Phase II trial of S-1 treatment as palliative-intent chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma

Thymic epithelial tumor medical treatment: A narrative review

Thymic epithelial tumors, a malignancy originating in the thymus, are the commonest primary neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum; however, among thoracic tumors, they have a relatively low incidence rare. Thymic epithelial tumors can be broadly classified into thymic carcinoma and thymoma. As the cornerstone of thymic tumor treatment, surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage patients, whereas, for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, the treatment is chemoradiotherapy. Targeted therapy is less effective for thymic tumors. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as another effective treatment option for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, particularly thymomas, is limited owing to immune-related adverse effects. Here, we have summarized all pertinent information regarding chemotherapy, especially preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy in combination with other treatments, and reviewed the effectiveness of these procedures and recent advances in targeted therapy. In addition, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in thymic epithelial tumors, to provide a holistic treatment view.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Second-line Therapies for Patients With Advanced Thymic Carcinoma

AIMS

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare form of highly invasive tumors. Currently, the standard first-line therapy involves paclitaxel plus carboplatin treatment, while the recommended regimen for second-line therapy remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to explore the second-line mode of TC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the outcome of subjects with advanced TC between 2009 and 2023 in three medical centers, retrospectively. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-Meier was used for calculating Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The factors affecting survival in the real world were evaluated by Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 136 patients were included in this study, the median PFS (mPFS) for all subjects was 5.97 months, and the median OS (mOS) was 25.03 months. According to patient's treatment modes, they are divided into monotherapy (n = 95) and combination therapy (n = 41), PFS manifested the difference between two groups (5.17 vs. 9.00 months, P = 0.043). OS also indicated a significant distinction (22.50 vs. 38.00 months, P = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in PFS between patients using immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and those with antivascular therapy (8.57 vs. 13.10 months, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

In the second-line therapy for advanced TC, the efficacy of combination therapy was better than monotherapy, especially for immunotherapy combined with antivascular therapy.

Current Treatment Approaches for Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), including thymoma, thymic carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, are uncommon tumors that originate from the epithelial cells of the thymus. Nevertheless, despite their rarity, they represent the most common tumor type located in the anterior mediastinum. Therapeutic choices based on staging and histology may include surgery with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy represented by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. For patients with advanced or metastatic TETs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment; however, some new drugs and combinations are currently under evaluation. In any case, proper management of patients with TETs requires a multidisciplinary team approach to personalize care for each patient.

Surgical, Radiation, and Systemic Treatments of Patients With Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Thymic epithelial tumors are rare and are classified as thymoma, thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the treatment options for patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

METHODS

This systematic review was developed by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)'s Program in Evidence-Based Care and by the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing surgical, radiotherapy, or systemic treatments against any combination of these treatments in patients with thymic epithelial tumors. Meta-analyses were conducted with clinically homogenous studies.

RESULTS

A total of 106 studies were included, mainly from observational studies. There was an overall survival benefit with postoperative radiotherapy for patients with thymic carcinoma (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.89) and for patients with thymoma (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.82), especially for those with a high risk for mortality. Patients with thymic carcinoma or thymoma had a response to chemotherapy. Selection bias affected the results for studies that evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy or minimally invasive surgical techniques. Furthermore, the overall survival benefit found for adjuvant chemotherapy may have been confounded by the administration of postoperative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma, the literature is of low quality and subject to bias. There were overall survival benefits with postoperative radiotherapy. The results of this systematic review were used to inform treatment recommendations in a clinical practice guideline. Future large-scale prospective studies that control for confounders are needed.

Second-line treatment options in advanced thymic carcinoma after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Currently there is no standard therapy recommended for second-line treatment for thymic carcinoma. Our study compared multidrug chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced thymic carcinoma who had previous platinum-based chemotherapy at the clinic.

