1
|
Damman OC, van Strien-Knippenberg IS, Engelhardt EG, Determann D D, de Bruijne MC, Siesling S, Konings IR, Timmermans DR. Information and communication priorities of patients and healthcare professionals in shared decision making regarding adjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment: A survey study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 70:102574. [PMID: 38643680 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess information and communication priorities of patients and healthcare professionals in Shared Decision Making about adjuvant systemic treatment of primary breast cancer and identify key decision-relevant information accordingly. METHODS Patients (N = 122) and professionals working with breast cancer patients (N = 118), of whom 38 were nurse practitioners and 32 nurses, were recruited using convenience sampling, and surveyed about information/communication aspects key to decision-making, using ranking assignments. We further posed a simple open question, questions about receiving population-based statistics versus personalized statistics concerning treatment outcomes, and their attitude and experience concerning Shared Decision Making. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and a qualitative analysis. RESULTS Both patients and professionals prioritized information about treatment outcomes (i.e., survival, recurrence) as key decision-relevant information for patients. Patients prioritized information about relatively severe treatment side-effects and late effects (e.g., blood clot, stroke), whilst professionals prioritized information about effects that occur relatively often (e.g., hair loss, fatigue). Patients specifically wanted to know if the benefit of treatment is worth the negative impact. Both groups prioritized personalized statistics over population-based statistics. CONCLUSIONS Some differences between patients and professionals were found in information and communication priorities, specifically related to the different side-effects. It seems worthwhile to precisely address these side-effects in Shared Decision Making concerning adjuvant systemic treatment. Furthermore, it seems important to deliberate together on the question if expected benefit of treatment is worth the potential negative impact for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga C Damman
- Department of Public & Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Inge S van Strien-Knippenberg
- Department of Public & Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands
| | | | - Martine C de Bruijne
- Department of Public & Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Netherlands
| | - Inge R Konings
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Danielle R Timmermans
- Department of Public & Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans RP, Bryant LD, Russell G, Absolom K. Trust and acceptability of data-driven clinical recommendations in everyday practice: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2024; 183:105342. [PMID: 38266426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing attention is being given to the analysis of large health datasets to derive new clinical decision support systems (CDSS). However, few data-driven CDSS are being adopted into clinical practice. Trust in these tools is believed to be fundamental for acceptance and uptake but to date little attention has been given to defining or evaluating trust in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES A scoping review was conducted to explore how and where acceptability and trustworthiness of data-driven CDSS have been assessed from the health professional's perspective. METHODS Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital, IEEE Xplore and Google Scholar were searched in March 2022 using terms expanded from: "data-driven" AND "clinical decision support" AND "acceptability". Included studies focused on healthcare practitioner-facing data-driven CDSS, relating directly to clinical care. They included trust or a proxy as an outcome, or in the discussion. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) is followed in the reporting of this review. RESULTS 3291 papers were screened, with 85 primary research studies eligible for inclusion. Studies covered a diverse range of clinical specialisms and intended contexts, but hypothetical systems (24) outnumbered those in clinical use (18). Twenty-five studies measured trust, via a wide variety of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. A further 24 discussed themes of trust without it being explicitly evaluated, and from these, themes of transparency, explainability, and supporting evidence were identified as factors influencing healthcare practitioner trust in data-driven CDSS. CONCLUSION There is a growing body of research on data-driven CDSS, but few studies have explored stakeholder perceptions in depth, with limited focused research on trustworthiness. Further research on healthcare practitioner acceptance, including requirements for transparency and explainability, should inform clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth P Evans
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Gregor Russell
- Bradford District Care Trust, Bradford, New Mill, Victoria Rd, BD18 3LD, UK.
