1
|
Gilbert TM, Randle L, Quinn M, McGreevy O, O'leary L, Young R, Diaz-Neito R, Jones RP, Greenhalf B, Goldring C, Fenwick S, Malik H, Palmer DH. Molecular biology of cholangiocarcinoma and its implications for targeted therapy in patient management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024:108352. [PMID: 38653586 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains a devastating malignancy and a significant challenge to treat. The majority of CCA patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, making the disease incurable in most cases. The advent of high-throughput genetic sequencing has significantly improved our understanding of the molecular biology underpinning cancer. The identification of 'druggable' genetic aberrations and the development of novel targeted therapies against them is opening up new treatment strategies. Currently, 3 targeted therapies are approved for use in CCA; Ivosidenib in patients with IDH1 mutations and Infigratinib/Pemigatinib in those with FGFR2 fusions. As our understanding of the biology underpinning CCA continues to improve it is highly likely that additional targeted therapies will become available in the near future. This is important, as it is thought up to 40 % of CCA patients harbour a potentially actionable mutation. In this review we provide an overview of the molecular pathogenesis of CCA and highlight currently available and potential future targeted treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Gilbert
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - L Randle
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Quinn
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - O McGreevy
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - L O'leary
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Young
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Diaz-Neito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - R P Jones
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - B Greenhalf
- Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicines Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - C Goldring
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems Integrative and Molecular Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - S Fenwick
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - H Malik
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Palmer
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicines Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alkhatib O, Miles T, Jones RP, Mair R, Palmer R, Winter H, McDermott FD. Current and future genomic applications for surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:321-328. [PMID: 38555869 PMCID: PMC10981988 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Genomics is a crucial part of managing surgical disease. This review focuses on some of the genomic advances that are available now and looks to the future of their application in surgical practice. Whole-genome sequencing enables unbiased coverage across the entire human genome of approximately three billion base pairs. Newer technologies, such as those that permit long-read sequence analysis, provide additional information in longer phased fragment and base pair epigenomic (methylomic) data. Whole-genome sequencing is currently available in England for cancers in children, teenagers and young adults, central nervous system tumours, sarcoma and haematological malignancies. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), immunotherapy and pharmacogenomics have emerged as groundbreaking approaches in the field of cancer treatment. These are now revolutionising the way oncologists and surgeons approach curative cancer surgery. Cancer vaccines offer an innovative approach to reducing recurrence after surgery by priming the immune system to trigger an immune response. The Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad project facilitates cancer vaccine studies in England. The BNT122-01 trial is recruiting patients with ctDNA-positive high-risk colorectal cancer after surgery to assess the impact of cancer vaccines. The evolving landscape of cancer treatment demands a dynamic and integrated approach from the surgical multidisciplinary team. Immunotherapy, ctDNA, pharmacogenomics, vaccines, mainstreaming and whole-genome sequencing are just some of the innovations that have the potential to redefine the standards of care. The continued exploration of these innovative diagnostics and therapies, the genomic pathway evolution and their application in diverse cancer types highlights the transformative impact of precision medicine in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Alkhatib
- Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - T Miles
- Southwest Genomics Medicine Service Alliance, UK
| | | | | | | | - H Winter
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Astuti Y, Raymant M, Quaranta V, Clarke K, Abudula M, Smith O, Bellomo G, Chandran-Gorner V, Nourse C, Halloran C, Ghaneh P, Palmer D, Jones RP, Campbell F, Pollard JW, Morton JP, Mielgo A, Schmid MC. Author Correction: Efferocytosis reprograms the tumor microenvironment to promote pancreatic cancer liver metastasis. Nat Cancer 2024:10.1038/s43018-024-00751-y. [PMID: 38472300 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00751-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliana Astuti
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Meirion Raymant
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Valeria Quaranta
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kim Clarke
- Computational Biology Facility, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maidinaimu Abudula
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Olivia Smith
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gaia Bellomo
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Craig Nourse
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paula Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel Palmer
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jennifer P Morton
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ainhoa Mielgo
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael C Schmid
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nzenwa IC, Pathak S, Knight SR, Mowbray NG, O’Reilly D, Jones RP. Postoperative surveillance after surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: a cross-sectional study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:213-218. [PMID: 37218655 PMCID: PMC10904262 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are associated with a high recurrence rate after surgery. There is paucity of high-quality evidence regarding the nature and overall benefit of surveillance after hepatectomy for CRLM. As part of a broader programme of research, this study aimed to assess current strategies for surveillance after liver resection for CRLM and outline surgeons' opinions regarding the benefit of postoperative surveillance. METHODS An online survey was sent to clinicians performing surgery for CRLM at tertiary hepatobiliary centres in the UK. RESULTS There were responses from a total of 23 centres (88% response rate); 15/23 centres used standardised surveillance protocols for all patients. Most centres followed patients up at six months, but there is variation in postoperative surveillance at 3, 9, 18 and beyond 60 months. Patient comorbidities, indeterminate findings on imaging, margin status and assessment of recurrence risk were identified as the major factors influencing personalised surveillance strategies. There was clear clinician equipoise regarding the costs and benefits of surveillance. CONCLUSION There is heterogeneity in postoperative follow-up for CRLM in the UK. High-quality prospective studies and randomised trials are necessary to elucidate the value of postoperative surveillance and identify optimal follow-up strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Pathak
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | | - D O’Reilly
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - RP Jones
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Astuti Y, Raymant M, Quaranta V, Clarke K, Abudula M, Smith O, Bellomo G, Chandran-Gorner V, Nourse C, Halloran C, Ghaneh P, Palmer D, Jones RP, Campbell F, Pollard JW, Morton JP, Mielgo A, Schmid MC. Efferocytosis reprograms the tumor microenvironment to promote pancreatic cancer liver metastasis. Nat Cancer 2024:10.1038/s43018-024-00731-2. [PMID: 38355776 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00731-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly metastatic disease and macrophages support liver metastases. Efferocytosis, or engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages, is an essential process in tissue homeostasis and wound healing, but its role in metastasis is less well understood. Here, we found that the colonization of the hepatic metastatic site is accompanied by low-grade tissue injury and that efferocytosis-mediated clearance of parenchymal dead cells promotes macrophage reprogramming and liver metastasis. Mechanistically, progranulin expression in macrophages is necessary for efficient efferocytosis by controlling lysosomal acidification via cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and the degradation of lysosomal cargo, resulting in LXRα/RXRα-mediated macrophage conversion and upregulation of arginase 1. Pharmacological blockade of efferocytosis or macrophage-specific genetic depletion of progranulin impairs macrophage conversion, improves CD8+ T cell functions, and reduces liver metastasis. Our findings reveal how hard-wired functions of macrophages in tissue repair contribute to liver metastasis and identify potential targets for prevention of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliana Astuti
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Meirion Raymant
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Valeria Quaranta
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kim Clarke
- Computational Biology Facility, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maidinaimu Abudula
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Olivia Smith
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gaia Bellomo
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Craig Nourse
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paula Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel Palmer
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jennifer P Morton
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ainhoa Mielgo
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael C Schmid
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones A, Findlay A, Knight SR, Rees J, O'Reilly D, Jones RP, Pathak S. Follow up after surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107103. [PMID: 37890234 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recurrence post hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) occurs in 70 % of patients within two years. No established guidance on the method or intensity of follow-up currently exists. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise literature and determine whether it is possible to identify an optimal follow up regime. To this date there are no randomised prospective studies investigating this. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes included general demographics, method, frequency and duration of follow up, survival and recurrence data. Quality assessment of the papers was performed. RESULTS Twenty-five articles published between 1994 and 2022 were included, including 9945 patients. CT was the most common imaging modality (n = 14) and CEA most common blood test (n = 11). Intensity of follow up was higher in the first two years post resection and only two papers continued follow up post 5 years resection. There was wide variation in outcome measures - Overall survival (OS) was most commonly reported. Nine papers reported OS ranging between 39 and 78.1 %. CONCLUSIONS There is wide variation in follow up methods and outcome reporting. There is no strong evidence to support intensive follow up, and the benefits of long term follow up are also unknown due to the lack of patient centred data. High quality, prospective studies should be the focus of future research as further retrospective data is unlikely to resolve uncertainties around optimal follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel Jones
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Alasdair Findlay
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, Nine Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Jonathan Rees
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK
| | - David O'Reilly
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones RP, Lee LYW, Corrie PG, Danson S, Vimalachandran D. Individualized cancer vaccines versus surveillance after adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected high-risk stage 2 and stage 3 colorectal cancer: protocol for a randomized trial. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1883-1884. [PMID: 37856683 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Pippa G Corrie
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Danson
- Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dale Vimalachandran
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jones RP, Mielgo A, Schmid M, Bury D, Andrews T, Burdak-Rothkamm S, Shackcloth M, J. S. Cross T, Fenwick S, Malik HZ, Diaz-Nieto R, Ottensmeier C, Palmer DH, Vimalachandran D. PINCER (A Platform Study for solId orgaN CancERs): an agile pan-network platform study to deliver high-quality translational research. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1108-1111. [PMID: 37075549 PMCID: PMC10805525 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ainhoa Mielgo
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael Schmid
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Danielle Bury
- Department of Pathology, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Timothy Andrews
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael Shackcloth
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Timothy J. S. Cross
- Department of Hepatology, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen Fenwick
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafa Diaz-Nieto
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christian Ottensmeier
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dale Vimalachandran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
