Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase induces STAT3 and ERK activation by prokineticin receptor 2 binding

Biochemical characterization of Prokineticin 2 binding to Prokineticin receptor 1 in zebrafish

Prokineticin 2 (PK2) binds to prokineticin receptor 1 and prokineticin receptor 2 (PKR1 and PKR2, respectively), two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that can mediate multiple signalling pathways by promoting the elevation of intracellular calcium and cAMP levels, phosphorylation of Akt and activation of ERK and STAT3. This work aims to evidence the conservation of protein sequence and the mechanism of PK2 binding to PKR1 to use the zebrafish model for the identification of new drugs as targets of prokineticin receptors. To this end, we first demonstrated that the zebrafish genes pk2 and pkr1 are phylogenetically related to orthologous mammalian genes by constructing evolutionary trees and performing syntenic analyses. Subsequently, by comparing the amino acid sequences, we showed that the interaction sites with PK2 are conserved in the zPKR1. Using GST pull-down and cross-linking experiments, we demonstrated the crucial role of the N-terminal region of zPKR1 for binding to the PK2. Finally, by expressing zPKR1 in CHO cells, we demonstrated the ability of zPKR1 to induce the activation of ERK and STAT3.

Genetic Polymorphisms of Prokineticins and Prokineticin Receptors Associated with Human Disease

Prokineticins (PKs) are low molecular weight proteins that exert their effects by binding to two seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (prokineticin receptors, PKRs). The prokineticin system is an important player in the development of various diseases. Several polymorphisms that are associated with infertility, neuroendocrine disorders, Hirschsprung's syndrome (HSCR), idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) and congenital disorders such as Kallmann syndrome (KS) have been described for both the PKs and PKR genes. The aim of this study is to summarize and describe the impact of PK/PKR polymorphisms on the pathogenesis and outcome of the above diseases, highlighting the PK system as a therapeutic target and diagnostic biomarker in pathological conditions.

MRAP2a Binds and Modulates Activity and Localisation of Prokineticin Receptor 1 in Zebrafish

The prokineticin system plays a role in hypothalamic neurons in the control of energy homeostasis. Prokineticin receptors (PKR1 and PKR2), like other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in the regulation of energy intake and expenditure and are modulated by the accessory membrane protein 2 of the melanocortin receptor (MRAP2). The aim of this work is to characterise the interaction and regulation of the non-melanocortin receptor PKR1 by MRAP2a in zebrafish (zMRAP2a) in order to use zebrafish as a model for the development of drugs targeting accessory proteins that can alter the localisation and activity of GPCRs. To this end, we first showed that zebrafish PKR1 (zPKR1) is able to interact with both zMRAP2a and human MRAP2 (hMRAP2). This interaction occurs between the N-terminal region of zPKR1 and the C-terminal domain of zMRAP2a, which shows high sequence identity with hMRAP2 and a similar propensity for dimer formation. Moreover, we demonstrated that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, zMRAP2a or hMRAP2 are able to modulate zPKR1 activation induced by zebrafish PK2 (zPK2) resulting in an impaired ERK and STAT3 activation.

Mapping the interaction site for β-arrestin-2 in the prokineticin 2 receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a family of cell membrane receptors that couple and activate heterotrimeric G proteins and their associated intracellular signalling processes after ligand binding. Although the carboxyl terminal of the receptors is essential for this action, it can also serve as a docking site for regulatory proteins such as the β-arrestins. Prokineticin receptors (PKR1 and PKR2) are a new class of GPCRs that are able to activate different classes of G proteins and form complexes with β-arrestins after activation by the endogenous agonists PK2. The aim of this work was to define the molecular determinants within PKR2 that are required for β-arrestin-2 binding and to investigate the role of β-arrestin-2 in the signalling pathways induced by PKR2 activation. Our data show that PKR2 binds constitutively to β-arrestin-2 and that this process occurs through the core region of the receptor without being affected by the carboxy-terminal region. Indeed, a PKR2 mutant lacking the carboxy-terminal amino acids retains the ability to bind constitutively to β-arrestin-2, whereas a mutant lacking the third intracellular loop does not. Overall, our data suggest that the C-terminus of PKR2 is critical for the stability of the β-arrestin-2-receptor complex in the presence of PK2 ligand. This leads to the β-arrestin-2 conformational change required to initiate intracellular signalling that ultimately leads to ERK phosphorylation and activation.

