Ewing's Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Margins are not just for surgeons

Long-Term Survival after Primary Ewing's Sarcoma of the Skull with Intracranial Extension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

 Primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull is a very rare malignant neoplasm, predominantly occurring in children and adolescents. We describe here the clinical, neuroradiologic, and histopathologic features of a patient with primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull and discuss the standards of therapy for this type of tumor.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

 This 18-year-old male patient presented with a primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull, involving the dura of the frontal and parietal lobes of the left cerebral hemisphere. He was treated with gross total surgical excision of tumor, skull reconstruction, chemotherapy, and irradiation. Twelve years after the surgery, the patient has no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastases. Radical surgical excision of the primary tumor with safety margins is thought to play a role in the favorable clinical course.

CONCLUSION

 The presented case is the longest surviving patient after treatment of primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull bone. This rare type of tumor may allow better survival rates under adequate management than sarcoma elsewhere in the body.

Primary Cervical Extraosseous Ewing's Sarcoma Originated from the Sternocleidomastoid Muscle: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma is extremely rare in the soft tissues of the neck, especially in the sternocleidomastoid muscle. It usually manifests clinically as a rapidly growing mass that shows great potential for local spread. The aim of this paper is to present a rare case of еxtraosseous Ewing's sarcoma in the sternocleidomastoid muscle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma at this location. The patient was admitted to our clinic because of a neck tumefaction. The computerized tomography finding showed a tumor mass, most of which was in the V region of the neck, measuring 40 × 27 × 35 mm. Pathohistological and immunohistochemical findings showed that it was Ewing's sarcoma. Unfortunately, the patient passed away nine months after the initial diagnosis. Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma is a rare, fast-growing malignant tumor manifesting histomorphological similarities to bone Ewing's sarcoma. Most reports state that extraosseous Ewing sarcoma has a worse prognosis than skeletal. Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma should be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors of the neck.

Ewing's Sarcoma of Mandible: A Case Report with Review of Literature

Background

Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare malignancy, comprises whatever the age, 4-15% of all primary bone tumors. It represents 1% of all malignant tumors in children and is the fourth most common bone malignancy after myeloma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma.

Case description

A 12-year-old boy came to the Oral Surgery Department of Bretonneau Hospital referred by his dentist with a rapidly evolving swelling in the left mandibula for 6 weeks, which was initially diagnosed as a facial cellulitis. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) showed a poorly defined, expansile, and osteolytic tumor on the left side of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic findings were in favor of an aggressive primitive bone tumor. A mandibular biopsy under general anesthesia was performed in the Department of Surgical Oncology at Institut Curie in Paris, revealing an ES.

Conclusion

Mandibular ES can mimic dental infections when swelling is the main clinical manifestation, which can lead to a delayed diagnosis. A correlation between clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical with cytogenetics is needed to confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, smaller tumors have better survival.Dentists must therefore be aware of the clinical signs of ES in order to quickly refer patients to a specialized department.

How to cite this article

Bellut N, Lutz CM, Lesnik M, et al. Ewing's Sarcoma of Mandible: A Case Report with Review of Literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(2):187-190.

Ewing's Sarcoma of Mandible: Practical Approach to a Challenging Case

As a rare entity, sarcomas of the head and neck are challenging cases. In this paper, we represent a unique case of Ewing sarcoma of mandible, serving as an example of multidisciplinary team importance in a developing country.

Systemic treatment for primary malignant sarcomas arising in craniofacial bones

Introduction

Craniofacial bones may be the site of origin of various sarcomas. We review the various malignancies affecting this region of the body and attempt to put systemic treatment approaches into perspective.

Material and methods

Non-systematic literature review

Results

Conventional types of osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma are the most frequent bone sarcomas occurring in craniofacial region, but variants may occur. The tumors’ biologies and the resulting treatment strategies vary distinctly. As a general rule, local control remains paramount regardless of histology. The efficacy of antineoplastic chemotherapy varies by type of malignancy. It is clearly indicated in Ewing sarcoma and related tumors, potentially of benefit in high-grade osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, dedifferentiated and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and of no proven benefit in the others.

Conclusions

Various histologies demand various and distinct treatment approaches, with local control remaining paramount in all. The efficacy of systemic treatments varies by type of tumor. Prospective trials would help in all of these to better define systemic treatment strategies.

Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

Aim: The aim of this study was to systematically assess the risk of bias in osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to examine the relationships between bias and conflict of interest/industry sponsorship. Methods: An OVID-MEDLINE search was performed (1976–2019). Using the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, two reviewers independently assessed the prevalence of risk of bias in different RCT design domains. The relationship between conflicts of interest and industry funding with the frequency of bias was examined. Results: 73 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Prevalence of low-risk bias domains was 47.3%, unclear-risk domains 47.8%, and 4.9% of the domains had a high-risk of bias. Domains with the highest risk of bias were blinding of participants/personnel and outcome assessors, followed by randomization and allocation concealment. Overtime, frequency of unclear-risk of bias domains decreased (χ² = 5.32, p = 0.02), whilst low and high-risk domains increased (χ² = 8.13, p = 0.004). Studies with conflicts of interest and industry sponsorships were 4.2 and 3.1 times more likely to have design domains with a high-risk of bias (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that sources of potential bias are prevalent in both osteosarcoma and ES RCTs. Studies with financial conflicts of interest and industry sponsors were significantly more likely to have domains with a high-risk of bias. Improvements in reporting and adherence to proper methodology will reduce the risk of bias and improve the validity of the results of RCTs in osteosarcoma and ES.

