Chronic systemic glucocorticoid therapy is associated with increased risk of major vascular complications and cardiac tamponade after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

TAVI-related complications, such as conduction disturbances, vascular complications or death may be related to increased inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of the systemic glucocorticoid therapy regarding the adverse events after TAVI deployment.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systemic search of PubMed, a reference list of relevant articles, and Medline. The main efficacy outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiac and non-cardiac death, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), new left bundle branch block (LBBB), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). Safety endpoints were major vascular complications, major bleeding events, and cardiac tamponade.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 7 studies including data from 3439 patients with a median follow-up was 30 days. Systemic glucocorticoid compared to the control group were associated with an increased risk of non-cardiac death (Relative Risk [RR] 5.90 95%CI [2.95; 11.80], P<0.001) major vascular complications (RR 1.78, 95%CI [1.22 - 2.61], P=0.003) and cardiac tamponade (RR 3.42, 95%CI [1.69 - 6.92], P<0.001). However, there were no differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, new LBBB, stroke, MI, or major bleeding events (all P values >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucocorticoid therapy before the TAVI procedure was associated with an increase in non-cardiac death, major vascular events and cardiac tamponade. There were no differences in the risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, PPM or LBBB, stroke, or MI.

Intraoperative Corticosteroids and Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation remain a common complication, increasing morbidity and mortality in these patients. Hence, measures to lower its incidence should be taken, and corticosteroid therapy could be effective by reducing inflammation caused by direct mechanical trauma to the conduction system.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, analyzing the medical records of patients with native severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVR in 2022. The Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of pacemaker implantation in patients who received corticosteroids with patients who didn't. The statistical significance was considered for a p-value <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 341 patients were included in this study. Monitored anesthesia care was the preferred anesthetic technique (99.1%). Sixty-three point three percent (63.3%) of patients received corticosteroids at the beginning of the procedure. Corticosteroid administration did not significantly affect the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (p=0.277), vascular complications on the access site (p=0.765), or in-hospital mortality (p=0.909). Male gender, 1st-degree atrioventricular block, and right branch block were the only identified predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transfemoral TAVR (p=0.041 <0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid administration at the beginning of TAVR doesn't seem to influence the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation, which can suggest that other factors play a more important role in the development of conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation.

Vascular Complications and Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients on Chronic Steroid Therapy. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic steroid (CS) therapy was reportedly linked to increased vascular complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, its association with vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained uncertain, with conflicting results being reported.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the rate of vascular complications and outcomes between patients with and without (CS) use after TAVR.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from their inception until 18th April 2022 for relevant studies. Endpoints were described according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Effect sizes were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

5 studies with 6136 patients undergoing TAVR were included in the analysis. The included studies were published between 2015 and 2022. The mean ages of patients in both study groups were similar, with the CS group averaging 80 years and the non-steroid group averaging 82 years. Notably, a higher proportion of patients in the CS group were female (56%) compared to the non-steroid group (54%). CS use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major vascular complications (12.5% vs. 6.7%, RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.73-3.11, P<0.001), major bleeding (16.8% vs. 13.1%, RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.05, P<0.001), and aortic annulus rupture (2.3% vs. 0.6%, RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.67-13.01, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of minor vascular complications (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.00-2.04, P=0.05), in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 1.4%, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.74-4.70, P=0.19), and 30-day mortality (2.9% vs. 3.1%, RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.53-2.46, P=0.74) between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that CS therapy is associated with increased major vascular complications, major bleeding, and annulus rupture following TAVR. Further large multicenter studies or randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Corticosteroid Dose in Kidney Transplantation and Its Effect on Surgical Complication: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Although several studies have explored the connection between corticosteroids and renal transplant surgical complications, these studies have overlooked several factors. In addition, no review of the literature, to our knowledge, has been conducted to evaluate corticosteroid dose and incidence of posttransplant surgical complications in these patients. Thus, our objective was to carry out a systematic investigation ofthe correlationbetween corticosteroids and surgical complications in renaltransplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed and Embase databases from their inception until April 2023. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies were included if they met the association between corticosteroids and surgical complications. The search strategy was performed using MeSH and non-MeSH key words. Terms used in the electronic search included kidney transplant* OR kidney transplant(mesh) AND steroid* OR steroids(mesh) AND complication* OR intraoperative complications(mesh).

