The full blood count as a biomarker of outcome and toxicity in ipilimumab-treated cutaneous metastatic melanoma

Granulocytes and mast cells in AllergoOncology-Bridging allergy to cancer: An EAACI position paper

Derived from the myeloid lineage, granulocytes, including basophils, eosinophils, and neutrophils, along with mast cells, play important, often disparate, roles across the allergic disease spectrum. While these cells and their mediators are commonly associated with allergic inflammation, they also exhibit several functions either promoting or restricting tumor growth. In this Position Paper we discuss common granulocyte and mast cell features relating to immunomodulatory functions in allergy and in cancer. We highlight key mechanisms which may inform cancer treatment and propose pertinent areas for future research. We suggest areas where understanding the communication between granulocytes, mast cells, and the tumor microenvironment, will be crucial for identifying immune mechanisms that may be harnessed to counteract tumor development. For example, a comprehensive understanding of allergic and immune factors driving distinct neutrophil states and those mechanisms that link mast cells with immunotherapy resistance, might enable targeted manipulation of specific subpopulations, leading to precision immunotherapy in cancer. We recommend specific areas of investigation in AllergoOncology and knowledge exchange across disease contexts to uncover pertinent reciprocal functions in allergy and cancer and allow therapeutic manipulation of these powerful cell populations. These will help address the unmet needs in stratifying and managing patients with allergic diseases and cancer.

Eosinophilic granulocytes as a potential prognostic marker for cancer progression and therapeutic response in malignant melanoma

The importance of eosinophilic granulocytes in cancer has been widely discussed in recent years. The current study reviews the evidence on the role of eosinophilic granulocytes in melanoma as a prognostic marker for cancer progression and the efficacy of treatment with modern immune checkpoint inhibitors. A total of 33 human clinical studies were included in the review, with heterogeneous data due to differences in patients populations, study design and inclusion of small study groups. However, 28 of the 33 studies suggested that eosinophilic granulocytes could be used as a prognostic biomarker for outcome and/or potential response to systemic treatment and/or occurrence of adverse events in melanoma patients. Nevertheless, the exact role of eosinophils remains to be elucidated. Further prospective, larger and better controlled studies are warranted to clarify the significance of eosinophilic granulocytes in patients with melanoma, in more details.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: research advances in prediction and management

The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of malignant solid tumors in the last decade, producing lasting benefits in a subset of patients. However, unattended excessive immune responses may lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can manifest in different organs within the body, with pulmonary toxicity commonly referred to as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP). The CIP incidence remains high and is anticipated to rise further as the therapeutic indications for ICIs expand to encompass a wider range of malignancies. The diagnosis and treatment of CIP is difficult due to the large individual differences in its pathogenesis and severity, and severe CIP often leads to a poor prognosis for patients. This review summarizes the current state of clinical research on the incidence, risk factors, predictive biomarkers, diagnosis, and treatment for CIP, and we address future directions for the prevention and accurate prediction of CIP.

Baseline risk factors associated with immune related adverse events and atezolizumab

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer patients in the last decade, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose significant clinical challenges. Despite advances in the management of these unique toxicities, there remains an unmet need to further characterize the patient-level drivers of irAEs in order to optimize the benefit/risk balance in patients receiving cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

An individual-patient data post-hoc meta-analysis was performed using data from 10,344 patients across 15 Roche sponsored clinical trials with atezolizumab in five different solid tumor types to assess the association between baseline risk factors and the time to onset of irAE. In this study, the overall analysis was conducted by treatment arm, indication, toxicity grade and irAE type, and the study design considered confounder adjustment to assess potential differences in risk factor profiles.

Results

This analysis demonstrates that the safety profile of atezolizumab is generally consistent across indications in the 15 studies evaluated. In addition, our findings corroborate with prior reviews which suggest that reported rates of irAEs with PD-(L)1 inhibitors are nominally lower than CTLA-4 inhibitors. In our analysis, there were no remarkable differences in the distribution of toxicity grades between indications, but some indication-specific differences regarding the type of irAE were seen across treatment arms, where pneumonitis mainly occurred in lung cancer, and hypothyroidism and rash had a higher prevalence in advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to all other indications. Results showed consistency of risk factors across indications and by toxicity grade. The strongest and most consistent risk factors were mostly organ-specific such as elevated liver enzymes for hepatitis and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) for thyroid toxicities. Another strong but non-organ-specific risk factor was ethnicity, which was associated with rash, hepatitis and pneumonitis. Further understanding the impact of ethnicity on ICI associated irAEs is considered as an area for future research.

Conclusions

Overall, this analysis demonstrated that atezolizumab safety profile is consistent across indications, is clinically distinguishable from comparator regimens without checkpoint inhibition, and in line with literature, seems to suggest a nominally lower reported rates of irAEs vs CTLA-4 inhibitors. This analysis demonstrates several risk factors for irAEs by indication, severity and location of irAE, and by patient ethnicity. Additionally, several potential irAE risk factors that have been published to date, such as demographic factors, liver enzymes, TSH and blood cell counts, are assessed in this large-scale meta-analysis, providing a more consistent picture of their relevance. However, given the small effects size, changes to clinical management of irAEs associated with the use of Anti-PDL1 therapy are not warranted.

External validation of biomarkers for immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma, but commonly cause serious immune-mediated complications. The clinical ambition of reserving more aggressive therapies for patients least likely to experience immune-related adverse events (irAE) has driven an extensive search for predictive biomarkers. Here, we externally validate the performance of 59 previously reported markers of irAE risk in a new cohort of 110 patients receiving Nivolumab (anti-PD1) and Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) therapy. Alone or combined, the discriminatory value of these routine clinical parameters and flow cytometry biomarkers was poor. Unsupervised clustering of flow cytometry data returned four T cell subsets with higher discriminatory capacity for colitis than previously reported populations, but they cannot be considered as reliable classifiers. Although mechanisms predisposing some patients to particular irAEs have been described, we are presently unable to capture adequate information from pre-therapy flow cytometry and clinical data to reliably predict risk of irAE in most cases.

Prognostic role of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It remains controversial whether the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) serves as a potential indicator for the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to address this concern.

Methods

Up to March 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to retrieve potentially eligible articles. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship between PLR and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), while the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated to evaluate the relationship between PLR and the objective response rate (ORR) as well as the disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses were further performed to detect the source of heterogeneity and potential predictive value of PLR in different groups in terms of OS and PFS.

