Unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases treated by intraoperative radiofrequency ablation with or without resection19

Curative-intent treatment of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: A comparison between imaging-guided thermal ablation and surgery

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastases (PM) are the most frequent extra-abdominal metastases from colorectal cancer. Lung resection and imaging-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) are used as curative-intent treatment. We compared the outcomes of patients with PM, treated with resection or ablation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery or IGTA for colorectal PM between April 2011 and November 2020. Surgery was performed for peripheral PM and IGTA for deep-located PM not in contact with major vessels. Patients who had both procedures were excluded. Patients were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, stratified according to number, size, and unilaterality of PM.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourty-six patients were included, 65 (44.5%) underwent surgery and 81 (55.5%) underwent IGTA. After PSM analysis, each group contained 46 patients. IGTA patients had a lower morbidity rate (13.1% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.028) and a shorter length of stay (5.13 vs. 2.63 days, p < 0.001). Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups with 5-year OS of 80% and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 30% (p = 0.657 and p = 0.504, respectively) with similar recurrence patterns.

CONCLUSION

Lung resection and IGTA seem to have similar oncologic outcomes for both OS and PFS. IGTA could be an alternative effective treatment for small PM, whenever technically feasible.

Incidence and Survival in Synchronous and Metachronous Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Although treatment and prognosis of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer are relatively well known, a comparative description of the incidence, epidemiological features, and outcomes of synchronous and metachronous liver metastases is lacking. The difference in prognosis between patients with synchronous and metachronous liver metastases is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate temporal patterns in the incidence and outcomes of synchronous vs metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study used information from a French regional digestive cancer registry accounting for 1 082 000 inhabitants. A total of 26 813 patients with a diagnosis of incident colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 1, 1976, and December 31, 2018, were included. Data were analyzed from February 7 to May 20, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Age-standardized incidence was calculated. Univariate and multivariate net survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 26 813 patients with colorectal cancer (15 032 men [56.1%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [64-81] years), 4546 (17.0%) presented with synchronous liver metastases. The incidence rate of synchronous liver metastases was 6.9 per 100 000 inhabitants in men and 3.4 per 100 000 inhabitants in women, with no significant variation since 2000. The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous liver metastases decreased from 18.6% (95% CI, 14.9%-22.2%) during the 1976 to 1980 period to 10.0% (95% CI, 8.8%-11.2%) during the 2006 to 2011 period. Cancer stage at diagnosis was the strongest risk factor for liver metastases; compared with patients diagnosed with stage II cancer, patients with stage III cancer had a 2-fold increase in risk (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.08-2.82) for up to 5 years. Net survival at 1 year was 41.8% for synchronous liver metastases and 49.9% for metachronous metastases, and net survival at 5 years was 6.2% for synchronous liver metastases and 13.2% for metachronous metastases. Between the first (1976-1980) and last (2011-2016) periods, the adjusted ratio of death after synchronous and metachronous metastases was divided by 2.5 for patients with synchronous status and 3.7 for patients with metachronous status.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the incidence of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases changed little over time, whereas there was a 2-fold decrease in the probability of developing metachronous liver metastases. Survival improved substantially for patients with metachronous liver metastases, whereas improvement was more modest for those with synchronous metastases. The differences observed in the epidemiological features of synchronous and metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer may be useful for the design of future clinical trials.

Oligometastatic Disease in the Liver: The Role of Interventional Oncology

Oligometastatic disease represents a clinically discrete intermediate stage of cancer progression and is an expanding area of research. While surgical metastatectomy has been recognized for decades as an effective treatment option in select patients, options for metastasis-directed therapy have broadened in scope with advancements in the armamentarium of non- and minimally invasive modalities. Recent preclinical studies investigating the immunology surrounding liver metastases demonstrate treatment resistance to immunotherapy in affected patients and show how locoregional therapy has the ability to overcome this resistance. In this paper, we review advancements in our understanding of oligometastatic disease, metastasis-directed therapy, effect of liver metastasis on response to immunotherapy, and the burgeoning role of image-guided interventions in complementing cancer immunotherapy at the exciting crossroads of interventional oncology and immuno-oncology.

Short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for patients with multiple primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a propensity matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (IORFA) is a strategy to eliminate all tumors in patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatectomy + IORFA for multiple unresectable CRLM.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent combined hepatectomy and IORFA for multiple unresectable CRLM (n = 67) or hepatectomy alone (n = 268) for CRLM. Patients were matched in a 1:1 propensity score analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Patients in hepatectomy + IORFA group had a median number of 10 liver lesions. Postoperative morbidity and the rate of major complications was similar between groups (P = 0.362, P = 1.000). The median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and hepatic recurrence free survival (HRFS) was similar between groups (3-year OS: 54.2% versus 60.9%, P = 0.389; 3-year PFS: 7.9% versus 19.6%, P = 0.148; 3-year HRFS: 16.7% versus 31.5%, P = 0.202). Re-hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation was used to treat 47.5% of hepatic recurrences, and the median OS was significantly higher than for patients treated with systemic treatment alone (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining hepatectomy and IORFA could provide comparable survival rates for patients with multiple unresectable CRLM compared to those with resectable CRLM treated with hepatectomy alone.

Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward

Image-guided ablation can provide effective local tumor control in selected patients with CLM. A randomized controlled trial suggested that radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a survival benefit for patients with unresectable CLM, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. For small tumors, ablation with adequate margins can be considered as an alternative to resection. The improvement of ablation technologies can allow the treatment of tumors close to major vascular structures or bile ducts, on which the applicability of thermal ablation modalities is challenging. Several factors affect the outcomes of ablation, including but not limited to tumor size, number, location, minimal ablation margin, RAS mutation status, prior hepatectomy, and extrahepatic disease. Further understanding of the impact of tumor biology and advanced imaging guidance on overall patient outcomes might help to tailor its application, and improve outcomes of image-guided ablation.

Resection vs. ablation for lesions characterized as resectable-ablative within the colorectal liver oligometastases criteria: a propensity score matching from retrospective study

Background

There has been no prospective or retrospective studies reporting the comparison outcome between surgery and ablation for resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation) colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and prognostic difference in patients who underwent R0 resection vs. complete ablation within the resectable-ablative CLOM criteria.

Methods

From January 2008 to May 2018, a total of 2,367 patients diagnosed with colorectal liver metastases were included in this observational study. The metastasis was characterized by only limited to liver with number ≤5, size ≤5 cm, and resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation). The evaluated indications, including liver progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), survival rates, pattern and number of recurrences, and complications, were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and a log-rank test was performed. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of outcomes.

Results

A total of 421 consecutive patients were eligible for this study, with 250 and 171 undergoing R0 resection and complete ablation, respectively. PSM identified 145 patients from each group. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year OS rates in the resection group and the ablation group were 95.8% vs. 95.0%, 69.8% vs. 60.1%, 53.6% vs. 42.5%, and 45.1% vs. 32.9% (p = 0.075), respectively. The median LPFS in the resection group was significantly longer than that in the ablation group (35 months vs. 15 months, p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in LPFS between the two groups when comparing ≤3 cm liver metastases. For liver metastasis >3 cm, the median LPFS in the resection group and ablation group was 11 months and 5 months, respectively (p = 0.001). In terms of high risk of clinical risk score (CRS), the resection group showed longer LPFS than the ablation group (median 18 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.043).

Conclusion

For patients within the CLOM criteria suggesting that liver metastases were resectable as well as ablative, resection could result in longer liver recurrence-free survival than ablation in cases with size >3 cm or high risk of CRS. But for ≤3 cm liver metastases, their treatment efficacies were comparable.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) published in January 2019, and available on the French Society of Gastroenterology website (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

This collaborative work was realized by all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of mCRC. Recommendations are graded in three categories (A, B and C), according to the level of evidence found in the literature, up until December 2018.

RESULTS

The management of metastatic colorectal cancer has become complex because of increasing available medical, radiological and surgical treatments alone or in combination. The therapeutic strategy should be defined before the first-line treatment, mostly depending on the presentation of the disease (resectability of the metastases, symptomatic and/or threatening disease), of the patient's condition (ECOG PS, comorbidities), and tumor biology (RAS, BRAF, MSI). The sequence of targeted therapies also seems to have an impact on the outcome (angiogenesis inhibition beyond progression). Surgical resection of metastases was the only curative intent treatment to date, joined recently by percutaneous tumor ablation tools (radiofrequency, microwave). Localized therapies such as hepatic intra-arterial infusion, radioembolization and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, also have seen their indications specified (liver-dominant disease and resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis). New treatments have been developed in heavily pretreated patients, increasing overall survival and preserving quality of life (regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil). Finally, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy in MSI mCRC.

CONCLUSION

French guidelines for mCRC management are put together to help offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice, as the mCRC therapeutic landscape is complexifying. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed and updated. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary team (MDT).

Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Hepatectomy with or without Radiofrequency Ablation

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing liver resection (LR) with or without radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A systematic search was performed using both medical subject headings and truncated word searches to identify all comparative studies published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A total of 10 studies which included 3900 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. Patients treated by LR gained better OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.82–2.37) and DFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.70–2.15) than those patients treated by LR 1 RFA, after pooling unadjusted HRs from the 10 studies. Five studies provided the data of adjusted HR. The pooled results showed that patients in the LR 1 RFA group had shorter OS (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18–2.32, P = 0.004) but similar DFS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.88) compared with patients in the LR group. Our meta-analysis showed that colorectal liver metastases patients who underwent LR gained better long-term outcomes compared with patients undergoing LR 1 RFA. However, after adjusting confounders, LR 1 RFA achieved comparable DFS with LR alone.

Parenchymal sparing surgery brings treatment of colorectal liver metastases into the precision medicine era

The treatment of advanced colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) follows the biphasic pattern characteristic of oncological surgery. A phase of escalation-the therapeutic aggressiveness-is followed by a phase of de-escalation aimed at decreasing the morbidity, while preserving the gains in survival. From a maximum of three lesions, the rule no longer limits the number, provided the intervention does not cause lethal liver failure. Technically feasible non-anatomical resections, two-stage hepatectomies, portal vein obliteration and so forth, have pushed the boundaries of surgery far. However, the impact and the biology of metastatic processes have been long ignored. Parenchymal sparing surgery (PSS) is a de-escalation strategy that targets only metastasis by minimising the risk of stimulating tumour growth, while enabling iterative interventions. Reducing the loss of healthy parenchyma increases the tolerance of the liver to interval chemotherapy. Technically, PSS could use any type of hepatectomy, providing it is centred on the metastatic load alongside intraoperative ablation. The PSS concept sometimes wrongly comes across as a debate between minor versus major hepatectomies. Hence, we propose a clear definition, both quantitative and qualitative, of what PSS is and what it is not. Conversely, the degree of selectivity of PSS as a percentage of the volume of resected metastases versus the volume of total liver removed has not been stopped to date and should be the subject of prospective studies. Ultimately, the treatment of advanced CRLMs, of which PSS is a part, needs to be personalised by the multidisciplinary team by adapting its response to each new recurrence.

