Treatment patterns and survival in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the US Veterans Health Administration

Real-world use of androgen-deprivation therapy intensification for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic literature review of real-world data (RWD) studies to summarise treatment patterns among men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). While androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a primary treatment strategy for mHSPC, ADT intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and/or chemotherapy is recommended by current guidelines and has improved clinical outcomes in the last decade.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (PubMed; Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE]) for eligible studies (retrospective or prospective observational RWD studies examining mHSPC treatment patterns) between database inception and July 2023, and manually screened the past 2 years of relevant conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of 2336 retrieved citations, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering North America (United States, n = 21; Canada, n = 2), Europe (n = 8), and Asia (n = 6). Most studies utilised retrospective cohorts (n = 26) and included men with a median age of ≥70 years (n = 20). ADT monotherapy was predominantly used across geographies, followed by ADT + ARPI and ADT + docetaxel in the United States and Europe but not in Asia, where use of each combination remained low. Studies with recent electronic medical record data from cancer centres/registries showed >40% use of ADT + ARPI in the United States and Europe. Abiraterone was the most frequently used ARPI, followed by enzalutamide. Quantitative factors associated with ADT intensification were high disease burden, younger age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 1, fewer comorbidities, and oncologist physician specialty; qualitative factors were patient preference, unsatisfactory response to ADT, ability to tolerate adverse events, and absence of cost barriers.

CONCLUSION

While there was an increasing trend in ADT intensification for mHSPC over the study period across geographies, use remained suboptimal considering the high proportion of patients who were still receiving ADT monotherapy only. These findings highlight the need for interventions to further optimise current mHSPC therapies with high guideline concordance.

Real-World Evidence of Combination Therapy Use in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the United States From 2017 to 2023

PURPOSE

Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with robust clinical trial evidence on the benefits of combining androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs; abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide) and/or docetaxel (DOC). To understand current treatment approaches in clinical practice, we examined combined therapy for mHSPC in US real-world practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study used administrative claims in the Komodo Research Dataset (January 2016-September 2023). Individuals with mHSPC were identified on the basis of their earliest claim for metastasis on/after prostate cancer diagnosis date without evidence of castration resistance. Index date was the earliest ADT claim after mHSPC. Combination therapy included the addition of ARPI, DOC, or both to ADT within 4 months of index date. Multinomial regression was used to examine factors associated with combination therapy.

RESULTS

Study population consisted of 10,717 individuals, with a median age of 65 years and a majority of de novo mHSPC cases at diagnosis (62%). Overall, 28% received combination therapy with ARPI (18% abiraterone; 10% apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide), 9% with DOC, and 2.5% with ARPI plus DOC. From 2017 to 2023, combined hormonal therapy with ARPI increased from 13% to 47% and with ARPI plus DOC from 0.8% to 15%, whereas use of ADT plus DOC declined from 12% to 3% and ADT alone from 74% to 36%. Key factors associated with combination therapy were younger age, fewer chronic comorbidities, de novo mHSPC, and bone metastases.

CONCLUSION

Although one third of men received ADT alone in 2023, the use of combination hormonal therapy with ARPI and/or DOC increased between 2017 and 2023, highlighting uptake of guideline-recommended treatment, driven by available clinical evidence, disease burden, and tolerability.

Practice patterns and predictors of treatment intensification in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Treatment intensification beyond androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has shown survival benefit in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). There is a need to better understand how these novel treatments fit in real-world practice.

METHODS

Using electronic medical records and administrative data, a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with de novo mCSPC between 2010 and 2020 in Alberta, Canada, and initiated on ADT was conducted. Treatment intensification was defined as the receipt of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or chemotherapy (e.g., docetaxel) within 180 days of ADT initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 2515 de novo mCSPC were identified, with 2098 (83%) patients initiating ADT post-diagnosis. Of those, 525 (25%) received intensification beyond ADT. Three percent of patients were intensified in 2010-2013; this increased to 67% in 2020. From 2014-2017, docetaxel was the most used approach, although it was supplanted by abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, and enzalutamide from 2018 onwards. In multivariable logistic regression analyses of patients diagnosed from 2014-2020, significant predictors of intensification were younger age at diagnosis, lower Charlson comorbidity index, greater number of metastatic sites, shorter time to ADT initiation, referral to a medical oncologist, transurethral resection of the prostate or radiation prior to ADT, and more recent year of diagnosis (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a considerable increase in the use of ADT intensification therapies that correspond with the timing of clinical trial data and approvals of novel agents.

Darolutamide in Combination With Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer From the Phase III ARANOTE Trial

PURPOSE

For patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), delaying progression to castration-resistant disease is important not only for overall survival (OS) but also for patients' quality of life. Darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with docetaxel improved OS versus ADT and docetaxel in patients with mHSPC. The ARANOTE trial evaluated darolutamide and ADT without chemotherapy in patients with mHSPC.

METHODS

In this global phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo, with concomitant ADT. The primary end point was radiological progression-free survival (rPFS).

RESULTS

From March 2021 to August 2022, 669 patients were randomly assigned (darolutamide n = 446; placebo n = 223). At the primary cutoff date (June 7, 2024), darolutamide plus ADT significantly improved rPFS, reducing the risk of radiological progression or death by 46% versus placebo plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71]; P < .0001), with consistent benefits across subgroups, including high- and low-volume disease. OS results were suggestive of benefit with darolutamide versus placebo (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12]), and clinical benefits were seen across all other secondary end points, including delayed time to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.51]) and time to pain progression (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.96]). Adverse events were similar in the two groups. Notably, the incidence of fatigue was lower in patients receiving darolutamide (5.6%) versus those receiving placebo (8.1%), and fewer patients receiving darolutamide (6.1%) versus placebo (9.0%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of darolutamide plus ADT in patients with mHSPC, demonstrating clinically and statistically significant improvement in rPFS and a favorable safety profile consistent with prior phase III darolutamide trials.