Results

A total of 21 included studies involving 2312 patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer OS (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.87-2.68; I² =44%; P=0.01) and PFS (HR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.36-2.04; I² =64%; P<0.01). Furthermore, elevated PLR showed a lower ORR (OR= 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.87, I²=20%; P=0.29) and DCR (OR= 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27-0.72, I²=61%; P=0.02). In subgroup analyses, pretreatment PLR was significantly associated with adverse OS and PFS. The same results were observed in different PLRs in terms of cutoff value (>200 vs. ≤200). Furthermore, high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, PLR was not associated with OS and PFS in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, PLR predicted poor OS irrespective of regions and types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Conclusion

On the whole, patients with low PLR had better OS and PFS, as well as higher ORR and DCR when receiving immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer especially for advanced NSCLC. And further investigations are warranted to confirm the prognostic value of PLR in advanced SCLC.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022315976.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed promising therapeutic efficacy on melanoma. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed predictive values on prognosis of various tumors, but not on melanoma yet. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the prognostic role of NLR and LDH levels in melanoma treated with ICIs.

METHODS

A search was conducted for all reports published till March 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Studies were included if they investigated the association between pretreatment NLR/LDH and prognosis in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. Subgroup analysis, publication bias, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 6817 melanoma patients were included. Overall, high pretreatment NLR and LDH were associated with poor overall survival (OS) (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated NLR and LDH levels were associated with poor OS and PFS in patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 alone. NLR level was superior in predicting OS if compared with LDH level in patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4. In subgroup analysis stratified by cutoff value, high NLR level was associated with poor OS and PFS regardless of cutoff value, but LDH works when cutoff value = upper normal limit (UNL). The predictive value of NLR and LDH levels on OS and PFS was partially compromised in the Asian populations, compared with the Western countries.

CONCLUSION

Blood NLR and LDH levels showed great potential to be used as early prognostic biomarkers in melanoma patients treated with ICIs.

CD21lo B Cells Could be a Potential Predictor of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy increases the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In particular, combination checkpoint blockade (CCB) targeting inhibitory CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors could lead to irAEs at a higher rate than ICI monotherapy. Management of irAEs is important while using ICIs. However, there are no reliable biomarkers for predicting irAEs. The aim of this study was to elucidate early B cell changes after CCB therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and verify whether B cells can be a predictor of irAEs. This prospective cohort study was conducted with 23 Japanese patients with metastatic RCC. An increase in the proportion of CD21^lo B cells and CD21^lo memory B cells was confirmed following CCB therapy. Although there were no differences in clinical outcomes between irAE and no-irAE groups, the proportion of CD21^lo B cells at baseline was lower in the irAE group, with a significant increase after the first cycle of CCB therapy. Further analysis revealed a moderate correlation between irAEs and CD21^lo B cell levels at baseline (area under the curve: 0.83, cut-off: 3.13%, sensitivity: 92.3, specificity: 70.0). This finding indicates that patients with low baseline CD21^lo B cell levels warrant closer monitoring for irAEs. The clinical registration number by the Certified Review Board of Ehime University is No. 1902011.

MelRisk: Using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to improve risk prediction models for metastatic cutaneous melanoma in the sentinel lymph node

BACKGROUND

Identifying metastatic melanoma in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is important because 80% of SLN biopsies are negative and 11% of patients develop complications. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a biomarker of micrometastatic disease, could improve prediction models for SLN status. We externally validated existing models and developed 'MelRisk' prognostic score to better predict SLN metastasis.

METHODS

The models were externally validated using data from a multicenter cohort study of 1,251 adults. Additionally, we developed and internally validated a new prognostic score `MelRisk', using candidate predictors derived from the extant literature.

RESULTS

The Karakousis model had a C-statistic of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54-0.62). The Sondak model had a C-statistic of 0.57 (95% CI 0.53-0.61). The MIA model had a C-statistic of 0.60 (95% CI. 0.56-0.64). Our 'MelRisk' model (which used Breslow thickness, ulceration, age, anatomical site, and the NLR) showed an adjusted C-statistic of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.64).

CONCLUSION

Our prediction tool is freely available in the Google Play Store and Apple App Store, and we invite colleagues to externally validate its performance .

Biomarkers and risk factors for the early prediction of immune-related adverse events: a review

In recent years, immunotherapy has been widely used to treat patients with malignant tumors. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve the prognosis of cancer patients, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is increasing. Not only can irAEs accumulate in multiple organ systems throughout the body, but rare adverse reactions may also occur continuously. In severe cases, irAEs can be life-threatening or even lead to death. Therefore, the early identification, diagnosis and treatment of irAEs are very important. Early identification of patients with high-risk irAEs as well as the reduction or avoidance of severe irAEs have important clinical significance. This article will review the research progress of early predictive biomarkers and risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs and propose potential future directions for follow-up research and clinical applications.

The Prognostic Significance of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment in metastatic melanoma, but alternative biomarkers that are economical, simple and reliable still need to be clarified. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the prognostic significance of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in melanoma patients with immunotherapy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until September 16, 2020. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to investigate the association of baseline NLR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analyses, publication bias assessment, and the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method were used to evaluate the stability of results. A total of 18 studies including 2054 patients were included in our analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that higher baseline NLR was associated with a poorer OS (HR=2.46, 95% CI=1.77, 3.43) and PFS (HR=2.38, 95% CI=1.95, 2.89) of melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy. Subgroup analysis according to immunotherapy type showed that the prognostic effects of baseline NLR existed in all the subtypes of immunotherapy, including anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapy (OS HR=2.26, 95% CI=1.43, 3.59; PFS HR=2.68, 95% CI=1.79, 4.02), antiprogrammed cell death-1 therapy (OS HR=3.08, 95% CI=2.21, 4.27; PFS HR=2.01, 95% CI=1.64, 2.47), and combination therapy (OS HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.13, 2.72; PFS HR=3.13, 95% CI=1.63, 6.03). Conclusions were still consistent in subgroup analyses stratified by study year, region, study type, sample size, analysis of HR and cuttoff of baseline NLR. Altogether, baseline NLR is a promising prognostic biomarker for melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy.

Does the Use of Peripheral Immune-Related Markers Indicate Whether to Administer Pazopanib, Trabectedin, or Eribulin to Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients?

Pazopanib, trabectedin, and eribulin are administered for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs); however, there is little consensus on which agent should be preferentially used in a clinical setting. This study assessed whether peripheral immune-related markers served as a useful reference when selecting pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin. This study included 63 patients who were administered pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin for advanced STSs between March 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the first drug administered among these three drugs. Differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among the three groups were analyzed. OS showed no significant differences among the drugs administered first. For patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the OS of patients administered pazopanib as the first choice was shorter than the others (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94–18.13, p = 0.0018). In the low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) subgroup, the OS of the patients administered eribulin for the first choice was longer than that of the others (HR = 0.32, 95%CI = 0.10–0.98, p = 0.046). Therefore, NLR and PLR might be used as prognostic indicators to dictate whether STS patients receive pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin.

Prognostic significance of platelet lymphocyte ratio in patients with melanoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the prognostic role of platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with melanoma through performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for potential studies. The basic characteristics and relevant data were extracted. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to evaluate the prognostic role of PLR in patients with melanoma.

RESULTS

Ten studies enrolling 2422 patients were included. The pooled hazard ratios of higher PLR for overall survival and progression-free survival in melanoma were 1.70 (95% CI, 1.22-2.37) and 1.65 (95% CI, 1.10-2.47), respectively. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses were also performed. No significant publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that higher PLR was associated with poorer overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with melanoma. These findings may help to determine the prognosis and explore future novel therapies based on modulating inflammation and immune responses in melanoma.

Low-dose interferon-alpha preconditioning and adoptive cell therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard (immune) therapies: a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with tumor-reactive T cells has shown consistent clinical efficacy. We evaluated the response to ACT in combination with interferon alpha (IFNa) preconditioning in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma, most of which were progressive on cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and/or programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint blockade therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients were treated with ex vivo expanded tumor reactive T cells, derived from mixed lymphocyte autologous tumor cultures, or with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and evaluated for clinical response. Clinical and immunological parameters associated with response were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Best overall response defined as clinical benefit, comprising either complete response, partial response or stable disease >6 months, was observed in 29% of the patients. Forty-three per cent of the 14 immunotherapy-naïve patients and 20% of the 20 patients progressive on prior immunotherapy benefited from ACT. The overall survival (OS) was 90% versus 28.6% at 1 year and 46.7% versus 0% at 3 years follow-up, of responder and non-responder patients, respectively. Median OS was 36 versus 7 months, respectively. IFNa pretreatment resulted in leukopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia, which was sustained during the treatment in clinical responders and associated with response. Differences in antigen specificity, but not in phenotype, cytokine profile or CD8+ T cell number of the ACT products correlated with clinical response. Cross-reactivity of the ACT products to one or more allogeneic human leukocyte antigen-matched melanoma cell lines was associated with short OS after treatment while the ACT products of very long-term survivors showed no cross-reactivity but recognized patient-specific neoantigens.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that ACT in combination with a mild IFNa preconditioning regimen can induce clinical benefit even in immunotherapy pretreated patients, although with lower success than in immunotherapy-naïve patients. ACT products comprising neoantigen reactivity may be more effective.

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis, Severity, and Prognosis of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer

Background

Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal immune-related adverse event that occurs during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the roles played by peripheral blood parameters in CIP development remain unclear. Here, we aimed to identify which blood biomarkers correlated with the development and prognosis of CIP in patients with lung cancer.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 87 patients with CIP (CIP group) and 87 patients without CIP (control group). Cytokines, blood routine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin (ALB) were collected at baseline (before ICIs), at onset of pneumonitis (in the CIP group), and before the last dose of ICI (in the control group). We compared the baseline values and changes over time in various blood parameters between the CIP and control groups. The CIP outcomes were collected and compared according to the median values of these parameters.

Results

Squamous carcinoma (odds ratio [OR]: 3.02; p = 0.004) and ICI monotherapy (OR: 6.56; p = 0.004) correlated with a high risk of CIP. In the CIP group, interleukin (IL)-6 and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at CIP were significantly increased relative to baseline. By contrast, IL-6 and PLR reduced over time in the control group. Significant decrease in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and increases in IL-10, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and LDH levels were observed from baseline to CIP. No significant change in these parameters was observed in the control group relative to baseline. ALB decreased in both groups, but the decrease in the CIP group was greater (9.21% vs. 2.44%; p = 0.020). High IL-6 levels (OR: 5.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–23.86; p = 0.033), and low levels of ALB (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04–0.64; p = 0.009) measured at the time of CIP symptom onset were associated with severe pneumonitis. Low concentration of IL-6 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03–0.95; p = 0.044) and high ALB levels (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08–0.94; p = 0.040) were correlated with favorable overall survival in CIP.

Conclusions

Increase in IL-6, IL-10, NLR, PLR, and LDH levels or reduced ALC and ALB levels were associated with the occurrence of CIP in lung cancer patients. High IL-6 and low ALB levels at onset of CIP were related to severe grade and poor prognosis of CIP.

Comparison of non-myeloablative lymphodepleting preconditioning regimens in patients undergoing adoptive T cell therapy

Background

Adoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) or tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) demonstrates impressive clinical results in patients with cancer. Lymphodepleting preconditioning prior to cell infusion is an integral part of all adoptive T cell therapies. However, to date, there is no standardization and no data comparing different non-myeloablative (NMA) regimens.

Methods

In this study, we compared NMA therapies with different doses of cyclophosphamide or total body irradiation (TBI) in combination with fludarabine and evaluated bone marrow suppression and recovery, cytokine serum levels, clinical response and adverse events.

Results

We demonstrate that a cumulative dose of 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and 125 mg/m² fludarabine (120Cy/125Flu) and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning were equally efficient in achieving deep lymphopenia and neutropenia in patients with metastatic melanoma, whereas absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and absolute neutrophil counts were significantly higher following 200 cGyTBI/75Flu-induced NMA. Thrombocytopenia was most profound in 120Cy/125Flu patients. 30Cy/75Flu-induced preconditioning in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia resulted in a minor ALC decrease, had no impact on platelet counts and did not yield deep neutropenia. Following cell infusion, 120Cy/125Flu patients with objective tumor response had significantly higher ALC and significant lower inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis 7 days after cell infusion was performed to determine the cut-offs, which distinguish between responding and non-responding patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort. NLR≤1.79 and PLR≤32.7 were associated with clinical response and overall survival. Cytokine serum levels did not associate with clinical response in patients with TIL. Patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort developed significantly more acute NMA-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia and cardiotoxicity, and stayed significantly longer in hospital compared with the 60Cy/125Flu and TBI/75Flu cohorts.

Conclusions

Bone marrow depletion and recovery were equally affected by 120Cy/125Flu and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning; however, toxicity and consequently duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the 60Cy/125Flu cohort. Patients in the 30Cy/75Flu and TBI/75Flu groups rarely developed NMA-induced adverse events; however, both regimens were not efficient in achieving deep bone marrow suppression. Among the regimens, 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning seems to achieve maximum effect with minimum toxicity.

The Association Between Inflammation and Immunosuppression: Implications for ICI Biomarker Development

Evasion of immune destruction is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer. Chronic inflammation can enable immune escape by suppressing immune surveillance and permitting the development of tumors and creating a tumor microenvironment that sustains cancer. This includes generating mechanisms that prevent the effectiveness of anti-tumor treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In this review, we explore the interplay of inflammation and immunosuppression, their effects on the tumor microenvironment, and their implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy particularly in the context of predictive biomarkers for their use.