The Role of Liver-Directed Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Purpose of Review

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis is a major clinical problem, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment. We seek to discuss various liver-directed therapy modalities and explore their roles in the evolving realm of treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Recent Findings

Clinical outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases have improved as more patients undergo potentially curative resection and as the armamentarium of systemic treatment and liver-directed therapies continues to expand. Liver-directed therapies have been developed as adjuncts to improve resectability, employed in the adjuvant setting to potentially reduce local recurrence rates, and utilized in the palliative setting with the aim to improve overall survival.

Summary

Ongoing research is expected to validate the role of these evolving therapeutic options, and determine how best to sequence and when to apply these therapies.

Liver Resection or Resection plus Intraoperative Echo-Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Colorectal Metastases: We are Evaluating Their Effect for Cure

This study determines the oncologic outcome of the combined resection and ablation strategy for colorectal liver metastases. Between January 1994 and December 2015, 373 patients underwent surgery for colorectal liver metastases. There were 284 patients who underwent hepatic resection only (Group 1) and 83 hepatic resection plus ablation (Group 2). Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of multiple metastases (100% in Group 2 vs 28.2% in Group 1; P < 0.001) and bilobar involvement (76.5% in Group 2 vs 12.9% in Group 1; P < 0.001) than Group 1 cases. Perioperative mortality was nil in either group, with a higher postoperative complication rate among Group 1 versus Group 2 cases (18 vs 0, respectively). The median follow-up was 90 months (range, 1–180), with a five-year overall survival for Group 1 and Group 2 of 51 per cent and 80 per cent, respectively (P = 0.193). Mean disease-free survival for patients with R0 resection was 55 per cent, 40 per cent, and 37 per cent at one, two, and three years, respectively, and remained steadily higher (at 50%) in those patients treated with resection combined with ablation up to five years (P = 0.069). The only intraoperative ablation failure was for a large lesion (≥5 cm). Our data support the use of intraoperative ablation when complete hepatic resection cannot be achieved.

Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases initially greater than 25 mm but downsized by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased rate of local tumor progression

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valid treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM) smaller than 25 mm and unsuitable for surgical resection. Tumor size is predictive for local tumor progression (LTP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether RFA is indicated for lesions >25 mm at presentation but <25 mm after chemotherapy.

METHOD

Patients who underwent RFA for CRLM after chemotherapy (January 2004-December 2012) were reviewed. Metastases were classified according to their size. Group 1: ≤25 mm before and after chemotherapy. Group 2A: >25 mm before but ≤25 mm after chemotherapy. Group 2B: >25 mm before and after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

133 CRLM were ablated in 83 patients (median follow-up 56 months). At 1-year, the LTP rate was higher in group 2A than in group 1 (32% vs. 16%, p ≤ 0.001). The highest rate of 1-year LTP was 64% in group 2B. Time to LTP (TLTP) was shorter in group 2A than in group 1 (HR: 2.89; 95% CI [1.04-8.01]; p = 0.004). Following multivariate analysis, the group type was the only predictive factor for TLTP (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is not the optimal treatment for CRLM > 25 mm at presentation.

Radiofrequency Ablation to Improve Survival After Conversion Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

INTRODUCTION

Systemic chemotherapy is able to convert colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that are initially unsuitable for local treatment into locally treatable disease. Surgical resection further improves survival in these patients. Our aim was to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and morbidity for patients with CRLM treated with RFA following effective downstaging by chemotherapy, and to identify factors associated with recurrence and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Included patients had liver-dominant CRLM initially unsuitable for local treatment but eligible for RFA or RFA with resection after downstaging by systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic regimens consisted predominantly of CapOx, with or without bevacizumab. Follow-up was conducted with PET-CT or thoraco-pelvic CT.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients had a total of 325 CRLM (median = 7). Following chemotherapy, 183 lesions were still visible on CT (median = 3). Twenty-six patients were treated with RFA combined with resection. During surgery, 309 CRLM were retrieved on intraoperative ultrasound (median = 5). Median survival was 49 months and was associated with extrahepatic disease at time of presentation and recurrences after treatment. Estimated cumulative survival at 1, 3 and 4 years was 90, 63 and 45 %, respectively. Median DFS was 6 months. Twelve patients remained free of recurrence after a mean follow-up of 32.6 months.

CONCLUSION

RFA of CRLM after conversion chemotherapy provides potential local control and a good overall survival. To prevent undertreatment, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team in follow-up imaging and assessment of local treatment possibilities after palliative chemotherapy for liver-dominant CRLM should always be considered.

Parenchymal sparing surgery for colorectal liver metastases: The need for a common definition

BACKGROUND

The definition of parenchymal sparing surgery (PSS) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) diverges requiring a clarification of the concept.