Physician Reasons for or Against Treatment Intensification in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Importance

Clarifying the underutilization of treatment intensification (TI) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) may improve implementation of evidence-based medicine and survival outcomes.

Objective

To investigate physicians' beliefs about TI in mCSPC to understand the gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This survey study analyzed data from the Adelphi Real World retrospective survey, which comprised physician surveys that were linked to medical record reviews of US adult patients treated for mCSPC between July 2018 and January 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The survey included questions on physician and practice demographics. Physicians completed patient record forms, based on patient medical records with information including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient management. Physicians recalled reasons for prescribing decisions using 48 precoded and open-text responses. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed the likelihood of their patients receiving first-line TI; the main outcome was the likelihood of their patients receiving TI using odds ratios (ORs).

Results

In total, 617 male patients met the analysis criteria (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [8.1] years). Among these patients, 349 (56.6%) were Medicare beneficiaries. Overall, 430 (69.7%) did not receive first-line TI with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and/or chemotherapy. The 107 US-based physicians' top reasons for treatment choice for their patients were tolerability concerns (TI: 121 [64.7%]; no TI: 252 [58.6%]; P = .18) and following guideline recommendations (TI: 115 [61.5%]; no TI: 230 [53.5%]; P = .08). In the bivariate analysis, physicians seeking to reduce prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by 75% to 100% were more likely to provide first-line TI compared with physicians who aimed to lower PSA by 0% to 49% (OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.04-2.56]; P = .03). In the multivariable analysis, patients whose physicians based treatment choice on guidelines were more likely to receive TI than patients whose physicians did not report this reason (OR, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.32-9.08]; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study, which analyzed data from a medical records-linked clinical practice survey, indicated low rates of first-line TI for mCSPC despite guideline recommendations. Barriers to TI included lack of knowledge about guidelines and published efficacy and safety data. Physicians with greater PSA reduction goals were more likely to use TI. Physician education on treatment guidelines and clinical trial data, while raising expectations for PSA response, may increase rates of first-line TI in mCSPC.

Emerging racial disparities among Medicare beneficiaries and Veterans with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that Black men receive worse prostate cancer care than White men. This has not been explored in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in the current treatment era.

METHODS

We evaluated treatment intensification (TI) and overall survival (OS) in Medicare (2015-2018) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 2015-2019) patients with mCSPC, classifying first-line mCSPC treatment as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + novel hormonal therapy; ADT + docetaxel; ADT + first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen; or ADT alone.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2226 Black and 16,071 White Medicare, and 1020 Black and 2364 White VHA patients. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.81) and without Medicaid (adjusted OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.87). Medicaid patients had less TI irrespective of race. OS was worse for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.09-1.31) and without Medicaid (adjusted HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01-1.27). OS was worse in Medicaid vs without Medicaid, with no significant OS difference between races. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White VHA patients (adjusted OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92), with no significant OS difference between races.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-recommended TI was low for all patients with mCSPC, with less TI in Black patients in both Medicare and the VHA. Black race was associated with worse OS in Medicare but not the VHA. Medicaid patients had less TI and worse OS than those without Medicaid, suggesting poverty and race are associated with care and outcomes.

Hormonal treatment for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: a population-based study from the California cancer registry

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate how often men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) receive standard of care treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

METHODS

Men aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed mPC (stage IV) between 2010 and 2018 were identified using California Cancer Registry data. Receipt of hormonal therapy as initial cancer treatment was examined by patient/tumor characteristics at time of diagnosis. Chi-square tests and logistic regression, adjusted for covariates, were performed to assess association between receipt of hormonal therapy and patient/tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 13,680 men with newly diagnosed mPC, of which 3637 had local metastasis (N1) only while 9596 had distant metastasis (M1) with or without N1 disease. 21.8 % (n = 2980) of men did not receive ADT. The highest rate of receiving ADT was among men between ages 75-84 (81.6%) and the lowest rate was in men over 85 (76.0%). Asian men had the largest proportion receiving ADT (n = 962, 81.5%) with remaining subgroups having similar proportion of men receiving ADT (76.8% to 77.2%). Once adjusted for covariates, regression results showed men with a higher Gleason score (8-10) were more likely to receive ADT (OR 2.04, 1.82-2.27, p = < 0.001) as well as men with distant sites of metastatic disease (OR 4.02, 3.62-4.46, p = < 0.001). Men residing in neighborhoods with the lowest socioeconomic status were least likely to receive ADT (OR 0.79, 0.68-0.93, p = 0.0032). No differences in receipt of ADT were observed by race/ethnicity.

DISCUSSION

Despite significant advancements in the treatment of mPC in recent years, over one-fifth of patients did not receive ADT, which is the backbone for all new systemic therapies. This dataset might help address some of the prostate cancer care disparities in California.

Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Real-World Practice Patterns from the CancerLinQ Database

BACKGROUND

In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), androgen deprivation therapy and standard of care treatment intensification with docetaxel and/or an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) are associated with improved survival outcomes for appropriate patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study selected patients with de novo mHSPC diagnosed between 2014 and 2023 from CancerLinQ Discovery®, a United States (US)-based, de-identified clinical database. Patient-level data, including clinical characteristics, treatments, and demographics, were collected from CancerLinQ. Treatment intensification was defined as the use of docetaxel, abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide, or docetaxel plus abiraterone or darolutamide. Patient characteristics and treatment intensification data were analyzed descriptively and using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 3,684 patients with mHSPC, the overall rate of treatment intensification was 58.4% but increased from 32.5% in 2014 to 67.5% in 2023. A relative decline in docetaxel use was accompanied by an increase in ARSI use. Black patients with mHSPC were less likely to receive treatment identification (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95, P = 0.013). Treatment intensification was also less likely for patients of older age and increased ECOG performance status. Despite increasing treatment intensification for Black patients with mHSPC over time, rates of docetaxel use are disproportionately declining relative to White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment intensification rates are increasing to include the majority of patients with mHSPC. However, treatment disparities exist for Black patients, who are less likely to receive intensification. These findings illustrate the importance of promoting treatment intensification in appropriate patients and addressing racial treatment disparities.

Treatment trends in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to assess the trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 595, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor-burden disease, respectively. The Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor-burden disease, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found older age, poor performance status, and nonacademic center were significantly associated with the selection of vintage therapy. Of the 163 patients who received vintage hormone therapy after approval of upfront therapy, 74.2% had a specific reason for avoiding upfront therapy. The reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns.

CONCLUSION

Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. Older age, poor performance status, and facility bias were negatively associated with the use of upfront combination therapy.

Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to better characterize the epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and current treatment patterns of de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) in the United States Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

METHODS

In this observational retrospective cohort study, 400 de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) patients diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2020 (follow-up through December 2021) were randomly selected. omHSPC was defined as five or less total metastases (excluding liver) by conventional imaging. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated overall survival (OS) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival from mHSPC diagnosis date and a log-rank test compared these outcomes by oligometastatic status.

RESULTS

Twenty percent (79 of 400) of de novo mHSPC patients were oligometastatic. Most baseline characteristics were similar by oligometastatic status; however, men with non-omHSPC had higher median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis (151.7) than omHSPC (44.1). First-line (1L) novel hormonal therapy was similar between groups (20%); 1L chemotherapy was lower in omHSPC (5%) versus non-omHSPC (14%). More omHSPC patients received metastasis-directed therapy/prostate radiation therapy (14%) versus non-omHSPC (2%). Median OS and CRPC-free survival (in months) were higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC (44.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33.9-not estimated vs. 26.2; 95% CI, 20.5-32.5, p = .0089 and 27.6; 95% CI, 22.1-37.2 vs. 15.3; 95% CI, 12.8-17.9, p = .0049), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 20% of de novo mHSPC were oligometastatic, and OS was significantly longer in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC. Although potentially "curative" therapy use was higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC, the percentages were still relatively low. Future studies are warranted given potential for prolonged responses with multimodal therapy inclusive of systemic and local therapies.

Real-world prevalence of adverse events with first-line systemic therapies among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines for treating metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) recommend treatment intensification of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with the addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), with or without docetaxel. However, the adoption of these treatment options has been slow, leading to therapeutic inertia. This real-world study was conducted to investigate the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) among treated patients diagnosed with mCSPC in the United States.

METHODS

This retrospective claim review estimated the occurrence of AEs among patients with mCSPC from January 2014 to June 2021 in the PharMetrics® Plus data set. The study focused on 10 common AEs (fatigue/asthenia, gastrointestinal [GI] AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, sexual function AEs, anemia, hypertension, pain, and edema) known to occur in ≥10% of patients and ≥2% more prevalent than those treated with ADT alone as selected from the US Food and Drug Administration prescribing information and published results from clinical trials. Proportions of patients experiencing these AEs at Day 90, 180, and then every 180 days until month 30 during the follow-up period were estimated using cumulative hazard plots. Results were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) across four treatment groups: ADT alone, ADT + nonsteroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) (bicalutamide, nilutamide, or flutamide), ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + ARPIs (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide). ADT-alone cohort was the reference group for all comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 4145 patients were included (ADT alone: 2318, ADT + NSAA: 632, ADT + docetaxel: 471, ADT + ARPIs: 724). At baseline, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 64.3 (60.1-73.1) years; most common sites of metastasis were bone only (n = 1886, 45.5%) and node only (n = 1237, 29.8%); most used medications were pain medications (n = 2182, 52.6%) and corticosteroids (n = 1213, 29.3%). Median (IQR) duration of follow-up 10.2 (6.1-16.6) months in ADT alone, 6.7 (4.1-11.5) months in ADT + NSAA, 5.1 (4.3-5.9) months in ADT + docetaxel, and 11.0 (6.6-17.0) months in ADT + ARPI cohort. The reported AEs increased over time for all assessed AEs, across all treatment groups. Compared with ADT alone, no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with AEs was seen in the ADT + ARPI or ADT + NSAA cohorts at months 3 and 12; a significantly higher proportion of patients in the ADT + docetaxel cohort experienced 6 of the 10 assessed AEs at month 3 (fatigue/asthenia, GI AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, anemia). During the follow-up period, on IPTW analysis, compared with ADT alone, a significantly higher proportion of patients experienced AEs with seven AEs in the ADT + docetaxel group (fatigue/asthenia, GI AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, anemia, edema; p < 0.001 for all seven), three AEs in the ADT + ARPI group (hot flash, p = 0.05; anemia, p = 0.01; edema, p = 0.019), and one AE in the ADT + NSAA group (anemia, p = 0.029). The proportion of patients with sexual function AE did not significantly differ between the treatment groups and ADT alone.

CONCLUSION

Results of this large, real-world study demonstrated that all treatment groups experienced an increase in the rates of AEs over time, including ADT alone. Most AE rates with ADT + ARPIs were comparable with ADT + NSAA and not significantly different from ADT alone. ADT + docetaxel cohort was associated with significantly higher rates for all AEs over time except hypertension, sexual dysfunction, and pain. This study provides real-world evidence on AEs, beyond controlled clinical trials, and may assist healthcare providers to make better-informed decisions about disease management among patients with mCSPC.

