Intermediate clinical endpoints in early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of individual patient data from the Gruppo Italiano Mammella and Mammella Intergruppo trials

Background

Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) are frequently used as primary endpoint in randomised trials (RCTs). We aim to assess whether changes in different ICEs can be used to predict changes in overall survival (OS) in adjuvant breast cancer trials.

Methods

Individual patient level data from adjuvant phase III RCTs conducted by the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) and Mammella Intergruppo (MIG) study groups were used. ICEs were computed according to STEEP criteria. Using a two-stage meta-analytic model, we assessed the surrogacy of each ICE at both the outcome (i.e., OS and ICE are correlated irrespective of treatment) and trial (i.e., treatment effects on ICE and treatment effect on OS are correlated) levels. The following ICEs were considered as potential surrogate endpoints of OS: disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS). The estimates of the degree of correlation were obtained by copula models and weighted linear regression. Kendall's τ and R2 ≥ 0.70 were considered as indicators of a clinically relevant surrogacy.

Findings

Among the 12,397 patients enrolled from November 1992 to July 2012 in six RCTs, median age at enrolment was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49-65). After a median follow-up of 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-14.5), 2131 (17.2%) OS events were observed, with 1390 (65.2%) attributed to breast cancer. At the outcome-level, Kendall's τ ranged from 0.69 for BCFI to 0.84 for DRFS. For DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, BCFI, and IBCFS endpoints, over 95% of the 8-year OS variability was attributable to the variation of the 5-year ICE. At the trial-level, treatment effects for the different ICEs and OS were strongly correlated, with the highest correlation for RFS and DRFS and the lowest for BCFI.

Interpretation

Our results provide evidence supporting the use of DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, and IBCFS as primary endpoint in breast cancer adjuvant trials.

Funding

This analysis was supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research ("Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro", AIRC; IG 2017/20760) and by Italian Ministry of Health-5 × 1000 funds (years 2021-2022).

Choosing the appropriate pharmacotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy: what needs to be considered?

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy. Breast cancer during pregnancy is a challenging clinical condition requiring proper and timely multidisciplinary management.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy with a focus about the current state-of-the-art on the feasibility and safety of pharmacotherapy approaches in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Multidisciplinary care is key for a proper diagnostic-therapeutic management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Engaging patients and their caregivers in the decision-making process is essential and psychological support should be provided. The treatment of patients with breast cancer during pregnancy should follow the same recommendations as those for breast cancer in young women outside pregnancy but taking into account the gestational age at the time of treatment.Anthracycline-, cyclophosphamide-, and taxane-based regimens can be safely administered during the second and third trimesters with standard protocols, preferring weekly regimens whenever possible. Endocrine therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents are contraindicated throughout pregnancy, also due to the very limited data available to guide their administration in this setting. During treatment, careful fetal growth monitoring is mandatory, and even after delivery proper health monitoring for the children exposed in utero to chemotherapy should be continued.

SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529)-related COVID-19 sequelae in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer: results from the OnCovid registry

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 sequelae can affect about 15% of patients with cancer who survive the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and can substantially impair their survival and continuity of oncological care. We aimed to investigate whether previous immunisation affects long-term sequelae in the context of evolving variants of concern of SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

OnCovid is an active registry that includes patients aged 18 years or older from 37 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and a history of solid or haematological malignancy, either active or in remission, followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death. We evaluated the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae in patients who survived COVID-19 and underwent a formal clinical reassessment, categorising infection according to the date of diagnosis as the omicron (B.1.1.529) phase from Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022; the alpha (B.1.1.7)-delta (B.1.617.2) phase from Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021; and the pre-vaccination phase from Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020. The prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae was compared according to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation status and in relation to post-COVID-19 survival and resumption of systemic anticancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974.

FINDINGS

At the follow-up update on June 20, 2022, 1909 eligible patients, evaluated after a median of 39 days (IQR 24-68) from COVID-19 diagnosis, were included (964 [50·7%] of 1902 patients with sex data were female and 938 [49·3%] were male). Overall, 317 (16·6%; 95% CI 14·8-18·5) of 1909 patients had at least one sequela from COVID-19 at the first oncological reassessment. The prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae was highest in the pre-vaccination phase (191 [19·1%; 95% CI 16·4-22·0] of 1000 patients). The prevalence was similar in the alpha-delta phase (110 [16·8%; 13·8-20·3] of 653 patients, p=0·24), but significantly lower in the omicron phase (16 [6·2%; 3·5-10·2] of 256 patients, p<0·0001). In the alpha-delta phase, 84 (18·3%; 95% CI 14·6-22·7) of 458 unvaccinated patients and three (9·4%; 1·9-27·3) of 32 unvaccinated patients in the omicron phase had sequelae. Patients who received a booster and those who received two vaccine doses had a significantly lower prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae than unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (ten [7·4%; 95% CI 3·5-13·5] of 136 boosted patients, 18 [9·8%; 5·8-15·5] of 183 patients who had two vaccine doses vs 277 [18·5%; 16·5-20·9] of 1489 unvaccinated patients, p=0·0001), respiratory sequelae (six [4·4%; 1·6-9·6], 11 [6·0%; 3·0-10·7] vs 148 [9·9%; 8·4-11·6], p=0·030), and prolonged fatigue (three [2·2%; 0·1-6·4], ten [5·4%; 2·6-10·0] vs 115 [7·7%; 6·3-9·3], p=0·037).