METHOD

A consecutive series of patients were treated by PSS for their CRLMs, either by resection or intra-operative ablation (IOA), whenever possible a one-stage surgery and minimal usage of portal vein embolization. Post-operative complications were the primary endpoint with a special focus on post-operative liver failure.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-seven patients underwent a PSS out of which 328 patients received a median of 9 pre-operative cycles of chemotherapy. One hundred and twenty-eight patients had a major resection, combined with IOA in 137 patients and IOA alone in 50 cases. The 5yr-overall survival was 50.3%. There was no difference in post-operative complications between minor and major resections, validating our PSS definition based on the Tumor burden/Healthy liver ratio and not just the retrieved volume.

CONCLUSIONS

PSS is defined as a high ratio of tumoral burden per specimen retrieved while favoring one-stage surgery approach. Our series, using combined resections and IOAs, matches this definition well. Furthermore, complications were correlated neither to chemotherapy nor to liver-induced toxicities, contrary to extended hepatectomies.

Non-response to preoperative chemotherapy is a contraindication to hepatectomy plus radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases

The long-term outcome of 228 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy ± RFA were retrospectively analyzed. Stratified by chemotherapy response, patients were divided into responding (n=129) and non-responding groups (n=99). Patients who underwent hepatectomy-RFA had a greater number of metastases (median of 4 vs. 2, p=0.000), a higher incidence of bilobar involvement (66.7% vs. 49.1%, p=0.014) and longer chemotherapy cycles (median of 6 vs. 4, p=0.000). In the responding group, the median overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) of hepatectomy-RFA and the hepatectomy alone subgroups were comparable (38.6 months vs. 43.2 months, p=0.824; 8.2 months vs. 11.4 months, p=0.623). In the non-responding group, the median OS and RFS of patients treated with hepatectomy-RFA were significantly shorter (18.5 months vs. 34.2 months, p=0.000; 5.1 months vs. 5.9 months, p=0.002). RFA was identified as the unfavorable independent factor for both OS (HR=3.60, 95%CI=1.81-7.16, p=0.039) and RFS (HR=1.70, 95%CI=1.00-2.86, p=0.048) in non-responsive patients. Local recurrence rate after hepatectomy-RFA was higher in the non-responding group (48.1% vs. 23.6%, p=0.018). Non-response to preoperative chemotherapy may be a contraindication to hepatectomy-RFA in patients with CRLM.

New Developments in Interventional Oncology: Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Although hepatic excision is the first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), few patients are candidates. Locoregional therapy (LRT) encompasses minimally invasive techniques practiced by interventional radiology. These include ablative treatments (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryosurgical ablation) and transcatheter intra-arterial therapy (hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, transarterial "bland" embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization with yttrium 90). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends LRT for unresectable CRLM refractory to chemotherapy. The following is a review of LRT in CRLM, including salient features, advantages, limitations, current roles, and future considerations.

Liver-directed therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is a significant global health issue with over 1 million cases diagnosed annually throughout the world. 15% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will have liver metastases and 60% will develop liver metastases if they have metastatic disease. Oligometastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver represents an intermediate state in the evolution of metastatic capacity that opens the opportunity for local interventions. Areas covered: The literature supports long-term survival if patients undergo liver resection of colorectal metastases. This article reviews the liver-directed therapeutic strategies available for the management of metastatic liver disease including hepatic arterial infusion therapy, radiofrequency ablation, radiation therapy and transarterial chemoembolization. Expert commentary: Great advances have been made with the use of liver directed therapies. In the USA using hepatic arterial infusions with FUDR and Decadron along with systemic therapy, 5 year survivals after liver resection have improved. In Europe with the use of HAI of Oxaliplatin, more patients have been able to get to resection and have obtained higher survival rates, even in second line therapy. New advances in ablative therapy have improved results to get all disease treated at resection for the treatment of reccurrence.

Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review

The use of liver transplantation (LT) for liver metastases attempted in the early 1990's was associated with poor perioperative outcomes and unacceptably low overall survival. Recently, there has been renewed interest in LT as a treatment option for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in countries where organ supply is high. To date, no meticulous analysis about the efficacy, safety and outcomes of LT in CLM patients has been published. We present the first systematic review on the subject.

Current status and future perspectives on treatment of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (Review)

Liver metastasis is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis. Approximately half of all colorectal cancer patients will develop liver metastases. Although radical surgery is the standard treatment modality, only 10-20% of patients are deemed eligible for resection. Despite advances in survival with chemotherapy, surgical resection is still considered the only curative option for patients with liver metastases. Much effort has been expended to address patients with metastatic liver disease. The majority of evidence stated a significant survival benefit with surgical resection to reach an overall 5-year survival rate of 35-55% after hepatic resection. However, still majority of patients will experience disease recurrence even after a successful resection. In this review, we describe current status and controversies related to treatment options for CRC liver metastases and its potential for enhancing oncologic outcomes and improving quality of life.

