1
|
Bindels BJJ, Dronkers BEG, Smits MLJ, Verlaan JJ. Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1018-1037. [PMID: 37596998 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231196456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy of placement for cervical pedicle screws with and without the use of spinal navigation. METHODS A structured search was conducted in electronic databases without any language or date restrictions. Eligible studies reported the proportion of accurately placed cervical pedicle screws measured on intraoperative or postoperative 3D imaging, and reported whether intraoperative navigation was used during screw placement. Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of how accuracy was assessed for cervical pedicle screws. RESULTS After screening and critical appraisal, 4697 cervical pedicle screws from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws with a breach up to 2 mm was 94% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (96%). The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws placed completely in the pedicle was 76% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (82%). Intraoperative screw reposition rates and screw revision rates as a result of postoperative imaging also did not differ between navigated and non-navigated screw placement. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of spinal navigation systems does not significantly improve the accuracy of placement of cervical pedicle screws compared to screws placed without navigation. Future studies evaluating intraoperative navigation for cervical pedicle screw placement should focus on the learning curve, postoperative complications, and the complexity of surgical cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J J Bindels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B E G Dronkers
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harlianto NI, Ezzafzafi S, Foppen W, Kuperus JS, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, de Jong PA, Verlaan JJ. The prevalence of vertebral fractures in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. N Am Spine Soc J 2024; 17:100312. [PMID: 38370336 PMCID: PMC10869944 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Background Subjects with ankylosing spinal disorders, including diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are more prone to vertebral fractures and frequently present with neurological deficit compared to the patients without an ankylosed spine. Moreover, prevalent vertebral fractures are an important predictor for subsequent fracture risk. However, the pooled fracture prevalence for DISH is unknown and less recent for AS. We aimed to systematically investigate the prevalence and risk of vertebral fractures in DISH and AS populations. Methods Publications in Medline and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 until July 2023 for cohort studies reporting vertebral fractures in AS and DISH. Data on prevalence were pooled with random effects modeling after double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics and we performed subgroup analysis and meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results We included 7 studies on DISH (n = 1,193, total fractures = 231) with a pooled vertebral fracture prevalence of 22.6% (95%CI: 13.4%-33.4%). For AS, 26 studies were included (n = 2,875, total fractures = 460) with a pooled vertebral fracture prevalence of 15.2% (95%CI: 11.6%-19.1%). In general, fracture prevalence for AS remained similar for several study-level and clinically relevant characteristics, including study design, diagnostic criteria, spine level, and patient characteristics in subgroup analysis. AS publications from 2010 to 2020 showed higher fracture prevalence compared to 1990 to 2010 (18.6% vs. 11.6%). Fractures in DISH were most common at the thoracolumbar junction, whereas for AS, the most common location was the mid-thoracic spine. Conclusions Vertebral fractures are prevalent in AS and DISH populations. Differences in fracture distribution along the spinal axis exist between the 2 disorders. Additional longitudinal studies are needed for incident fracture assessment in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netanja I. Harlianto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Solaiman Ezzafzafi
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter Foppen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jonneke S. Kuperus
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pim A. de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bindels BJJ, Mercier C, Gal R, Verlaan JJ, Verhoeff JJC, Dirix P, Ost P, Kasperts N, van der Linden YM, Verkooijen HM, van der Velden JM. Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2355409. [PMID: 38345820 PMCID: PMC10862159 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported. Objective To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain. Data Sources A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT. Study Selection Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis. Results There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas J. J. Bindels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette M. van der Linden
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koole D, Lans A, Lang JH, de Groot TM, Borkhetaria P, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Tobert DG. Limited health literacy results in lower health-related quality of life in spine patients. Spine J 2024; 24:263-272. [PMID: 37774984 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spinal conditions impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient education and counseling improve HRQoL, yet the effects may be limited for patients with inadequate health literacy (HL). Despite the established relationship between HRQoL and HL in other fields, research in the orthopedic spine population is lacking. PURPOSE To investigate if limited HL results in lower HRQoL and to evaluate factors are associated with HRQoL in patients seen at an outpatient orthopedic spine center. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients 18 years of age or older seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital- based multi-surgeon outpatient spine center. OUTCOME MEASURES EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire, and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) HL assessment tool. METHODS Between October 2022 and February 2023, consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 and new to the outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation in this cross-sectional survey study. Patients completed a sociodemographic survey, EQ-5D-5L HRQoL questionnaire, and Newest Vital Sign (NVS) HL assessment tool. The EQ-5D-5L yields two continuous outcomes: an index score ranging from below 0 to 1 and a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score ranging from 0 to 100. The NVS scores were divided into limited (0-3) and adequate (4-6) HL. Multivariate linear regression with purposeful selection of variables was performed to identify independent factors associated with HRQoL. RESULTS Out of 397 eligible patients, 348 (88%) agreed to participate and were included in statistical analysis. Limited HL was independently associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores (B=1.07 [95% CI 1.00-1.15], p=.049. Other factors associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores were being obese (BMI≥30), having housing concerns, and being an active smoker. Factors associated with lower EQ-VAS scores were being underweight (BMI<18.5), obese, having housing concerns, and higher updated Charlson comorbidity index (uCCI) scores. Being married was associated with higher EQ-VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS Limited HL is associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores in spine patients, indicating lower HRQoL. To effectively apply HL-related interventions in this population, a better understanding of the complex interactions between patient characteristics, social determinants of health, and HRQoL outcomes is required. Further research should focus on interventions to improve HRQoL in patients with limited HL and how to accurately identify these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II prognostic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Koole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
| | - Julian H Lang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Tom M de Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Pranati Borkhetaria
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vercoulen TF, Niemeyer MJ, Peuker F, Verlaan JJ, Oner FC, Sadiqi S. Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A systematic review. Brain Spine 2024; 4:102745. [PMID: 38510618 PMCID: PMC10951763 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures remains controversial. To date no consensus exists on the correct choice of surgical approach and technique. Research question to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the available different surgical methods and their quantified outcomes. Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched between 2001 and 2020 using the term 'spinal fractures'. Inclusion criteria were: adults, ≥10 cases, ≥12 months follow-up, thoracic or lumbar fractures, and surgery <3 weeks of trauma. Studies were categorized per surgical technique: Posterior open (PO), posterior percutaneous (PP), stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (SA), anterior scopic (AS), anterior open (AO), posterior percutaneous and anterior open (PPAO), posterior percutaneous and anterior scopic (PPAS), posterior open and anterior open (POAO) and posterior open and anterior scopic (POAS). The PO group was used as a reference group. Results After duplicate removal 6042 articles were identified. A total of 102 articles were Included, in which 137 separate surgical technique cohorts were described: PO (n = 75), PP, (n = 39), SA (n = 12), AO (n = 5), PPAO (n = 1), PPAS (n = 1), POAO (n = 2) and POAS (n = 2). Discussion and conclusion For type A3/A4 burst fractures, without severe neurological deficit, posterior percutaneous (PP) technique seems the safest and most feasible option in the past two decades. If needed, PP can be combined with anterior augmentation to prevent secondary kyphosis. Furthermore, posterior open (PO) technique is feasible in almost all types of fractures. Also, this technique can provide for an additional posterior decompression or fusion. Overall, no neurologic deterioration was reported following surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timon F.G. Vercoulen
- Diakonessenhuis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582, KE, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Menco J.S. Niemeyer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Peuker
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F. Cumhur Oner
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Said Sadiqi
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Te Velde JP, Zijlstra H, Lans A, Patel CG, Raje N, Delawi D, Kempen DHR, Verlaan JJ, van Royen BJ, Schwab JH. Fracture rate after conventional external beam radiation therapy to the spine in multiple myeloma patients. Spine J 2024; 24:137-145. [PMID: 37734495 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) is used in multiple myeloma (MM) to treat severe pain, spinal cord compression, and disease-related bone disease. However, radiation may be associated with an increased risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), which could substantially impair survival and quality of life. Additionally, the use of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in MM is debated in MM. PURPOSE To determine the incidence of VCFs after cEBRT in patients with MM and to assess the applicability of the SINS score in the prediction of VCFs in MM. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective multicenter cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE MM patients with spinal myeloma lesions who underwent cEBRT between January 2010 and December 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of new or progressed VCFs and subdistribution hazard ratios for potentially associated factors. METHODS Patient and treatment characteristics were manually collected from the patients' electronic medical records. Computed tomography (CT) scans from before and up to 3 years after the start of radiation were used to score radiographic variables at baseline and at follow-up. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the SINS score to predict the postradiation VCF rate. RESULTS A total of 127 patients with 427 eligible radiated vertebrae were included in this study. The mean age at radiation was 64 years, and 66.1% of them were male. At the start of radiation, 57 patients (44.9%) had at least one VCF. There were 89 preexisting VCFs (18.4% of 483 vertebrae). Overall, 39 of 127 patients (30.7%) reported new fractures (number of vertebrae (n)=12) or showed progression of existing fractures (n=36). This number represented 11.2% of all radiated vertebrae. Five of the 39 (12.8%) patients with new or worsened VCFs received an unplanned secondary treatment (augmentation [n=2] or open surgery [n=3]) within 3 years. Both the total SINS score (SHR 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.03; p<.001) and categorical SINS score (SHR 10.83; 95% CI 4.20-27.94; p<.001) showed an independent association with higher rates of new or progressed VCFs in adjusted analyses. The use of bisphosphonates was independently associated with a lower rate of new or progressed VCFs (SHR 0.47 [95% CI 0.24-0.92; p=.027]). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that new or progressed VCFs occurred in 30.7% of patients within 3 years, in a total of 11.2% of vertebrae. The SINS score was found to be independently associated with the development or progression of VCFs and could thus be applied in MM for fracture prediction and possibly prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens P Te Velde
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Noopur Raje
- Department of Hematology/Oncology - Center for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Diyar Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik H R Kempen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barend J van Royen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zijlstra H, Pierik RJ, Crawford AM, Tobert DG, Wolterbeek N, Oosterhoff JHF, Delawi D, Terpstra WE, Kempen DHR, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Analysis of complications and revisions after spine surgery in 270 multiple myeloma patients with spinal involvement. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:4335-4354. [PMID: 37707603 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07903-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at increased risk of infections and suffer from poor bone quality due to their disseminated malignant bone disease. Therefore, postoperative complications may occur following surgical treatment of MM lesions. PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of postoperative complications and retreatments after spinal surgery in MM patients. Additionally, we sought to identify risk factors associated with complications and retreatments. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE In total, 270 patients with MM who received surgical treatment for spinal involvement between 2008 and 2021 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES The incidence of perioperative complications within 6 weeks and reoperations within 2.5 years and individual odds ratios for factors associated with these complications and reoperations. METHODS Data were collected through manual chart review. Hosmer and Lemeshow's purposeful regression method was used to identify risk factors for complications and reoperations. RESULTS The median age of our cohort was 65 years (SD = 10.8), and 58% were male (n = 57). Intraoperative complications were present in 24 patients (8.9%). The overall 6-week complication rate after surgery was 35% (n = 95). The following variables were independently associated with 6-week complications: higher Genant grading of a present vertebral fracture (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.04-1.95; p = .031), receiving intramuscular or intravenous steroids within a week prior to surgery (OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.79-9.06; p = .001), decompression surgery without fusion (OR 6.53; 95% CI 1.30-36.86; p = .026), higher creatinine levels (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.19-5.60; p = .014), and lower calcium levels (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.88; p = .013). A secondary surgery was indicated for 53 patients (20%), of which 13 (4.8%) took place within two weeks after the initial surgery. We additionally discovered factors associated with retreatments, which are elucidated within the manuscript. CONCLUSION The goal of surgical treatment for MM bone disease is to enhance patient quality of life and reduce symptom burden. However, postoperative complication rates remain relatively high after spine surgery in patients with MM, likely attributable to both inherent characteristics of the disease and patient comorbidities. The risk for complications and secondary surgeries should be explored and a multidisciplinary approach is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - R J Pierik
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - A M Crawford
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - D G Tobert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - N Wolterbeek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J H F Oosterhoff
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - D Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W E Terpstra
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D H R Kempen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Versteeg AL, Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Reichl L, Tsang A, Aludino A, Sahgal A, Verlaan JJ, Fisher CG, Verkooijen HM. Introducing the New Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology Questionnaire. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:1331-1338. [PMID: 37409831 PMCID: PMC10627642 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES It has been hypothesized that a discrepancy between pretreatment expectations and perceived outcomes is a significant source of patient dissatisfaction. Currently, there is lack in understanding and tools to assess patient expectations regarding the outcomes of treatment for spinal metastases. The objective of this study was therefore to develop a patient expectations questionnaire regarding the outcomes after surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases. METHODS A multiphase international qualitative study was conducted. Phase 1 of the study included semistructured interviews with patients and relatives to understand their expectations of the outcomes of treatment. In addition, physicians were interviewed about their communication practices with patients regarding treatment and expected outcomes. In phase 2, items were developed based on the results of the interviews in phase 1. In phase 3, patients were interviewed to validate the content and language of the questionnaire. Selection of the final items was based on feedback from patients regarding content, language, and relevance. RESULTS In phase 1, 24 patients and 22 physicians were included. A total of 34 items were developed for the preliminary questionnaire. After phase 3, a total of 22 items were retained for the final version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is divided into 3 sections: (1) patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes, (2) prognosis, and (3) consultation with the physician. The items cover expectations related to pain, analgesia requirements, daily and physical function, overall quality of life, life expectancy, and information provided by the physician. CONCLUSION The new Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology questionnaire was developed to evaluate patient expectations regarding the outcomes after treatment for spinal metastases. The Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology questionnaire will allow physicians to systematically assess patient expectations of planned treatment and thus help guide patients toward realistic expectations of treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L. Versteeg
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leilani Reichl
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angela Tsang
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Allan Aludino
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre & Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles G. Fisher
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Su CC, Lin YP, Yen HK, Pan YT, Zijlstra H, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Lai CY, Hu MH, Yang SH, Groot OQ. A Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting 6-Week Survival in Spinal Metastasis: An External Validation Study Using 2,768 Taiwanese Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e645-e656. [PMID: 37192422 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are predictive algorithms for predicting 3-month and 1-year survival in patients with spinal metastasis. However, advance in surgical technique, immunotherapy, and advanced radiation therapy has enabled shortening of postoperative recovery, which returns dividends to the overall quality-adjusted life-year. As such, the Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) was proposed to predict 6-week survival in patients with spinal metastasis, whereas its utility for patients treated with nonsurgical treatment was untested externally. This study aims to validate the survival prediction of the 6-week SORG-MLA for patients with spinal metastasis and provide the measurement of model consistency (MC). METHODS Discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis were conducted to assess the model's performance in the Taiwanese-based cohort. MC was also applied to detect the proportion of paradoxical predictions among 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year survival predictions. The long-term prognosis should not be better than the shorter-term prognosis in that of an individual. RESULTS The 6-week survival rate was 84.2%. The SORG-MLA retained good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.80) and good prediction accuracy with a Brier score of 0.11 (null model Brier score 0.13). There is an underestimation of the 6-week survival rate when the predicted survival rate is less than 50%. Decision curve analysis showed that the model was suitable for use over all threshold probabilities. MC showed suboptimal consistency between 6-week and 90-day survival prediction (78%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study supported the utility of the algorithm. The online tool ( https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/spinemetssurvival/ ) can be used by both clinicians and patients in informative decision-making discussion before management of spinal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chi Su
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan (Su, Lin, Hu, and Yang), the Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan (Su and Pan), the Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan (Yen), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan (Lai), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Zijlstra, Schwab, and Groot), and the Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (Zijlstra, Verlaan, and Groot)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zijlstra H, Striano BM, Crawford AM, Groot OQ, Raje N, Tobert DG, Patel CG, Wolterbeek N, Delawi D, Kempen DHR, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Neurologic Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Severe Spinal Cord Compression in Multiple Myeloma: A Study of 162 Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1261-1269. [PMID: 37262176 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone destruction is the most frequent disease-defining clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeletal-related events such as back pain, pathological fractures, or neurologic compromise including epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). Up to 24% of patients with MM will be affected by ESCC. Radiation therapy has been proven to be highly effective in pain relief in patients with MM. However, a critical knowledge gap remains with regard to neurologic outcomes in patients with high-grade ESCC treated with radiation. METHODS We retrospectively included 162 patients with MM and high-grade ESCC (grade 2 or 3) who underwent radiation therapy of the spine between January 2010 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score after 12 to 24 months, or the last known ASIA score if the patient had had a repeat treatment or died. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with poor neurologic outcomes after radiation, defined as neurologic deterioration or lack of improvement. RESULTS After radiation therapy, 34 patients (21%) had no improvement in their impaired neurologic function and 27 (17%) deteriorated neurologically. Thirty-six patients (22%) underwent either surgery or repeat irradiation after the initial radiation therapy. There were 100 patients who were neurologically intact at baseline (ASIA score of E), of whom 16 (16%) had neurologic deterioration. Four variables were independently associated with poor neurologic outcomes: baseline ASIA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.70 to 17.38; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR = 6.19; 95% CI = 1.49 to 29.49; p = 0.015), number of levels affected by ESCC (OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.19 to 14.18; p = 0.026), and receiving steroids prior to radiation (OR = 4.42; 95% CI = 1.41 to 16.10; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that 38% of patients deteriorated or did not improve neurologically after radiation therapy for high-grade ESCC. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary input and efforts in the treatment of high-grade ESCC in patients with MM. Future studies will help to improve patient selection for specific and standardized treatments and to clearly delineate which patients are likely to benefit from radiation therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B M Striano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A M Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - O Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N Raje