INTERPRETATION

Unvaccinated patients with cancer remain highly vulnerable to COVID-19 sequelae irrespective of viral strain. This study confirms the role of previous SARS-CoV-2 immunisation as an effective measure to protect patients from COVID-19 sequelae, disruption of therapy, and ensuing mortality.

FUNDING

UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust.

The evolving scenario of cancer care provision across the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past 2 years, the COVID-19 pandemic has had short-term and long-term effects on the delivery of cancer care. Some European countries faced an unprecedented widespread crisis during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, only being able afterwards to gradually recover, thanks to the improvement in preventive measures, changes in public health and reactive processes in cancer care and a better understanding of the ongoing heath emergency.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and COVID-19 specific treatments, the growing testing and tracking capability to limit virus diffusion, and research efforts to better define areas of action have all greatly limited the negative impact of the health emergency on routine cancer care.The need to protect those more vulnerable and to ensure continuity of care for oncology patients has been balanced across the pandemic, with the aim to guarantee an optimal standard of care.

SUMMARY

This article aims to provide an overview on the evolving scenario of cancer care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, focusing on the particular features that characterized the pandemic course as well as the main differences that were observed across it.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 protects from morbidity, mortality and sequelae from COVID19 in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccines immunogenicity in patients with cancer has been investigated, whether they can significantly improve the severity of COVID-19 in this specific population is undefined.

METHODS

Capitalizing on OnCovid (NCT04393974) registry data we reported COVID-19 mortality and proxies of COVID-19 morbidity, including post-COVID-19 outcomes, according to the vaccination status of the included patients.

RESULTS

2090 eligible patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 02/2020 and 11/2021 were included, of whom 1930 (92.3%) unvaccinated, 91 (4.4%) fully vaccinated and 69 (3.3%) partially vaccinated. With the exception of a higher prevalence of patients from the UK (p = 0.0003) and receiving systemic anticancer therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis (p = 0.0082) among fully vaccinated patients, no demographics/oncological features were associated with vaccination status. The 14-days case fatality rate (CFR) (5.5% vs 20.7%, p = 0.0004) and the 28-days CFR (13.2% vs 27.4%, p = 0.0028) demonstrated a significant improvement for fully vaccinated patients in comparison with unvaccinated patients. The receipt of prior full vaccination was also associated with reduced symptomatic COVID-19 (79.1% vs 88.5%, p = 0.0070), need of COVID-19 oriented therapy (34.9% vs 63.2%, p < 0.0001), complications from COVID-19 (28.6% vs 39.4%, p = 0.0379), hospitalizations due to COVID-19 (42.2% vs 52.5%, p = 0.0007) and oxygen therapy requirement (35.7% vs 52%, p = 0.0036). Following Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) procedure no statistically significant difference according to the vaccination status was confirmed; however, all COVID-19 related outcomes were concordantly in favour of full vaccination. Among the 1228 (58.8%) patients who underwent a formal reassessment at participating centres after COVID-19 resolution, fully vaccinated patients experienced less sequelae than unvaccinated patients (6.7% vs 17.2%, p = 0.0320).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides initial evidence in support of the beneficial effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer.

Outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant outbreak among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer in Europe: results from the retrospective, multicentre, OnCovid registry study

BACKGROUND

The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible and escapes vaccine-induced immunity. We aimed to describe outcomes due to COVID-19 during the omicron outbreak compared with the prevaccination period and alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) waves in patients with cancer in Europe.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of the multicentre OnCovid Registry study, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, who had a history of solid or haematological malignancy that was either active or in remission. Patient were recruited from 37 oncology centres from UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany. Participants were followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death or loss to follow-up, while being treated as per standard of care. For this analysis, we excluded data from centres that did not actively enter new data after March 1, 2021 (in France, Germany, and Belgium). We compared measures of COVID-19 morbidity, which were complications from COVID-19, hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and requirement of supplemental oxygen and COVID-19-specific therapies, and COVID-19 mortality across three time periods designated as the prevaccination (Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020), alpha-delta (Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021), and omicron (Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022) phases. We assessed all-cause case-fatality rates at 14 days and 28 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 overall and in unvaccinated and fully vaccinated patients and in those who received a booster dose, after adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour type, stage, and status, and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

As of Feb 4, 2022 (database lock), the registry included 3820 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 between Feb 27, 2020, and Jan 31, 2022. 3473 patients were eligible for inclusion (1640 [47·4%] were women and 1822 [52·6%] were men, with a median age of 68 years [IQR 57-77]). 2033 (58·5%) of 3473 were diagnosed during the prevaccination phase, 1075 (31·0%) during the alpha-delta phase, and 365 (10·5%) during the omicron phase. Among patients diagnosed during the omicron phase, 113 (33·3%) of 339 were fully vaccinated and 165 (48·7%) were boosted, whereas among those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase, 152 (16·6%) of 915 were fully vaccinated and 21 (2·3%) were boosted. Compared with patients diagnosed during the prevaccination period, those who were diagnosed during the omicron phase had lower case-fatality rates at 14 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·32 [95% CI 0·19-0·61) and 28 days (0·34 [0·16-0·79]), complications due to COVID-19 (0·26 [0·17-0·46]), and hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (0·17 [0·09-0·32]), and had less requirements for COVID-19-specific therapy (0·22 [0·15-0·34]) and oxygen therapy (0·24 [0·14-0·43]) than did those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. Unvaccinated patients diagnosed during the omicron phase had similar crude case-fatality rates at 14 days (ten [25%] of 40 patients vs 114 [17%] of 656) and at 28 days (11 [27%] of 40 vs 184 [28%] of 656) and similar rates of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (18 [43%] of 42 vs 266 [41%] of 652) and complications from COVID-19 (13 [31%] of 42 vs 237 [36%] of 659) as those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase.

