and symptoms suggestive of significant injury (60 patients) or because of positive investigations (six). The remaining 269 patients (80 per cent) were selected for non-operative management. Two of these patients (0.7 per cent) required elective operation during the initial hospital stay. No deaths occurred in patients treated conservatively. Some 192 (72 per cent) of observed patients were available for early follow-up and 111 (42 per cent) for late follow-up. No significant complications were found. Physical examination is a reliable method for detecting significant injuries following penetrating neck trauma. Emergency angiography is rarely necessary.

[Perforation of the esophagus during attempted endotracheal intubation]

A case is reported of oesophageal perforation which occurred during an attempt to carry out endotracheal intubation. A 54-year-old female patient was scheduled for mastectomy. She had no clinical features likely to predict a difficult endotracheal intubation. After induction with thiopentone, phenoperidine and suxamethonium, three attempts were made to carry out tracheal intubation with a Mallinckrodt Lo-pro tube, internal diameter 7.5 mm. During the third attempt, the oesophagus was accidentally intubated. The diagnosis was made before any insufflation was carried out. Another anaesthetist took over, and intubated the patient. At that time, there was left-sided cervical emphysema which quickly spread. An oesophageal perforation was suspected, and the patient was given 500 mg of metronidazole and 1 g of cefotetan. Postoperatively, the antibiotics were continued, and the patient had nothing by mouth. Oesophagography showed a posterior fistula in the upper third. Conservative treatment was continued until the seventh day, when another oesophagography was carried out. This showed that the perforation had completely healed. This rather rare complication of endotracheal intubation may have a poor prognosis if it results in mediastinitis. The diagnosis and prognosis of this complication and its treatment, whether conservative or surgical, are discussed.