- Department of Hematology/Oncology-Center for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - D G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - C G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - N Wolterbeek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D H R Kempen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zijlstra H, Crawford AM, Striano BM, Pierik RJ, Tobert DG, Wolterbeek N, Delawi D, Terpstra WE, Kempen DHR, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Neurological Outcomes and the Need for Retreatments Among Multiple Myeloma Patients With High-Grade Spinal Cord Compression: Radiotherapy vs Surgery. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231188816. [PMID: 37452005 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231188816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Up to 30% of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients are expected to experience Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) during the course of their disease. To prevent irreversible neurological damage, timely diagnosis and treatment are important. However, debate remains regarding the optimal treatment regimen. The aim of this study was to investigate the neurological outcomes and frequency of retreatments for MM patients undergoing isolated radiotherapy and surgical interventions for high-grade (grade 2-3) ESCC. METHODS This study included patients with MM and high-grade ESCC treated with isolated radiotherapy or surgery. Pre- and post-treatment American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and retreatment rate were compared between the 2 groups. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression was utilized to examine differences in neurologic compromise, pain, and retreatments. RESULTS A total of 247 patients were included (Radiotherapy: n = 154; Surgery: n = 93). After radiotherapy, 82 patients (53%) achieved full neurologic function (ASIA E) at the end of follow-up. Of the surgically treated patients, 67 (64%) achieved full neurologic function. In adjusted analyses, patients treated with surgery were less likely to experience neurologic deterioration within 2 years (OR = .15; 95%CI .05-.44; P = .001) and had less pain (OR = .29; 95%CI .11-.74; P = .010). Surgical treatment was not associated with an increased risk of retreatments (OR = .64; 95%CI .28-1.47; P = .29) or death (HR = .62, 95%CI .28-1.38; P = .24). CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for baseline differences, surgically treated patients with high-grade ESCC showed better neurologic outcomes compared to patients treated with radiotherapy. There were no differences in risk of retreatment or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander M Crawford
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert-Jan Pierik
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nienke Wolterbeek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Diyar Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim E Terpstra
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsai CC, Huang CC, Lin CW, Ogink PT, Su CC, Chen SF, Yen MH, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Wang CT, Groot OQ, Hu MH, Chiang H. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group Machine Learning Algorithm (SORG-MLA) for predicting prolonged postoperative opioid prescription after total knee arthroplasty: an international validation study using 3,495 patients from a Taiwanese cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:553. [PMID: 37408033 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06667-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative prediction of prolonged postoperative opioid use (PPOU) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could identify high-risk patients for increased surveillance. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) has been tested internally while lacking external support to assess its generalizability. The aims of this study were to externally validate this algorithm in an Asian cohort and to identify other potential independent factors for PPOU. METHODS In a tertiary center in Taiwan, 3,495 patients receiving TKA from 2010-2018 were included. Baseline characteristics were compared between the external validation cohort and the original developmental cohorts. Discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] and precision-recall curve [AUPRC]), calibration, overall performance (Brier score), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the model performance. A multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate other potential prognostic factors. RESULTS There were notable differences in baseline characteristics between the validation and the development cohort. Despite these variations, the SORG-MLA ( https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/tjaopioid/ ) remained its good discriminatory ability (AUROC, 0.75; AUPRC, 0.34) and good overall performance (Brier score, 0.029; null model Brier score, 0.032). The algorithm could bring clinical benefit in DCA while somewhat overestimating the probability of prolonged opioid use. Preoperative acetaminophen use was an independent factor to predict PPOU (odds ratio, 2.05). CONCLUSIONS The SORG-MLA retained its discriminatory ability and good overall performance despite the different pharmaceutical regulations. The algorithm could be used to identify high-risk patients and tailor personalized prevention policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Chen Tsai
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Ching Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wei Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Paul T Ogink
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chih-Chi Su
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Fu Chen
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Mao-Hsu Yen
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Chen-Ti Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Hongsen Chiang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Birk M, Sidhu K, Filezio MR, Singh V, Ferri-de-Barros F, Chan V, Shumilak G, Nataraj A, Langston H, Yee NJ, Iorio C, Shkumat N, Rocos B, Ertl-Wagner B, Lebel D, Camp MW, Dimentberg E, Saran N, Laflamme M, Ouellet JA, Wenghofer J, Livock H, Beaton L, Tice A, Smit K, Graham R, Duarte MP, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Barchi S, Parent S, Gholamian T, Livock H, Tice A, Smit K, Yoon S, Zulfiqar A, Rocos B, Murphy A, Bath N, Moll S, Sorbara J, Lebel D, Camp MW, Nallet JA, Rocos B, Lebel DE, Zeller R, Dermott JA, Kim DJ, Anthony A, Zeller R, Lebel DE, Wang Z, Shen J, Kamel Y, Liu J, Shedid D, Al-Shakfa F, Yuh SJ, Boubez G, Rizkallah M, Rizkallah M, Shen J, Boubez G, Kamel Y, Liu J, Shedid D, Al-Shakfa F, Lavoie F, Yug SJ, Wang Z, Alavi F, Nielsen C, Rampersaud R, Lewis S, Cheung AM, Cadieux C, Fernandes R, Brzozowski P, Zdero R, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Cherry A, Manoharan R, Xu M, Srikandarajah N, Iorio C, Raj A, Nielsen C, Rampersaud R, Lewis S, Beange K, Graham R, Livock H, Smit K, Manoharan R, Cherry A, Srikandarajah N, Raj A, Xu M, Iorio C, Nielsen CJ, Rampersaud YR, Lewis SJ, Nasrabadi AAM, Moammer G, Phee JM, Walker T, Urquhart JC, Glennie RA, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG, Bailey CS, Herrington BJ, Fernandes RR, Urquhart JC, Rasoulinejad P, Siddiqi F, Bailey CS, Urquhart J, Fernandes RR, Glennie RA, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG, Bailey CS, Yang MMH, Riva-Cambrin J, Cunningham J, Casha S, Cadieux CN, Urquhart J, Fernandes R, Glennie A, Fisher C, Rampersaud R, Xu M, Manoharan R, Cherry A, Raj A, Srikandarajah N, Iorio C, Nielsen C, Lewis S, Rampersaud R, Cherry A, Raj A, McIntosh G, Manoharan R, Murray JC, Nielsen C, Xu M, Srikandarajah N, Iorio C, Perruccio A, Canizares M, Rampersaud R, El-Mughayyar D, Bigney E, Richardson E, Manson N, Abraham E, Attabib N, Small C, Kolyvas G, LeRoux A, Outcomes CS, Investigators RN, Hebert J, Baisamy V, Rizkallah M, Shen J, Cresson T, Vazquez C, Wang Z, Boubez G, Lung T, Canizares M, Perruccio A, Rampersaud R, Crawford EJ, Ravinsky RA, Perruccio AV, Rampersaud YR, Coyte PC, Bond M, Street J, Fisher C, Charest-Morin R, Sutherland JM, Bartolozzi AR, Barzilai O, Chou D, Laufer I, Verlaan JJ, Sahgal A, Rhines LD, Scuibba DM, Lazary A, Weber MH, Schuster JM, Boriani S, Bettegowda C, Arnold PM, Clarke MJ, Fehlings MG, Reynolds JJ, Gokaslan ZL, Fisher CG, Dea N, Versteeg AL, Charest-Morin R, Laufer I, Teixeira W, Barzilai O, Gasbarrini A, Fehlings MG, Chou D, Johnson MG, Gokaslan ZL, Dea N, Verlaan JJ, Goldschlager T, Shin JH, O'Toole JE, Sciubba DM, Bettegowda C, Clarke MJ, Weber MH, Mesfin A, Kawahara N, Goodwin R, Disch A, Lazary A, Boriani S, Sahgal A, Rhines L, Fisher CG, Versteeg AL, Gal R, Reich L, Tsang A, Aludino A, Sahgal A, Verlaan JJ, Fisher CG, Verkooijen L, Rizkallah M, Wang Z, Yuh SJ, Shedid D, Shen J, Al-Shakfa F, Belguendouz C, AlKafi R, Boubez G, MacLean MA, Georgiopoulos M, Charest-Morin R, Germscheid N, Goodwin CR, Weber M, International AS, Rizkallah M, Boubez G, Zhang H, Al-Shakfa F, Brindamour P, Boule D, Shen J, Shedid D, Yuh SJ, Wang Z, Correale MR, Soever LJ, Rampersaud R, Malic CC, Dubreuil M, Duke K, Kingwell SP, Lin Z, MacLean MA, Julien LC, Patriquin G, LeBlanc J, Green R, Alant J, Barry S, Glennie RA, Oxney W, Christie SD, Sarraj M, Alqahtani A, Thornley P, Koziarz F, Bailey CS, Freire-Archer M, Bhanot K, Kachur E, Bhandari M, Oitment C, Malhotra AK, Balas M, Jaja BNR, Harrington EM, Hofereiter J, Jaffe RH, He Y, Byrne JP, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Brittain KCM, Christie S, Pillai S, Dvorak MF, Evaniew N, Chen M, Waheed Z, Rotem-Kohavi N, Fallah N, Noonan VK, Fisher CG, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Ailon T, Street J, Kwon BK, Sandarage RV, Galuta A, Ghinda D, Kwan JCS, TsaI EC, Hachem LD, Hong J, Velumian A, Mothe AJ, Tator CH, Fehlings MG, Shakil H, Jaja BNR, Zhang P, Jaffe R, Malhotra AK, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Rotem-Kohavi N, Dvorak MF, Dea N, Evaniew N, Chen M, Waheed Z, Xu J, Fallah N, Noonan V, Kwon B, Dandurand C, Muijs S, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Cumhur, Ouml Ner, Greene R, Furlong B, Smith-Forrester J, Swab M, Christie SD, Hall A, Leck E, Marshall E, Christie S, Dvorak MF, Cumhur F, Ouml Ner, Vaccaro AR, Benneker LM, Rajasekaran S, El-Sharkawi M, Popescu EC, Tee JW, Paquet J, France JC, Allen R, Lavelle WF, Hirschfeld M, Pneumaticos S, Dandurand C, Cumhur, Ouml Ner, Muijs S, Schnake K, Dvorak M, Fernandes RR, Thornley P, Urquhart J, Kelly S, Alenezi N, Alahmari A, Siddiqi F, Singh S, Rasoulinejad P, Bailey C, Evaniew N, Burger LD, Dea N, Cadotte DW, McIntosh G, Jacobs B, St-Laurent-Lebeux L, Bourassa-Moreau É, Sarraj M, Majeed M, Guha D, Pahuta M, Laflamme M, McIntosh G, Dea N, Bak AB, Alvi MA, Moghaddamjou A, Fehlings MG, Silva YGMD, Goulet J, McIntosh G, Bedard S, Pimenta N, Blanchard J, Couture J, LaRue B, Investigators C, Adams T, Cunningham E, El-Mughayyar D, Bigney E, Vandewint A, Manson N, Abraham E, Small C, Attabib N, Richardson E, Hebert J, Bond M, Street J, Fisher C, Charest-Morin R, Sutherland JM, Hillier T, Bailey CS, Fisher C, Rampersaud R, Koto P, Glennie RA, Soroceanu A, Nicholls F, Thomas K, Evaniew N, Lewkonia P, Bouchard J, Jacobs B, Ben-Israel D, Crawford EJ, Fisher C, Dea N, Spackman E, Rampersaud R, Thomas KC, Srikandarajah N, Murray JC, Nielsen C, Manoharan R, Cherry A, Raj A, Xu M, Iorio C, Bailey C, Dea N, Fisher C, Hall H, Manson N, Thomas K, Canizares M, Rampersaud YR, Urquhart J, Fernandes RR, Glennie RA, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG, Bailey C, Yang MMH, Far R, Sajobi T, Riva-Cambrin J, Casha S, Bond M, Street J, Fisher C, Charest-Morin R, Sutherland JM, Silva Y, Pimenta NG, LaRue B, Bedard S, Oviedo SC, Goulet J, Couture J, Blanchard J, McDonald J, Al-Jahdali F, Urquhart J, Alahmari A, Rampersaud R, Fisher C, Bailey C, Glennie A, Evaniew N, Coyle M, Rampersaud YR, Bailey CS, Jacobs WB, Cadotte DW, Thomas KC, Attabib N, Paquet J, Nataraj A, Christie SD, Weber MH, Phan P, Charest-Morin R, Fisher CG, Hall H, McIntosh G, Dea N, Malhotra AK, Davis AM, He Y, Harrington EM, Jaja BNR, Zhu MP, Shakil H, Dea N, Jacobs WB, Cadotte DW, Paquet J, Weber MH, Phan P, Christie SD, Nataraj A, Bailey CS, Johnson MG, Fisher CG, Manson N, Rampersaud YR, Thomas KC, Hall H, Fehlings MG, Ahn H, Ginsberg HJ, Witiw CD, Wilson JR, Althagafi A, McIntosh G, Charest-Morin R, Rizzuto MA, Ailon T, Dea N, Evaniew N, Jacobs BW, Paquet J, Rampersaud R, Hall H, Bailey CS, Weber M, Johnson MG, Nataraj A, Attabib N, Cadotte DW, Manson N, Stratton A, Christie SD, Thomas KC, Wilson JR, Fisher CG, Charest-Morin R, Bak AB, Alvi MA, Moghaddamjou A, Fehlings MG, Bak AB, Alvi MA, Moghaddamjou A, Fehlings MG, Soroceanu A, Nicholls F, Thomas K, Evaniew N, Salo P, Bouchard J, Jacobs B, Dandurand C, Laghaei PF, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon BK, Paquette S, Street J, Soroceanu A, Nicholls F, Thomas K, Evaniew N, Bouchard J, Salo P, Jacobs B, Varshney VP, Sahjpaul R, Paquette S, Osborn J, Bak AB, Moghaddamjou A, Fehlings MG, Leck E, Marshall E, Christie S, Elkaim LM, Lasry OJ, Raj A, Murray JC, Cherry A, McIntosh G, Nielsen C, Srikandarajah N, Manoharan R, Iorio C, Xu M, Perruccio A, Canizares M, Rampersaud YR, Stratton A, Tierney S, Wai EK, Phan P, Kingwell S, Magnan MC, Soroceanu A, Nicholls F, Thomas K, Evaniew N, Salo P, Bouchard J, Jacobs B, Spanninga B, Hoelen TCA, Johnson S, Arts JJC, Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Glennie RA, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG, Levett JJ, Elkaim LM, Alotaibi NM, Weber MH, Dea N, Abd-El-Barr MM, Cherry A, Yee A, Jaber N, Fehlings M, Cunningham E, Adams T, El-Mughayyar D, Bigney E, Vandewint A, Manson N, Abraham E, Small C, Attabib N, Richardson E, Hebert J, Werier J, Smit K, Villeneuve J, Sachs A, Abdelbary H, Al-Mosuli YK, Rakhra K, Phan P, Nagata K, Gum JL, Brown ME, Daniels CL, Carreon LY, Bonello JP, Koucheki R, Abbas A, Lex J, Nucci N, Whyne C, Larouche J, Ahn H, Finkelstein J, Lewis S, Toor J, Lee NJ, Orosz LD, Gum JL, Poulter GT, Jazini E, Haines CM, Good CR, Lehman RA, Crawford EJ, Ravinsky RA, Perruccio AV, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR, Freire-Archer M, Sarraj M, AlShaalan F, Koziarz A, Thornley P, Alnemari H, Oitment C, Bharadwaj L, El-Mughayyar D, Bigney E, Manson N, Abraham E, Small C, Attabib N, Richardson E, Kearney J, Kundap U, Investigators C, Hebert J, Elkaim LM, Levett JJ, Niazi F, Bokhari R, Alotaibi NM, Lasry OJ, Bissonnette V, Yen D, Muddaluru VS, Gandhi P, Mastrolonardo A, Guha D, Pahuta MA, Christie SD, Vandertuin T, Ritcey G, Rainham D, Alhawsawi M, Mumtaz R, Abdelnour M, Qumquji F, Soroceanu A, Swamy G, Thomas K, Wai E, Phan P, Bhatt FR, Orosz LD, Yamout T, Good CR, Schuler TC, Nguyen T, Jazini E, Haines CM, Oppermann M, Gupta S, Ramjist J, Oppermann PS, Yang VXD, Levett JJ, Elkaim LM, Niazi F, Weber MH, Ioro-Morin C, Bonizzato M, Weil AG, Oppermann M, Ramjist J, Gupta S, Oppermann PS, Yang VXD, Jung Y, Muddalaru V, Gandhi P, Guha D, Koucheki R, Bonello JP, Abbas A, Lex JR, Nucci N, Whyne C, Yee A, Ahn H, Finkelstein J, Larouche J, Lewis S, Toor J, Dhawan A, Dhawan J, Sharma AN, Azzam DB, Cherry A, Fehlings MG, Orosz LD, Lee NJ, Yamout T, Gum JL, Lehman RA, Poulter GT, Haines CM, Jazini E, Good CR, Ridha BB, Persad A, Fourney D, Byers E, Gallagher M, Sugar J, Brown JL, Wang Z, Shen J, Boubez G, Al-Shakfa F, Yuh SJ, Shedid D, Rizkallah M, Singh M, Singh PK, Lawrence PL, Dell S, Goodluck-Tyndall R, Wade K, Morgan M, Bruce C, Silva YGMD, Pimenta N, LaRue B, Aldakhil S, Blanchard J, Couture J, Goulet J, Bednar DA, Raj R, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Christie SD, Greene R, Chaves JPG, Zarrabian M, Sigurdson L, Manoharan R, Cherry A, Iorio C, Srikandarajah N, Xu M, Raj A, Nielsen CJ, Rampersaud YR, Lewis SJ. Canadian Spine Society: 23rd Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, March 1 - Saturday, March 4, Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Québec, Que., Canada. Can J Surg 2023; 66:S1-S53. [PMID: 37567613 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.006523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Vivien Chan
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
- UCLA Health, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Geoffrey Shumilak
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Andrew Nataraj
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | | | - Nicholas J Yee
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | - David Lebel
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mark W Camp
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Neil Saran
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | - Jean A Ouellet
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | - Holly Livock
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Luke Beaton
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Andrew Tice
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kevin Smit
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Ryan Graham
- Health Science Department, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Matias Pereira Duarte
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | | | | | - Julie Joncas
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
| | - Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Hubert Labelle
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Soraya Barchi
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
| | - Stefan Parent
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Que
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Tara Gholamian
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Holly Livock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Andrew Tice
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kevin Smit
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Samuel Yoon
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Lebel
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mark W Camp
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chloe Cadieux
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Renan Fernandes
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | | | - Radovan Zdero
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Chris Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Parham Rasoulinejad
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kristen Beange
- Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Ryan Graham
- Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Ottawa, Ont
- School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Holly Livock
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kevin Smit
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gemah Moammer
- Grand River Hospital, Waterloo, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - John Mc Phee
- Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont
| | - Taryn Walker
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthpaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Jennifer C Urquhart
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthpaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - R Andrew Glennie
- Departments of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Chris S Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthpaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Brandon J Herrington
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Renan R Fernandes
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Jennifer C Urquhart
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
| | - Parham Rasoulinejad
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
| | - Fawaz Siddiqi
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
| | - Christopher S Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic spine program, London, Ont
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
| | - Jennifer Urquhart
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Renan R Fernandes
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - R Andrew Glennie
- Departments of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Chris S Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Michael M H Yang
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
- O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jay Riva-Cambrin
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | | | - Steven Casha
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Chloe N Cadieux
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | | | - Renan Fernandes
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Andrew Glennie
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | | | | | | | - Mark Xu
- Krembil Research Institute Arthritis Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dana El-Mughayyar
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Department of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Erin Bigney
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Department of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Eden Richardson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
- Saint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, N.B
| | - Edward Abraham
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
- Saint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, N.B
| | - Najmedden Attabib
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Chris Small
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
- Saint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, N.B
| | - George Kolyvas
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Andre LeRoux
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | | | | | - Jeff Hebert
- Department of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
| | | | | | - Jesse Shen
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | | | | | - Zhi Wang
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Ghassan Boubez
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Tiffany Lung
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mayilee Canizares
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Anthony Perruccio
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Eric J Crawford
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Robert A Ravinsky
- Department of Orthopaedics & Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C
| | - Anthony V Perruccio
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Y Raja Rampersaud
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Michael Bond
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - John Street
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Arthur R Bartolozzi
- Combined Neurological and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Ori Barzilai
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | - Dean Chou
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | - Ilya Laufer
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Aron Lazary
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | - Michael H Weber
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefano Boriani
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul M Arnold
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurological and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
- AO Foundation, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | | | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Ilya Laufer
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, N.Y
| | - William Teixeira
- Department of Orthopedic, Spine Surgery Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ori Barzilai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, N.Y
| | | | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Tony Goldschlager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Mass
| | - John E O'Toole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University, Chicago, Ill
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, N.Y
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | | | - Michael H Weber
- Spine Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, Montréal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que
| | - Addisu Mesfin
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y
| | - Norio Kawahara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Division, Duke University, Durham, N.C
| | - Alexander Disch
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Aron Lazary
- National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Laurence Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, Tex
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Anne L Versteeg
- Division of Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leilani Reich
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Angela Tsang
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Allan Aludino
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Lenny Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark A MacLean
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | | | | | - C Rory Goodwin
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, N.C
| | - Michael Weber
- Combined Neurological and Orthopedic Spine Program, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcia Rebecca Correale
- University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Leslie Jayne Soever
- University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mohamed Sarraj
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | - Patrick Thornley
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Frank Koziarz
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | | | | | - Edward Kachur
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Colby Oitment
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Armaan K Malhotra
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Michael Balas
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Blessing N R Jaja
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Erin M Harrington
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Johann Hofereiter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Rachael H Jaffe
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Yingshi He
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - James P Byrne
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christopher D Witiw
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | - Marcel F Dvorak