INTERPRETATION

Despite time-dependent improvements in outcomes reported in the omicron phase compared with the earlier phases of the pandemic, patients with cancer remain highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 if they are not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Our findings support universal vaccination of patients with cancer as a protective measure against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust.

Clinical assessment of the Omicron outbreak in Europe and trends in morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 and cancer

e18673

Background: Whilst patients (pts) with cancer are at increased risk of adverse outcome from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no evidence exists as to the natural history of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant in this population. Methods: Capitalizing on OnCovid study data (NCT04393974), a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with cancer and COVID-19, we analysed COVID-19 morbidity and case fatality rates at 14 days (CFR14) across 3 phases defined following the evolution of the pandemic in Europe, according to date of COVID-19 diagnosis: “Pre-vaccination” phase (27/02/2020-30/11/2020), “Alpha-Delta variant” phase (01/12/2020-14/12/2021), “Omicron variant” phase (15/12/2020-31/01/2022). Results: By the data lock of 04/02/2022, 3820 consecutive pts were enrolled, 3473 of whom were eligible for this analysis. Among them, 2033 (58.6%), 1075 (30.9%) and 365 (10.5%) were diagnosed during the Pre-vaccination, Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases. Pts diagnosed in the Omicron phase were more likely aged < 65 years (48.6% vs 42.5%, 39.4% p = 0.01), had < 2 comorbidities (61.9% vs 55.6%, 52.1% p = 0.01). They had more advanced-stage tumours (62.1% vs 53.3%, 49.0%, p < 0.01) and were more likely receiving systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at COVID-19 diagnosis (54.9% vs 43.9%, 39.6%, p < 0.01). Proportions of fully vaccinated/boosted pts were higher in the Omicron phase (33.9%-48.1%) compared to the Alpha-Delta phase (16.6%-2.3%, p < 0.01). Pts diagnosed in the Omicron phase had improved CFR14 (9.0% vs 13.9%, 23.1%, p < 0.01) lower hospitalization rates due to COVID-19 (24.4% vs 41.4%, 56.6%, p < 0.01), lower complications rates (15.3% vs 33.6%, 39.4%, p < 0.01) and reduced need for COVID-19 specific therapy (22.4% vs 43.0%, 65.7% p < 0.01) compared to the Alpha-Delta and pre-vaccinal phase. After adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour stage, status and receipt of SACT at COVID-19, patients diagnosed in the Omicron phase displayed the lowest risk of death at 14 days compared to earlier phases. Similarly, rates of hospitalization and complicated COVID-19 were lowest for Omicron phase. Conclusions: This is the first study to portray the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak in Europe, documenting an improvement in all COVID-19 outcomes compared to earlier phases of the pandemic. Enhanced healthcare capacity, improved disease management, immunization campaigns alongside differential virulence of viral strains are likely contributing to improved outcomes across phases.[Table: see text]

Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

Of 6,462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8,093,401 women from the general population and 112,840 patients with BC of whom 7,505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan.

Comparing the Gonadotoxicity of Multiple Breast Cancer Regimens: Important Understanding for Managing Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal Women

Over the last several decades, improvements in breast cancer treatment have contributed to increased cure rates for women diagnosed with this malignancy. Consequently, great importance should be paid to the long-term side effects of systemic therapies. For young women (defined as per guideline ≤40 years at diagnosis) who undergo chemotherapy, one of the most impactful side effects on their quality of life is premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) leading to fertility-related problems and the side effects of early menopause. Regimens, type, and doses of chemotherapy, as well as the age of patients and their ovarian reserve at the time of treatment are major risk factors for treatment-induced POI. For these reasons, childbearing desire and preservation of ovarian function and/or fertility should be discussed with all premenopausal patients before planning the treatments. This manuscript summarizes the available fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients, the risk of treatment-induced POI with different anticancer treatments, and the possible procedures to prevent it. A special focus is paid to the role of oncofertility counseling, as a central part of the visit in this setting, during which the patient should receive all the information about the potential consequences of the disease and of the proposed treatment on her future life.

Evidence-based approaches for the management of side-effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer

The growing availability of more effective therapies has contributed to an increased survival of patients with breast cancer. In hormone receptor-positive early disease, increased survival is strongly correlated with the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but this therapy can cause side-effects that have major consequences in terms of treatment adherence and patients' quality of life. In premenopausal breast cancer survivors, these side-effects might be even more prominent due to the abrupt suppression of oestrogen associated with the most intense endocrine therapies. An important ambition of cancer care in the 21st century is to recover pre-cancer quality of life and emotional and social functions, which is only possible through the mitigation of the side-effects of anticancer treatments. This Review presents a comprehensive summary of the efficacy and safety data of the available interventions (hormonal and non-hormonal pharmacological strategies, non-pharmacological approaches, and complementary and alternative medicine) to control selected side-effects associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, musculoskeletal symptoms, and fatigue), providing updated, evidence-based approaches for their management.