Continuous monitoring of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio for estimating the onset, severity, and subsequent prognosis of immune related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a central role in various cancers. ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As severe irAEs can be life-threatening, biomarkers for estimating irAE onset are crucial. The neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) reflects the systemic immune condition and known as a prognostic marker in ICI treatment. Our study evaluated if the NLR corresponded with irAEs, and its feasibility as a biomarker for irAE onset. We retrospectively analyzed 275 cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. We observed 166 irAEs in 121 patients. The NLR was significantly elevated during irAEs. Patients experiencing interstitial pneumonitis showed NLR elevation 4 weeks before initial symptoms and diagnosis. Analyzing receiver operating characteristics curves revealed that elevated NLR distinguished subsequent pneumonitis severity with high accuracy (AUC 0.93, sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 88.2%, cut-off 2.37, p = 0.0004). After a severe irAE occurred, two NLR trends were observed. Patients who showed a prompt reduction in elevated NLRs had favorable progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.10–1.01, p = 0.0140) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.06–0.86, p = 0.0057) compared to the patients who maintained elevated NLRs. These findings suggest that continuous monitoring of NLR trends may predict irAE onset and severity and subsequent prognosis.

Nivolumab for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma previously untreated with ipilimumab: a single-institution retrospective study

We evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma previously untreated with ipilimumab. We performed a retrospective study at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan, where nivolumab was approved 1 year earlier than ipilimumab. Clinical efficacy outcomes were determined by assessing best overall response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), progression-free survival and overall survival. Fourteen patients were analyzed; none had received any prior systemic therapies although eight had undergone transarterial chemoembolization. The median follow-up period was 15 months. The objective response and disease control rates were 7.1% and 42.9%, respectively (one partial response and five stable diseases). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10 (range, 4-105) and 60 (range, 5-105) weeks, respectively. Liver metastases in three patients were all programmed cell death-1 ligand negative. Lower lactate dehydrogenase, development of vitiligo, and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio less than 5 at week 6 were associated with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival; of these, only a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio less than 5 at week 6 was statistically significant. Even with the use of nivolumab before ipilimumab, metastatic uveal melanoma appears to remain refractory to nivolumab monotherapy. However, because one patient in our cohort achieved an objective response, and the median overall survival exceeded 1 year, treatment strategies that incorporate anti-PD1 antibody should be further investigated. Whether a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio less than 5 at week 6 is a favorable early on-treatment marker should be validated in larger cohorts.

The biomarkers related to immune related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors

The enthusiasm for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), an efficient tumor treatment model different from traditional treatment, is based on their unprecedented antitumor effect, but the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is an obstacle to the prospect of ICI treatment. IrAEs are a discrete toxicity caused by the nonspecific activation of the immune system and can affect almost all tissues and organs. Currently, research on biomarkers mainly focuses on the gastrointestinal tract, endocrine system, skin and lung. Several potential hypotheses concentrate on the overactivation of the immune system, excessive release of inflammatory cytokines, elevated levels of pre-existing autoantibodies, and presence of common antigens between tumors and normal tissues. This review lists the current biomarkers that might predict irAEs and their possible mechanisms for both nonspecific and organ-specific biomarkers. However, the prediction of irAEs remains a major clinical challenge to screen and identify patients who are susceptible to irAEs and likely to benefit from ICIs.

The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex has prognostic significance and associates with immune microenvironment in skin cutaneous melanoma

PURPOSE

The Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase (NuRD) complex is an important marker in multiple biological processes whose clinical significance has rarely previously been reported in cancers. In this study, we proposed to estimate the potential of NuRD complex as prognostic signature in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) patients.

METHODS

SKCM samples were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Sample clustering was performed based on the mRNA levels of core subunits of NuRD complex. Survival analysis was carried out by using Kaplan-Meier method. SKCM samples were grouped into prognostically good and poor groups according to their overall survival (OS). Logistic regression analysis was adopted to construct a model based on the optimal subunits of NuRD complex to estimate prognosis of SKCM samples.

RESULTS

Samples from TCGA were grouped into four clusters which were then divided into good and poor prognostic groups. Significant differences existed in immune microenvironment and mutational rates of frequently mutated genes between good and poor prognostic groups. Besides, several immune-related pathways were significantly activated in good prognostic group. A logistic regression model was constructed by using patients' prognostic group and mRNA expressions of NuRD complex from TCGA as categorical responsive values and continuous predictive variables, respectively, which could independently distinguish prognostically different SKCM patients from another three independent GEO datasets.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we first reported the potential prognostic value and roles in immune microenvironment of NuRD complex in SKCM, which should be helpful for experimental and clinical research in SKCM.

Neutrophil diversity and plasticity in tumour progression and therapy

Neutrophils play a key role in defence against infection and in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. In cancer, tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs) have emerged as an important component of the tumour microenvironment. Here, they can exert dual functions. TANs can be part of tumour-promoting inflammation by driving angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodelling, metastasis and immunosuppression. Conversely, neutrophils can also mediate antitumour responses by direct killing of tumour cells and by participating in cellular networks that mediate antitumour resistance. Neutrophil diversity and plasticity underlie the dual potential of TANs in the tumour microenvironment. Myeloid checkpoints as well as the tumour and tissue contexture shape neutrophil function in response to conventional therapies and immunotherapy. We surmise that neutrophils can provide tools to tailor current immunotherapy strategies and pave the way to myeloid cell-centred therapeutic strategies, which would be complementary to current approaches.

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in melanoma: A meta-analysis involving 2099 patients

To investigate the prognostic role of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in melanoma through a meta-analytical method. The literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus electronic platforms. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Begg's test and Egger's test were used to assess potential publication bias. A total of eight retrospective cohort studies involving 2099 patients were included in the meta-analysis. No significant association between the PLR and OS was found (HR = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.97-1.99; P = .075). There was also a nonsignificant correlation between the PLR and PFS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.98-2.27; P = .065). In addition, there was no significant association between the PLR and sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.23-5.66; P = .869) or age (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.41-1.59; P = .539). No significant publication bias was found in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis suggests that the PLR may not be a significant prognostic marker in patients with melanoma.

Prognostic Value of the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The prognostic role of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is controversial in patients with melanoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of the PLR in patients with melanoma. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, WanFang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for eligible studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between the PLR and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Nine studies with 2,396 patients were included in this meta-analysis. A high PLR was a predictor of shorter OS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.18-2.38, p = 0.004), but not PFS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.96-2.44, p = 0.075) in patients with melanoma. Subgroup analysis revealed that the PLR remained a significant prognostic indicator of both OS and PFS in patients with non-metastatic disease; the PLR cutoff value of <120 had a consistent prognostic value. Conclusions: An increased PLR was associated with poor OS of patients with melanoma. Hence, we suggest that the preoperative PLR could be used to identify high-risk patients and provide information regarding the prognosis of patients with melanoma.

Peripheral blood cell count ratios are predictive biomarkers of clinical response and prognosis for non-surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy

Background

Peripheral blood cell count ratios, including the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), have been reported to be prognostic factors in many malignancies as markers of inflammation and immune status. The aim of this study was to determine whether NLR, PLR, or LMR can be clinical response and prognostic biomarkers of non‐surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with radiotherapy.