METHODS

The study included patients with thymic carcinoma who failed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were applied in the study for estimating the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves. Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact chi-square test was adopted to make comparisons of the objective response rate (ORR) between treatment groups. Cox regression was used for the multivariate analyses in PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Among the 92 patients enrolled, multidrug chemotherapy was used in 51 (55.4%) patients for second-line therapy. Thirty-six patients (35.9%) received single-agent chemotherapy, and eight patients (8.7%) underwent PD-1 inhibitors. The multidrug chemotherapy group showed better efficacy than the other two groups, with an ORR of 35.3% (p = 0.006). The median PFS of multidrug chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors were 5.0 months, 3.0 months, and 4.0 months, respectively (p = 0.008). Patients in the multidrug chemotherapy group also showed an advantage in OS in comparison with the other two treatment groups (p = 0.045), with a median OS of 30.4 months. Multivariate analysis showed that second-line treatment was independent factor for both PFS (p = 0.035) and OS (p = 0.037). Grade 3-4 AEs were mostly detected in patients receiving multidrug chemotherapy and were primarily hematologic. Treatment-related mortality was not found in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidrug chemotherapy had a trend toward a more positive response rate and outcomes in longer survival time than single-agent chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors. Multidrug chemotherapy is a choice worth considering for second-line therapy in patients with thymic carcinoma if tolerable.

Efficacy and safety of treatments for advanced thymic carcinoma after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer and patients failing initial chemotherapy (relapse/refractory) face limited therapeutic options given no approved options or consensus standard of care. This study aimed to identify and summarize clinical outcomes of all regimens evaluated in clinical trials of relapsed or refractory patients. Interventional trials enrolling advanced TC patients who failed first-line chemotherapy and reported outcomes in this group were eligible for inclusion in our systemic literature review (SLR). Between-study heterogeneity was assessed to determine the feasibility of pooling specific studies and treatments. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR) endpoints were of interest for meta-analysis. Nineteen trials were identified in the SLR. Three trials with one or two TC patients were removed from our assessment to reduce publication bias. Response rates among studies with at least ten TC patients varied from 9 % to 38 %. Pooled ORRs in patients receiving S-1 (46 patients), sunitinib (46 patients), or pembrolizumab (66 patients) were 28 %, 24 %, and 21 %, respectively. Prolonged duration of response with pembrolizumab was observed with a pooled median of 23.8 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 12, not reached). Median PFS of five months or greater was reported in patients treated with sunitinib, lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, capecitabine + gemcitabine, everolimus, or S-1. Median OS of 20 months or greater was reported in trials evaluating S-1 or pembrolizumab; this endpoint was not reached in trials evaluating lenvatinib, regorafenib, or sunitinib. Generalizability of treatment effects is challenging in the research of rare diseases and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes may help to increase precision and relevance of results to the larger TC population. Our study found limited treatment options upon relapse, demonstrating a need for further investigations into novel therapeutics and well-powered clinical trials to better inform on optimal treatments.

The efficacy of small molecule anti-angiogenic drugs in previously treated Thymic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic drugs have shown initial efficacy in the treatment of advanced thymic carcinomas (TCs); however, data are limited. In this study, we provide real-world data relating to the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs for the treatment of patients with TCs.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on clinical progress after first-line chemotherapy in TCs patients who were treated with small molecule antiangiogenic drugs at our institution between January 2010 and December 2021. Tumor response was evaluated according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Progression free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients enrolled, 13 (76.5%) received apatinib and four (23.5%) anlotinib monotherapy with an objective response rate of 23.5%. Eleven (64.7%) patients had stable disease. The median follow-up period was 46.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.0-59.0 months). The median progression survival and overall survival were 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.5-9.3) and 47.0 months (95% CI, 35.4-58.6), respectively. In the 13 patients receiving apatinib, the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-9.0), compared with 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-13.3 months) for patients in the anlotinib group (P = 0.945). The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (n = 3, 23.1%), followed by proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome (HFS, n = 2, 15.4%). There were no grade 4 AEs although eight patients (47.1%) required mid-course discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

For refractory TCs, small molecule antiangiogenic drugs are efficacious as second- or post-line treatments. The toxicity of antiangiogenic therapy is manageable.

Clinical outcomes for patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma after undergoing different front-line chemotherapy regimens

Background

Front‐line platinum‐base chemotherapy for advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma (TC) improves resectability and prolongs patients' overall survival (OS). In this study, we evaluated patients' outcomes given different front‐line regimens: cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP); cisplatin and etoposide (EP); or cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with advanced thymoma and TC who were treated at our medical center between 2005 and 2015. We investigated objective response rates (ORRs), progression‐free survival (PFS), and OS after undergoing different front‐line regimens.