Gender-specific aspects related to type of fertility preservation strategies and access to fertility care

Survivorship is an area of paramount importance to be addressed as early as possible after cancer diagnosis by all health care providers. On this regard, cancer care in young patients often poses several age-related considerations among which fertility and pregnancy-related issues have a crucial role. According to the available guidelines on the topic, all patients with cancer diagnosed during their reproductive years should be provided a proper oncofertility counselling before starting anticancer treatments. This is an important step in order to inform patients about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity and the available strategies for fertility preservation so that they can be referred as early as possible to fertility specialists if potentially interested in these options.In this manuscript, we aim to provide an up to date overview on the available efficacy and safety data with the main strategies for fertility preservation in male and female cancer patients in order to help optimising the oncofertility counselling performed by healthcare providers involved in cancer care and dealing with young patients. In male patients with cancer, sperm cryopreservation is the standard technique for fertility preservation. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and temporary ovarian suppression with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy are the main options in female patients with cancer.A multidisciplinary management building a strong network between fertility and oncology/haematology units is crucial to properly address fertility care in all young patients with cancer, at both diagnosis and during oncologic follow-up. Discussing fertility and pregnancy-related issues with young patients with cancer has to be considered mandatory nowadays keeping in mind that returning to a normal life (including the possibility to have a family and to live with as few side effects as possible) should be considered an important ambition in cancer care in the 21st century .

Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients

The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.

Current State of the Art in the Adjuvant Systemic Treatment of Premenopausal Patients With Early Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy diagnosed in premenopausal women. In this age group, breast tumors tend to be diagnosed at more advanced stages and to harbor more aggressive biological features. In addition, specific age-related issues including genetic counseling, fertility preservation, impact on social and couple relationships, working life, and management of long-term side effects should be considered highly relevant when managing early breast cancer in premenopausal women. Therefore, the care of these patients is particularly complex and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. The present review summarizes the current state of art in the adjuvant systemic treatment of premenopausal women with early breast cancer focusing on the optimal chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy approaches in this specific patient population.

Overexpression of Periostin in Tumor Biopsy Samples Is Associated With Prostate Cancer Phenotype and Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Overexpression of periostin (POSTN) is associated with prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. We investigated the prognostic significance of POSTN expression in tumor biopsy samples of patients with PCa.

METHODS

We scored POSTN expression by immunohistochemistry analysis on 215 PCa biopsy samples using an anti-POSTN-specific antibody. A total immunoreactive score (T-IRS) was calculated by adding the POSTN staining scores of stromal and epithelial tumor cells. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression/recurrence-free survival (PFS), radiographic progression/recurrence-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were the study end points.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients received therapy with radical attempt, whereas 72 had locally advanced or metastatic disease and received hormone therapy alone. Median T-IRS was 9 and 12 (range, 0-20), respectively (P = .001). Overall, we found a weak positive correlation of T-IRS with prebiopsy PSA levels (r = 0.166, P = .016) and Gleason score (r = 0.266, P < .000). T-IRS ≥ 8 independently predicted for shorter PSA-PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] ≥ 8 versus < 8: 1.50 [1.06-2.14], P = .024 and 1.92 [1.20-3.07], P = .007, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, the association between T-IRS and patient outcome was retained in patients who received therapy with radical attempt (HR [95% CI] ≥ 8 vs. < 8: rPFS: 2.06 [1.18-3.58], P = .01; OS: 2.36 [1.24-4.50], P = .009) and in those with low to intermediate Gleason scores (HR [95% CI] ≥ 8 vs. < 8: PSA-PFS: 1.65 [1.06-2.59], P = .028; rPFS: 2.09 [1.14-3.87], P = .018; OS: 2.57 [1.31-5.04], P = .006).

CONCLUSION

POSTN T-IRS on PCa biopsy samples independently predicted the risk of recurrence, progression, and death in patients with localized disease and in those with low to intermediate Gleason scores.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of LHRH agonists in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in Italy

OBJECTIVES

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists represent one of the main cost factors in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We compared the cost-effectiveness of the five different 3-month formulations of LHRH agonists currently available for advanced prostate cancer in Italy, because these differ both in their capacity to suppress testosterone and in their acquisition costs.

METHODS

A probabilistic, patient-level simulation model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (INHS), of leuprorelin 11.25 mg and 22.5 mg, triptorelin 11.25 mg, buserelin 9.9 mg, and goserelin 10.8 mg. The model incorporated testosterone-dependent progression-free and cancer-specific survival functions, LHRH agonist effectiveness data, and national costs and tariffs. Cox's proportional hazard models were used to compute total and progression-free survival functions based on clinical data from 129 patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated in an Italian center. Bayesian random effects models were employed to summarize evidence from published literature on testosterone suppression obtained with the available LHRH agonists.

RESULTS

Estimated total survival was ≈5 years, with a maximum difference between treatment options of ≈2 months. There was a mean difference of almost €2,500 in lifetime total costs between the least costly option (leuprorelin 22.5 mg) and the most expensive (goserelin). In the incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, leuprorelin 22.5 mg dominated all alternatives except buserelin, which had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus leuprorelin 22.5 mg of ≈€12,000 per life-month gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on modelling with meta-analysis of comparative survival data, leuprorelin 22.5 mg was the most cost-effective treatment of the available depot formulation LHRH agonists.

Mechanism of microwave thermotherapy

Possible mechanisms by which transurethral microwave thermotherapy creates an improvement in vodiing parameters are reviewed. The therapy creates coagulation necrosis in the hyperplastic adenoma, and thus has the potential to create volume reduction, change in the periurethral tissue, and changes in efferent neuromuscular elements and sensory neural elements. Evidence is presented that suggests that several of these mechanisms are likely important, and there is not a singular mechanism of action.

EAU Guidelines on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

OBJECTIVE

To establish guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of BPH.

METHODS

A search of published work was conducted using Medline. In combination with expert opinions recommendations were made on the usefulness of tests for assessment and follow-up: mandatory, recommended, or optional. In addition, indications and outcomes for the different therapeutic options were reviewed.

RESULTS

A digital rectal examination is mandatory in the assessment for the diagnosis of BPH. Recommended tests are the International Prostate Symptom Score, creatinine measurement (or renal ultrasound), uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine volume. All other tests are optional. The aim of treatment is to improve patients' quality of life, and it depends on the severity of the symptoms of BPH. The watchful waiting policy is recommended for patients with mild symptoms, medical treatment for patients with mild-moderate symptoms, and surgery for patients who failed medication or conservative management and who have moderate-severe symptoms, and/or complications of BPH which require surgery. Regarding non-surgical treatments, transurethral microwave thermotherapy is the most attractive option. These treatments should be reserved for patients who prefer to avoid surgery or who no longer respond favourably to medication. Finally, recommendations for follow-up tests and a recommended follow-up time schedule after BPH treatment are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for assessment, possible therapeutic options, and follow-up of patients with BPH are made.

Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate vs. transurethral resection. Results of a multicentric, randomized clinical study on 150 patients

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate clinical, urodynamic efficacy and safety of TURP and TVP in patients with symptoms due to obstructive benign prostatic hypertrophy with a prospective multicentric randomized study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

150 patients with BPH, urodynamically obstructed, were randomized to receive TURP or TVP. At the end of the recruitment phase, 80 patients underwent TURP and 70 patients underwent TVP. Patients were clinically evaluated by the I-PSS score at months 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12. Preoperative evaluation included complete blood routine examination, PSA, transrectal ultrasound and pressure/flow studies. Pressure/flow studies were also performed after 3 months.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between groups in any of the preoperative parameters. All patients were considered urodynamically obstructed at preoperative pressure studies. As for catheter days and hospitalization days, statistical differences between TVP and TURP were found; catheter days were 2.71 days (SE 0.12) in the TURP group vs. 1.9 (SE 0.24) in the TVP group (p < 0.000). Hospitalization was 4.7 days (SE 0.22) after TURP and 3.9 days (SE 0.24) after TVP (p < 0.000). Mean preoperative I-PSS score was 18.84 and 18.19 in the TVP and TURP groups, respectively. At 3, 6 and 12 months, IPSS was 5.52 and 5.50, 3.77 and 4.94, 3.52 and 4.04 for TURP and TVP, respectively. Mean preoperative peak flow rate (PFR) was 8.78 and 7.26 ml/s for TURP and TVP, respectively; after 3, 6 and 12 months, PFR was 19.21 and 18.8, 20.77 and 20.13, 20.30 and 20.31 ml/s, respectively. After 3 months, 6 patients in the TURP group (7.5%) and 7 patients in the TVP group (10%) were borderline obstructed. 1 patient in the TVP group (1.4%) was still obstructed and underwent TURP. As for complications, 4 patients (5.7%) in the TVP group had stress urinary incontinence after 12 months vs. 1 (1.25%) in the TURP group.

DISCUSSION

The present study clearly demonstrates that TVP is as effective as TURP in relieving urinary obstruction due to BPH, it offers some advantages in terms of catheterization and hospital stay, but at the price of a higher incidence of postoperative urine incontinence. Technical improvements might solve this problem in the future, perhaps combining TVP with TURP of the apical tissue.

Clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen and Gleason grade to predict extracapsular disease or nodal metastasis in men with newly diagnosed, previously untreated prostate cancer. A multicenter study. A. Ur. O. Cooperative Group

OBJECTIVE

To draw nomograms for preoperative predictions of extracapsular and of nodal disease based upon preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade and clinical stage.

METHODS

The complete charts of 1,738 patients submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy in 34 Italian urological departments have been reviewed. The correlation between preoperative variables and pathological examination was tested by both univariate and multivariate techniques. Logistic regression analysis with the likelihood ratio chi 2 test was used to predict the pathological features (T > = 3; N+) of a patient for various combinations of preoperative variables.

RESULTS

Probability plots were constructed for the prediction of either extracapsular disease or lymph node involvement by the above-mentioned combination of preoperative variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained probability curves could be useful for patient counselling, for planning a staging laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in high-risk patients and for deciding whether to perform a nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

Lithotripsy with miniscope: Clinical results of 193 consecutive patients

A retrospective analysis was carried out on 193 patients who underwent ureteroscopy for ureteral stones with a miniscope associated with either an electrohydraulic or a pneumatic lithotriptor. Complete stone fragmentation with spontaneous expulsion of the fragments occurred with just one session in 89.1% of cases. Nine patients underwent ureterolithotomy. The only complications were 3 ureteral lesions without perforation. The authors consider that with these mini instruments, there is a very low rate of morbidity connected with this procedure, which can therefore be given first option in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.

Retroperitoneoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE

To demonstrate feasibility and safety of retroperitoneoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

11 patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction were selected for retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty. Operative time ranged between 2 h 30 min and 4 h (mean 3 h 10 min); in 5 cases we had to convert to open surgery and an open pyeloplasty was performed through a minimal (6 cm) lombotomic incision.

RESULTS

Follow-up IVPs were performed in all patients approximately 2-3 weeks after stent removal. In all patients, a reduction in the grade of hydronephrosis was observed. Significant improvement was noticed in 9 patients; in 2 patients a moderate improvement was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with retroperitoneoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction demonstrates that also with this approach it is possible to perform reconstructive procedures, with minimal complications. Technical refinements will progressively reduce the conversion rate to open surgery, even if done through minilaparotomy.

Laparoscopic tumorectomy for renal cell carcinoma in a HIV-positive patient

We report on a HIV-positive patient in whom laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery has been performed. A 47-year-old white male referred for evaluation and treatment of an asymptomatic, serendipitously discovered renal mass. The patient underwent a laparoscopic tumorectomy; indications, surgical technique and rationale are described in detail.

Results of rebiopsy for suspected prostate cancer in symptomatic men with elevated PSA levels

AIM OF THE STUDY

To develop indications for repeat biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer and first negative biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

148 consecutive patients, submitted to two or more biopsies for suspected prostate cancer, were extracted from our database on prostatic diseases. Patients were stratified according to the results of the last biopsy (benign or carcinoma) considering the results of the first and of the last biopsy when more than two biopsies had been performed. PSA velocity was calculated when the interval between PSA obtained before the initial and the final biopsy was at least 6 months; PSA velocities were annualized and absolute changes between the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Prostatic carcinoma was detected in 60 of the 148 patients (40.5%), including 19 of 41 (46.4%) with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and 45 of 107 (42.1%) with normal tissue or prostatic epithelial atrophia on initial biopsy. 20% of patients (4 of 20) with low-grade PIN and 71.1% (15 of 21) with high-grade PIN had cancer at repeat biopsy. The mean PSA value of patients with carcinoma on the repeat biopsy was higher than that of patients without carcinoma (13.3 vs. 10.7 ng/ml). However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.37). Mean PSA velocity increased for patients with a final diagnosis of carcinoma versus those without evidence of carcinoma (+0.3 vs. +1.4 ng/ml/year); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

According to these results, patients with either PIN II-III, or high PSA and PIN I on initial biopsy, and/or with elevated PSA velocity (more than 1 ng/ml/year) should undergo repeat prostate needle biopsy, being at high risk of prostate carcinoma.

Videoendoscopic retroperitoneal cutaneous ureterostomy

Since January 1993, 10 patients with bilateral ureteral obstruction due to advanced pelvic cancers underwent videoendosurgical cutaneous ureterostomy. Five patients had prostate cancer, three had uterine cancer, and only two had bladder cancer. In five cases a bilateral laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure (LCU) was performed. In five cases a retroperitoneal laparoscopic technique (RLCU) was adopted, and only in one out of these five cases was the procedure done bilaterally. All the procedures were done under general anesthesia. The procedure was accomplished in all the cases without any intraoperative complication. Monolateral retroperitoneal laparoscopic cutaneous ureterostomy (RLCU) required 35-42 min, including the dilation time. Bilateral RLCU required extra time for changing the position of the patient. Postoperative pain was rather insignificant and did not require additional medication. Postdiversion hospital stay was 3-6 days depending on the general condition of the patient. The mean follow-up was 14.4 months.

Prostatic Biopsy

The aim of this paper is to review the different possibilities of performing biopsies on the prostate and to discuss indications, complications and the instruments to be used. Comments are then made on the results of an interactive discussion, mainly focussing on when a prostate biopsy should be performed and by whom, a urologist or radiologist. The Authors suggest 2 algorithms which can be useful in clinical practice to decide whether or not to perform a biopsy.

Procollagen type I carboxyterminal extension peptide in serum: a reliable marker of bone metastatic disease in newly diagnosed prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the accuracy of type I procollagen, a bone matrix glycoprotein, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as markers for predicting the results of radionuclide bone scan in newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS

74 patients underwent serum PSA and procollagen determination using specific antibodies. A staging radionuclide bone scan was then performed; patients with positive bone scan were submitted to x-rays of the suspicious zones. Then, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of procollagen and PSA in the detection of bone metastases.

RESULTS

Procollagen alone had 83.3% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 90.9% positive predictive value, 92.3% negative predictive value and 91.9% overall accuracy. PSA alone had 70.1% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 70.8% positive predictive value, 86% negative predictive value and 81.1% overall accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, we no longer perform a staging radionuclide bone scan in patients with PSA < 20 ng/ml and normal procollagen level, diminishing the number of radionuclide bone scans and increasing the overall net savings for the health care system.

Heat-expansible permanent intraurethral stents for benign prostatic hyperplasia and urethral strictures

We report our experience with the insertion of a new thermoexpansible permanent intraurethral stent, the Memotherm. We treated 49 patients, 25 with benign prostic hyperplasia (BPH), 21 with recurrent urethral strictures (2 cervicourethral and 18 bulbar and 1 of a vescicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy), and 3 with sphincterotomies (2 for dyssynergia and 1 with incontinence plus stenosis). The patients' ages ranged from 24 to 84 (mean 59.7) years. In all patients, stent insertion was achieved without any operative problem. In two patients, stents were removed (one in the BPH group and one in the urethral stricture group), and at long-term follow-up, we have seen two patients with severe mucosal hyperplasia.