De Souza S, Kahol de Jong J, Perone Y, Shetty S, Qurashi M, Vithayathil M, Shah T, Ross P, Temperley L, Yip VS, Banerjee A, Bettinger D, Sturm L, Reeves HL, Geh D, Orr J, Allen B, Jones RP, Sharma R. Impact of COVID-19 on 1-Year Survival Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3378. [PMID: 37444488 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe disruption of healthcare services worldwide and interrupted patients' access to essential services. During the first lockdown, many healthcare services were shut to all but emergencies. In this study, we aimed to determine the immediate and long-term indirect impact of COVID-19 health services utilisation on hepatocellular cancer (HCC) outcomes. METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted from 1 March 2020 until 30 June 2020, correlating to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were enrolled from tertiary hospitals in the UK and Germany with dedicated HCC management services. All patients with current or past HCC who were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) were identified. Any delay to treatment (DTT) and the effect on survival at one year were reported. RESULTS The median time to receipt of therapy following MDM discussion was 49 days. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages-A/B disease were more likely to experience DTT. Significant delays across all treatments for HCC were observed, but delay was most marked for those undergoing curative therapies. Even though severe delays were observed in curative HCC treatments, this did not translate into reduced survival in patients. CONCLUSION Interruption of routine healthcare services because of the COVID-19 pandemic caused severe delays in HCC treatment. However, DTT did not translate to reduced survival. Longer follow is important given the delay in therapy in those receiving curative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuell De Souza
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Jeffrey Kahol de Jong
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Ylenia Perone
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Shishir Shetty
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Maria Qurashi
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Mathew Vithayathil
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Tahir Shah
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Paul Ross
- Department of Oncology, Guys' & St. Thomas' and King's College Hospitals, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Laura Temperley
- Department of Oncology, Guys' & St. Thomas' and King's College Hospitals, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Vincent S Yip
- Barts and the London HPB Centre, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel E1 1BB, UK
| | - Abhirup Banerjee
- Barts and the London HPB Centre, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel E1 1BB, UK
| | - Dominik Bettinger
- Department of Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Sturm
- Department of Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Helen L Reeves
- Newcastle University Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Daniel Geh
- Newcastle University Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - James Orr
- Department of Hepatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Benjamin Allen
- Department of Hepatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5TR, UK
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parmar KL, O'Reilly D, Valle J, Braun M, Malcomson L, Jones RP, Balaa F, Rees M, Welsh FKS, Filobbos R, Renehan AG. Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e059369. [PMID: 36997247 PMCID: PMC10069542 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey:Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria.Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews.Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire.Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey.The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat L Parmar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Derek O'Reilly
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lee Malcomson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fady Balaa
- Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Myrddin Rees
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Fenella K S Welsh
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Rafik Filobbos
- Department of Radiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ali SE, Waddington JC, Lister A, Sison-Young R, Jones RP, Rehman AH, Goldring CEP, Naisbitt DJ, Meng X. Identification of flucloxacillin-modified hepatocellular proteins: implications in flucloxacillin-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci 2023; 192:106-116. [PMID: 36782357 PMCID: PMC10371196 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Flucloxacillin is a β-lactam antibiotic associated with a high incidence of drug-induced liver injury. Although expression of HLA-B*57:01 is associated with increased susceptibility, little is known of the pathological mechanisms involved in the induction of the clinical phenotype. Irreversible protein modification is suspected to drive the reaction through the provision of flucloxacillin-modified peptides that are presented to T-cells by the protein encoded by the risk allele. In this study, we have shown that flucloxacillin binds to multiple proteins within human primary hepatocytes, including major hepatocellular proteins (hemoglobin and albumin) and mitochondrial proteins. Inhibition of membrane transporters multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) appeared to reduce the levels of covalent binding. A diverse range of proteins with different functions was found to be targeted by flucloxacillin, including adaptor proteins (14-3-3), proteins with catalytic activities (liver carboxylesterase 1, tRNA-splicing endonuclease subunit Sen2, All-trans-retinol dehydrogenase ADH1B, Glutamate dehydrogenase 1 mitochondrial, Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase [ammonia] mitochondrial), and transporters (hemoglobin, albumin, and UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase). These flucloxacillin-modified intracellular proteins could provide a potential source of neoantigens for HLA-B*57:01 presentation by hepatocytes. More importantly, covalent binding to critical cellular proteins could be the molecular initiating events that lead to flucloxacillin-induced cholestasis Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD038581.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serat-E Ali
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - James C Waddington
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Adam Lister
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Rowena Sison-Young
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Adeeb H Rehman
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chris E P Goldring
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Dean J Naisbitt
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Xiaoli Meng
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vimalachandran D, Jones RP, Dickson E, Seehra J, Acheson A, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah S, Leung E, Torrance A, Ottensmeier C, Beggs AD, Whiteside E, Sanna H, Bury D, Youd E, Leopold G, Pugh M, Sundar S, Taylor GS. SARS-CoV-2 in the abdomen or pelvis: SAFE SURGERY study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:306-309. [PMID: 36168210 PMCID: PMC9620655 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Vimalachandran
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Trust, Chester, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ed Dickson
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jaspreet Seehra
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Austin Acheson
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Upper GI Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sivesh Kamarajah
- Upper GI Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elaine Leung
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew Torrance
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital,, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christian Ottensmeier
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew D Beggs
- Upper GI Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ellen Whiteside
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Helen Sanna
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Danielle Bury
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Esther Youd
- Department of Pathology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Llantrisant, UK
| | - Gareth Leopold
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Matthew Pugh
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Graham S Taylor
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gilbert TM, Hackett J, Holt L, Bird N, Quinn M, Gordon-Weeks A, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Malik HZ, Jones RP. Long-term morbidity after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A cohort study. Surg Oncol 2022; 45:101875. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
14
|
Nassar A, Cimpean S, Abdelhamid A, Jones RP, Wahba R, Fiorentini G, Aldrighetti L, Teh C, Alikhanov R, Hammond J, Silva M, Abdelmabod A, Truant S, Ferrero A, Sturesson C, Ahmed I, Ghazanfar M, Takemura N, Pawlik TM, Bekheit M. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6590408. [PMID: 35598157 PMCID: PMC9124362 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Nassar
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sorin Cimpean
- Department of Surgery, CHU - St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amir Abdelhamid
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Robert P. Jones
- Northwest Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roger Wahba
- Departement of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Guido Fiorentini
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, USA
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Catherine Teh
- Department of Surgery, Makati Medical Center, Makati Metro Manila, Philippines
- Department of Surgery, National Kidney & Transplant Institute, Quezon, Philippines
- Department of Surgery, St Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon, Philippines
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Department of liver and pancreatic surgery and Transplantation, Russia
| | - John Hammond
- Department of HPB and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Areeg Abdelmabod
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Stephanie Truant
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille: Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Lille, France
| | | | - Christian Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mudassar Ghazanfar
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nobuyuki Takemura
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio, USA
| | - Mohamed Bekheit
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
- Surgical Unit, HPB Integrated Center of Care, Elite Integrated Centers of Excellence, Alexandria, Egypt
- Correspondence to: Mohamed Bekheit, Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Department of Surgery, Foresthill Health Campus, Aberdeen AB252ZN, UK (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chan BKY, Carrion-Alvarez L, Telfer R, Rehman AH, Bird N, Mann K, Jones RP, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW, Diaz-Nieto R. Surgical management of suspected gallbladder cancer: The role of intraoperative frozen section for diagnostic confirmation. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:399-404. [PMID: 34689332 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative diagnosis for suspected gallbladder cancers is challenging, with a risk of overtreating benign disease, for example, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, with radical cholecystectomies. We retrospectively evaluated the surgeon's intraoperative assessment alone, and with the addition of intraoperative frozen sections, for suspected gallbladder cancers from a tertiary hepatobiliary multidisciplinary team (MDT). METHODS MDT patients with complex gallbladder disease were included. Collated data included demographics, MDT discussion, operative details, and patient outcomes. RESULTS A total of 454 patients with complex gallbladder disease were reviewed, 48 (10.6%) were offered radical surgery for suspected cancer. Twenty-five underwent frozen section that led to radical surgery in 6 (25%). All frozen sections were congruent with final histopathology but doubled the operating time (p < 0.0001). Both the surgeon's subjective and additional frozen section's objective assessment, allowed for de-escalation of unnecessary radical surgery, comparing favourably to a 13.0% cancer diagnosis among radical surgery historically. CONCLUSIONS The MDT process was highly sensitive in identifying gallbladder cancers but lacked specificity. The surgeon's intraoperative assessment is paramount in suspected cancers, and deescalated unnecessary radical surgery. Intraoperative frozen section was a safe and viable adjunct at a cost of resources and operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin K Y Chan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Lucia Carrion-Alvarez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebecca Telfer
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Adeeb H Rehman
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Nicholas Bird
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Kulbir Mann
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones RP, Pugh SA, Graham J, Primrose JN, Barriuso J. Circulating tumour DNA as a biomarker in resectable and irresectable stage IV colorectal cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2021; 144:368-381. [PMID: 33422803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, stratification for treatment (surgery or chemotherapy) is often based on crude clinicopathological characteristics like tumour size and number of lesions. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) acts as a potential biomarker of disease trajectory and biology, allowing better stratification. This study aims to systematically review ctDNA in stage IV colorectal cancer to assess its potential role as a prospective biomarker to guide management decisions. METHODS A literature search was performed to identify studies where the measurement of ctDNA in stage IV colorectal cancer was correlated with a clinical outcome (radiological response, secondary resection rate, PFS, DFS or OS). RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included, reporting on 2823 patients. Circulating tumour DNA was detectable in between 80% and 90% of patients prior to treatment. Meta-analysis identified a strong correlation between detectable ctDNA after treatment (surgery or chemotherapy) and overall survival (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.79-2.69, p < 0.00001), as well as progression-free survival (HR 3.15, 95% CI 2.10-4.73, p < 0.00001). ctDNA consistently offered an early marker of long-term prognosis in irresectable disease, with changes after one cycle of systemic therapy demonstrating prognostic value. In resectable disease treated with curative intent, detection of ctDNA offered a lead time over radiological recurrence of 10 months. CONCLUSION Circulating tumour DNA is detectable in the majority of resectable and irresectable patients. The presence of ctDNA is clearly associated with shorter overall survival, with changes in ctDNA an early biomarker of adverse disease behaviour. Prospective trials are essential to test its clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | - Janet Graham
