Prospective randomized study of surgical morbidity following primary systemic therapy for breast cancer

Changing the role of pCR in breast cancer treatment - an unjustifiable interpretation of a good prognostic factor as a "factor for a good prognosis"

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) of early breast cancer (EBC) has been recognized as a good prognostic factor in the treatment of breast cancer because of its significant correlation with long-term disease outcome. Based on this correlation, pCR has been accepted by health authorities (FDA, EMA) as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for accelerated drug approval. Moreover, in recent years, we have observed a tendency to treat pCR in routine clinical practice as a primary therapeutic target rather than just one of the pieces of information obtained from clinical trials. These trends in routine clinical practice are the result of recommendations in treatment guidelines, such as the ESMO recommendation "…to deliver all planned (neoadjuvant) treatment without unnecessary breaks, i.e. without dividing it into preoperative and postoperative periods, irrespective of the magnitude of tumor response", because "…this will increase the probability of achieving pCR, which is a proven factor for a good prognosis…". We hypothesize that the above recommendations and trends in routine clinical practice are the consequences of misunderstanding regarding the concept of pCR, which has led to a shift in its importance from a prognostic factor to a desired treatment outcome. The origin of this misunderstanding could be a strong subconscious incentive to achieve pCR, as patients who achieved pCR after NAST had a better long-term outcome compared with those who did not. In this paper, we attempt to prove our hypothesis. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the therapeutic effects of NAST and adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) in EBC to determine whether pCR, as a phenomenon that can only be achieved at NAST, improves prognosis per se. We used published papers as a source of data, which had a decisive influence on the formation of the modern attitude towards EBC therapy. We were unable to find any evidence supporting the use of pCR as a desired therapeutic goal because NAST (reinforced by pCR) was never demonstrated to be superior to AST in any context.

Breast Radiotherapy after Oncoplastic Surgery-A Multidisciplinary Approach

Oncoplastic breast surgery encompasses a range of techniques used to provide equitable oncological outcomes compared with standard breast surgery while, simultaneously, prioritizing aesthetic outcomes. While the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery are promising, it can add an extra complexity to the treatment paradigm of breast cancer and impact on decision-making surrounding adjuvant therapies, like chemotherapy and radiotherapy. As such, early discussions at the multidisciplinary team meeting with surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists present, should be encouraged to facilitate best patient care.

Association of Clinical Complications of Chemotherapy and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Importance

Women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction often require chemotherapy. The effects of chemotherapy on reconstruction are not well described.

Objective

To evaluate the association of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with complications and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in immediate reconstruction.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study is a cohort study that prospectively assessed PROs and retrospectively evaluated complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based or autologous reconstruction at 11 centers from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. Women 18 years or older undergoing immediate reconstruction after mastectomy with 2 years of follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if they had prophylactic mastectomy; delayed reconstruction; mixed-timing reconstruction; mixed reconstruction; a latissimus dorsi, superior gluteal artery perforator, or inferior gluteal artery perforator flap; or both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were analyzed from May 1 to June 30, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Complications and PROs (satisfaction with breast and physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, a validated, condition-specific PRO measure. Baseline patient characteristics were collected.

Results

A total of 1881 women were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 49.9 [9.9] years). Of these, 1373 (73.0%) underwent implant-based procedures; 508 (27.0%), autologous reconstruction; 200 (10.6%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 668 (35.5%), adjuvant chemotherapy; and 1013 (53.9%), no chemotherapy. Patients without chemotherapy were significantly older (mean [SD] age, 51.6 [9.4] years; P < .001), and patients with chemotherapy were more likely to have received radiotherapy (108 of 200 [54.0%] for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 321 of 668 [48.1%] for adjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001). Among the cohort undergoing implant-based reconstruction, the rates of any complication were significantly different, with higher rates seen for adjuvant (153 of 490 [31.2%]) and neoadjuvant (44 of 153 [28.8%]) chemotherapy compared with no chemotherapy (176 of 730 [24.1%]; P = .02). On multivariable analysis, these differences were not statistically significant. For autologous reconstruction, no significant differences in complications were observed. Controlling for clinical covariates, no significant differences were seen across chemotherapy groups for the BREAST-Q subscales except for sexual well-being in the implant cohort, in which adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly lower scores (β, -4.97 [95% CI, -8.68 to -1.27]; P = .009).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the likelihood of complications in patients undergoing implant-based or autologous reconstruction, and chemotherapy was not associated with patient satisfaction with reconstruction or psychosocial well-being. This information can help patients and clinicians make informed decisions about breast reconstruction in the setting of chemotherapy.

Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The present systematic review and meta-analysis critically assessed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nACT) in comparison to ACT in breast cancer patients in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing NACT with ACT in breast cancer patients were identified through Medline and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials on January 21, 2016. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects method depending on heterogeneity (I 2). Grading of the evidences was also done. Subgroup meta-analysis on the basis of total preoperative chemotherapy or sandwich chemotherapy was also performed. Results: The present meta-analysis shows increased breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rate (n = 9, risk ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.19 [1.03–1.37]) with NACT. Further, NACT was found equally effective regarding overall survival (n = 15, hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] = 0.98 [0.89–1.08]), disease-free survival (DFS) (n = 14, HR [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.86–1.18]), and distant metastasis (n = 13, HR [95% CI] = 0.97 [0.82–1.16]). Although locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was noted to be significantly higher in NACT group (n = 15, HR [95% CI] = 1.23 [1.06–1.43]), its significance disappeared (n = 13, HR [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.98–1.40]) by excluding the trials where surgery was not provided for patients with complete tumor response. After excluding such trials, preoperative NACT was associated with increased BCS with similar LRR in ACT group. Discussion: NACT has no major impact on breast cancer survival. However, it is associated with increased BCS rates. NACT downgrades tumor size facilitating more BCSs without increasing LRR. The evidences were graded for all outcomes as high except DFS and BCS as moderate.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy does not Increase Complications in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) broadens the indications for breast conservation. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NAC) is used increasingly in the treatment of patients with early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes for patients who received NAC followed by OBCS.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent OBCS involving the mastopexy/breast-reduction technique, including synchronous mastopexy/breast reduction for symmetry, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2010 and January 2016. Patients who had received NAC were compared with those who had undergone surgery first. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected.

RESULTS

The study included 429 patients, corresponding to 713 breasts. Of these patients, 122, corresponding to 199 breasts, received NAC. The patients who received NAC were younger (p < 0.001) and had a more advanced cancer stage (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate per patient was 25.9%, with major complications occurring in 9.1% of the patients. After adjustment for risk factors, NAC was not shown to be associated with an increased risk of complications or delayed adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.37), irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen used or whether the interval between NAC and surgery was 4 weeks or longer.

CONCLUSIONS

In a high-volume center, OBCS can be performed safely for carefully selected patients after NAC without an increased risk of complications or delayed adjuvant radiation therapy. An interval of at least 4 weeks between completion of NAC and surgery can be regarded as safe irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen used.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment and the Evidence-Based Interaction with Immediate Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

This article aims to determine the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction by assessing their compatibility for oncological safety and the incidence and management of postoperative complications. A review of scientific publications published between 2009 and 2017 was undertaken. The relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction was analyzed to compile and assess the potential interaction between the procedures. The search was limited to English language publications, but there were no limiting factors at the level of study typology. Full-text articles, including the references leading to other relevant studies, were evaluated.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) increases breast conservation rates in patients with resectable breast cancer at the associated cost of higher locoregional recurrence rates; however, the magnitude of the survival benefits of NAC for these patients remains undefined. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the survival benefit of NAC versus postoperative chemotherapy by conducting an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The authors searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese biomedical literature database, and Chinese Scientific Journals full-text database from their inception to December 2016. The authors identified relevant RCTs that compared NAC with postoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

A total of 21 citations representing 16 unique studies were eligible. There were 787 deaths among 2794 patients assigned to NAC groups and 816 deaths among 2799 patients assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy groups. A meta-analysis of data indicated that there was no significant benefit in terms of OS ([hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.13, P = .51) and RFS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.10, P = .80) between the NAC and postoperative chemotherapy groups. The pooled HR estimate for OS was not influenced by NAC cycles, the total number of chemotherapy cycles, administration of tamoxifen, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, or type of NAC regimen. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR estimate for RFS was influenced by anthracycline-containing regimens. Patients with a pathological complete response had superior survival outcomes compared with patients who had residual disease.

CONCLUSION

The survival benefits for patients with operable breast cancer who received either NAC or adjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline regimens were comparable.

Impact of different type of cancer treatment on the effectiveness of breast reconstruction

For women undergoing mastectomy as part of their breast cancer treatment, breast reconstruction is an important part of therapy. However, neoadjuvant, adjuvant treatments as well as other patient-related factors can compromise the results of breast reconstruction techniques. In this article we have reviewed current approaches to the management of complications and risks that neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies pose on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Non-treatment related factors influencing reconstruction techniques were reviewed as well.

The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK. The introduction of techniques to augment the subpectoral pocket has revolutionised the procedure, but there is a lack of high-quality outcome data to describe the safety or effectiveness of these techniques. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the best way of comparing treatments, but surgical RCTs are challenging. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study aims to determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic RCT to examine the effectiveness of approaches to IBBR.

METHODS/DESIGN

The iBRA study is a trainee-led research collaborative project with four phases:Phase 1 - a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practicePhase 2 - a multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing IBBR to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomesPhase 3- an IBBR-RCT acceptability survey and qualitative work to explore patients' and surgeons' views of proposed trial designs and candidate outcomes.Phase 4 - phases 1 to 3 will inform the design and conduct of the future RCT All centres offering IBBR will be encouraged to participate by the breast and plastic surgical professional associations (Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons). Data collected will inform the feasibility of undertaking an RCT by defining current practice and exploring issues surrounding recruitment, selection of comparator arms, choice of primary outcome, sample size, selection criteria, trial conduct, methods of data collection and feasibility of using the trainee collaborative model to recruit patients and collect data.