Evaluation of cervico-urethral obstruction with ambulatory pressure/flow studies: an alternative to conventional pressure/flow studies?

Most of the urodynamic studies are conducted in the laboratory during a brief recording time and under nonphysiological conditions and, thus, may fail to unfold the nature of existing pathological conditions of the lower urinary tract; false positives and false negatives are possible. To overcome some of the difficulties associated with conventional P/F studies we have developed, with the cooperation of Medical Measurement System company, Entschede, The Netherlands, a portable system (UDS 2000) for ambulatory monitoring of intravesical pressure, abdominal pressure and EMG connectable with a weight-transducer flowmeter that allows to perform Holter P/F measurements. We compared the results obtained with conventional P/F studies and with Holter P/F studies in 58 BPH patients. During the filling phase we observed a slightly increased number of stable detrusors with Holter P/F recording (46 vs 42); conversely, the number of patients suffering from urge incontinence was the same (7 pts). During the voiding phase, out of 45 patients considered obstructed at conventional P/F study, only 42 were really urodynamically obstructed (93.3%), while other 3 patients had bordeline obstruction. 4 patients with bordeline obstruction at conventional P/F study were considered non-obstructed after Holter P/F. In conclusion, Holter P/F proved to be reliable in the assessment of bladder function during storage and emptying in BPH patients and to be more specific in defining outlet obstruction than the conventional study because of the physiologic filling, the reduction of urethral irritation, the lack of a urethral catheter either during filling or voiding, and the reduction of emotional stress.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Benefits and complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for detection of stage D1 prostate cancer: a multicenter experience

One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were submitted to staging laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPL) at 5 cooperative centers with one or more of the following conditions which were considered as risk factors for nodal disease: clinical stage C (or T3) disease, serum prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/ml, Gleason sum > 6. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 11 (range 2-29). Metastases from prostate cancer were found in 41 patients (25.9%). The proportion of lymph node-positive patients increases significantly with the presence of one, two or three of the conditions considered as risk factors (p < 0.00005). The benefit of LPL is limited to the lymph node-positive patients who can be spared a second operation.

Videoendoscopic cutaneous ureterostomy for palliative urinary diversion in advanced pelvic cancer

Since January 1993, 9 patients with bilateral ureteral obstruction due to advanced pelvic cancers underwent videoendosurgical cutaneous ureterostomy. Five patients had prostate cancer, 3 had uterine cancer and only 1 bladder cancer. In 5 cases a bilateral laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure was performed. In 4 cases a retroperitoneal laparoscopic technique was adopted and only in 1 out of these 4 cases the procedure was done bilaterally. All the procedures were done under general anesthesia. The procedure was accomplished in all the cases without any intraoperative complication; the operative time ranged between 35 and 130 min. Postoperative pain was rather insignificant and did not require additional medication. Postdiversion hospital stay ranged from 3 to 11 days according to the general condition of the patients. The mean follow-up is 10.8 months. In conclusion, retroperitoneal laparoscopic cutaneous ureterostomy seems to be a reasonable alternative to percutaneous nephrostomy in case of bilateral ureteral obstruction due to advanced prostate or uterine cancer, provided that the clinical condition of the patient allows general anesthesia.

Laparoscopically assisted transvaginal radical cystectomy

Herein we describe 5 cases of anterior pelvic exenteration in females through a combined transvaginal and laparoscopic approach for bladder cancer. In 4 cases hysterectomy and bilateral ovariectomy were performed. As far as urinary diversion is concerned, a bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy was performed in the 1st case, and in the remaining 4 an ileal conduit was accomplished through a minilaparotomy at the stoma site. The surgical specimen was withdrawn 'en bloc' transvaginally in all cases except 1, in whom vaginal atrophy forced us to perform a midline minilaparotomy. Total operative time ranged between 6 and 9 h, and 4 patients were discharged after 7-11 days with no complications. One patient was discharged only after 18 days due to obesity and diabetic problems. A larger series is needed to confirm the advantages of the combined transvaginal and videolaparoscopic approach for anterior pelvic exenteration as compared to the conventional procedure, with special regard given to the oncological outcome. Our initial experience is surely encouraging.

Laparoscopic bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy for palliation of ureteral obstruction caused by advanced pelvic cancer

In cases of advanced urologic malignancies with impairment of renal function secondary to tumor infiltration in high-risk patients, the possibility of performing a laparoscopic instead of an open cutaneous ureterostomy should be considered. We performed laparoscopic cutaneous ureterostomy in three male patients, two with prostate cancer and one with bladder cancer, and in one female patient with uterine cancer. Five operative ports were used. The ureters were identified, dissected, severed, and passed through two 10-mm ports; and cutaneous ureterostomies were performed in the usual manner. The mean operative time was 96 minutes. Patients were discharged after 5 to 7 (mean 6) days. The two patients with prostate cancer are now in treatment with GnRH analogues with a follow-up of 3 and 7 months. The patient with bladder cancer underwent palliative radiotherapy and is well after 6 months. The patient with uterine cancer has stable disease after 3 months. Laparoscopic urinary diversion causes less discomfort and has a low complication rate and may be the first-choice diversion in patients with advanced cancer who have a life expectancy longer than 6 months.

