Transplantation for diabetes mellitus

Post-Transplant Malignancies following Pancreas Transplantation: Incidence and Implications on Long-Term Outcome from a Single-Center Perspective

Chronic immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of malignancy. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence and effect of post-transplant malignancies (PTMs) following pancreas transplantation. The 348 first pancreas transplants performed between 1985 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Incidences of PTMs, as well as patient and graft survival, were evaluated. Out of 348 patients, 71 (20.4%) developed a PTM. Median time to diagnosis was 130 months. Thirty-six patients (50.7%) developed skin cancers (four patients with melanoma, 32 with NMSCs). Solid organ malignancy occurred in 25 (35.2%), hematologic malignancy in ten patients (14.1%). Affected patients were transplanted earlier [2000 (IQR 1993−2004) vs. 2003 (IQR 1999−2008); p < 0.001]. No differences in induction therapy were seen, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survival. Pancreas transplant recipients with solid organ and hematologic malignancies had a three- and six-fold increased hazard of death compared to those with skin cancers [aHR 3.04 (IQR 1.17–7.91); p = 0.023; aHR 6.07 (IQR 1.87–19.71); p = 0.003]. PTMs affect every fifth patient following pancreas transplantation. Skin cancers are the most common malignancies accounting for 50% of all PTMs. These results underscore the importance of close dermatologic follow-up.

Co-transfection of GK and mhPINS genes into HepG2 cells confers glucose-stimulated insulin secretion

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to construct an 'artificial beta cell' that can exhibit physiologic glucose-stimulated insulin secretion for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Retroviral vector containing the glucokinase (GK) gene and mutated human proinsulin (mhPINS) gene was constructed. HepG2 cells were first infected with recombinant retrovirus carrying the GK and mhPINS genes, then selectively cultured with G418 to obtain the positive clones. GK and mhPINS gene transcription and expression were identified by radioimmunity, Western blot and RT-PCR techniques. Finally, the dose-response effect of glucose on insulin secretion from those HepG2 cells that expressed both GK and mhPINS genes was tested with HepG2 cells that only expressed the mhPINS gene as a control.

RESULTS

HepG2 cells with transferred GK and mhPINS genes were selectively cultured with G418 and the positive clones were obtained in 3 weeks. Four clones with GK and mhPINS gene expression were selected from 20 positive clones by radioimmunity and Western blot. We picked up one clone with a strong GK and mhPINS gene expression and named it clone Beta. In clone Beta, differences in insulin secretion at 0.5 and 0.75 mmol/L glucose concentrations were not significant (P>0.05) and differences in insulin secretion at 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mmol/L glucose concentrations were not significant (P>0.05), while there were significant differences in insulin secretion at other glucose concentrations(P<0.05). The artificial beta cell, clone Beta, obtained a glucose-stimulated insulin secretion with maximal insulin secretion at 1.75-2.00 mmol/L glucose concentrations.

DISCUSSION

An artificial beta cell that exhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion can be constructed successfully.

Islet neogenesis: a potential therapeutic tool in type 1 diabetes

Current therapies for type 1 diabetes, including fastidious blood glucose monitoring and multiple daily insulin injections, are not sufficient to prevent complications of the disease. Though pancreas and possibly islet transplantation can prevent the progression of complications, the scarcity of donor organs limits widespread application of these approaches. Understanding the mechanisms of beta-cell mass expansion as well as the means to exploit these pathways has enabled researchers to develop new strategies to expand and maintain islet cell mass. Potential new therapeutic avenues include ex vivo islet expansion and improved viability of islets prior to implantation, as well as the endogenous expansion of beta-cell mass within the diabetic patient. Islet neogenesis, through stem cell activation and/or transdifferentiation of mature fully differentiated cells, has been proposed as a means of beta-cell mass expansion. Finally, any successful new therapy for type 1 diabetes via beta-cell mass expansion will require prevention of beta-cell death and maintenance of long-term endocrine function.

Causes of limited survival of microencapsulated pancreatic islet grafts

Successful transplantation of pancreatic tissue has been demonstrated to be an efficacious method of restoring glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients. To establish graft acceptance patients require lifelong immunosuppression, which in turn is associated with severe deleterious side effects. Microencapsulation is a technique that enables the transplantation of pancreatic islets in the absence of immunosuppression by protecting the islet tissue through a mechanical barrier. This protection may even allow for the transplantation of animal tissue, which opens the perspective of using animal donors as a means to solve the problem of organ shortage. Microencapsulation is not yet applied in clinical practice, mainly because encapsulated islet graft survival is limited. In the present review we discuss the principal causes of microencapsulated islet graft failure, which are related to a lack of biocompatibility, limited immunoprotective properties, and hypoxia. Next to the causes of encapsulated islet graft failure we discuss possible improvements in the encapsulation technique and additional methods that could prolong encapsulated islet graft survival. Strategies that may well support encapsulated islet grafts include co-encapsulation of islets with Sertoli cells, the genetic modification of islet cells, the creation of an artificial implantation site, and the use of alternative donor sources. We conclude that encapsulation in combination with one or more of these additional strategies may well lead to a simple and safe transplantation therapy as a cure for diabetes.