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the floor of mouth: a case report and review of the literature

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in late adulthood and usually occurs in the limbs, trunk, and peritoneum. Less than 10% of MFH cases occur in the head and neck region. The clinical manifestations and pathological features of MFH are atypical, and it is difficult to make a clinical diagnosis. We describe a rare case of MFH of the floor of mouth and provide our diagnosis and treatment experiences. Through this review, we also evaluate the origin, World Health Organization (WHO) classification, clinical presentations, pathological features, treatment methods, and prognosis of MFH. MFH may originate from fibroblasts or primitive mesenchymal cells. MFH was defined as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the 2002 WHO classification of bone and soft tissue tumors. The most common manifestation of MFH is a painless enlarging nodule, often without overlying epidermal ulcers. Jaw lesions are usually found after displays of swelling, pain, paresthesia, and loose teeth. MFH is composed of pleomorphic spindle cells, usually with hemorrhage, necrosis, and lymphocyte infiltration. The main treatment method is surgical resection. Moreover, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have certain auxiliary effects. The local recurrence and distant metastasis of MFH are common, and the prognosis is poor. Therefore, determining the histopathological features of MFH and conducting appropriate immunohistochemical examinations are crucial in establishing the correct diagnosis. In-depth study is required in order to have a better understanding of head and neck MFH.

Treatment Concepts and Challenges in Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTSs) encompass a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumors with more than 50 histologic variants. The incidence of NRSTS is greater than rhabdomyosarcoma; however, each histologic type is rare. The treatment schema for all NRSTSs is largely surgical. The treatment is a risk-adapted approach based on tumor size, localization, tumor grade, and presence of metastases. Low-grade tumors are mainly managed by surgery alone, whereas for high-grade tumors a multimodal treatment concept is necessary. The multimodal treatment consists of tumor biopsy, chemotherapy, local treatment (surgery ± radiotherapy), and immunotherapy in selected conditions.

The epidemiology, surgical management, and impact of margins in skull and mandibular osseous-site tumors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of head and neck (HN) osseous-site tumors.

METHODS

Descriptive analyses and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to analyze the effect of surgery on overall survival (OS) utilizing the National Cancer Database (2004-2016).

RESULTS

Of 2449 tumors, surgery was utilized in 84.5% of cases. OS was worse in osteosarcoma (5-year OS: 53.4% [SE: 2.5%]) compared with cartilage tumors (5-year OS: 84.6% [SE: 1.8%]) (log-rank P < .001). Treatment regimens that included surgery were associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.495 [95% CI: 0.366-0.670]). Positive margins were found in 40.8% of cases, and associated with decreased OS in osteosarcomas (HR 1.304 [0.697-2.438]).

CONCLUSION

Treatment that included surgery was associated with an increased OS within our cohort of HN osseous-site tumors, although the rates of positive margins were >40%. These findings may be limited by inherent selection bias in the database.

Surgical treatment of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma in the parameningeal-nonparameningeal region

OBJECTIVES

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) involving the parameningeal-nonparameningeal region (PNP) is relatively rare in pediatric patients (PPs). The current study aimed to report the outcomes of RMS-PNP-PPs who received surgical resection combined with concurrent flap reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted concerning RMS-PNP-PPs who received combined skull-maxillofacial resection with flap reconstruction during the period from 2012 to 2016. Predictive factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were preliminarily identified by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 RMS-PNP-PPs were finally enrolled; recurrence, metastasis and death were found in 7, 7 and 5 patients, respectively. Following surgical ablation involving the skull base and maxillofacial region, reconstruction was performed with a local flap in 9 patients, a latissimus dorsi flap in 3 patients, and an anterolateral thigh flap in 4 patients. Through univariate analysis, we demonstrated that the primary site + surgical margins, postoperative RT/CT + Ki-67/Bcl-2 IHC, and surgical margins + Ki-67/Bcl-2 IHC could be used as the preliminarily prognostic factors for RFS, MFS and OS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RMS-PNP-PPs showed poor prognosis even when surgical resection combined with flap reconstructions was performed. Achieving a clear surgical margin and good conduction of postoperative RT/CT should be taken into consideration to acquiring a better surgical outcome.

Ewing's Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Margins are not just for surgeons

Background, Methods

To describe the characteristics, treatments (systemic/local), and outcome (oncological/functional) of French patients with head and neck Ewing's sarcomas (HNES) registered in the Euro‐Ewing 99 (EE99) database. Specific patient‐level data were reviewed retrospective.

Results

Forty‐seven HNES patients in the EE99 database had a median age of 11 years, 89% had bone tumors (skull 55%, mandible 21%, maxilla 11%), 89% had small tumors (<200 mL), and they were rarely metastatic (9%). Local treatment was surgery radiotherapy (55%), exclusively surgery (28%), or radiotherapy (17%). Metastatic relapses occurred in five patients with high relapse risk factors (metastasis at diagnosis, poor histological response, large tumors). Local progression/relapses (LR) after exclusive radiotherapy occurred in three patients with persistent extra‐osseous residue and in four patients considered R0 margins (postchemotherapy surgery, without postoperative radiotherapy [PORT]), reclassified by pathological review as R1a. Pathological review reclassified 72% of R0 margins: 11/18 to R1a and 2/18 to R2. Five patients had confirmed R0 margins after postchemotherapy surgery without PORT and had no LR Eight patients had R2 margins (initial surgery without previous chemotherapy, with PORT) and had no LR With a median follow‐up of 9.3 years, the 3‐year LR rate, EFS, and OS were 84.8%, 78.6%, and 89.3%, respectively. Among the 5‐year survivors, 88% had long‐term sequelae.

Conclusion

To optimize HNES management, patients should be treated from diagnosis in expert centers with multidisciplinary committees to discuss treatment strategy (type of surgery, need for PORT) and validate surgical margins.