Clinicopathological features and prognostic validity of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging systems in colonic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Clinical and pathological characteristics of and predictive model for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is increasing, causing a social burden. At present, there is no specific prognostic model for colorectal NETs. Thus, an accurate model is needed to predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal NETs.

Aim

We aimed to create a new nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal NETs. Furthermore, we compared nomogram we established and the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system in terms of prediction ability and accuracy.

Methods

A total of 3353 patients with colorectal NETs were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Additionally, LASSO regression was used to select variables for constructing the nomogram. Furthermore, the C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curve were used to evaluate the nomogram. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to compare the clinical utility of the nomogram with that of the TNM system. An external validation cohort (N = 61) was established to evaluate the nomogram's prediction accuracy.

Results

A total of 9 factors (age, sex, marital status, tumor size, T stage, M stage, N stage, grade, and surgery) were selected based on the results of LASSO analysis. The C-indexes of the nomogram in the training and validation sets were 0.807 and 0.775, respectively, which indicated that the nomogram had better prediction accuracy than TNM staging (C-index = 0.700 in the training set and 0.652 in the validation set). The C-index of the nomogram in the external validation cohort was 0.954, indicating that the nomogram had satisfactory prediction accuracy. The results of DCA revealed that the survival nomogram possessed greater utility in clinical practice.

Conclusion

We determined the OS and CSS of patients with colorectal NETs and developed a robust and clinically useful survival nomogram.

Risk of metastasis and survival in patients undergoing different treatment strategies with T1 colonic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of local excision (LE) for small (< 1‒2 cm) colonic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is controversial due to the higher metastasis risk when compared with rectal NETs. The study aimed to evaluate the metastasis risk of T1 colonic NETs and compare patients' long-term prognosis after LE or radical surgery (RS).

METHODS

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients with T1 colonic NETs (2004‒2015). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with metastasis risk. Propensity score matching was used to balance the variables. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated to estimate the prognosis of patients with T1N0M0 colonic NETs who underwent LE or RS.

RESULTS

Of the 610 patients with colonic NETs, 46 (7.54%) had metastasis at diagnosis. Tumor size (11-20 mm) (OR = 9.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.32‒21.45; P < 0.001), right colon (OR = 15.79; 95% CI 7.20‒38.56; P < 0.001), submucosal infiltration (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 0.84‒5.57; P = 0.125) were independent risk factors associated with metastasis. Of the 515 patients with T1N0M0 colonic NETs, the overall long-term prognosis of LE was as good as that of RS groups (after matching, 5-year CSS: 97.9% vs. 94.6%, P = 0.450; 5-year OS: 92.7% vs. 85.6%, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size (11‒20 mm) and site (right colon) are associated with metastasis in T1 colonic NETs. In the absence of metastasis, LE could be a viable option for 0‒10 mm T1 colonic NETs with well/moderate differentiation in the left colon in terms of long-term survival.

Diagnostic performance and impact on patient management of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors derived from hindgut

The main purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Try3-octreotide(DOTA-TOC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with well-differentiated colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) originating from the hindgut. The other aims were to assess the impact of the examination on patient management and to analyze the results of 2-[18F]FDG and/or 6-[18F]FDOPA PET/CT when they were performed. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT and clinical data from 30 patients with biopsy-proven well-differentiated NETs originating from the hindgut were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed by comparing the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT findings with pathological and/or follow-up data. We also compared the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT results with 2-[18F]FDG and/or 6-[18F]FDOPA PET/CT results in 6 patients. The impact on management was determined in hindsight by comparing the patient management decided before and after the TEP examination based on data from multidisciplinary team meetings. On a patient basis, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT was accurate in 30 of the 30 examinations. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT correctly identified the primary tumor in all patients with primary tumors not resected before the examination and allowed the detection of unexpected distant metastases in 36% of the patients referred for initial staging. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT findings affected patient management in 57% of cases with generally major intermodality changes. Intraindividual comparison of the results of the different PET radiopharmaceuticals showed a clear superiority of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT considering both the number of lesions and the intensity of uptake. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality for the assessment of well-differentiated colorectal NETs that highly impact patient management. Thus, we suggest that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT be employed as a first choice for the assessment of these tumors in nuclear medicine.

A modified mTNM staging system based on lymph node ratio for colon neuroendocrine tumors: A recursive partitioning analysis

BACKGROUND

In the current tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for colon neuroendocrine tumors, lymph node status is divided into N1 and N0. An assessment of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and a proposal for a modified mTNM staging system were the objectives of this study.

METHODS

Selecting the optimal cut-off value of LNR was done using X-tile. A Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method were performed to calculate patient cancer-specific survival in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cohort. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to improve TNM staging.

RESULTS

The study included 674 patients. The current TNM staging system showed inadequate discriminatory power between stage I and stage II patients (p = 0.088). The optimal cut-off value was determined as 0.6 for LNR. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, the modified mN classification could be classified into mN 0 (LNR = 0.00), mN 1 (LNR = 0.01-0.60), and mN 2 (LNR > 0.60), and was found to be an independent factor affecting prognosis (p < 0.001). Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer T and modified mN classifications, the modified mTNM system was constructed, and it exhibited better prognostic discriminatory power ability than the traditional TNM system (C-index: 0.587 vs. 0.665).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study determined that LNR is a prognostic factor in colon NET patients. In addition, to more accurately assess the prognosis of colon NET patients, we proposed a modified mTNM staging system.

Prognostic nomograms for lung neuroendocrine carcinomas based on lymph node ratio: a SEER database analysis

Objective

The current study aimed to explore the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (LNECs).