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Jorge Barriuso
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stremitzer S, Stift J, Laengle J, Schwarz C, Kaczirek K, Jones RP, Quinn LM, Fenwick SW, Diaz-Nieto R, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Prognosis and Circumferential Margin in Patients with Resected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1493-1498. [PMID: 32914390 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09105-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection margin status is a known prognosticator in patients who undergo resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the influence of an isolated positive circumferential margin on clinical outcome is unclear. METHODS Patients with resected de novo hilar cholangiocarcinoma from two European hepatobiliary centres (Medical University of Vienna and Aintree University Hospital, 2006-2016) were classified according to resection margin status (negative, surgically positive, isolated circumferentially positive) and investigated with respect to overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and recurrence pattern. RESULTS Eighty-three (48 male/35 female) patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (range 33-80). The median follow-up was 21.7 months (range 0.3-92.4). Forty (48%) patients had negative resection margins, 25 (30%) had an isolated positive circumferential margin and 18 (22%) had a positive surgical margin. The 5-year OS rates in patients with negative, isolated positive circumferential and positive surgical resection margins were 47%, 33% and 0%, respectively. Median OS was 45.6, 32.7 and 14.5 months, respectively (log rank, P = 0.011). Upon multivariable Cox regression analysis, resection margin status and lymph node status remained statistically significant (P < 0.05). No difference with respect to RFS and recurrence pattern was found between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our data show that these three resection margin types were associated with different clinical outcomes. Circumferential margin status may therefore serve as a novel prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Stremitzer
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Judith Stift
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Laengle
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert P Jones
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Leonard M Quinn
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Neoptolemos JP, Jones RP, Büchler MW. Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-Reply. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:362-363. [PMID: 31895438 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert P Jones
- The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones RP, Psarelli EE, Jackson R, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Palmer DH, Campbell F, Valle JW, Faluyi O, O'Reilly DA, Cunningham D, Wadsley J, Darby S, Meyer T, Gillmore R, Anthoney A, Lind P, Glimelius B, Falk S, Izbicki JR, Middleton GW, Cummins S, Ross PJ, Wasan H, McDonald A, Crosby T, Ting Y, Patel K, Sherriff D, Soomal R, Borg D, Sothi S, Hammel P, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Tjaden C, Strobel O, Hackert T, Büchler MW, Neoptolemos JP. Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the ESPAC-4 Randomized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:1038-1048. [PMID: 31483448 PMCID: PMC6727687 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance The patterns of disease recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. Objective To define patterns of recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy and the association with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospectively collected data from the phase 3 European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 4 adjuvant clinical trial, an international multicenter study. The study included 730 patients who had resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Data were analyzed between July 2017 and May 2019. Interventions Randomization to adjuvant gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus capecitabine. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival, recurrence, and sites of recurrence. Results Of the 730 patients, median age was 65 years (range 37-81 years), 414 were men (57%), and 316 were women (43%). The median follow-up time from randomization was 43.2 months (95% CI, 39.7-45.5 months), with overall survival from time of surgery of 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.8-29.9 months) with gemcitabine and 30.2 months (95% CI, 25.8-33.5 months) with the combination (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P = .03). The 5-year survival estimates were 17.1% (95% CI, 11.6%-23.5%) and 28.0% (22.0%-34.3%), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 479 patients (65.6%); another 78 patients (10.7%) died without recurrence. Local recurrence occurred at a median of 11.63 months (95% CI, 10.05-12.19 months), significantly different from those with distant recurrence with a median of 9.49 months (95% CI, 8.44-10.71 months) (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45; P = .04). Following recurrence, the median survival was 9.36 months (95% CI, 8.08-10.48 months) for local recurrence and 8.94 months (95% CI, 7.82-11.17 months) with distant recurrence (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09; P = .27). The median overall survival of patients with distant-only recurrence (23.03 months; 95% CI, 19.55-25.85 months) or local with distant recurrence (23.82 months; 95% CI, 17.48-28.32 months) was not significantly different from those with only local recurrence (24.83 months; 95% CI, 22.96-27.63 months) (P = .85 and P = .35, respectively). Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had a 21% reduction of death following recurrence compared with monotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance There were no significant differences between the time to recurrence and subsequent and overall survival between local and distant recurrence. Pancreatic cancer behaves as a systemic disease requiring effective systemic therapy after resection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00058201, EudraCT 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN 96397434.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, England
| | | | | | - Paula Ghaneh
- The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, England
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Christopher M Halloran
- The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, England
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, England
| | - Fiona Campbell
- The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, England
| | - Juan W Valle
- University of Manchester/The Christie, Manchester, England
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim Meyer
- Royal Free Hospital, London, England
| | | | | | - Pehr Lind
- Clinical Research Sörmland, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Clinical Research Sörmland, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stephen Falk
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, England
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- University of Hamburg Medical Institutions UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Alec McDonald
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | | | - Yuk Ting
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, England
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julia Mayerle
- Greifswald University, Medicine, Greifswald, Germany
- University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kron P, Linecker M, Jones RP, Toogood GJ, Clavien PA, Lodge JPA. Ablation or Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1052. [PMID: 31750233 PMCID: PMC6843026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Successful use of ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) has led to interest in the role of ablation for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, there remains a lack of clarity about the use of ablation for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), specifically its efficacy compared with hepatic resection. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase until December 2018. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence for ablation vs. resection in the treatment of CRLM. Results: This review identified 1,773 studies of which 18 were eligible for inclusion. In the majority of the studies, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly higher and local recurrence (LR) rates were significantly lower in the resection groups. On subgroup analysis of solitary CRLM, resection was associated with improved OS, DFS, and reduced LR. Three series assessed the outcome of resection vs. ablation for technically resectable CRLM, and showed improved outcome in the resection group. In fact, there were no studies showing a survival advantage of ablation compared to resection in the treatment of CRLM. Conclusions: Resection remains the "gold standard" in the treatment of CRLM and should not be replaced by ablation at present. This review supports the use of ablation only as an adjunct to resection and as a single treatment option when resection is not safely possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kron
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Giles J Toogood
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J P A Lodge
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Surgery remains a mainstay in the treatment of most solid cancers. Surgeons have always engaged in various forms of high-quality cancer research to optimize outcomes for their patients, for example, contributing to clinical research and outcomes research as well as health education and public health policy. Over the past decade, however, concerns have been raised about a global decline in the number of surgeons performing basic science research alongside clinical activity - so-called surgeon scientists. Herein, we describe some of the unique obstacles faced by contemporary trainee and practising surgeons engaged in research, as well as providing a perspective on the implications of the diminishing prominence of the surgeon scientist. Finally, we offer some thoughts on potential strategies and future directions for surgical engagement in oncology research to increase the number of research-active surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. .,North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Chandrakanth Are
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Department of Surgery, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Charles M Balch
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dupré A, Jones RP, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Preoperative Leucocyte-Based Inflammatory Scores in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: Can We Count on Them? World J Surg 2019; 43:1351-1359. [PMID: 30673814 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04914-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been identified as potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in primary colorectal cancer, and there is a growing interest in their use in colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). However, optimal cut-off values for these ratios have not been defined by making comparison between series difficult. This study aimed to confirm the prognostic value of inflammatory scores in patients undergoing resection for CLM. METHODS We retrospectively analysed data from 376 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for CLM between June 2010 and August 2015. We assessed the reproducibility of previously published ratios and determined new cut-off values using the Cut-off Finder web-based tool. Relations between cut-off values and OS were analysed with Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariate Cox models. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-three patients had full preoperative blood tests for calculation of NLR, PLR and LMR. The number of cut-off values which showed a significant discrimination for OS was 49/249 (19.7%) for NLR, 28/316 (8.9%) for PLR and 22/214 (10.3%) for LMR, all with a scattered nonlinear distribution. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that inflammatory scores expressed as ratios do not seem to be consistently reliable prognostic markers in patients with resectable CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Dupré
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - Robert P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, School of Cancer Studies, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rehman AH, Jones RP, Poston G. Prognostic and predictive markers in liver limited stage IV colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:2251-2256. [PMID: 31279594 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer among both men and women. Personalised treatment options remain complex, although there is broad agreement over which patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) should and should not be offered resection. Decisions on an optimal management strategy involves careful assessment of both technical and oncological factors. In this review we aim to summarise current prognostic biomarkers for metastatic colorectal cancers, specifically patients considered for resection. A number of clinico-pathological factors have been identified as prognostically important with good internal validity, but limited external validity. Furthermore, these prognostic scoring systems do not take factor in modern chemotherapeutic agents and the disease modification these agents produce. Histopathological response to chemotherapy is of significant prognostic importance. Molecular markers can help predict the efficacy of a biological agent. An important prognostic factor of liver metastasis is the recognition that location of the primary colorectal cancer impacts on metastatic phenotype and represents difference in genotype, i.e. proximal tumours are more aggressive than distal tumours with an increased likelihood of disease progression. Several mutational molecular markers identified include microsatellite instability, BRAF, and KRAS/NRAS and combination mutations, which confer poorer outcomes. Accurate prognostication in patients with liver limited colorectal metastases remains crucial, as this allows tailoring treatment options to each disease and improving outcomes. Access to tissue before treatment remains a limitation although advances in ability to assess tumour biology by non-invasive methods are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeeb H Rehman
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.