MRAP2 Inhibits β-Arrestin-2 Recruitment to the Prokineticin Receptor 2

Melanocortin receptor accessory protein 2 (MRAP2) is a membrane protein that binds multiple G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in the control of energy homeostasis, including prokineticin receptors. These GPCRs are expressed both centrally and peripherally, and their endogenous ligands are prokineticin 1 (PK1) and prokineticin 2 (PK2). PKRs couple all G-protein subtypes, such as Gαq/11, Gαs, and Gαi, and recruit β-arrestins upon PK2 stimulation, although the interaction between PKR2 and β-arrestins does not trigger receptor internalisation. MRAP2 inhibits the anorexigenic effect of PK2 by binding PKR1 and PKR2. The aim of this work was to elucidate the role of MRAP2 in modulating PKR2-induced β-arrestin-2 recruitment and β-arrestin-mediated signalling. This study could allow the identification of new specific targets for potential new drugs useful for the treatment of the various pathologies correlated with prokineticin, in particular, obesity.

Discovery of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of chronic Chagas heart disease via a small RNA-Seq approach

Chagas disease affects approximately 7 million people worldwide in Latin America and is a neglected tropical disease. Twenty to thirty percent of chronically infected patients develop chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy decades after acute infection. Identifying biomarkers of Chagas disease progression is necessary to develop better therapeutic and preventive strategies. Circulating microRNAs are increasingly reliable biomarkers of disease and therapeutic targets. To identify new circulating microRNAs for Chagas disease, we performed exploratory small RNA sequencing from the plasma of patients and performed de novo miRNA prediction, identifying potential new microRNAs. The levels of the new microRNAs temporarily named miR-Contig-1519 and miR-Contig-3244 and microRNAs that are biomarkers for nonchagasic cardiomyopathies, such as miR-148a-3p and miR-224-5p, were validated by quantitative reverse transcription. We found a specific circulating microRNA signature defined by low miR-Contig-3244, miR-Contig-1519, and miR-148a-3 levels but high miR-224-5p levels for patients with chronic Chagas disease. Finally, we predicted in silico that these altered circulating microRNAs could affect the expression of target genes involved in different cellular pathways and biological processes, which we will explore in the future.

Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Prokineticin Receptors in Diseases

The prokineticins (PKs) were discovered approximately 20 years ago as small peptides inducing gut contractility. Today, they are established as angiogenic, anorectic, and proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, hormones, and neuropeptides involved in variety of physiologic and pathophysiological pathways. Their altered expression or mutations implicated in several diseases make them a potential biomarker. Their G-protein coupled receptors, PKR1 and PKR2, have divergent roles that can be therapeutic target for treatment of cardiovascular, metabolic, and neural diseases as well as pain and cancer. This article reviews and summarizes our current knowledge of PK family functions from development of heart and brain to regulation of homeostasis in health and diseases. Finally, the review summarizes the established roles of the endogenous peptides, synthetic peptides and the selective ligands of PKR1 and PKR2, and nonpeptide orthostatic and allosteric modulator of the receptors in preclinical disease models. The present review emphasizes the ambiguous aspects and gaps in our knowledge of functions of PKR ligands and elucidates future perspectives for PK research. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides an in-depth view of the prokineticin family and PK receptors that can be active without their endogenous ligand and exhibits "constitutive" activity in diseases. Their non- peptide ligands display promising effects in several preclinical disease models. PKs can be the diagnostic biomarker of several diseases. A thorough understanding of the role of prokineticin family and their receptor types in health and diseases is critical to develop novel therapeutic strategies with safety concerns.

Modulation of STAT-1, STAT-3, and STAT-6 activities in THP-1 derived macrophages infected with two Trypanosoma cruzi strains

Trypanosoma cruzi is the causative protozoan of Chagas' Disease, a neglected tropical disease that affects 6-7 million people worldwide. Interaction of the parasite with the host immune system is a key factor in disease progression and chronic symptoms. Although the human immune system is capable of controlling the disease, the parasite has numerous evasion mechanisms that aim to maintain intracellular persistence and survival. Due to the pronounced genetic variability of T. cruzi, co-infections or mixed infections with more than one parasite strain have been reported in the literature. The intermodulation in such cases is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the co-infection of T. cruzi strains G and CL compared to their individual infections in human macrophages derived from THP-1 cells activated by classical or alternative pathways. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that trypomastigotes were more infective than extracellular amastigotes (EAs) and that strain G could infect more macrophages than strain CL. Classically activated macrophages showed lower number of infected cells and IL-4-stimulated cells displayed increased CL-infected macrophages. However, co-infection was a rare event. CL EAs decreased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), whereas G trypomastigotes displayed increased ROS detection in classically activated cells. Co-infection did not affect ROS production. Monoinfection by strain G or CL mainly induced an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile by decreasing inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1β) and/or increasing IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β. Co-infection led to a predominant inflammatory milieu, with reduced IL-10 and TGF-β, and/or promotion of IFN-γ and IL-1β release. Infection by strain G reduced activation of intracellular signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) factors. In EAs, monoinfections impaired STAT-1 activity and promoted phosphorylation of STAT-3, both changes may prolong cell survival. Coinfected macrophages displayed pronounced activation of all STATs examined. These activations likely promoted parasite persistence and survival of infected cells. The collective results demonstrate that although macrophages respond to both strains, T. cruzi can modulate the intracellular environment, inducing different responses depending on the strain, parasite infective form, and co-infection or monoinfection. The modulation influences parasite persistence and survival of infected cells.