Results

Among the 108 enrolled patients, 37 (34%) had thymoma and 71 (66%) had TC; 45 received CAP, 36 received EP, and 27 received TP regimens. The ORRs of patients receiving CAP, EP, and TP were 51%, 50%, and 41%, respectively. For patients with stage III and IVA disease, the median PFS after CAP, EP, and TP were 34.5, 26.4, and 18.0 months (p = 0.424), respectively, and the 5‐year OS rates were 84.9%, 70.6%, and 60.0% (p = 0.509). In patients with stage IVB disease, the median PFS were 9.4, 8.2, and 11.6 months after undergoing CAP, EP, and TP (p = 0.173), respectively, and the 5‐year OS rates were 41.1%, 39.1%, and 14.3% (p = 0.788). TC pathology subtype and liver metastasis were associated with poor OS. Three patients with stage IVB TC had an OS of more than 5 years.

Conclusion

Different front‐line chemotherapy regimens may provide similar long‐term PFS and OS in patients with advanced thymoma and TC. In addition to TC and liver metastasis were associated with poor OS, other potential prognostic factors are warranted for studying.

Therapeutic options in thymomas and thymic carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Radical surgery is the best therapeutic option for thymic malignancies. However, patients with advanced or recurrent thymic malignancies often require chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Since thymic malignancies are rare cancers, the efficacy and safety of treatments have been verified based on small Phase 2 trials or retrospective studies.

AREA COVERED

We comprehensively reviewed the treatment strategies for thymic malignancies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Additionally, we reviewed specific situations, such as pleural dissemination, central nervous system metastasis, and paraneoplastic syndrome.

EXPERT OPINION

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard option in pharmacotherapy. However, multikinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib and lenvatinib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors including pembrolizumab have been developed to treat thymic carcinomas. Now, a Phase 2 study is evaluating whether lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab benefits patients with type B3 thymoma or thymic carcinoma. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/ mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may contribute to disease control and octreotide scan is only applicable to somatostatin analogues. Although the genomic characteristics of thymic malignancies have been analyzed, few actionable mutations have been detected in general. The development of a treatment strategy using combination pharmacotherapy is anticipated.

Cisplatin and Irinotecan as First-Line Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Metastatic Thymic Carcinoma: Updated Analysis

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the de facto standard treatment for metastatic or unresectable thymic carcinoma. The optimal chemotherapy regimen has not yet been determined, including whether this should be combined with a second- or third-generation anti-cancer agent. We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients with metastatic or unresectable thymic carcinoma who were treated with a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy between 2002 and 2021 (trial registration UMIN000012175). The primary endpoint was response rate according to the RECIST criteria version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity (adverse events). Some patients analyzed in this study were also included in the previous trial, which was terminated early. For this analysis, we included 18 patients with a median age of 56 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. All patients had clinical stage IVa or IVb thymic carcinoma according to the Masaoka-Koga staging system. The response rate was 44% and the disease control rate was 89%. The median PFS was 8.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7–11.6 months) and the median OS was 45.6 months (95% CI: 15.7–69.1 months). Grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity was observed in 5 patients and grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicity was observed in 3 patients. None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Thus, the combination of cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic thymic carcinoma showed efficacy and acceptable toxicity.

Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Thymic Carcinoma

Thymic carcinoma is a rare neoplasm, and it is difficult to achieve complete remission with systemic chemotherapy. In advanced or recurrent thymic carcinoma, platinum-based chemotherapy is chosen as the first-line setting; however, it remains unclear which regimen is better to improve its outcome. It remains unknown whether salvage chemotherapy should be administered to patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory thymic carcinoma. Currently, several clinical studies have investigated the efficacy of second-line settings for advanced thymic carcinoma. As cytotoxic agents, S-1, amrubicin, pemetrexed, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine have been reported as prospective phase II studies or retrospective studies. The overall response rates (ORRs) of S-1, amrubicin, and pemetrexed were 25-50%, 11-44.4%, and 9-10%, respectively. Molecular targeting drugs, such as sunitinib, everolimus, and lenvatinib, also provide clinical effectiveness with tolerability after the failure of platinum-based regimens. Based on the results of the prospective phase II study, the ORR, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 16.6% and 5.6 months, respectively, in everolimus, 26% and 7.2 months, respectively, in sunitinib, and 38% and 9.3 months, respectively, in lenvatinib. Although it is difficult to compare each study, lenvatinib appears to be better in increasing efficacy as a second-line setting. However, each study had a small sample size, which may have biased the results of their studies. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the therapeutic significance of salvage chemotherapy in advanced thymic carcinoma in a large-scale study.

Future Perspective of Chemotherapy and Pharmacotherapy in Thymic Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Thymic carcinoma is a rare cancer, and its biology remains largely unknown. Although complete surgical resection is a standard treatment for thymic carcinoma, systemic chemotherapy is frequently administered in metastatic or recurrent cases. Given the rarity, therapeutic agents are often confirmed on the basis of the results of phase II trials or retrospective studies. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has long been employed for treating thymic carcinoma. Recently, biomarkers have been explored, and molecular profiles and major oncogenic pathways have gradually been revealed by next-generation sequencing, resulting in the development of targeted therapies. Moreover, clinical trials assessing combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing and are expected to be efficacious for treating thymic epithelial tumors. We reviewed the current role of systemic chemotherapy, including targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, considering recent findings regarding its biology.

Abstract

Thymic carcinoma is a rare cancer that arises from thymic epithelial cells. Its nature and pathology differ from that of benign thymoma, presenting a poorer prognosis. If surgically resectable, surgery alone or surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. Metastatic and refractory thymic carcinomas require systemic pharmacotherapy. Combined carboplatin and paclitaxel, and cisplatin and anthracycline-based regimens have been shown a fair response rate and survival to provide a de facto standard of care when compared with other drugs employed as first-line chemotherapy. Cytotoxic agents have been pivotal for treating thymic carcinoma, as little is known regarding its tumorigenesis. In addition, genetic alterations, including driver mutations, which play an important role in treatments, have not yet been discovered. However, molecular pathways and biomarker studies assessing thymic epithelial tumors have been reported recently, resulting in the development of new agents, such as molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. As treatment options are currently limited and the prognosis remains poor in metastases and recurrent thymic carcinoma, genetic alterations need to be assessed. In the present review, we focused on the current role of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating thymic carcinoma.

Administration of oral maintenance chemotherapy for 1 year following definitive chemoradiotherapy may improve the survival of patients with stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and the optimal maintenance period of oral chemotherapy using S1 following definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (N3-NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for N3-NPC treatment with maintenance chemotherapy (MC) [chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-MC] or without MC (CRT-non-MC) following definitive CRT between May 2014 and December 2017. Toxicities during MC were recorded. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were compared between CRT-MC and CRT-non-MC cohorts. The optimal duration of using maintenance S1 (MC-S1) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients with stage N3-NPC were identified, of whom 56 were treated with CRT-MC and 248 with CRT-non-MC. After a median follow-up of 48 months, significant differences in OS (74.9 vs. 91.7%; P = 0.003), PFS (60.7 vs. 83.7%; P = 0.001) and DMFS (68.8 vs. 85.5%; P = 0.015) were observed between the CRT-non-MC and CRT-MC groups. Skin hyperpigmentation, leukopenia and fatigue were common but not severe (grade 1-2) side effects of MC. The OS, DMFS and PFS were significantly higher for patients who received S1 administration over a period of ≥12 cycles compared with those who received <12 cycles (3-year OS, 100 vs. 87.5%, P = 0.018; 3-year PFS, 93.9 vs. 67.9%, P = 0.006; 3-year DMFS, 97.1 vs. 67.9%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Using MC-S1 in patients with N3-NPC following definitive chemoradiotherapy achieved superior survival rate compared with the patients with non-MC. The side effects of MC-S1 were mild and tolerable. S1 should be maintained for ≥12 cycles.

Phase II trial of S-1 treatment as palliative-intent chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with minimal evidence of survival following palliative-intent chemotherapy. Sunitinib, everolimus, and pembrolizumab have been proposed as active agents based on previous phase II trials. In this phase II study, TC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received S-1 orally twice daily at a dose of 40-60 mg/m² for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off until the progression of the disease or the presence of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The sample size of 26 patients was planned to reject the ORR of 10% under the expectation of 30% with a power of 0.80 and a type I error of 0.05 (one-sided). Twenty-six patients were recruited between 2013 and 2016; 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 10 had an ECOG performance status of 0. One patient showed complete response and seven patients showed partial responses, resulting in a 30.8% response rate (90% confidence interval [CI], 18.3-46.9) and an 80.8% disease control rate (90% CI, 65.4-90.3). The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3-10.3 months) and median OS was 27.4 months (95% CI, 16.6-34.3). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (12%), skin rash (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue (4%). No treatment-related death was observed. S-1 confirmed clinical activity with tolerability in patients with previously treated TC. (UMIN000010736).