DISCUSSION

The preliminary work undertaken within the iBRA study will determine the feasibility, design and conduct of a definitive RCT in IBBR. It will work with the trainee collaborative to build capacity by creating an infrastructure of research-active breast and plastic surgeons which will facilitate future high-quality research that will ultimately improve outcomes for all women seeking reconstructive surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN37664281.

Pretreatment health measures and complications after surgical management of elderly women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with breast cancer are less likely to be offered surgery, partly owing to co-morbidities and reduced functional ability. However, there is little consensus on how best to assess surgical risk in this patient group.

METHODS

The ability of pretreatment health measures to predict complications was investigated in a prospective cohort study of a consecutive series of women aged at least 70 years undergoing surgery for operable (stage I-IIIa) breast cancer at 22 English breast units between 2010 and 2013. Data on treatment, surgical complications, health measures and tumour characteristics were collected by case-note review and/or patient interview. Outcome measures were all complications and serious complications within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 664 women. One or more complications were experienced by 41·0 per cent of the patients, predominantly seroma or primary/minor infections. Complications were serious in 6·5 per cent. More extensive surgery predicted a higher number of complications, but not serious complications. Older age did not predict complications. Several health measures were associated with complications in univariable analysis, and were included in multivariable analyses, adjusting for type/extent of surgery and tumour characteristics. In the final models, pain predicted a higher count of complications (incidence rate ratio 1·01, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·01; P = 0·004). Fatigue (odds ratio (OR) 1·02, 95 per cent c.i. 1·01 to 1·03; P = 0·004), low platelet count (OR 4·19, 1·03 to 17·12: P = 0·046) and pulse rate (OR 0·96, 0·93 to 0·99; P = 0·010) predicted serious complications.

CONCLUSION

The risk of serious complications from breast surgery is low for older patients. Surgical decisions should be based on patient fitness rather than age. Health measures that predict surgical risk were identified in multivariable models, but the effects were weak, with 95 per cent c.i. close to unity.

Time to be BRAVE: is educating surgeons the key to unlocking the potential of randomised clinical trials in surgery? A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Well-designed randomised clinical trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence to inform decision-making and should be the default option for evaluating surgical procedures. Such trials can be challenging, and surgeons' preferences may influence whether trials are initiated and successfully conducted and their results accepted. Preferences are particularly problematic when surgeons' views play a key role in procedure selection and patient eligibility. The bases of such preferences have rarely been explored. Our aim in this qualitative study was to investigate surgeons' preferences regarding the feasibility of surgical RCTs and their understanding of study design issues using breast reconstruction surgery as a case study.

METHODS

Semistructured qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of 35 professionals practicing at 15 centres across the United Kingdom. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using constant comparative techniques. Sampling, data collection and analysis were conducted concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Surgeons often struggle with the concept of equipoise. We found that if surgeons did not feel 'in equipoise', they did not accept randomisation as a method of treatment allocation. The underlying reasons for limited equipoise were limited appreciation of the methodological weaknesses of data derived from nonrandomised studies and little understanding of pragmatic trial design. Their belief in the value of RCTs for generating high-quality data to change or inform practice was not widely held.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to help surgeons understand evidence, equipoise and bias. Current National Institute of Health Research/Medical Research Council investment into education and infrastructure for RCTs, combined with strong leadership, may begin to address these issues or more specific interventions may be required.

Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification

INTRODUCTION

There are no published data on standardized scoring systems for morbidity after breast cancer surgery. Aim of the study was to establish the Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC) as assessment tool and to identify risk factors for morbidity after breast surgery investigating new techniques including oncoplastic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2010, data were retrospectively evaluated from 485 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery at a university hospital. The CDC was used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were adjusted by body-mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus and tumour size.

RESULTS

Overall complications (CDC 1-4) were reported in 28.7%. Second surgery related to major complications (CDC 3-4) was mandatory in 4.7%. Axillary dissection was an independent predictor for CDC 1-4 in all patients (P = 0.008, OR of 1.81, 95%CI 1.17-2.82). We found no independent predictor for CDC 3-4. Oncoplastic surgery increased the rate of wound infections (P = 0.010, OR: 2.94, 95%CI 1.30-6.67) and necroses (P < 0.001, OR: 8.38, 95%CI 3.28-21.4). Axillary dissection elevated wound infection (P = 0.040, OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.03-4.14) and seroma rates (P < 0.001, OR: 2.46, 95%CI 1.51-4.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The CDC is a valid assessment tool for future clinical trials and may be useful for hospital quality control. While axillary dissection and oncoplastic surgery raised morbidity, no single factor predicted for morbidity related second surgery.

Effects of dextran-40 on flap viability after modified radical mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management of patients after modified radical mastectomy has evolved over the past decades. In the early postoperative period, wound complication rates were reported to be as high as 60%. Flap necrosis after modified radical mastectomy is a common problem encountered by surgeons. Various treatment strategies have been proposed in the literature but none have addressed the use of dextran-40.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether dextran-40 infusion improves skin flap viability after modified radical mastectomy.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy were randomly assigned to receive dextran-40 or no dextran-40 intraoperatively after flap dissection. Patients were followed prospectively over a five-year period in a community hospital. The incidence of postmastectomy skin flap necrosis and prognosis of the necrotic area after dextran-40 infusion was observed.