Prostate cancer cell-derived exosomes ZNF667-AS1 reduces TGFBR1 mRNA stability to inhibit Treg expansion and DTX resistance by binding to U2AF1

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (DTX) resistance attenuates anti-tumor effects of DTX on prostate cancer (mCRPC) and drug resistance was related to Treg expansion in tumors. ZNF667-AS1 played a suppressing role in various tumors and tumor-derived exosomes carry lncRNAs to participate in tumor progression. Here, the effects of ZNF667-AS1 on malignant characteristics and DTX resistance in PC and the effect and its underlying molecular mechanism of tumor-derived exosomes carrying ZNF667-AS1 on Treg expansion were investigated.

METHODS

The identification of exosomes were determined using TEM, NTA and western blot. The abundance of genes and proteins were evaluated using IHC, RT-qPCR, western blot and FISH. Malignant phenotypes of PC cells were evaluated by means of Edu, scratch test, transwell, CCK-8 and flow cytometry. The percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs was detected using flow cytometry. The location of ZNF667-AS1 was detected using nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation. The co-location of ZNF667-AS1 and U2AF1 protein was detected using IF-FISH assay. The interactions among ZNF667-AS1, TGFBR1 and U2AF1 were verified using RNA pull-down, RIP and dual luciferase activity.

RESULTS

ZNF667-AS1 expression in PC samples was lowered, which was negatively relative to poor prognosis and DTX resistance. ZNF667-AS1 overexpression inhibited malignant phenotypes of PC cells, tumor growth and DTX resistance. Besides, DTX resistant cell-derived exosomes expressed lower ZNF667-AS1 expression. Exosomes carrying exogenously high ZNF667-AS1 expression derived PC cells or serum of mice suppressed Treg expansion. On the mechanism, ZNF667-AS1 interacted with U2AF1 to destabilize TGFBR1 mRNA and reduce TGFBR1 expression in CD4+T cells.

CONCLUSION

ZNF667-AS1 suppressed cell growth of PC cells, tumor growth of mice and DTX resistance to PC cells and exogenously high ZNF667-AS1 expression in tumor-derived exosomes destabilized TGFBR1 mRNA and reduce TGFBR1 expression through interacting with U2AF1, thus resulting in attenuated Treg expansion, which was related to DTX resistance.

A Real World Observational Study Characterizing Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Androgen Receptor-Pathway-Inhibitor Therapies in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND

Data are needed to improve the current understanding of clinical management and characteristics of patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study using real-world, population-level data from Alberta, Canada included all individuals diagnosed in 2017-2020 with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) or nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For mCSPC, patients were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 180 days of initiating ADT, while patients with nmCRPC were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 2 years of diagnosis.

RESULTS

This study included 976 patients with mCSPC and 233 with nmCRPC of which 33.5% and 25.3% received an ARPI, respectively. The proportion of patients with mCSPC treated with an ARPI increased considerably for patients diagnosed in 2020 compared to 2017 (56.2% vs. 6.0%). In contrast, the use of ARPI to treat nmCRPC only increased marginally from 2017 to 2019/2020 (19.7% vs. 28.9%). Patients with mHSPC who were ARPI-exposed had longer median survival than patients who were ARPI-naive (38.47 (95% CI = 32.84-NA) vs. 34.19 (95% CI = 33.33-38.83; P = .03)), with a higher proportion of patients surviving to 2-years. For nmCRPC, survival was similar between ARPI-exposed and ARPI-naive. In multivariable analyses, receiving ARPI for mCSPC was associated with younger patient age, more recent diagnoses, fewer comorbidities, a higher number of metastatic sites, referral to a medical oncologist as well as receiving surgery and radiation before ADT. Receiving ARPI for nmCRPC was associated with referral to a medical oncologist, younger age, and more recent diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome analyses in this population suggest a continued unmet clinical need and complex clinical management pathways. Given that treatment pathways have evolved considerably, continued follow-up to understand the impact of these advancements on patient outcomes are warranted.

Lost opportunities: the underutilization of castrate-resistant prostate cancer treatment in real-world settings

Background

Various treatment regimens are now available for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This work evaluates the real-world prescription patterns of CRPC in a large tertiary care center and the factors influencing them.

Methods

Health records of 330 patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), treated and progressed to CRPC between 2016 and 2020, were reviewed from a prospective uro-oncological database. We studied their demographics, medical co-morbidities, treatment utilization patterns before and after progression to CRPC, and survival outcomes.

Results

The median age was 74 years [interquartile range (IQR), 67-80 years] at diagnosis of CRPC. At CRPC, beyond androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy, 70.3% (n=232) of patients received at least one additional line, 21.5% (n=71) received two lines, and 5.5% (n=18) received three lines of systemic treatments. As first-line treatment, novel hormonal agents (NHAs) were the most prescribed at 57.6% (n=190). The likelihood of receiving treatment was associated with age <65 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.08, P=0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-3.57] and lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (OR: 2.62, P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.07-6.45), treatment intensification for HSPC (OR 2.45, P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.07-5.62) and primary physician being an oncologist (OR 1.59, P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.04-2.48). Patients who received additional treatment lines at CRPC had longer survival (median: 23 vs. 17 months, OR 1.72, P<0.01, 95% CI: 1.23-2.38).