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raphaële Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Tamir Ailon
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - John Street
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Brian K Kwon
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Ryan V Sandarage
- Neurosurgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Ahmad Galuta
- Neurosurgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | - Jason C S Kwan
- Neurosurgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Eve C TsaI
- Neurosurgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Laureen D Hachem
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - James Hong
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Alexander Velumian
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Andrea J Mothe
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Charles H Tator
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Husain Shakil
- Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | - Rachael Jaffe
- Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Armaan K Malhotra
- Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christopher D Witiw
- Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Marcel F Dvorak
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Melody Chen
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Jijie Xu
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | - Brian Kwon
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charlotte Dandurand
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Sander Muijs
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marcel Dvorak
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Klaus Schnake
- Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
| | | | - Ouml Ner
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ryan Greene
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
- Neurosurgery Division, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L
| | - Bradley Furlong
- Neurosurgery Division, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L
| | | | - Michelle Swab
- Neurosurgery Division, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L
| | - Sean D Christie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Amanda Hall
- Neurosurgery Division, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L
| | | | | | | | - Marcel F Dvorak
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Ouml Ner
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jin Wee Tee
- Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - John C France
- Orthopedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W.V
| | - Richard Allen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| | | | | | | | - Charlotte Dandurand
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Ouml Ner
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sander Muijs
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Klaus Schnake
- Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Marcel Dvorak
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mathieu Laflamme
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Julien Goulet
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Sonia Bedard
- Neurosurgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Newton Pimenta
- Neurosurgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Jocelyn Blanchard
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Jerome Couture
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Bernard LaRue
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | | | - Tyler Adams
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Erin Cunningham
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Dana El-Mughayyar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Erin Bigney
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Amanda Vandewint
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
| | - Niel Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Edward Abraham
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Chris Small
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Najmedden Attabib
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Eden Richardson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Jeffery Hebert
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
| | - Michael Bond
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - John Street
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Troy Hillier
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Chris S Bailey
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - R Andrew Glennie
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Ben-Israel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Eric J Crawford
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Eldon Spackman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kenneth C Thomas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | | | | | | | | | - Ahmed Cherry
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Aditiya Raj
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mark Xu
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Carlo Iorio
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Chris Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charles Fisher
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Hamilton Hall
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Kenneth Thomas
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Mayilee Canizares
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
- Arthritis Program, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Yoga Raja Rampersaud
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Jennifer Urquhart
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Renan R Fernandes
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - R Andrew Glennie
- Departments of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Chris Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Michael M H Yang
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
- O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Calgary, Alta
| | - Rena Far
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Tolulope Sajobi
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jay Riva-Cambrin
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Steven Casha
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Michael Bond
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - John Street
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James McDonald
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L
| | | | | | - Abdulmajeed Alahmari
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Charles Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Chris Bailey
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Andrew Glennie
- Division of Orthopedics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Matthew Coyle
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | | | | | - W Bradley Jacobs
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - David W Cadotte
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Kenneth C Thomas
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | | | - Jérôme Paquet
- Department of Surgery, Université de Québec, Québec, Que
| | - Andrew Nataraj
- Neurosurgery Division, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Sean D Christie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Michael H Weber
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Philippe Phan
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Raphaële Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Hamilton Hall
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Armaan K Malhotra
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Aileen M Davis
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Yingshi He
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Erin M Harrington
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Blessing N R Jaja
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mary P Zhu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Husain Shakil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - W Bradley Jacobs
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - David W Cadotte
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jérôme Paquet
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Michael H Weber
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | - Sean D Christie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Andrew Nataraj
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Christopher S Bailey
- Division of Orthopaedics, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont
| | - Michael G Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John Orthopedics, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
| | - Y Raja Rampersaud
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kenneth C Thomas
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Hamilton Hall
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Henry Ahn
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Howard J Ginsberg
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christopher D Witiw
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John Orthopedics, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
| | - Alwalaa Althagafi
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Raphaële Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Michael A Rizzuto
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Tamir Ailon
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | - Bradley W Jacobs
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jerome Paquet
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Raja Rampersaud
- Divisions of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Hamilton Hall
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christopher S Bailey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Michael Weber
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que
| | - Michael G Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| | - Andrew Nataraj
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Najmedden Attabib
- Canada East Spine Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, Zone 2, Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - David W Cadotte
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John Orthopedics, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John Campus, Saint John, N.B
| | | | - Sean D Christie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | - Kenneth C Thomas
- Divisions of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vishal P Varshney
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, B.C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Ramesh Sahjpaul
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, B.C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Scott Paquette
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, B.C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | - Jill Osborn
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, B.C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Greg McIntosh
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Xu
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | | - Alexandra Stratton
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sarah Tierney
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Eugene K Wai
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Philippe Phan
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Stephen Kingwell
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Barend Spanninga
- Laboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
| | - Thomáy-Claire A Hoelen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
| | | | - Jacobus J C Arts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
| | - Chris S Bailey
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Jennifer C Urquhart
- London Health Sciences Centre Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont
| | - R Andrew Glennie
- Departments of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S
| | | | - Charles G Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | - Lior M Elkaim
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Naif M Alotaibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michael H Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C
| | | | | | - Albert Yee
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nadia Jaber
- University of Toronto Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Erin Cunningham
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Tyler Adams
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Dana El-Mughayyar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Erin Bigney
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
| | - Amanda Vandewint
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, N.B
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Edward Abraham
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Chris Small
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | | | | | - Jeffery Hebert
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
| | - Joel Werier
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kevin Smit
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont
| | - James Villeneuve
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Adam Sachs
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Hesham Abdelbary
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | - Kawan Rakhra
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Philippe Phan
- Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Koucheki
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Aazad Abbas
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Johnathan Lex
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nicholas Nucci
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Cari Whyne
- Holland Musculoskeletal Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jeremie Larouche
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Henry Ahn
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Joel Finkelstein
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jay Toor
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nathan J Lee
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, N.Y
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric J Crawford
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Robert A Ravinsky
- Department of Orthopaedics & Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C
| | - Anthony V Perruccio
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Y Raja Rampersaud
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Mohamed Sarraj
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Fawaz AlShaalan
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alex Koziarz
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | | | - Colby Oitment
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Lalita Bharadwaj
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
| | - Dana El-Mughayyar
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Erin Bigney
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
| | - Neil Manson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Edward Abraham
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
- Saint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, N.B
| | - Chris Small
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
- Saint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, N.B
| | - Najmedden Attabib
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, N.B
| | - Eden Richardson
- Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, N.B
- Horizon Health Network, Saint John, N.B
- Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ont
| | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Hebert
- Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B
| | - Lior M Elkaim
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | - Farbod Niazi
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Rakan Bokhari
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | - Oliver J Lasry
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | | | | | - Varun S Muddaluru
- Graduate Entry Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland
| | - Pranjan Gandhi
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | - Daipayan Guha
- Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Markian A Pahuta
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | - Mamdoh Alhawsawi
- King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | - Feras Qumquji
- King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcelo Oppermann
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Shaurya Gupta
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Joel Ramjist
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Priscila Santos Oppermann
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Victor X D Yang
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | | | - Lior M Elkaim
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Farbod Niazi
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Michael H Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Christian Ioro-Morin
- Service de neurochirurgie, Département de chirurgie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Marco Bonizzato
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Que
- Department of Neuroscience and Centre interdisciplinaire sur le cerveau et l'apprentissage, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que
| | - Alexander G Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, St-Justine University Hospital, Montréal, Que
| | - Marcelo Oppermann
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Joel Ramjist
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Shaurya Gupta
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Priscila S Oppermann
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Victor X D Yang
- Department of Clinical Neurological Science, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
- Department of Electrical Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ont
| | - Youngkyung Jung
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Varun Muddalaru
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland
| | - Pranjan Gandhi
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | - Daipayan Guha
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
| | | | | | - Aazad Abbas
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Johnathan R Lex
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nicholas Nucci
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Cari Whyne
- Sunnybrook Holland Musculoskeletal Research Program, Toronto, Ont
| | - Albert Yee
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Henry Ahn
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Joel Finkelstein
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jeremie Larouche
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jay Toor
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Alaina Dhawan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Jillian Dhawan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Ajay N Sharma
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Calif
| | - Daniel B Azzam
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, Mass
| | - Ahmed Cherry
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | - Nathan J Lee
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, N.Y
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Byers
- Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa
| | | | | | - Justin L Brown
- Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shevaughn Dell
- University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | | | - Kevin Wade
- University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | | | - Carl Bruce
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Jamaica
| | | | - Newton Pimenta
- Surgery Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Bernard LaRue
- Surgery Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Salman Aldakhil
- Surgery Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | | | - Jerome Couture
- Surgery Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | - Julien Goulet
- Surgery Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huang CC, Peng KP, Hsieh HC, Groot OQ, Yen HK, Tsai CC, Karhade AV, Lin YP, Kao YT, Yang JJ, Dai SH, Huang CC, Chen CW, Yen MH, Xiao FR, Lin WH, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Hsu FM, Wong T, Yang RS, Yang SH, Hu MH. Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 482:00003086-990000000-01227. [PMID: 37306629 PMCID: PMC10723864 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) was developed to predict the survival of patients with spinal metastasis. The algorithm was successfully tested in five international institutions using 1101 patients from different continents. The incorporation of 18 prognostic factors strengthens its predictive ability but limits its clinical utility because some prognostic factors might not be clinically available when a clinician wishes to make a prediction. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We performed this study to (1) evaluate the SORG-MLA's performance with data and (2) develop an internet-based application to impute the missing data. METHODS A total of 2768 patients were included in this study. The data of 617 patients who were treated surgically were intentionally erased, and the data of the other 2151 patients who were treated with radiotherapy and medical treatment were used to impute the artificially missing data. Compared with those who were treated nonsurgically, patients undergoing surgery were younger (median 59 years [IQR 51 to 67 years] versus median 62 years [IQR 53 to 71 years]) and had a higher proportion of patients with at least three spinal metastatic levels (77% [474 of 617] versus 72% [1547 of 2151]), more neurologic deficit (normal American Spinal Injury Association [E] 68% [301 of 443] versus 79% [1227 of 1561]), higher BMI (23 kg/m2 [IQR 20 to 25 kg/m2] versus 22 kg/m2 [IQR 20 to 25 kg/m2]), higher platelet count (240 × 103/µL [IQR 173 to 327 × 103/µL] versus 227 × 103/µL [IQR 165 to 302 × 103/µL], higher lymphocyte count (15 × 103/µL [IQR 9 to 21× 103/µL] versus 14 × 103/µL [IQR 8 to 21 × 103/µL]), lower serum creatinine level (0.7 mg/dL [IQR 0.6 to 0.9 mg/dL] versus 0.8 mg/dL [IQR 0.6 to 1.0 mg/dL]), less previous systemic therapy (19% [115 of 617] versus 24% [526 of 2151]), fewer Charlson comorbidities other than cancer (28% [170 of 617] versus 36% [770 of 2151]), and longer median survival. The two patient groups did not differ in other regards. These findings aligned with our institutional philosophy of selecting patients for surgical intervention based on their level of favorable prognostic factors such as BMI or lymphocyte counts and lower levels of unfavorable prognostic factors such as white blood cell counts or serum creatinine level, as well as the degree of spinal instability and severity of neurologic deficits. This approach aims to identify patients with better survival outcomes and prioritize their surgical intervention accordingly. Seven factors (serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase levels, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, and the presence of visceral or brain metastases) were considered possible missing items based on five previous validation studies and clinical experience. Artificially missing data were imputed using the missForest imputation technique, which was previously applied and successfully tested to fit the SORG-MLA in validation studies. Discrimination, calibration, overall performance, and decision curve analysis were applied to evaluate the SORG-MLA's performance. The discrimination ability was measured with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. It ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 0.5 indicating the worst discrimination and 1.0 indicating perfect discrimination. An area under the curve of 0.7 is considered clinically acceptable discrimination. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes and actual outcomes. An ideal calibration model will yield predicted survival rates that are congruent with the observed survival rates. The Brier score measures the squared difference between the actual outcome and predicted probability, which captures calibration and discrimination ability simultaneously. A Brier score of 0 indicates perfect prediction, whereas a Brier score of 1 indicates the poorest prediction. A decision curve analysis was performed for the 6-week, 90-day, and 1-year prediction models to evaluate their net benefit across different threshold probabilities. Using the results from our analysis, we developed an internet-based application that facilitates real-time data imputation for clinical decision-making at the point of care. This tool allows healthcare professionals to efficiently and effectively address missing data, ensuring that patient care remains optimal at all times. RESULTS Generally, the SORG-MLA demonstrated good discriminatory ability, with areas under the curve greater than 0.7 in most cases, and good overall performance, with up to 25% improvement in Brier scores in the presence of one to three missing items. The only exceptions were albumin level and lymphocyte count, because the SORG-MLA's performance was reduced when these two items were missing, indicating that the SORG-MLA might be unreliable without these values. The model tended to underestimate the patient survival rate. As the number of missing items increased, the model's discriminatory ability was progressively impaired, and a marked underestimation of patient survival rates was observed. Specifically, when three items were missing, the number of actual survivors was up to 1.3 times greater than the number of expected survivors, while only 10% discrepancy was observed when only one item was missing. When either two or three items were omitted, the decision curves exhibited substantial overlap, indicating a lack of consistent disparities in performance. This finding suggests that the SORG-MLA consistently generates accurate predictions, regardless of the two or three items that are omitted. We developed an internet application (https://sorg-spine-mets-missing-data-imputation.azurewebsites.net/) that allows the use of SORG-MLA with up to three missing items. CONCLUSION The SORG-MLA generally performed well in the presence of one to three missing items, except for serum albumin level and lymphocyte count (which are essential for adequate predictions, even using our modified version of the SORG-MLA). We recommend that future studies should develop prediction models that allow for their use when there are missing data, or provide a means to impute those missing data, because some data are not available at the time a clinical decision must be made. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results suggested the algorithm could be helpful when a radiologic evaluation owing to a lengthy waiting period cannot be performed in time, especially in situations when an early operation could be beneficial. It could help orthopaedic surgeons to decide whether to intervene palliatively or extensively, even when the surgical indication is clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Ching Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Ping Peng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hung-Kuan Yen
