Aggressiveness of care at end of life in patients with high-grade glioma

Palliative care integration and end-of-life care intensity for patients with NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic driver mutations is considered to have a poor prognosis, although recent therapeutic progress. This study aims to assess the real-life integration of palliative care (PC) and the intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care for this population.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of decedent patients from metastatic NSCLC without oncogenic driver mutations over the period 01/2018 to 12/2022, treated in first line with immunotherapy +/- chemotherapy. We analysed PC integration and aggressiveness criteria of EOL care in the last month before death: systemic anti-cancer treatment administration, emergency room visits, intensive care unit admission, hospitalization, hospitalization duration > 14 days, and hospital death.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients, 75 (50 %) met the PC team at least once, and the median time from the first encounter to death was 2.3 months. In the last month before death, at least one criterion of aggressive EOL care was present for 97 patients (70 %). For patients with PC use < 30 days and for patients with PC use < 90 days before death, there were significant changes: increase in the frequency of systemic anti-cancer treatment (respectively 51.1 % vs 20 %; p < 0.001 and 58.7 % vs 6.2 %; p < 0.001); decrease in hospitalization lasting > 14 days (respectively 30 % vs 7 %; p = 0.001 and 36 % vs 6.2 %; p = 0.018) and in death hospitalisation (respectively 66 % and 18 %; p < 0.001 and 58.7 % and 10.3 %; p < 0.001). After adjusting for the factors tested, patients with no PC or late PC use in the last month before death or in the last three month before death, the odds ratio (OR) remained significantly greater than 1 (respectively OR = 3.97 [1.70; 9.98]; p = 0.001 and OR = 23.1 [5.21-177.0], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PC is still insufficiently integrated for patients with NSCL cancer. Cancer centres should monitor key indicators such as PC use and aggressiveness criteria of EOL care.

Patterns of care at the end of life: a retrospective study of Italian patients with advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To better understand the type of care offered to Italian patients with advanced breast cancer at the End-of-Life (EoL), we conducted a retrospective observational study. EoL was defined as the period of six months before death.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-one patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated at IRCCS San Martino Policlinic Hospital who died between 2017 and 2021 were included. Data about patient, disease, and treatment characteristics from breast cancer diagnosis to death, along with information about comorbidities, medications, imaging, specialist evaluations, hospitalization, palliative care and home care, hospice admissions, and site of death were collected.

RESULTS

98.3% of the patients received at least one line of active treatment at EoL; 52.8% were hospitalized during the selected period. Palliative (13.9%), psychological (7.4%), and nutritional evaluations (8.2%) were underutilized. Palliative home care was provided to 52% of the patients. Most of the patients died at home (66.1%) and fewer than one out of five (18.2%) died at the hospital. Among the patients who died at home, 27.3% had no palliative support.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that palliative care in EoL breast cancer patients is still inadequate. Only a minority of patients had psychological and nutritional support While low nutritional support may be explained by the fact that typical symptoms of ABC do not involve the gastrointestinal tract, the lack of psychological support suggests that significant barriers still exist. Data on the site of death are encouraging, indicating that EoL management is increasingly home centered in Italy.

Characterization of patients with brain metastases referred to palliative care

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, reasons for referral, and outcomes of patients with brain metastases (BM) referred to the supportive care center.

METHODS

Equal numbers of patients with melanoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer with (N = 90) and without (N = 90) BM were retrospectively identified from the supportive care database for study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic, disease, and clinical data. Kaplan Meier method was used to evaluate survival outcomes.

RESULTS

While physical symptom management was the most common reason for referral to supportive care for both patients with and without BM, patients with BM had significantly lower pain scores on ESAS at time of referral (p = 0.002). They had greater interaction with acute care in the last weeks of life, with higher rates of ICU admission, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations after initial supportive care (SC) visit. The median survival time from referral to Supportive Care Center (SCC) was 0.90 years (95% CI 0.73, 1.40) for the brain metastasis group and 1.29 years (95% CI 0.91, 2.29) for the group without BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BM have shorter survival and greater interaction with acute care in the last weeks of life. This population also has distinct symptom burdens from patients without BM. Strategies to optimize integration of SC for patients with BM warrant ongoing study.

Effect of palliative care decisions making on hospital service use at end-of-life in patients with malignant brain tumors: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) improves Quality of life and reduces the symptom burden. Aggressive treatments at end of life (EOL) postpone PC. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the timing of the PC decision i.e., termination of cancer-specific treatments and focusing on symptom-centered PC, and its impact on the use of tertiary hospital services at the EOL.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on brain tumor patients, who were treated at the Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Helsinki University Hospital from November 1993 to December 2014 and died between January 2013 and December 2014, were retrospectively reviewed. The analysis comprised 121 patients (76 glioblastoma multiforme, 74 males; mean age 62 years; range 26-89). The decision for PC, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations were collected from hospital records.

