Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses

The effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on cardiovascular function in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a safety study

Introduction

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is characterized by intense central inflammation, leading to substantial post-hemorrhagic complications such as vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Given the anti-inflammatory effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and its ability to promote brain plasticity, taVNS has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for SAH patients. However, the effects of taVNS on cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients, like those with SAH, have not yet been investigated. Given the association between cardiac complications and elevated risk of poor clinical outcomes after SAH, it is essential to characterize the cardiovascular effects of taVNS to ensure this approach is safe in this fragile population. Therefore, we assessed the impact of both acute taVNS and repetitive taVNS on cardiovascular function in this study.

Methods

In this randomized clinical trial, 24 SAH patients were assigned to either a taVNS treatment or a Sham treatment group. During their stay in the intensive care unit, we monitored patient electrocardiogram (ECG) readings and vital signs. We compared long-term changes in heart rate, heart rate variability, QT interval, and blood pressure between the two groups. Additionally, we assessed the effects of acute taVNS by comparing cardiovascular metrics before, during, and after the intervention. We also explored acute cardiovascular biomarkers in patients exhibiting clinical improvement.

Results

We found that repetitive taVNS did not significantly alter heart rate, QT interval, blood pressure, or intracranial pressure. However, taVNS increased overall heart rate variability and parasympathetic activity compared to the sham treatment. The increase in parasympathetic activity was most pronounced from 2-4 days after initial treatment (Cohen's d = 0.50). Acutely, taVNS increased heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral perfusion index without affecting the corrected QT interval, intracranial pressure, or heart rate variability. The acute post-treatment elevation in heart rate was more pronounced in patients who experienced a decrease of more than one point in their Modified Rankin Score at the time of discharge.

Conclusions

Our study found that taVNS treatment did not induce adverse cardiovascular effects, such as bradycardia or QT prolongation, supporting its development as a safe immunomodulatory treatment approach for SAH patients. The observed acute increase in heart rate after taVNS treatment may serve as a biomarker for SAH patients who could derive greater benefit from this treatment.

Trial registration

NCT04557618.

Effectiveness of bimodal stimulation of the auditory-somatosensory system in the treatment of tonal tinnitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) is the interaction site of auditory and somatosensory system inputs. According to the stochastic resonance theory, hearing loss increases the neural activity of the somatosensory system in the DCN and causes tinnitus. it is possible to modulate this neural hyperactivity by applying random noise through the auditory and somatosensory systems (bimodal stimulation). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the bimodal intervention based on the theory of stochastic resonance.

METHODS

The study divided 34 participants into unimodal and bimodal groups with 17 subjects in each. The bimodal group received customized acoustic stimulation along with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tAVNS) and the unimodal group received customized acoustic stimulation along with tAVNS as a sham. The treatment sessions in both groups were 6 sessions and each session lasted for 20 min. The participants were evaluated before, immediately after, and one month after the completion of the intervention sessions, using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire and the mismatch negativity (MMN) test.

RESULTS

After the intervention sessions, the results indicated a statistically significant decrease in THI scores and a significant increase in the MMN amplitude in the bimodal group compared to the unimodal group. No significant changes in MMN latency were observed between the two groups. These changes were stable in the one-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that bimodal stimulation is a better intervention option compared to unimodal stimulation. Bimodal stimulation may be an effective intervention method for some subjects with tinnitus, especially people with hearing loss who have tonal tinnitus.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation can modulate fronto-parietal brain networks

Objective

Recent studies have shown that transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) holds promise as a treatment for neurological or psychiatric disease through the ability to modulate neural activity in some brain regions without an invasive procedure. The objective of this study was to identify the neural correlates underlying the effects of tVNS.

Methods

Twenty right-handed healthy subjects with normal hearing participated in this study. An auricle-applied tVNS device (Soricle, Neurive Co., Ltd., Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea) was used to administer tVNS stimulation. A session consisted of 14 blocks, including 7 blocks of tVNS stimulation or sham stimulation and 7 blocks of rest, and lasted approximately 7 min (1 block = 30 s). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed during the stimulation.

Results

No activated regions were observed in the fMRI scans following both sham stimulation and tVNS after the first session. After the second session, tVNS activated two clusters of brain regions in the right frontal gyrus. A comparison of the activated regions after the second session of each stimulation revealed that the fMRI following tVNS exhibited four surviving clusters. Additionally, four clusters were activated in the overall stimulated area during both the first and second sessions. When comparing the fMRI results after each type of stimulation, the fMRI following tVNS showed four surviving clusters compared to the fMRI after sham stimulation.

