Analysis of domoic acid and related compounds by mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as N-trifluoroacetyl-O-silyl derivatives

Condensation of the isoprenoid and amino precursors in the biosynthesis of domoic acid

Understanding how environmental signals regulate production of domoic acid in blooms of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. at a molecular level requires description of the biochemical pathway to this kainoid neurotoxin. Precursor feeding studies have suggested domoic acid arises from the condensation of the C(10) isoprenoid geranyl diphosphate with glutamate, but the specific reactions leading to domoic acid from these precursors remain undescribed. Here, we develop a method to derivatize domoic acid with propyl chloroformate that enables gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis to measure incorporation of stable isotopes into domoic acid generated in cultures incubated with isotopically-labeled substrates. We apply this method to demonstrate that both (2)H from [1-(2)H(2)]geraniol are incorporated into domoic acid, suggesting that the condensation of geranyl diphosphate with an amino group occurs by nucleophilic substitution of the diphosphate rather than by oxidation of geraniol to the aldehyde before reaction with an amino group to form an imine. Ultimately, these and similar studies will facilitate the identification of DA biosynthetic enzymes and genes which will enable the study of how environmental factors regulate DA biosynthesis at the molecular level.

The occurrence of domoic acid linked to a toxic diatom bloom in a new potential vector: the tunicate Pyura chilensis (piure)

The tunicate Pyura chilensis (Molina, 1782); Phylum Chordata; Subphylum Urochordata; Class Ascidiacea, common local name "piure" or sea squirt; a filter-feeder (plankton and suspended particles) sessile species; may play an important role in monitoring domoic acid (DA) the principal toxic component of Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP). Significant DA concentrations have been determined in tunicate samples, collected during a recent ASP outbreak in Bahía Inglesa, an important scallop (Argopecten purpuratus) farming area. Several infaunal species were tested for the presence of DA, in addition to the usual scallop monitoring programme. DA was found at sub-toxic levels in filtering bivalves such as mussels (Mytilus chilensis), large mussels (Aulacomya ater) and clams (Protothaca thaca) (6.4, 5.4 and 4.7 microg DA/g tissue respectively). Of particular interest was the observation of significant accumulations of toxic Pseudo-nitzschia sp. diatoms in the internal siphon and atrium spaces of the tunicate. Toxin distribution within major tunicate organs was heterogeneous with 8.7-15.5 microg DA/g in edible tissues, 14.9-17.9 microg DA/g in the fecal material and 13.6-32.7 microg DA/g in the gut content. DA was determined by HPLC-UV and confirmed by diode-array detection and LC-MS/MS analysis. This is the first report of the presence of DA in a tunicate that is regularly consumed by coastal populations. These results confirm the need to include these organisms in sanitation programs for marine toxins.

Amnesic shellfish poison

Amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) is caused by consumption of shellfish that have accumulated domoic acid, a neurotoxin produced by some strains of phytoplankton. The neurotoxic properties of domoic acid result in neuronal degeneration and necrosis in specific regions of the hippocampus. A serious outbreak of ASP occurred in Canada in 1987 and involved 150 reported cases, 19 hospitalisations and 4 deaths after consumption of contaminated mussels. Symptoms ranged from gastrointestinal disturbances, to neurotoxic effects such as hallucinations, memory loss and coma. Monitoring programmes are in place in numerous countries worldwide and closures of shellfish harvesting areas occur when domoic acid concentrations exceed regulatory limits. This paper reviews the chemistry, sources, metabolism and toxicology of domoic acid as well as human case reports of ASP and discusses a possible mechanism of toxicity.

The role of chromatography in the hunt for red tide toxins

An overview is given of the different approaches that have been used to identify toxins responsible for seafood poisoning incidents, to investigate the origins of toxins, and to monitor seafood on a routine basis. It is shown that advancements in our knowledge of toxins and our ability to protect the public have often followed key developments in separation and analysis technologies. Specific examples of research in this field are presented to illustrate the significant role that chromatographic methods play. The presentation will be given in an order that reflects the typical sequence of investigations that follow a new toxin episode.

Determination of domoic acid in shellfish by liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization and multiple tandem mass spectrometry

