Anatomic position of the asterion in Kenyans for posterolateral surgical approaches to cranial cavity

Sex determination by Ct -scan analysis of the mastoid bone: A cross-sectional study

The mastoid bone, situated at the base of the skull and characterized by its compact structure in the petrous portion, being among the slowest-growing bones, has gained recognition as a valuable anthropological tool for sex determination. Thus, we have proposed to assess the reliability of the mastoid process in sex determination in a Tunisian population using CT-scan analysis. A cross-sectional study was conducted. CT scans forming the mastoid triangle were analyzed using a General Electric Bright Speed scanner. Nine measurements were taken by a single observer, ensuring reliability through intra- and inter-observer assessments. Normalization and statistical analyses, including logistic regression, were applied to identify sex-discriminating variables. The model's performance was evaluated using learning curves, cross-validation, and various metrics. The resulting logistic regression equation, coefficients, and intercept provided a predictive tool for sex determination. A total of 256 cranial CT scans (126 males, 130 females) were analyzed. Our study revealed that the mastoid region approach achieved an overall accuracy of 80.8 % in sex identification within the examined population. The method demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.9 % and specificity of 81.8 %. All investigated variables (AP, PM, AM, CMH, TMH, OSDmax, OCDmax, MA) exhibited discriminatory capabilities for sex determination, except for AIA. Notably, the most effective discriminators were AP, CMH, and OSDmax. Utilizing an ROC curve analysis to optimize mastoid variables for maximum sensitivity and specificity, we obtained excellent results, with an area under the curve reaching 91 %.

A novel theory for rapid localization of the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction and "keyhole" in the retrosigmoid keyhole approach: micro-anatomical study, technique nuances, and clinical application

To determine a rapid and accurate method for locating the keypoint and "keyhole" in the suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach. (1) Twelve adult skull specimens were selected to locate the anatomical landmarks on the external surface of the skull.The line between the infraorbital margin and superior margin of the external acoustic meatus was named the baseline. A coordinate system was established using the baseline and its perpendicular line through the top point of diagastric groove.The perpendicular distance (x), and the horizontal distance (y) between the central point of the "keyhole" and the top point of the digastric groove in that coordinate system were measured. The method was applied to fresh cadaveric specimens and 53 clinical cases to evaluate its application value. (1) x and y were 14.20 ± 2.63 mm and 6.54 ± 1.83 mm, respectively (left) and 14.95 ± 2.53 mm and 6.65 ± 1.61 mm, respectively (right). There was no significant difference between the left and right sides of the skull (P > 0.05). (2) The operative area was satisfactorily exposed in the fresh cadaveric specimens, and no venous sinus injury was observed. (3) In clinical practice, drilling did not cause injury to venous sinuses, the mean diameter of the bone windows was 2.0-2.5 cm, the mean craniotomy time was 26.01 ± 3.46 min, and the transverse and sigmoid sinuses of 47 patients were well-exposed. We propose a "one point, two lines, and two distances" for "keyhole" localization theory, that is we use the baseline between the infraorbital margin and superior margin of the external acoustic meatus and the perpendicular line to the baseline through the top point of the digastric groove to establish a coordinate system. And the drilling point was 14.0 mm above and 6.5 mm behind the top point of the digastric groove in the coordinate system.

Precise Localization in Craniotomy With a Retrosigmoid Keyhole Approach: Microsurgical Anatomy and Clinical Study

Objective

We aimed to explore a method of precise localization within craniotomy based on skull anatomical landmarks via the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach.

Method

Craniometric measurements were taken from 15 adult dry skulls and eight cadaver head specimens. In the anatomical study, the keypoint corresponded to the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction's corresponding point on the external surface of the temporal mastoid process, eight cadaveric heads underwent a simulated craniotomy using the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. The center of the burr hole is precisely oriented 12 mm vertically above the top point of the mastoid groove based on the line between the infraorbital margin and the upper edge of the external auditory canal. Clinical application was verified in clinical surgery by evaluating the accuracy, safety, rapidity, and minimal invasiveness of the procedure in 29 patients.

Result

No venous sinus injuries were observed. Within clinical application, 29 patients underwent craniotomy using the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. The operative area was clearly exposed in all patients and the microsurgical anatomy of the intracranial region after the dura mater incision was satisfactory. No venous sinus ruptures were observed. The average craniectomy time was 27.02 ± 0.86 min. The diameter of the bone window was 1.7–2.9 cm.

Conclusion

We conclude that the method can ensure safe, accurate, and rapid craniotomy with good vision while avoiding injury to the venous sinus.