Evaluation of cervico-urethral obstruction with ambulatory pressure/flow studies: an alternative to conventional pressure/flow studies?

Most of the urodynamic studies are conducted in the laboratory during a brief recording time and under nonphysiological conditions and, thus, may fail to unfold the nature of existing pathological conditions of the lower urinary tract; false positives and false negatives are possible. To overcome some of the difficulties associated with conventional P/F studies we have developed, with the cooperation of Medical Measurement System company, Entschede, The Netherlands, a portable system (UDS 2000) for ambulatory monitoring of intravesical pressure, abdominal pressure and EMG connectable with a weight transducer flowmeter that permits performing Holter P/F measurements. We compared the results obtained with conventional P/F studies and with the Holter P/F studies in 58 BPH patients. During the filling phase we observed a slightly increased number of stable detrusors with Holter P/F recording (46 vs 42); conversely, the number of patients suffering from urge incontinence was the same (7 pts). During the voiding phase, out of 45 patients considered obstructed at conventional P/F study, only 42 were really urodynamically obstructed (93.3%), while 3 other patients had borderline obstruction. Four patients with borderline obstruction at conventional P/F study were considered nonobstructed after Holter P/F.

Prostate cancer detection in BPH patients

The first problem to be solved in the evaluation of BPH patients is surely the differential diagnosis with prostate carcinoma. We evaluated the impact of a combined approach for prostate cancer detection using DRE, PSA, TRUS and ultrasound-guided biopsy, determining the sensitivity and specificity of different tools, in order to obtain a diagnostic algorithm to be used for pretreatment differential diagnosis between prostate cancer and BPH.

Laparoscopic pelvic lymphnodes dissection for prostate and bladder cancer: indication, techniques and results

Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy has been proposed for staging of prostate cancer and it might be used, in selected cases, also in bladder cancer. On a total of 31 laparoscopic lymphadenectomies (LPND), 18 for prostate cancer and 13 for bladder cancer, we found positive nodes in 8 cases (26.1%), 4 in prostate and 4 in bladder cancer group. We had no intraoperative complications and negligible postoperative complications (in 10% of cases shoulder-tip pain and in 24% subcutaneous emphysema); all these spontaneously disappeared after 24-36 hours. Patients with negative nodes underwent radical surgery except two prostate cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy, and patients with positive nodes underwent hormonal therapy (for prostate cancer) or chemoradiotherapy protocol (for bladder cancer). In conclusion, laparoscopic lymphadenectomy proved to be a feasible and safe method for staging urological malignancies, being less invasive, with shorter hospitalization and postoperative convalescence than open lymphadenectomy. It should be mainly indicated in high risk prostate cancer patients (elevated PSA and/or Gleason score). In bladder cancer patients, it could be proposed in bladder sparing investigational protocols, as the percentage of pelvic nodes metastases in T2/T3 bladder cancer is sufficiently high to justify an additional staging procedure.

Does transurethral thermotherapy induce a long-term alpha blockade? An immunohistochemical study

10 patients underwent transurethral thermotherapy and after few days were submitted to open prostatectomy. The surgical specimens were compared to those of 2 other patients used as controls. Pathological specimens were evaluated using histological and immunohistochemical stains. Microscopic examination showed a well-preserved urethra and microabscesses, epithelial necrosis and vasculitis in the prostatic tissue at a depth of 0.5-2 cm from the urethral lumen. Immunohistochemical stains showed the damage and disappearance of nervous fibers.

Ureteroarterial fistula: a case report

Ureteroarterial fistulas are rare, with less than 20 well documented cases reported. We report a case of a fistula between the left external iliac artery and the left ureter in a patient who underwent a previous operation for bladder cancer. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in these rare but high risk patients are discussed.

Malignant priapism due to a huge renal carcinoma

Metastases to the penis from renal cell carcinoma producing priapism are very rare, as only 18 cases have been described since 1964. We present an additional case of priapism due to massive metastatic involvement of the corpora cavernosa in a patient with huge renal cell carcinoma, 28 cm in diameter, discussing the possible pathogenetic mechanism of such a rare condition.

Comparison between digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound in symptomatic patients. Results on 141 cases

In this study we proposed to verify sensitivity and specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in patients who referred at our institution for prostatic complaints. 141 patients, ages ranging between 55 and 86 years (mean 67.5), underwent DRE, blood PSA, TRUS and ultrasonically guided biopsy of the prostate. The comparison of the results obtained with the different diagnostic tools allowed us to draw a diagnostic algorithm for prostate cancer in symptomatic patients.

[Exploration of the intra-renal collecting system using flexible fibroscopy]

23 cases of flexible retrograde nephroscopy system for undiagnosed hematuria or filling defect are reviewed. The introduction was carried out by combining hydraulic dilation, rigid ureterorenoscopy and a working sheath. The indications were merely diagnostic (filling defects and/or haematuria). The success rate was very high (22 of 23). 9 cases of papillary tumors, 4 cases of small radiolucent stones and 1 case of papillary necrosis were diagnosed. In 8 cases no pathology was found. The complication rate was extremely low and the postoperative course was uneventful. Flexible instruments offer a very good chance to explore the intrarenal collecting system and transureteral nephroscopy through a 10.8 F flexible scope is a feasible and effective procedure.