Amnesic shellfish poisoning is a potentially lethal human toxic syndrome which is caused by domoic acid (DA) that originates in marine phytoplankton belonging to the Pseudonitzschia genus. A new sensitive liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method has been developed for the determination of DA in various marine biological samples. The characteristic fragmentation pathways for DA were established using multiple stage MS on selected daughter ions, which were sequentially trapped and fragmented. Chromatography was performed using a gradient of acetonitrile-water (5:95 to 40:60), containing trifluoroacetic acid (0.05%), over 25 min at 0.2 ml/min with a C18 column (Luna-2, 150 x 2.0 mm, 5 microm). Using electrospray ionisation, multiple tandem MS experiments were performed with an ion-trap mass spectrometer (Finnigan MAT LCQ). The protonated DA molecule was the precursor ion, m/z 312, and the relative collision energies were optimised for multiple MS (MS(n), n = 2-4) studies. LC-MS3 using the ions, m/z 266 and 220, from the loss of two HCOOH molecules, produced the best sensitivity data. Calibration data for various MS modes were: MS (0.05-10 microg DA/ml, r2 = 0.9973); MS2 (0.025-10 microg DA/ml, r2=0.9997); MS3 (0.025-10 microg DA/ml, 0.9994). The detection limits (3:1 signal:noise) were better than 0.02 microg DA/ml for LC-MS, 0.014 microg DA/ml for LC-MS2 and 0.008 microg DA/ml for LC-MS3. This method was applied to determine DA in scallop (Pecten maximus) tissues, which subsequently led to the closure of several shellfish harvesting sites on the west coast of Ireland.

Analysis of domoic acid in shellfish by thin-layer chromatography

A thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method has been developed for the semi-quantitative analysis of domoic acid (DA) in shellfish tissues. Tissues were extracted in a single-step homogenization of tissue with 50 % aqueous methanol and then taken through a selective strong anion exchange cleanup. Cleaned extracts were applied directly to silica gel TLC plates and developed with a butanol-acetic acid-water mixture (3:1:1, Rf = 0.45 for DA). As little as 10 microg DA per gram of tissue could be detected after chromatography using a hand-held short-wave UV lamp to detect fluorescence quenching. Confirmation was provided by spraying the plate with ninhydrin, which reacts with the secondary amine of DA to give a distinctive yellow colored product. The extraction, cleanup and TLC procedures are fast and simple, and do not require the use of expensive equipment. This method should prove useful for the routine screening of shellfish tissues in those laboratories not equipped with an LC system. It should also be useful as a chemical confirmation method for DA in samples tested positive by assay methods such as immunoassay.

Aquatic biotoxins: design and implementation of seafood safety monitoring programs

Naturally occurring toxicants are usually odorless, tasteless, and generally undetectable by any simple chemical test. Various programs have been established that are effective in reducing risks associated with these toxicants in food. These programs include setting regulatory limits, monitoring susceptible commodities for toxin levels, and using decontamination procedures. Bioassays have been used traditionally to monitor suspect products. All traditional bioassays, however, have one common disadvantage, i.e., the lack of specificity for individual toxins. The lack of available reference standards for specific toxins has also hampered implementation of monitoring programs. Utilizing the knowledge gained with regulatory monitoring and decontamination programs for other toxins, e.g., aflatoxin, similar seafood safety programs can be developed for aquatic biotoxins that will reduce risks and hazards associated with the contaminant to practicable levels and help to preserve an adequate food supply. Research is needed in several areas identified in this article. International cooperation has an important role in achieving these essential elements. Global programs will help in the adequate management of risks associated with aquatic biotoxins. To have an effective monitoring program, it is necessary to define precisely the local needs for information in a short or long time range. It is necessary to have basic knowledge about the biological, chemical, and physical conditions as well as temporal and geographic variations within the region of interest (2). Regardless of the overall success of fish/shellfish toxin monitoring plans, emergencies will occur. Therefore, contingency plans should be developed so there will be no misunderstanding of what actions to take (148). In general, however, the structure of the program must be kept as simple as possible to facilitate fast and uncomplicated flow of information among the various organizations and individuals involved (2). Public health and safety requires the removal of any toxic shellfish from the market, within practicability, and closure of any suspect harvest area. It should be important to remember that economic value of the fish or shellfish resource is always secondary to public health and safety (148).

Salt clean-up procedure for the determination of domoic acid by HPLC

Domoic acid (DA) was first reported in mussels from Prince Edward Island, Canada, in 1987. It reappeared in anchovies and pelicans from Monterey Bay, California, in 1991. Later that year, domoic acid was found in razor clams and Dungeness crabs along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Since the initial outbreak, a variety of analytical methods for the detection of this neurotoxin have been developed. Here, we describe a modification to the solid phase extraction (SPE) clean-up step in Quilliam's HPLC-UV method (1991: NRCC No. 33001). The standard 10% acetonitrile (MeCN) wash and 0.5M ammonium citrate buffer (ACB) in 10% MeCN (pH = 4.5) eluting solution have been replaced with a 0.1M sodium chloride (NaCl) in 10% MeCN wash and a 0.5M NaCl in 10% MeCN eluting solution. This modification allows the analysis to work equally well on both clam and crab viscera and meat. Chromatograms of visceral samples no longer contain interfering or late eluting peaks; and all chromatograms are free of the large solvent peak tailing associated with the ACB eluent. The newly modified method allows for an improved and more versatile domoic acid analysis.