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chen Tsai
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Aditya V. Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yen-Po Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Tien Kao
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiun-Jen Yang
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiang Dai
- Department of International Business, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Ching Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Mao-Hsu Yen
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Ren Xiao
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Feng-Ming Hsu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzehong Wong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Rong-Sen Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hua Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Departmentof Orthopedics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Departmentof Orthopedics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee TY, Chen YA, Groot OQ, Yen HK, Bindels BJJ, Pierik RJ, Hsieh HC, Karhade AV, Tseng TE, Lai YH, Yang JJ, Lee CC, Hu MH, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Yang RS, Lin WH. Comparison of eight modern preoperative scoring systems for survival prediction in patients with extremity metastasis. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37306656 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival is an important factor to consider when clinicians make treatment decisions for patients with skeletal metastasis. Several preoperative scoring systems (PSSs) have been developed to aid in survival prediction. Although we previously validated the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Machine-learning Algorithm (SORG-MLA) in Taiwanese patients of Han Chinese descent, the performance of other existing PSSs remains largely unknown outside their respective development cohorts. We aim to determine which PSS performs best in this unique population and provide a direct comparison between these models. METHODS We retrospectively included 356 patients undergoing surgical treatment for extremity metastasis at a tertiary center in Taiwan to validate and compare eight PSSs. Discrimination (c-index), decision curve (DCA), calibration (ratio of observed:expected survivors), and overall performance (Brier score) analyses were conducted to evaluate these models' performance in our cohort. RESULTS The discriminatory ability of all PSSs declined in our Taiwanese cohort compared with their Western validations. SORG-MLA is the only PSS that still demonstrated excellent discrimination (c-indexes>0.8) in our patients. SORG-MLA also brought the most net benefit across a wide range of risk probabilities on DCA with its 3-month and 12-month survival predictions. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians should consider potential ethnogeographic variations of a PSS's performance when applying it onto their specific patient populations. Further international validation studies are needed to ensure that existing PSSs are generalizable and can be integrated into the shared treatment decision-making process. As cancer treatment keeps advancing, researchers developing a new prediction model or refining an existing one could potentially improve their algorithm's performance by using data gathered from more recent patients that are reflective of the current state of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tse-Ying Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-An Chen
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Hung-Kuan Yen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Bas J J Bindels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan Pierik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Ting-En Tseng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsiang Lai
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Jen Yang
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Che Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Rong-Sen Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huele EH, van der Velden JM, Kasperts N, Eppinga WSC, Grutters JPC, Suelmann BBM, Weening AA, Delawi D, Teunissen SCCM, Verkooijen HM, Verlaan JJ, Gal R. Stereotactic Body radiotherapy and pedicLE screw fixatioN During one hospital visit for patients with symptomatic unstable spinal metastases: a randomized trial (BLEND RCT) using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design. Trials 2023; 24:307. [PMID: 37143158 PMCID: PMC10157966 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07315-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal metastases can lead to unremitting pain and neurological deficits, which substantially impair daily functioning and quality of life. Patients with unstable spinal metastases receive surgical stabilization followed by palliative radiotherapy as soon as wound healing allows. The time between surgery and radiotherapy delays improvement of mobility, radiotherapy-induced pain relief, local tumor control, and restart of systemic oncological therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enables delivery of preoperative high-dose radiotherapy while dose-sparing the surgical field, allowing stabilizing surgery within only hours. Patients may experience earlier recovery of mobility, regression of pain, and return to systemic oncological therapy. The BLEND RCT evaluates the effectiveness of SBRT followed by surgery within 24 h for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases. METHODS This phase III randomized controlled trial is embedded within the PRospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe meTastases (PRESENT) cohort. Patients with symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases requiring stabilizing surgery and radiotherapy will be randomized (1:1). The intervention group (n = 50) will be offered same-day SBRT and surgery, which they can accept or refuse. According to the Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) design, the control group (n = 50) will not be informed and receive standard treatment (surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy after 1-2 weeks when wound healing allows). Baseline characteristics and outcome measures will be captured within PRESENT. The primary outcome is physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL) 4 weeks after start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include pain response, time until return to systemic oncological therapy, quality of life, local tumor control, and adverse events up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION The BLEND RCT evaluates the effect of same-day SBRT and stabilizing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases compared with standard of care. We expect better functional outcomes, faster pain relief, and continuation of systemic oncological therapy. The TwiCs design enables efficient recruitment within an ongoing cohort, as well as prevention of disappointment bias and drop-out as control patients will not be informed about the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05575323. Registered on October 11, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E H Huele
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J M van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W S C Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J P C Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - B B M Suelmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A A Weening
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D Delawi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antoniusziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - S C C M Teunissen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Gal
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lans A, Bales JR, Borkhetaria P, Schwab JH, Verlaan JJ, Rossi LP, Tobert DG. Impact of Health Literacy on Self-Reported Health Outcomes in Spine Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:E87-E93. [PMID: 36191035 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey study. OBJECTIVE The aim was to determine if health literacy level is associated with patient-reported outcomes and self-reported health status among patients presenting to an academic outpatient spine center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patient reports are critical to assessing symptom severity and treatment success in orthopedic spine patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important instruments commonly used for this purpose. However, the influence of patient health literacy on PROMs has not yet been given much consideration in spine literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 years and new to our clinic verbally completed the Newest Vital Sign health literacy assessment tool and a sociodemographic survey, including self-reported health status. In addition, seven Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores were extracted from patient records. Regression modeling was performed with PROMs considered as dependent variables, health literacy level as the primary predictor, and all other factors (age, sex, race, ethnicity, native English speaker, highest educational degree, grade-level reading, marital status, employment status, annual household income, and type of insurance) as covariates. RESULTS Among the 318 included patients, 33% had limited health literacy. Adjusted regression analysis demonstrated that patients with limited health literacy had worse PROM scores across all seven domains (Physical Function: P =0.028; Depression: P =0.035; Global Health-Physical: P =0.001; Global Health-Mental: P =0.007; Pain Interference: P =0.036; Pain Intensity: P =0.002; Anxiety: P =0.047). In addition, patients with limited health literacy reported worse self-reported health status ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Spine patients with limited health literacy have worse baseline PROM scores confounders and report worse general health. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate if limited health literacy is a marker or the root cause of these disparities. Findings from this study urge the consideration of patient health literacy when interpreting PROMs as well as the implications for patient assessment and discussion of treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John R Bales
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pranati Borkhetaria
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht-Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura P Rossi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pielkenrood BJ, Visser TF, van Tol FR, Foppen W, Eppinga WSC, Verhoeff JJC, Bol GH, Van der Velden JM, Verlaan JJ. Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiotherapy. Spine J 2023; 23:571-578. [PMID: 36623735 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Palliative radiotherapy (RT) can lead to remineralization of osteolytic lesions thereby potentially restoring some of the weight-bearing capacity and preventing vertebral collapse. It is not clear, however, under which circumstances remineralization of osteolytic lesions occurs. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the change in bone mineral density in spinal metastases after RT compared to a reference region, and find associated factors. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis within prospective observational cohort OUTCOME MEASURES: change in bone mineral density measured in Hounsfield Units (HU). PATIENT SAMPLE patients treated with RT for (painful) bone metastases. METHODS Patients with spinal metastases were included if computed tomography scans both pre- and post-RT were available. Bone density was measured in HU. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn manually in the metastatic lesion. As a reference, a measurement of bone density in adjacent, unaffected, and non-irradiated vertebrae was used. Factors tested for association were origin of the primary tumor, RT dose and fractionation scheme, and concomitant use of bisphosphonates. RESULTS A total of 31 patients with 49 spinal metastases, originating from various primary tumors, were included. The median age on baseline was 58 years (IQR: 53-63) and median time between baseline and follow-up scan was 8.2 months (IQR: 3.0-18.4). Difference in HU in the lesion before and after treatment was 146.9 HU (95% CI 68.4-225.4; p<.01). Difference in HU in the reference vertebra between baseline and first follow-up was 19.1 HU (95% CI -47.9 to 86.0; p=.58). Difference between reference vertebrae and metastatic lesions on baseline was -194.1 HU (95% CI -276.2 to -112.0; p<.01). After RT, this difference was reduced to -50.3 HU (95% CI -199.6 to 99.0; p=.52). Patients using bisphosphonates showed a greater increase in HU, 194.1 HU versus 60.6 HU, p=.01. CONCLUSIONS Palliative radiation of osteolytic lytic spinal metastases is positively associated with an increased bone mineral density at follow-up. The use of bisphosphonates was linked to an increased bone mineral density when used during or after RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart J Pielkenrood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Thomas F Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris R van Tol
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter Foppen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S C Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs H Bol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steverink JG, van Tol FR, Bruins S, Smorenburg AJ, Tryfonidou MA, Oosterman BJ, van Dijk MR, Malda J, Verlaan JJ. Lack of concentration-dependent local toxicity of highly concentrated (5%) versus conventional 0.5% bupivacaine following musculoskeletal surgery in a rat model. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10:21. [PMID: 36884187 PMCID: PMC9995632 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00591-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Various sustained-release formulations incorporate high bupivacaine concentrations but data on local toxicity is lacking. This study explores local toxic effects of highly concentrated (5%) bupivacaine compared to clinically used concentrations in vivo following skeletal surgery, to assess the safety of sustained-release formulations with high bupivacaine concentrations. METHODS Sixteen rats underwent surgery, in which screws with catheters affixed were implanted in the spine or femur in a factorial experimental design, allowing single-shot or continuous 72 h local administration of 0.5%, 2.5% or 5.0% bupivacaine hydrochloride. During the 30-day follow-up, animal weight was recorded and blood samples were obtained. Implantation sites underwent histopathological scoring for muscle damage, inflammation, necrosis, periosteal reaction/thickening and osteoblast activity. Effects of bupivacaine concentration, administration mode and implantation site on local toxicity scores were analyzed. RESULTS Chi-squared tests for score frequencies revealed a concentration-dependent decrease in osteoblast count. Moreover, spinal screw implantation led to significantly more muscle fibrosis but less bone damage than femoral screw implantation, reflecting the more invasive muscle dissection and shorter drilling times related to the spinal procedure. No differences between bupivacaine administration modes regarding histological scoring or body weight changes were observed. Weight increased, while CK levels and leukocyte counts decreased significantly during follow-up, reflecting postoperative recovery. No significant differences in weight, leukocyte count and CK were found between interventional groups. CONCLUSION This pilot study found limited concentration-dependent local tissue effects of bupivacaine solutions concentrated up to 5.0% following musculoskeletal surgery in the rat study population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper G Steverink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, Netherlands. .,SentryX B.V, Austerlitz, Netherlands.
| | - Floris R van Tol
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, Netherlands.,SentryX B.V, Austerlitz, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marianna A Tryfonidou
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Marijke R van Dijk
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jos Malda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, Netherlands.,SentryX B.V, Austerlitz, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Tol FR, Kamm IMLP, Versteeg AL, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Verkooijen HM, Oner FC, Verlaan JJ. The use of red flags during the referral chain of patients surgically treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. Neurooncol Pract 2023; 10:301-306. [PMID: 37188160 PMCID: PMC10180360 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of so-called ‘red flags’ may be beneficial in identifying patients with metastatic spinal disease. This study examined the utility and efficacy of these red flags in the referral chain of patients surgically treated for spinal metastases.
Methods
The referral chains from the onset of symptoms until surgical treatment for all patients receiving surgery for spinal metastases between March 2009 and December 2020 were reconstructed. The documentation of red flags, as defined by the Dutch National Guideline on Metastatic Spinal Disease, was assessed for each healthcare provider involved.
Results
A total of 389 patients were included in the study. On average, 33.3% of red flags were documented as present, 3.6% were documented as absent and 63.1% were undocumented. A higher rate of red flags documented as present was associated with a longer time to diagnosis, but a shorter time to definitive treatment by a spine surgeon. Moreover, red flags were documented as present more often in patients who developed neurological symptoms at any point during the referral chain than those who remained neurologically intact.
Conclusions
The association of red flags with developing neurological deficits highlights their significance in clinical assessment. However, the presence of red flags was not found to decrease delays prior to referral to a spine surgeon, indicating that their relevance is currently not sufficiently recognized by healthcare providers. Raising awareness of symptoms indicative of spinal metastases may expedite timely (surgical) treatment and thus improve treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F R van Tol
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I M L P Kamm
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Versteeg
- Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto , ON M5S, Canada
| | - K P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F C Oner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lans A, Bales JR, Tobert DG, Rossi LP, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Prevalence of and factors associated with limited health literacy in spine patients. Spine J 2023; 23:440-447. [PMID: 36372351 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited health literacy exacerbates health inequity and has serious implications for patient care. It hinders successful communication and comprehension of relevant health information, which can lead to suboptimal care. Despite the evidence regarding the significance of health literacy, the topic has received little consideration in orthopedic spine patients. PURPOSE To investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with limited health literacy among outpatients presenting to a tertiary urban academic hospital-based orthopedic spine center. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectionals. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients 18 years of age or older seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital-based multi-surgeon outpatient spine center. OUTCOME MEASURES The Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment. METHODS Between December 2021 and March 2022, 447 consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 years and new to the outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation in a cross-sectional survey study, of which 405 agreed to participate. Patients completed the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool, the Rapid Estimation of Adult Literacy in Medicine Short Form (REALM-SF), and a sociodemographic survey (including race/ethnicity, level of education, employment status, income, and marital status). The NVS scores were divided into limited (0-3) and adequate (4-6) health literacy. REALM-SF scores were classified into reading levels below ninth grade (0-6) or at least ninth grade (7). Additional demographic data was extracted from patient records. Online mapping tools were used to collect the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each patient. Subsequently, multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify independent factors associated with limited health literacy. RESULTS The prevalence of limited health literacy in patients presenting to an urban academic outpatient spine center was 33% (135/405). Unadjusted analysis found that patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged (eg, unemployed, lower household income, publicly insured and higher SVI) and had more unfavorable social determinant of health features (eg, housing concerns, higher ADI, less years of education, below ninth grade reading level, unmarried) had high rates of limited health literacy. Adjusted regression analysis demonstrated that limited health literacy was independently associated with higher ADI state decile, living less than 10 years at current address, having housing concerns, not being employed, non-native English speaking, having less years of education and below ninth grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS This study found that a substantial portion of the patients presenting to an outpatient spine center have limited health literacy, more so if they are socially disadvantaged. Future efforts should investigate the impact of limited health literacy on access to care, treatment outcomes and health care utilization in orthopedic patients. Neighborhood social vulnerability measures may be a feasible way to identify patients at risk of limited health literacy in clinical practice and offer opportunities for tailored patient care. This may contribute to prioritizing the mitigation of disparities and aid in the development of meaningful interventions to improve health equity in orthopedics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
| | - John R Bales
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Laura P Rossi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lans A, Kanbier LN, Bernstein DN, Groot OQ, Ogink PT, Tobert DG, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Social determinants of health in prognostic machine learning models for orthopaedic outcomes: A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2023; 29:292-299. [PMID: 36099267 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONAL Social determinants of health (SDOH) are being considered more frequently when providing orthopaedic care due to their impact on treatment outcomes. Simultaneously, prognostic machine learning (ML) models that facilitate clinical decision making have become popular tools in the field of orthopaedic surgery. When ML-driven tools are developed, it is important that the perpetuation of potential disparities is minimized. One approach is to consider SDOH during model development. To date, it remains unclear whether and how existing prognostic ML models for orthopaedic outcomes consider SDOH variables. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether prognostic ML models for orthopaedic surgery outcomes account for SDOH, and to what extent SDOH variables are included in the final models. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies published up to 17 November 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted SDOH features using the PROGRESS+ framework (place of residence, race/ethnicity, Occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, social capital, socioeconomic status, 'Plus+' age, disability, and sexual orientation). RESULTS The search yielded 7138 studies, of which 59 met the inclusion criteria. Across all studies, 96% (57/59) considered at least one PROGRESS+ factor during development. The most common factors were age (95%; 56/59) and gender/sex (96%; 57/59). Differential effect analyses, such as subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment, and baseline comparison, were rarely reported (10%; 6/59). The majority of models included age (92%; 54/59) and gender/sex (69%; 41/59) as final input variables. However, factors such as insurance status (7%; 4/59), marital status (7%; 4/59) and income (3%; 2/59) were seldom included. CONCLUSION The current level of reporting and consideration of SDOH during the development of prognostic ML models for orthopaedic outcomes is limited. Healthcare providers should be critical of the models they consider using and knowledgeable regarding the quality of model development, such as adherence to recognized methodological standards. Future efforts should aim to avoid bias and disparities when developing ML-driven applications for orthopaedics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura N Kanbier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David N Bernstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul T Ogink