| | - Kate Absolom
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Meng M, Yang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhao J, Yin Y, Pei X, Hao Y. "All about the value?" Decisional needs of breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the Chinese context: A mixed-methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 120:108102. [PMID: 38141445 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore breast cancer (BC) patients' participation in breast reconstruction (BR) decision-making and specific decisional needs, especially the manifestations and causes of decisional conflicts, in China. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted using triangulation of data from interviews and a questionnaire survey with health care professionals (HCPs) and BC patients with BR decision-making experience at 5 Beijing centers. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework guided (ODSF) the qualitative and quantitative data analyses. RESULTS A total of 82.53% of Chinese BC patients would consider BR. Seven themes captured patients' BR decisional needs per the ODSF: inadequate support/resources (100%, 58.82%) and knowledge (75%, 52.94%) were most frequently cited. Health beliefs (unclear values) reflected Chinese characteristics. Patients had inadequate knowledge (M=19.99/50, SD=8.67) but positive BR attitudes (M=59.48/95, SD=10.45). CONCLUSIONS BR decisions for Chinese BC patients are complex and often accompanied by decisional conflicts. Inadequate knowledge and inadequate support and resources contribute to these conflicts, emphasizing the need for culturally tailored information and support to promote SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS HCPs need specialized training in SDM to guide patients in decision-making. It is essential to provide relevant resources and support that are culturally and clinically appropriate for Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Li
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiqi Meng
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Yang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
| | - Yiyi Yin
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Pei
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yufang Hao
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Markowetz F. All models are wrong and yours are useless: making clinical prediction models impactful for patients. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:54. [PMID: 38418530 PMCID: PMC10901807 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00553-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Markowetz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Recchia G, Moser KS, Freeman AL. What Affects Perceived Trustworthiness of Online Medical Information and Subsequent Treatment Decision Making? Randomized Trials on the Role of Uncertainty and Institutional Cues. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9:23814683241226660. [PMID: 38370149 PMCID: PMC10870812 DOI: 10.1177/23814683241226660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background. Online, algorithmically driven prognostic tools are increasingly important in medical decision making. Institutions developing such tools need to be able to communicate the precision and accuracy of the information in a trustworthy manner, and so many attempt to communicate uncertainties but also use institutional logos to underscore their trustworthiness. Bringing together theories on trust, uncertainty, and psychological distance in a novel way, we tested whether and how the communication of uncertainty and the presence of institutional logos together affected trust in medical information, the prognostic tool itself, and treatment decisions. Methods. A pilot and 2 online experiments in which UK (experiment 1) and worldwide (experiment 2) participants (Ntotal = 4,724) were randomized to 1 of 12 arms in a 3 (uncertainty cue) × 4 (institutional cue) between-subjects design. The stimulus was based on an existing medical prognostic tool. Results. Institutional trust was consistently associated with trust in the prognostic tool itself, while uncertainty information had no consistent effect. Institutional trust predicted the amount of weight participants reported placing on institutional endorsements in their decision making and the likelihood of switching from passive to active treatment in a hypothetical scenario. There was also a significant effect of psychological distance to (perceived hypotheticality of) the scenario. Conclusions/Implications. These results underline the importance of institutions demonstrating trustworthiness and building trust with their users. They also suggest that users tend to be insensitive to communications of uncertainty and that communicators may need to be highly explicit when attempting to warn of low precision or quality of evidence. The effect of the perceived hypotheticality of the scenario underscores the importance of realistic decision-making scenarios for studies and the role of familiarity with the decision dilemma generally. Highlights In a world where information for medical decision making is increasingly going to be provided through digital, online tools, institutions providing such tools need guidance on how best to communicate about their trustworthiness and precision.We find that people are fairly insensitive to cues designed to communicate uncertainty around the outputs of such tools. Even putting "ATTENTION" in bold font or explicitly pointing out the weaknesses in the data did not appear to affect people's decision making using the tool's outputs. Institutions should take note, and further work is required to determine how best