Is routine ultrasound guidance really necessary for closure of patent foramen ovale using the Amplatzer PFO occluder?

Percutaneous closure of simple congenital heart diseases under echocardiographic guidance

Congenital heart disease (CHD), birth defect with the highest incidence rates worldwide, and is mainly characterized by the abnormal internal structure of the heart or/and the anatomical structure of great vessels. In the past few decades, CHD repair surgery through standard median sternotomy incision combined with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technology has been considered the gold standard for surgical correction of heart and great vessels. With the promotion and clinical application of interventional catheterization technology, transcatheter closure of CHD under radioactive radiation has gradually been recognized and applied. However, its radiation exposure and potential complications related to arteriovenous vessels still face challenges. In recent years, an increasing number of surgeons have explored new surgical procedures, for the safe and effective treatment of CHD, as far as possible to reduce surgical trauma, avoid radiation exposure, and improve the cosmetic effect. Therefore, on the premise of satisfactory exposure or guidance, how to integrate ultrasound and percutaneous interventional technology remained the focus of the exploration. This mini-review highlights and summarizes the signs of progress of ultrasound intervention in the last decade that have proven the effectiveness and operability of a well-established procedure for percutaneous closure of congenital heart diseases under echocardiographic guidance only. We discuss potential diseases that will benefit from this emerging procedure based on this progress. Owing to the crucial advantages played by this strategy in the treatment of CHD, better understanding and promotion of this less exploited field may contribute to the development of therapeutics targeting CHD, improve medical utilization rate, promote the optimization of medical resources, and ultimately achieve precise and efficient medical treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder in the closure of secundum type atrial septal defects.

BACKGROUND

The Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO; Abbott, St. Paul, MN) is an FDA-approved device for percutaneous closure of secundum type atrial septal defects (ASD). Previous small cohort trials have shown a favorable safety and technical efficacy profile.

METHODS

We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of all prospective case series and controlled trials that evaluated the ASO's safety and implant efficacy. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of implantations. Secondary outcomes included proportions of arrhythmias and embolism specific-adverse events.

RESULTS

We included a total of 12 studies with 2972 patients. The ratio of device implantation was 2:1 by sex [female: male]. Pooled technical success rate of implantation was 98% (95% CI: 0.968-0.990, P < 0.01). The cumulative adverse event rate was 5.1% (95% CI: 0.035-0.068, P < 0.01), which included arrhythmia and embolism specific adverse event rates of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.007-0.032, P < 0.01) and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.002-0.013, P < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity analysis did not significantly affect pooled outcomes for success rate and adverse events; both forest plot and Begg's and Egger's regression tests supported symmetricity.

CONCLUSION

A high likelihood of technical success can be expected when implanting the ASO in secundum type ASDs. Adverse event rates are expected for one in twenty patients, and thus, our results support the safe use of ASO in secundum type ASDs closure.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

The AMPLATZER Septal Occluder is an FDA-approved device for percutaneous closure of secundum type atrial septal defects (ASD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of all prospective case series and controlled trials that evaluated the ASO's safety and implant efficacy. We included a total of 12 studies with 2972 patients. Pooled technical success rate of implantation was 98% (P < 0.01). The cumulative adverse event rate was 5.1% (P < 0.01), 1.8% (P < 0.01) rate of arrhythmias, and 0.7% (P < 0.01) rate of embolisms. A high likelihood of technical success can be expected with a low rate of adverse events.

Periprocedural Outcomes of Fluoroscopy-Guided Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With Selective Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized trials have confirmed the role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke. Guidelines have suggested a central role for intraprocedural imaging using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). However, this modality may not be required to achieve safe and effective closure. We aimed to examine the periprocedural outcomes of PFO closure retrospectively, using fluoroscopic guidance in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with provisional ICE guidance driven by anatomic and procedural factors.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent PFO closure in a single centre using the Amplatzer PFO occluder (AGA Medical Corporation, Plymouth, Minnesota) for cryptogenic stroke was conducted. Outcomes analyzed included procedural data, periprocedural complications, length of stay, and factors contributing to the use of intraprocedural imaging.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2017, 467 patients underwent PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke with the Amplatzer PFO occluder; 381 patients underwent closure with fluoroscopy alone, and 86 with ICE and fluoroscopic guidance. Periprocedural arrhythmic complications occurred in 1.3% in the fluoroscopy group and 1.2% in the ICE group (P = 1.000). Vascular complications occurred in 0.5% in the fluoroscopy group and 2.3% (P = 0.323) in the ICE group. One device embolized requiring surgical intervention. There was no in-hospital mortality or stroke. Same-day discharge occurred in 97.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our single-centre experience suggests that PFO closure can be safely conducted under fluoroscopic guidance alone with provisional adjunctive ICE use limited to specific anatomic situations.