RESULTS

The PC decision was made for 78% of the patients. The median survival after diagnosis was 16 months (13 months patients with glioblastoma), and after the PC decision, it was 44 days (range 1-293). 31% of the patients received anticancer treatments within 30 days and 17% within the last 14 day before death. 22% of the patients visited an ED, and 17% were hospitalized during the last 30 days of life. Of the patients who had a PC decision made more than 30 days prior to death, only 4% visited an ED or were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in the last 30 days of life compared to patients with a late (< 30 days prior to death) or no PC decision (25 patients, 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Every third patient with malignant brain tumors had anticancer treatments during the last month of life with a significant number of ED visits and hospitalizations. Postponing the PC decision to the last month of life increases the risk of tertiary hospital resource use at EOL.

Pattern of care of brain tumor patients in the last months of life: analysis of a cohort of 3045 patients in the last 10 years

BACKGROUND

End-of-life in patients with brain cancer presents special challenges, and palliative care approach is underutilized. Patients with brain cancer, in the last months of life, receive frequent hospital readmissions, highlighting bad end-of-life care quality. Early integration of palliative care improves quality of care in advanced stage of disease and patient's quality of death.

PURPOSE

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients with brain cancer discharged after diagnosis to evaluate pattern of treatment and rate of hospital readmission in the last months of life.

DESIGN

Data were collected from the Lazio Region Healthcare database.

SETTING

Adult patients discharged with diagnosis ICD-9 191.* between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 6672 patients were identified, and 3045 deaths were included. In the last 30 days 33% were readmitted to the hospital and 24.2% to the emergency room. 11.7% were treated with chemotherapy and 6% with radiotherapy. Most indicators of end-of-life care showed wide variability by hospital of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies to improve quality of care at the end of life and to decrease re-hospitalization and futile treatments are becoming increasingly important to improve quality of death and reduce healthcare costs. Variability observed by hospital of discharge indicates the lack of a standard approach to end-of-life care.

Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues in Patients with Brain Cancer Admitted to ICU

Background and Objectives: Palliative care is an interdisciplinary medical specialty focused on improving the quality of life of critically ill patients, including those with frailty, during their illness. Materials and Methods: We conducted an extensive literature review on Pubmed focusing on palliative care in neuro-oncology patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Results: We identified 967 articles and, after excluding 952 articles in accordance with the PRISMA flow chart, we included a total of 15 articles in the final selection. The potential role of palliative care in neuro-oncology appears necessary to ensure comprehensive end-of-life patient care. However, this seems underestimated and poorly applied, especially in the context of intensive care units. Medical personnel also face ethical dilemmas, considering not only the pathology but also the socio-spiritual context of the patient. In addition, caregivers' understanding of prognosis and realistic goals is critical for optimal end-of-life management. Conclusions: The provision of palliative care to neuro-oncological patients admitted to ICU is a complex challenge supported by fragmented evidence. Additional research on palliative care and communication about end-of-life care in the neuro-oncology and neuro-ICU setting is needed.

Cuproptosis key gene FDX1 is a prognostic biomarker and associated with immune infiltration in glioma

Recent studies have found that the protein encoded by the FDX1 gene is involved in mediating Cuproptosis as a regulator of protein lipoylation and related to immune response process of tumors. However, the specific biological function of FDX1 in glioma is currently unclear. To explore the potential function of FDX1, this study explored the correlation between the expression of FDX1 in cancers and survival prognosis by analyzing the public databases of GEPIA and Cbioportal. Immune infiltration was analyzed by the TIMER2.0 database in tumors. The possible biological processes and functions of FDX1-related in glioma were annotated through gene enrichment. Relationship between Cuproptosis and autophagy was explored through gene co-expression studies. Summary and conclusions of this study: (1) FDX1 is highly expressed in gliomas and associated with poor prognosis in low-grade gliomas (LGG). (2) Gene annotation indicates that FDX1 is mainly involved in the tumor protein lipoylation and cell death. (3) FDX1 expression is positively correlated with the infiltration of immune cells. (4) LIPT2 and NNAT, two other genes involved in lipoylation, may be unidentified marker gene for Cuproptosis. And the Cuproptosis genes related to FDX1 were positively correlated with the expression of autophagy marker genes Atg5, Atg12, and BECN-1. This evidence suggests that there may be some interaction between FDX1 mediated Cuproptosis and autophagy. In summary, FDX1 may serve as a potential immunotherapy target and prognostic marker for Glioma.

Neurosurgical Clinical Trials for Glioblastoma: Current and Future Directions

The mainstays of glioblastoma treatment, maximal safe resection, radiotherapy preserving neurological function, and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy have not changed for the past 17 years despite significant advances in the understanding of the genetics and molecular biology of glioblastoma. This review highlights the neurosurgical foundation for glioblastoma therapy. Here, we review the neurosurgeon’s role in several new and clinically-approved treatments for glioblastoma. We describe delivery techniques such as blood–brain barrier disruption and convection-enhanced delivery (CED) that may be used to deliver therapeutic agents to tumor tissue in higher concentrations than oral or intravenous delivery. We mention pivotal clinical trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma and explain their outcomes. Finally, we take a glimpse at ongoing clinical trials and promising translational studies to predict ways that new therapies may improve the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma.