National audit of complicated diverticular disease: analysis of index cases

A rare case of sigmoid diverticulitis presenting as colocutaneous left lumbar fistula

Colonic diverticula are very common as asymptomatic findings on endoscopic examination. Diverticulitis as a complication occurs in ~4% of these patients with well-known further complications. Colocutaneous fistulas are very rare and are usually caused by percutaneous drainage procedures of abscess formations or as a complication of the natural disease. We present here a case report of a 70-year-old man who initially presented with signs of sepsis and later developed a colocutaneous fistula in the lumbar region.

HARTMANN PROCEDURE OR RESECTION WITH PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS FOR TREATMENT OF PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS? SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Mortality after emergency surgery in randomized controlled trials. The Hartmann procedure remains the treatment of choice for most surgeons for the urgent surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis; however, it is associated with high rates of ostomy non-reversion and postoperative morbidity.

AIM

To study the results after the Hartmann vs. resection with primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV), and to compare the advantages between the two forms of treatment.

METHOD

Systematic search in the literature of observational and randomized articles comparing resection with primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure in the emergency treatment of perforated diverticulitis. Analyze as primary outcomes the mortality after the emergency operation and the general morbidity after it. As secondary outcomes, severe morbidity after emergency surgery, rates of non-reversion of the ostomy, general and severe morbidity after reversion.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between surgical procedures for mortality, general morbidity and severe morbidity. However, the differences were statistically significant, favoring primary anastomosis in comparison with the Hartmann procedure in the outcome rates of stoma non-reversion, general morbidity and severe morbidity after reversion.

CONCLUSION

Primary anastomosis is a good alternative to the Hartmann procedure, with no increase in mortality and morbidity, and with better results in the operation for intestinal transit reconstruction.

Primary resection anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure in Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis

Introduction

Surgical management of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis utilizes either Hartmann’s procedure (HP) or primary resection anastomosis (PRA) with or without fecal diversion. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine which of the two procedures has a more favorable outcome.

Methods

A systematic review of the existing literature was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was carried out using a Mantel-Haenszel, random effects model, and forest plots were generated. The Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scoring tools were used to assess the included studies.

Results

A total of 25 studies involving 3546 patients were included in this study. The overall mortality in the HP group was 10.8% across the observational studies and 9.4% in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The mortality rate in the PRA group was lower than that in the HP group, at 8.2% in the observational studies and 4.3% in the RCTs. A comparison of PRA vs HP demonstrated a 40% lower mortality rate in the PRA group than in the HP (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.95, p = 0.03) when analyzing the observational studies. However, meta-analysis of the three RCTs did not demonstrate any difference in mortality, (OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.14–1.34, p = 0.15). Wound infection rates between the two groups were comparable (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.20–2.78, p = 0.67).

Conclusion

Analysis of observational studies suggests that PRA may be associated with a lower overall mortality. There were no differences in wound infection rates. Based on the current evidence, both surgical strategies appear to be acceptable.

The Association between Absence of Abdominal Pain and Mortality in Lower Intestinal Perforation in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Objective

To determine mortality and predictive factors for lower intestinal perforation (LIP) among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, observational study analyzed mortality rates in 31 autoimmune rheumatic disease patients with LIP who were admitted to our hospital from January 2002 to June 2017. The primary outcome was the mortality rate during hospitalization.

Results

The median age at the time of LIP was 61 years, and the survival rate at discharge was 64.5%. Eleven patients died of sepsis during hospitalization. Cox univariable analysis for mortality during hospitalization showed that absence of abdominal pain (hazard ratio (HR) 5.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–22.9), higher age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11), chronic kidney disease (HR 6.89, 95% CI 1.85–25.7), systemic vasculitis (HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.14–13.6), higher blood urea nitrogen (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), higher serum creatinine (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.87), and LIP due to malignancy (HR 14.3, 95% CI 1.95–105.1) significantly increased mortality.

Conclusion

Abdominal pain was absent in 16% of LIP patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and this absence was a poor prognostic factor in this cohort. Moreover, higher age, chronic kidney disease, systemic vasculitis, and LIP due to malignancy were associated with significantly increased mortality. Physicians should be aware of LIP in autoimmune disease patients with higher age, chronic kidney diseases, or systemic vasculitis even if patients reveal mild abdominal symptoms.

A historical review of surgery for peritonitis secondary to acute colonic diverticulitis: from Lockhart-Mummery to evidence-based medicine

The management of patients with colonic diverticular perforation is still evolving. Initial lavage with or without simple suture and drainage was suggested in the late 19th century, replaced progressively by the three-stage Mayo Clinic or the two-stage Mickulicz procedures. Fears of inadequate source control prompted the implementation of the resection of the affected segment of colon with formation of a colostomy (Hartman procedure) in the 1970’s. Ensuing development of the treatment strategies was driven by the recognition of the high morbidity and mortality and low reversal rates associated with the Hartman procedure. This led to the wider use of resection and primary anastomosis during the 1990’s.

The technique of lavage and drainage regained popularity during the 1990’s. This procedure can also be performed laparoscopically with the advantage of faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. This strategy allows resectional surgery to be postponed or avoided altogether in many patients; and higher rates of primary resection and anastomosis can be achieved avoiding the need for a stoma. The three recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic peritoneal lavage alone to resectional surgery reported inconsistent outcomes.

The aim of this review is to review the historical evolution and future reflections of surgical treatment modalities for diffuse purulent and feculent peritonitis. In this review we classified the various surgical strategies according to Krukowski et al. and Vermeulen et al. and reviewed the literature related to surgical treatment separately for each period.

Treatment of patients with acute colonic diverticulitis complicated by abscess formation: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to systematically review the literature and present the evidence on outcomes after treatment for acute diverticulitis with abscess formation. Secondly, the paper aimed to compare different treatment options.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Two authors screened the records independently, initially on title and abstract and subsequently on full-text basis. Articles describing patients treated acutely for Hinchey Ib and II were included. Results were presented by treatment, classified as non-operative (percutaneous abscess drainage (PAD), antibiotics, or unspecified non-operative strategy), PAD, antibiotics, or acute surgery. The outcomes of interest were treatment failure, short-term mortality, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 1723 articles, 42 studies were included, describing 8766 patients with Hinchey Ib-II diverticulitis. Observational studies were the only available evidence. Treatment generally failed for 20% of patients, regardless of non-operative treatment choice. Abscesses with diameters less than 3 cm were sufficiently treated with antibiotics alone, possibly as outpatient treatment. Of patients treated non-operatively, 25% experienced a recurrent episode during long-term follow-up. When comparing PAD to antibiotic treatment, it appeared that PAD lead to recurrence less often (15.9% vs. 22.2%). Patients undergoing acute surgery had increased risk of death (12.1% vs. 1.1%) compared to patients treated non-operatively. Of patients undergoing PAD, 2.5% experienced procedure-related complications and 15.5% needed adjustment or replacement of the drain.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational studies with unmatched patients were the best available evidence which limited comparability and resulted in risk of selection bias and confounding by indication. Diverticular abscesses with diameters less than 3 cm might be sufficiently treated with antibiotics, while the best treatment for larger abscesses remains uncertain. Acute surgery should be reserved for critically ill patients failing non-operative treatment. Further research is needed to determine the best treatment for different sizes and types of diverticular abscesses, preferably randomized controlled trials.

Characteristics of Colonic Diverticulitis and Factors Associated With Complications: A Japanese Multicenter, Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of diverticulitis in Japan. Additional information is needed about its clinical characteristics and the factors associated with complications of diverticulitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the clinical characteristics of diverticulitis and factors associated with its complications in Japanese patients.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, multicenter, large-scale, cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

All of the consecutive patients in 21 Japanese hospitals with a final diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis were included in this study.

PATIENTS

A total of 1112 patients, including 658 men and 454 women, with a mean age of 54.8 years, who were diagnosed by CT and/or ultrasonography between January 2006 and May 2011, were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Data on medical history, investigations, treatments, and prognosis were collected using a standard form to create a dedicated database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clarification of the clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with acute diverticulitis was the main outcome measured.

RESULTS

Diverticulitis was detected mainly in men and women aged 40 to 60 years. Although diverticulitis more frequently affected the right colon (70.1%), diverticulitis of the left colon was significantly more frequent (61.0%) in elderly patients. Of the 1112 patients with diverticulitis, 179 (16.1%) developed complications, including abscess formation, perforation, stenosis, and/or fistula, some of which required surgical treatment, such as drainage or colonic resection. The duration of hospitalization (24.1 ± 19.5 days) and mortality rate (2.8%) were significantly higher in patients with versus without complications. Factors associated with complications were fever (>38.5°C), involvement of the left colon, higher age, and delayed diagnosis.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included the nonconsideration of diverticulitis treatment, the effect of dietary fiber, and the retrospective design of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications were more frequent in elderly men with left-sided diverticulitis, although diverticulitis was more common in middle-aged people and on the right side of the colon. Factors associated with complications were fever, site of involvement, older age, and longer time until diagnosis.

Antibiotics alone instead of percutaneous drainage as initial treatment of large diverticular abscess

BACKGROUND

There are limited data assessing the effectiveness of antibiotics as sole initial therapy in patients with large diverticular abscess. The aim of our study was to compare outcomes of selected patients treated with initial antibiotics alone versus percutaneous drainage.

METHODS

All patients with diverticular abscess ≥3 cm in diameter treated in our institution in 1994-2012 with percutaneous drainage or antibiotics alone followed by surgery were identified from an institutional diverticular disease database. Groups were compared based on patient and disease characteristics, treatment failures and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were treated with antibiotics alone because of either technically impossible percutaneous drainage (n = 15) or surgeon preference (n = 17) while 114 underwent percutaneous drainage. Failure of initial treatment required urgent surgery in 8 patients with persistent symptoms during treatment with antibiotics alone (25 %) and in 21 patients (18 %) after initial percutaneous drainage (p = 0.21). Reasons for urgent surgery after percutaneous drainage were persistent symptoms (n = 16), technical failure of percutaneous drainage (n = 4) and small bowel injury (n = 1). Patients treated with antibiotics had a significantly smaller abscess diameter (5.9 vs. 7.1 cm, p = 0.001) and shorter interval from initial treatment to sigmoidectomy (mean 50 vs. 80 days, p = 0.02). The Charlson comorbidity index, initial treatment failure rates, postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, length of hospital stay during treatments, and overall and permanent stoma rates were comparable in the two groups. Postoperative complications following antibiotics alone were significantly less severe than after percutaneous drainage based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients with diverticular abscess can be initially treated with antibiotics without adverse consequences on their outcomes.

A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome after Hartmann's procedure (HP) versus primary anastomosis (PA) with diverting ileostomy for perforated left-sided diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of left-sided colonic perforation with purulent or fecal peritonitis remains controversial. PA with ileostomy seems to be superior to HP; however, results in the literature are affected by a significant selection bias. No randomized clinical trial has yet compared the 2 procedures.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with acute left-sided colonic perforation (Hinchey III and IV) from 4 centers were randomized to HP (n = 30) and to PA (with diverting ileostomy, n = 32), with a planned stoma reversal operation after 3 months in both groups. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary end point was the overall complication rate. The study was discontinued following an interim analysis that found significant differences of relevant secondary end points as well as a decreasing accrual rate (NCT01233713).

RESULTS

Patient demographics were equally distributed in both groups (Hinchey III: 76% vs 75% and Hinchey IV: 24% vs 25%, for HP vs PA, respectively). The overall complication rate for both resection and stoma reversal operations was comparable (80% vs 84%, P = 0.813). Although the outcome after the initial colon resection did not show any significant differences (mortality 13% vs 9% and morbidity 67% vs 75% in HP vs PA), the stoma reversal rate after PA with diverting ileostomy was higher (90% vs 57%, P = 0.005) and serious complications (Grades IIIb-IV: 0% vs 20%, P = 0.046), operating time (73 minutes vs 183 minutes, P < 0.001), hospital stay (6 days vs 9 days, P = 0.016), and lower in-hospital costs (US $16,717 vs US $24,014) were significantly reduced in the PA group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized clinical trial favoring PA with diverting ileostomy over HP in patients with perforated diverticulitis.

The surgeon's view

Diverticular disease affects up to 50% of people by the time they reach the age of 80. The major complications of diverticular disease (abscess, perforation, fistula, obstruction and bleeding) have their own management pathways, but the treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is controversial. On initial presentation, diverticulitis is always treated conservatively. Whether this should be followed by resectional surgery has been the subject of speculation for many decades. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommended in 2000 that an elective resection should follow two attacks of acute diverticulitis. Much of the work underpinning their policy was based on seminal studies by Parks in the 1960s and 1970s who followed cohorts of patients with diverticular disease and examined their outcomes. However, many of these studies were based on inaccurate diagnostic data where the diagnosis was made primarily on clinical grounds. Investigations such as barium enema or colonoscopy are not reliable in confirming the presence of inflammation. Since CT scanning has become routine, the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis can now be made accurately. In recent years much work has been done, such as by Ambrosetti, who has produced evidence predicting the outcome of diverticulitis based on CT findings. More recent papers, in which the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is likely to have been made more accurately, confirm that although recurrent attacks of diverticulitis are fairly common, there is a very low incidence of serious complications after long-term follow-up. It has also become apparent that the majority of patients who present with the major complications of diverticulitis, specifically abscess, perforation and fistula, do so as their first presentation of the disease, without previous episodes of diverticulitis. The corollary of this is that patients having had acute diverticulitis do not run the risk of developing life-threatening complications without elective surgery. The complications of left-sided colonic resection are not inconsiderable with anastomotic leaks, the formation of a stoma, either temporary or permanent, as well as mortality. When these data are put alongside the very low risk of serious harm to the patient after diverticulitis, the balance of opinion has now swung heavily in favour of a more conservative approach. In addition to this there are modern and innovative medical therapeutic approaches to the treatment of diverticulitis such as 5ASAs, poorly absorbed antibiotics and probiotics.

Changing epidemiology: does it increase our understanding?

During the last decade there have been a number of reports using routinely collected health care administration data and from large cohort studies that have attempted to describe changes in the occurrence and identify risk factors for the development of the condition along with reporting its associated mortality. This article identified all studies reporting the occurrence and mortality associated with diverticulosis, diverticular disease and the complications of diverticular disease, notably, bleeding, perforation, fistula, stricture and abscess formation which show that there is strong evidence of an increasing health care burden associated with diverticular disease in terms of hospitalization. There is evidence of an increase in the incidence of some of the associated complications of diverticular disease, notably perforation. A number of risk factors such as body mass index, comorbidity, smoking and concurrent medications such as opiate analgesics and steroids may predispose to the development of complications. The mortality associated with hospital admission for diverticular disease is significant as is the excess mortality associated with a diagnosis of one of the complications of diverticular disease.

Impact of early or delayed elective resection in complicated diverticulitis

AIM: To investigate the outcomes of early and delayed elective resection after initial antibiotic treatment in patients with complicated diverticulitis.

METHODS: The study, a non-randomized comparison of the two approaches, included 421 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis (Hinchey classification I-II) at the Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2004 and 2009. The operating procedure, duration of hospital and intensive care unit stay, outcome, complications and socioeconomic costs were analyzed, with comparison made between the early and delayed elective resection strategies.

RESULTS: The severity of the diverticulitis and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were comparable for the two groups. Patients who underwent delayed elective resection had a shorter hospital stay and operating time, and the rate of successfully completed laparoscopic resections was higher (80% vs 75%). Eight patients who were scheduled for delayed elective resection required urgent surgery because of complications of the diverticulitis, which resulted in a high rate of morbidity. Analysis of the socioeconomic effects showed that hospitalization costs were significantly higher for delayed elective resection compared with early elective resection (9296 €± 694 € vs 8423 €± 968 €; P = 0.001). Delayed elective resection showed a trend toward lower complications, and the operation appeared simpler to perform than early elective resection. Nevertheless, delayed elective resection carries a risk of complications occurring during the period of 6-8 wk that could necessitate an urgent resection with its consequent high morbidity, which counterbalanced many of the advantages.

CONCLUSION: Overall, early elective resection for complicated, non-perforated diverticulitis is shown to be a suitable alternative to delayed elective resection after 6-8 wk, with additional beneficial socioeconomic effects.

Ileorectal fistula due to a rectal cancer-A case report

A 51-year-old man was seen at our hospital because of diarrhea. Barium enema and colonoscopy revealed a cancer in the lower rectum and fistula formation from the site to ileum. Resection of the rectal cancer and ileorectal fistula was performed. Histologically, the resected lesion was mucinous adenocarcinoma with contiguous invasion from the rectum to the ileum. The patient is alive with no sign of recurrence 120 months after operation. Fistula formation between the colon and other gastrointestinal tract organs is very rare, especially for rectal cancer. Fistula-forming colorectal cancers are rarely found to have metastatic lesions in the liver, peritoneum and lymph nodes despite their invasive behavior; accordingly, curative resection involving partial resection of the intestine with fistula is expected.

Long-term health-related quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this multicentric study was to evaluate the disease specific and the generic quality of life in patients affected by colonic diverticular disease (DD) who had undergone minimally invasive or open colonic resection or who had been treated with medical therapy in the long-term follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive patients admitted to the departments of surgery of Padova and Arzignano Hospitals for DD were interviewed: 22 underwent minimally invasive colonic resection, 24 had open resection, and 25 had only medical therapy. The interview focused on disease specific and generic quality of life, body image, and disease activity.

RESULTS

Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life (PIBDQL) was validated for the use in DD patients. PIBDQL scores were significantly worse in all patients with DD than those obtained by healthy subjects and it correlated with the symptoms score. The generic quality of life seemed similar in patients who had minimally invasive colonic resection compared with healthy subjects. Body Image Questionnaire scores correlated inversely with the presence of a stoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease activity resulted as the only independent predictor of the disease-specific quality of life. In fact, DD affected bowel function and quality of life of patients in the long-term follow-up regardless of the type of therapy adopted. The presence of a stoma affected the patients' body image.

Health related quality of life after surgery for colonic diverticular disease

Diverticular disease (DD) of the colon is very common in developed countries and is ranked the fifth most important gastrointestinal disease worldwide. The management of acute diverticulitis without perforation and peritonitis is still debated. Health related quality of life (HRQL), subjectively perceived by patients, is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, mainly in patients with chronic disease. To date only a few published studies can be found on Medline examining HRQL in patients with DD. The aim of this study was to review the impact of surgery for DD on HRQL. All Medline articles regarding HRQL after surgery for colonic DD, particularly those comparing different surgical approaches, were reviewed. DD has a negative impact on HRQL with lower scores in bowel function and systemic symptoms. Both surgery-related complications and disease activity have a significant impact on patients' HRQL. While no significant differences in HRQL between different operations for DD in non-randomized studies were revealed, the only prospective double-blind randomized study that compared laparoscopic and open colectomy found that patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy had significantly reduced major postoperative complication rates and subsequently had better HRQL scores. Formal assessment of HRQL could be a good instrument in the selection of appropriate patients for elective surgery as well as in the assessment of surgical outcome.

Subcutaneous emphysema, muscular necrosis, and necrotizing fasciitis: an unusual presentation of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis

With advancing age and the affluent, low-fiber Western diet, the incidence of diverticular disease is increasing. Fortunately, most cases can be managed conservatively without resorting to surgical intervention. Life-threatening complications such as perforation, especially when it is associated with gross fecal contamination, requires urgent aggressive surgical intervention. A 75-year-old man with absolute constipation and pain in the left iliac fossa underwent urgent laparotomy following fluid and antibiotic resuscitation. A posterior perforated sigmoid diverticulitis associated with myofascial necrosis and generalized pelvic emphysema was identified. In cases where perforation occurs posteriorly and the only external manifestation is surgical emphysema, the outcome is generally favorable.

Left sided diverticulitis presenting as a right lumbar fistula: a case report

The formation of fistulae is a recognised complication of diverticulitis. This case report describes sigmoid diverticulitis presenting as a right psoas abscess with a colocutaneous fistula. The report highlights the role of appropriate imaging and a high index of suspicion in anyone presenting with a discharging lumbar abscess, especially when the focus of infection may be from a contra-lateral source.

A population-based study of perforated diverticular disease incidence and associated mortality

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Perforated diverticular disease represents the most serious complication of diverticular disease, but little is known regarding its occurrence and mortality. We aimed to determine the incidence and mortality associated with diverticular perforation and the influence of comorbidity.

METHODS

We used a population-based cohort study using patients with perforated diverticular disease and population controls identified from 1990 to 2005 in the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Incidence and mortality rates were modelled using Poisson and Cox regression. Comorbidity was quantified using the Charlson index.

RESULTS

We identified 953 incident patients. The overall incidence was 2.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49-2.83) per 100,000 person-years. The incidence rates increased 2.28-fold (95% CI: 1.79-2.95) when corrected for age and sex between 1990 and 2005. The risk of death was highest in the first year with a 6-fold increase (hazard ratio [HR], 5.63; 95% CI: 4.68-6.77). Adjusted for age and sex, the risk of death in the first year was highest in those with lowest comorbidity (HR, 11.11; 95% CI: 8.06-15.31), but the absolute mortality rates were greatest in those with the highest comorbidity (263.1 per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of perforated diverticular disease has doubled over the period of the study. Patients presenting with a perforated diverticulum are 6 times more likely to die than the general population during the first year following perforation. Those who have the greatest comorbidity are the most likely to die; however, those with least comorbidity have an 11-fold increase in mortality in the first year.

Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 500 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine morbidity, mortality, conversion rates, and disease recurrence after laparoscopic resection of complicated and uncomplicated diverticular disease in a single center.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In contrast to colorectal cancer, there are few large studies of laparoscopic or open resection for diverticular disease.

METHODS

This study represents a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all laparoscopic resections for uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis from a single center.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients (305 female) were identified (median age 58; range, 26-89). Recurrent diverticulitis was the most common indication for surgery (77%), followed by perforation (10%) and fistulation (9%). Median operating time was 120 minutes (range, 45-285) and median length of hospital stay was 4 (2-33) days. The splenic flexure was routinely mobilized. There was 1 (0.2%) 30-day and in-hospital death and 55 (11%) patients had major morbidity after the procedure. Conversion to an open operation was performed in 14 (2.8%) cases. Dense adhesions were the most common cause for conversion (6 patients). Among patients with complicated diverticulitis, the conversion rate was 5.3%, whereas for those with uncomplicated disease, it was 2.1% (P = ns). Operating time and length of hospital stay do not differ significantly between patients with complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. The conversion rate has come down from 8% for the first 100 cases to 1.5% for the last 400 cases (P = 0.002). To our knowledge, there have been no cases of recurrent diverticulitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection even in complicated cases of diverticulitis is safe and effective. It can be achieved with short operating times and length of stay in conjunction with very low rates of morbidity and mortality. Adherence to surgical principles including routine mobilization of the splenic flexure and anastomosis onto the rectum may explain the absence of disease recurrence in our experience.

Health-related quality of life after colonic resection for diverticular disease: long-term results

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While colonic resection is standard practice in complicated colonic diverticular disease (DD), treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is, as yet, unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome and quality of life in DD patients undergoing colonic resection compared to those receiving medical treatment only.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive patients who were admitted to our surgical department with left iliac pain and endoscopical or radiological diagnosis of DD were enrolled in this trial. Disease severity was assessed with Hinchey scale. Twenty-five of the patients underwent colonic resection, while 46 were treated with medical therapy alone. After a median follow-up of 47 (3-102) months from the time of their first hospital admission, the patients responded to the questions of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) questionnaire and to a symptoms questionnaire during a telephone interview. Admittance and surgical procedures for DD were also investigated, and surgery- and symptoms-free survival rates were calculated. Nonparametric tests and survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

The CGQL total scores and symptom frequency rate were found to be similar in the two groups (resection vs nonresection). Only current quality of health item was significantly worse in patients who had undergone colonic resection (p = 0.05). No difference was found in the rate and in the timing of surgical procedures and hospital admitting for DD in the two groups. In particular, the nine patients classified as Hinchey 1 who underwent surgery reported the same quality of life, symptoms frequency, operation, and hospital admitting rate as those who had been admitted with the same disease class but who received medical treatment only.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that there does not seem to be any long-term advantage to colonic resection which should be considered only in patients presenting complicated DD.

Health-related quality of life after colonic resection for diverticular disease: long-term results

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While colonic resection is standard practice in complicated colonic diverticular disease (DD), treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is, as yet, unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome and quality of life in DD patients undergoing colonic resection compared to those receiving medical treatment only.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive patients who were admitted to our surgical department with left iliac pain and endoscopical or radiological diagnosis of DD were enrolled in this trial. Disease severity was assessed with Hinchey scale. Twenty-five of the patients underwent colonic resection, while 46 were treated with medical therapy alone. After a median follow-up of 47 (3-102) months from the time of their first hospital admission, the patients responded to the questions of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) questionnaire and to a symptoms questionnaire during a telephone interview. Admittance and surgical procedures for DD were also investigated, and surgery- and symptoms-free survival rates were calculated. Nonparametric tests and survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

The CGQL total scores and symptom frequency rate were found to be similar in the two groups (resection vs nonresection). Only current quality of health item was significantly worse in patients who had undergone colonic resection (p = 0.05). No difference was found in the rate and in the timing of surgical procedures and hospital admitting for DD in the two groups. In particular, the nine patients classified as Hinchey 1 who underwent surgery reported the same quality of life, symptoms frequency, operation, and hospital admitting rate as those who had been admitted with the same disease class but who received medical treatment only.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that there does not seem to be any long-term advantage to colonic resection which should be considered only in patients presenting complicated DD.

Perforated colonic diverticular disease: the importance of NSAIDs, opioids, corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers

PURPOSE

Perforated colonic diverticular disease is associated with a high rate of late sequel and mortality. The risk of colonic perforation may relate to intracolonic pressure and mucosal barrier function in the wall of diverticula. The use of substances affecting these parameters may therefore be associated with the risk of developing a perforation. The aim was to study the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, corticosteroids, calcium channel blockers, and antimuscarinics on perforation in diverticular disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of 54 patients with colonic diverticular perforation-forming the case group-and 183 patients with verified colonic diverticular disease-forming the control group-was done. Patient characteristics and drug use was registered.

RESULTS

Case group and control group were comparable with respect to sex, age, and comorbidity. In multivariate analysis, the use of NSAIDs (OR 3.56; 95% CI 1.50-8.43), opioids (OR 4.51; 95% CI 1.67-12.18), and corticosteroids (OR 28.28; 95% CI 4.83-165.7) were significantly associated with perforated diverticular disease. Acetylsalicylic acid in cardiologic dose did not affect the rate of perforation (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.27-1.61). The use of calcium channel blockers was associated with a reduced rate of diverticular complications (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of NSAIDs, opioids, and corticosteroids are associated with an increased risk of colonic diverticular perforation. Acetylsalicylic acid in cardiologic dose does not affect the risk of perforation. Calcium channel blockers are associated with a reduced risk of perforation.

Incidence of perforated diverticulitis and risk factors for death in a UK population

Background

Perforated diverticulitis (PD) remains a serious acute abdominal condition. The aims of this study were to measure its incidence in a large UK population and to identify factors affecting outcomes.

Methods

Computerized searches of hospital coding databases for PD were performed in five hospitals in East Anglia, UK. Data were collected from hospital records over 5 years (1995–2000). Incidence was calculated using population data, and factors associated with mortality and morbidity were identified using univariable and multivariable testing.

Results

Some 202 patients with PD were identified, of whom 93·1 per cent underwent surgery and 24·3 per cent died. The age-adjusted adult incidence of perforation was 3·5 per 100 000 per annum, with a standardized female to male ratio of 1·3 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·1 to 1·5) to 1. Risk factors for death were increased age (odds ratio (OR) 3·5 (95 per cent c.i. 1·9 to 6·1)), pre-existing renal disease (OR 18·7 (1·6 to 211·4)) and pre-existing use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR 3·1 (1·3 to 7·3)).

Conclusion

PD is uncommon, with the highest incidence in women over 65 years old. Mortality rates are high, particularly in those taking NSAIDs or with pre-existing renal impairment.

Role of endoscopy in the management of acute diverticular bleeding

Colonic diverticulosis is one of the most common causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy is not only a useful diagnostic tool for localizing the bleeding site, but also a therapeutic modality for its management. To date, haemostatic methods have included adrenaline injection, mechanical clipping, thermal and electrical coagulation or combinations of them. The results of all published data are herein reviewed.

Outcomes after medical and surgical treatment of diverticulitis: a systematic review of the available evidence

There is still controversy regarding the appropriate management of diverticulitis of the colon in cases when both surgical and conservative treatment may be an option. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence regarding the outcomes after medical and surgical treatment of diverticulitis from studies published after 1980 and indexed in the PubMed database. We included original studies that reported comparative data for at least one outcome in medically- and surgically-treated patients with transverse or left colon diverticulitis. The main outcomes of interest were mortality, morbidity, and recurrence of diverticulitis after medical or surgical treatment. There were 21 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria out of 1360 initially identified as possibly relevant. More patients were treated conservatively in the included studies compared to emergency surgery (24 862 vs 6504). Emergency surgery was the main option for patients with severe complications of diverticular disease, including peritonitis. In most studies, in-hospital mortality for patients treated surgically was generally higher than that of patients treated medically, whereas there were insufficient comparative data regarding mortality during follow up. However, readmission to the hospital due to diverticular disease during follow up was more common in the group of patients treated conservatively compared to those treated surgically (4358/23 446 [18.6%]vs 22/359 [6.1%]). Conservatively-treated patients, with a first or second episode of diverticulitis, required surgery for recurrent disease during follow up in a maximum of 45% of cases, with larger studies reporting percentages lower than 11%. It should be emphasized that medical and surgical treatments have not ever been compared in a randomized controlled trial in patients with diverticulitis (without generalized peritonitis that is a surgical emergency). Although medical treatment results in more readmissions due to recurrence, it may be reasonable to avoid surgical therapy in the vast majority of patients with acute diverticulitis. It is unclear what the best treatment option is for younger patients (<50 years), namely whether elective surgery should be considered with the first episode of diverticulitis.

Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and feasibility of primary resection and anastomosis with or without a diverting stoma, as compared to Hartmann's procedure, for patients with acute complicated sigmoid diverticulitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE was searched for studies and trials conducted between 1966 and December 2003. This search revealed trials comparing primary resection and anastomosis to Hartmann's procedure. The term "diverticulitis, colonic" with the sub-heading "surgery" was used and the search was limited to human studies and clinical trials. Additional studies were found using the MeSH terms: "surgical procedures, operative", "surgical anastomosis", and "Hartmann procedure", combined with the term "diverticulitis, colonic". The author also searched EMBASE and the Cochrane database for clinical trials using similar terminology. No language restrictions were applied.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported 884 patients with acute complicated diverticulitis. None of these studies were randomised; it is likely that there was a significant degree of selection bias. No significant differences were found between primary resection with anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure with respect to mortality, morbidity, sepsis, wound complications and duration of procedure and anti-biotic treatment. Some studies found that primary anastomosis and a protecting stoma, with or without intra-operative colonic lavage, have more favourable results than Hartmann's procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that surgical resection and primary anastomosis in acute diverticulitis with peritonitis compares favourably with Hartmann's procedure in terms of peri-operative complications. The need for revision of Hartmann's procedure could be subsequently avoided. Some articles showed that patients with severe peritonitis, who had a diverting stoma, in the setting of resection and primary anastomosis, had the lowest complication rate. However, the quality of these studies was poor with the presence of selection bias.

Outcome of a conservative policy for managing acute sigmoid diverticulitis

Background

A conservative policy for patients presenting with acute sigmoid diverticulitis is associated with a low operation rate, and low overall and operative mortality rates. The long-term consequences of such a policy were investigated.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively for 232 patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis between 1990 and 2004. Details of all subsequent readmissions were obtained and survival to August 2005 was analysed.

Results

Of the 232 patients admitted, 60 (25·9 per cent) were known to have diverticulosis; in 172 patients it was a new diagnosis. Thirty-eight patients (16·4 per cent) underwent sigmoid resection, with one death. Three elderly patients in whom a decision was made not to operate had perforated diverticulitis at autopsy. Of 191 patients discharged without resection, 35 (18·3 per cent) subsequently underwent sigmoid resection: 26 (13·6 per cent) elective and nine (4·7 per cent) emergency, with one death.

Conclusion

A conservative policy is safe in both the short term and the long term.

Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedures

OBJECTIVE

To compare primary resection and anastomosis (PRA) with and without defunctioning stoma to Hartmann's procedure (HP) as the optimal operative strategy for patients presenting with Hinchey stage III-IV, perforated diverticulitis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The choice of operation for perforated diverticulitis lies between HP and PRA. Postoperative mortality and morbidity can be high, and the long-term consequences life-altering, with no established criteria guiding clinicians towards selecting a particular procedure.

METHODS

Probability estimates for 6879 patients with Hinchey III-IV perforated diverticulitis were obtained from two databases (n = 204), supplemented by expert opinion and summary data from 12 studies (n = 6675) published between 1980 and 2005. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from each strategy. Factors considered were the risk of permanent stoma, morbidity, and mortality from the primary or reversal operations. Decision analysis from the patient's perspective was used to calculate the optimal operative strategy and sensitivity analysis performed.

RESULTS

A total of 135 PRA, 126 primary anastomoses with defunctioning stoma (PADS), and 6619 Hartmann's procedures (HP) were considered. The probability of morbidity and mortality was 55% and 30% for PRA, 40% and 25% for PADS, and 35% and 20% for HP, respectively. Stomas remained permanent in 27% of HP and in 8% of PADS. Analysis revealed the optimal strategy to be PADS with 9.98 QALYs, compared with 9.44 QALYs after HP and 9.02 QALYs after PRA. Complications after PRA reduced patients QALYs to a baseline of 2.713. Patients with postoperative complications during both primary and reversal operations for PADS and HP had QALYs of 0.366 and 0.325, respectively. HP became the optimal strategy only when risk of complications after PRA and PADS reached 50% and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma may be the optimal strategy for selected patients with diverticular peritonitis as may represent a good compromise between postoperative adverse events, long-term quality of life and risk of permanent stoma. HP may be reserved for patients with risk of complications >40% to 50% after consideration of long-term implications.

Percutaneous CT scan-guided drainage vs. antibiotherapy alone for Hinchey II diverticulitis: a case-control study

PURPOSE

CT-scan-guided percutaneous abscess drainage of Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis is considered the best initial approach to treat conservatively the abscess and to subsequently perform an elective sigmoidectomy. However, drainage is not always technically feasible, may expose the patient to additional morbidity, and has not been critically evaluated in this indication. This study was undertaken to compare the results of percutaneous drainage vs. antibiotic therapy alone in patients with Hinchey II diverticulitis.

METHODS

This was a case-control study of all patients who presented in our institution with Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis between 1993 and 2005. Thirty-four patients underwent abscess drainage under CT-scan guidance (Group 1), and 32 patients were treated with antibiotic therapy alone (Group 2), in most cases because CT-scan-guided abscess drainage was considered technically unfeasible by the interventional radiology team. Initial conservative treatment was considered a failure when: 1) emergency surgery had to be performed, 2) signs of worsening sepsis developed, and 3) abscess recurred within four weeks of drainage.

RESULTS

The median size of abscess was 6 (range, 3-18) cm in Group 1 and 4 (range, 3-10) cm in Group 2 (P = 0.002). Median duration of drainage was 8 (range, 1-18) days. Conservative treatment failed in 11 patients (33 percent) of Group 1, and in 6 patients (19 percent) of Group 2 (P = 0.26). Ten patients (29 percent) in Group 1 and five patients (16 percent) in Group 2 underwent emergency surgery (P = 0.24); there were four postoperative deaths (26.6 percent) in this subgroup. Twelve patients (35 percent) in Group 1 and 16 patients (50 percent) in Group 2 subsequently underwent an elective sigmoid resection (P = 0.31). In this subgroup of patients, there was neither anastomotic leakage nor postoperative death.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgery for Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis carries a high mortality rate and should be avoided. To achieve this, antibiotic therapy alone seems to be a safe alternative, whenever percutaneous drainage is technically difficult or hazardous. Actually, our data did not demonstrate any benefit of CT scan-guided percutaneous abscess drainage, suggesting that the role of interventional radiology techniques in this indication deserves further critical evaluation.

Results from percutaneous drainage of Hinchey stage II diverticulitis guided by computed tomography scan

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous abscess drainage guided by computed tomography scan is considered the initial step in the management of patients presenting with Hinchey II diverticulitis. The rationale behind this approach is to manage the septic complication conservatively and to follow this later using elective sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes for Hinchey II patients who underwent percutaneous abscess drainage in our institution were reviewed. Drainage was considered a failure when signs of continuing sepsis developed, abscess or fistula recurred within 4 weeks of drainage, and emergency surgical resection with or without a colostomy had to be performed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (17 men and 17 women; median age, 71 years; range, 34-90 years) were considered for analysis. The median abscess size was 6 cm (range, 3-18 cm), and the median duration of drainage was 8 days (range, 1-18 days). Drainage was considered successful for 23 patients (67%). The causes of failure for the remaining 11 patients included continuing sepsis (n = 5), abscess recurrence (n = 5), and fistula formation (n = 1). Ten patients who failed percutaneous abscess drainage underwent an emergency Hartmann procedure, with a median delay of 14 days (range, 1-65 days) between drainage and surgery. Three patients in this group (33%) died in the immediate postoperative period. Among the 23 patients successfully drained, 12 underwent elective sigmoid resection with a primary anastomosis. The median delay between drainage and surgery was 101 days (range, 40-420 days). In this group, there were no anastomotic leaks and no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Drainage of Hinchey II diverticulitis guided by computed scan was successful in two-thirds of the cases, and 35% of the patients eventually underwent a safe elective sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis. By contrast, failure of percutaneous abscess drainage to control sepsis is associated with a high mortality rate when an emergency resection is performed. The current results demonstrate that percutaneous abscess drainage is an effective initial therapeutic approach for patients with Hinchey II diverticulitis, and that emergency surgery should be avoided whenever possible.

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for patients with diverticular disease by using meta-analytic techniques.

METHODS

Comparative studies published between 1996 and 2004 of open vs. laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease were included. The end points that were evaluated are operative and functional outcomes and adverse events. A random effects model was used during analysis of these outcomes; heterogeneity was assessed and sensitivity analysis was performed to account for bias in patient selection.

RESULTS

Twelve nonrandomized studies, incorporating 19,608 patients, were included in the analysis. One study with 18,444 patients accounted for 94.5 percent of the total sample. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in reduced infective (odds ratio, 0.61; P = 0.01), pulmonary (odds ratio, 0.4; P < 0.001), gastrointestinal tract (odds ratio, 0.75; P = 0.03), and cardiovascular complications (odds ratio, 0.28; P = 0.0008) with no significant heterogeneity. Operative time was longer with laparoscopic surgery (weighted mean difference, 67.59; P = 0.04), and length of stay was significantly shorter (weighted mean difference, -3.81; P < 0.0001); however, these outcomes demonstrated significant heterogeneity. These results remained significant throughout all the sensitivity analyses except when evaluating high-quality studies (when the study with 18,444 patients was excluded), in which only blood loss and length of stay were significantly in favor of the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results for patients selected for laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for diverticular disease are equivalent with a potential reduction in complications and hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease performed by appropriately experienced surgeons in the elective setting may be safe and feasible; because of the potential of significant bias arising from the included studies, a randomized, controlled trial is recommended.

Mortality after acute surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is almost exclusively due to patient related factors

OBJECTIVE

Auditing the outcome of surgery for complicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is difficult. A comparison of studies is hardly possible because risk factors both in terms of the severity of diverticulitis and patient-related risk factors are neither well described nor standardized. The purpose of this study was to define morbidity and mortality of primary surgery for acute complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon and to identify the relation between risk factors and morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

In a prospective computerized morbidity and mortality registration from 1990 to 2002, 114 patients, who underwent surgery on an acute or urgent base for acute complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon, were identified. In all patients the POSSUM score was calculated. To audit mortality rates a POSSUM based scoring system was introduced.

RESULTS

Mortality was 16.7%, and morbidity 71.1%. Higher morbidity rates were significantly related to a higher POSSUM physiological score (P = 0.012) and to older age (P < 0.001). Higher mortality rates also were significantly related to a higher POSSUM physiological score (P < 0.001) and older age (P = 0.003). Patients who died had significantly more sepsis (P < 0.001), multiple organ failure (P = 0.027), cardiac (P < 0.001) and pulmonary (P = 0.013) complications. Gender, operation indication and type of neither surgery nor surgeon had a significant relation with morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for acute complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon carries a high morbidity rate and a substantial mortality rate. The majority of deceased patients had severe comorbidity. Post-operative mortality and morbidity are to a large extent driven by patient related factors. Elevated physiological severity scores and a lack of peri-operative management failures express this in the majority of deceased patients.

Elective surgery after acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis is a common condition. Practice guidelines from many organizations recommend bowel resection after two attacks. The evidence for such a recommendation is reviewed.

METHODS

A Medline literature search was performed to locate English language articles on surgery for diverticular disease. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed.

RESULTS

Most people with diverticulosis are asymptomatic. Diverticular disease occurs in over 25 per cent of the population, increasing with age. After one episode of diverticulitis one-third of patients have recurrent symptoms; after a second episode a further third have a subsequent episode. Perforation is commonest during the first episode of acute diverticulitis. After recovering from an episode of diverticulitis the risk of an individual requiring an urgent Hartmann's procedure is one in 2000 patient-years of follow-up. Surgery for diverticular disease has a high complication rate and 25 per cent of patients have ongoing symptoms after bowel resection.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to support the idea that elective surgery should follow two attacks of diverticulitis. Further prospective trials are required.

The timing of elective colectomy in diverticulitis: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimal strategy for elective colectomy in patients with diverticular disease involves a balance of the morbidity, mortality, costs, and quality of life associated with both elective and expectant management. We used decision and cost analysis to simulate the clinical and economic outcomes after recovery from an episode of nonsurgically treated diverticulitis to determine the preferable management strategy.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov model was constructed to evaluate lifetime risks of death and colostomy, care costs, and quality of life associated with elective colectomy after subsequent episodes of diverticulitis. The analysis was from the payer's perspective, using hypothetical cohorts of 35- and 50-year-old patients who recovered from a nonsurgically treated diverticulitis episode. Probabilities of clinical events and costs for the base-case analysis were derived from a large cohort using a statewide administrative database and published estimates.

RESULTS

Performing colectomy after the fourth rather than the second episode in patients older than 50 years resulted in 0.5% fewer deaths, 0.7% fewer colostomies, and saved US 1,035 dollars per patient. In younger patients, performing colectomy after the fourth episode compared with the first episode resulted in 0.1% fewer deaths, 2% fewer colostomies, and saved US 5,429 dollars per patient. Expectant management through three recurrent episodes with elective colectomy after the fourth episode was the dominant strategy across the full range of the variables tested in the sensitivity analysis compared with earlier intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that expectant management is associated with lower rates of death and colostomy and is cost-saving for both younger and older patients.

Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review was designed to summarize and compare the reported outcomes of one-stage and two-stage operations for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis.

METHODS

This review identified 98 published studies (1957-2003) dealing with the surgical management of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, either with primary resection and anastomosis or with the Hartmann's procedure. Aggregated results of adverse outcomes were calculated but statistical comparisons were not appropriate because of data and design heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Operative mortality data from patients with diverticular peritonitis undergoing Hartmann's procedure (n = 1,051) were derived from 54 studies. Considering the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal procedures together, the mortality rate was 19.6 percent (18.8 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 0.8 percent for its reversal), the wound infection rate was 29.1 percent (24.2 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 4.9 percent for its reversal), and stoma complications and anastomotic leaks (in the reversal operation) occurred in 10.3 and 4.3 percent, respectively. Of 569 reported cases of primary anastomosis from 50 studies, the aggregated mortality rate was 9.9 (range, 0-75) percent with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.9 (range, 0-60) percent and a wound infection rate of 9.6 (range, 0-26) percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported mortality and morbidity in patients with diverticular peritonitis who underwent primary anastomosis were not higher than those in patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure were. This suggests that primary anastomosis is a safe operative alternative in certain patients with peritonitis. Despite inclusion of only patients with peritonitis in this analysis, selection bias may have been a limitation and a prospective, randomized trial is recommended.

Recent advances in diverticular disease

Diverticulosis is the most common structural abnormality of the colon. Although most people with colonic diverticula remain asymptomatic, a significant proportion of those affected develop symptoms and may suffer from complications. Whereas early research in diverticular disease addressed the pathogenesis of the condition, recent work has focused on symptomatic or complicated disease. Recent epidemiologic studies have attempted to identify patients who are at increased risk of perforated diverticular disease, and developing knowledge in neurogastroenterology has suggested mechanisms responsible for underlying chronically symptomatic disease. Further research in these areas has the potential to provide targeted therapeutic strategies for people with colonic diverticula.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and the risk of perforated colonic diverticular disease

BACKGROUND

Acute perforated colonic diverticular disease has a mortality rate of up to 30 per cent, but little is known about its aetiology. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that three classes of drugs, namely non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioid analgesics and corticosteroids, are risk factors for perforated diverticular disease.

METHODS

All patients with confirmed perforated colonic diverticular disease were identified over a 5-year period in two hospitals in Norfolk, UK. Two control groups were selected and matched for age, sex and hospital of admission. Data on medication use were obtained from hospital records. Odds ratios for each drug were calculated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Opioid analgesics, NSAIDs and corticosteroids were all positively associated with perforated colonic diverticular disease. The odds ratio for opioid analgesics was 1.8 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.1 to 3.0) in the analysis with ophthalmology controls and 3.1 (95 per cent c.i. 1.8 to 5.5) in that with dermatology controls. Respective odds ratios for NSAIDs were 4.0 (95 per cent c.i. 2.1 to 7.6) and 3.7 (95 per cent c.i. 2.0 to 6.8), and those for corticosteroids were 5.7 (95 per cent c.i. 2.2 to 14.4) and 7.8 (95 per cent c.i. 2.6 to 23.3).

CONCLUSION

Opioid analgesics, NSAIDs and corticosteroids are all positively associated with perforated colonic diverticular disease. The consistency of these associations, together with plausible biological mechanisms, suggests that these drugs may have a causative role in this condition.

Epidemiology of perforated colonic diverticular disease

Perforated colonic diverticular disease results in considerable mortality and morbidity. This review appraises existing evidence on the epidemiology and mechanisms of perforation, highlights areas of further study, and suggests an epidemiological approach towards preventing the condition. Computerised searches were used to identify published articles relating to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of perforated colonic diverticular disease. Several drug and dietary exposures have potential biological mechanisms for causing perforation. Of these only non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been consistently identified as risk factors in aetiological studies. The causes of perforated colonic diverticular disease remain largely unknown. Further aetiological studies, looking specifically at perforation, are required to investigate whether cause-effect relationships exist for both drug and dietary exposures. The identification of risk factors for perforation would allow primary public health prevention, secondary risk factor modification, and early prophylactic surgery to be aimed at people at high risk.

Acute colonic diverticulitis in patients under 50 years of age

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy concerning the virulence and management of diverticulitis in young patients. This study reports on the management of acute diverticulitis with reference to the virulence and outcome of the disease with respect to age.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and June 1999, 327 patients were treated for acute left colonic diverticulitis. Patients were divided in two groups: those aged 50 years or less (group 1, 72 patients) and those older than 50 years (group 2, 255 patients). The diagnosis was confirmed histologically or radiologically in all patients.

RESULTS

There were differences in gender distribution related to age (P < 0.001). During the first hospital stay, 226 patients (69.1 per cent) had successful conservative treatment, 78 (23.9 per cent) needed emergency surgery and 23 (7.0 per cent) had a semielective operation (P = 0.47). The recurrence rate was 25.5 per cent in group 1 and 22.3 per cent in group 2 (P = 0.93). The type of surgical procedure and grade of peritonitis in emergency patients were similar in the two groups. Overall the mortality rate in patients who underwent an operation was 16.3 per cent. The mortality rate was zero in group 1 and 2.2 per cent in group 2 after elective or semielective operation (P = 1.0), and zero in group 1 and 34.9 per cent in group 2 after emergency operation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Diverticulitis in young patients does not have a particularly aggressive course and the risk of recurrence is similar to that of older patients.

Diverticulitis

Although diverticular disease is common in the Western world, few patients who develop diverticulitis require surgery. The use of appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis can be an effective treatment, avoiding the need for acute surgical intervention. In the event of surgery the choice of procedure is dictated by the degree of contamination and the expertise of the operating surgeon. This chapter will outline the modern management of diverticulitis, from steps in diagnosis to different surgical options in each clinical scenario, thus aiding clinicians on a practical level.

Complicated diverticulosis

"Uncomplicated" diverticulitis can be prevented from progressing into "complicated" diverticulitis by early diagnosis and active medical treatment. Complicated diverticulitis develops from a peridiverticular abscess, to a perforation with peritonitis, to fistulation into adjacent viscera, to luminal narrowing by inflammation or stricture formation causing obstruction. Computer tomography (CT) scanning is the diagnostic imaging modality when diverticulitis is suspected and allows percutaneous drainage of peridiverticular abscesses that will enhance the effect of antibiotic therapy with resolution of the acute episode in 75% of patients. Thus, an emergent or urgent operation is converted to an elective operation and a two-stage operative procedure, namely a temporary stoma and a second operation, is avoided. Interventional surgery is urgent for perforation and obstruction. While a Hartmann's resection and temporary colostomy has been the favoured operative procedure, under favourable conditions resection with primary anastomosis is preferable. Although a temporary stoma may be required with primary anastomosis, and hence the procedure is a two-stage one similar to a Hartmann's, the closure of the stoma is less demanding and has a lower morbidity. A single-stage resection and anastomosis is the standard elective treatment for symptomatic fistulas and strictures.

Epidemiology of diverticular disease

Diverticulosis, which is an acquired condition marked by mucosal herniation through defects in the colonic wall, has been termed both a "disease of the 20th century" and a "disease of Western civilization" due to its increasing prevalence in modern times and its striking geographical variability. Both of these epidemiological observations may provide interesting insights into the pathophysiology of diverticulosis. This chapter will review the known epidemiology of diverticulosis coli and its main complications: diverticulitis and diverticular haemorrhage. Where possible, attempts will be made to place these observational reports in the context of both the cause and clinical behaviour of this disorder.