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lans A, Bales JR, Fourman MS, Borkhetaria PP, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Health Literacy in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. HSS J 2023; 19:120-127. [PMID: 36776507 PMCID: PMC9837407 DOI: 10.1177/15563316221110536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: Limited health literacy has been associated with adverse health outcomes. Undergoing orthopedic surgery often requires patients to make complex decisions and adhere to complicated instructions, suggesting that health literacy skills might have a profound impact on orthopedic surgery outcomes. Purpose: We sought to review the literature for studies investigating the level of health literacy in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and also to assess how those studies report factors affecting health equity. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for all health literacy studies published in the orthopedic surgery literature up to February 8, 2022. Search terms included synonyms for health literacy and for all orthopedic surgery subspecialties. Two reviewers independently extracted study data in addition to indicators of equity reporting using the PROGRESS+ checklist (Place of Residence, Race/Ethnicity, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Social capital, Socioeconomic status, plus age, disability, and sexual orientation). Results: The search resulted in 616 studies; 9 studies remained after exclusion criteria were applied. Most studies were of arthroplasty (4/9; 44%) or trauma (3/9; 33%) patients. Validated health literacy assessments were used in 4 of the included studies, and only 3 studies reported the rate of limited health literacy in the patients studied, which ranged between 34% and 38.5%. At least one PROGRESS+ item was reported in 88% (8/9) of the studies. Conclusions: We found a paucity of appropriately designed studies that used validated measures of health literacy in the field of orthopedic surgery. The potential impact of health literacy on orthopedic patients and their outcomes has yet to be elucidated. Thoughtful, high-quality trials across diverse demographics and geographies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John R. Bales
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mitchell S. Fourman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pranati P. Borkhetaria
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Verlaan JJ, Fisher CG, Wessels H, Verkooijen HM, Versteeg AL. Patient Expectations About Palliative Treatment for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Qualitative Study. Value Health 2023; 26:4-9. [PMID: 35672228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with spinal metastases often receive palliative surgery or radiation therapy to maintain or improve health-related quality of life. Patients with unrealistic expectations regarding treatment outcomes have been shown to be less satisfied with their post-treatment health status. This study evaluated expectations of patients with spinal metastases scheduled for surgery and/or radiation therapy. METHODS Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with patients with symptomatic spinal metastases before and 6 weeks after surgery and/or radiation therapy. Expectations regarding treatment outcomes were discussed before treatment, and level of fulfillment of these pretreatment expectations was discussed after treatment. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed according to the thematic analysis method to identify themes. RESULTS Before treatment, patients thought they were not, or minimally, informed about (expected) treatment outcomes, but they felt well informed about treatment procedures and possible complications. Although patients expected pain relief and improvement in daily functioning, they found it difficult to describe any recovery timeline or the impact of these expected improvements on their daily life. Patients generally understood that treatment was not curative, but lacked insight into the impact of treatment on life expectancy given that this was hardly discussed by their surgeon and/or radiation oncologist. Pretreatment expectations regarding pain and daily functioning were only partially met in most patients post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Patients thought they were not, or only minimally, informed about expected outcomes after surgery and/or radiation therapy for symptomatic spinal metastases. Improvements in patient-physician communication and counseling could help guide patients toward realistic pretreatment expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Raphäele Charest-Morin
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hester Wessels
- Department of Corporate Communications, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne L Versteeg
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lans A, Bales JR, Fourman MS, Tobert DG, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Reliability of self-reported health literacy screening in spine patients. Spine J 2022; 23:715-722. [PMID: 36565954 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Limited health literacy has previously been associated with increased health care utilization, worse general health status and self-reported health, and increased mortality. Identifying and accommodating patients with limited health literacy may offer an avenue towards mitigating adverse health outcomes and reduce unnecessary health care expenditure. Due to the challenges associated with implementation of lengthy health literacy assessments, the Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument was developed. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on the accuracy of this screening questionnaire, with or without the inclusion of sociodemographic characteristics, when predicting limited health literacy in orthopaedic spine patients. PURPOSE To evaluate the reliability and predictive accuracy of self-reported health literacy screening questions with and without the inclusion of sociodemographic variables in orthopaedic spine patients. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital-based multi-surgeon spine center OUTCOME MEASURES: Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument (BRIEF), and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool. METHODS Between December 2021 and February 2022, consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 presenting as new patients to an urban, hospital-based outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation. A sociodemographic survey, the BRIEF, and the NVS Health Literacy Assessment Tool were administered verbally. Simple and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the accuracy of each BRIEF question individually, and collectively, at predicting limited health literacy as defined by the NVS. Further regression analysis included sociodemographic variables (age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, highest educational degree, employment status, marital status, annual household income, insurance status, and self-reported health. RESULTS A total of 262 patients [mean age (years), 57 ± 17] were included in this study. One hundred thirty-four (51%) were male, 223 (85%) were White, and 151 (58%) were married. Patient BRIEF scores were as follows: 23 (9%) limited, 43 (16%) marginal, and 196 (75%) adequate. NVS scores identified 87 (33%) patients with possible limited health literacy. BRIEF items collectively demonstrated fair accuracy in the prediction of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82). Individually, the fourth BRIEF item ("How confident are you in filling out medical forms by yourself?") was the best predictor of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.73). The predictive accuracy of the BRIEF items, both individually and collectively, increased with the inclusion of sociodemographic variables within the logistic regression. Specific characteristics independently associated with limited health literacy were self-identified Black race, retired or disabled employment status, single or divorced marital status, high school education or below, and self-reported "poor" health. CONCLUSIONS Limited health literacy has implications for patient outcomes and health care costs. Our results show that the BRIEF questionnaire is a low-cost screening tool that demonstrates fair predictability in determining limited health literacy within a population of spine patients. Self-reported health literacy assessments may be more feasible in daily practice and easier to implement into clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
| | - John R Bales
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Mitchell S Fourman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Montefiore Medical School - Albert Einstein School of Medicine, 1250 Waters Pl, Tower 1, 11(th) Floor, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sidhu K, Kim D, Lebel D, Alshammari A, Photopoulos G, Duarte MP, Provost M, Nielsen C, Oitment C, Cowley R, Dumas E, Dea N, Versteeg A, Eltit F, Rampersaud YR, Dandurand C, Grassner L, Alduwaisan A, Kennedy C, Christie S, Toobaie A, Algarni N, El-Mughayyar D, Pahuta M, Grassner L, Pelletier-Roy R, Bak AB, Singh S, Abbas A, Abbas A, Abbas A, Ajisebutu A, Aldahamsheh O, Martin S, Baron N, Basiratzadeh S, Beresford-Cleary N, Good C, Thomson A, Bhatt F, Bhatt F, Good C, Thomson A, Blake N, Briand MM, Shah V, Chen T, Cherry A, Rocos B, Cherry A, Chua R, Chua R, Cotter T, Coyle MJ, Dandurand C, Dandurand C, Dandurand C, Dauphinee E, Dionne A, El Bojairami I, Duarte MP, Duarte MP, Elahi MT, Ellingwood N, Ells B, Fallah N, Fernandes R, Fernandes R, Fleury C, Flórez-Jiménez S, Li P, Gennari A, Georgiopoulos M, Greene R, Yu C, Werthmann N, Hakimjavadi R, Hakimjavadi R, Heard B, Hutchison C, Kemna C, Kennedy C, Laflamme M, Laskin J, MacLean M, Mac-Thiong JM, Manson N, Manson N, Manson N, Urquhart J, Kuepper E, Pahuta M, Pahuta M, Parker E, Persad A, Phan K, Rachevitz M, Ridha B, Dhaliwal P, Sakoto S, Sarraj M, Sarraj M, Hache P, Singh S, Slosar P, Sun M, Sundararajan K, Sundararajan K, Thornley P, Thornley P, Thornley P, Thornley P, Thorogood N, Toobaie A, Belhouari S, Olotu O, Du JT, Saleh I, Varga A, Varshney V, Versteeg A, Visnjevac O, Wang Z, Wasim A, Wasim A, Wu J, Filezio M, Singh V, Ferri-de-Barros F, Dermott J, Lebel D, Machida M, Bath N, Levin D, Campbell F, Koyle M, Isaac L, Ruskin D, Brennenstuh S, Stinson J, Navarro-Ramirez R, Rabau O, Ouellet JA, Hurry J, Brooks J, Fitzgerald R, Louer C, Murphy J, Shaw KA, Smit K, El-Hawary R, Joncas J, Parent S, Duval M, Chèmaly O, Brassard F, Mac-Thiong JM, Barchi S, Labelle H, Beauséjour M, Ishimo MC, Joncas J, Labelle H, Le May S, Lewis L, Arnold K, Oitment C, Jentzsch T, Lewis S, Rienmuller A, Jentzsch T, Yashuv HS, Martin A, Nielsen C, Berven S, Ludwig T, Coyle M, Asmussen M, Edwards B, Nicholls F, Bigney E, Fleury C, El-Mughayyar D, Cherry A, Vanderwint A, Richardson E, Kerr J, McPhee R, Abraham E, Manson N, Attabib N, Small C, Couture J, Goulet J, Bédard S, Lebel K, LaRue B, Investigators CSORN, Gal R, Verlaan JJ, Charest-Morin R, Fisher CG, Wessels H, Verkooijen L, Ng T, Gokaslan Z, Fisher C, Dea N, Charest-Morin R, Urquhart J, Glennie A, Fisher C, Bailey C, Mcintosh G, Fisher C, Paquet J, Abraham E, Bailey C, Weber M, Johnson M, Nataraj A, Glennie A, Attabib N, Kelly A, Hall H, Rampersaud R, Manson N, Phan P, Thomas K, Dea N, Thomé C, Kögl N, Vo AK, Kramer JLK, Petr O, Visva S, Phan K, Nguyen-Luu T, Stratton A, Kingwell S, Wai E, Phan P, Puskas D, Pahuta M, Marion T, Greene R, Kehler S, Rockwood K, Urquhart J, Thornley P, Rasoulinejad P, Glennie A, Rampersaud R, Manson N, Abraham E, Fisher C, Charest-Morin R, Paquette S, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Thomas K, Dea N, Dvorak M, Kwon B, Street J, Ailon T, Christie S, Bailey C, McIntosh G, Dea N, Charest-Morin R, Adams T, Bigney E, Cunningham E, Richardson E, Vandewint A, Attabib N, Abraham E, Manson N, Small C, LeRoux A, Kolyvas G, Investigators CSORN, Hebert J, Jiang E, Fisk F, Taliaferro K, Stukas S, Cooper J, Gill J, Fallah N, Skinnider MA, Belanger L, Ritchie L, Tsang A, Dong K, Streijger F, Street J, Paquette S, Ailon T, Dea N, Charest-Morin R, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, Wellington C, Kwon BK, Dionne A, Richard-Denis A, Briand MM, Bourassa-Moreau É, Mac-Thiong JM, Moghaddamjou A, Fehlings MG, Nadeau M, Fisher C, Toor J, Larouche J, Finkelstein J, Whyne C, Yee A, Toor J, Du JT, Versteeg A, Yee N, Finkelstein J, Abouali J, Nousiainen MT, Kreder H, Whyne C, Larouche J, Toor J, Lewis S, Finkelstein J, Larouche J, Yee A, Whyne C, Dhaliwal P, Hasan M, Berrington N, Johnson M, Burger L, Nicholls F, Evaniew N, Cobetto N, Aubin CE, Larson AN, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Hakimjavadi R, Michalowski W, Viktor H, Baddour N, Wai E, Stratton A, Kingwell S, Phan P, Dandurand C, Mawhinney G, Reynolds J, Orosz L, Thomson A, Bhatt F, Guth M, Allen B, Boyd D, Grigorian J, Schuler T, Jazini E, Haines C, Orosz L, Bhatt F, Allen B, Sabet A, Schuler T, Haines C, Jazini E, Orosz L, Thomson A, Namian S, Bharara N, Jazini E, Good C, Schuler T, Haines C, Orosz L, Tewari A, Roy R, Good C, Schuler T, Haines C, Jazini E, Orosz L, Thomson A, Bhatt F, Grigorian J, Schuler T, Haines C, Merril J, Roy R, Jazini E, Wang M, Orosz L, Haines C, Jazini E, Bhatt F, Sabet A, Roy R, Schuler T, Good C, Greene R, Schmidt M, Christie S, Richard-Denis A, Le MT, Lim V, Mac-Thiong JM, Gallagher M, Cheung A, Brown J, Chaudhry H, Yee C, McIntosh G, Christie S, Fisher C, Jarzem P, Roy JF, Bouchard J, Yee A, Eseonu K, Ahn H, Cherry A, Rampersaud R, Davidson B, Rabinovitch L, Nielsen C, Jiang F, Vaisman A, Lewis S, Canizares M, Rampersaud R, Investigators CSORN, Avila M, Burket A, Aguilar-Salinas P, Mongrain R, Ouellet J, Driscoll M, Schmidt-Braekling T, Dobransky J, Kreviazuk C, Gofton W, Phan P, Beaule P, Grammatopoulos G, Street J, Fisher C, Jacobs B, Johnson M, Paquet J, Wilson J, Hall H, Bailey CS, Christie S, Nataraj A, Manson N, Phan P, Rampersaud R, Thomas K, Mcintosh G, Rasoulinejad P, Charest-Morin R, Hindi M, Farimani PL, Mashayekhi MS, Ailon T, Boyd M, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon B, Paquette S, Street J, Urquhart J, Ailon T, Bailey C, Boyd M, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Glennie A, Kwon B, Paquette S, Rampersaud R, Street J, Fisher C, Vandewint A, Bigney E, El-Mughayyar D, Richardson E, Edward A, Manson N, Attabib N, Kolyvas G, Small C, Investigators CSORN, Mac-Thiong JM, Barthélémy D, Lim V, Richard-Denis A, Driscoll M, Aubin CE, Cobetto N, Roy-Beaudry M, Bellefleur C, Turgeon I, Labelle H, Barchi S, Parent S, Joncas J, Parent S, Labelle H, Barchi S, Mac-Thiong JM, Lee W, Phan P, Bigney E, Richardson E, El-Mughayyar D, Vandewint A, Abraham E, Manson N, Small C, Alugo T, Leroux A, Kolyvas G, Investigators CSORN, Attabib N, McIntosh G, Oxner W, Dunning PC, Glennie A, Wang D, Humphreys S, Noonan V, Urquhart J, Siddiqi F, Rasoulinejad P, Bailey C, Urquhart J, Thornley P, Rampersaud R, Glennie A, Rasoulinejad P, Fisher C, Bailey C, Investigators CSORN, Bigney E, Dumas E, El-Mughayyar D, Cherry A, Vanderwint A, Richardson E, Kerr J, McPhee R, Abraham E, Manson N, Attabib N, Small C, Couture J, Goulet J, Bédard S, LaRue B, Investigators CSORN, Macthiong JM, Bourassa-Moreau E, Ogden C, Gallagher M, Cheung A, Huong VT, Tarabay B, Al-Shakfa F, Yuh SJ, Shedid D, Boubez G, Wang Z, Gueziri HE, Santaguida C, Collins DL, Hall A, Alant J, Barry S, Weise L, Glennie A, Oxner B, Etchegary H, Christie S, Carreon L, Glassman S, Brown M, Daniels C, Polly D, Gum J, Gum J, Glassman S, Brown M, Daniels C, Carreon L, Hong HA, Fallah N, Humphreys S, Walden K, Noonan VK, Phan P, Basiratzadeh S, Wai EK, Phan P, Salo P, Krawetz R, Hart D, Bains I, Swamy G, Yang Q, Godoy A, Smith S, Lin C, Nataraj A, Puskas D, Pahuta M, Marion T, Dea N, Waheed Z, Thorogood N, Nightingale T, Noonan V, Touchette C, Duda T, Almojuela A, Bergeron D, Aljoghaiman M, Sader N, Kameda-Smith M, Alant J, Christie S, Hresko MT, Alzakri A, Parent S, Sucato DJ, Lenke LG, Marks M, Labelle H, Pereira P, Charles YP, Krutko A, Santos C, Park Y, Arzoglou V, Park SW, Franke J, Fuentes S, He S, Hosszu T, Varanda P, Mlyavykh S, Vanhauwaert D, Senker W, Franke J, Park Y, Charles YP, Santos C, Arzoglou V, Song Y, He S, Bhagat S, Hong JY, Vanhauwaert D, Senker W, Pereira P, Senker W, Charles YP, Pereira P, Santos C, Park Y, Arzoglou V, Park SW, Bordon G, Fuentes S, Song Y, Vialle E, Bhagat S, Krutko A, Franke J, Thornley P, Rampersaud R, Glennie A, Rasoulinejad P, Abraham E, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Kwon B, Manson N, Paquette S, Street J, Thomas K, Fisher C, Bailey C, Mishreky A, Hurry J, El-Hawary R, Jiang E, Fisk F, Taliaferro K, Dea N, Investigators CSORN, Al Anazi M, El-Hawary R, Kindrachuk M, Noyes E, Wu A, Fourney D, Pratt M, Wai E, Stratton A, Kingwell S, Wang Z, Phan P, Robarts S, Razmjou H, Yee A, Larouche J, Finkelstein J, Persad A, Huschi Z, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Rossong H, Zhang H, Johnson M, Goytan M, Zarrabian M, Berrington N, Zeiler F, Charles A, Roy-Beaudy, Parent S, Duong L, Marion T, Guha D, Pahuta M, Hache P, Oitment C, Guha D, Pahuta M, Sarraj M, Oitment C, Guha D, Pahuta M, Miyanji F, McAnany S, Cheung A, Dewitt D, Street J, Jurisica I, Perruccio AV, Rampersaud YR, Niu Y, Perruccio AV, Jurisica I, Rampersaud YR, Glennie A, Alahmari A, Al-Jahdali F, Fisher C, Rampersaud R, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Urquhart J, Rampersaud R, Glennie A, Fisher C, Bailey C, Urquhart J, Rampersaud R, Glennie A, Fisher C, Bailey C, Harback K, Akpinar I, Adjetey C, Tindall D, Chernesky J, Noonan V, Fernandes RJR, Bailey C, Siddiqi F, Rasoulinejad P, Toor J, Abbas A, Brooks H, Larouche J, Abbas A, Bhatia A, Selimovic D, Larouche J, Yee A, Lewis S, Finkelstein J, Toor J, Abbas A, Toor J, Versteeg A, Finkelstein J, Toor J, Abbas A, Ahn H, Larouche J, Finkelstein J, Whyne C, Yee A, Slomp F, Thiessen E, Lastivnyak N, Maclean LS, Ritchie V, Hockley A, Osborn J, Paquette S, Sahjpaul R, Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Verlaan JJ, Wessels H, Fisher CG, Verkooijen L, Pastrak M, Truong VT, Liberman M, Al-Shakfa F, Yuh SJ, Soder SA, Wu J, Sunna T, Renaud-Charest É, Boubez G, Shedid D, Balasuberamaniam P, Shrikumar M, Chen T, Anthony T, Phillips A, Nathens A, Chapman M, Crawford E, Stark R, Schwartz C, Finkelstein J, Small C, Rampersaud R. Canadian Spine SocietyAbstract 57. Radiographic reporting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is there a discrepancy comparing radiologists’ reports and surgeons’ assessments?Abstract 74. How useful is prereferral spine imaging? A quality improvement projectAbstract 82. Early recovery after surgery, predictors of shorter length of stayAbstract 68. Gliding screws on early-onset scoliosis: a 5-year experienceAbstract 66. Reliability of radiographic assessment of growth modulation from anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in pediatric scoliosisAbstract 16. A dangerous curve: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosisAbstract 24. Development of a model of interprofessional support interventions to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosisAbstract 94. Recognizing the importance of self-image in adult spinal deformity: results from the Prospective Evaluation of Elderly Deformity Surgery (PEEDS)Abstract 25. Assessing pain as a primary factor in the surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity surgery in patients over 60 years of ageAbstract 72. Application of the Ames-International Spine Study Group (AMES) radiographic modifiers to an asymptomatic population. Are the thresholds for “normal” appropriate?Abstract 109. Exploring the relationship between cannabis and narcotic use on preoperative health considerations in Canadian thoracolumbar patients: a CSORN studyAbstract 36. Metastatic spine disease: Should patients with short life expectancy be denied surgical care? An international retrospective cohort studyAbstract 91. What do patients expect of palliative treatment for symptomatic spinal metastases? A qualitative studyAbstract 44. Denosumab for giant cell tumours of the spine: molecular predictors of clinical response — a pilot studyAbstract 89. Surgical management and outcomes from “stable” degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) from the CSORN prospective DS study: What the @#$ % are we doing?Abstract 33. Economic consequences of waiting for lumbar disc herniation surgeryAbstract 108. Motor recovery depends on timing of surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniationAbstract 106. Outcomes following revision decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis when compared to primary decompression: a matched cohort analysis using the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registryAbstract 64. Patient engagement, remote monitoring and virtual care — a pilot project in rural and remote patients undergoing elective lumbar surgeryAbstract 84. Development of a frailty index from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) to predict long-term success of surgery for patients with degenerative pathologies of the spineAbstract 102. Posterolateral versus posterior interbody fusion for the management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis from the CSORN prospective LDS propensity score matched studyAbstract 31. Impact on patient-reported outcomes of ending the posterior construct proximally at C2 versus C3 in degenerative cervical myelopathy patientsAbstract 42. Perioperative factors predict 2-year trajectories of pain and disability following anterior cervical discectomy and fusionAbstract 61. Calculating utilities from the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score: a prerequisite for quantifying the value of care for cervical myelopathyAbstract 119. Serum neurofilament light (NF-L) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) biomarkers and their association with MRI findings in human acute traumatic spinal cord injuryAbstract 95. The Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (MAC-SCI): a new tool to detect and characterize spinal cord injury in the trauma patientAbstract 118. Mechanism of injury is associated with neurologic outcomes after cervical sensorimotor complete acute traumatic spinal cord injuryAbstract 13. Patient perspective: diagnosis and prognosis of acute spinal cord injuriesAbstract 136. Predictive analytics to improve dedicated spine trauma operating room resource allocationAbstract 138. Machine learning models to predict surgical resident workload at a level 1 trauma centreAbstract 139. Machine learning to predict duration of surgery and length of stay for single-level discectomy proceduresAbstract 9. Outpatient spinal surgery in ManitobaAbstract 131. Unexpected positive culture in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisAbstract 50. Lumbar anterior vertebral body tethering: biomechanical assessment of the surgical decision factors influencing the immediate and 2 years postoperative correctionAbstract 145. Does prolonged symptom duration influence surgical outcomes for cervical radiculopathy?Abstract 147. A data-driven cluster analysis approach to create homogenous subgroups for traumatic spine injury: toward improving traditional classificationAbstract 41. The use of neo-adjuvant denosumab in treatment of giant cell tumours of the spineAbstract 5. Complications, revision rates and accuracy of robotic-guided S2 alar-iliac screw placementAbstract 6. Opioid use after spine surgery: How much are we over-prescribing?Abstract 7. Intradiscal injection of autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate improves low back pain at 1 yearAbstract 8. Augmented reality–assisted spine surgery: an early experience demonstrating safety and accuracy with 218 screwsAbstract 22. Comparison of complications, revision rates and fluoroscopy time using the latest technology in robotic-guided surgery with historical fluoroscopic-guided controlsAbstract 23. Robotic-guided thoracolumbar fusion experience: a multi-surgeon, single-centre study of 628 patients and 3874 robotic-guided screws from 2012 to 2020Abstract 86. A province-wide assessment of the appropriateness of lumbar spine MRIAbstract 134. Concomitant traumatic spinal cord injury and brain injury diagnoses are more frequent and impactful than expectedAbstract 45. Spatial and depth mapping of nascent mineralization on Ti6Al4V surfaces demonstrating hierarchical macro-micro-nanoscale surface featuresAbstract 111. Propensity-matched outcomes comparing lumbar interbody fusion and total disk arthroplasty: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyAbstract 30. A Canadian-based pilot study of current surgical practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgeryAbstract 32. Local contamination is a major cause of early deep wound infections following open posterior lumbosacral fusionsAbstract 99. Comparing patient preoperative expectations and postoperative expectation fulfillment between minimally invasive versus open fusion surgeryAbstract 146. Outpatient robotic-assisted lumbar spinal fusion using the Mazor X Stealth EditionAbstract 149. Lessons learned from my first 100 robotic-assisted lumbar fusions using the Mazor X Stealth Edition: surgical synergy with MIS, surgical navigation and roboticsAbstract 151. Freehand biomechanical testing for use in lumbar discectomy trainingAbstract 48. Spinal pathology and outcome post-THA: Does segment of arthrodesis matter?Abstract 27. Patient, surgical and institutional factors associated with length of stay in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: national multicentre cohort analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN)Abstract 28. The impact of the increasing proportion of degenerative spine emergency admissionsAbstract 51. Patient’s expectations of surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis by site and type of surgery from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN)Abstract 60. The impact of sex on thoracolumbar surgery outcomes in patients with diabetes — a CSORN studyAbstract 81. The impact of older age on rehabilitation outcomes following functional motor-incomplete traumatic spinal cord injuryAbstract 47. Devise and investigate a novel, intramuscular pressure based, muscle activation strategy in a spine stability modelAbstract 17. 