Conclusions

More than one in four patients do not receive any additional treatment line beyond ADT monotherapy and have worse survival outcomes. Health status, prescribing physician, and treatment at HSPC appear to affect prescription patterns at the CRPC stage.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the United States

Aim: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) prolong metastasis-free survival and overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). This study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns, utilization and survival outcomes in patients with nmCRPC.Patients & methods: This retrospective cohort study used Optum database electronic health records of patients with nmCRPC from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2020 in the US.Results: Of 1955 patients, >80% received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or ADT + first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) as first-line treatment, while only 8.24% received ADT + ARPI. ADT + ARPI remained underutilized even among those with high-risk nmCRPC. Further, ADT + NSAA had no survival benefit compared with ADT alone.Conclusion: Practice-improvement strategies are needed for treatment intensification with ARPIs for patients with nmCRPC.

Real-world treatment patterns and medical costs of prostate cancer patients in Switzerland - A claims data analysis

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most prevalent cancer in men in Switzerland. However, evidence on the real-world health care use of PC patients is scarce. The aim of this study is to describe health care utilization, treatment patterns, and medical costs in PC patients over a period of five years (2014-2018).

METHOD

We used routinely collected longitudinal individual-level claims data from a major provider of mandatory health insurance in Switzerland. Due to the lack of diagnostic coding in the claims data, we identified treated PC patients based on the treatments received. We described health care utilization and treatment pathways for patients with localized and metastatic PC. Costs were calculated from a health care system perspective.

RESULTS

A total of 5591 PC patients met the inclusion criteria. Between 2014 and 2018, 1741 patients had outpatient radiotherapy for localized or metastatic PC and 1579 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. 3502 patients had an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). 9.5% of these patients had a combination therapy with docetaxel, and 11.0% had a combination with abiraterone acetate. Docetaxel was the most commonly used chemotherapy (first-line; n = 413, 78.4% of all patients in chemotherapy). Total medical costs of PC in Switzerland were estimated at CHF 347 m (95% CI 323-372) in 2018.

CONCLUSION

Most PC patients in this study were identified based on the use of ADT. Medical costs of PC in Switzerland amounted to 0.45% of total health care spending in 2018. Treatment of metastatic PC accounted for about two thirds of spending.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with High-risk Metastatic Hormone-naïve Prostate Cancer: A 3-year Interim Analysis of the Observational J-ROCK Study

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), administered alone, as combined androgen blockade (CAB) or as ADT plus androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) or ADT plus docetaxel, is the standard treatment for metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) in Japanese real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in LATITUDE criteria high-risk mHNPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The longitudinal, multicentre, J-ROCK registry study enrolled patients initiating ADT in Japan after May 2019, and categorised them as cohort 1 (ADT or CAB) or cohort 2 (ADT plus ARSIs or docetaxel).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), time to castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated. PFS, time to CRPC, and OS were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method and between-cohort comparisons via multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 974 patients were included (cohort 1: 38.1%, cohort 2: 61.9%). CAB was preferred (67.4%) to ADT alone in cohort 1, and abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone was used most frequently in cohort 2 (59.4%). The proportion of patients with ≥50%/≥90% PSA decline or who achieved PSA ≤0.2/≤0.1 ng/ml tended to be higher in cohort 2. PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.55), time to CRPC (0.28; 95% CI 0.23-0.36), and OS (0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.82) were longer in cohort 2. In cohorts 1 and 2, adverse drug reactions of special interest (ADRSIs) occurred in 1.3% and 15.1%, and fatal adverse events occurred in 1.9% and 1.7%, respectively. Limitations included nonrandomised design, varying time since marketing authorisation for ARSIs, and limited safety assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

ADT plus ARSIs or docetaxel was used more frequently to treat high-risk mHNPC than standard ADT/CAB and was associated with more favourable clinical outcomes. Although ADRSIs were reported more in cohort 2, the safety profile was considered tolerable.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Although many treatment options are available for high-risk metastatic prostate cancer, there are limited reports on real-world clinical experience with different therapies outside of the clinical trial setting. In this study, we compared clinical and safety outcomes with different treatment regimens, using a large series of patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer across Japan. We found that androgen deprivation therapy in combination with newer androgen receptor signalling inhibitors resulted in improved response compared with androgen deprivation therapy alone or in combination with a first-generation antiandrogen.

Drug-drug interaction potential among patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with novel androgen receptor inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients are often older and use concurrent medications that increase the potential for drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study assessed pDDI prevalence in real-world nmCRPC patients treated with apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Castrated prostate cancer patients without metastases prior to androgen receptor inhibitor initiation were identified retrospectively via Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims data (8/2019-3/2021). The top 100 concomitant medications were assessed for pDDIs.

RESULTS

Among 1,515 patients (mean age: 77 ± 8 years; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index: 3 ± 3), 340 initiated apalutamide, 112 darolutamide, and 1,063 enzalutamide. Common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (80%) and central nervous system (52%). Two-thirds of the patients received ≥5 concomitant medications; 30 (30/100 medications) pDDIs were identified for apalutamide and enzalutamide each and 2 (2/100 medications) for darolutamide. Most pDDIs had risk ratings of C or D, but four for apalutamide were rated X. Approximately 58% of the patients on apalutamide, 5% on darolutamide, and 54% on enzalutamide had ≥1 identified pDDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed a higher frequency of pDDIs in patients receiving apalutamide and enzalutamide vs darolutamide. The impact of these could not be determined retrospectively. DDI risk should be carefully evaluated when discussing optimal therapy for patients with nmCRPC.