Conclusion

tVNS could stimulate some brain regions, including the fronto-parietal network. Stimulating these regions for treating neurological or psychiatric disease might require applying tVNS for at least 3.5 min.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to acutely reduce emotional vulnerability and improve emotional regulation in borderline personality disorder (tVNS-BPD): study protocol for a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is considered a disorder of emotion regulation resulting from the expression of a biologically determined emotional vulnerability (that is, heightened sensitivity to emotion, increased emotional intensity/reactivity, and a slow return to emotional baseline) combined with exposure to invalidating environments. Vagal tone has been associated with activity in cortical regions involved in emotion regulation and a lower resting state of vagal tone has been observed in BPD patients relative to healthy controls. Non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been shown to reduce temper outbursts in adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome, to enhance recognition of emotions in healthy students, and to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Furthermore, a single session of taVNS has been shown to acutely alter the recognition of facial expressions of negative valence in adolescents with MDD and increase emotion recognition in controls. However, the effect of taVNS on emotional vulnerability and regulation in individuals diagnosed with BPD has not been investigated. Our aims are to determine if taVNS is effective in acutely reducing emotional vulnerability and improve emotional regulation in BPD patients.

METHODS

Forty-two patients will be randomized to a single session of taVNS or sham-taVNS while going through an affect induction procedure. It will consist of the presentation of one neutral and three negative affect-evoking 4-min-long videos in sequence, each of which is followed by a 4-min post-induction period during which participants will rate the quality and intensity of their current self-reported emotions (post-induction ratings) and the perceived effectiveness in managing their emotions during the video presentation. The rating of the current self-reported emotions will be repeated after every post-induction period (recovery ratings). Mixed models with individuals as random effect will be used to investigate the ratings at each stage of the study, taking into account the repeated measures of the same individuals at baseline, pre-induction, post-induction, and recovery.

DISCUSSION

The study has potential to yield new insights into the role of vagal tone in emotion dysregulation in BPD and offer preliminary data on the effectiveness of taVNS as a possible non-invasive brain stimulation to treat a core symptom of BPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05892900. Retrospectively registered on Jun 07, 2023.

Closed-loop transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the improvement of upper extremity motor function in stroke patients: a study protocol

Background

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has garnered attention for stroke rehabilitation, with studies demonstrating its benefits when combined with motor rehabilitative training or delivered before motor training. The necessity of concurrently applying taVNS with motor training for post-stroke motor rehabilitation remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the necessity and advantages of applying the taVNS concurrently with motor training by an electromyography (EMG)-triggered closed-loop system for post-stroke rehabilitation.

Methods

We propose a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving 150 stroke patients assigned to one of three groups: concurrent taVNS, sequential taVNS, or sham control condition. In the concurrent group, taVNS bursts will synchronize with upper extremity motor movements with EMG-triggered closed-loop system during the rehabilitative training, while in the sequential group, a taVNS session will precede the motor rehabilitative training. TaVNS intensity will be set below the pain threshold for both concurrent and sequential conditions and at zero for the control condition. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary measures include standard upper limb function assessments, as well as EMG and electrocardiogram (ECG) features.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, affiliated with Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University for Clinical Studies (2023-QX-012-01). This study has been registered on ClinicalTrials (NCT05943431). Signed informed consent will be obtained from all included participants. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings.

Discussion

This study represents a pioneering effort in directly comparing the impact of concurrent taVNS with motor training to that of sequential taVNS with motor training on stroke rehabilitation. Secondly, the incorporation of an EMG-triggered closed-loop taVNS system has enabled the automation and individualization of both taVNS and diverse motor training tasks-a novel approach not explored in previous research. This technological advancement holds promise for delivering more precise and tailored training interventions for stroke patients. However, it is essential to acknowledge a limitation of this study, as it does not delve into examining the neural mechanisms underlying taVNS in the context of post-stroke rehabilitation.

No consistent evidence for the anti-inflammatory effect of vagus nerve stimulation in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been identified as an innovative immunosuppressive treatment strategy in rodent studies. However, its' clinical potential is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether VNS can reduce inflammatory proteins and/or immune cells in humans, through a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases Cochrane, Pubmed and World of Knowledge were searched in duplicate up to the 3rd of March 2022 and publications from identified clinical trial registrations were identified until 20th of August 2023. Studies were included if they provided peer-reviewed data for humans who received VNS as short-term (<=1 day) or long-term (>=2 days-365 days) stimulation and reported at least one cytokine or immune cell after treatment.Screening of title, abstract, full text, and data extraction was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and meta-regression was performed for moderating factors. Reporting bias was assessed. The standardized mean difference (Hedge's g) was used to indicate overall differences of cytokine data (mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range at the study level) to test our a-priori hypothesis. The systematic review of 36 studies with 1135 participants (355 receiving a control/sham condition and 780 receiving VNS) revealed anti-inflammatory effects of VNS for cytokines in several reports, albeit often in subgroup analyses, but our meta-analyses of 26 studies did not confirm these findings. Although most cytokines were numerically reduced, the reduction did not reach statistical significance after VNS: not in the between-group comparisons (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.21, p = 0.359; IL-6: g = -0.94, p = 0.112; long-term: TNF-α: g = -0.13, p = 0.196; IL-6: g = -0.67, p = 0.306); nor in the within-study designs (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.45, p = 0.630; IL-6: g = 0.28, p = 0.840; TNF-α: g = -0.53, p = 0.297; IL-6:g = -0.02, p = 0.954). Only the subgroup analysis of 4 long-term studies with acute inflammation was significant: VNS decreased CRP significantly more than sham stimulation. Additional subgroup analyses including stimulation duration, stimulation method (invasive/non-invasive), immune stimulation, and study quality did not alter results. However, heterogeneity was high, and most studies had poor to fair quality. Given the low number of studies for each disease, a disease-specific analysis was not possible. In conclusion, while numeric effects were reported in individual studies, the current evidence does not substantiate the claim that VNS impacts inflammatory cytokines in humans. However, it may be beneficial during acute inflammatory events. To assess its full potential, high-quality studies and technological advances are required.

Clinical Research Progress of the Post-Stroke Upper Limb Motor Function Improvement via Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Stroke is a disease with high morbidity and disability, and motor impairment is a common sequela of stroke. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a type of non-invasive stimulation, which can effectively improve post-stroke motor dysfunction. This review discusses stimulation parameters, intervention timing, and the development of innovative devices for taVNS. We further summarize the application of taVNS in improving post-stroke upper limb motor function to further promote the clinical research and application of taVNS in the rehabilitation of post-stroke upper limb motor dysfunction.

The microbiota-gut-brain axis in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory: current state and future challenges

A fundamental shift in neuroscience suggests bidirectional interaction of gut microbiota with the healthy and dysfunctional brain. This microbiota-gut-brain axis has mainly been investigated in stress-related psychopathology (e.g. depression, anxiety). The hippocampus, a key structure in both the healthy brain and psychopathologies, is implicated by work in rodents that suggests gut microbiota substantially impact hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. However, understanding microbiota-hippocampus mechanisms in health and disease, and translation to humans, is hampered by the absence of a coherent evaluative approach. We review the current knowledge regarding four main gut microbiota-hippocampus routes in rodents: through the vagus nerve; via the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal-axis; by metabolism of neuroactive substances; and through modulation of host inflammation. Next, we suggest an approach including testing (biomarkers of) the four routes as a function of the influence of gut microbiota (composition) on hippocampal-dependent (dys)functioning. We argue that such an approach is necessary to proceed from the current state of preclinical research to beneficial application in humans to optimise microbiota-based strategies to treat and enhance hippocampal-dependent memory (dys)functions.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Treatment Protocols and Stimulation Parameters

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has promising therapeutic potential in a wide range of applications across somatic and psychiatric conditions. Compared with invasive vagus nerve stimulation, good safety and tolerability profiles also support the use of tVNS in pediatric patients. Potential neurodevelopment-specific needs, however, raise concerns regarding the age-appropriate adjustment of treatment protocols and applied stimulation parameters.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to review registered trials and published studies to synthesize existing tVNS treatment protocols and stimulation parameters applied in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of electronic data bases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) and ClinicalTrials was conducted. Information on patient and study-level characteristics (eg, clinical condition, sample size), the tVNS device (eg, brand name, manufacturer), stimulation settings (eg, pulse width, stimulation intensity), and stimulation protocol (eg, duration, dosage of stimulation) was extracted.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 15 publications (four study protocols) and 15 registered trials applying tVNS in pediatric patients (<18 years of age). Most of these studies did not exclusively address pediatric patients. None of the studies elaborated on neurodevelopmental aspects or justified the applied protocol or stimulation parameters for use in pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No dedicated pediatric tVNS devices exist. Neither stimulation parameters nor stimulation protocols for tVNS are properly justified in pediatric patients. Evidence on age-dependent stimulation effects of tVNS under a neurodevelopment framework is warranted. We discuss the potential implications of these findings with clinical relevance, address some of the challenges of tVNS research in pediatric populations, and point out key aspects in future device development and research in addition to clinical studies on pediatric populations.

Immediate effects and duration of a short and single application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on P300 event related potential

Introduction

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a neuromodulatory technique that stimulates the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. The modulation of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) network is one of the potential working mechanisms of this method. Our aims were 1-to investigate if short and single applications of taVNS can modulate the P300 cognitive event-related potential (ERP) as an indirect marker that reflects NE brain activation under control of the LC, and 2-to evaluate the duration of these changes.

Methods

20 healthy volunteers executed an auditory oddball paradigm to obtain P300 and reaction time (RT) values. Then a 7 min active or sham taVNS period was initiated and simultaneously a new P300 paradigm was performed. We successively repeated the paradigm on 4 occasions with different time intervals up to 56 min after the stimulation onset.

Results

During active taVNS an immediate and significant effect of increasing the amplitude and reducing the latency of P300, as well as a shortening in the RT was observed. This effect was prolonged in time up to 28 min. The values then returned to pre-stimulation levels. Sham stimulation did not generate changes.

Discussion

Our results, demonstrate differential facilitating effects in a concrete time window after taVNS. Literature about the modulatory effect of taVNS over P300 ERP shows a wide spread of results. There is not a standardized system for taVNS and currently the great heterogeneity of stimulation approaches concerning targets and parameters, make it difficult to obtain conclusions about this relationship. Our study was designed optimizing several stimulation settings, such as a customized earbud stimulator, enlarged stimulating surface, simultaneous stimulation over the cymba and cavum conchae, a Delayed Biphasic Pulse Burst and current controlled stimulation that adjusted the output voltage and guaranteed the administration of a preset electrical dose. Under our stimulation conditions, targeting vagal nerve fibers via taVNS modulates the P300 in healthy participants. The optimal settings of modulatory function of taVNS on P300, and their interdependency is insufficiently studied in the literature, but our data provides several easily optimizable parameters, that will produce more robust results in future.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in poststroke cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

As one of the most common stroke sequelae, poststroke cognitive impairment significantly impacts 17.6%-83% of survivors, affecting their rehabilitation, daily living and quality of life. Improving cognitive abilities among patients in stroke recovery is therefore critical and urgent. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TAVNS) is a non-invasive, safe, cost-effective treatment with great potential for improving the cognitive function of poststroke patients. This clinical research will evaluate the effectiveness, and help elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms, of TAVNS for improving poststroke cognitive function.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single-centre, parallel-group, allocation concealment, assessor-blinded randomised controlled clinical trial. We will allocate 88 recruited participants to the TAVNS or sham group for an intervention that will run for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with twice daily sessions lasting 30 min each. Blood tests will be performed and questionnaires issued at baseline and 8-week and 12 week follow-ups. Primary outcomes will be changes in cognitive function scores. Secondary outcomes will be changes in activities of daily living, quality of life and serum oxidative stress indicators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine has approved the protocol (No. HN-LL-YJSLW-2022200). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200057808.

Evaluation of different vagus nerve stimulation anatomical targets in the ear by vagus evoked potential responses

BACKGROUND

Electrical auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging therapy. Stimuli are transported to brainstem nuclei, whereby its multiple projections reach to many subcortical and cortical areas, thus allowing the neuromodulation of several systemic physiological processes. We aim to define the best auricular target for taVNS through vagus somatosensory evoked potential (VSEP) elicited stimulating different auricular areas with different electrode sizes.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects were enrolled. Three stimulation areas were studied: simultaneous cymba and cavum (CC), cymba (C) and earlobe (L); and two electrode sizes: extra-large (X) and small (S). We studied the effect of five combinations (CCX, CCS, CS, LX and LS) on VSEP´s latency and amplitude, and sensory and pain threshold (Pt) using a lineal mixed model regression analysis. We used CS combination, used in a commercial device, as reference model.

RESULTS

Valid VSEP were obtained for CCX, CCS and CS but not in LX and LS. Both CCS and CCX tests showed significant amplitude increases. The same effect was observed in CCX using CCS as reference. Significant increases in Pt were found for CCX and LX. The same effect was observed in CCX using LX as reference.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that CC and C areas are active targets for taVNS but not for earlobe, as anatomical data support. Considering that amplitude reflects the synchronized electrical activity generated, we conclude the most effective topography is the simultaneous stimulation of cymba and concha. The use of X-sized electrodes increases the amplitudes and makes the stimulation more comfortable.