Methods

193 non‐surgical ESCC patients who underwent radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The peripheral blood cell count ratios were obtained before, during (weekly) and at the end of the treatment. Then, we compared the subsequent results with the corresponding pretreatment values and computed the rates of change, which were defined as cNLR, cPLR, and cLMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for overall survival (OS). Ordinal logistic regression was used to analyze the clinical response.

Results

In multivariate analysis, cNLR at week 4(P = .026) and week 5(P = .025) during radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS, along with BMI, tumor stage, tumor length, tumor location, and grade of adverse events. Besides, BMI, tumor stage, tumor length, adverse event grade, cNLR at week 4(P = .044) and week 5(P = .013), and cPLR at week 4(P = .034) and week 5(P = .015) were significantly associated with the clinical response in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The cNLR at weeks 4 and 5 was negatively correlated with the OS and clinical response of non‐surgical ESCC patients treated with radiotherapy. The elevated cPLR at weeks 4 and 5 was only related to poor clinical response.

Biomarkers, measured during therapy, for response of melanoma patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which target CTLA-4 or PD-(L)1 molecules, have shown impressive therapeutic results. Durable responses, however, are only observed in a segment of the patient population and must be offset against severe off-target immune toxicity and high costs. This calls for biomarkers that predict response during ICI treatment. Although many candidate biomarkers exist, as yet, there has been no systematic overview of biomarkers predictive during. Here, we provide a systematic review of the current literature of ICI treatment to establish an overview of candidate predictive biomarkers during ICI treatment in melanoma patients. We performed a systematic Medline search (2000-2018, 1 January) on biomarkers for survival or response to ICI treatment in melanoma patients. We retrieved 735 publications, of which 79 were finally included in this systematic review. Blood markers were largely studied for CTLA-4 ICI, whereas tumor tissue markers were analyzed for PD-(L)1 ICI. Blood cytology and soluble factors were more frequently correlated to overall survival (OS) than response, indicating their prognostic rather than predictive nature. An increase in tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T-cells and a decrease in regulatory T-cells were correlated to response, in addition to mutational load, neoantigen load, and immune-related gene expression. Immune-related adverse events were also associated frequently with a favorable response and OS. This review shows the great variety of potential biomarkers published to date, in an attempt to better understand response to ICI therapy; it also highlights the candidate markers for future research. The most promising biomarkers for response to ICI treatment are the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (especially vitiligo), lowering of lactate dehydrogenase, and increase in activated CD8 + and decrease in regulatory T-cells.

The immune-metabolic-prognostic index and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma under checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

This prospective study evaluated whether peripheral blood biomarkers and metabolic parameters on F-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) could be associated with clinical outcome in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

Data from 33 patients with NSCLC and treated with ICI were collected. Complete blood cell counts before and at the first restaging were measured. All patients underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT at baseline, while 25 patients at the first restaging. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined and compared using the Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank test. The median follow-up was 11.3 months (range 1-17 months).

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses demonstrated that low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR < 4.9) and low total lesion glycolysis (TLG < 541.5 ml) at the first restaging were significantly associated with PFS (both p = 0.019) and OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively). An immune-metabolic-prognostic index (IMPI), based on post-NLR and post-TLG was developed, categorizing 3 groups: high risk, 2 factors; intermediate risk, 1 factor; low risk, 0 factors. Median PFS for low, intermediate and high risk was 7.8 months (95% CI 4.6-11.0), 5.6 months (95% CI 3.8-7.4), and 1.8 months (95% CI 1.6-2.0) (p < 0.001) respectively. Likewise, median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI 10.9-19.6), 13.2 months (95% CI 5.9-20.3), and 2.8 months (95% CI 1.4-4.2) (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

IMPI at the first restaging, combining both inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers, was correlated with PFS and OS. IMPI can be a potentially valuable tool for identifying NSCLC patients who are likely to benefit from ICI.

Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab

Ipilimumab was the first immunotherapy approved for metastatic melanoma in decades and is currently registered as a second-line treatment. However, new immunotherapies, in combination with ipilimumab, offer even better clinical outcomes for patients compared with single-agent treatments, at the expense of improved toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ipilimumab outside the clinical trials and to identify survival predictors for treatment benefit. Data were collected on 47 advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab between 2010 and 2015 at a single center. Association of clinical characteristics (including primary tumor characteristics), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, absolute eosinophil, lymphocyte, and neutrophil count, neutrophil/lymphocyte and eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio with toxicity and clinical outcome were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Median progression-free survival at a median follow-up of 10 months was 2.7 months and median overall survival was 9.8 months. Objective response was observed in 17% of patients and the disease control rate at week 24 was 40%. The 1- and 2-year survival rates documented were 40 and 28%, respectively. Significant association between high LDH level (>1.5× upper limit of normal) and decreased overall survival was demonstrated in uni- and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.554, 95% CI: 1.225-10.306, p = 0.019). Neither biomarkers nor clinical outcome were associated with toxicity. Using baseline serum LDH to identify patients most likely to benefit from ipilimumab therapy could serve as a simple and inexpensive biomarker of clinical outcome.

Management and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients with rapid progression under second-or-more-line immune checkpoint inhibitors: ERORECI study (GFPC 2016-04)

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, some patients' disease progressed rapidly and sometimes exhibited explosive tumor progression. This descriptive, prospective study aimed to assess the characteristics of nonresponders with rapid progression (RP), defined as progression-free survival (PFS) ≤2 or 2-4 months under ICIs.

METHODS

This analysis included all consecutive ICI-treated (second-or-more line) patients with RP ≤4 months from 1 September 2016 to 31 August 2017 and compared the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes (overall survival [OS]; responses; PFS, according to treatment line) of NSCLCs that progressed after ≤2 vs 2-4 months on ICIs.

RESULTS

Comparisons of the 224 (70.2%) patients with ≤2-month and 95 (29.8%) with 2- to 4-month RP revealed the former had less frequent nonsmokers and ECOG PS = 0, more frequent stage IV disease and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Their respective ICI PFS rates were: 1.6 [95% CI: 0.1-2] and 2.7 [2.0-4.2] months, with 16.5% and 11.6% having partial responses to first- and second-line therapies post-ICI chemotherapy. Their respective median OS rates were 6.0 and 9.0 months (P ≤ .009). Multivariate analysis retained only PFS of the first-line therapy pre-ICI and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio at ICI onset as being significantly associated with ≤2-month RP.

CONCLUSION

In the real-life setting, NSCLC RP on ICI remains a challenge. New descriptive and analytic studies are needed to identify factors predictive of RP.