| | - Robert P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK
| | - Graeme Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stremitzer S, Jones RP, Quinn LM, Fenwick SW, Diaz-Nieto R, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Clinical outcome after resection of early-stage hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:213-217. [PMID: 30360988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation in patients with unresectable early-stage (<3 cm, node negative) hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been recently reported to be associated with longer survival compared to liver resection and therefore suggested as potential treatment option also in resectable disease. Here, we investigated the outcome of resection in early-stage tumours as the standard of care in an experienced European centre. METHODS Patients with de novo resectable hilar cholangiocarcinomas who underwent liver resection between mid-2009 and December 2017 were classified as early-stage (<3 cm and node negative) or later-stage tumours (≥3 cm and/or node positive), and were investigated with respect to clinical outcome. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were analyzed of whom 17 had early-stage tumours and 39 had later-stage tumours. The sex ratio (m:f) was 30:26. The median age was 65 years (range 33-80). The median follow-up was 17.0 months (range 0.7-92.4). 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82% in patients with early-stage tumours and 23% in patients with later-stage tumours, respectively. Median OS was 89.9 months and 27.6 months, respectively (HR 0.25 (95% CI 0.08-0.84), P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS In an experienced European centre, 5-year survival rates after liver resection for early-stage hilar cholangiocarcinoma are comparable with reported outcomes after transplantation. The results of this study question the value of liver transplantation in this setting, especially with respect to the shortage of transplantable organs worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Stremitzer
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Robert P Jones
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Leonard M Quinn
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evans JP, Winiarski BK, Sutton PA, Jones RP, Ressel L, Duckworth CA, Pritchard DM, Lin ZX, Fretwell VL, Tweedle EM, Costello E, Goldring CE, Copple IM, Park BK, Palmer DH, Kitteringham NR. Correction: The Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol is a potent antitumour agent in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2019; 10:685. [PMID: 30774766 PMCID: PMC6363008 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25497.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Evans
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Boleslaw K Winiarski
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Paul A Sutton
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenzo Ressel
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie A Duckworth
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Zhi-Xiu Lin
- School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | - Vicky L Fretwell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth M Tweedle
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Eithne Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher E Goldring
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ian M Copple
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - B Kevin Park
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oppelt A, Kaschek D, Huppelschoten S, Sison-Young R, Zhang F, Buck-Wiese M, Herrmann F, Malkusch S, Krüger CL, Meub M, Merkt B, Zimmermann L, Schofield A, Jones RP, Malik H, Schilling M, Heilemann M, van de Water B, Goldring CE, Park BK, Timmer J, Klingmüller U. Model-based identification of TNFα-induced IKKβ-mediated and IκBα-mediated regulation of NFκB signal transduction as a tool to quantify the impact of drug-induced liver injury compounds. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2018; 4:23. [PMID: 29900006 PMCID: PMC5995845 DOI: 10.1038/s41540-018-0058-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become a major problem for patients and for clinicians, academics and the pharmaceutical industry. To date, existing hepatotoxicity test systems are only poorly predictive and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. One of the factors known to amplify hepatotoxicity is the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), especially due to its synergy with commonly used drugs such as diclofenac. However, the exact mechanism of how diclofenac in combination with TNFα induces liver injury remains elusive. Here, we combined time-resolved immunoblotting and live-cell imaging data of HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes (PHH) with dynamic pathway modeling using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to describe the complex structure of TNFα-induced NFκB signal transduction and integrated the perturbations of the pathway caused by diclofenac. The resulting mathematical model was used to systematically identify parameters affected by diclofenac. These analyses showed that more than one regulatory module of TNFα-induced NFκB signal transduction is affected by diclofenac, suggesting that hepatotoxicity is the integrated consequence of multiple changes in hepatocytes and that multiple factors define toxicity thresholds. Applying our mathematical modeling approach to other DILI-causing compounds representing different putative DILI mechanism classes enabled us to quantify their impact on pathway activation, highlighting the potential of the dynamic pathway model as a quantitative tool for the analysis of DILI compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Oppelt
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Kaschek
- 2Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Suzanna Huppelschoten
- 3Division of Toxicology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rowena Sison-Young
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fang Zhang
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marie Buck-Wiese
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Herrmann
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Malkusch
- 5Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Single Molecule Biophysics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Carmen L Krüger
- 5Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Single Molecule Biophysics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mara Meub
- 5Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Single Molecule Biophysics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benjamin Merkt
- 2Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lea Zimmermann
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amy Schofield
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,6North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Malik
- 6North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marcel Schilling
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mike Heilemann
- 5Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Single Molecule Biophysics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.,7Bioquant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bob van de Water
- 3Division of Toxicology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher E Goldring
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - B Kevin Park
- 4MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jens Timmer
- 2Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,8BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Klingmüller
- 1Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Evans JP, Winiarski BK, Sutton PA, Jones RP, Ressel L, Duckworth CA, Pritchard DM, Lin ZX, Fretwell VL, Tweedle EM, Costello E, Goldring CE, Copple IM, Park BK, Palmer DH, Kitteringham NR. The Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol is a potent antitumour agent in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:27104-27116. [PMID: 29930754 PMCID: PMC6007465 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Nrf2 is a transcription factor that regulates cellular stress response and irinotecan-metabolising pathways. Its aberrant activity has been reported in a number of cancers, although relatively few studies have explored a role for Nrf2 in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study assessed the expression of Nrf2 in patient CRC tissues and explored the effect of Nrf2 modulation alone, or in combination with irinotecan, in human (HCT116) and murine (CT26) cell lines in vitro and in an orthotopic syngeneic mouse model utilising bioluminescent imaging. Using a tissue microarray, Nrf2 was found to be overexpressed (p<0.01) in primary CRC and metastatic tissue relative to normal colon, with a positive correlation between Nrf2 expression in matched primary and metastatic samples. In vitro experiments in CRC cell lines revealed that Nrf2 siRNA and brusatol, which is known to inhibit Nrf2, decreased viability and sensitised cells to irinotecan toxicity. Furthermore, brusatol effectively abrogated CRC tumour growth in subcutaneously and orthotopically-allografted mice, resulting in an average 8-fold reduction in luminescence at the study end-point (p=0.02). Our results highlight Nrf2 as a promising drug target in the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Evans
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Boleslaw K Winiarski
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Paul A Sutton
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenzo Ressel
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie A Duckworth
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Zhi-Xiu Lin
- School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | - Vicky L Fretwell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth M Tweedle
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Eithne Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher E Goldring
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ian M Copple
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - B Kevin Park
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Quinn LM, Dunne DFJ, Jones RP, Poston GJ, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW. Optimal perioperative care in peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection. Eur Surg 2018; 50:93-99. [PMID: 29875797 PMCID: PMC5968056 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-018-0529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection remains the only proven curative treatment for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Despite recent advances in liver surgery techniques and perioperative care, resection for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Considerable variation in the perioperative management of these patients exists. Optimal perioperative management has the potential to deliver improved outcomes. This article seeks to summarize the evidence underpinning best practice in the perioperative care of patients undergoing resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The authors also seek to identify areas where research efforts and future clinical trials should be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard M. Quinn
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
- Institute of translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, UK
| | - Declan F. J. Dunne
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P. Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J. Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z. Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W. Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dupré A, Rehman A, Jones RP, Parker A, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Validation of clinical prognostic scores for patients treated with curative-intent for recurrent colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1330-1336. [PMID: 29315600 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scoring systems were developed to stratify patients with colorectal liver metastases considered for liver resection into different risk groups. Such scores have never been evaluated in recurrent liver metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these scores are applicable to patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases and treated with curative intent. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 375 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases between June 2010 and August 2015. Seventy-three patients developed liver-limited recurrence treated with curative intent. The predictive value of 6 scores (Fong, Sofocleous, Nagashima, Nordlinger, Konopke, and the Basingstoke index) was assessed in this set of patients. RESULTS Median follow-up was 36.2 months. Overall survival and progression-free survival were 33.6 and 5.6 months, respectively. When scores were applied for OS, none showed a significant stratification between patients, although Nagashima's score showed a significant difference in overall survival between patients from the low-risk group and those from the intermediate- and high-risk groups (40.8 vs 30.5 months, P = 0.039). For PFS, only Fong's score showed a statistically significant stratification (6.6 vs 4.7 months, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION Scoring systems are of limited-value in stratifying patients operated on for recurrent colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Dupré
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Adeeb Rehman
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Alex Parker
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jones RP, Kellett J. The way healthcare is funded is wrong: it should be linked to deaths as well as age, gender and social deprivation. Acute Med 2018; 17:212-216. [PMID: 30882104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND most spending on health occurs in the last few months of life. This study explored the number of deaths in England and their relationship to healthcare funding. METHODS post hoc analysis Results: the number of deaths range from 3.3 to 15.1/1000/year, and the number of deaths per general practitioner from 5.2 to 27.3/year. Hospital deaths range from 12 to 52/1000 admissions. The correlation between the allocation index used for funding and deaths is not perfect and suggests that some regions may get up to17% less and others 14% more funding than is equitable. CONCLUSION there is considerable variation in the prevalence of death throughout England. If healthcare funding considered the local number of deaths it would be more equitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Jones
- Statistical Advisor, Healthcare Analysis & Forecasting, Worcester, UK
| | - J Kellett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dupré A, Malik HZ, Jones RP, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ. Influence of the primary tumour location in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 44:80-86. [PMID: 29183640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.10.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) seems to be altered when the primary tumour is right-sided. However, data are lacking and conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the influence of the primary tumour location on oncologic outcomes following such surgery. METHODS We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 376 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for CLM between June 2010 and August 2015. We compared the outcomes of patients with right colon tumours and those with left colorectal tumours. The splenic flexure was used as the cut-off point to determine the anatomic primary site. RESULTS Among the 364 patients eligible, 74 (20.3%) had a right-sided primary tumour. These patients were older, had a poorer American Society of Anaesthesiologists status and had fewer node-positive primary tumours. The CLM characteristics were similar between both groups. Median PFS was not significantly different between the two groups at 9.9 months, as well as the pattern of recurrence. Median OS was shorter for patients with right-sided primary tumour (34.6 versus 45.3 months, p = 0.035). Similar results were observed when patients with rectal tumour were excluded from analysis (34.6 vs. 47.5 months, p = 0.007). Primary tumour site was an independent prognosis factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Right-sided location of the primary tumour is associated with worse OS after surgery for CLM, but seems to have no influence on PFS, and on the pattern of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Dupré
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK; Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, Lyon, F-69008, France.
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK; School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sutton PA, Jithesh PV, Jones RP, Evans JP, Vimalachandran D, Malik HZ, Park BK, Goldring CE, Palmer DH, Kitteringham NR. Exome sequencing of synchronously resected primary colorectal tumours and colorectal liver metastases to inform oncosurgical management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 44:115-121. [PMID: 29174709 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.10.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next generation sequencing technology has facilitated mapping of the colorectal cancer genotype and furthered our understanding of metastogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate for conserved and different mutations in the exomes of synchronously resected primary colorectal tumour and liver metastases. This information could potentially be utilised to guide the treatment of advanced disease with the help of biological information from the primary tumour. METHODS We performed exome sequencing of synchronously resected primary colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases as well as normal colonic mucosa and liver parenchyma, from four patients who had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, at a depth of 50X using the Ion Proton platform. Raw data was mapped to the reference genome prior to variant calling, annotation and downstream analysis. RESULTS Exome sequencing identified 585 non-synonymous missense single nucleotide variants (SNVs), of which 215 (36.8%) were unique to the primary tumour, 226 (38.6%) unique to the metastasis and 81 (13.8%) present in patient matched pairs. SNVs identified in the ErbB pathway appear to be concordant between primary and metastatic tumours. CONCLUSION Only 13.8% of the metastatic exome can be predicted by the genotype of the primary tumour. We have demonstrated concordance of a number of SNVs in the ErbB pathway, which may inform selection of therapeutic agents in advanced colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Sutton
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
| | - P V Jithesh
- Sidra Medical and Research Centre, Doha, Qatar
| | - R P Jones
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - J P Evans
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - D Vimalachandran
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Road, Chester, CH2 1UL, UK
| | - H Z Malik
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - B K Park
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - C E Goldring
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - D H Palmer
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - N R Kitteringham
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dupré A, Jones RP, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Curative-intent treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases: A comparison between ablation and resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1901-1907. [PMID: 28888801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver-limited recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases is a frequent occurrence, and can in some cases be treated with curative intent. Although surgical re-resection remains standard of care, there is growing interest in the role of ablation in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes after curative-intent ablation and resection in patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases. METHODS We retrospectively analysed data from 366 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases between June 2010 and August 2015. Sixty-four developed liver-limited recurrence which was treated with curative intent, thirty-three (51.6%) by ablation and 31 (48.4%) by repeat resection. RESULTS Patient groups were well matched, with surgically resected patients showing higher pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and larger metastases. There were fewer post-operative complications and shorter length of stay in the ablation group (p < 0.02). After a median follow-up of 36.2 months, median overall survival was the same for both the resected and ablated groups at 33.3 months. Median progression-free survival was longer for patients treated with surgery (10.2 months) compared to ablation (4.3 months) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Ablation or resection for liver-limited recurrence after surgery for colorectal liver metastases is associated with improved overall survival compared with systemic chemotherapy alone, and should always be considered for patients with resectable liver recurrence. Although ablation seemed to be associated with a shorter progression-free survival, post-procedure morbidity was significantly lower. The choice between ablation and resection should therefore be made on a personalised basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Dupré
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK; Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, Lyon, F-69008, France.