3D radiologic outcomes for patients with moderate idiopathic scoliosis curves treated with internal (anterior vertebral growth modulation) versus external bracing: a 2-year observational studyAbstract 18. Is quality of life affected by concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis when undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and nonsurgical management of the spondylolisthesis?Abstract 128. Toward macrostructural and microstructural investigation of the cervical spinal cord through quantitative analysis of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imagingAbstract 26. Minimally invasive versus open thoracolumbar spine surgery for patients who have lumbar spinal stenosis and an ASA score of 3 or above: a CSORN studyAbstract 101. Association between surgeon age and outcomes of spine surgery: a population-based retrospective cohort studyAbstract 77. Utilizing machine learning methodology to create a short form of the Multi-Morbidity Index in spinal cord injuryAbstract 70. Ten-year reoperation rate and clinical outcome in patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosisAbstract 105. Assessing the importance of radiographic and clinical parameters when choosing decompression without fusion for LDS: results from the CSORN prospective DS studyAbstract 104. Preoperative cannabis use in Canadian thoracolumbar spine surgery patients: a CSORN studyAbstract 142. Post-traumatic ascending myelitis, about 2 cases, etiologic analysis and treatmentAbstract 55. NanoLOCK surfaces enhance osteoblast activities at the cellular levelAbstract 76. Which scoring system is the most accurate for predicting survival in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases from lung cancer?Abstract 11. Pedicle screw insertion using ultrasound-based navigation without intraoperative radiation: feasibility study on porcine cadaversAbstract 85. What barriers prevent patients being discharged from hospital following elective spine surgery?Abstract 15. Propensity-matched comparison of 90-day complications in robotic-assisted versus non-robotic-assisted lumbar fusionAbstract 56. No-tap (2-step) robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (RA-CBT) screw insertion is safe and efficient: comparative analysis of 179 patients and 924 RA-CBT screwsAbstract 124. Developing a Web-based application to promote the adoption of a clinical prediction model for independent walking in people with traumatic spinal cord injury — a protocolAbstract 125. Multivariable prediction models for prognostication after traumatic spinal cord injury — a systematic reviewAbstract 148. Expression of blood serum cytokines in the presentation of acute sciaticaAbstract 150. Do patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) correlate with bundled payment plan performance for elective spine surgeries?Abstract 46. Effects of delayed neurosurgery on anxiety, depression and economic burdenAbstract 69. Care close to home — a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery in a rural satellite hospitalAbstract 110. Surgical adverse events for primary tumours of the spine and their impact on prognosis and outcomes: a PTRON studyAbstract 80. Spinal cord stimulation research in the restoration of function for individuals living with spinal cord injuries: a scoping reviewAbstract 132. Workup and management of asymptomatic extracranial traumatic vertebral artery injury: a Canadian Neurosurgery Resident Research Collaborative studyAbstract 12. A surgical treatment algorithm for restoring pelvic balance and health-related quality of life in high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesisAbstract 38. Effectiveness of 6 surgical approaches for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: 1-year follow-up results from a global multicentre studyAbstract 39. Clinical outcomes and fusion success in patients with degenerative lumbar disease without spondylolisthesis: comparing anterolateral to posterior MIS approaches from a global multicentre studyAbstract 40. Anterolateral versus posterior approaches to minimally invasive interbody fusion for patients with spondylolisthesis: results at 1-year follow-up from a global multicentre studyAbstract 73. Benefit of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional interbody fusion versus posterolateral spinal fusion in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a propensity-matched analysis from the CSORN prospective LDS studyAbstract 67. The effect of fusionless pediatric scoliosis surgery on 3D radiographic spinopelvic alignmentAbstract 62. Calculating utilities from the Neck Disability Index: a prerequisite for quantifying the value of cervical spine careAbstract 63. The psychometric properties of the mJOA for quality-of-life assessments in cervical myelopathyAbstract 59. Low radius of curvature growth friendly implants increases the risk of developing clinically significant proximal junctional kyphosisAbstract 144. Very long–term outcome of single-level minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy with a tubular retractorAbstract 112. Metal implant hypersensitivity in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a literature review and case reportAbstract 43. Diagnostic value of the lumbar spinal stenosis (SSHQ) survey in virtual care provided at a tertiary spine programAbstract 54. Is the Calgary Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery (CAPPS) score correlated with long-term outcomes after lumbar fusion?Abstract 4. Development of a single-entry referral pathway for patients with spinal conditions in Manitoba: a cross-sectional review of impact and potential way forward for Canadian spine programsAbstract 113. Automatization of bone age calculationAbstract 123. An effectiveness and quality-of-life analysis of conservative care versus surgery for moderate and severe cervical myelopathyAbstract 133. Long-term survivorship of cervical spine procedures: a survivorship meta-analysis and meta-regressionAbstract 137. Natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a meta-analysis and neurologic deterioration survival curve synthesisAbstract 14. Does intraoperative vancomycin powder affect postoperative infections in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Abstract 37. The clinical impact of nano-surface technology on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusionAbstract 130. Design and implementation of a comprehensive perioperative complex spine communication toolAbstract 87. Stratifying low back pain patients in an inter-professional education and self-management model of care: results of a latent class analysisAbstract 88. Cohort accuracy versus confidence at the patient level: clinical challenges for AI-based prediction of low back pain outcomesAbstract 96. Preoperative disc angle is an important predictor of segmental lordosis after degenerative spondylolisthesis fusionAbstract 97. Preoperative depression, functional and radiographic outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisAbstract 116. A CSORN study of functional outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesisAbstract 121. A CSORN study of the effect on radiographic alignment outcomes with different surgery type for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisAbstract 79. Spinal cord stimulation to restore neurological function: a costing analysisAbstract 107. Biomechanical properties of a novel morselized bone graft cageAbstract 93. Optimizing spine surgery instrument trays to immediately increase efficiency and reduce costs in the operating roomAbstract 103. Machine learning models can predict subsequent publication of North American Spine Society Annual General Meeting abstractsAbstract 117. The use of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for lower back pain due to sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysisAbstract 141. How to make the most of your operative time by optimizing surgical schedulingAbstract 126. Altering physician referral practices remains a challenge: a spine assessment clinic quality improvement studyAbstract 152. Outcomes of workers’ compensation patients undergoing neuromodulation for persistent neuropathic pain conditionsAbstract 90. Expectations of treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases: What do we tell our patients? A qualitative studyAbstract 52. Fluoroscopically guided radiofrequency ablation of the superior cluneal nerve: preliminary outcomes data for a minimally invasive approach for treating superior cluneal neuralgiaAbstract 21. Single-stage posterior approach for en bloc resection and spinal reconstruction of T4 Pancoast tumour invading spineAbstract 34. Predictors of sacral ulcers in patients with complete spinal cord injuryAbstract 135. Targeting geographic wait time disparities in Canada: a rapid review of domestic and international strategies to reduce orthopedic wait times in the MaritimesAbstract 143. The influence of coronal plane parameters on patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Can J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
27
|
Gal R, van der Velden JM, Bach DC, Verlaan JJ, Geuze RE, Rutges JPHJ, Verkooijen HM, Versteeg AL. Translation and validation of the Dutch Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1009. [PMID: 36424582 PMCID: PMC9686456 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05837-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The primary goal of palliative treatment of spinal metastases is to maintain or improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We translated and validated a Dutch version of The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0), a valid and reliable 20-item questionnaire to evaluate HRQOL in patients with spinal metastases. Methods After cross-cultural translation and adaptation, the questionnaire was pre-tested in fifteen patients referred for spine surgery and/or radiotherapy. This resulted in a final questionnaire that was sent to patients for assessment of internal consistency, construct (i.e., convergent and divergent) validity, discriminative power and test-retest reliability. Results Overall, 147 patients (mean age 65.6 years, SD = 10.4) completed the questionnaire after a median time of 45.4 months (IQR = 18.9–72.9) after spine surgery and/or radiotherapy. Internal consistency was good for the Physical function, Pain, and Mental health domains (α = 0.87, 0.86, 0.72), but not for Social function (α = 0.04). Good convergent validity was demonstrated except for Social function (rs = 0.37 95%CI = 0.21–0.51). Discriminative power between patients with ECOG performance scores of 0–1 and 2–4 was found on all domains and Neurological function items. Test-retest reliability was acceptable for Physical function, Pain and Mental health (ICC = 0.89 95%CI = 0.81–0.94, ICC = 0.88 95%CI = 0.78–0.93, ICC = 0.68 95%CI = 0.48–0.81), whereas ICC = 0.45 (95%CI = 0.17–0.66) for Social function was below threshold. After removing item 20 from the Social function domain, internal consistency improved, and convergent validity and test-retest reliability were good. Conclusion The Dutch version of the SOSGOQ2.0 questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to measure HRQOL in patients with spinal metastases. Item 20 was removed to retain psychometric properties. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05837-1.
Collapse
|
28
|
Couto AR, Parreira B, Power DM, Pinheiro L, Madruga Dias J, Novofastovski I, Eshed I, Sarzi-Puttini P, Pappone N, Atzeni F, Verlaan JJ, Kuperus J, Bieber A, Ambrosino P, Kiefer D, Khan MA, Mader R, Baraliakos X, Bruges-Armas J. Evidence for a genetic contribution to the ossification of spinal ligaments in Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A narrative review. Front Genet 2022; 13:987867. [PMID: 36276944 PMCID: PMC9586552 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.987867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH) and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL) are common disorders characterized by the ossification of spinal ligaments. The cause for this ossification is currently unknown but a genetic contribution has been hypothesized. Over the last decade, many studies on the genetics of ectopic calcification disorders have been performed, mainly on OPLL. Most of these studies were based on linkage analysis and case control association studies. Animal models have provided some clues but so far, the involvement of the identified genes has not been confirmed in human cases. In the last few years, many common variants in several genes have been associated with OPLL. However, these associations have not been at definitive levels of significance and evidence of functional significance is generally modest. The current evidence suggests a multifactorial aetiopathogenesis for DISH and OPLL with a subset of cases showing a stronger genetic component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Couto
- Hospital de Santo Espirito da Ilha Terceira EPER, SEEBMO, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Bruna Parreira
- Hospital de Santo Espirito da Ilha Terceira EPER, SEEBMO, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Deborah M. Power
- University of Algarve, Center of Marine Science (CCMAR), Faro, Portugal
| | - Luís Pinheiro
- Hospital de Santo Espirito da Ilha Terceira EPER, Orthopedics Service, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
| | - João Madruga Dias
- Centro Hospitalar Do Medio Tejo EPE Unidade de Torres Novas, Rheumatology Department, Santarém, Portugal
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, EpiDoc Research Unit, CEDOC, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Nicola Pappone
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neuromotor Rehabilitation Unit of Telese Terme Institute, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabiola Atzeni
- Universita Degli Studi di Messina, Rheumatology Unit, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Messina, Italy
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- University Medical Centre, Department of Orthopedics, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Amir Bieber
- Emek Medical Center, Rheumatology Unit, Afula, Israel
| | - Pasquale Ambrosino
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit of Telese Terme Institute, Pavia, Italy
| | - David Kiefer
- Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Reuven Mader
- Emek Medical Center, Rheumatology Unit, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- Ruhr University Bochum, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Jácome Bruges-Armas
- Hospital de Santo Espirito da Ilha Terceira EPER, SEEBMO, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
- *Correspondence: Jácome Bruges-Armas,
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Symptoms caused by spinal metastases are often difficult to distinguish from symptoms caused by non-malignant spinal disease, complicating timely diagnosis, referral and treatment. The ensuing delays may promote the risk of neurological deficits or severe mechanical instability and consequent emergency surgery, leading to poorer prognosis. Presumably, treatment delay may subsequently lead to more health-care consumption and therefore increased average costs of treatment. METHODS All patients surgically treated for spinal metastases were included in the current study. Based on the presence of alarming symptoms and urgency of the required intervention, patients were categorized as having received timely or delayed treatment. Pre-surgical, in-hospital, aftercare and total costs were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS In total, 299 patients were included, of which 205 underwent timely and 94 delayed treatment. There was no significant difference in pre-surigcal costs (€3.229,13 in the timely treated group vs. €2.528,70 in the delayed treatment group, p = 0.849). The in-hospital costs (€16.738,49 vs. €13.108,81, p < 0.001) and the aftercare costs (€13.950,37 vs. 3.981,93, p < 0.001) were significantly higher for delayed treatment vs. timely treatment, respectively. The total costs were €33.741,71 for delayed treatment and €20.318,52 for timely treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The total costs for timely treated patients with spinal metastases are significantly lower compared with patients receiving delayed treatment. Investing in the optimization of referral patterns may therefore reduce the overall pretreatment delay and subsequently increase patient outcome, leading to better clinical outcomes at lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris R. van Tol
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Julie R. A. Massier
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W. J. Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and
Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F. Cumhur Öner
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands,Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Department of
Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 (G05.228), 3508
GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yen HK, Hu MH, Zijlstra H, Groot OQ, Hsieh HC, Yang JJ, Karhade AV, Chen PC, Chen YH, Huang PH, Chen YH, Xiao FR, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Yang RS, Yang SH, Lin WH, Hsu FM. Prognostic significance of lab data and performance comparison by validating survival prediction models for patients with spinal metastases after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:159-166. [PMID: 36067909 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Well-performing survival prediction models (SPMs) help patients and healthcare professionals to choose treatment aligning with prognosis. This retrospective study aims to investigate the prognostic impacts of laboratory data and to compare the performances of Metastases location, Elderly, Tumor primary, Sex, Sickness/comorbidity, and Site of radiotherapy (METSSS) model, New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS), and Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2010 to 2018, patients who received radiotherapy (RT) for SM at a tertiary center were enrolled and the data were retrospectively collected. Multivariate logistic and Cox-proportional-hazard regression analyses were used to assess the association between laboratory values and survival. The area under receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUROC), calibration analysis, Brier score, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of SPMs. RESULTS A total of 2786 patients were included for analysis. The 90-day and 1-year survival rates after RT were 70.4% and 35.7%, respectively. Higher albumin, hemoglobin, or lymphocyte count were associated with better survival, while higher alkaline phosphatase, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, or international normalized ratio were associated with poor prognosis. SORG-MLA has the best discrimination (AUROC 90-day, 0.78; 1-year 0.76), best calibrations, and the lowest Brier score (90-day 0.16; 1-year 0.18). The decision curve of SORG-MLA is above the other two competing models with threshold probabilities from 0.1 to 0.8. CONCLUSION Laboratory data are of prognostic significance in survival prediction after RT for SM. Machine learning-based model SORG-MLA outperforms statistical regression-based model METSSS model and NESMS in survival predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Kuan Yen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hester Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Jiun-Jen Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Po-Chao Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Han Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hao Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hung Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Ren Xiao
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rong-Sen Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hua Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Feng-Ming Hsu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Harlianto NI, Kuperus JS, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, de Jong PA, de Ru JA, Öner FC, Verlaan JJ. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis of the cervical spine causing dysphagia and airway obstruction: an updated systematic review. Spine J 2022; 22:1490-1503. [PMID: 35283294 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by growing ossifications of spinal entheses and tendons, which may cause trachea and esophagus compression when located anteriorly in the cervical spine. PURPOSE Our previous systematic review on the epidemiological and clinical knowledge of dysphagia and airway obstruction caused by cervical DISH was updated, with a focus on (surgical) treatment and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of the literature was performed. METHODS Publications in Medline and EMBASE from July 2010 to June 2021 were searched. Two investigators performed data extraction and study specific quality assessment. RESULTS A total of 138 articles (112 case reports and 26 case series) were included, describing 419 patients with dysphagia and/or airway obstruction. The mean age of the patient group was 67.3 years (range: 35-91 years), and 85.4% was male. An evident increase of published cases was observed within the last decade. Surgical treatment was chosen for 66% of patients with the anterolateral approach most commonly used. The total complication rate after surgery was 22.1%, with 12.7% occurring within 1 month after intervention. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 95.5% of operated patients. After a mean follow-up of 3.7 years (range: 0.4-9.0 years), dysphagia recurred in 12 surgically treated patients (4%), of which five patients had osteophyte regrowth. CONCLUSIONS The number of published cases of dysphagia in patients with DISH has doubled in the last decade compared to our previous review. Yet, randomized studies or guidelines on the treatment or prevention on recurrence are lacking. Surgical treatment is effective and has low (major) complication rates. Common trends established across the cases in our study may help improve our understanding and management of dysphagia and airway obstruction in cervical DISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netanja I Harlianto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jonneke S Kuperus
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pim A de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob A de Ru
- Department of Otolaryngology, Ministry of Defense, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Cumhur Öner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Groot OQ, van Steijn NJ, Ogink PT, Pierik RJ, Bongers MER, Zijlstra H, de Groot TM, An TJ, Rabinov JD, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Preoperative embolization in surgical treatment of spinal metastases originating from non-hypervascular primary tumors: a propensity score matched study using 495 patients. Spine J 2022; 22:1334-1344. [PMID: 35263662 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Preoperative embolization (PE) reduces intraoperative blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases of hypervascular primary tumors such as thyroid and renal cell tumors. However, most spinal metastases originate from primary breast, prostate, and lung tumors and it remains unclear whether these and other spinal metastases benefit from PE. PURPOSE To assess the (1) efficacy of PE on the amount of intraoperative blood loss and safety in patients with spinal metastases originating from non-hypervascular primary tumors, and (2) secondary outcomes including perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, anesthesia time, hospitalization, postoperative complication within 30 days, reoperation, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective propensity-score matched, case-control study at 2 academic tertiary medical centers. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing surgery for spinal metastases originating from primary non-thyroid, non-renal cell, and non-hepatocellular tumors between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2016 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes were estimated amount of intraoperative blood loss and complications attributable to PE, such as neurologic injury, wound infection, thrombosis, or dissection. The secondary outcomes included perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, anesthesia time, hospitalization, postoperative complication within 30 days, reoperation, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. METHODS In total, 495 patients were identified, of which 54 (11%) underwent PE. After propensity score matching on 21 variables, including primary tumor, number of spinal levels, and surgical treatment, 53 non-PE patients were matched to 53 PE patients. Matching was adequate measured by comparing the matched variables, testing the standardized mean differences (<0.25), and inspecting Kernel density plots. The degree of embolization was noted to be complete, until stasis, or successful in 43 (80%) patients. RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss did not differ between both groups with a median blood loss in liters of 0.6 (IQR, 0.4-1.2) for non-PE patients and 0.9 (IQR, 0.6-1.2) for PE patients (p=.32). No complications occurred during embolization or the time between embolization and surgery. No differences were found in terms of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that, although no complications occurred and the embolization procedure can be considered safe, patients with non-hypervascular spinal metastases might not benefit from PE. A larger, prospective study could confirm or refute these study findings and aid in elucidating a subset of spinal metastases that might benefit from PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole J van Steijn
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Paul T Ogink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan Pierik
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Hester Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom M de Groot
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Thomas J An
- Department of Radiology, Radiology Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St. Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - James D Rabinov