Methods

Data for 1564 elderly patients with LNECs between 1998 and 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The cases were assigned randomly to training (n = 1086) and internal validation (n = 478) sets. The association between LNR and survival was investigated by Cox regression.

Results

Multivariate analyses identified age, tumor grade, summary stage, M stage, surgery, and LNR as independent prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Tumor size was also a prognostic determinant for LCSS. Prognostic nomograms combining LNR with other informative variables showed good discrimination and calibration abilities in both the training and validation sets. In addition, the C-index of the nomograms was statistically superior to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in both the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusions

These nomograms, based on LNR, showed superior prognostic predictive accuracy compared with the AJCC staging system for predicting OS and LCSS in patients with LNECs.

Rectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: Case report

RATIONALE

Colorectal mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms constitute a rare group of gastrointestinal tumors composed by both neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine components. Nondiagnostic macroscopic features, specific histological features, and poor awareness of the disease are responsible for the underestimated incidence and conflicting data available. Due to lack of randomized clinical trials and validated clinical guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic approach are based on the standard of care for pure colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 76-year-old caucasian male, without relevant medical or familial history, presented a positive faecal occult blood test during colorectal cancer screening.

DIAGNOSIS

Total colonoscopy identified a rectal lesion with biopsy showing a moderate rectal adenocarcinoma staged as cT2N0M0.

INTERVENTIONS

Anterior resection of the rectum with right ileostomy followed by local radiotherapy with radio-sensitising chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine 1000 mg bid plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Due to chronic nodular pulmonary aspergillosis and chemotherapy induced immunosuppression patient was on 400 mg/daily of oral voriconazole.

OUTCOMES

Overall survival of 15 months after progression under first line treatment and under palliative chemotherapy with platinum plus etoposide regimen.

LESSONS

The reported case illustrates the challenge associated to the management of mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine carcinomas due to lack of validated guidelines and scientific evidence. From diagnosis and staging to treatment, all steps must be tailored to individual clinical and histological features.

Genetic Characteristics of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: More Similar to Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing incidence rate of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (CR-NEC), there are still few sequencing data to depict the genomic characteristics of CR-NEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Next-generation sequencing data of CR-NEC, colorectal adenocarcinoma (COREAD), lung neuroendocrine carcinoma (lung NEC), and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor (GI-NET) were retrieved from the American Association of Cancer Research Project Genomics, Evidence, Neoplasia, Information, Exchange (GENIE) database platform. Overall survival data of patients were obtained from cBioPortal.

RESULTS

The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 5.18 per megabase. TP53 (65.5%), APC (59.5%), KRAS (36.9%), BRAF (20.2%), and RB1 (16.7%) were the most common genes harboring somatic mutations. Nearly all of the BRAF mutations (88.2%) caused V600E. The most common copy number alterations were gain of MYC (12.3%), loss of RB1 (10.7%), and loss of PTEN (5.4%). Compared to lung NEC and GI-NET, the genetic characteristics of CR-NEC were more similar to that of COREAD. CR-NEC had a higher rate of potentially targetable gene alterations compared to lung NEC and GI-NET, and BRAF^V600E might be a promising treatment target. Survival analysis indicated that patients with high TMB had significantly worse survival than patients with low TMB (P < .001). In addition, KRAS and RB1 alteration were found to be correlated with worse survival (both P = .023).

CONCLUSION

CR-NEC has genetic alterations that are more similar to COREAD than other entities. A substantial group of CR-NEC harboring potentially targetable alterations (BRAF^V600E) deserves to be tested in clinical practice.

Do neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract have the same prognosis? A SEER database analysis of 12,878 cases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are both rare and malignant; however, it is unclear whether their prognosis is the same.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 12,878 patients with NEC or MiNEN in the GI tract were reviewed retrospectively by searching the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Next, we compared the characteristics and survival between patients with NEC or MiNEN and further analyzed the prognostic factors for the patients.

RESULTS

The data showed that patients with MiNEN had a worse prognosis as compared with patients with pure NEC in the small intestine (SI) and appendix, whereas there was no significant survival difference between NEC and MiNEN in the other parts of the GI system. On the whole, age ⩾55 years (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.002), being diagnosed at TNM Stage II-IV (p < 0.0001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.0001) were the independent negative prognostic factors for NEC patients, whereas age ⩾55 years (p = 0.003), being diagnosed at TNM Stage III-IV (p < 0.001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001) were identified as the independent negative prognostic factors for the MiNEN patients. Furthermore, when NECs or MiNENs were classified based on the primary tumor site, the results showed that the prognostic factors for NEC and MiNEN varied between the tumor sites.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic differences between NECs and MiNENs in the GI tract are heterogeneous and site-related. Patients with appendiceal or SI MiNEN have a poorer prognosis than patients with pure appendiceal or SI NEC. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with MiNEN in the SI and appendix and monitor them more closely.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic validity of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging systems in colonic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of colonic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and to validate the prognostic value of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging systems.

Methods

A total of 167 and 1248 patients with colonic NENs from 12 medical centers across China and from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry in the United States, respectively, were reviewed. Patients were staged according to the ENETS and AJCC 8th staging systems.

Results

Clinicopathological features of colonic NENs in the Chinese cohort and SEER cohort were significantly distinct. In both the Chinese cohort and the SEER cohort, colonic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adeno‐neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) were more frequent in the midgut than in the hindgut. Tumors originating from the midgut tended to be larger and at a more advanced stage than those from the hindgut. The AJCC 8th staging system and the ENETS system appeared to have similar prognostic ability for colonic NEC/MANEC.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that tumors originating from the midgut and the hindgut shared different clinicopathological features. The AJCC 8th staging system and the ENETS system appeared to have similar prognostic ability for colonic NEC/MANEC.