| | - Robert P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK; School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jones RP, Brudvik KW, Franklin JM, Poston GJ. Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases: Opportunities and challenges of omics-based decision making. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:875-883. [PMID: 28302330 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision surgery involves improving patient selection to ensure that surgical intervention that is proven to benefit on a population level is the optimal treatment for each individual patient. For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), existing prognostic scoring systems rely on well-recognised histopathological features such as size and number of lesions. Advances in preoperative imaging algorithms mean that increasingly low volume disease can be detected, improving assessment of these factors. In addition, novel imaging modalities mean that underlying tumour biology and metabolic behaviour during therapy can be assessed. Molecular analysis of tumours can provide crucial prognostic information, with the critical role of RAS/RAF mutations in prognosis well recognised. The optimal source of tissue for this level of analysis is debated, with good concordance between primary and metastatic lesions for some recognised prognostic factors but marked discrepancies for a variety of other relevant mutations. As well as mutational heterogeneity between primary and metastatic lesions, heterogeneity within tumours and dynamic changes in tumour biology over time present a significant challenge in assessing tumour for prognostic biomarkers. Circulating tumour cells offer one potential method of longitudinal tumour analysis, but are limited by current technologies. This review article summarises some of the key advances in prognostication for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases, as well as highlighting the potential limitations of such an approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Jones
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - K W Brudvik
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J M Franklin
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - G J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wadsworth PK, Jones RP, Poston GJ. Resection of primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the presence of irresectable liver metastases. International Journal of Endocrine Oncology 2016. [DOI: 10.2217/ije-2016-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors often present at an advanced stage and carry a variable prognosis, with many patients living long periods even with metastatic disease. Resection of the primary tumor when liver metastases are unresectable is a contentious subject with no consensus between existing guidelines. A number of recent studies have suggested a potential survival benefit as well as improved symptom control with resection. With variable results from nonoperative management strategies, the risk:benefit ratio of resection of the primary tumor may be favorable for carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa K Wadsworth
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 50% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases. Only a minority of patients present with technically resectable disease. Around 40% of those undergoing surgical resection are alive five years after their diagnosis compared with less than 1% for those with disseminated disease treated with systemic chemotherapy. Surgical resection remains the only possibility for long-term survival for these patients and great efforts have been made to increase the rates of resection whilst improving long-term outcomes. SUMMARY This review considers current technical and oncological criteria for resection, as well as targeted approaches to stratify underlying tumor biology in order to better predict long-term benefit. The role of neoadjuvant and perioperative systemic chemotherapy is critically reviewed, with suggestions for patient stratification in order to identify those who are likely to derive the greatest benefit. The key role of multidisciplinary assessment and decision making for these complex patients is also discussed. KEY MESSAGES Surgery remains the optimal treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Despite the curative intent of surgical resection, the majority of patients develop recurrence. Surgical strategies should therefore be adopted to maximize the potential for repeat resections in the event of recurrence. Although a number of preoperative prognostic markers have been identified, none are absolute contraindications to resection. In order to reduce postoperative recurrence, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is now the standard of care in a number of countries. The evidence base for this approach is contentious, and the potential benefit of such a strategy is likely to be greatest in patients with high oncological risk disease. Multidisciplinary care is essential to ensure the optimal management of these complex patients. In addition, all patients with CRLM should be discussed with specialist hepatobiliary surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom,North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom,*Robert Jones, BSc(Hons), MBChB, PhD School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA (United Kingdom), Tel. +44 0 7813 845562, E-Mail
| | | | - Gunnar Folprecht
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University Cancer Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vohra RS, Pasquali S, Kirkham AJ, Marriott P, Johnstone M, Spreadborough P, Alderson D, Griffiths EA, Fenwick S, Elmasry M, Nunes Q, Kennedy D, Basit Khan R, Khan MAS, Magee CJ, Jones SM, Mason D, Parappally CP, Mathur P, Saunders M, Jamel S, Ul Haque S, Zafar S, Shiwani MH, Samuel N, Dar F, Jackson A, Lovett B, Dindyal S, Winter H, Fletcher T, Rahman S, Wheatley K, Nieto T, Ayaani S, Youssef H, Nijjar RS, Watkin H, Naumann D, Emeshi S, Sarmah PB, Lee K, Joji N, Heath J, Teasdale RL, Weerasinghe C, Needham PJ, Welbourn H, Forster L, Finch D, Blazeby JM, Robb W, McNair AGK, Hrycaiczuk A, Charalabopoulos A, Kadirkamanathan S, Tang CB, Jayanthi NVG, Noor N, Dobbins B, Cockbain AJ, Nilsen-Nunn A, Siqueira J, Pellen M, Cowley JB, Ho WM, Miu V, White TJ, Hodgkins KA, Kinghorn A, Tutton MG, Al-Abed YA, Menzies D, Ahmad A, Reed J, Khan S, Monk D, Vitone LJ, Murtaza G, Joel A, Brennan S, Shier D, Zhang C, Yoganathan T, Robinson SJ, McCallum IJD, Jones MJ, Elsayed M, Tuck L, Wayman J, Carney K, Aroori S, Hosie KB, Kimble A, Bunting DM, Fawole AS, Basheer M, Dave RV, Sarveswaran J, Jones E, Kendal C, Tilston MP, Gough M, Wallace T, Singh S, Downing J, Mockford KA, Issa E, Shah N, Chauhan N, Wilson TR, Forouzanfar A, Wild JRL, Nofal E, Bunnell C, Madbak K, Rao STV, Devoto L, Siddiqi N, Khawaja Z, Hewes JC, Gould L, Chambers A, Urriza Rodriguez D, Sen G, Robinson S, Carney K, Bartlett F, Rae DM, Stevenson TEJ, Sarvananthan K, Dwerryhouse SJ, Higgs SM, Old OJ, Hardy TJ, Shah R, Hornby ST, Keogh K, Frank L, Al-Akash M, Upchurch EA, Frame RJ, Hughes M, Jelley C, Weaver S, Roy S, Sillo TO, Galanopoulos G, Cuming T, Cunha P, Tayeh S, Kaptanis S, Heshaishi M, Eisawi A, Abayomi M, Ngu WS, Fleming K, Singh Bajwa D, Chitre V, Aryal K, Ferris P, Silva M, Lammy S, Mohamed S, Khawaja A, Hussain A, Ghazanfar MA, Bellini MI, Ebdewi H, Elshaer M, Gravante G, Drake B, Ogedegbe A, Mukherjee D, Arhi C, Giwa Nusrat Iqbal L, Watson NF, Kumar Aggarwal S, Orchard P, Villatoro E, Willson PD, Wa K, Mok J, Woodman T, Deguara J, Garcea G, Babu BI, Dennison AR, Malde D, Lloyd D, Satheesan S, Al-Taan O, Boddy A, Slavin JP, Jones RP, Ballance L, Gerakopoulos S, Jambulingam P, Mansour S, Sakai N, Acharya V, Sadat MM, Karim L, Larkin D, Amin K, Khan A, Law J, Jamdar S, Smith SR, Sampat K, M O'shea K, Manu M, Asprou FM, Malik NS, Chang J, Johnstone M, Lewis M, Roberts GP, Karavadra B, Photi E, Hewes J, Gould L, Chambers A, Rodriguez D, O'Reilly DA, Rate AJ, Sekhar H, Henderson LT, Starmer BZ, Coe PO, Tolofari S, Barrie J, Bashir G, Sloane J, Madanipour S, Halkias C, Trevatt AEJ, Borowski DW, Hornsby J, Courtney MJ, Virupaksha S, Seymour K, Robinson S, Hawkins H, Bawa S, Gallagher PV, Reid A, Wood P, Finch JG, Parmar J, Stirland E, Gardner-Thorpe J, Al-Muhktar A, Peterson M, Majeed A, Bajwa FM, Martin J, Choy A, Tsang A, Pore N, Andrew DR, Al-Khyatt W, Taylor C, Bhandari S, Chambers A, Subramanium D, Toh SKC, Carter NC, Mercer SJ, Knight B, Tate S, Pearce B, Wainwright D, Vijay V, Alagaratnam S, Sinha S, Khan S, El-Hasani SS, Hussain AA, Bhattacharya V, Kansal N, Fasih T, Jackson C, Siddiqui MN, Chishti IA, Fordham IJ, Siddiqui Z, Bausbacher H, Geogloma I, Gurung K, Tsavellas G, Basynat P, Kiran Shrestha A, Basu S, Chhabra Mohan Harilingam A, Rabie M, Akhtar M, Kumar P, Jafferbhoy SF, Hussain N, Raza S, Haque M, Alam I, Aseem R, Patel S, Asad M, Booth MI, Ball WR, Wood CPJ, Pinho-Gomes AC, Kausar A, Rami Obeidallah M, Varghase J, Lodhia J, Bradley D, Rengifo C, Lindsay D, Gopalswamy S, Finlay I, Wardle S, Bullen N, Iftikhar SY, Awan A, Ahmed J, Leeder P, Fusai G, Bond-Smith G, Psica A, Puri Y, Hou D, Noble F, Szentpali K, Broadhurst J, Date R, Hossack MR, Li Goh Y, Turner P, Shetty V, Riera M, Macano CAW, Sukha A, Preston SR, Hoban JR, Puntis DJ, Williams SV, Krysztopik R, Kynaston J, Batt J, Doe M, Goscimski A, Jones GH, Smith SR, Hall C, Carty N, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, Gunasekera RT, Sheel ARG, Lennon H, Hindley C, Reddy M, Kenny R, Elkheir N, McGlone ER, Rajaganeshan R, Hancorn K, Hargreaves A, Prasad R, Longbotham DA, Vijayanand D, Wijetunga I, Ziprin P, Nicolay CR, Yeldham G, Read E, Gossage JA, Rolph RC, Ebied H, Phull M, Khan MA, Popplewell M, Kyriakidis D, Hussain A, Henley N, Packer JR, Derbyshire L, Porter J, Appleton S, Farouk M, Basra M, Jennings NA, Ali S, Kanakala V, Ali H, Lane R, Dickson-Lowe R, Zarsadias P, Mirza D, Puig S, Al Amari K, Vijayan D, Sutcliffe R, Marudanayagam R, Hamady Z, Prasad AR, Patel A, Durkin D, Kaur P, Bowen L, Byrne JP, Pearson KL, Delisle TG, Davies J, Tomlinson MA, Johnpulle MA, Slawinski C, Macdonald A, Nicholson J, Newton K, Mbuvi J, Farooq A, Sidhartha Mothe B, Zafrani Z, Brett D, Francombe J, Spreadborough P, Barnes J, Cheung M, Al-Bahrani AZ, Preziosi G, Urbonas T, Alberts J, Mallik M, Patel K, Segaran A, Doulias T, Sufi PA, Yao C, Pollock S, Manzelli A, Wajed S, Kourkulos M, Pezzuto R, Wadley M, Hamilton E, Jaunoo S, Padwick R, Sayegh M, Newton RC, Hebbar M, Farag SF, Spearman J, Hamdan MF, D'Costa C, Blane C, Giles M, Peter MB, Hirst NA, Hossain T, Pannu A, El-Dhuwaib Y, Morrison TEM, Taylor GW, Thompson RLE, McCune K, Loughlin P, Lawther R, Byrnes CK, Simpson DJ, Mawhinney A, Warren C, McKay D, McIlmunn C, Martin S, MacArtney M, Diamond T, Davey P, Jones C, Clements JM, Digney R, Chan WM, McCain S, Gull S, Janeczko A, Dorrian E, Harris A, Dawson S, Johnston D, McAree B, Ghareeb E, Thomas G, Connelly M, McKenzie S, Cieplucha K, Spence G, Campbell W, Hooks G, Bradley N, Hill ADK, Cassidy JT, Boland M, Burke P, Nally DM, Hill ADK, Khogali E, Shabo W, Iskandar E, McEntee GP, O'Neill MA, Peirce C, Lyons EM, O'Sullivan AW, Thakkar R, Carroll P, Ivanovski I, Balfe P, Lee M, Winter DC, Kelly ME, Hoti E, Maguire D, Karunakaran P, Geoghegan JG, Martin ST, McDermott F, Cross KS, Cooke F, Zeeshan S, Murphy JO, Mealy K, Mohan HM, Nedujchelyn Y, Fahad Ullah M, Ahmed I, Giovinazzo F, Milburn J, Prince S, Brooke E, Buchan J, Khalil AM, Vaughan EM, Ramage MI, Aldridge RC, Gibson S, Nicholson GA, Vass DG, Grant AJ, Holroyd DJ, Jones MA, Sutton CMLR, O'Dwyer P, Nilsson F, Weber B, Williamson TK, Lalla K, Bryant A, Carter CR, Forrest CR, Hunter DI, Nassar AH, Orizu MN, Knight K, Qandeel H, Suttie S, Belding R, McClarey A, Boyd AT, Guthrie GJK, Lim PJ, Luhmann A, Watson AJM, Richards CH, Nicol L, Madurska M, Harrison E, Boyce KM, Roebuck A, Ferguson G, Pati P, Wilson MSJ, Dalgaty F, Fothergill L, Driscoll PJ, Mozolowski KL, Banwell V, Bennett SP, Rogers PN, Skelly BL, Rutherford CL, Mirza AK, Lazim T, Lim HCC, Duke D, Ahmed T, Beasley WD, Wilkinson MD, Maharaj G, Malcolm C, Brown TH, Shingler GM, Mowbray N, Radwan R, Morcous P, Wood S, Kadhim A, Stewart DJ, Baker AL, Tanner N, Shenoy H, Hafiz S, Marchi JA, Singh-Ranger D, Hisham E, Ainley P, O'Neill S, Terrace J, Napetti S, Hopwood B, Rhys T, Downing J, Kanavati O, Coats M, Aleksandrov D, Kallaway C, Yahya S, Weber B, Templeton A, Trotter M, Lo C, Dhillon A, Heywood N, Aawsaj Y, Hamdan A, Reece-Bolton O, McGuigan A, Shahin Y, Ali A, Luther A, Nicholson JA, Rajendran I, Boal M, Ritchie J. Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1716-1726. [PMID: 27748962 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aims of this prospective population-based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals.
Methods
Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish hospitals between 1 March and 1 May 2014. Potential explanatory variables influencing the performance of emergency cholecystectomy were analysed by means of multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modelling using a two-level hierarchical structure with patients (level 1) nested within hospitals (level 2).
Results
Data were collected on 4744 cholecystectomies from 165 hospitals. Increasing age, lower ASA fitness grade, biliary colic, the need for further imaging (magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), endoscopic interventions (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and admission to a non-biliary centre significantly reduced the likelihood of an emergency cholecystectomy being performed. The multilevel model was used to calculate the probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy for a woman aged 40 years or over with an ASA grade of I or II and a BMI of at least 25·0 kg/m2, who presented with acute cholecystitis with an ultrasound scan showing a thick-walled gallbladder and a normal common bile duct. The mean predicted probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy was 0·52 (95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·57). The predicted probabilities ranged from 0·02 to 0·95 across the 165 hospitals, demonstrating significant variation between hospitals.
Conclusion
Patients with similar characteristics presenting to different hospitals with acute gallbladder pathology do not receive comparable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R S Vohra
- Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - S Pasquali
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - A J Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Marriott
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Johnstone
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Spreadborough
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Alderson
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - E A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Fenwick
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Elmasry
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Q Nunes
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Kennedy
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - D Mason
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital
| | | | | | | | - S Jamel
- Barnet and Chase Farm Hospital
| | | | - S Zafar
- Barnet and Chase Farm Hospital
| | | | - N Samuel
- Barnsley District General Hospital
| | - F Dar
- Barnsley District General Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Wheatley
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - T Nieto
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - S Ayaani
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - H Youssef
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | | | - H Watkin
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - D Naumann
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - S Emeshi
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | | | - K Lee
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - N Joji
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - J Heath
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R L Teasdale
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - P J Needham
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Welbourn
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Forster
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Finch
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - W Robb
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - B Dobbins
- Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - M Pellen
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | | | - W-M Ho
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | - V Miu
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | - T J White
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K A Hodgkins
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Kinghorn
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M G Tutton
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Y A Al-Abed
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Menzies
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Ahmad
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Reed
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Khan
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Monk
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L J Vitone
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Murtaza
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Joel
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - D Shier
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
| | - C Zhang
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - M J Jones
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - M Elsayed
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - L Tuck
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - J Wayman
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - K Carney
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M P Tilston
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Gough
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Wallace
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Singh
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Downing
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K A Mockford
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Issa
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Shah
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Chauhan
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T R Wilson
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Forouzanfar
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J R L Wild
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Nofal
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Bunnell
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Madbak
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S T V Rao
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Devoto
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Siddiqi
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Z Khawaja
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - D M Rae
- Frimley Park Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - O J Old
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - R Shah
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - K Keogh
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - L Frank
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - M Al-Akash
- Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - R J Frame
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Hughes
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Jelley
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - T Cuming
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | - P Cunha
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | - S Tayeh
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | - A Eisawi
- Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - W S Ngu
- Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - V Chitre
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Aryal
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Ferris
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H Ebdewi
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Elshaer
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Gravante
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - B Drake
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Ogedegbe
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - D Mukherjee
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - C Arhi
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Wa
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Mok
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Woodman
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Deguara
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Garcea
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - B I Babu
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | | | - D Malde
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - D Lloyd
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | | | - O Al-Taan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - A Boddy
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - J P Slavin
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R P Jones
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Ballance
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Gerakopoulos
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Jambulingam
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Mansour
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Sakai
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Acharya
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M M Sadat
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - L Karim
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - D Larkin
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - K Amin
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - A Khan
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Law
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Jamdar
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S R Smith
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Sampat
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - M Manu
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - N S Malik
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - J Chang
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - M Lewis
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G P Roberts
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - B Karavadra
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Photi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - J Hornsby
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - K Seymour
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Robinson
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Hawkins
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Bawa
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - A Reid
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Wood
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J G Finch
- Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
| | - J Parmar
- Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | - A Al-Muhktar
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Peterson
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Majeed
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - A Choy
- Peterborough City Hospital
| | | | - N Pore
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - C Taylor
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Tate
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - V Vijay
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | - S Sinha
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | - S Khan
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | - A A Hussain
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - N Kansal
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Fasih
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Jackson
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Gurung
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust
| | - G Tsavellas
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Basynat
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - S Basu
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - M Rabie
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Akhtar
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Kumar
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - N Hussain
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Raza
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Haque
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - I Alam
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - R Aseem
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - S Patel
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - M Asad
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - M I Booth
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | - W R Ball
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - J Varghase
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Lodhia
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Bradley
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Rengifo
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Lindsay
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | - A Awan
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Ahmed
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Leeder
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - D Hou
- Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - F Noble
- Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - R Date
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M R Hossack
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Y Li Goh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Turner
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Shetty
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - S R Preston
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J R Hoban
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D J Puntis
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S V Williams
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - J Batt
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
| | - M Doe
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - C Hall
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Carty
- Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust
| | - J Ahmed
- Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - H Lennon
- Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust
| | - C Hindley
- Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust
| | - M Reddy
- St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - R Kenny
- St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - K Hancorn
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - A Hargreaves
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - P Ziprin
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | - G Yeldham
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - E Read
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - M A Khan
- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - A Hussain
- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Ali
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Kanakala
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Ali
- Tunbridge Wells and Maidstone NHS Trust
| | - R Lane
- Tunbridge Wells and Maidstone NHS Trust
| | | | | | - D Mirza
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Puig
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Al Amari
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Vijayan
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R Sutcliffe
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Z Hamady
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - A R Prasad
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - A Patel
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - D Durkin
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - P Kaur
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - L Bowen
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - J P Byrne
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K L Pearson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T G Delisle
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Davies
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - A Macdonald
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Nicholson
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Newton
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Mbuvi
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Farooq
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - Z Zafrani
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - D Brett
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - J Barnes
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Cheung
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Wadley
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - E Hamilton
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - S Jaunoo
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - R Padwick
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - M Sayegh
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R C Newton
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Hebbar
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S F Farag
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - C Blane
- Yeovil District Hospital NHS Trust
| | - M Giles
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M B Peter
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N A Hirst
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Hossain
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Pannu
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - G W Taylor
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - T Diamond
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - P Davey
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - C Jones
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - J M Clements
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - R Digney
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - W M Chan
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S McCain
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S Gull
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - A Janeczko
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - E Dorrian
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - A Harris
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S Dawson
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - D Johnston
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - B McAree
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P Burke
- University Hospital Limerick
| | | | - A D K Hill
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - E Khogali
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - W Shabo
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - E Iskandar
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P Balfe
- St Luke's General Hospital Kilkenny
| | - M Lee
- St Luke's General Hospital Kilkenny
| | - D C Winter
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - M E Kelly
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - E Hoti
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - D Maguire
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - P Karunakaran
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - J G Geoghegan