to communicate uncertainty in a way that elicits appropriate caution in lay users.People were much more sensitive to institutional logos associated with the outputs. Generalized institutional trust (rather than trust in the specific institution whose logo was shown) was associated with how trustworthy, accurate, and reliable the tool, its algorithm, and the numbers it produced were perceived to be. This underscores the role of societal trust in institutions at large.Finally, as a note to researchers, we found a significant effect of how hypothetical or believable participants felt the experimental scenario was. This is a variable that seems rarely controlled for in studies and yet played as much of a role as some of our variables of interest, so we suggest that it is measured in future experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Recchia
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, Department of Pure Maths and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Karin S. Moser
- UniDistance Suisse, Faculty of Psychology, Brig, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra L.J. Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, Department of Pure Maths and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Su CC, Lin YP, Yen HK, Pan YT, Zijlstra H, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Lai CY, Hu MH, Yang SH, Groot OQ. A Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting 6-Week Survival in Spinal Metastasis: An External Validation Study Using 2,768 Taiwanese Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e645-e656. [PMID: 37192422 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are predictive algorithms for predicting 3-month and 1-year survival in patients with spinal metastasis. However, advance in surgical technique, immunotherapy, and advanced radiation therapy has enabled shortening of postoperative recovery, which returns dividends to the overall quality-adjusted life-year. As such, the Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) was proposed to predict 6-week survival in patients with spinal metastasis, whereas its utility for patients treated with nonsurgical treatment was untested externally. This study aims to validate the survival prediction of the 6-week SORG-MLA for patients with spinal metastasis and provide the measurement of model consistency (MC). METHODS Discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis were conducted to assess the model's performance in the Taiwanese-based cohort. MC was also applied to detect the proportion of paradoxical predictions among 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year survival predictions. The long-term prognosis should not be better than the shorter-term prognosis in that of an individual. RESULTS The 6-week survival rate was 84.2%. The SORG-MLA retained good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.80) and good prediction accuracy with a Brier score of 0.11 (null model Brier score 0.13). There is an underestimation of the 6-week survival rate when the predicted survival rate is less than 50%. Decision curve analysis showed that the model was suitable for use over all threshold probabilities. MC showed suboptimal consistency between 6-week and 90-day survival prediction (78%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study supported the utility of the algorithm. The online tool ( https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/spinemetssurvival/ ) can be used by both clinicians and patients in informative decision-making discussion before management of spinal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chi Su
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan (Su, Lin, Hu, and Yang), the Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan (Su and Pan), the Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan (Yen), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan (Lai), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Zijlstra, Schwab, and Groot), and the Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (Zijlstra, Verlaan, and Groot)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pillai D, Narayan J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Deo S, Vijaykumar DK, Mukherjee P, Wadhwa N, Bhasin A, Mishra A, Rajanbabu A, Kannan R, Husain Z, Kumar A, Antoniou AC, Manchanda R, Menon U. Co-Creation of Breast Cancer Risk Communication Tools and an Assessment of Risk Factor Awareness: A Qualitative Study of Patients and the Public in India. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2973. [PMID: 37296935 PMCID: PMC10252022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low awareness of BC and its associated risk factors causes delays in diagnosis and impacts survival. It is critical to communicate BC risk to patients in a format that they are easily able to understand. Our study aim was to develop easy-to-follow transmedia prototypes to communicate BC risk and evaluate user preferences, alongside exploring awareness of BC and its risk factors. METHODS Prototypes of transmedia tools for risk communication were developed with multidisciplinary input. A qualitative in-depth online interview study was undertaken using a pre-defined topic guide of BC patients (7), their relatives (6), the general public (6), and health professionals (6). Interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. FINDINGS Most participants preferred pictographic representations (frequency format) of lifetime risk and risk factors and storytelling using short animations and comic strips (infographics) for communicating genetic risk and testing: "In a short time, they explained it very well, and I liked it". Suggestions included minimizing technical terminology, decreasing the delivery speed, "two-way dialogue", and using local "language for different locations". There was low awareness of BC, with some understanding of age and hereditary risk factors but limited knowledge of reproductive factors. INTERPRETATION Our findings support use of multiple context-specific multimedia tools in communicating cancer risk in an easy-to-understand way. The preference for storytelling using animations and infographics is a novel finding and should be more widely explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Pillai