Evaluation of the prognostic role of platelet-lymphocyte ratio in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Whether platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a prognostic factor for cancer patients treated with immunotherapy is under debate. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between PLR and survival of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

A systematical search was performed in databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to retrieve potential eligible clinical studies assessing the prognosis of cancer patients with high versus low PLR after immunotherapy, from the establishment of the database to June 2019. Quality evaluation of included studies was performed, and meta-analyses with regards to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were conducted using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 11.

RESULTS

A total of 12 eligible studies with 1340 cancer patients were included. Combined results showed that elevated PLR was a negative factor affecting the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. Patients with high PLR had a significantly shorter OS compared to those with low PLR (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46 to 2.80, P < 0.0001), as well as PFS (HR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.27 to 2.38, P = 0.0006). Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses revealed that the prognostic role of PLR on OS and PFS was dependent on cancer type, region, and cutoff value. For NSCLC patients, the disease stage, ICIs agent, and line of treatment may not influence the prognostic role of PLR.

CONCLUSION

PLR could be a routinely potential prognostic factor for ICIs. Low PLR may be associated with better survival for cancer patients when treated with immunotherapy.

Colitis after checkpoint blockade: A retrospective cohort study of melanoma patients requiring admission for symptom control

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have revolutionized oncologic therapy but can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Corticosteroids are first-line treatment with escalation to biologic immunosuppression in refractory cases. CPI-related gastroenterocolitis (GEC) affects 20%-50% of patients receiving CPIs and can carry significant morbidity and mortality. Severe CPI-related GEC is not well-described. We present the clinical characterization of all CPI-related GEC requiring admission at a single institution.

METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and endoscopic data were extracted from charts of all melanoma patients ≥18 years of age admitted to one institution for CPI-related GEC, from February 5, 2011 to December 13, 2016. Patients were followed until December 31, 2017 for further admissions. Survival, outcomes, and pharmaceutical-use analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Median time-to-admission from initial CPI exposure was 73.5 days. Median length of stay was 4.5 days. About 50.0% required second-line immunosuppression. Readmission for recrudescence occurred in 33.3%. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade was not significantly associated with outcomes. Hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.005), relative lymphopenia (P = 0.027), and decreased lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.026) were associated with second-line immunosuppression. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or OS (P = 0.367, 0.400) for second-line immunosuppression. Subgroup analysis showed that early corticosteroid administration (P = 0.045) was associated with decreased PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe CPI-related GEC typically manifests within 3 months of immunotherapy exposure. Rates of second-line immunosuppression and readmission for recrudescence were high. CTCAE grade did not capture the degree of severity in our cohort. Second-line immunosuppression was not associated with poorer oncologic outcomes; however, early corticosteroid exposure was associated with decreased PFS. Further investigation is warranted.

Correlation between blood cell count and outcome of melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibodies (αPD-1mAbs) have been shown to be effective for advanced malignant melanoma. Treatment with αPD-1mAbs can also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, clinical predictive factors for treatment responses or irAE risk remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify useful blood biomarkers for response and occurrence of irAEs with αPD-1mAbs treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients with melanoma treated with αPD-1mAbs at the University of Tsukuba Hospital. Clinical data including age, sex, clinical type, metastatic site, treatment course, blood laboratory tests, irAEs and treatment outcome were collected.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increased baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly associated with poor response (odds ratio [OR]: 2.638, P = 0.0227, cutoff value = 2.8). Similarly, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that NLR at baseline were significantly associated with shorter progression survival (hazard ratio: 1.343, P = 0.0095). As for irAEs, logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline absolute eosinophil count was positively associated with occurrence of endocrine irAEs (OR: 1.601, P = 0.045, cutoff value = 240/μL). Additionally, a higher relative eosinophil count at 1 month was significantly correlated with occurrence of endocrine irAEs (OR: 1.229, P = 0.0296, cutoff value = 3.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that NLR > 2.8 could be a useful baseline biomarker for indicating poor response to αPD-1mAbs treatment and that absolute eosinophil count >240/μL at baseline and relative eosinophil count at 1 month >3.2% could be useful biomarkers to predict endocrine irAEs in patients receiving αPD-1mAbs.

Change in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio during immunotherapy treatment is a non-linear predictor of patient outcomes in advanced cancers

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is known to be prognostic for patients with advanced cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but has generally been evaluated as a single threshold value at baseline. We evaluated NLR at baseline and within first month during treatment in patients who received ICI for advanced cancer to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and of changes from baseline to on-treatment NLR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI from 2011 to 2017 at the Ohio State University was performed. NLR was calculated at the initiation of ICI and repeated at median of 21 days. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the initiation of ICI to date of death or censored at last follow-up. Significance of Cox proportional hazards models were evaluated by log-rank test. Calculations were performed using the survival and survminer packages in R, and SPSS.

RESULTS

509 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Patients with baseline and on-treatment NLR < 5 had significantly longer OS (P < 0.001). The change in NLR overtime was a predictor of OS and was observed to be non-linear in nature. This property remained statistically significant with P < 0.05 after adjusting for age, body mass index, sex, cancer type, performance status, and days to repeat NLR measurement. Patients with a moderate decrease in NLR from baseline had the longest OS of 27.8 months (95% CI 21.8-33.8). Patients with significant NLR decrease had OS of 11.4 months (95% CI 6.1-16.7). Patients with a significant increase in NLR had the shortest OS of 5.0 months (95% CI 0.9-9.1).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the prognostic value of NLR in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs. We found that change in NLR over time is a non-linear predictor of patient outcomes. Patients who had moderate decrease in NLR during treatment with ICI were found to have the longest survival, whereas a significant decrease or increase in NLR was associated with shorter survival. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a non-linear change in NLR over time that correlates with survival.

Biomarkers for Predicting Efficacies of Anti-PD1 Antibodies

Therapeutic options for treating advanced melanoma are progressing rapidly. Although anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) antibodies (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab) have been approved as first-line and anchor drugs, respectively, for treating advanced melanoma, the efficacy appears limited as we expected, especially in Asian populations. Biomarkers to predict or evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD1 antibodies are needed to avoid subjecting patients to potentially severe adverse events associated with switching to other anti-melanoma drugs. This review focuses on the recent development of biomarkers for assessing the efficacy of anti-PD1 antibodies using routine blood tests such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil ratio, serum markers such as lactate dehydrogenase, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on melanoma cells, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency assays, as well as soluble CD163, and tumor-associated macrophage-related chemokines (e.g., CXCL5, CXCL10).