- Department of Radiology, Radiology Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St. Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Steverink JG, van Tol FR, Oosterman BJ, Vermonden T, Verlaan JJ, Malda J, Piluso S. Robust gelatin hydrogels for local sustained release of bupivacaine following spinal surgery. Acta Biomater 2022; 146:145-158. [PMID: 35562007 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Adequate treatment of pain arising from spinal surgery is a major clinical challenge. Opioids are the mainstay of current treatment methods, but the frequency and severity of their side effects display a clear need for opioid-free analgesia. Local anesthetics have been encapsulated into sustained-release drug delivery systems to provide postoperative pain relief. However, these formulations are limited by rapid diffusion out of the surgical site. To overcome this limitation, we synthesized ring-shaped hydrogels incorporating bupivacaine, designed to be co-implanted with pedicle screws during spinal surgery. Hydrogels were prepared by riboflavin-mediated crosslinking of gelatin functionalized with tyramine moieties. Additionally, oxidized β-cyclodextrin was introduced into the hydrogel formulation to form dynamic bonds with tyramine functionalities, which enables self-healing behavior and resistance to shear. Feasibility of hydrogel implantation combined with pedicle screws was qualitatively assessed in cadaveric sheep as a model for instrumented spinal surgery. The in-situ crystallization of bupivacaine within the hydrogel matrix provided a moderate burst decrease and sustained release that exceeded 72 hours in vitro. The use of bupivacaine crystals decreased drug-induced cytotoxicity in vitro compared to bupivacaine HCl. Thus, the presented robust hydrogel formulation provides promising properties to enable the stationary release of non-opioid analgesics following spinal surgery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Currently, postoperative pain following spinal surgery is mainly treated with opioids. However, the use of opioids is associated with several side effects including addiction. Here we developed robust and cytocompatible gelatin hydrogels, prepared via riboflavin-mediated photocrosslinking, that can withstand orthopedic implantation. The implantability was confirmed in cadaveric instrumented spinal surgery. Further, hydrogels were loaded with bupivacaine crystals to provide sustained release beyond 72 hours in vitro. The use of crystallized bupivacaine decreased cytotoxicity compared to bupivacaine HCl. The present formulation can aid in enabling opioid-free analgesia following instrumented spinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper G Steverink
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT Utrecht, the Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, 3711 AA Austerlitz, the Netherlands
| | - Floris R van Tol
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, 3711 AA Austerlitz, the Netherlands
| | - Bas J Oosterman
- SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, 3711 AA Austerlitz, the Netherlands
| | - Tina Vermonden
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Science for Life, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, 3711 AA Austerlitz, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Malda
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584CL Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Susanna Piluso
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT Utrecht, the Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, 3711 AA Austerlitz, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Harlianto NI, Westerink J, Hol ME, Wittenberg R, Foppen W, van der Veen PH, van Ginneken B, Verlaan JJ, de Jong PA, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, Asselbergs FW, Nathoe HM, de Borst GJ, Bots ML, Geerlings MI, Emmelot MH, de Jong PA, Leiner T, Lely AT, van der Kaaij NP, Kappelle LJ, Ruigrok YM, Verhaar MC, Visseren FLJ, Westerink J. Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis have an increased burden of thoracic aortic calcifications. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 6:rkac060. [PMID: 35993014 PMCID: PMC9382268 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives. DISH has been associated with increased coronary artery calcifications and incident ischaemic stroke. The formation of bone along the spine may share pathways with calcium deposition in the aorta. We hypothesized that patients with DISH have increased vascular calcifications. Therefore we aimed to investigate the presence and extent of DISH in relation to thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) severity. Methods. This cross-sectional study included 4703 patients from the Second Manifestation of ARTerial disease cohort, consisting of patients with cardiovascular events or risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Chest radiographs were scored for DISH using the Resnick criteria. Different severities of TAC were scored arbitrarily from no TAC to mild, moderate or severe TAC. Using multivariate logistic regression, the associations between DISH and TAC were analysed with adjustments for age, sex, BMI, diabetes, smoking status, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, cholesterol lowering drug usage, renal function and blood pressure. Results. A total of 442 patients (9.4%) had evidence of DISH and 1789 (38%) patients had TAC. The prevalence of DISH increased from 6.6% in the no TAC group to 10.8% in the mild, 14.3% in the moderate and 17.1% in the severe TAC group. After adjustments, DISH was significantly associated with the presence of TAC [odds ratio (OR) 1.46 [95% CI 1.17, 1.82)]. In multinomial analyses, DISH was associated with moderate TAC [OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.06, 1.93)] and severe TAC [OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.19, 2.36)]. Conclusions. Subjects with DISH have increased TACs, providing further evidence that patients with DISH have an increased burden of vascular calcifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Westerink
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University , Utrecht
| | | | | | | | | | - Bram van Ginneken
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Steverink JG, Piluso S, Malda J, Verlaan JJ. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo Toxicity of Bupivacaine in Musculoskeletal Applications. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2022; 2:723883. [PMID: 35295435 PMCID: PMC8915669 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.723883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent societal debate on opioid use in treating postoperative pain has sparked the development of long-acting, opioid-free analgesic alternatives, often using the amino-amide local anesthetic bupivacaine as active pharmaceutical ingredient. A potential application is musculoskeletal surgeries, as these interventions rank amongst the most painful overall. Current literature showed that bupivacaine induced dose-dependent myo-, chondro-, and neurotoxicity, as well as delayed osteogenesis and disturbed wound healing in vitro. These observations did not translate to animal and clinical research, where toxic phenomena were seldom reported. An exception was bupivacaine-induced chondrotoxicity, which can mainly occur during continuous joint infusion. To decrease opioid consumption and provide sustained pain relief following musculoskeletal surgery, new strategies incorporating high concentrations of bupivacaine in drug delivery carriers are currently being developed. Local toxicity of these high concentrations is an area of further research. This review appraises relevant in vitro, animal and clinical studies on musculoskeletal local toxicity of bupivacaine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper G Steverink
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Susanna Piluso
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Developmental BioEngineering, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Jos Malda
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Groot OQ, Lans A, Twining PK, Bongers MER, Kapoor ND, Verlaan JJ, Newman ET, Raskin KA, Lozano-Calderon SA, Janssen SJ, Schwab JH. Clinical Outcome Differences in the Treatment of Impending Versus Completed Pathological Long-Bone Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:307-315. [PMID: 34851323 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome differences following surgery for an impending versus a completed pathological fracture have not been clearly defined. The purpose of the present study was to assess differences in outcomes following the surgical treatment of impending versus completed pathological fractures in patients with long-bone metastases in terms of (1) 90-day and 1-year survival and (2) intraoperative blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, anesthesia time, duration of hospitalization, 30-day postoperative systemic complications, and reoperations. METHODS We retrospectively performed a matched cohort study utilizing a database of 1,064 patients who had undergone operative treatment for 462 impending and 602 completed metastatic long-bone fractures. After matching on 22 variables, including primary tumor, visceral metastases, and surgical treatment, 270 impending pathological fractures were matched to 270 completed pathological fractures. The primary outcome was assessed with the Cox proportional hazard model. The secondary outcomes were assessed with the McNemar test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS The 90-day survival rate did not differ between the groups (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.56]; p = 0.48), but the 1-year survival rate was worse for completed pathological fractures (46% versus 38%) (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61]; p = 0.03). With regard to secondary outcomes, completed pathological fractures were associated with higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (p = 0.03), a higher rate of perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.01), longer anesthesia time (p = 0.04), and more reoperations (OR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.92 to 7.86]; p = 0.03); no differences were found in terms of the rate of 30-day postoperative complications or the duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing surgery for impending pathological fractures had lower 1-year mortality rates and better secondary outcomes as compared with patients undergoing surgery for completed pathological fractures when accounting for 22 covariates through propensity matching. Patients with an impending pathological fracture appear to benefit from prophylactic stabilization as stabilizing a completed pathological fracture seems to be associated with increased mortality, blood loss, rate of blood transfusions, duration of surgery, and reoperation risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Amanda Lans
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter K Twining
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neal D Kapoor
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik T Newman
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin A Raskin
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stein J Janssen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Paulino Pereira NR, Groot OQ, Verlaan JJ, Bongers MER, Twining PK, Kapoor ND, van Dijk CN, Schwab JH, Bramer JAM. Quality of Life Changes After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:38-48. [PMID: 34108371 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the quality of life (QoL) after open surgery for spinal metastases, and how surgery affects physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It remains questionable to what extent open surgery improves QoL for metastatic spinal disease, it would be interesting to quantify the magnitude and duration of QoL benefits-if any-after surgery for spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included were studies measuring QoL before and after nonpercutaneous, open surgery for spinal metastases for various indications including pain, spinal cord compression, instability, or tumor control. A random-effect model assessed standardized mean differences (SMDs) of summary QoL scores between baseline and 1, 3, 6, or 9-12 months after surgery. RESULTS The review yielded 10 studies for data extraction. The pooled QoL summary score improved from baseline to 1 month (SMD=1.09, P<0.001), to 3 months (SMD=1.28, P<0.001), to 6 months (SMD=1.21, P<0.001), and to 9-12 months (SMD=1.08, P=0.001). The surgery improved physical well-being during the first 3 months (SMD=0.94, P=0.022), improved emotional (SMD=1.19, P=0.004), and functional well-being (SMD=1.08, P=0.005) during the first 6 months, and only improved social/family well-being at month 6 (SMD=0.28, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS The surgery improved QoL for patients with spinal metastases, and rapidly improved physical, emotional, and functional well-being; it had minimal effect on social/family well-being. However, choosing the optimal candidate for surgical intervention in the setting of spinal metastases remains paramount: otherwise postoperative morbidity and complications may outbalance the intended benefits of surgery. Future research should report clear definitions of selection criteria and surgical indication and provide stratified QoL results by indication and clinical characteristics such as primary tumor type, preoperative Karnofsky, and Bilsky scores to elucidate the optimal candidate for surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuno R Paulino Pereira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam-Zuidoost
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam-Zuidoost
| | - Peter K Twining
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Neal D Kapoor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cornelis N van Dijk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam-Zuidoost
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jos A M Bramer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam-Zuidoost
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tseng TE, Lee CC, Yen HK, Groot OQ, Hou CH, Lin SY, Bongers MER, Hu MH, Karhade AV, Ko JC, Lai YH, Yang JJ, Verlaan JJ, Yang RS, Schwab JH, Lin WH. International Validation of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Extremity Metastases Undergoing Surgical Treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:367-378. [PMID: 34491920 PMCID: PMC8747677 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithms (SORG-MLAs) estimate 90-day and 1-year survival in patients with long-bone metastases undergoing surgical treatment and have demonstrated good discriminatory ability on internal validation. However, the performance of a prediction model could potentially vary by race or region, and the SORG-MLA must be externally validated in an Asian cohort. Furthermore, the authors of the original developmental study did not consider the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, a survival prognosticator repeatedly validated in other studies, in their algorithms because of missing data. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Is the SORG-MLA generalizable to Taiwanese patients for predicting 90-day and 1-year mortality? (2) Is the ECOG score an independent factor associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality while controlling for SORG-MLA predictions? METHODS All 356 patients who underwent surgery for long-bone metastases between 2014 and 2019 at one tertiary care center in Taiwan were included. Ninety-eight percent (349 of 356) of patients were of Han Chinese descent. The median (range) patient age was 61 years (25 to 95), 52% (184 of 356) were women, and the median BMI was 23 kg/m2 (13 to 39 kg/m2). The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (33% [116 of 356]) and breast cancer (16% [58 of 356]). Fifty-five percent (195 of 356) of patients presented with a complete pathologic fracture. Intramedullary nailing was the most commonly performed type of surgery (59% [210 of 356]), followed by plate screw fixation (23% [81 of 356]) and endoprosthetic reconstruction (18% [65 of 356]). Six patients were lost to follow-up within 90 days; 30 were lost to follow-up within 1 year. Eighty-five percent (301 of 356) of patients were followed until death or for at least 2 years. Survival was 82% (287 of 350) at 90 days and 49% (159 of 326) at 1 year. The model's performance metrics included discrimination (concordance index [c-index]), calibration (intercept and slope), and Brier score. In general, a c-index of 0.5 indicates random guess and a c-index of 0.8 denotes excellent discrimination. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes and the actual outcomes, with a perfect calibration having an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1. The Brier score of a prediction model must be compared with and ideally should be smaller than the score of the null model. A decision curve analysis was then performed for the 90-day and 1-year prediction models to evaluate their net benefit across a range of different threshold probabilities. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether the ECOG score was an independent prognosticator while controlling for the SORG-MLA's predictions. We did not perform retraining/recalibration because we were not trying to update the SORG-MLA algorithm in this study. RESULTS The SORG-MLA had good discriminatory ability at both timepoints, with a c-index of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.86) for 90-day survival prediction and a c-index of 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89) for 1-year survival prediction. However, the calibration analysis showed that the SORG-MLAs tended to underestimate Taiwanese patients' survival (90-day survival prediction: calibration intercept 0.78 [95% CI 0.46 to 1.10], calibration slope 0.74 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.96]; 1-year survival prediction: calibration intercept 0.75 [95% CI 0.49 to 1.00], calibration slope 1.22 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.49]). The Brier score of the 90-day and 1-year SORG-MLA prediction models was lower than their respective null model (0.12 versus 0.16 for 90-day prediction; 0.16 versus 0.25 for 1-year prediction), indicating good overall performance of SORG-MLAs at these two timepoints. Decision curve analysis showed SORG-MLAs provided net benefits when threshold probabilities ranged from 0.40 to 0.95 for 90-day survival prediction and from 0.15 to 1.0 for 1-year prediction. The ECOG score was an independent factor associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.94 [95% CI 1.01 to 3.73]) but not 1-year mortality (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.53 to 2.17]) after controlling for SORG-MLA predictions for 90-day and 1-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSION SORG-MLAs retained good discriminatory ability in Taiwanese patients with long-bone metastases, although their actual survival time was slightly underestimated. More international validation and incremental value studies that address factors such as the ECOG score are warranted to refine the algorithms, which can be freely accessed online at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-En Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Che Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chun-Han Hou
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Ying Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Michiel E. R. Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Aditya V. Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jia-Chi Ko
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsiang Lai
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Jen Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joseph H. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei-Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pielkenrood BJ, Gal R, Kasperts N, Verhoeff JJC, Bartels MMTJ, Seravalli E, van der Linden YM, Monninkhof EM, Verlaan JJ, van der Velden JM, Verkooijen HM. Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in Patients With Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:1203-1215. [PMID: 35017007 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Painful bone metastases hamper quality of life (QoL). The aim of this prespecified secondary analysis of the PRESENT trial was to compare change in global QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, functional interference, and psychosocial aspects after conventional radiation therapy (cRT) versus stereotactic body RT (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 110 patients were enrolled in the phase 2 randomized controlled VERTICAL trial (NCT02364115) following the "trials within cohorts" design and randomized 1:1 to cRT or SBRT. Patient-reported global QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, functional interference, and psychosocial aspects were assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire (QLQ) Core 15 Palliative Care and QLQ Bone Metastases 22 modules. Changes in QoL domains over time were compared between patients treated with cRT and SBRT using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) linear mixed model analysis adjusting for baseline scores. Proportions of patients in the cRT versus SBRT arm reporting a clinically relevant change in QoL within 3 months were compared using a χ2 test. RESULTS QoL scores had improved over time and were comparable between groups for all domains in both the ITT and PP analyses, except for functional interference and psychological aspects in the ITT. Functional interference scores had improved more after 12 weeks in the cRT arm than in the SBRT arm (25.5 vs 14.1 points, respectively; effect size [ES] = 0.49, P = .04). Psychosocial aspects scores had improved more after 8 weeks in the cRT arm than in the SBRT arm (12.2 vs 7.3; ES = 0.56, P = .04). No clinically relevant differences between groups at 12 weeks in terms of global QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, functional interference, and psychosocial aspects were observed. CONCLUSIONS Palliative RT improves QoL. Both SBRT and cRT have a comparable effect on patient-reported QoL outcomes in patients with painful bone metastases. Functional interference and psychological aspects scores improved more in patients treated with cRT versus patients offered SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart J Pielkenrood
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Departments of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Departments of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcia M T J Bartels
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Departments of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Departments Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M van der Velden
- Departments of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Harlianto NI, Mohamed Hoesein FA, de Jong PA, Verlaan JJ, Westerink J. Pseudohypoparathyroidism mimicking cervical diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis with dysphagia: A case report and literature review. Bone Rep 2021; 15:101111. [PMID: 34381851 PMCID: PMC8339251 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Dysphagia due to extensive ossification at anterior segments of the cervical spine is a rare occurrence and is usually attributable to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). We present the case of a 74-year-old female with dysphagia most likely due to ossification in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a (PHP1a). PHP1a is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the GNAS1 gene. Our patient had characteristic phenotype features of PHP1a, also known as Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO), which was diagnosed without genetic confirmation. She was conservatively treated with dietary measures and observation, and reported persisting symptoms of dysphagia at six-month follow-up. This is the first case to describe dysphagia in PHP1a with a similar presentation to DISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netanja I. Harlianto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pim A. de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Westerink
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Versteeg AL, Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Verlaan JJ, Wessels H, Fisher CG, Verkooijen HM. Expectations of treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases; what do we tell our patients? A qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1263. [PMID: 34814886 PMCID: PMC8611925 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08993-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Realistic pre-treatment expectations are important and have been associated with post-treatment health related quality of life (HRQOL). Patient expectations are greatly influenced by physicians, as they are the primary resource for information. This study aimed to explore the communication practices of physicians regarding treatment outcomes for patients with spinal metastases, and physician experiences with patients’ pre-treatment expectations. Methods An international qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with physicians routinely involved in treating metastatic spine disease (spine surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, and rehabilitation specialists) was conducted. Physicians were interviewed about the content and extent of information they provide to patients with spinal metastases regarding treatment options, risks and treatment outcomes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematic coding network. Results After 22 interviews data saturation occurred. The majority of the physicians indicated that they currently do not establish patients’ pre-treatment expectations, despite acknowledging the importance of these expectations. Spine surgeons often believe that patient expectations are disproportionate. Physicians expressed they manage expectations by detailing the most common risks and providing a broad but nonspecific overview of treatment outcomes. While the palliative intent seems clear to the physicians, their perception is that the implications of a palliative treatment remains elusive to most patients. Conclusion This study highlights the current gap in patient-physician communication regarding expectations of treatment outcomes of patients with spinal metastases. These results warrant further research to improve communication practices and determine the effect of patient expectations on patient reported outcomes in this population. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08993-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L Versteeg
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Division of Imaging and Cancer, Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Raphaele Charest-Morin