TALAPRO-3 clinical trial protocol: phase III study of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in combination with androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors are a promising therapeutic option for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. Here, we describe the design and rationale of the multinational, phase III, TALAPRO-3 study comparing talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide in patients with mCSPC and HRR gene alterations. The primary end point is investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per RECIST 1.1 in soft tissue, or per PCWG3 criteria in bone. The TALAPRO-3 study will demonstrate whether the addition of talazoparib can improve the efficacy of enzalutamide as assessed by rPFS in patients with mCSPC and HRR gene alterations undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT04821622 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Registry Name: Study of Talazoparib With Enzalutamide in Men With DDR Gene Mutated mCSPC. Date of Registration: 29 March 2021.

Does Research from Clinical Trials in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatment Translate into Access to Treatments for Patients in the "Real World"? A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Since 2015 there have been major advances in the management of primary metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following the publication of key clinical trials that demonstrated significant clinical benefits with docetaxel chemotherapy or novel hormone therapy (NHT) in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Despite these advances, there is evidence to show that these treatments are not being utilised for mHSPC in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utilisation of docetaxel and NHT in mHSPC in routine practice and the determinants of variation in their use.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and Embase were searched systematically for studies on utilisation of treatments for primary mHSPC that were based on regional or national data sets and published after January 2005. Study results were summarised using a narrative synthesis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirteen papers were included in the analysis, six full-text articles and seven abstracts, on studies that included a total of 166 876 patients. The utilisation rate of treatment intensification with either docetaxel or NHT (enzalutamide, apalutamide, or abiraterone) in addition to ADT ranged from 9.3% to 38.1% across the studies. Younger, White patients with fewer comorbidities and living in more urban settings were more likely to be prescribed treatment intensification. Patients treated in private academic institutions by oncologists were more likely to receive docetaxel or NHT. Socioeconomic status did not impact receipt of systemic therapy. NHT utilisation rates appear to have increased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the need to change the approach to the treatment of primary mHSPC in the real world by harnessing the practice-changing results from recent trials in this setting to optimise upfront systemic therapy for this patient population.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the use of treatments for primary metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer that showed a benefit in key clinical trials. We found that these treatments are underused, particularly among certain patient groups.

Characterizing the real-world economic burden of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the United States

AIMS

To describe healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

METHODS

Linked data from Flatiron Metastatic PC Core Registry and Komodo's Healthcare Map were evaluated (01/2016-12/2021). Patients with chart-confirmed diagnoses for metastatic PC without confirmed castration resistance in Flatiron who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or advanced therapy for mCSPC in 2017 or later (index date) with a corresponding pharmacy or medical claim in Komodo Health were included. Advanced therapies considered were androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors, chemotherapies, estrogens, immunotherapies, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and radiopharmaceuticals. Patients with <12 months of continuous insurance eligibility before index were excluded. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause and PC-related HRU and costs (medical and pharmacy; from a payer's perspective in 2022 $USD) were described in the 12-month baseline period and follow-up period (from the index date to castration resistance, end of continuous insurance eligibility, end of data availability, or death).

RESULTS

Of 871 patients included (mean age: 70.6 years), 52% initiated ADT monotherapy as their index treatment without documented advanced therapy use. During baseline, 31% of patients had a PC-related inpatient admission and 94% had a PC-related outpatient visit; mean all-cause costs were $2551 PPPM and PC-related costs were $839 PPPM with $787 PPPM attributable to medical costs. Patients had a mean follow-up of 15 months, during which 38% had a PC-related inpatient admission and 98% had a PC-related outpatient visit; mean all-cause costs were $5950 PPPM with PC-related total costs of $4363 PPPM, including medical costs of $2012 PPPM.

LIMITATIONS

All analyses were descriptive; statistical testing was not performed. Treatment effectiveness and clinical outcomes were not assessed.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study demonstrated a significant economic burden in mCSPC patients, and a propensity to use ADT monotherapy in clinical practice despite the availability and guideline recommendations of advanced life-prolonging therapies.

Far from the truth: Real-world treatment patterns among newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the era of treatment intensification

OBJECTIVES

Real-world uptake of treatment intensification (TI) with novel hormonal agents (NHA) or chemotherapy as treatment of metastatic prostate cancer remains low outside of trial settings. We aim to report the prescription patterns and treatment outcomes of de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in a tertiary institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using real-world data from a prospectively maintained prostate cancer registry. We selected patients newly diagnosed with mHSPC from January 2016 to December 2020. Clinicopathological parameters were recorded to determine their impact on prescription patterns.

RESULTS

In total, 585 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were identified. Prescription of NHA increased from 10.5% (2016) to 50.4% (2020), but that of chemotherapy declined. Factors associated with TI were (1) baseline health status: Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-2, ECOG 0-1, age ≤ 65, (2) disease burden: PSA (>400, CHAARTED high volume disease, p = 0.004), development of systemic complications and (3) physician factor: primary physician being uro-oncologist and medical oncologist versus general urologist. Patients with TI had a longer mean time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (45.0 vs. 32.5 months, HR 0.567, 95% CI: 0.441-0.730, p < 0.001) and overall survival (55.3 vs. 46.8 months, HR 0.612, 95% CI, 0.447-0.837, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the trend of treatment prescription of mHSPC and factors contributing to the use of TI. TI improved mean time to CRPC and OS.

Optimal combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: new evidence, challenges and unanswered questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the evidence supporting treatment intensification in mHSPC, with a focus on possible indications for treatment in each clinical setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a growing armamentarium of treatment options for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). These include combinations of treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and new antiandrogenic therapies. Treatment intensification with chemotherapy or newer hormonal agents may improve patient's oncologic outcomes, but it can also come with additional toxicities and costs. Therefore, we need to take into account individual patient factors and preferences when deciding on the optimal combination therapy. Additionally, ongoing research is needed to identify biomarkers and new image techniques that can predict response to treatment and identify the best candidate for each treatment.