Baseline Absolute Lymphocyte Count and ECOG Performance Score Are Associated with Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade

Immune-checkpoint blockade in front-line or second-line treatment improves survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) when compared with chemotherapy alone. However, easily applicable predictive parameters are necessary to guide immune-checkpoint inhibition in clinical practice. In this retrospective bi-centric analysis, we investigated the impact of baseline patient and tumor characteristics on clinical outcome in aNSCLC patients treated with programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Between May 2015 and January 2018, 142 unselected consecutive NSCLC patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors during the course of disease. In multivariate analysis, we identified the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG > 1 versus ECOG ≤ 1, HR: 3.23, 95%CI: 1.58-6.60, P = 0.001), baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC; high: >0.93 × 109/L versus low: ≤ 0.93 × 109/L, HR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.23-0.62, P < 0.001), prior or concomitant anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting therapy (yes versus no, HR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.15-4.14, P = 0.017) and TNM stage (IV versus III, HR: 4.18, 95%CI: 1.01-17.36, P = 0.049) as the most relevant parameters for survival. Neither antibiotic exposure (antibiotic-positive versus antibiotic-negative, HR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.56-1.45, P = 0.675), nor PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1% versus <1%, HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.41-1.13, P = 0.140) was associated with survival. Baseline ECOG performance status and ALC were associated with survival in aNSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and assessment of these parameters could be suitable in clinical practice.

Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Tumor Response and Adverse Events

In the last decade, inhibitors targeting immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) brought about a major paradigm shift in cancer treatment. These immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved the overall survival of a variety of cancer such as malignant melanoma and non-small lung cancer. In addition, numerous clinical trials for additional indication of ICIs including adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies are also currently ongoing. Therefore, more and more patients will receive ICIs in the future. However, despite the improved outcome of the cancer treatment by ICIs, the efficacy remains still limited and tumor regression have not been obtained in many cancer patients. In addition, treatment with ICIs is also associated with substantial toxicities, described as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, biomarkers to predict tumor response and occurrence of irAEs by the treatment with ICIs are required to avoid overtreatment of ICIs and minimize irAEs development. Whereas, numerous factors have been reported as potential biomarkers for tumor response to ICIs, factors for predicting irAE have been less reported. In this review, we show recent advances in the understanding of biomarkers for tumor response and occurrence of irAEs in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Lactate dehydrogenase and baseline markers associated with clinical outcomes of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab (SHR-1210), a novel anti-PD-1 antibody

Background

A small proportion of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) could benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reliable peripheral blood biomarkers for outcomes of anti‐PD‐1 immunotherapy in ESCC have not been identified.

Methods

The data of 43 patients in the ESCC cohort of a phase I trial at our center were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were administered intravenous camrelizumab (SHR‐1210), a novel anti‐PD‐1 antibody, at doses of 60 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg (4‐week interval after first dose followed by a 2‐week schedule) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Associations between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and other peripheral blood biomarkers at baseline and the efficacy of camrelizumab were also investigated.

Results

After median follow‐up of 19.6 months, the overall response rate was 25.6% (11/43), including one complete response. Median progression‐free and overall survival rates were 2.0 and 8.0 months, respectively. Patients with an elevated baseline LDH had lower tumor response rates (P = 0.02) and shorter progression‐free (P = 0.002) and overall (P < 0.0001) survival than patients with normal LDH levels. An increase in LDH levels during treatment was significantly associated with disease progression. Multivariate Cox analysis identified LDH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18), CRP (HR 0.27), the number of organs involved (HR 0.31), absolute monocyte count (HR 0.33), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR 0.36) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Serum LDH, which is readily available in routine clinical practice, is a potential marker for response and a powerful independent factor for survival in advanced ESCC patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 therapy.

High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts worse outcome in patients with metastatic BRAF-positive melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be prognostic in several solid malignancies. There are limited data regarding its value during novel therapies in patients with melanoma. The aim of the study was to assess the practical utility of this ratio in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi). We included 215 patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma who underwent BRAFi/MEKi treatment between October 2015 and June 2017. Baseline NLR and other complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers were tested for association with overall survival and progression-free survival in univariate and multivariate models. On-treatment NLR was also assessed for relationship with these outcomes using the time-dependent Cox's proportional hazard model. Prognostic model based on NLR and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels was also developed. Patients with NLR values more than four had poorer progression-free survival (P<0.001, 1-year rates 51.6 vs. 26.7%) and overall survival (P<0.001, 1-year rates 77.3 vs. 53.1%). In a multivariate model adjusted for LDH levels, metastatic sites and age baseline NLR ratio and delay in starting MEKi were deemed statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.81; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.85; P=0.009 and hazard ratio: 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.44, P=0.005 respectively). In a model based on NLR and LDH, 1-year survival rates were 57, 40 and 23%, respectively if zero, one or both factors were elevated. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of NLR and a predictive model based on combinations of NLR and LDH as a prognostic markers during BRAFi/MEKi treatment. Our real-world data confirm the efficacy of BRAFi/MEKi therapy showed in the clinical trials.

[The pathology of adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors]

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has gained importance with the development of new effective cancer treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are monoclonal antibodies that promote T‑cell mediated tumor immune rejection. Checkpoint blockade also carries the risk of inducing autoimmune reactions ("immune related adverse events", irAEs). The diagnosis and classification of irAEs constitute a new and important field in pathology.

AIM

Practice-oriented review of the diagnosis and classification of irAEs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Structured, selective literature review based on PubMed und UpToDate ® online.

RESULTS

The most common irAEs affect the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, and the respiratory system. The correct diagnosis and classification of irAEs by an interdisciplinary care team is essential for appropriate therapy and the prevention of long-term sequelae. Other important irAEs affect the endocrine organs, the heart, the joints, the kidneys and the nervous system. Because of their rarity and/or limited options for bioptic diagnosis, only limited data on the morphology and pathophysiology of these irAEs are currently available. Autopsies carried out after ICI therapy constitute an important element of quality control and allow better documentation of the incidence and pathogenesis of irAEs.

DISCUSSION

Pathology plays a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of irAEs. Future studies may contribute to a better mechanistic understanding of irAEs for individualized knowledge-based risk assessment.

Prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy with ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma

New therapies, including the anti‐cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)‐4 antibody, ipilimumab, is approved for metastatic melanoma. Prognostic biomarkers need to be identified, because the treatment has serious side effects. Serum samples were obtained before and during treatment from 56 patients with metastatic or unresectable malignant melanoma, receiving treatment with ipilimumab in a national Phase IV study (NCT0268196). Expression of a panel of 17 inflammatory‐related markers reflecting different pathways including extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrosis, vascular inflammation and monocyte/macrophage activation were measured at baseline and the second and/or third course of treatment with ipilimumab. Six candidate proteins [endostatin, osteoprotegerin (OPG), C‐reactive protein (CRP), pulmonary and activation‐regulated chemokine (PARC), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and galectin‐3 binding‐protein (Gal3BP)] were persistently higher in non‐survivors. In particular, high Gal3BP and endostatin levels were also independently associated with poor 2‐year survival after adjusting for lactate dehydrogenase, M‐stage and number of organs affected. A 1 standard deviation increase in endostatin gave 1·74 times [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·10–2·78, P = 0·019] and for Gal3BP 1·52 times (95% CI = 1·01–2·29, P = 0·047) higher risk of death in the adjusted model. Endostatin and Gal3BP may represent prognostic biomarkers for patients on ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma and should be further evaluated. Owing to the non‐placebo design, we could only relate our findings to prognosis during ipilimumab treatment.