RESULTS

Flap necrosis was observed in five (17.8%) patients. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were found to be risk factors for the development of flap necrosis (P<0.05). Flap thickness and tension on the flaps were found to be related to flap necrosis. Six of seven patients with flap perfusion problems (ecchymosis or necrosis) underwent dextran-40 treatment and healed without graft replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Dextran-40 treatment did not affect development of flap necrosis. However, if necrosis had already developed, the necrotic area of the skin flaps improved with dextran-40 treatment.

Impact of chemotherapy sequencing on local-regional failure risk in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate long-term local-regional control rates after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for patients undergoing surgery before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

There were 2983 patients who underwent segmental mastectomy with whole-breast irradiation from 1987 to 2005. Clinicopathological and outcome data were reviewed, and comparisons were made between those undergoing surgery before and those undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 2331 patients (78%) who underwent surgery first and 652 (22%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had more advanced disease at baseline and more adverse clinicopathological features. The 5- and 10-year local-regional recurrence (LRR)-free survival rates were 97% [95% confidence interval (CI), 96-98) and 94% (95% CI, 93-95) for surgery first and 93% (95% CI, 91-95) and 90% (95% CI, 87-93) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences in LRR-free survival rates when comparing the presenting clinical stage (P = NS). Of 607 patients presenting with clinical stage II/III disease, chemotherapy downstaged 313 patients (52%) to pathological stage 0/I disease; 294 (48%) had residual stage II/III disease. In multivariate analysis, an age less than 50 years, clinical stage III, grade 3, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease, estrogen receptor-positive disease without receipt of endocrine therapy, lymphovascular invasion, multifocal disease on pathology, and close/positive margins were associated with LRR. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significant when added to the model. Adjusting for adverse factors, there were no differences in LRR between patients who underwent surgery before and those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LRR after BCT is driven by tumor biology and disease stage. Appropriately selected patients can achieve high rates of local-regional control with BCT with either upfront surgery or surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

The literature reports overall complication rates in breast reconstruction to be as high as 60 percent. Infection rates can exceed 20 percent, much higher than anticipated in clean elective surgery. There is no consensus among surgeons regarding the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines suggest only 24 hours. This systematic review examines antibiotic regimens and associated infection rates in breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Systematic electronic searches were performed in the PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases using Medical Subject Headings terms for studies reporting antibiotic use and infection in all forms of breast reconstruction. Studies between 1970 and 2011 were reviewed. Included publications were required to report an antibiotic protocol and infection rate.

RESULTS

A total of 834 abstracts were identified, 81 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The overall reported infection rates in the included studies varied between 0 and 29 percent (average, 5.8 percent). When comparing combined patient cohorts receiving no antibiotics, less than 24 hours, and greater than 24 hours, the average infection rates were 14.4, 5.8, and 5.8 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis following breast reconstruction. No benefit was found in patients who received more than 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Standardized definitions for antibiotic regimens, unit of analysis reporting, and a new breast reconstruction surgical-site infection grading system are offered to improve standardized outcome documentation. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to best determine an optimal antibiotic regimen.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The impact of obesity on breast cancer: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been linked to many adverse health consequences, including breast cancer; however, the impact on clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes has yet to be clearly defined.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients treated at a single institution for invasive breast cancer from 2000-2008 comparing two groups: nonobese (body mass index of <30) and obese (body mass index of ≥ 30) patients. Continuous variables, categorical variables, and survival data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 1352 total patients, 76% were classified as nonobese and 24% were obese. When comparing age, obese patients presented less frequently than nonobese patients <50 years old (10% vs. 90%), and when comparing patients >50 years old (18% vs. 82%, P = 0.0019). Obese patients were more likely to present with disease detected by imaging when compared to nonobese patients (67% vs. 56%, P = 0.0006). Obese patients had larger tumors (1.7 cm vs. 1.4 cm, P < 0.001) and higher rates of lymph node (LN) metastases (31% vs. 25%, P = 0.026). On multivariate analysis, obesity was associated with nonpalpable tumors, larger tumors, a higher incidence of LN metastasis, lower incidence of Her2 positivity, lower incidence of multifocality, and less likely to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients clinically present at older ages with mammographically detected breast cancer at more advanced stages than nonobese patients. Strategies to encourage screening among the obese patient population are important.

Preoperative taxane-based chemotherapy in a standardized protocol for locally advanced breast cancer

AIMS

To assess the feasibility of a standardized multidisciplinary protocol for the management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We also evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting the extent of residual disease.

METHODS

Patients with LABC were offered preoperative chemotherapy of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) , doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) , cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (TAC), every 21 days for six cycles, until progression or intolerable toxicity. MRI and PET were performed at baseline and six cycles. Patients underwent a mastectomy or complete local excision, followed by radiotherapy. Trastuzumab and endocrine treatment were recommended where appropriate.

RESULTS

Between April 2005 and October 2006, 51 patients were included from three institutions, and 50 received TAC (90% commenced within 35 days of diagnosis), with 44 patients completing six cycles (88%). Pathological complete response was seen in 10 patients (19.6%); all had invasive ductal carcinoma. No patient with invasive lobular carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. MRI was the most accurate method of assessing the extent of residual cancer. In total, 45 (88%) patients underwent surgery within the protocol-specified time and 12 (23%) patients had breast conservation surgery. At a median follow-up of 41.3 months, there were three local recurrences. Ten patients (19.6%) developed distant metastases, resulting in an 80% actuarial disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This regimen of TAC is effective and well-tolerated and is likely to result in improved outcomes since patients can receive optimal multimodality treatments.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy defines the preoperative administration of systemic therapy in order to downstage the primary tumor and affected lymph nodes to improve the surgical approach. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of early operable breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the available data of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with emphasis on tumor response assessment and prediction, and locoregional management.

METHODS

We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE using the search terms breast cancer, neoadjuvant or preoperative or primary or induction, and chemotherapy from 1950 to 1 March 2009.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast conservation with equal survival and locoregional control. Tumor response assessment during neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows identification of in vivo tumor sensitivity to different agents which will help determine predictive factors for improved selection criteria. Randomized trials assessing the timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy in initially lymph node positive patients are warranted. In the near future, intraoperative fluorescent imaging and targeting of cancer stem cells will become important avenues of research.

Impact of obesity on diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer

In this population-based study, we evaluated the impact of obesity on presentation, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Among all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the canton Geneva (Switzerland) between 2003 and 2005, we identified those with information on body mass index (BMI) and categorized them into normal/underweight (BMI <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI > or =-<30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) women. Using multivariate logistic regression, we compared tumour, diagnosis and treatment characteristics between groups. Obese women presented significantly more often with stage III-IV disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)]: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.0-3.3). Tumours > or =1 cm and pN2-N3 lymph nodes were significantly more often impalpable in obese than in normal/underweight patients (OR(adj) 2.4, [1.1-5.3] and OR(adj) 5.1, [1.0-25.4], respectively). Obese women were less likely to have undergone ultrasound (OR(adj) 0.5, [0.3-0.9]) and MRI (OR(adj) 0.3, [0.1-0.6]) and were at increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR(adj) 4.7, [2.0-10.9]). This study finds important diagnostic and therapeutic differences between obese and lean women, which may impair survival of obese women with breast cancer. Specific strategies are needed to optimize the care of obese women with or at risk of breast cancer.

Combination of physical activity, nutrition, or other metabolic factors and vaccine response

A number of lifestyle factors that reduce cancer risk in the primary prevention setting may be potential new targets for use in combination with cancer vaccines. This review discusses the modulation of energy balance (physical activity, calorie restriction, and obesity prevention), and the supplementation with natural and synthetic analogs of vitamins A and E, as potential interventions for use in combination with cancer vaccines. Additionally, the pharmacologic manipulation of nutrient metabolism in the tumor microenvironment (e.g., arachidonic acid, arginine, tryptophan, and glucose metabolism) is discussed. This review includes a brief overview of the role of each agent in primary cancer prevention; outlines the effects of these agents on immune function, specifically adaptive and/or anti-tumor immune mechanisms, when known; and discusses the potential use of these interventions in combination with therapeutic cancer vaccines. Modulation of energy balance through exercise and strategies targeting nutrient metabolism in the tumor microenvironment represent the most promising interventions to partner with therapeutic cancer vaccines. Additionally, the use of vitamin E succinate and the retinoid X receptor-directed rexinoids in combination with cancer vaccines offer promise. In summary, a number of energy balance- and nutrition-related interventions are viable candidates for further study in combination with cancer vaccines.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer can avoid mastectomy by shrinkage of tumour volume. This review assesses the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on clinical outcome.

Methods

All randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were reviewed systematically and meta-analyses were performed.

Results

Fourteen studies randomizing 5500 women were eligible for analysis. Overall survival was equivalent in both groups. In the neoadjuvant group, the mastectomy rate was lower (relative risk 0·71 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·67 to 0·75)) without hampering local control (hazard ratio 1·12 (95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 1·37)). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated fewer adverse effects.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an established treatment option for early breast cancer.

Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care in locally advanced breast cancer to achieve local tumour downsizing in order to make surgery possible. Since the early 1980s, the role of preoperative chemotherapy in early stage (or operable) breast cancer has been the subject of study. Potential advantages are early introduction of systemic therapy, determination of chemosensitivity, reduction of tumour volume and downstaging of surgical requirement. Concerns exist about local control after downsized surgery and the delay of local treatment in patients with tumours resistant to chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer when compared to postoperative chemotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Specialised Register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 4th of August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing preoperative chemotherapy with postoperative in women with operable breast cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted by two independent review authors. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes directly or indirectly using the methods described by Parmar. Relative risks were derived for dichotomous outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible studies which randomised a total of 5,500 women. Median follow-up ranged from 18 to 124 months. Eight studies described a satisfactory method of randomisation.Data, based on 1139 estimated deaths in 4620 women available for analysis, show equivalent overall survival rates with a HR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.09; p, 0.67; no heterogeneity). Preoperative chemotherapy increases breast conservation rates, yet at the associated cost of increased loco regional recurrence rates. However, this rate was not increased as long as surgery remains part of the treatment even after complete tumour regression (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.37; p, 0.25; no heterogeneity. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with fewer adverse effects. Pathological complete response is associated with better survival than residual disease (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69; p, < 10-4).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests safe application of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of women with early stage breast cancer in order to down-stage surgical requirement, to evaluate chemosensitivity and to facilitate translational research.

Sequelae following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has a central role in the surgical management of breast cancer; however, it is associated with a potentially significant morbidity. Although post-ALND complications are often minor, in some cases they can persist for a long time following surgery, thereby affecting the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Seroma formation and altered sensation of the upper limb are the two most common complications following ALND. Lymphedema is the most common potentially severe long-term complication following ALND. Major post-ALND complications (such as injury or thrombosis of the axillary vein and injury to the motor nerves of the axilla) are extremely rare. Meticulous surgical technique and careful selection of patients for postoperative radiation therapy are mandatory to prevent significant morbidity following ALND. The introduction of the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinical practice has resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of post-ALND complications.

Evidence-Based Risk Factors for Seroma Formation in Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

Seroma is a common problem in breast surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to identify risk factors for seroma formation.

METHODS

Articles published in English were obtained from searches of Medline and additional references were found in the bibliographies of these articles. Risk factors were graded according to the quality and strength of evidence and to the direction of association.

RESULTS

One meta-analysis, 51 randomized controlled trials, 7 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies were identified. There was no risk factor supported by strong evidence, but there was moderate evidence to support a risk for seroma formation in individuals with heavier body weight, extended radical mastectomy as compared with simple mastectomy, and greater drainage volume in the initial 3 days. On the other hand, the following factors did not have a significant influence on seroma formation: duration of drainage; hormone receptor status; immobilization of the shoulder; intensity of negative suction pressure; lymph node status or lymph node positivity; number of drains; number of removed lymph nodes; previous biopsy; removal of drains on the fifth postoperative day versus when daily drainage volume fell to minimal; stage; type of drainage (closed suction versus static drainage); and use of fibrinolysis inhibitor. In contrast, sentinel lymph node biopsy reduced seroma formation. Evidence was weak, or unproven, for other factors that were commonly cited in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a number of factors have been correlated with seroma formation, strong evidence is still scarce. However, there is evidence showing that sentinel lymph node biopsy reduces seroma formation.

Pathophysiology of seroma in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Seroma is the most common complication of mastectomy. The aim of this systematic review is to clarify the pathophysiology of seroma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computer-assisted MEDLINE search was conducted, and additional references were found in the bibliographies of these articles. The reference terms ''breast cancer'', ''mastectomy'', ''seroma'', ''lymphocele'' and ''lymphocyst'' were used as both keyword and subject terms. The search was limited to studies published in English.

RESULTS

The definition of seroma was highly variable across studies, but was most commonly a seroma large enough to be noticed by the patient or medical staff and affecting the patient's satisfaction in the immediate or acute postoperative period. So far, only limited data are available on the severity of seroma. With respect to the pathophysiology of seroma, the data indicated that several anatomical factors, especially dead space, likely contribute to seroma formation. However, it was obscure whether seroma was due to lymph-like fluid or exudate.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variability in the way seroma is defined across studies, and its pathophysiology remains uncertain.

Factors that influence volume and duration of wound drainage after mastectomy and level III axillary node clearance

Factors influencing drainage after operations for breast cancer remain controversial. The total volume and duration of drainage was prospectively measured in 252 women undergoing mastectomy and level III axillary clearance, and compared to patient, operative and tumour factors, using multivariate analysis. The total drainage and duration, respectively, correlated with the weight of the patient (r=0.39, P<0.01; r=0.29, P<0.01) and breast weight (r=0.37, P<0.01; r=0.29, P<0.01), and was predicted by the volume on the first postoperative day (r=0.58, P<0.01; r=0.50, P<0.01). There was no correlation with age, blood loss, length of operation, tumour size, number of axillary nodes retrieved, or whether nodes were involved by cancer. The volume and duration of drainage appear thus to be simply a function of the area of tissue planes opened.

Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen

Morphological characteristics, grading features, proliferation marker MIB1, apoptosis (by Tdt-mediated duTP-biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL)), Bcl-2 expression, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status were compared in ER-positive breast cancers before and after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Daily treatment was with letrozole 2.5 mg (12 patients) or 10 mg (12 patients), or with tamoxifen 20 mg(24 patients). Letrozole treatment was associated with a pathological response in 17 of 24 (71%) patients. The predominant change in grading features was a decrease in mitosis, and the expression of MIB1 was reduced in all of the 22 evaluable cases. Whilst only marginal changes were observed in ER expression following letrozole therapy, PgR reactivity was reduced in 20 of 21 evaluable cases which were initially PgR-positive, becoming undetectable in 16 patients. Tamoxifen treatment was associated with pathological response in 15 of 24 (63%) tumours. In contrast to letrozole, the dominant change in grading feature was an increase in tubule formation, ER score was markedly reduced in most cases, and the most common effect on PgR was an increased expression. Following treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole, variable effects were observed on the apoptotic index and expression of Bcl-2. These results indicate that both letrozole and tamoxifen have marked influences on the pathological features of breast cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. However, the effects of the two agents varied such that the phenotypes of letrozole- and tamoxifen-treated tumours differ markedly. Effects on clinical, pathological and biological endpoints were frequently disconcordant--future studies will therefore require the evaluation of multiple parameters in order to fully assess tumour response.

Weight loss in breast cancer patient management

PURPOSE

To systematically review and summarize evidence relevant to obesity and breast cancer clinical outcome, potential hormonal mediating mechanisms, and the current status of weight loss interventions for chronic disease management.

METHODS

A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted to identify 5,687 citations with key information from 159 references summarized in text and tables. This process included a search for all breast cancer studies exploring associations among survival or recurrence and obesity at diagnosis or weight gain after diagnosis using prospective criteria.

RESULTS

On the basis of observational studies, women with breast cancer who are overweight or gain weight after diagnosis are found to be at greater risk for breast cancer recurrence and death compared with lighter women. Obesity is also associated with hormonal profiles likely to stimulate breast cancer growth. Recently, use of weight loss algorithms proven successful in other clinical settings that incorporate dietary therapy, physical activity, and ongoing behavior therapy have been endorsed by the National Institutes of Health and other health agencies.

CONCLUSION

Although definitive weight loss intervention trials in breast cancer patients remain to be conducted, the current evidence relating increased body weight to adverse breast cancer outcome and the documented favorable effects of weight loss on clinical outcome in other comorbid conditions support consideration of programs for weight loss in breast cancer patients. Recommendations for the clinical care of overweight or obese breast cancer patients are offered.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: breast surgery and hernia repair

Use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgery is still controversial. We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to identify the best way to approach clean surgery. The question is more important for patients undergoing breast surgery. The presence of an infected breast wound delays the beginning of postoperative adjuvant anticancer therapy: there is good evidence to suggest that delayed adjuvant therapy compromises the outcome for patients in terms of both local control and survival. There are several clinical trials that have addressed the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing breast surgery and hernia repair. Platt et al assessed the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in a clinical trial of 1218 patients undergoing clean surgery with an absolute reduction rate of 39% in wound infections. Gupta et al reported no influence on the incidence of infective complications by antibiotic prophylaxis in 357 patients undergoing elective breast surgery. Like breast surgery, use of prophylaxis in hernia repair is not clear: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 619 patients assessed no benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand Lewis et al reported a 75% reduction of infections in low-risk patients when a single dose of cefotaxime was used in clean operations. A particularly interesting point is the use of prosthetic mesh in hernia repair and primary reconstructive surgery in breast surgery. Amland et al reported a significant reduction of the incidence of wound infections in a group of patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery, receiving azithromycin vs placebo (5% vs 20%). In hernia repair we stress the need to prevent wound infections: currently Liechtestein's technique is widely performed all over the world. Mesh infection is an unpleasant event that requires prosthesis removal. The lack of conclusive studies about antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery suggests that a single-dose of cephalosporin at the induction of anesthesia may be prudent. This procedure is certainly inexpensive and safe and, more importantly, probably does not have an impact on antibiotic resistance.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing breast surgery

Some groups of patients undergoing clean surgery benefit from the provision of antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection. Breast surgery may belong to this category because several substantial studies have reported that it is accompanied by an unacceptably high rate of wound infection. However, only two clinical trials have addressed this issue and both produced equivocal results. Resolution of this problem is important because, aside from the usual advantages obtained by preventing such complications, wound infection diminishes the proportion of patients with breast cancer who start adjuvant regimens within an optimum time after surgery.

Identification of long-term survivors in primary breast cancer by dynamic modelling of tumour response

Although clinical response to primary chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer is associated with a survival advantage, it is the degree of pathological response in the breast and ipsilateral axilla that best identifies patients with a good long-term outcome. A mathematical model of the initial response of 39 locally advanced tumours to anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy has been previously shown to predict subsequent clinical tumour size. This model allows for the possibility of primary resistant disease, the presence of which should therefore be associated with a worse outcome. This study reports the application of this model to an additional five patients with locally advanced breast cancer, as well as to 63 patients with operable breast cancer, and confirms the biological reality of the model parameters for these 100 breast cancers treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The tumours that responded to chemotherapy had higher cell-kill (P < 0.0005), lower resistance (P < 0.0001) and slower tumour regrowth (P < 0.002). Furthermore, ER-negative tumours had higher cell-kill (P < 0.05), as compared with ER-positive tumours. All patients with a pathological complete response had zero resistance according to the model. Furthermore, the long-term implication of chemo-resistant disease was demonstrated by survival analysis of these two groups of patients. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, there was a statistically significantly worse survival for the 37 patients with locally advanced breast cancer identified by the model to have more than 8% primary resistant tumour (P < 0.003). The specificity of this putative prognostic indicator was confirmed in the 63 patients presenting with operable disease where, at a median follow-up of 7.7 years, those women with a resistant fraction of greater than 8% had a significantly worse survival (P < 0.05). Application of this model to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy may allow earlier identification of clinically significant resistance and permit intervention with alternative non-cross-resistant therapies such as taxoids.