Developing a Method to Precisely Locate the Keypoint During Craniotomy Using the Retrosigmoid Keyhole Approach: Surgical Anatomy and Technical Nuances

Objective: To explore the precise location of the keypoint during craniotomy using the retrosigmoid keyhole approach.

Methods: This study included 20 dry skulls and 10 wet cadaveric specimens. On the inner surface of dry skulls, the junction between the inferior margin of the transverse sinus (ITS) and the posterior margin of the sigmoid sinus (TSJ) was marked. The keypoint (D) was identified as the TSJ's corresponding point on the external surface of the temporal mastoid process (MP). The distance from the keypoint to the top point of the digastric groove, mastoidale, and asterion were noted (AD, BD, CD, respectively). A method to accurately locate the keypoint was developed based on these relationships. The developed method was used on the wet cadaveric specimens to evaluate its accuracy, safety, rapidity, and minimal invasion.

Results: No significant difference was found between the AD, BD, and CD of the left and right sides. The drilling point was oriented on a straight line 12 mm above the top point of digastric groove, perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP). In the cadaveric specimens, the operative area was clearly exposed. No venous sinus rupture occurred. The average craniotomy time was 28.74 ± 3.89 min.

Conclusions: A potentially safe, accurate, and rapid craniotomy procedure was developed with the added advantage of preserving the visibility of the operating field and preventing venous sinus injury.

Mastoid notch as a landmark for localization of the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction

Background

The top of the mastoid notch (TMN) is close to the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction. The spatial position relationship between the TMN and the key points (the anterosuperior and inferomedial points of the transverse-sigmoid sinus junction, ASTS and IMTS) can be used as a novel method to precisely locate the sinus junction during lateral skull base craniotomy.

Methods

Forty-three dried adult skull samples (21 from males and 22 from females) were included in the study. A rectangular coordinate system on the lateral surface of the skull was defined to assist the analysis. According to sex and skull side, the data were divided into 4 groups: male&left, male&right, female&left and female&right. The distances from the ASTS and IMTS to the TMN were evaluated on the X-axis and Y-axis, symbolized as ASTS&TMN_x, ASTS&TMN_y, IMTS&TMN_x and IMTS&TMN_y.

Results

Among the four groups, there was no significant difference in ASTS&TMN_x (p = 0.05) and ASTS&TMN_y (p = 0.3059), but there were significant differences in IMTS&TMN_x (p < 0.001) and IMTS&TMN_y (p = 0.01), and multiple comparisons indicated that there were significant differences between male&left and female&left both in IMTS&TMN_x (p = 0.0006) and in IMTS&TMN_y (p = 0.0081). In general, the ASTS was located 1.92 mm anterior to the TMN on the X-axis and 27.01 mm superior to the TMN on the Y-axis. For the male skulls, the IMTS was located 3.60 mm posterior to the TMN on the X-axis and 14.40 mm superior to the TMN on the Y-axis; for the female skulls, the IMTS was located 7.84 mm posterior to the TMN on the X-axis and 19.70 mm superior to the TMN on the Y-axis.

Conclusions

The TMN is a useful landmark for accurately locating the ASTS and IMTS.

Preoperative identification of the initial burr hole site in retrosigmoid craniotomies: A teaching and technical note

BACKGROUND

When fashioning a retrosigmoid craniotomy, precise placement of the initial burr hole is crucial to avoid iatrogenic sinusal injury and to facilitate a corridor that allows for minimal cerebellar retraction.

METHODS

3D CT reconstructions of 16 cadaveric sides were used to identify and measure three discrete anatomical points. These three points and distances between them were plotted onto the surface of the skull using a digital caliper to identify the optimal burr hole location. This technique was subsequently applied in 20 clinical cases.

RESULTS

Optimal burr hole placement was achieved in 87.5% of specimens and, with minor refinement, 100% of clinical cases with no significant increase in operative time. Preoperative planning took an average of 10 minutes.

CONCLUSION

This technique for localizing the location of the initial retrosigmoid burr hole is a simple, safe, reliable, rapid, and inexpensive solution for surgeons who do not have regular access to neuronavigation.

Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the human mastoid process: A viewpoint on the methodology

The mastoid process is one of the most sexually dimorphic features in the human skull, and is therefore often used to identify the sex of skeletons. Numerous techniques for assessing variation in the size and shape of the mastoid process have been proposed and implemented in osteological research, but its complex form still presents difficulties for consistent and effective analysis. In this article, we compare the different techniques and variables that have been used to define, measure, and visually score sexual dimorphism in the mastoid process. We argue that the current protocols fail to capture the full morphological range of this bony projection, and suggest ways of improving and standardizing them, regarding both traditional and 3D-based approaches.