SUMMARY

Challenges and unanswered questions regarding treatment intensification and de-intensification are still present. Further studies are still needed to identify which patients would benefit most from this approach to improve quality of life without compromising overall survival outcomes.

Real-World Treatment Trends Among Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Results from an International Study

BACKGROUND

Continuous androgen deprivation therapy ± first-generation non-steroidal antiandrogen was previously the standard-of-care for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Treatment intensification with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or taxane chemotherapy is now approved and guideline-recommended for these patients.

METHODS

Physician-reported data on adult patients with mCSPC from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Programme were analyzed descriptively. We evaluated real-world treatment trends for patients with mCSPC in 5 European countries (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy) and the United States (US), looking at differences between patients initiating treatment in 2016-2018 and in 2019-2020. We also investigated treatment trends by ethnicity and insurance status in the US.

RESULTS

This study found that most patients with mCSPC do not receive treatment intensification. However, greater use of treatment intensification with NHT and taxane chemotherapy was observed in 2019-2020 than in 2016-2018 across 5 European countries. In the US, greater use of treatment intensification with NHT in 2019-2020 than in 2016-2018 was observed for all ethnicity groups and those with Medicare and commercial insurance status.

CONCLUSIONS

As the number of patients with mCSPC who receive treatment intensification increases, more patients who progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will have been exposed to intensified treatments. Treatment options for patients with mCSPC and mCRPC overlap, suggesting that an unmet need will emerge for new therapies. Further studies are needed to understand optimal treatment sequencing in mCSPC and mCRPC.

Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From an International Study

BACKGROUND

There is limited real-world evidence on how increasing use of treatment intensification in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has influenced treatment decisions in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The study objective was to evaluate the impact of novel hormonal therapy (NHT) and docetaxel use in mCSPC on first-line treatment patterns among patients with mCRPC in 5 European countries and the United States (US).

METHODS

Physician-reported data on patients with mCRPC from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Program were descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 215 physicians provided data on 722 patients with mCRPC. Across 5 European countries and the US, 65% and 75% of patients, respectively, received NHT, and 28% and 9% of patients, respectively, received taxane chemotherapy as first-line mCRPC treatment. In Europe, patients who had received NHT in mCSPC (n = 76) mostly received taxane chemotherapy in mCRPC (55%). Patients who had received taxane chemotherapy, or who did not receive taxane chemotherapy or NHT in mCSPC (n = 98 and 434, respectively) mostly received NHT in mCRPC (62% and 73%, respectively). In the US, patients who had received NHT, taxane chemotherapy, or neither in mCSPC (n = 32, 12, and 72, respectively) mostly received NHT in mCRPC (53%, 83%, and 83%, respectively). Two patients in Europe were rechallenged with the same NHT.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that physicians consider mCSPC treatment history when making first-line treatment decisions in mCRPC. Further studies are needed to better understand optimal treatment sequencing, especially as new treatments emerge.

Prognostic Role of Dynamic Changes in Serological Markers in Metastatic Hormone Naïve Prostate Cancer

We investigated whether inter-patient variation in the dynamic trajectory of hemoglobin (Hb), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can prognosticate overall survival (OS) in de novo mHSPC. This is a secondary analysis of the LATITUDE trial in which high-risk de novo mHSPC patients were randomly assigned to receive either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus abiraterone or ADT plus placebo. We used a five-fold cross-validated joint model approach to determine the association of temporal changes in the serological markers with OS. Decision curve analysis was applied to determine the net benefit. When dynamic changes in Hb, LMR, NLR, PLR, and PSA were included in a multivariate joint model, an increase in the log of the current value of PSA (HR: 1.24 [1.20-1.28]) was associated with inferior OS. A multivariate joint model that captured dynamic trajectory of Hb, NLR, PLR, LMR, and PSA up to 24 months, showed a net benefit over the "treat all" strategy at a threshold of probability of approximately ≥30% while no net benefit was seen when dynamic change in PSA was omitted. Our joint model could be used for designing future adaptive trials investigating sequential treatment personalization.

A Real-World Evidence Study Using Alberta-Population-Based Data to Describe Treatment Patterns for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients (AWARENESS)

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has changed significantly. Current guidelines suggest the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus an additional systemic therapy, regardless of disease burden and risk, based on phase 1 evidence showing improved overall survival. We sought to describe treatment patterns of patients with mCSPC in the province of Alberta.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of male patients aged ≥18 with mCSPC at the time of diagnosis and who initiated ADT between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. Data were obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Patients were assigned to an ADT-alone cohort or a treatment intensification cohort (cohorts 2-5). The primary objectives of this study were to describe baseline characteristics and the treatment of mCSPC patients who initiated ADT with or without treatment intensification. Overall survival between cohorts was a secondary objective. Descriptive statistics were used to describe differences in baseline characteristics of each cohort. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided and are used to call out likely cohort differences descriptively.

RESULTS

Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, we identified a total of 960 patients with mCSPC (median age 74 years, IQR 66-82). Most patients received ADT alone (67%), followed by ADT plus abiraterone (18%), ADT plus docetaxel (12%), and ADT plus enzalutamide or apalutamide (3%). Over the study period, we observed an increase in the utilization of treatment intensification over time, in particular, the increased use of androgen-receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) therapies. Patients who received ADT alone were older, were more likely to have more than one comorbid condition, had fewer sites of metastatic disease, and were less likely to be on opioid medications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we show that patients who received ADT alone as treatment for mCSPC are older, have more comorbidities, and have less extensive disease. While there has been a decline over time in the number of patients treated with ADT alone, over 50% of all patients with mCSPC continue to receive ADT alone. Further work is needed to understand barriers to treatment intensification and for knowledge translation initiatives to improve the treatment of patients with mCSPC.

