1
|
Sittitrai P, Ruenmarkkaew D, Chitapanarux I, Muangwong P, Kangsadarnwiroon K, Benjawongsatien R, Srivanitchapoom C, Donchalermpak S, Asakit T. Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort study in Northern Thailand, an Endemic Nasopharyngeal Cancer Area. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024; 25:699-708. [PMID: 38415558 PMCID: PMC11077134 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.2.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and oncological outcomes of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP) patients in an endemic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) area. METHODS One hundred and forty-four HNCUP patients curatively treated between January 1995 and December 2022 from 5 centers were retrospectively recruited onto the study to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes and compare them with historical data. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting survival outcomes. A propensity-matched pair analysis of the patients with positive and negative EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) staining was applied to compare the characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 45 months. Most patients (88.2%) received total mucosal irradiation (TMI). Primary tumor emergence (PTE) was detected in 6 patients (4.2%) who did not have TMI. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival were 51.3%, 64.9%, and 72.7%, respectively. Extranodal extension and N3 compared with the N1 stage were the significant independent predictors for OS (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.12-7.51, p = 0.028 and HR 3.66, 95%CI 1.23-11.89, p = 0.031, respectively). The matched-pair analysis demonstrated comparable all survival outcomes between the EBER-positive and -negative groups. All patients in the matched pair analysis received TMI, and no PTE was detected. CONCLUSION Our survival outcomes were comparable to previous studies with a low rate of PTE. The matched pair analysis of EBER-positive and -negative groups revealed similar oncological outcomes and no primary tumor emergence when total mucosal irradiation was administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pichit Sittitrai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Donyarat Ruenmarkkaew
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Imjai Chitapanarux
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Pooriwat Muangwong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | | | | | | | | | - Tussawan Asakit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lampang Cancer Hospital, Lampang, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rassy E, Labaki C, Chebel R, Boussios S, Smith-Gagen J, Greco FA, Pavlidis N. Systematic review of the CUP trials characteristics and perspectives for next-generation studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 107:102407. [PMID: 35569387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on therapeutic strategies for patients with unknown primary cancer (CUP) has been underwhelming. This paper summarized and evaluated the CUP therapeutic research over the previous five years. Based on this evaluation, recommendations for clinical trial designs are made to improve the impact of CUP research on patients. METHODS Published and ongoing research were evaluated. PubMed was searched from January 1, 2015, to November 1, 2021. The start date of 2015 was chosen to identify research published after ESMO issued new diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. The US National Library of Medicine indexed ongoing clinical trials. FINDINGS Of the 244 CUP studies indexed in PubMed, 11.9% were prospective studies, and 4.9% were clinical trials. The review protocol deemed 65 publications eligible for full-text review. Eleven studies evaluating therapeutic regimens were retained. The two prospective studies and non-randomized trials showed promising outcomes for site-specific treatments. Randomized clinical trials were less promising; however, the trials had recruitment challenges resulting in biased accrual and the inability to keep pace with advancing diagnostics and therapeutics. Most of the 35 ongoing studies were phase II single-arm trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or site-specific therapies among CUP patients with suspected favorable prognoses. CONCLUSION Our evaluation suggests two prospective clinical trial designs that addressed recent study design and recruitment challenges. A visionary approach uses a multi-arm, multistage randomized trial to address rapid advancements in diagnosis and therapy. A pragmatic approach utilizes a single-arm trial with historical controls to overcome comparison group and recruitment challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Rassy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Roy Chebel
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Stergios Boussios
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, SE1 9RT London, UK
| | | | - F Anthony Greco
- Sarah Cannon Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Leo AN, Mendenhall WM, Dagan R, Hitchcock KE, Dziegielewski PT, Morris CG, Amdur RJ. Sparing the Larynx and Hypopharynx With Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site and Predominant Adenopathy in Level IIA. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:366-373. [PMID: 34175470 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is controversy about the need to target the mucosa of the larynx and hypopharynx during radiation therapy (RT) for squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site (SCCA-UP). By 1997, the policy in our department was to target only the oropharynx and nasopharynx in patients with SCCA-UP metastatic to the level II cervical nodes. The purpose of this study was to report the rate of cancer recurrence in the larynx or hypopharynx using an approach that excluded these areas from the RT target volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS The inclusion criteria for this study were RT in our department for SCCA-UP between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2019; no history of surgery that could disrupt the cervical lymphatics; predominant adenopathy in level IIA; and neck stage N1-2c. We excluded N3 because the incidental dose to the larynx and hypopharynx is usually high in patients with a >6-cm nodal conglomerate. RESULTS The study population was comprised of 50 patients with a median follow-up after RT of 7.1 years. No patient developed recurrent cancer in a mucosal site (0/50), 2% (1/50) developed a neck recurrence in a high-dose area with synchronous distant metastases, and 2% (1/50) developed distant metastases with no evidence of local or regional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS When delivering RT for SCCA-UP metastatic predominantly to level IIA, it is not necessary to target the mucosa of the larynx or hypopharynx. The extent to which the incidental RT dose to these areas contributes to cancer control is not evaluated in this study.