Seroma Formation after Breast Cancer Surgery: Incidence and Predicting Factors

The pathophysiology of seroma formation has yet to be determined. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to calculate the incidence of postoperative seromas after definitive breast cancer operations utilizing electrocautery dissection. Additionally, we attempted to identify risk factors associated with seroma development and to examine seroma formation in relation to operative procedure. A retrospective review of 252 breast cancer operations was undertaken. Patients were subdivided by operative procedure: modified radical mastectomy (MRM; n = 148), breast preservation with axillary node dissection (n = 64), or MRM with immediate reconstruction (n = 40). Electrocautery was used in development of skin flaps. Seromas developed in 39 of the 252 operations for an incidence of 15.5 per cent. Seroma formation was significantly lower in those patients receiving MRM with immediate reconstruction than in those receiving MRM (2.5% vs 19.6%; P = 0.009) and tended to be lower than for patients receiving breast preservation with axillary node dissection (14.06%; P = 0.052). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 18 patients, of whom 6 developed seromas ( P = 0.030). The incidence of postoperative seromas was low despite the use of electrocautery. An association of postoperative seromas with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was noted. Additionally, it appears that immediate reconstruction may reduce the incidence of postoperative seromas, presumably by filling the dead space in the chest wall.

Concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with skin expanders after mastectomy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) by means of skin expander is currently one of the most widely used methods of breast reconstruction in mastectomized patients. However, given that many breast cancer patients usually receive adjuvant chemotherapy, the adoption of IBR raises new questions concerning possible cumulative toxicity. The present study reports our experience in the use of concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with skin expander after mastectomy for breast cancer and the acute cumulative toxicity of the treatments.

METHODS

We evaluated a consecutive series of 52 breast cancer patients who have received IBR by skin expander after radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy concurrently during skin expansion between 1995 and 1998 (IBR/CT group). We identified two series of control patients treated during the same period: 51 consecutive patients undergoing radical mastectomy and IBR without adjuvant chemotherapy (IBR group) and 63 consecutive patients undergoing radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy without IBR (CT group). For each patient, we evaluated the incidence of surgical complications and chemotherapy's side effects and dose intensity.

RESULTS

The interval between surgery and the start of expander inflation was similar in IBR/CT (range 0-19, median 5 days) and IBR groups (range 0-40, median 5 days) and the timing of inflation was not influenced by chemotherapy. The overall incidence of surgical complications in patients undergoing IBR was low: seroma in eight cases, infection in one, skin necrosis in one, expander rupture in two and erythema in three. There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of complications between the IBR/CT and IBR groups. The dose intensity of chemotherapy was similar between IBR/CT and CT groups, with a median dose intensity of 96% and 95% of the projected dose, respectively. The only statistically significant difference in terms of chemotherapy side effects (p = 0.03) was that stomatitis was more frequent and intense in the CT than in the IBR/CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent treatment with IBR and adjuvant chemotherapy appears feasible and safe, it does not increase acute surgical complications or chemotherapy side effects, and does not require any changes in dose intensity or the timing of inflation.

Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer--10-year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy

Between 1984 and 1990, 94 women presenting to the Edinburgh Breast Unit with operable breast cancer of 4 cm or greater in diameter (T2, T3, N0, N1, M0) were given preoperative systemic therapy. Initially, all women received hormone therapy, with CHOP (cyclophosphamide 1 g m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2) to a maximum of 2 mg and prednisolone 40 mg per day orally for 5 days) chemotherapy being administered to those who failed to respond by 3 months. After April 1987, first-line hormone therapy was only offered to women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-moderate/-rich (> 20 fmol mg(-1) protein) tumours, and CHOP was reserved for those women whose tumours failed to respond to hormone therapy and for those with ER-negative/-poor tumours. Response data have been published previously (Anderson et al, 1991). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in survival between those women given initial hormone therapy and those given chemotherapy, with neither group having yet reached its median survival. The two key factors that predicted for a poor survival were the number of involved axillary nodes after preoperative systemic therapy (P < 0.00001) and a lack of response to preoperative therapy (P < 0.05). These data suggest that many women with ER-moderate/-rich tumours will have a good prognosis after preoperative hormone therapy alone. However, it is possible to identify, by their post-systemic therapy axillary node status, a group of women who still have an appalling prognosis after preoperative chemotherapy or hormone therapy.