Liver Resection After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90 is Safe and Feasible: A Bi-institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment with yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres has emerged as a viable liver-directed therapy for patients with unresectable tumors and those outside transplantation criteria. A select number of patients demonstrate a favorable response and become candidates for surgical resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Y90 microspheres at two institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent liver resection were included in the study. The data gathered included demographics, tumor characteristics, response to Y90, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and survival.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 12 patients. The diagnoses included metastatic disease from colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 6), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1), and ocular melanoma (n = 1) in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4). The median time from liver disease diagnosis to Y90 treatment was 5.5 months (range 2-92 months). The median time from Y90 treatment to surgery was 9.5 months (range 3-20 months). The surgical approach included right hepatectomy (n = 3), extended right hepatectomy (n = 5), extended left hepatectomy (n = 1), segmentectomy with ablation (n = 2), and segmentectomy with isolated liver perfusion (n = 1). The hospital stay was 7 days (range 4-31 days), and 67% of the patients were discharged home. The readmission rate was 42%. The 90-day morbidity and mortality rates were respectively 42 and 8%. At this writing, the median overall survival has not been reached at 25 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection after Y90 SIRT is a challenging surgical procedure with high rates of perioperative morbidity and hospital readmission. However, for properly selected patients, potential exists for extending disease-free and overall survival in the current era of multimodal therapy for malignant liver disease.

Local Ablation for Solid Tumor Liver Metastases: Techniques and Treatment Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for liver metastases from solid tumors, such as colon cancer, breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, and sarcomas, have expanded in recent years and now include nonresection methods.

METHODS

The literature focused on the treatment of liver metastases was reviewed for technique, perioperative, and long-term outcomes specifically related to local ablation techniques for liver metastases.

RESULTS

Ablation modalities have become popular as therapies for patients who are not appropriate candidates for surgical resection. Use of these techniques, alone or in combination with other liver-directed therapies (and often systemic therapy), has extended the rate of survival for patients with liver metastases and, at times, offers nearly equivalent disease-free survival rates to surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although surgical resection remains the optimal treatment for liver metastasis, local options, including microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation, can offer similar long-term local control in appropriately selected patients.

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis in eleven questions and answers

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the most frequent indication for liver resection in many centers. Recent improvements in oncology, surgery, interventional radiology, pathology and anesthesiology allow curative treatment in a larger proportion of patients with CRLM. Areas covered: We illustrate the various aspects of the management of CRLM through 11 questions that summarize the topic, from the current obtained survival to future perspectives such as transplantation. The limits of a curative treatment are also presented from different angles, such as the benefits of pathology, the surgical options for extreme resections, the available chemotherapies and their efficacy, or the non-surgical ablative treatments. Expert commentary: Given the increasing therapeutic possibilities, we strengthen the importance to analyze the situation of each patient with CRLM in a dedicated multidisciplinary team, in order to offer the best individualized treatment combination.

Single-stage resection and microwave ablation for bilobar colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing liver resection combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for bilobar colorectal metastasis may have similar overall survival to patients who undergo two-stage hepatectomy, but with less morbidity.

METHODS

This was a multi-institutional evaluation of patients who underwent MWA between 2003 and 2012. Morbidity (90-day) and mortality were compared between patients who had MWA alone and those who underwent combined resection and MWA (CRA). Mortality and overall survival after CRA were compared with published data on two-stage resections.

RESULTS

Some 201 patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastasis treated with MWA from four high-volume institutions were evaluated (100 MWA alone, 101 CRA). Patients who had MWA alone were older, but the groups were otherwise well matched demographically. The tumour burden was higher in the CRA group (mean number of lesions 3·9 versus 2·2; P = 0·003). Overall (31·7 versus 15·0 per cent; P = 0·006) and high-grade (13·9 versus 5·0 per cent; P = 0·030) complication rates were higher in the CRA group. Median overall survival was slightly shorter in the CRA group (38·4 versus 42·2 months; P = 0·132) but disease-free survival was similar (10·1 versus 9·3 months; P = 0·525). The morbidity and mortality of CRA compared favourably with rates in the existing literature on two-stage resection, and survival data were similar.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage hepatectomy and MWA resulted in survival similar to that following two-stage hepatectomy, with less overall morbidity.

Radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection of liver metastases from uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

The resection of liver metastasis from uveal melanoma (LMUM) remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver metastases alone or in combination with surgical liver resection.

METHODS

A total of 72 patients with LMUM were evaluated in this study. Of these, 57 patients underwent surgical resection (S) while 15 patients had RFA ± S. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated in terms of recurrence and survival using Chi-square and log-rank tests, respectively.

RESULTS

We studied 22 metastases treated by RFA. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of median age of onset, synchronous nature of the metastases, time from primary tumour treatment to liver metastasis, diameter of the largest metastasis, presence of liver miliary disease, and the type of liver resection. There was a statistically lower number of liver metastases and more bilobar metastases in the RFA group than in the S group. The median overall survival after liver surgery was 27 months in group S and 28 months in the RFA group ± S. The median disease-free survival was 10 months in group S and 7 months in the RFA group ± S. There were no statistically significant differences in the median overall survival and disease-free survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this retrospective analysis show that RFA can be used to treat liver metastases to spare the hepatic parenchyma. RFA ± liver surgery and liver surgery alone demonstrate similar survival times.

Minimal invasive treatments for liver malignancies

Minimal invasive therapies have proved useful in the management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. The most relevant aspects of all these therapies are their minimal toxicity profiles and highly effective tumor responses without affecting the normal hepatic parenchyma. These unique characteristics coupled with their minimally invasive nature provide an attractive therapeutic option for patients who previously may have had few alternatives. Combination of these therapies might extend indications to bring curative treatment to a wider selected population. The results of various ongoing combination trials of intraarterial therapies with targeted therapies are awaited to further improve survival in this patient group. This review focuses on the application of ablative and intra-arterial therapies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic colorectal metastasis.

Associating portal embolization and artery ligation to induce rapid liver regeneration in staged hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Insufficient volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is a major cause of unresectability in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel associating portal embolization and artery ligation (APEAL) technique before extended right hepatectomy during a two-stage procedure for CLM.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone extended right hepatectomy during two-stage surgery for CLM between 2012 and 2014 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database. In the first stage, right portal vein embolization, partial right hepatic artery ligation and devascularization of segment IVb along the round ligament without parenchymal transection were associated with clearance of the FLR and/or primary tumour resection. Liver volumetry was performed using OsiriX software on postoperative day (POD) 7 and 30.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent the APEAL procedure. During the first stage, APEAL was combined with colorectal resection in seven patients. The median (range) interval between the two stages was 45 (31-71) days. The FLR volume increased from 327 (214-537) cm(3) before surgery to 590 (508-1072) cm(3) on POD 7 and 701 (512-1018) cm(3) on POD 30. This corresponded to a FLR regeneration rate of 104 (42-185) and 134 (53-171) per cent respectively. There were no deaths. The overall morbidity rate was 60 per cent (6 of 10) after each procedure, with severe morbidity occurring in two and three of ten patients after the first and second procedures respectively.

CONCLUSION

APEAL induces fast, safe, reproducible and effective FLR growth when an extended right hepatectomy is scheduled in patients with multiple bilobar CLM.

First clinical experience of intra-operative high intensity focused ultrasound in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a phase I-IIa study

Background

Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but only 10–20% of patients are eligible. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) technology is of proven value in several indications, notably prostate cancer. Its intra-operative use in patients with CLM has not previously been studied. Preclinical work suggested the safety and feasibility of a new HIFU device capable of ablating volumes of up to 2cm x 2cm in a few seconds.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, single-centre phase I-IIa trial. HIFU was delivered immediately before scheduled hepatectomy. To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of rapidly ablating liver parenchyma, ablations were performed on healthy tissue within the areas scheduled for resection.

Results

In total, 30 ablations were carried out in 15 patients. These ablations were all generated within 40 seconds and on average measured 27.5mm x 21.0mm. The phase I study (n = 6) showed that use of the HIFU device was feasible and safe and did not damage neighbouring tissue. The phase IIa study (n = 9) showed both that the area of ablation could be precisely targeted on a previously implanted metallic mark (used to represent a major anatomical structure) and that ablations could be undertaken deliberately to avoid such a mark. Ablations were achieved with a precision of 1–2 mm.

Conclusion

HIFU was feasible, safe and effective in ablating areas of liver scheduled for resection. The next stage is a phase IIb study which will attempt ablation of small metastases with a 5 mm margin, again prior to planned resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT01489787

Outcomes of microwave ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases: a single center experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastases continues to evolve to optimize oncologic outcomes while maximizing parenchymal preservation. Long-term data after intraoperative microwave ablation are limited. This study investigates outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients who underwent intraoperative microwave ablation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 33 patients who underwent intraoperative microwave ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases from 2009 to 2013 at our institution was performed. Perioperative and long-term data were reviewed to determine outcomes and patterns of recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 49 tumors were treated, ranging 0.5-5.5 cm in size. Median Clavien-Dindo classification was one. Median follow-up was 531 days, with 13 (39.4%) patients presenting with a recurrence. Median time to first recurrence was 364 days. In those patients, 1 (7.8%) presented with an isolated local recurrence in the liver. Only 1 of 7 ablated tumors greater than 3 cm recurred (14.3%). Overall survival was 35.2% at 4 years, with a 19.3% disease-free survival at 3.5 years. No perioperative variables predicted systemic or local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative microwave ablation is a safe and effective modality for use in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases in tumors as large as 5.5 cm in size.

Combined ablation and resection (CARe) as an effective parenchymal sparing treatment for extensive colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Combined intra-operative ablation and resection (CARe) is proposed to treat extensive colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This multicenter study was conducted to evaluate overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), hepatic recurrence-free survival (HRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS), to identify factors associated with survival, and to report complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four centers combined retropectively their clinical experiences regarding CLM treated by CARe. CLM characteristics, pre- and post-operative chemotherapy regimens, surgical procedures, complications and survivals were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 288 patients who received CARe, 210 (73%) had synchronous and 255 (88%) had bilateral CLM. Twenty-two patients (8%) had extrahepatic disease. Median follow-up was 3.17 years (95%CI 2.83-4.08). Median OS was 3.33 years (95%CI 3.08-4.17) and 5-year OS was 37% (95%CI 29-45). One- and 5-year LRFS from ablated lesions were 87.9% (95%CI 83.3-91.2) and 78.0% (95%CI 71-83), respectively. Median HRFS and PFS were 14 months (95%CI 11-18) and 9 months (95%CI 8-11), respectively. One hundred patients experienced complications: 29 grade I, 68 grade II-III-IV, and three deaths. In the multivariate models adjusted for center, the occurrence of complications was confirmed as a major independent factor associated with 3-year OS (HR 1.80; P = 0.008). Five-year OS was 25.6% (95%CI 14.9-37.6) for patients with complications and 45% (95%CI 33.3-53.4) for patients without.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent strategies facing advanced CLM include non-anatomic resections, portal-induced hypertrophy of the future remnant liver and aggressive medical preoperative treatments. CARe has the qualities of an approach that allows effective tumor clearance while maintaining good tolerance for the patient.