Enzalutamide Prior to Radium-223 Is Associated with Better Overall Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Compared to Abiraterone-A Retrospective Study

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a progressive stage of prostate cancer that often spreads to the bone. Radium-223, a bone-targeting radiopharmaceutical, has been shown to improve the overall survival in mCRPC in patients without visceral metastasis. However, the impact of prior systemic therapy on the treatment outcome of mCRPC patients receiving radium-223 remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the optimal choice of systemic therapy before radium-223 in mCRPC patients. The study included 41 mCRPC patients who received radium-223 therapy, with 22 receiving prior enzalutamide and 19 receiving prior abiraterone. The results showed that the median overall survival was significantly longer in the enzalutamide group than in the abiraterone group (25.1 months vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.049). Moreover, the number of patients requiring blood transfusion was higher in the abiraterone group than in the enzalutamide group (9.1% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.16). The study also found that the number of doses of Radium-223 received was significantly associated with overall survival (≥5 vs. <5, HR 0.028, 95%CI 0.003-0.231, p = 0.001). Our study provides insights into the optimal treatment choice for mCRPC prior to radium-223, indicating that enzalutamide prior to radium-223 administration may have better outcomes compared to abiraterone in mCRPC patients without visceral metastasis.

Docetaxel Enhances Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand-Mediated Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells via Epigenetic Gene Regulation by Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2

PURPOSE

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising cancer therapeutic agent because of its tumor selectivity and its ability to induce apoptosis in cancer cells while sparing most normal cells. We evaluated whether docetaxel enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in prostate cancer (PCa) cells and its mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LNCap-LN3, PC3, and DU 145 PCa cell lines were used to investigate the effects of TRAIL with docetaxel treatment (dosages, 1, 3, 5, and 10 nmol). To evaluate the mechanism, death receptor 4 (DR4), DR5, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and E2F1 levels were assessed in PCa cells.

RESULTS

Hormone-sensitive LNCap-LN3 showed apoptosis in proportion to the concentration of docetaxel. Castration-resistant PC3 and DU 145 showed no change irrespective of the docetaxel concentration. However, combinations of docetaxel (2 nM) and TRAIL (100 ng/mL) had a significant effect on apoptosis of DU 145 cells. In DU 145 cells, docetaxel reduced EZH2 and elevated expression of DR4. The decrease of EZH2 by docetaxel was correlated with the E2F1 level, which was considered as the promoter of EZH2. DZNep reduced EZH2 and elevated DR4 in all PCa cells. Additionally, DZNep-enhanced TRAIL mediated reduction of PCa cell viability.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel and the EZH2 inhibitor reduced EZH2 and elevated expression of DR4 in all PCa cell lines. Docetaxel-enhanced TRAIL mediated apoptosis in PCa via elevation of DR4 through epigenetic regulation by EZH2. To improve the efficacy of TRAIL for PCa treatment, adding docetaxel or EZH2 inhibitors to TRAIL may be promising.

Treatment Intensification Patterns and Utilization in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with mCSPC experience a longer overall survival with treatment intensification by addition of novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or docetaxel to androgen deprivation vs androgen deprivation alone. Real-world data report, however, that nearly half of mCSPC patients do not receive treatment intensification. In this study, treatment patterns and utilization of treatment intensification in mCSPC patients were described using the IQVIA Anonymized Patient Longitudinal Data, a dataset of fully adjudicated pharmacy and medical claims.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Reports on first line (1L) treatment patterns were obtained for years 2015 to 2021. Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare part D, cash transactions, and commercial data were included for years 2012 to 2021.

RESULTS

Nationwide, of 66,844 men with newly diagnosed mCSPC since 2015, on average 25% were prescribed NHT, and another 12% were prescribed chemotherapy. No differences were noted in treatment patterns based on U.S. regions and/or rural vs. urban communities. The disparity was observed in prescribing patterns between oncology and urology providers. Oncology providers prescribed 1L NHT on average 32% of the time, while urology providers did so 12% of the time. Furthermore, oncology providers prescribed chemotherapy on average 20% of the time, resulting in 52% of men with mCSPC receiving treatment intensification as 1L therapy. Patients' age group, community or health insurance did not account for the disparity between the 2 specialties.

CONCLUSION

Both medical oncology and urology providers need to improve their treatment intensification efforts for men with mCSPC to increase their patients' overall survival.

Androgen receptor genomic alterations and treatment resistance in metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Genomic alterations to the androgen receptor (AR) are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). AR copy number amplifications, ligand-binding domain missense mutations, and intronic structural rearrangements can all drive resistance to approved AR pathway inhibitors and their detection via tissue or liquid biopsy is linked to clinical outcomes. With an increasingly crowded treatment landscape, there is hope that AR genomic alterations can act as prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers to guide patient management.

METHODS

In this review, we evaluate the current evidence for AR genomic alterations as clinical biomarkers in mCRPC, focusing on correlative studies that have used plasma circulating tumor DNA to characterize AR genotype.

RESULTS

We highlight data that demonstrates the complexity of AR genotype within individual patients, and suggest that future studies should account for cancer clonal heterogeneity and variable tumor content in liquid biopsy samples. Given the potential for cooccurrence of multiple AR genomic alterations in the same or competing subclones of a patient, it is distinctly challenging to attribute blanket clinical significance to any individual alteration. This challenge is further complicated by the varied treatment exposures in contemporary patients, and the fact that AR genotype continues to evolve in the mCRPC setting across sequential lines of systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

As treatment access and liquid biopsy technology continues to improve, we posit that real-time measures of AR biology are likely to play a key role in emerging precision oncology strategies for metastatic prostate cancer.