Collapse
|
4
|
Boeker R, Stromberger C, Heiland M, Beck-Broichsitter B, Hofmann VM, Neumann K, Ochsenreither S, Olze H, Dommerich S, Piwonski I, Coordes A. Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2534-E2542. [PMID: 33734438 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer, the classification for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) changed in addition to oropharyngeal carcinomas. The current classification considers extranodal extension (ENE), determination of p16 (surrogate marker for human papillomavirus), and detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the new classification on the prognosis of p16-positive and p16-negative CUP and the impact of EBV proof. METHODS Clinical and pathological data from patients with CUP of the head and neck between 2009 and 2018 were evaluated. The 7th (UICC7) and 8th (UICC8) edition of the Union for International Cancer Control staging system were applied and compared. RESULTS There were 97 patients treated, 26.8% women and 73.2% men. The average age at initial diagnosis was 64.6 years. Of which, 58.8% had a documented history of smoking, 37.1% were positive for p16, 4.1% were positive for EBV, and 66% had ENE. Most of the patients were at stage III/IVa (78.4% according to UICC7). According to UICC8, p16+ patients were mainly at stage I (86.1%), and p16- at stage IVb (56.1%). P16 status (P = .002), ENE (P = .001), nodal category (TNM7, P < .001), UICC stage (TNM7, P < .001) and UICC stage (TNM8, P < .001) had a significant impact on survival in the univariate analysis. The 8th TNM classification resulted in a downstaging of p16-positive CUP syndromes and an upstaging of p16-negative syndromes. CONCLUSION The 8th TNM classification shows the lower UICC stage in p16-positive CUP syndromes. The prognostic significance for survival has improved from the 7th to the 8th TNM classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE USING THE 2011 OCEBM: Level 3. Laryngoscope, 131:E2534-E2542, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Boeker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Veit M Hofmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Neumann
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Biometrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.,Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dou S, Li R, Zhang L, Wang Z, Xie L, Zhang C, Zhu G. Long-term results of elective mucosal irradiation for head and neck cancer of unknown primary in Chinese population: The EMICUP study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:1712-1720. [PMID: 31953927 PMCID: PMC7050068 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Controversy still exists regarding the volume of radiation for head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP). Theoretically, elective mucosal irradiation (EMI) should achieve a balance between survival and toxicity. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the long‐term benefit of EMI in Chinese HNCUP patients. Methods A phase II, single‐arm trial was performed at two centers in China. HNCUP patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma were enrolled. Patients with metastatic lymph nodes limited to level IV and/or the supraclavicular fossa were excluded. The EMI approach was specifically customized to Chinese patients by differentiating HNCUP as putative nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) or non‐putative NPC. The primary endpoint was 3‐year mucosal recurrence‐free survival (MRFS). Results A total of 48 patients were enrolled between 02/02/2010 and 08/01/2018; 46 patients were analyzed, including 24 putative NPC and 22 non‐putative NPC patients. No primary recurrence was observed during a median follow‐up period of 70 months, and only 1 patient experienced out of field recurrence in the contralateral neck. The 3‐year MRFS was 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%). The 5‐year MRFS, regional‐recurrence free survival (RRFS) and overall survival (OS) were 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%), 86.0% (95%CI: 71.1%‐93.7%), and 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%), respectively. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities occurred, and the most frequent grade 3 acute toxicity was oral mucositis (45.7%). Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate the long‐term outcomes of EMI in Chinese HNCUP patients. Excellent MRFS and OS rates were observed. Further randomized studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengjin Dou
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongrong Li
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhuoying Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xie
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenping Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guopei Zhu
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|