- Translational Health Science & Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad—Gurgaon Expressway, Faridabad 121001, India
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | | | | | - Poulome Mukherjee
- Cachar Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Meherpur, Silchar 788015, India
| | - Nitya Wadhwa
- Translational Health Science & Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad—Gurgaon Expressway, Faridabad 121001, India
| | | | - Ashutosh Mishra
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Anupama Rajanbabu
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi 682041, India
| | - Ravi Kannan
- Cachar Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Meherpur, Silchar 788015, India
| | - Zakir Husain
- 86/1 College Street, Economics Department, Presidency University Kolkata, Kolkata 700073, India
| | | | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NH Trust, London EC1A 7BE, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nik Ab Kadir MN, Mohd Hairon S, Yaacob NM, Yusof SN, Musa KI, Yahya MM, Mohd Isa SA, Mamat Azlan MH, Ab Hadi IS. myBeST-A Web-Based Survival Prognostic Tool for Women with Breast Cancer in Malaysia: Development Process and Preliminary Validation Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2985. [PMID: 36833678 PMCID: PMC9966929 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Women with breast cancer are keen to know their predicted survival. We developed a new prognostic model for women with breast cancer in Malaysia. Using the model, this study aimed to design the user interface and develop the contents of a web-based prognostic tool for the care provider to convey survival estimates. We employed an iterative website development process which includes: (1) an initial development stage informed by reviewing existing tools and deliberation among breast surgeons and epidemiologists, (2) content validation and feedback by medical specialists, and (3) face validation and end-user feedback among medical officers. Several iterative prototypes were produced and improved based on the feedback. The experts (n = 8) highly agreed on the website content and predictors for survival with content validity indices ≥ 0.88. Users (n = 20) scored face validity indices of more than 0.90. They expressed favourable responses. The tool, named Malaysian Breast cancer Survival prognostic Tool (myBeST), is accessible online. The tool estimates an individualised five-year survival prediction probability. Accompanying contents were included to explain the tool's aim, target user, and development process. The tool could act as an additional tool to provide evidence-based and personalised breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Nasrullah Nik Ab Kadir
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Suhaily Mohd Hairon
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Najib Majdi Yaacob
- Biostatistics and Research Methodology Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Siti Norbayah Yusof
- Malaysian National Cancer Registry Department, National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya 62250, Federal Territory of Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Kamarul Imran Musa
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Maya Mazuwin Yahya
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Seoparjoo Azmel Mohd Isa
- Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | | | - Imi Sairi Ab Hadi
- Breast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kota Bharu 15586, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aubertin P, Frese T, Kasper J, Mau W, Meyer G, Mikolajczyk R, Richter M, Schildmann J, Steckelberg A. Efficacy of Three Numerical Presentation Formats on Lay People's Comprehension and Risk Perception of Fact Boxes-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2165. [PMID: 36767532 PMCID: PMC9915941 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Fact boxes present the benefits and harms of medical interventions in the form of tables. Some studies suggest that people with a lower level of education could profit more from graphic presentations. The objective of the study was to compare three different formats in fact boxes with regard to verbatim and gist knowledge in general and according to the educational background. (2) Methods: In May 2020, recruitment started for this randomized controlled trial. Participants were given one out of three presentation formats: natural frequencies, percentages, and graphic. We used Limesurvey® to assess comprehension/risk perception as the primary outcome. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used in addition to descriptive analyses. (3) Results: A total of 227 people took part in the study. Results of the groups were nearly identical in relation to the primary outcome verbatim knowledge, likewise in gist knowledge. However, participants with lower educational qualifications differed from participants with higher educational qualifications in terms of verbatim knowledge in the group percentages. (4) Conclusions: The results indicate that all three forms of presentation are suitable for conveying the content. Further research should take the individual preferences regarding the format into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Aubertin