Arginine 125 Is an Essential Residue for the Function of MRAP2

MRAP2 is a small simple transmembrane protein arranged in a double antiparallel topology on the plasma membrane. It is expressed in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, where it interacts with various G protein-coupled receptors, such as the prokineticin receptors, and regulates energy expenditure and appetite. The aim of this work was to analyze the functional role of the specific arginine residue at position 125 of MRAP2, which affects protein conformation, dimer formation, and PKR2 binding. Results obtained with the MRAP2 mutants R125H and R125C, which are found in human patients with extreme obesity, and mouse MRAP2, in which arginine 125 is normally replaced by histidine, were compared with those obtained with human MRAP2. Understanding the mechanism by which MRAP2 regulates G protein-coupled receptors helps in elucidating the metabolic pathways involved in metabolic dysfunction and in developing new drugs as specific targets of the MRAP2-PKR2 complex.

Anosmin 1 N-terminal domains modulate prokineticin receptor 2 activation by prokineticin 2

The X-linked form of Kallmann syndrome (KS), characterized by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and anosmia, is due to mutations in the ANOS1 gene that encodes for the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein anosmin 1. Prokineticins (PKs) exert their biological functions through the activation of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) prokineticin receptor 1 and 2 (PKR1, 2), and mutations in the PK2 and PKR2 genes are involved in the pathogenesis of KS. We have previously shown interaction between PKR2 and anosmin 1 in vitro. In the current report we present evidence of the modulation of PK2/PKR2 activity by anosmin 1, since this protein is able to enhance the activation of the ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) pathway elicited by PK2 through PKR2. We also show that the N-terminal region of anosmin 1, capable of binding to the PK2-binding domain of PKR2, seems to be responsible for this effect. The whey acidic protein domain (WAP) is necessary for this modulatory activity, although data from GST pull-down (glutathione-S-transferase) and analysis of the N267K mutation in the fibronectin type III domain 1 (FnIII.1) suggest the cysteine-rich (CR) and the FnIII.1 domains could assist the WAP domain both in the binding to PKR2 and in the modulation of the activation of the receptor by PK2. Our data support the idea of a modulatory role of anosmin 1 in the biological effects controlled by the PK2/PKR2 system.

Identification of Regions Involved in the Physical Interaction between Melanocortin Receptor Accessory Protein 2 and Prokineticin Receptor 2

Melanocortin Receptor Accessory Protein 2 (MRAP2) modulates the trafficking and signal transduction of several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in the control of energy homeostasis, such as Prokineticin receptors (PKRs). They bind the endogenous ligand prokineticin 2 (PK2), a novel adipokine that has an anorexic effect and modulates thermoregulation and energy homeostasis. In the present work, we used biochemical techniques to analyze the mechanism of interaction of MRAP2 with PKR2 and we identified the specific amino acid regions involved in the complex formation. Our results indicate that MRAP2 likely binds to the N-terminal region of PKR2, preventing glycosylation and consequently the correct receptor localization. We also identified a C-terminal region of MRAP2 that is critical for the interaction with PKR2. Consequently, we analyzed the role of the prokineticin transduction system in the regulation of MRAP2 expression in tissues involved in the control of food intake: at the central level, in hypothalamic explants, and at the peripheral level, in adipocytes. We demonstrated the modulation of MRAP2 expression by the prokineticin transduction system.

Prokineticin-Receptor Network: Mechanisms of Regulation

Prokineticins are a new class of chemokine-like peptides that bind their G protein-coupled receptors, PKR1 and PKR2, and promote chemotaxis and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines following tissue injury or infection. This review summarizes the major cellular and biochemical mechanisms of prokineticins pathway regulation that, like other chemokines, include: genetic polymorphisms; mRNA splice modulation; expression regulation at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels; prokineticins interactions with cell-surface glycosaminoglycans; PKRs degradation, localization, post-translational modifications and oligomerization; alternative signaling responses; binding to pharmacological inhibitors. Understanding these mechanisms, which together exert substantial biochemical control and greatly enhance the complexity of the prokineticin-receptor network, leads to novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention. In this way, besides targeting prokineticins or their receptors directly, it could be possible to indirectly influence their activity by modulating their expression and localization or blocking the downstream signaling pathways.