RESULTS

From 3274 articles, 8 articles were included in the systematic review. Six studies were conducted as retrospective cohorts and 2 studies as prospective cohorts. The mean age of patients included in the studies was 42.1 years. The studies were conducted between 1981 and 2023. Findings suggested that decreasing the postoperative corticosteroid dosage was associated with a lower incidence of various postoperative surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We investigated the potential benefits of reducing the dose of corticosteroids following kidney transplant. Findings suggested thatreducing the dose of corticosteroids following kidney transplant might be a viable strategy for minimizing the risk of surgical complications. However, it is essential to note that the optimal dosage and duration of corticosteroid therapy after kidney transplant may vary for each patient and should be carefully determined by the health care provider.

Impact of Long-Term Steroid Use on the Disposition of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Nationwide Sample Analysis

Background Chronic steroid use is debilitating to health, but, in some cases, it is necessary. We examined the effect of chronic steroid use on the discharge disposition of people undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods We queried the National Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. We identified patients with current chronic steroid use with the International Classification of Diseases for the Tenth (ICD-10) code Z7952. Furthermore, we used the ICD-10 procedure codes for TAVR 02RF3. Outcomes were the length of hospitalization (LOS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), disposition, in-hospital mortality, and total hospital charges (THC).  Results Between 2016 and 2019, we identified 44,200 TAVR hospitalizations, and 382,497 were on current long-term steroid therapy. Of these, 934 had current chronic steroid use and underwent TAVR (STEROID) with a mean age of 78 (SD=8.4). About 50% were female, 89% were Whites, 3.7% were Blacks, 4.2% were Hispanics, and 1.3% were Asians. Disposition was 'home,' 'home with home health' (HWHH), 'skilled nursing home' (SNF), 'short-term inpatient therapy' (SIT), 'discharged against medical advice' (AMA), and 'died.'  A total of 602 (65.5%) were discharged home, 206 ( 22%) were discharged to HWHH, 109 (11.7%) to SNF, and 12 (1.28%) died. In the SIT and AMA groups, there were only three and two patients, respectively, p=0.23. The group that underwent TAVR and was not on chronic steroid therapy (NOSTEROID) had a mean age of 79 (SD=8.5), with 28731 (66.4%) being discharged home, 8399 (19.4%) to HWHH, 5319 (12.3%) to SNF, and 617 (1.43%) died p=0.17.  Comparing the STEROID vs. NONSTEROID group, according to the CCI, the STEROID group scored higher than the NOSTEROID group; 3.5 (SD=2) vs. 3 (SD=2) p=0.0001, while for LOS, it was 3.7 days (SD=4.3) vs. 4.1 days (SD=5.3), p=0.28, and the THC was $203,213 (SD=$110,476) vs. $215,858 (SD=$138,540), p=0.15. Conclusion The comorbidity burden of individuals on long-term steroids undergoing TAVR was slightly higher than those not on steroids undergoing TAVR. Despite this, there was no statistically significant difference in their hospital outcomes following TAVR with respect to dispositions.

Systemic corticosteroid exposure and atrioventricular conductance delays after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular conduction delays (AVCD) are common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and frequently require implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Autopsy studies demonstrated the role of ischemia, inflammation, and oedema in the pathogenesis of AVCD. Corticosteroids (CS) reduce inflammation and oedema and hence might lead to a lower rate of AVCD.

METHODS

Based on a prospective single-center registry, we performed a propensity score (PS) matched analysis of subjects treated with or without systemic CS (>2.5 mg prednisolone-equivalent per day) at the time of TAVI. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPM-implantation and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) within 30 days after TAVI.

RESULTS

Among 2213 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI (51.5% female, mean age 82.1 ± 6.1 years) 89 patients were treated with systemic CS, of which 87 were included in the PS matched analysis. At 30 days, rates of the composite of PPM and LBBB were comparable between patients with versus without CS both in the overall cohort (33.7% versus 33.0%, p = 0.89) and the PS matched cohort (34.5% versus 40.2%, p = 0.443). There were no differences in a composite of major or minor vascular complications and major or life-threatening bleeding events between patients with versus without CS in the overall cohort (34.8% versus 26.6%, p = 0.088) or the PS matched cohort (33.3% versus 33.3%, p ≥ 0.999).

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study, intake of systemic CS among patients undergoing TAVI was not associated with differences in rates of AVCD, vascular complications, or bleeding events after TAVI.

Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Aortic Stenosis Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Sometimes patients with severe AS taking immunosuppressants are encountered. The effect of immunosuppressive therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with AS following TAVI were investigated.Methods and Results:In total, 282 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent transfemoral TAVI from January 2016 to December 2018 at St. Marianna University School of Medicine were reviewed. They were divided into 2 groups: the immunosuppressants group (IM group) in which patients continually used immunosuppressive drugs (n=22) and the non-immunosuppressants group (non-IM group) (n=260). The composite endpoints of a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined as non-lethal myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, heart failure requiring hospitalization, stroke, and cardiovascular death were evaluated. There were no differences in the incidence of vascular access complications (32% vs. 20%, P=0.143) and the rate of procedure success (100% vs. 93%, P=0.377) between the IM and non-IM groups. During the median follow-up period of 567 (16-1,312) days after the TAVI procedure, there were no significant differences between the IM and non-IM groups in the incidence of infectious complications (14% vs. 9%, P=0.442) or MACCE (18% vs. 20%, respectively; P=0.845).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IM after TAVI is not associated with increased vascular access complications or mid-term MACCE in patients with severe AS treated with TAVI.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Receiving Chronic Systemic Corticosteroid Treatment

The aim of this study was to describe the effects of chronic systemic corticosteroid treatment (SCT) on early and late outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). From October 2006 to November 2018, 1,299 patients underwent TAVI in our institution. Among them, 48 (3.7%) received chronic SCT at the time of procedure (SCT group). They were more frequently women (p = 0.08) and needed more often dialysis (p = 0.002). All other baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. At 30 days, there was no difference on mortality. However, after adjustment, the SCT group had more major vascular complications: 16.7% versus 7.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 5.9, p = 0.023), major or life-threatening bleedings: 22.9% versus 12.4%, HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 4.08, p = 0.05), and tamponades: 8.3% versus 2.4%, HR 4.05 (95% CI 1.35 to 12.15, p <0.001) than the non-SCT group. One-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the SCT than in the non-SCT group (37.5% vs 12.5%, p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that SCT use was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.50, p = 0.017). In conclusion, chronic use of SCT significantly increases the rates of early vascular complications, major or life-threatening bleedings and tamponade and is an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVI.

Long-Term Outcomes of Iliofemoral Artery Stents after Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE

To report long-term results of iliofemoral stent placement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TAVR access-related complications treated with iliofemoral stent placement were recorded in 56 patients (mean age, 81 years; range; 53-93 years; 48% male) of 648 patients who underwent TAVR at a single center. Fifty-six patients treated with stent placement (40 patients with stent grafts and 16 patients with bare metal stents) underwent clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up after a mean of 676 days (range, 60-1840 days).

RESULTS

During follow-up, none of the 56 patients who had stent placement underwent a vascular reintervention of the affected limb, and none suffered from limb claudication. No decrease was observed in ankle-brachial index (ABI) values to an abnormal value, except in 1 patient (mean preprocedural and postprocedural ABI of 1.2 ± 0.14, range, 0.97-1.4 and 1.19 ± 0.24, range, 0.65-1.54, respectively). Arterial duplex assessment showed normal stent flow velocity (mean, 168.7 ± 63.2 cm/sec; range, 80-345 cm/sec) in all but 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Iliofemoral stent implantation is a safe and efficacious treatment for vascular access site and access-related complications during transfemoral TAVR.

Comparison of Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Aortic Stenosis in 3 Age Groups (≤70; 71 to 80, and ≥81 Years)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been widely used for the treatment of aortic stenosis. Most pivotal studies of TAVI included patients with a mean age of over 80 years old. Many young patients may also be considered for TAVI because of severe co-morbidities. We sought to describe a group of patients undergoing TAVI at an age below 70 and to compare them with older patients undergoing the procedure. This study included 1,324 consecutive patients from a 3-center TAVI registry from 2008 to 2014. Patients were divided according to age into 3 groups: patients aged 70 years and below, patients between the ages of 71 and 80, and patients 81 years and older. Patients in the younger group had higher body mass index (p <0.001), higher proportion of previous stroke (p = 0.05), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (p <0.001). Thirty percent of patients in the younger group had functional class IV. Corticosteroids treatment was 5-fold higher in the younger group (p <0.001). Average valve area was lower in the older group (p = 0.004). Thirty-day mortality was similar between the 3 groups. We found no difference in the rate of in-hospital complications. One-year all-cause mortality rate of patients aged 70 years, 71 to 80 years, and >80 years was 7.6%, 7.5%, and 12.6%, respectively, p = 0.01. In conclusion, younger patients undergoing TAVI exhibited higher prevalence of risk factors and co-morbidities that probably explain the decision to perform TAVI rather than surgical aortic valve replacement. Nevertheless, the 1-year mortality of these patients was significantly lower than in older patients.