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Thomas Frese
- Institute of General Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0176 Oslo, Norway
| | - Wilfried Mau
- Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Gabriele Meyer
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rafael Mikolajczyk
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Matthias Richter
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pilger TL, Ortolani AJM, Reis FJCDR. Physiotherapy in the prevention and treatment of upper limb complications in women with breast cancer. REVISTA CIÊNCIAS EM SAÚDE 2022. [DOI: 10.21876/rcshci.v12i2.1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the one that most affects the female population in Brazil and the world. Upper limb complications are common after cancer treatment, including conservative procedures. Old studies have already shown the effectiveness of physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of these complications. However, currently, physiotherapeutic care must be initiated from the diagnosis of the disease. Pre-rehabilitation prepares the patient to receive cancer treatment and promotes a reduction in rehabilitation time. Rehabilitation decreased the axillary cord by 57%, increased the range of motion (ROM) by 45º for flexion and 70º for shoulder abduction, the incidence of lymphedema was 11%, and there was a decrease of 3.4 points concerning pain on the Visual Scale Analog (EVA). The physical therapist should work with breast cancer to diagnose, prevent, and rehabilitate after cancer treatment, promoting functionality and quality of life for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Craddock M, Crockett C, McWilliam A, Price G, Sperrin M, van der Veer SN, Faivre-Finn C. Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Models in the Oncology Clinic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:102-113. [PMID: 34922799 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Predictive and prognostic models hold great potential to support clinical decision making in oncology and could ultimately facilitate a paradigm shift to a more personalised form of treatment. While a large number of models relevant to the field of oncology have been developed, few have been translated into clinical use and assessment of clinical utility is not currently considered a routine part of model development. In this narrative review of the clinical evaluation of prediction models in oncology, we propose a high-level process diagram for the life cycle of a clinical model, encompassing model commissioning, clinical implementation and ongoing quality assurance, which aims to bridge the gap between model development and clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Craddock
- University of Manchester, Radiotherapy Related Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK.
| | - C Crockett
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A McWilliam
- University of Manchester, Radiotherapy Related Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - G Price
- University of Manchester, Radiotherapy Related Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - M Sperrin
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - S N van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- University of Manchester, Radiotherapy Related Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Farmer GD, Pearson M, Skylark WJ, Freeman ALJ, Spiegelhalter DJ. Redevelopment of the Predict: Breast Cancer website and recommendations for developing interfaces to support decision-making. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5141-5153. [PMID: 34152085 PMCID: PMC8335820 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To develop a new interface for the widely used prognostic breast cancer tool: Predict: Breast Cancer. To facilitate decision‐making around post‐surgery breast cancer treatments. To derive recommendations for communicating the outputs of prognostic models to patients and their clinicians. Method We employed a user‐centred design process comprised of background research and iterative testing of prototypes with clinicians and patients. Methods included surveys, focus groups and usability testing. Results The updated interface now caters to the needs of a wider audience through the addition of new visualisations, instantaneous updating of results, enhanced explanatory information and the addition of new predictors and outputs. A programme of future research was identified and is now underway, including the provision of quantitative data on the adverse effects of adjuvant breast cancer treatments. Based on our user‐centred design process, we identify six recommendations for communicating the outputs of prognostic models including the need to contextualise statistics, identify and address gaps in knowledge, and the critical importance of engaging with prospective users when designing communications. Conclusions For prognostic algorithms to fulfil their potential to assist with decision‐making they need carefully designed interfaces. User‐centred design puts patients and clinicians needs at the forefront, allowing them to derive the maximum benefit from prognostic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George D Farmer
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mike Pearson
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Alexandra L J Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David J Spiegelhalter
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|