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - S T Martin
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - F McDermott
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Gibson
- Crosshouse Hospital, Ayrshire and Arran
| | | | - D G Vass
- Crosshouse Hospital, Ayrshire and Arran
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H C C Lim
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - D Duke
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - T Ahmed
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - W D Beasley
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | | | - G Maharaj
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - C Malcolm
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | | | | | | | - R Radwan
- Morriston and Singleton Hospitals
| | | | - S Wood
- Princess of Wales Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
About 25% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases after resection of the primary tumor, and surgical resection of the metastases offers the only opportunity for long-term survival. However, only 20% of patients present with resectable disease. Deciding which patients should be offered surgery, and which should receive additional treatment in the form of perioperative chemotherapy, is complex. For the majority of patients who present with technically irresectable liver-limited disease, systemic downsizing chemotherapy offers the only opportunity to reach surgery and potential cure. Molecular analysis of tumor tissue is improving patient stratification, allowing more appropriate treatment selection, but is not yet a regular part of clinical practice. Decision making is limited by a lack of clear prospective evidence, and so multidisciplinary team assessment is essential to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom; .,School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom;
| | - Graeme J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jones RP, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW, Terlizzo M, O'Grady E, Stremitzer S, Gruenberger T, Rees M, Plant G, Figueras J, Albiol M, Adam R, Awad S, Poston GJ. PARAGON II - A single arm multicentre phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy using irinotecan bead in patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1866-1872. [PMID: 27561844 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative chemotherapy confers a 3-year progression free survival advantage following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), but is associated with significant toxicity. Chemoembolisation using drug eluting PVA microspheres loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) allows sustained delivery of drug directly to tumour, maximising response whilst minimising systemic exposure. This phase II single arm study examined the safety and feasibility of DEBIRI before resection of CRLM. METHODS Patients with resectable CRLM received lobar DEBIRI 1 month prior to surgery, with a radiological endpoint of near stasis. The trial had a primary end-point of tumour resectability (R0 resection). Secondary end-points included safety, pathologic tumour response and overall survival. RESULTS 40 patients received DEBIRI, with a median dose of 103 mg irinotecan (range 64-175 mg). Morbidity was low (2.5%, CTCAE grade 2) with no evidence of systemic chemotoxicity. All patients proceeded to surgery, with 38 undergoing resection (95%, R0 resection rate 74%). 30-day post-operative mortality was 5% (n = 2), with neither death TACE related. 66 lesions were resected, with histologic major or complete pathologic response seen in 77.3% of targeted lesions. At median follow up of 40.6 months, 12 patients (34.3%) had died of recurrent disease with a median overall survival of 50.9 months. Nominal 1, 3 and 5-year OS was 93, 78 & 49% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Resection after neoadjuvant DEBIRI for CRLM is feasible and safe. Single treatment with DEBIRI resulted in tumour pathologic response and median overall survival comparable to that seen after systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00844233).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| | - H Z Malik
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - S W Fenwick
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Terlizzo
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - E O'Grady
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - M Rees
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - G Plant
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - J Figueras
- Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques de Girona (IdIBGi), Girona, Spain
| | - M Albiol
- Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques de Girona (IdIBGi), Girona, Spain
| | - R Adam
- Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Unité Inserm U935, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - S Awad
- Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Unité Inserm U935, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - G J Poston
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sison-Young RL, Lauschke VM, Johann E, Alexandre E, Antherieu S, Aerts H, Gerets HHJ, Labbe G, Hoët D, Dorau M, Schofield CA, Lovatt CA, Holder JC, Stahl SH, Richert L, Kitteringham NR, Jones RP, Elmasry M, Weaver RJ, Hewitt PG, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Goldring CE, Park BK. A multicenter assessment of single-cell models aligned to standard measures of cell health for prediction of acute hepatotoxicity. Arch Toxicol 2016; 91:1385-1400. [PMID: 27344343 PMCID: PMC5316403 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1745-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Assessing the potential of a new drug to cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. We therefore determined whether cell models currently used in safety assessment (HepG2, HepaRG, Upcyte and primary human hepatocytes in conjunction with basic but commonly used endpoints) are actually able to distinguish between novel chemical entities (NCEs) with respect to their potential to cause DILI. A panel of thirteen compounds (nine DILI implicated and four non-DILI implicated in man) were selected for our study, which was conducted, for the first time, across multiple laboratories. None of the cell models could distinguish faithfully between DILI and non-DILI compounds. Only when nominal in vitro concentrations were adjusted for in vivo exposure levels were primary human hepatocytes (PHH) found to be the most accurate cell model, closely followed by HepG2. From a practical perspective, this study revealed significant inter-laboratory variation in the response of PHH, HepG2 and Upcyte cells, but not HepaRG cells. This variation was also observed to be compound dependent. Interestingly, differences between donors (hepatocytes), clones (HepG2) and the effect of cryopreservation (HepaRG and hepatocytes) were less important than differences between the cell models per se. In summary, these results demonstrate that basic cell health endpoints will not predict hepatotoxic risk in simple hepatic cells in the absence of pharmacokinetic data and that a multicenter assessment of more sophisticated signals of molecular initiating events is required to determine whether these cells can be incorporated in early safety assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowena L Sison-Young
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Volker M Lauschke
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Esther Johann
- Early Non-Clinical Safety, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | - Hélène Aerts
- Biologie Servier, 905 Rue de Saran, 45520, Gidy, France
| | - Helga H J Gerets
- UCB BioPharma SPRL, Non-Clinical Development, Chemin du Foriest, 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium
| | - Gilles Labbe
- Sanofi-Aventis Recherche and Développement, Drug Safety Evaluation, Alfortville, France
| | - Delphine Hoët
- Sanofi-Aventis Recherche and Développement, Drug Safety Evaluation, Alfortville, France
| | - Martina Dorau
- Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, R&D DSAR, Preclinical Safety FF, Industriepark Hoechst, Building H823, Room 104, 65926, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Cerys A Lovatt
- GSK, David Jack Centre for R&D, Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0DP, UK
| | - Julie C Holder
- GSK, David Jack Centre for R&D, Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0DP, UK
| | - Simone H Stahl
- AstraZeneca, Innovative Medicines and Early Development, Drug Safety and Metabolism, ADME Transporters, Unit 310 - Darwin Building, Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0FZ, UK
| | - Lysiane Richert
- KaLy-Cell, 20A rue du Général Leclerc, 67115, Plobsheim, France.,Université de Franche-Comté, EA 4267, 25030, Besançon, France
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.,North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Mohamed Elmasry
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.,North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | | | - Philip G Hewitt
- Early Non-Clinical Safety, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chris E Goldring
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
| | - B Kevin Park
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Heslop JA, Rowe C, Walsh J, Sison-Young R, Jenkins R, Kamalian L, Kia R, Hay D, Jones RP, Malik HZ, Fenwick S, Chadwick AE, Mills J, Kitteringham NR, Goldring CEP, Kevin Park B. Mechanistic evaluation of primary human hepatocyte culture using global proteomic analysis reveals a selective dedifferentiation profile. Arch Toxicol 2016; 91:439-452. [PMID: 27039104 PMCID: PMC5225178 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1694-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The application of primary human hepatocytes following isolation from human tissue is well accepted to be compromised by the process of dedifferentiation. This phenomenon reduces many unique hepatocyte functions, limiting their use in drug disposition and toxicity assessment. The aetiology of dedifferentiation has not been well defined, and further understanding of the process would allow the development of novel strategies for sustaining the hepatocyte phenotype in culture or for improving protocols for maturation of hepatocytes generated from stem cells. We have therefore carried out the first proteomic comparison of primary human hepatocyte differentiation. Cells were cultured for 0, 24, 72 and 168 h as a monolayer in order to permit unrestricted hepatocyte dedifferentiation, so as to reveal the causative signalling pathways and factors in this process, by pathway analysis. A total of 3430 proteins were identified with a false detection rate of <1 %, of which 1117 were quantified at every time point. Increasing numbers of significantly differentially expressed proteins compared with the freshly isolated cells were observed at 24 h (40 proteins), 72 h (118 proteins) and 168 h (272 proteins) (p < 0.05). In particular, cytochromes P450 and mitochondrial proteins underwent major changes, confirmed by functional studies and investigated by pathway analysis. We report the key factors and pathways which underlie the loss of hepatic phenotype in vitro, particularly those driving the large-scale and selective remodelling of the mitochondrial and metabolic proteomes. In summary, these findings expand the current understanding of dedifferentiation should facilitate further development of simple and complex hepatic culture systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Heslop
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Cliff Rowe
- CN Bio, Centre for Innovation and Enterprise, Oxford University Begbroke Science Park, Begbroke, Oxfordshire, OX5 1PF, UK
| | - Joanne Walsh
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Rowena Sison-Young
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Roz Jenkins
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Laleh Kamalian
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Richard Kia
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - David Hay
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Stephen Fenwick
- University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Amy E Chadwick
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - John Mills
- AstraZeneca, Personalised Healthcare and Biomarkers, Alderley Park, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, UK
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| | - Chris E P Goldring
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
| | - B Kevin Park
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The Institute of Translational Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dunne DFJ, Jack S, Jones RP, Jones L, Lythgoe DT, Malik HZ, Poston GJ, Palmer DH, Fenwick SW. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection. Br J Surg 2016; 103:504-12. [PMID: 26864728 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Revised: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with low fitness as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) have higher mortality and morbidity after surgery. Preoperative exercise intervention, or prehabilitation, has been suggested as a method to improve CPET values and outcomes. This trial sought to assess the capacity of a 4-week supervised exercise programme to improve fitness before liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS This was a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a 4-week (12 sessions) high-intensity cycle, interval training programme in patients undergoing elective liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. The primary endpoint was oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold. Secondary endpoints included other CPET values and preoperative quality of life (QoL) assessed using the SF-36®. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were randomized (20 to prehabilitation, 18 to standard care), and 35 (25 men and 10 women) completed both preoperative assessments and were analysed. The median age was 62 (i.q.r. 54-69) years, and there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehabilitation led to improvements in preoperative oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (+1·5 (95 per cent c.i. 0·2 to 2·9) ml per kg per min) and peak exercise (+2·0 (0·0 to 4·0) ml per kg per min). The oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake per heart beat) at the anaerobic threshold improved (+0·9 (0·0 to 1·8) ml/beat), and a higher peak work rate (+13 (4 to 22) W) was achieved. This was associated with improved preoperative QoL, with the overall SF-36® score increasing by 11 (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 21) (P = 0·028) and the overall SF-36® mental health score by 11 (1 to 22) (P = 0·037). CONCLUSION A 4-week prehabilitation programme can deliver improvements in CPET scores and QoL before liver resection. This may impact on perioperative outcome. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01523353 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F J Dunne
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - S Jack
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - R P Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - L Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - D T Lythgoe
- Cancer Research UK, Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, Liverpool, UK
| | - H Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - G J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Palmer
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK
| | - S W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones RP, Poston GJ. Decision Making Around Optimal Management of Liver-Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:353-4. [PMID: 26631387 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5002-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. .,Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is an important skill for both gastroenterologists and general surgeons but concerns have been raised about the provision and delivery of training. This survey aimed to evaluate and compare the delivery of endoscopy training to gastroenterology and surgical trainees in the UK. METHODS A nationwide electronic survey was carried out of UK gastroenterology and general surgery trainees. RESULTS There were 216 responses (33% gastroenterologists, 67% surgeons). Gastroenterology trainees attended more non-training endoscopy lists (mean: 3.0 vs 1.2) and training lists than surgical trainees (mean: 0.9 vs 0.5). A significantly higher proportion of gastroenterologists had already achieved accreditation in gastroscopy (60.8% vs 28.9%), colonoscopy (66.7% vs 1.4%) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (33.3% vs 3.0%). More gastroenterology trainees aspired to achieve accreditation in gastroscopy (97.2% vs 79.2%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (91.7% vs 70.1%) and colonoscopy (88.8% vs 55.5%) by completion of training. By completion of training, surgeons were less likely than gastroenterologists to have completed the required number of procedures to gain accreditation in gastroscopy (60.3% vs 91.3%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (64.6% vs 68.6%) and colonoscopy (60.3% vs 70.3%). CONCLUSIONS This survey highlights marked disparities between surgical and gastroenterology trainees in both aiming for and achieving accreditation in endoscopy. Without changes to the delivery and provision of training as well as clarification of the role of endoscopy training in a surgical training programme, future surgeons will not be able to perform essential endoscopic assessment of patients as part of their management algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Jones
- Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons Trainees' Committee , UK
| | | | - A G Robertson
- Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons Trainees' Committee , UK
| | - V S K Yip
- Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons Trainees' Committee , UK
| | - G Chadwick
- British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees' Committee , UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jones RP, Bird NTE, Smith RA, Palmer DH, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ. Prognostic molecular markers in resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis of immunohistochemically detected biomarkers. Biomark Med 2015. [PMID: 26223884 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.15.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Better prognostic information for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma could guide treatment strategies and potentially improve outcome. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify prognostic biomarkers for further investigation. METHODS Relevant literature was identified using Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science. Primary end point was overall survival assessed on univariate analysis. Log hazard ratio and variance were calculated and pooled using a random effects inverse variance approach. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies, including 2371 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Subsequently nine biomarkers predictive of OS were identified (HR, 95% CI): VEGF (2.32, 1.57-3.44), COX-2 (1.94, 1.01-3.71), GLUT-1 (2.09, 1.52-2.89), Cyclin D1 (1.96, 1.02-3.76), p16 (0.68, 0.47-0.98), p27 (0.48, 0.3-0.78), E-Cadherin (0.47, 0.35-0.63), Fascin (2.19, 1.35-3.55), and Ki-67 (1.69, 1.02-2.79). CONCLUSION Meta-analysis has identified a number of prognostic biomarkers for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. These markers warrant further investigation as potential therapeutic targets and validation in a prospective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZK, UK.,Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Nicholas T E Bird
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Richard A Smith
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZK, UK.,Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Steven W Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme J Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sison-Young RLC, Mitsa D, Jenkins RE, Mottram D, Alexandre E, Richert L, Aerts H, Weaver RJ, Jones RP, Johann E, Hewitt PG, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Goldring CEP, Kitteringham NR, Park BK. Comparative Proteomic Characterization of 4 Human Liver-Derived Single Cell Culture Models Reveals Significant Variation in the Capacity for Drug Disposition, Bioactivation, and Detoxication. Toxicol Sci 2015; 147:412-24. [PMID: 26160117 PMCID: PMC4583060 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In vitro preclinical models for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are usually based on cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes (cPHH) or human hepatic tumor-derived cell lines; however, it is unclear how well such cell models reflect the normal function of liver cells. The physiological, pharmacological, and toxicological phenotyping of available cell-based systems is necessary in order to decide the testing purpose for which they are fit. We have therefore undertaken a global proteomic analysis of 3 human-derived hepatic cell lines (HepG2, Upcyte, and HepaRG) in comparison with cPHH with a focus on drug metabolizing enzymes and transport proteins (DMETs), as well as Nrf2-regulated proteins. In total, 4946 proteins were identified, of which 2722 proteins were common across all cell models, including 128 DMETs. Approximately 90% reduction in expression of cytochromes P450 was observed in HepG2 and Upcyte cells, and approximately 60% in HepaRG cells relative to cPHH. Drug transporter expression was also lower compared with cPHH with the exception of MRP3 and P-gp (MDR1) which appeared to be significantly expressed in HepaRG cells. In contrast, a high proportion of Nrf2-regulated proteins were more highly expressed in the cell lines compared with cPHH. The proteomic database derived here will provide a rational basis for the context-specific selection of the most appropriate ‘hepatocyte-like’ cell for the evaluation of particular cellular functions associated with DILI and, at the same time, assist in the construction of a testing paradigm which takes into account the in vivo disposition of a new drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowena L C Sison-Young
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - Dimitra Mitsa
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - Rosalind E Jenkins
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - David Mottram
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | | | | | - Hélène Aerts
- Biologie Servier, 905 Route de Saran, 45520, Gidy, France
| | | | - Robert P Jones
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - Esther Johann
- North Western Hepatobiliary Unit, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Philip G Hewitt
- Merck KGaA, Merck Serono, Non-Clinical Safety, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany; and
| | - Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
- Section of Pharmacogenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christopher E P Goldring
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK;
| | - B Kevin Park
- *Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jones RP, McWhirter D, Fretwell VL, McAvoy A, Hardman JG. Clinical follow-up does not improve survival after resection of stage I-III colorectal cancer: A cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 17:67-71. [PMID: 25827817 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 02/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The benefit of clinical follow-up alongside CT & CEA in detecting recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. Despite this, clinical review remains part of most surveillance protocols. This study assessed the efficacy of clinical follow-up in addition to CT/CEA in detecting disease recurrence. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for CRC at a single centre between 2009 and 2011 were identified. Follow-up included clinical review, CT and CEA for 5 years. The primary endpoint of the study was method of detection of recurrence. Secondary endpoints included detection of surgically treatable recurrence, compliance with follow-up, disease free survival and overall survival. RESULTS 118 patients with stage I-III CRC were included. Only 68.9% of scheduled follow-up events were performed (76.6% clinical reviews, 76.2% CT scans and 60.4% CEA tests). At median follow-up of 36 months, 26 patients had developed recurrence (median DFS 45.8 months). 17 patients (14.7%) had died (median OS 49.3 months). Sensitivity and specificity of follow up modality in detecting recurrence were; CT (92.3%, 100%), CEA (57.7%, 100%), clinical review (23.0%, 27.2%). Addition of clinical review did not identify any disease recurrence that was not detected by scheduled CT. Eight patients (30.7%) had surgically treatable recurrence - all were identified by scheduled CT. CONCLUSION The addition of CEA testing and clinical review to scheduled CT scanning offered no benefit in the detection of recurrent disease. Clinical review could be removed from follow-up protocols without any reduction in the detection of recurrent cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Jones
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK.
| | - D McWhirter
- School of Cancer Studies, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| | - V L Fretwell
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| | - A McAvoy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| | - J G Hardman
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mid Cheshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sutton PA, Jones RP, Morrison F, Goldring CE, Park BK, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Vimalachandran D, Kitteringham NR. Evaluation of a novel tissue stabilization gel to facilitate clinical sampling for translational research in surgical trials. Br J Surg 2015; 102:e124-32. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2014] [Revised: 08/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim was to establish the feasibility of using a tissue stabilization gel (Allprotect™) as an alternative to liquid nitrogen to facilitate collection of clinical samples for translational research.
Methods
Tumour samples from patients undergoing surgery for primary or metastatic colorectal cancer were either snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen or stored in Allprotect™ under a number of different conditions. Sample integrity was compared across different storage conditions by assessing biomolecule stability and function. DNA quality was assessed spectrophotometrically and by KRas genotyping by pyrosequencing. Total RNA retrieval was determined by nanodrop indices/RNA integrity numbers, and quality assessed by reverse transcription–PCR for two representative genes (high-mobility group box 1, HMGB1; carboxylesterase 1, CES1) and two microRNAs (miR122 and let7d). Western blot analysis of HMGB1 and CES1 was used to confirm protein expression, and the metabolic conversion of irinotecan to its active metabolite, SN-38, was used to assess function.
Results
Under short-term storage conditions (up to 1 week) there was no apparent difference in quality between samples stored in Allprotect™ and those snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Some RNA degradation became apparent in tissue archived in Allprotect™ after 1 week, and protein degradation after 2 weeks.
Conclusion
In hospitals that do not have access to liquid nitrogen and –80°C freezers, Allprotect™ provides a suitable alternative for the acquisition and stabilization of clinical samples. Storage proved satisfactory for up to 1 week, allowing transfer of samples without the need for specialized facilities. Surgical relevanceAccess to clinical material is a fundamental component of translational research that requires significant infrastructure (research personnel, liquid nitrogen, specialized storage facilities). The aim was to evaluate a new-to-market tissue stabilization gel (Allprotect™), which offers a simple solution to tissue preservation without the need for complex infrastructure.Allprotect™ offers comparable DNA, RNA and protein stabilization to tissue snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for up to 1 week. Degradation of biomolecules beyond this highlights its role as a short-term tissue preservative.Allprotect™ has the potential to increase surgeon participation in translational research and surgical trials requiring tissue collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Sutton
- Cancer Research UK Centre, UK
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
- Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
| | - R P Jones
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - F Morrison
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - C E Goldring
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - B K Park
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Palmer
- Cancer Research UK Centre, UK
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - H Z Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - N R Kitteringham
- Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dunne DFJ, Jones RP, Lythgoe DT, Pilkington FJ, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Poston GJ, Lacasia C, Jack S, Fenwick SW. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing before liver surgery. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110:439-44. [PMID: 24894657 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) assessed "poorer" fitness correlates with poorer outcomes in blinded studies. Whether this correlation will persist when CPET is utilized to stratify care as part of a multi-modal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is unclear. This study examined whether CPET variables were associated with postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing hepatectomy within an ERAS program. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing elective hepatectomy between October 2009 and April 2011. The relationships between CPET derived variables; postoperative complications and length of stay were investigated. RESULTS Of 267 patients undergoing surgery, 197 had undergone standard cycle ergometer CPET. The relative oxygen uptake [VO2 (ml kg(-1) min(-1))] and ventilatory equivalent of CO2 (VE/VCO2) at the anaerobic threshold (AT) were not associated with complications or length of stay. Greater absolute oxygen uptake at AT [VO2 at AT (L min(-1) )] was associated with early hospital discharge [OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.18-3.96), P = 0.013] on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS When CPET is used to delineate perioperative management a low relative oxygen uptake [VO2 (ml kg(-1) min(-1) )] at the AT does not place patients at significantly higher risk of postoperative complications. This suggests CPET assessed "poor" fitness should not be used as a barrier to surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan F J Dunne
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jones RP, Hamann S, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Folprecht G. Defined criteria for resectability improves rates of secondary resection after systemic therapy for liver limited metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:1590-601. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|