Patterns of complications following intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (IRFA) is added to surgery to obtain hepatic clearance of liver metastases. Complications occurring in IRFA should differ from those associated with wedge or anatomic liver resection.

METHODS

Patients with liver metastases treated with IRFA from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively analysed. Postoperative outcomes are reported according to the Clavien-Dindo system of classification.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients underwent 173 procedures for 430 metastases. Of these, 97 procedures involved IRFA plus liver resection and 76 involved IRFA only. The median number of lesions treated by IRFA was two (range: 1-11). A total of 123 (71.1%) procedures were carried out in patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy. The mortality rate was 1.2%. Thirty (39.5%) IRFA-only patients and 45 (46.4%) IRFA-plus-resection patients presented complications. Immediate complications (n = 4) were associated with IRFA plus resection. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, previous abdominal surgery or hepatic resection, body mass index, number of IRFA procedures, portal pedicle clamping, total vascular exclusion and preoperative chemotherapy were not associated with a greater number of complications of Grade III or higher severity. Length of surgery >4 h [odds ratio (OR) 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.3; P < 0.05] and an associated contaminating procedure (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.53-9.06; P < 0.005) led to a greater frequency of complications of Grade III or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and morbidity after IRFA, with or without resection, are low. Nevertheless, long interventions and concurrent bowel operations increase the risk for septic complications.

Outcomes of extended versus limited indications for patients undergoing a liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Currently, resection criteria for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) are only limited by remnant liver function. Morbidity and survival after a partial hepatectomy with limited or extended indication criteria were compared.

METHODS/DESIGN

Between 1991 and 2010, patients undergoing a liver resection for CRCLM with limited (n = 169) or extended indication criteria (n = 129) were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected single-centre database. Limited indication criteria were defined as less than three unilateral, not centrally located liver metastases in the absence of extra hepatic metastases. The extended criteria were only limited by predicted remnant liver volume and patients fitness. Data on co-morbidity, resection margin, short- and long-term morbidity, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with limited indications had less major complications (19.5% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.01), longer overall survival of 68.8 months [confidence interval (CI) 46.5-91.1] vs. 41.4 months (CI 33.4-49.0, P ≤ 0.001) and longer median DFS of 22.0 months [confidence interval (CI) 15.8-28.2] vs 10.2 months (CI 8.4-11.9, P < 0.001) compared with the extended indication group. Cure rates, defined as 10-year DFS, were 35.5% and 15.8%, respectively. Fewer patients in the extended indication group underwent an R0 resection (92.9% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.001). Only 17% of all R1 resected patients had recurrences at the transection plane.

CONCLUSION

A partial hepatectomy for CRCLM with extended indications seems justified but is associated with higher complication rates, earlier recurrence and lower overall survival compared with limited indications. However, the median 5-year survival was substantial and a cure was achieved in 15.8% of patients.

[Colorectal liver metastases: history, sciences and clinical practices]

Colorectal liver metastasis is one of the best-known clinical models of multidisciplinary approach. Chemotherapy, targeted therapies, surgery and interventional radiology permitted to obtain up to 40 months of survival in palliative intent for liver metastases only and between 40 to 50% of overall survival in curative intent. Genetic, epigenetic, cellular and tissular processes are more and more well described but attempts to link biological knowledge to clinical practice are still faint. The cut-off between curative and palliative intents is progressively pushed away but consequently, its signification is less clear. Maybe an additional intermediary new concept should be added, the metastatic disease chronicisation? Evaluating the patient benefice is difficult and should stand on progression free survival as surrogate marker.

Current management of colorectal liver metastases

SUMMARY 

Colorectal cancer is common worldwide and is predicted to become more so in the coming years. The liver is the most common site of metastasis and management is increasingly complex. A multidisciplinary team approach to management is essential, and is associated with better outcomes. Patients with irresectable liver metastases can still benefit from the involvement of a liver specialist, as high secondary resection rates can be achieved with combination chemotherapy, incorporating novel biological therapies and liver-directed local and locoregional treatments. The application of an enhanced recovery model to perioperative care, alongside improvements in the assessment of patient fitness for surgery, should help to mitigate the challenges presented by an older population with increased comorbidity undergoing increasingly complex treatment.

Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases

The management of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (HMCRC) is multimodal including chemotherapy, surgical resection, radiation therapy, and focused destruction technologies. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most commonly used focused destruction technology. It represents a therapeutic option that may be potentially curative in cases where surgical excision is contra-indicated. It also increases the number of candidates for surgical resection among patients whose liver metastases were initially deemed unresectable. This article explains the techniques, indications, and results of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Incidence and treatment of local site recurrences following RFA of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who are ineligible for curative surgery are potential candidates for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Although RFA has emerged as a well accepted and documented treatment modality, there are still some reservations because of initially high rates of local site recurrences (LSR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate LSR levels following RFA treatment, with a specific focus on re-treatment and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients ineligible for curative resection of CRLM and undergoing RFA alone or in combination with resection were prospectively included from July 2000 to December 2010 and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with untreatable extrahepatic disease were excluded. FDG PET-CT was conducted at 3-6 month intervals after RFA. Patients with LSR were evaluated for re-treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were treated with RFA, which was combined with resection in 64 patients. A total of 290 lesions were ablated, with a mean number of 2.19 per patient and a mean size of 2.2 cm. Median survival was 41 months, with a 3- and 5-year survival of, respectively, 60 and 30.8 %. Following initial RFA, 39 patients developed an LSR in 40 ablated lesions, and local recurrence was strongly related to lesion size. Re-treatment could be performed in 26/39 patients, of whom eight remained disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation can be applied to CRLM of less than 3 cm with curative intent. In the absence of extensive intrahepatic or extrahepatic disease, renewed treatment of local recurrences should be considered and is often successful.

Limits of colorectal liver metastases resectability: how and why to overcome them? For progress in cancer research

Offering surgery is to date the best case scenario for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Few oncological topics have progressed as much as the treatment of CRLM. New surgical techniques, conversion therapies, and imaging allow us to pursue the ultimate limit for surgery of CLM before compromising patient benefits. Pushing the limits of surgery involves pushing the limits of conversion therapies too, increasingly taking risks in the surgical process. Finally, toxicities add up and the patient benefit could disappear. The apparent paradox of efficiency and toxicity might be addressed by separating the two treatment targets: (1) The metastatic burden for which a clear escalation in medical and surgical aggressiveness is still required. (2) The healthy parenchyma which should be preserved as much as possible and for which a clear de-escalation is anticipated. A new strategy exists that integrates both fundamental endpoints in the battle against CLM.

Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: a European perspective

The treatment of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver is increasingly complex as a result of changes in the patient population, advances in preoperative staging, changing definitions of resectability, advances in surgical technique and the expanding chemotherapeutic armamentarium. Management of these patients within a multidisciplinary team is increasingly important and associated with better outcomes. In patients with irresectable hepatic metastases, high secondary resection rates can be achieved with multiagent chemotherapy when managed in conjunction with a liver specialist. Perioperative mortality rates are reducing but morbidity remains high, and enhanced recovery could help reduce morbidity. Despite the advancing age and comorbidity of the patient population, multimodal management is likely to lead to further improvements in perioperative and long-term outcomes.

Liver metastases in close contact to hepatic veins ablated under vascular exclusion

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases (LM) in close contact to hepatic veins (HV) are a frequent cause of unresectability. Reconstruction of hepatic veins is technically difficult and outcomes are poor. Intra-operative radiofrequency ablation (IRFA) with vascular exclusion (VE) may be a useful approach.

METHODS

Out of 358 patients operated for LM, 22 with LM close to a HV treated by IRFA under VE with at least one year of follow-up were included in this retrospective study. Technical success was evaluated at four months by CT scan of the ablated lesion. Complications; local, hepatic and extra-hepatic recurrence rates, and overall survival are reported.

RESULTS

The median number of metastases was 4.5 [range: 1-12]. Seventeen patients had bilateral metastases. The median size of ablated lesions was 2 cm [range: 1-5.5]. Seven complications occurred (1 Grade 1, 2 Grade 3b and 4 Grade IVa), with no mortality. No recurrence of ablated lesions was detected at four months or during follow-up. Seventeen patients had new or extra-hepatic lesions. Median overall survival for colorectal patients was 40 months 95%CI[17.5-not reached].

CONCLUSIONS

IRFA plus VE for LM in close contact to a HV is a novel approach, appearing to be a safe and effective technique which can extend the applications of liver metastases surgery.

Microwave ablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Ablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases has been suggested as a potential method of improving survival if complete surgical resection is not possible. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of surgical microwave ablation (MWA) with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was reviewed. Data was extracted for all patients treated with open MWA with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases. Endpoints included postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality, local treatment failure, disease free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients with technically irresectable disease were treated with MWA; 28 underwent combined MWA and resection, whilst 15 underwent MWA as the sole treatment modality. Overall post-operative morbidity was 35%, 30-day postoperative mortality 2%. At a median follow-up of 15 months, local treatment failure was observed in 4% of ablated lesions. 3-year OS was 36% for MWA group, compared to 45% for the combined ablate/resect group with 3-year DFS of 32% and 8% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Microwave ablation with or without resection is a safe and effective method of achieving local disease control. Ablation with or without resection is associated with good long-term outcomes, and may be a suitable treatment option for small non-resectable colorectal liver metastases.

[The surgeon and the metastatic disease]

For a long time, metastatic disease was a prohibited zone for surgeons locked into their roles in controlling primary non-disseminated tumours. However, this has changed at the end of the 20th century with the apparition of effective chemotherapies and targeted therapies. Since then, surgeons have been able to treat hepatic, pulmonary, peritoneal and brain metastases. The more chemotherapy progresses and controls disease, the more surgeons can operate on residual disease. With this final surgery acting on the defined perimeter of systemic treatment efficacy, it appears to offer gains in progression-free survival. Gains in overall survival have not yet been demonstrated. Further, new technologies should enable surgeons to reduce the lower limits of their fields of action, increasing their therapeutic perimeters. Metastatic disease constitutes a unique model of therapeutic synergy that can be accredited to multidisciplinary strategy.