Correlation between hematological parameters and ancylostomiasis: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Our aim intended to determine the relationship between hematological parameters (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [ELR]) and ancylostomiasis.

METHODS

There were 140 patients with ancylostomiasis and 159 healthy controls enrolled in this study. All data were collected from electronic medical records of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.

RESULTS

The levels of NLR, PLR, and ELR in ancylostomiasis patients were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls (all P = 0.000). A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these three hematological parameters. ELR (AUC = 0.850; sensitivity = 75.00%; specificity = 86.80%) showed the superior AUC than those of NLR (AUC = 0.718; sensitivity = 53.57%; specificity = 88.68%) and PLR (AUC = 0.806; sensitivity = 68.57%; specificity = 86.79%), respectively. A multivariate regression model using the two selected indices (RBC and ELR) was established with the model's sensitivity and specificity reached 82.86% and 96.23%, respectively. In the ancylostomiasis patient group, NLR (r = -0.452, P = 0.000) and PLR (r = -0.357, P = 0.000) were reversely associated with eosinophils.

CONCLUSION

The pretreatment levels of the three hematological parameters (NLR, PLR, and ELR) may serve as valuable indicators for distinguishing patients with ancylostomiasis from healthy controls. NLR and PLR are negatively associated with the previous indicator, eosinophils.

Relation of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to survival and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation

Background

A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation and together with the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is associated with worse outcomes in several solid tumors. We investigated the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with primary or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with HNSCC was performed. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and PLR were computed using complete blood counts (CBCs) performed within 10 days before treatment start. The prognostic role of NLR and PLR was evaluated with univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusting for disease-specific prognostic factors. NLR and PLR were assessed as log-transformed continuous variables (log NLR and log PLR). Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and acute toxicity.

Results

We analyzed 186 patients treated from 2007 to 2010. Primary sites were oropharynx (45%), oral cavity (28%), hypopharynx (14%), and larynx (13%). Median follow-up was 49 months. Higher NLR was associated with OS (adjusted HR per 1 unit higher log NLR = 1.81 (1.16–2.81), p = 0.012), whereas no association could be shown with LRFS (HR = 1.49 (0,83-2,68), p = 0.182), DRFS (HR = 1.38 (0.65–3.22), p = 0.4), or acute toxicity grade ≥ 2. PLR was not associated with outcome, nor with toxicity.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that in HNSCC patients treated with primary or adjuvant (C)RT, NLR is an independent predictor of mortality, but not disease-specific outcomes or toxicity. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a readily available biomarker that could improve pre-treatment prognostication and may be used for risk-stratification.

Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the clinical treatment of multiple cancers. Recent studies revealed the potential prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients receiving ICIs; however, the results were inconsistent. We conducted a meta‐analysis to identify the prognostic significance of baseline NLR and PLR in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

We conducted a thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies dealing with the prognostic impact of pretreatment NLR and/or PLR levels in cancer patients treated with ICIs. The clinical outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate heterogeneity.

Results

Seventeen articles involving 2092 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled HRs of PFS and OS for NLR were 1.81(95% CI 1.36–2.41) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.68–3.03), respectively, suggesting that patients with higher baseline NLRs had significantly poorer PFS and OS. Similar results were detected in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. However, no significant relevance was found between PLR and clinical endpoints in patients treated with ICIs (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.88–1.48 for PFS; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12 for OS).

Conclusion

These results indicate that high pretreatment NLR but not PLR level, as a routinely obtained hematological parameter, is a potential prognostic predictor for poor PFS and OS in cancer patients receiving ICIs.

Baseline Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratios as Biomarkers of Survival in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

In the peripheral blood, the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) change in response to malignancy. These biomarkers are associated with adverse outcomes in numerous cancers, but the evidence is limited in relation to melanoma. This study sought to investigate the association between these biomarkers and survival in Stages I–III cutaneous melanoma.

Methods

This multicenter cohort study investigated a consecutive series of patients who underwent wide excision of biopsy-proven cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy during a 10-year period. The baseline NLR and PLR were calculated immediately before sentinel lymph node biopsy. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and melanoma-specific survival were generated.

Results

Overall, 1351 patients were included in the study. During surveillance, 184 of these patients died (14%), with 141 of the deaths (77%) attributable to melanoma. Worse overall survival was associated with a baseline NLR lower than 2.5 [HR 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 2.3; p < 0.001] and a baseline PLR lower than 100 (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.7 to 1.8; p < 0.001). Melanoma-specific survival also was worse, with a baseline NLR lower than 2.5 (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.2; p < 0.001) and a baseline PLR lower than 100 (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.2; p < 0.001). The 5-year survival for patients with sentinel lymph node metastases and a low NLR and PLR was approximately 50%.

Conclusion

This study provides important new data on biomarkers in early-stage melanoma, which contrast with biomarker profiles in advanced disease. These biomarkers may represent the host inflammatory response to melanoma and therefore could help select patients for adjuvant therapy and enhanced surveillance.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6660-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is associated with survival in pembrolizumab-treated metastatic melanoma patients

The peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has been associated with prognosis in many malignancies including metastatic melanoma. However, it has not been studied in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we analyzed the baseline LMR with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. A total of 133 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab were included in this retrospective study. LMR was calculated from pretherapy peripheral blood counts and the optimal cutoff value was determined by a receiver operator characteristic curve. PFS and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling. Patients with an LMR of at least 1.7 showed improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.92; P=0.024) and OS (hazard ratio=0.29; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.59; P=0.0007). The baseline LMR is associated with PFS and OS in metastatic melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab, and could represent a convenient and cost-effective prognostic biomarker. Validation of these findings in an independent cohort is needed.

Prognostic significance of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in melanoma patients: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been widely evaluated in many cancers. Here we assessed the prognostic value of pretreatment NLR in melanoma.

METHODS

A range of online databases was systematically searched up to March,2018 for identify available studies which assessed the prognostic significance of NLR. Data from studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were weighted by generic inverse-variance and pooled in random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 4593 individuals were included. Patients with elevated NLR had a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28-1.90, p < .001) and disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.24-2.80; P = .003). Subgroup analyses showed that the negative prognostic effect of elevated NLR on OS remained substantial in North American and Europen populations and patients with non-metastatic and metastatic stage. Additionally, elevated NLR was related to worse OS in patients with melanoma, regardless of the sample size and the cut-off value.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with poor prognosis in melanoma patients, suggesting NLR might be a prognostic factor in patients with melanoma.