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester Wessels
- Department of Corporate Communications, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles G Fisher
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Harlianto NI, Oosterhof N, Foppen W, Hol ME, Wittenberg R, van der Veen PH, van Ginneken B, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, Verlaan JJ, de Jong PA, Westerink J. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis is associated with incident stroke in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:2867-2874. [PMID: 34791065 PMCID: PMC9258598 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Earlier retrospective studies have suggested a relation between diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis [DISH] and cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction. The present study assessed the association between DISH and incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with high cardiovascular risk. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, we included 4624 patients (mean age 58.4 years, 69.6% male) from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease cohort. The main end point was major cardiovascular events [MACE: stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death]. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and separate vascular events. Cause specific proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of DISH on all outcomes, and subdistribution hazard models were used to evaluate the effect of DISH on the cumulative incidence. All models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, diabetes, non-HDL cholesterol, packyears, renal function, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS DISH was present in 435 (9.4%) patients. After a median follow-up of 8.7 (IQR 5.0-12.0) years, 864 patients had died and 728 patients developed a MACE event. DISH was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke.After adjustment in cause specific modelling, DISH remained significantly associated with ischaemic stroke (HR 1.55; 95%CI : 1.01-2.38), but not with MACE (HR 0.99; 95%CI : 0.79-1.24), myocardial infarction (HR 0.88; 95%CI : 0.59-1.31), vascular death (HR 0.94; 95%CI : 0.68-1.27), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.94; 95%CI : 0.77-1.16). CONCLUSION The presence of DISH is independently associated with an increased incidence and risk for ischaemic stroke, but not with MACE, myocardial infarction, vascular death, or all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netanja I Harlianto
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Nadine Oosterhof
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Wouter Foppen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Marjolein E Hol
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Rianne Wittenberg
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, the Netherlands, Amsterdam
| | - Pieternella H van der Veen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Bram van Ginneken
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Pim A de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Netherlands, Utrecht, the
| | - Jan Westerink
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands, Utrecht
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Skalitzky MK, Gulbrandsen TR, Groot OQ, Karhade AV, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Miller BJ. The preoperative machine learning algorithm for extremity metastatic disease can predict 90-day and 1-year survival: An external validation study. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:282-289. [PMID: 34608991 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prediction of survival is valuable to optimize treatment of metastatic long-bone disease. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) machine-learning (ML) algorithm has been previously developed and internally validated. The purpose of this study was to determine if the SORG ML algorithm accurately predicts 90-day and 1-year survival in an external metastatic long-bone disease patient cohort. METHODS A retrospective review of 264 patients who underwent surgery for long-bone metastases between 2003 and 2019 was performed. Variables used in the stochastic gradient boosting SORG algorithm were age, sex, primary tumor type, visceral/brain metastases, systemic therapy, and 10 preoperative laboratory values. Model performance was calculated by discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. RESULTS The SORG ML algorithms retained good discriminative ability (area under the cure [AUC]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.88 for 90-day mortality and AUC: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79-0.88 for 1-year mortality), calibration, overall performance, and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION The previously developed ML algorithms demonstrated good performance in the current study, thereby providing external validation. The models were incorporated into an accessible application (https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/) that may be freely utilized by clinicians in helping predict survival for individual patients and assist in informative decision-making discussion before operative management of long bone metastatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kate Skalitzky
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Trevor R Gulbrandsen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin J Miller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ogink PT, Groot OQ, Karhade AV, Bongers MER, Oner FC, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:526-531. [PMID: 34109892 PMCID: PMC8519550 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1932928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Advancements in software and hardware have enabled the rise of clinical prediction models based on machine learning (ML) in orthopedic surgery. Given their growing popularity and their likely implementation in clinical practice we evaluated which outcomes these new models have focused on and what methodologies are being employed.Material and methods - We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to June 18, 2020. Studies reporting on non-ML prediction models or non-orthopedic outcomes were excluded. After screening 7,138 studies, 59 studies reporting on 77 prediction models were included. We extracted data regarding outcome, study design, and reported performance metrics.Results - Of the 77 identified ML prediction models the most commonly reported outcome domain was medical management (17/77). Spinal surgery was the most commonly involved orthopedic subspecialty (28/77). The most frequently employed algorithm was neural networks (42/77). Median size of datasets was 5,507 (IQR 635-26,364). The median area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80 (IQR 0.73-0.86). Calibration was reported for 26 of the models and 14 provided decision-curve analysis.Interpretation - ML prediction models have been developed for a wide variety of topics in orthopedics. Topics regarding medical management were the most commonly studied. Heterogeneity between studies is based on study size, algorithm, and time-point of outcome. Calibration and decision-curve analysis were generally poorly reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Ogink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht – Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Correspondence:
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - F Cumhur Oner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht – Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht – Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Groot OQ, Bindels BJJ, Ogink PT, Kapoor ND, Twining PK, Collins AK, Bongers MER, Lans A, Oosterhoff JHF, Karhade AV, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH. Availability and reporting quality of external validations of machine-learning prediction models with orthopedic surgical outcomes: a systematic review. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:385-393. [PMID: 33870837 PMCID: PMC8436968 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1910448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - External validation of machine learning (ML) prediction models is an essential step before clinical application. We assessed the proportion, performance, and transparent reporting of externally validated ML prediction models in orthopedic surgery, using the Transparent Reporting for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines.Material and methods - We performed a systematic search using synonyms for every orthopedic specialty, ML, and external validation. The proportion was determined by using 59 ML prediction models with only internal validation in orthopedic surgical outcome published up until June 18, 2020, previously identified by our group. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. The TRIPOD guidelines assessed transparent reporting.Results - We included 18 studies externally validating 10 different ML prediction models of the 59 available ML models after screening 4,682 studies. All external validations identified in this review retained good discrimination. Other key performance measures were provided in only 3 studies, rendering overall performance evaluation difficult. The overall median TRIPOD completeness was 61% (IQR 43-89), with 6 items being reported in less than 4/18 of the studies.Interpretation - Most current predictive ML models are not externally validated. The 18 available external validation studies were characterized by incomplete reporting of performance measures, limiting a transparent examination of model performance. Further prospective studies are needed to validate or refute the myriad of predictive ML models in orthopedics while adhering to existing guidelines. This ensures clinicians can take full advantage of validated and clinically implementable ML decision tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Bas J J Bindels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Paul T Ogink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Neal D Kapoor
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Peter K Twining
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Austin K Collins
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Amanda Lans
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien H F Oosterhoff
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Orthopedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Steverink JG, Oostinga D, van Tol FR, van Rijen MHP, Mackaaij C, Verlinde-Schellekens SAMW, Oosterman BJ, Van Wijck AJM, Roeling TAP, Verlaan JJ. Sensory Innervation of Human Bone: An Immunohistochemical Study to Further Understand Bone Pain. J Pain 2021; 22:1385-1395. [PMID: 33964414 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Skeletal diseases and their surgical treatment induce severe pain. The innervation density of bone potentially explains the severe pain reported. Animal studies concluded that sensory myelinated A∂-fibers and unmyelinated C-fibers are mainly responsible for conducting bone pain, and that the innervation density of these nerve fibers was highest in periosteum. However, literature regarding sensory innervation of human bone is scarce. This observational study aimed to quantify sensory nerve fiber density in periosteum, cortical bone, and bone marrow of axial and appendicular human bones using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis demonstrated that the total number of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers was highest in periosteum, followed by bone marrow, and cortical bone for all bones studied. Bone from thoracic vertebral bodies contained most sensory nerve fibers, followed by the upper extremity, lower extremity, and parietal neurocranium. The number of nerve fibers declined with age and did not differ between male and female specimens. Sensory nerve fibers were organized as a branched network throughout the periosteum. The current results provide an explanation for the severe pain accompanying skeletal disease, fracture, or surgery. Further, the results could provide more insight into mechanisms that generate and maintain skeletal pain and might aid in developing new treatment strategies. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the innervation of human bone and assesses the effect of age, gender, bone compartment and type of bone on innervation density. The presented data provide an explanation for the severity of bone pain arising from skeletal diseases and their surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper G Steverink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, Austerlitz, The Netherlands.
| | - Douwe Oostinga
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris R van Tol
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, Austerlitz, The Netherlands
| | - Mattie H P van Rijen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Mackaaij
- Department of Anatomy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bas J Oosterman
- SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, Austerlitz, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J M Van Wijck
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom A P Roeling
- Department of Anatomy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; SentryX B.V., Woudenbergseweg 41, Austerlitz, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Groot OQ, Hundersmarck D, Lans A, Bongers MER, Karhade AV, Zhang Y, van Tol FR, Verlaan JJ, Mohebali J, Schwab JH. Postoperative adverse events secondary to iatrogenic vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery. Spine J 2021; 21:795-802. [PMID: 33152509 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior lumbar spine surgery (ALSS) requires mobilization of the great vessels, resulting in a high risk of iatrogenic vascular injury (VI). It remains unclear whether VI is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications and other related adverse outcomes. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the incidence of postoperative complications attributable to VI during ALSS, and (2) outcomes secondary to VI such as procedural blood loss, transfusion of blood products, length of stay (LOS), and in hospital mortality. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective propensity-score matched, case-control study at 2 academic and 3 community medical centers, PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing ALSS between January 1st, 2000 and July 31st, 2019 were included in this analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications attributable to VI, such as venous thromboembolism, compartment syndrome, transfusion reaction, limb ischemia, and reoperations. The secondary outcomes included estimated operative blood loss (milliliter), transfused blood products, LOS (days), and in-hospital mortality. METHODS In total, 1,035 patients were identified, of which 75 (7.2%) had a VI. For comparative analyses, the 75 VI patients were paired with 75 comparable non-VI patients by propensity-score matching. The adequacy of the matching was assessed by testing the standardized mean differences (SMD) between VI and non-VI group (>0.25 SMD). RESULTS Two patients (2.7%) had VI-related postoperative complications in the studied period, which consisted of two deep venous thromboembolisms (DVTs) occurring on day 3 and 7 postoperatively. Both DVTs were located in the distal left common iliac vein (CIV). The VI these patients suffered were to the distal inferior vena cava and the left CIV, respectively. Both patients did not develop additional complications in consequence of their DVTs, however, did require systemic anticoagulation and placement of an inferior vena cava filter. There was no statistical difference with the non-VI group where no instances (0%) of postoperative complications were reported (p=.157). No differences were found in LOS or in hospital mortality between the two groups (p=.157 and p=.999, respectively). Intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were both found to be higher in the VI group in comparison to the non-VI group (650 mL, interquartile range [IQR] 300-1400 vs. 150 mL, IQR 50-425, p≤.001; 0 units, IQR 0-3 vs. 0 units, IQR 0-1, p=.012, respectively). CONCLUSION This study found a low number of serious postoperative complications related to VI in ALSS. In addition, these complications were not significantly different between the VI and matched non-VI ALSS cohort. Although not significant, the found DVT incidence of 2.7% after VI in ALSS warrants vigilance and preventive measures during the postoperative course of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3584 CX.
| | - Dennis Hundersmarck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3584 CX
| | - Amanda Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3584 CX
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Floris R van Tol
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3584 CX
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3584 CX
| | - Jahan Mohebali
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mader R, Baraliakos X, Eshed I, Novofastovski I, Bieber A, Verlaan JJ, Kiefer D, Pappone N, Atzeni F. Imaging of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2019-001151. [PMID: 32111653 PMCID: PMC7046956 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterised by calcification and ossification of ligaments and entheses. The condition usually affects the axial skeleton, in particular, at the thoracic segment, though also other portions of the spine are often involved. DISH often involves also peripheral tendinous and/or entheseal sites either alone, or in association with the involvement of peripheral joints. At times, new bone formation involves the bone itself, but sometimes it involves joints not usually affected by osteoarthritis (OA) which result in bony enlargement of the epiphysis, joints space narrowing and a reduced range of motion. Because of the entheseal involvement, DISH can be mistaken for seronegative spondyloarthropathies or for a "simple" OA. Furthermore, other implications for the recognition of DISH include spinal fractures, difficult intubation and upper endoscopies, decreased response rates in DISH with concomitant spondyloarthritides, and increased likelihood to be affected by metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. This Atlas is intended to show the imaging finding in DISH in patients diagnosed with the condition by the Resnick classification criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xenofon Baraliakos
- Rheumatologie Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Iris Eshed
- Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal imaging Center, Tel Aviv University Israel, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David Kiefer
- Rheumatologie, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, NRW, Germany.,Rheumatologie, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nicola Pappone
- Rheumatology Rehabilitation, Fondazione S. Maugeri, Telese Terme, Italy
| | - Fabiola Atzeni
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Groot OQ, Paulino Pereira NR, Bongers MER, Ogink PT, Newman ET, Verlaan JJ, Raskin KA, Lozano-Calderon SA, Schwab JH. Do Cohabitants Reliably Complete Questionnaires for Patients in a Terminal Cancer Stage when Assessing Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:792-801. [PMID: 33165035 PMCID: PMC8083839 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with bone metastases often are unable to complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, and cohabitants (such as spouses, domestic partners, offspring older than 18 years, or other people who live with the patient) could be a reliable alternative. However, the extent of reliability in this complicated patient population remains undefined, and the influence of the cohabitant's condition on their assessment of the patient's QoL is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Do QoL scores, measured by the 5-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) version and the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) version 1.0 in three domains (anxiety, pain interference, and depression), reported by patients differ markedly from scores as assessed by their cohabitants? (2) Do cohabitants' PROMIS-Depression scores correlate with differences in measured QoL results? METHODS This cross-sectional study included patients and cohabitants older than 18 years of age. Patients included those with presence of histologically confirmed bone metastases (including lymphoma and multiple myeloma), and cohabitants must have been present at the clinic visit. Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study regardless of comorbidities, prognosis, prior surgery, or current treatment. Between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017 and between October 1, 2017 and February 26, 2018, all 96 eligible patients were approached, of whom 49% (47) met the selection criteria and were willing to participate. The included 47 patient-cohabitant pairs independently completed the EQ-5D-5L and the eight-item PROMIS for three domains (anxiety, pain, and depression) with respect to the patients' symptoms. The cohabitants also completed the four-item PROMIS-Depression survey with respect to their own symptoms. RESULTS There were no clinically important differences between the scores of patients and their cohabitants for all questionnaires, and the agreement between patient and cohabitant scores was moderate to strong (Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.72 on the four questionnaires; all p values < 0.05). However, despite the good agreement in QoL scores, an increased cohabitant's depression score was correlated with an overestimation of the patient's symptom burden for the anxiety and depression domains (weak Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.33 [95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.58]; p = 0.01 and moderate Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.52 [95% CI 0.29 to 0.74]; p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION The present findings support that cohabitants might be reliable raters of the QoL of patients with bone metastases. However, if a patient's cohabitant has depression, the cohabitant may overestimate a patient's symptoms in emotional domains such as anxiety and depression, warranting further research that includes cohabitants with and without depression to elucidate the effect of depression on the level of agreement. For now, clinicians may want to reconsider using the cohabitant's judgement if depression is suspected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings suggest that a cohabitant's impressions of a patient's quality of life are, in most instances, accurate; this is potentially helpful in situations where the patient cannot weigh in. Future studies should employ longitudinal designs to see how or whether our findings change over time and with disease progression, and how specific interventions-like different chemotherapeutic regimens or surgery-may factor in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul T Ogink
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik T Newman
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin A Raskin
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- O. Q. Groot, N. R. P. Pereira, M. E. R. Bongers, P. T. Ogink, E. T. Newman, K. A. Raskin, S. A. Lozano-Calderon, J. H. Schwab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- O. Q. Groot, P. T. Ogink, J. J. Verlaan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht - Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bartels MMTJ, Gal R, van der Velden JM, Verhoeff JJC, Verlaan JJ, Verkooijen HM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life and emotional wellbeing in patients with bone metastases treated with radiotherapy: a prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:209-217. [PMID: 33634347 PMCID: PMC7906245 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10079-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Implementation of COVID-19 measures may have induced concerns about access and quality of health care for cancer patients with bone metastases, and it may have affected their quality of life. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown on quality of life and emotional functioning of patients with stage IV cancer treated for painful bone metastases in the UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands. A COVID-19 specific questionnaire was sent to active participants in the Prospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe meTastases (PRESENT) cohort, consisting of patients irradiated for metastatic bone disease. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with the last two PROs collected within the PRESENT cohort before the COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands on the 16th of March. For the 169 (53%) responders, median age at start of lockdown was 68 years (range 38–92) and 62% were male. Patients reported a statistically significant decrease in emotional functioning (83.6 to 79.2, P = 0.004) and in general quality of life score during the COVID-19 lockdown (72.4 to 68.7, P = 0.007). A steep increase in feeling isolated was reported (18% before and 67% during lockdown). This study has shown a strong increase in the experience of isolation and a decrease of emotional functioning and general quality of life during the COVID-19 lockdown in cancer patients with bone metastases. Due to the nature of the treatment of this patient population, efforts should be made to minimize these changes during future lockdowns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M T J Bartels
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Trial Office, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Internal mail Q.00.311, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - R Gal
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Trial Office, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Internal mail Q.00.311, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J M van der Velden
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J C Verhoeff
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Verlaan
- Division of Surgical Specialties, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Trial Office, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Internal mail Q.00.311, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|